Colorado
Colorado Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026

Colorado is a one-party consent state for audio recording, but its eavesdropping and wiretapping statutes carry some of the steepest penalties in the country. Wiretapping is a Class 2 misdemeanor under , the same classification as eavesdropping, punishable by up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to $750. Colorado also has a specific statutory exception for security devices used on your own property, making it one of the few states that directly addresses doorbell camera scenarios in its wiretapping law. Understanding how these statutes apply to Ring doorbells is essential for every Colorado homeowner and renter.
Audio Recording Laws and Ring Doorbells in Colorado
Colorado addresses audio recording through two distinct statutes: the wiretapping law () and the eavesdropping law (). Both are one-party consent statutes, but they cover different types of communications and carry different penalties.
C.R.S. 18-9-303: Wiretapping
Colorado's wiretapping statute prohibits knowingly overhearing or recording a telephone or electronic communication without the consent of at least one party. This law applies primarily to phone calls, emails, and electronic messages. Wiretapping is classified as a Class 2 misdemeanor, the same classification as eavesdropping under , carrying up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to $750.
For Ring doorbells, the wiretapping statute becomes relevant when the device captures telephone conversations. If a visitor on your porch is talking on a cell phone and your Ring doorbell records that call, the wiretapping statute could apply since you are not a party to the phone conversation.

C.R.S. 18-9-304: Eavesdropping
The eavesdropping statute covers in-person oral communications. It prohibits any person "not visibly present during a conversation or discussion" from knowingly overhearing or recording that conversation without the consent of at least one principal party. Eavesdropping is a Class 2 misdemeanor, punishable by up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to $750.
The "not visibly present" language is significant for Ring doorbell owners. When a homeowner is physically present at the door during a conversation, they are a principal party and their consent satisfies the one-party requirement. When the homeowner is away and the Ring doorbell automatically records audio of visitors' conversations, the homeowner is not "visibly present," which could bring the recording within the scope of C.R.S. 18-9-304.
The Security Device Exception: C.R.S. 18-9-305
Colorado law provides a critical exception that directly benefits Ring doorbell owners. states that a person may use eavesdropping devices "on his own premises for security or business purposes" if "reasonable notice of the use of such devices is given to the public."
This exception is an affirmative defense, meaning the Ring doorbell owner bears the burden of proving three elements: the device is on their own property, it serves a security purpose, and reasonable notice has been given. A Ring doorbell mounted on the homeowner's front door clearly satisfies the first two elements. The third element, reasonable notice, requires posting a visible sign or sticker alerting visitors that audio and video recording is in progress.
Without visible notice, the security device exception does not apply, and a Ring doorbell recording audio of visitors' conversations could violate C.R.S. 18-9-304. The Colorado Division of Real Estate has issued guidance emphasizing the importance of providing proper notice when audio and video surveillance devices are present on residential properties.
Video Recording Laws for Ring Doorbells
Colorado imposes fewer restrictions on video-only recording than on audio. There is no general prohibition on recording video in public spaces or areas visible from public view.
C.R.S. 18-7-801: Criminal Invasion of Privacy
Colorado's invasion of privacy statute prohibits knowingly observing or taking a photograph of another person's intimate parts without consent in a situation where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. This is a Class 2 misdemeanor.
For Ring doorbells, this statute applies if the camera is positioned to capture intimate or private areas of a neighboring property, such as the interior of a home through a window. A standard doorbell camera capturing the porch, walkway, and public street would not trigger this statute.
C.R.S. 18-3-405.6: Invasion of Privacy for Sexual Gratification
A separate statute, C.R.S. 18-3-405.6, addresses invasion of privacy committed for sexual gratification purposes. This offense is a Class 1 misdemeanor, and it escalates to a Class 6 felony when the victim is under 15 or the offender has prior convictions for unlawful sexual behavior.
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
Colorado courts follow the reasonable expectation of privacy standard. Areas visible from public spaces, including front porches, driveways, and unfenced front yards, generally carry no reasonable expectation of privacy. Fenced backyards, interior rooms visible through windows, and other secluded areas do.
Ring doorbell owners should confirm their camera's field of view captures only their own property and publicly visible areas. Ring's privacy zones feature allows users to block out specific areas of the camera's view, which can help avoid capturing neighboring private spaces.
HOA Rules and Ring Doorbells in Colorado
Colorado HOAs operate under the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA, et seq.), which establishes the legal framework for community associations. The CCIOA does not specifically address doorbell cameras, but its provisions on governance, rule-making, and property modifications apply.

Architectural Review Authority
Most Colorado HOAs require homeowners to obtain approval from an architectural review committee before making exterior modifications. Ring doorbell installation typically falls under this requirement. The HOA's governing documents, including CC&Rs and design guidelines, dictate the approval process and any restrictions.
Colorado legal experts have recommended that HOAs adopt specific policies addressing doorbell cameras rather than relying on general exterior modification rules. For single-family home communities, architectural review of doorbell cameras should generally focus on visual impact and community aesthetics. For condominium communities, associations may have broader authority to limit installations to doorbell-type systems that monitor front entries while minimizing impact to common elements.
Can a Colorado HOA Ban Ring Doorbells?
A blanket prohibition on all security cameras would be difficult for a Colorado HOA to justify. Under the CCIOA, HOA rules must be reasonable and consistently enforced. An outright ban on security devices could face legal challenge, particularly if the HOA allows other exterior modifications of similar visual impact.
However, HOAs can impose reasonable conditions, such as requiring architectural approval, limiting camera placement, mandating that audio recording be disabled in common areas, or specifying aesthetic standards for visible devices.
Landlord and Tenant Rights in Colorado
Colorado landlord-tenant law does not specifically address doorbell cameras, but several principles apply.

Tenant Installation
Tenants who want to install a Ring doorbell should obtain written landlord permission before making any exterior modifications. Most Colorado leases require approval for changes to the property's exterior, including drilling for mounting hardware. Battery-powered Ring models that avoid permanent modifications may face less resistance from landlords.
Landlord-Installed Cameras
Landlords who install surveillance cameras on rental properties, including Ring doorbells at building entries, must comply with Colorado's eavesdropping and wiretapping laws. Cameras in common areas are generally permissible if tenants are informed and the cameras do not capture private interior spaces. Audio recording requires compliance with C.R.S. 18-9-304 and the notice requirement of .
The Colorado Division of Real Estate has emphasized that audio surveillance on properties requires notice, and landlords who fail to inform tenants about surveillance devices risk liability under state wiretapping and eavesdropping laws.
Multi-Unit Considerations
In apartment buildings and condominiums, a Ring doorbell in a shared hallway captures activity involving multiple residents and their guests. Colorado's one-party consent rule does not protect recordings of conversations where the device owner is neither present nor a party to the discussion. Posting visible signage near the doorbell and, ideally, disabling audio recording in these settings reduces legal exposure.
Law Enforcement Access to Ring Footage in Colorado
Colorado law enforcement generally needs a warrant or subpoena to compel access to Ring doorbell footage. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article II, Section 7 of the Colorado Constitution protect against unreasonable searches and seizures.

How Police Can Obtain Footage
Law enforcement in Colorado can access Ring footage through several channels:
Voluntary sharing. Police can ask a Ring owner to share footage voluntarily. The homeowner is free to comply or decline, and no warrant is needed for voluntary disclosure.
Search warrant. A warrant issued by a Colorado court upon a showing of probable cause compels the homeowner or Ring/Amazon to provide specific footage. This is the most common method for obtaining footage the owner refuses to share.
Subpoena. A grand jury or prosecutorial subpoena can require disclosure of footage stored in the cloud by Ring/Amazon.
Exigent circumstances. In emergencies where immediate action is necessary to prevent harm or preserve evidence, police may access footage without a warrant. This exception is narrowly applied and subject to judicial review.
Ring's Changing Policies
In January 2024, Ring announced it would stop allowing police to request footage directly from users through its Neighbors app. However, in 2025, Ring's partnership with Axon introduced a new platform for law enforcement evidence requests, where users can opt in to share recordings. Ring still maintains an emergency disclosure exception for situations involving imminent danger of death or serious physical injury.
As of April 2026, Colorado has not enacted state-specific legislation governing law enforcement access to consumer doorbell camera footage.
Penalties for Illegal Recording in Colorado
Colorado's recording law penalties are notably severe compared to many states.
Wiretapping (C.R.S. 18-9-303): Class 2 misdemeanor. Up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to $750, the same classification and penalty range as eavesdropping.
Eavesdropping (C.R.S. 18-9-304): Class 2 misdemeanor. Up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to $750.
Criminal invasion of privacy (): Class 2 misdemeanor. Up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to $750.
Invasion of privacy for sexual gratification (C.R.S. 18-3-405.6): Class 1 misdemeanor (up to 364 days in jail), escalating to a Class 6 felony for offenses involving minors or repeat offenders.
Civil liability: Individuals whose privacy has been violated may also pursue civil damages in Colorado courts, including claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Federal penalties: The FTC's 2023 enforcement action against Ring resulted in a $5.8 million settlement and required Ring to delete improperly obtained data and implement stronger privacy controls.
How to Use a Ring Doorbell Legally in Colorado
Colorado's security device exception in C.R.S. 18-9-305 provides a clear path for legal Ring doorbell use, but it requires proactive steps.
Post visible notice of recording. This is the most important step for Colorado residents. C.R.S. 18-9-305 requires "reasonable notice" to the public to invoke the security device exception. Place a clearly visible sign or sticker near the doorbell stating that audio and video recording is in progress. Without this notice, the exception does not apply.
Aim the camera at your property and public areas. Confirm the Ring doorbell captures your porch, walkway, and driveway, not your neighbor's windows or fenced backyard. Use Ring's privacy zones to exclude neighboring private spaces.
Consider disabling audio for automated recordings. When you are home and interacting with visitors through the Ring doorbell, one-party consent protects the audio recording. When you are away and the device records automatically, the "not visibly present" language of C.R.S. 18-9-304 creates uncertainty. Disabling audio for motion-activated recordings eliminates this risk.
Get HOA approval. If you live in an HOA community, submit a request to your architectural review committee before installation. Include details about the device's appearance, placement, and field of view.
Get landlord permission in writing. Tenants should document landlord approval before installing a Ring doorbell, specifying the installation method, location, and removal obligations.
Enable end-to-end encryption and two-factor authentication. Following the FTC's 2023 findings about Ring's security failures, enabling these features protects your footage from unauthorized access.
More Colorado Laws
Colorado has laws addressing many aspects of daily life. Here are other Colorado legal guides on RecordingLaw.com:
- Colorado Recording Laws covers the full scope of one-party consent rules.
- Colorado Security Camera Laws addresses broader video surveillance regulations.
- Colorado Audio Recording Laws explains audio consent requirements.
- Colorado Video Recording Laws details video-specific rules.
- Colorado Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws addresses surveillance in rental properties.
- Colorado Data Privacy Laws covers the Colorado Privacy Act.
- Colorado Hit and Run Laws covers accident reporting obligations.
- Colorado Lemon Laws explains vehicle warranty protections.
This article provides general legal information about Ring doorbell laws in Colorado, not legal advice. Laws and their interpretations can change. Consult an attorney for advice specific to your situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to use a Ring doorbell in Colorado?
Yes. Ring doorbells are legal in Colorado. The state is a one-party consent jurisdiction, and C.R.S. 18-9-305 specifically allows eavesdropping devices on your own premises for security purposes if you provide reasonable notice to the public. Posting a visible sign indicating audio and video recording is the key compliance step.
Does Colorado require me to post a sign about my Ring doorbell?
Colorado's security device exception under C.R.S. 18-9-305 requires reasonable notice to the public to apply. While there is no specific sign format required by law, posting a clearly visible notice near the doorbell that states audio and video recording is in progress satisfies this requirement and invokes the statutory protection.
Is wiretapping a felony in Colorado?
No. Wiretapping under C.R.S. 18-9-303 is a Class 2 misdemeanor in Colorado, punishable by up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to $750. This applies primarily to intercepting phone and electronic communications. Eavesdropping on in-person conversations under C.R.S. 18-9-304 carries the same Class 2 misdemeanor classification.
Can my Colorado HOA ban Ring doorbells?
A blanket ban on all security cameras would be difficult for a Colorado HOA to justify under the CCIOA. However, HOAs can impose reasonable restrictions on camera placement, require architectural review approval, and mandate conditions like disabling audio recording in common areas. Review your HOA's CC&Rs and submit a formal request before installing.
Do Colorado police need a warrant for my Ring footage?
Generally, yes. Colorado law enforcement typically needs a search warrant or subpoena to compel access to Ring footage. Police can ask for voluntary sharing at any time, and homeowners can choose to comply or refuse. Ring's emergency disclosure exception allows footage release without consent in cases involving imminent danger of death or serious physical injury.
Updates
No corrections needed. The page's description of Ring's 2025 partnership with Axon for voluntary law enforcement footage requests was independently re-verified as accurate; an earlier automated review had incorrectly flagged it as fabricated.
Independently fact-checked against current primary sources.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Corrected wiretapping under C.R.S. 18-9-303: it is a Class 2 misdemeanor (identical to eavesdropping), not the fabricated Class 6 felony this page previously stated; also removed the repealed cordless-telephone carve-out.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 5 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 18: Criminal Code
§ 18-7-801Criminal invasion of privacyIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
(1) A person who knowingly observes or takes a photograph of another person's intimate parts, as defined in section 18-3-401 (2), without that person's consent, in a situation where the person observed or photographed has a reasonable expectation of privacy, commits criminal invasion of privacy. (2) Criminal invasion of privacy is a class 2 misdemeanor. (3) For the purposes of this section, photograph includes a photograph, motion picture, videotape, live feed, print, negative, slide, or other mechanically, electronically, digitally, or chemically reproduced visual material.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at olls.info
Also relied on in: Colorado Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Privacy, and Rights, Colorado School Recording Laws: Classrooms, IEP Meetings, and Surveillance, Colorado Security Camera Laws: Residential, Commercial, and Privacy Rules
§ 18-9-303Wiretapping prohibited - penaltyIn forcecited in 16 of our articles
(1) Any person not a sender or intended receiver of a telephone or telegraph communication commits wiretapping if he: (a) Knowingly overhears, reads, takes, copies, or records a telephone, telegraph, or electronic communication without the consent of either a sender or a receiver thereof or attempts to do so; or (b) Intentionally overhears, reads, takes, copies, or records a telephone, telegraph, or electronic communication for the purpose of committing or aiding or abetting the commission of an unlawful act; or (c) Knowingly uses for any purpose or discloses to any person the contents of any such communication, or attempts to do so, while knowing or having reason to know the information was obtained in violation of this section; or (d) Knowingly taps or makes any connection with any telephone or telegraph line, wire, cable, or instrument belonging to another or with any electronic, mechanical, or other device belonging to another or installs any device whether connected or not which permits the interception of messages; or (e) Repealed.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at olls.info
Cited in 4 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2001
Leading cases: Bartnicki v. Vopper (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 514) · Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A. (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1999, 191 F.3d 463) · Sequa Corp. v. Lititech, Inc. (District Court, D. Colorado 1992, 807 F. Supp. 653)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties, Colorado Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting Rules, and Evidence Use, Colorado Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Provider Rules
§ 18-9-304Eavesdropping prohibited - penaltyIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
(1) Any person not visibly present during a conversation or discussion commits eavesdropping if he: (a) Knowingly overhears or records such conversation or discussion without the consent of at least one of the principal parties thereto, or attempts to do so; or (b) Intentionally overhears or records such conversation or discussion for the purpose of committing, aiding, or abetting the commission of an unlawful act; or (c) Knowingly uses for any purpose, discloses, or attempts to use or disclose to any other person the contents of any such conversation or discussion while knowing or having reason to know the information was obtained in violation of this section; or (d) Knowingly aids, authorizes, agrees with, employs, permits, or intentionally conspires with any person to violate the provisions of this section. (2) Eavesdropping is a class 2 misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at olls.info
Also relied on in: Colorado Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Exceptions, Colorado Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights, Colorado AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
§ 18-9-305ExceptionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Nothing in sections 18-9-302 to 18-9-304 shall be interpreted to prevent a news agency, or an employee thereof, from using the accepted tools and equipment of that news medium in the course of reporting or investigating a public and newsworthy event; nor shall said sections prevent any person from using wiretapping or eavesdropping devices on his own premises for security or business purposes if reasonable notice of the use of such devices is given to the public. (2) No part of sections 18-9-302 to 18-9-304 shall apply to the normal use of services, facilities, and equipment provided by a provider of wire or electronic communication service pursuant to its tariffs on file with the public utilities commission of the state of Colorado and with the federal communications commission; and said sections shall not apply to the normal functions of any operator of a switchboard nor to any officer, agent, or employee of a provider of wire or electronic communication service or other person engaged in the business of providing service, equipment, and facilities for communication who performs an otherwise prohibited act if such act is necessary to provide the communication services,…
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at olls.info
Also relied on in: Colorado Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent and Interstate Rules
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 38: Property - Real and Personal
§ 38-33.3-101Short titleIn force
This article shall be known and may be cited as the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at olls.info
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- C.R.S. 18-9-303 - Wiretapping Prohibited(leg.colorado.gov).gov
- C.R.S. 18-9-304 - Eavesdropping Prohibited(leg.colorado.gov).gov
- C.R.S. 18-9-305 - Exceptions (Security Device on Own Premises)(leg.colorado.gov).gov
- C.R.S. 18-7-801 - Criminal Invasion of Privacy(leg.colorado.gov).gov
- Colorado Division of Real Estate - Audio and Video Surveillance in Properties(dre.colorado.gov).gov
- Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA) - C.R.S. 38-33.3-101 et seq.(leg.colorado.gov).gov
- FTC v. Ring LLC - Settlement and Enforcement Action(ftc.gov).gov
- Ring Law Enforcement Information Requests Policy(ring.com)
- Colorado Constitution, Article II, Section 7 - Security of Person and Property(leg.colorado.gov).gov