Virginia
Virginia AI Laws: What's Enacted and What's Next (2027)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 5, 2026). · Law checked current as of November 5, 2026. · 17 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

As of November 2026, Virginia has not enacted a comprehensive AI law: Governor Youngkin vetoed the High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act (HB 2094) on March 24, 2025. Virginia's AI-specific statutes are narrower: Va. Code 19.2-11.14 (HB 1642) requires a human decision-maker in criminal justice decisions, and Va. Code 22.1-20.2:1 (HB 1186 and SB 394) governs AI in public school instruction. Governor Spanberger's Executive Order 22, signed September 18, 2026, created an AI Task Force and rescinded Executive Order 30.
This page covers Virginia state law on artificial intelligence. Deepfakes and AI meeting recorders get short summaries here and have their own pages. For other states and the national picture, see our guide to state and federal AI laws.
Virginia AI Laws at a Glance

| Law or action | What it does | Status as of November 4, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| HB 2094 (2025) | Would have regulated high-risk AI systems | Vetoed March 24, 2025; veto sustained April 2, 2025; not law |
| HB 1642, Va. Code 19.2-11.14 | Human decision-maker in criminal justice decisions | In the Code (2025, c. 637) |
| HB 1186 and SB 394, Va. Code 22.1-20.2:1 | School guidance, school board policies, pilot program | In the Code (2026, cc. 937, 943); pilot expires July 1, 2030 |
| HB 797 and SB 384 (2026 Acts cc. 425, 426) | Study of AI independent verification organizations | Uncodified act; report was due November 1, 2026 |
| Executive Order 22 | AI Task Force, AI Policy Planning Unit | Effective September 18, 2026 |
| Executive Order 30 (2024) | State government AI standards | Rescinded; its published policies stay until replaced |
HB 2094: The Vetoed Virginia AI Bill
The Division of Legislative Services summarized HB 2094 as creating requirements for the development, deployment and use of high-risk AI systems, with civil penalties enforced by the Attorney General. The enrolled bill had a delayed effective date of July 1, 2026.

The Governor's veto explanation said the bill "would establish a burdensome artificial intelligence regulatory framework." It said the bill's "rigid framework fails to account for the rapidly evolving and fast-moving nature of the AI industry and puts an especially onerous burden on smaller firms and startups that lack large legal compliance departments."
Va. Code 19.2-11.14: AI in Criminal Justice Decisions
Section 19.2-11.14 covers decisions on "pre-trial detention or release, prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, probation, parole, correctional supervision, or rehabilitation of criminal offenders." Those decisions "shall be made by the judicial officer or other person charged with making such decision."
The section adds: "No such decision shall be made without the involvement of a human decision-maker." It does not ban the tools. Any recommendation or prediction from one "shall be subject to any challenge or objection permitted by law."
The section defines an artificial intelligence-based tool as "any machine-based system or algorithm, including machine learning models, predictive analytics, and decision support systems, that analyze data and generate recommendations or predictions."
Va. Code 22.1-20.2:1: AI in Virginia Schools
Section 22.1-20.2:1 directs the Department of Education, working with school divisions and other stakeholders, to compile information on current classroom AI use and post guidance for "the safe, ethical, and equitable use of an AIS in instructional settings in public elementary and secondary schools."
The guidance must address student data privacy, including FERPA and COPPA compliance, and resources and training for teachers. It must also address data privacy agreements that prohibit using division-level or student data to train or improve external AI models. Best practices include "prohibitions on relying solely on an AIS to make certain high-stakes decisions, as defined by the Department."
Each school board "shall establish, implement, and enforce policies consistent with the guidance." Any approved instructional use must give teachers access to transcripts of student interactions with the AI system.
Subsection D creates the AIS Innovation in Education Pilot Program, "with such funds as are appropriated." It expires July 1, 2030, and calls for a report by December 1 of each year.
Other sections name AI in narrower ways, including these three. Section 22.1-70.2 requires school internet policies to include instruction on topics including "content generated by artificial intelligence." Section 16.1-247.1 bars officers from knowingly and intentionally making false statements about a known material fact, prior to or during a child's custodial interrogation, to secure the child's cooperation, confession or conviction. That includes "inauthentic replica documents" created "by any means, including artificial intelligence." Section 53.1-1.3, on language services for offenders, says "internet, machine-learning, and artificial-intelligence based translation services may be used where the service is certified or otherwise specifically built for the purpose of providing accurate translations."
Executive Order 22 and the End of Executive Order 30
Executive Order 22, signed by Governor Spanberger on September 18, 2026, covers data centers and AI. Its AI section directs "the formation of a rapid-response AI Task Force," co-led by the Chief Transformation Officer, Counsel to the Governor and Secretary of Administration, with support from a new AI Policy Planning Unit.

The Task Force is told to address AI risks "through executive and legislative action," including workforce displacement and data privacy, and to evaluate Virginia law for existing enforcement and regulatory options. It reports to the Governor on a continuous basis until the Governor ends it. An executive order directs state government; it is not a statute.
The order states: "This Executive Order rescinds Executive Order No. 30 (Jan. 18, 2024) and Executive Directive No. 5 (Sept. 20, 2023) issued by Governor Glenn Youngkin." It also says the policies, standards and guidelines published under Executive Order 30 "shall remain in effect unless or until replaced through a future executive or agency action."
The Virginia Information Technologies Agency's AI page marks Executive Order 30 as rescinded. It also lists Executive Order 22, an AI standard, an AI utilization policy and Executive Order 46 on banning use of DeepSeek.
HB 797 and SB 384: The AI Verification Study
The 2026 General Assembly passed two matching acts, chapter 425 and chapter 426. They are a study directive, not a licensing law.
The acts tell the Joint Commission on Technology and Science (JCOTS) to evaluate a framework for anyone seeking to act as an independent verification organization. Such an organization would assess AI models' or applications' "adherence to standards reflecting best practices for the prevention of personal injury and property damage."
If JCOTS recommends a framework, it must also evaluate a licensing scheme and whether the Virginia Information Technologies Agency or another agency could run it. The report was due November 1, 2026. This page does not describe any report's contents.
AI Chatbots in Virginia: SB 796 and HB 635
We found no enacted Virginia statute on AI chatbots. JCOTS says in its August 2026 supplementary report that SB 796 (Artificial Intelligence Companion Chatbots and Minors Act) and HB 635 (Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Act) were sent to it for study by letter during the 2026 session.
The report says that although SB 796 mentions minors in its title and definitions, "there are no specific operative provisions pertaining to minors in the version of the bill that was continued." It recommends reintroducing chatbot legislation built on six policy principles. A recommendation is not a bill, and neither measure is law. The legislature's records show SB 796 passed the Senate 39-1 on February 17, 2026, and was continued to 2027 in a House committee on March 2, 2026. HB 635 was continued to 2027 in the same committee on February 9, 2026.
Enforcement and Insurance Guidance in Virginia
Attorney General Jay Jones announced on October 15, 2026 that Virginia joined other states in a notice filed in the bankruptcy case of Character Technologies, Inc., the company behind Character.AI. The release says the states' investigation identified potential consumer protection and privacy violations. It says the states reserved their rights to challenge a sale or plan.
Attorneys general in Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska and West Virginia announced separate suits against OpenAI on October 14, 2026. Official releases from several of those states also name Kansas. Virginia is not among those states, and a web search limited to the Attorney General's site showed no Virginia suit against OpenAI as of November 4, 2026.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners' adoption map, status as of November 3, 2026, lists Virginia Administrative Letter 2024-01, dated July 22, 2024, among state adoptions of its model bulletin on insurers' use of AI. The NAIC says the map does not determine whether a state's action contains every element of the model. Guidance of this kind states a regulator's expectations under existing law. It is not a new statute.
AI in Hiring, Health Care and Other Areas
We did not find an enacted Virginia statute written specifically for AI in hiring, AI in health care decisions, or frontier AI models. We ran keyword searches ("artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "algorithm", "automated decision", "chatbot", "generative") on a stored copy of the Code of Virginia retrieved July 29, 2026, and checked the bills named on this page.
That search covers codified sections only, so it can miss an uncodified act like the verification study above, and it is not a review of every 2026 bill record. Laws that do not mention AI can still apply to AI use.
Virginia Deepfake Laws (Va. Code 18.2-386.2)
Under Va. Code 18.2-386.2, a person commits a Class 1 misdemeanor by maliciously disseminating or selling a nude or similar image "created by any means whatsoever," with intent to coerce, harass or intimidate, where the person knows or has reason to know they are not licensed or authorized to do so. "Another person" includes someone whose image was used in creating, adapting or modifying an image and who is recognizable as an actual person.

See our Virginia deepfake laws page for the full treatment.
AI Note-Takers and Recording in Virginia
AI meeting assistants raise a recording-consent question. See our Virginia AI meeting recording laws page for how Virginia law applies to them.
How Federal AI Policy Affects Virginia
As of November 4, 2026, we found no federal statute in the public laws of the 119th Congress that sets general rules for private AI systems or generally preempts state AI laws. In December 2025, Executive Order 14365 directed federal agencies to challenge or discourage state AI laws the administration views as conflicting with national policy, and called for a federal framework from Congress. The order itself does not declare any state law invalid. See our state AI law preemption tracker.
What Changes in Virginia AI Law in 2027
As of November 4, 2026, we found no AI law scheduled to take effect in Virginia in 2027; we searched a stored copy of the Code of Virginia retrieved July 29, 2026, and the bills named on this page for the 2025 and 2026 sessions. That search can miss an uncodified act or a bill it did not surface.
- JCOTS verification study: The report was due November 1, 2026. If it recommends a framework, it must also address licensing.
- Chatbots: JCOTS's August 2026 report recommends reintroducing chatbot legislation. SB 796 and HB 635 were continued to 2027 in a House committee. We did not review any 2027 bill text.
- AI Task Force: Executive Order 22 sets no end date for it, and it is told to address AI risks through executive and legislative action.
- Executive Order 30 policies: They stay in effect until replaced.
- July 1, 2030: The school pilot program subsection expires.
More Virginia Laws
Explore other Virginia law topics on Recording Law:
- Virginia Recording Laws
- Virginia Data Privacy Laws
- Virginia Whistleblower Laws
- Virginia Sexting Laws
- Virginia Deepfake Laws
- Virginia AI Meeting Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Virginia have an AI law?
Virginia has no comprehensive AI law as of November 2026. It has narrower statutes on AI tools in criminal justice decisions (Va. Code 19.2-11.14) and AI in public school instruction (Va. Code 22.1-20.2:1), plus a 2026 study act and Governor Spanberger's Executive Order 22.
Did Virginia's HB 2094 AI bill become law?
No. The General Assembly passed HB 2094, the High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act, and Governor Youngkin vetoed it on March 24, 2025. The House sustained the veto on April 2, 2025. His veto explanation said it would establish a burdensome artificial intelligence regulatory framework.
Is Virginia Executive Order 30 still in effect?
No. Executive Order 22, signed September 18, 2026, rescinded Executive Order 30. The policies, standards and guidelines published under Executive Order 30 remain in effect unless or until replaced through a future executive or agency action.
Can AI decide a criminal case in Virginia?
Va. Code 19.2-11.14 says decisions on pretrial detention or release, prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, probation, parole, correctional supervision or rehabilitation of criminal offenders must be made by the judicial officer or other person charged with the decision, and none may be made without a human decision-maker involved. An AI tool's recommendation is subject to any challenge or objection permitted by law.
Does Virginia regulate AI in schools?
Yes, for public elementary and secondary schools. Va. Code 22.1-20.2:1 directs state guidance on AI in instructional settings and requires each school board to establish, implement and enforce policies consistent with that guidance. The section also creates a pilot program, subject to appropriations, that expires July 1, 2030.
Does Virginia regulate AI chatbots?
We found no enacted Virginia chatbot statute as of November 4, 2026. SB 796 and HB 635 went to the Joint Commission on Technology and Science for study, and its August 2026 report recommends reintroducing chatbot legislation.
Is deepfake porn illegal in Virginia?
Va. Code 18.2-386.2 makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor to maliciously disseminate or sell a nude or similar image created by any means, with intent to coerce, harass or intimidate, when the person knows or has reason to know they are not licensed or authorized to do so. That includes an altered image of a person recognizable as an actual person.
Updates
Corrected the status of Executive Order 30 (rescinded September 18, 2026), added Executive Order 22, the 2026 verification study acts and three further Code sections naming AI, restated SB 796 from the JCOTS report, and removed cost figures not found in the veto explanation.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected Virginia's AI law coverage: added the enacted criminal-justice AI statute (Va. Code 19.2-11.14) and the enacted school AI statute (Va. Code 22.1-20.2:1), which the page had described as still-pending legislation, removed a penalty tier that does not exist in Va. Code 18.2-386.2, and clarified that Virginia criminalizes distributing a deepfake intimate image but not creating one.
Fixed two dead governor.virginia.gov citations for Executive Order 30 (Virginia's state-government AI governance order) with a working Library of Virginia archive link, and corrected a sentence that described the Youngkin-to-Spanberger gubernatorial transition as a future event when Governor Spanberger has been in office since January 2026.
Corrected the description of what Va. Code Section 18.2-386.2 covers: the statute enumerates total nudity, exposure of the genitals/pubic area/buttocks/female breast, or a non-exposed but statutorily obscene image — it does not use or cover a general "engaged in a sexual act" category.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of Virginia, Title 18.2: Crimes and Offenses Generally
§ 18.2-386.2Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another; penaltyIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
A. Any person who, with the intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate, maliciously disseminates or sells any videographic or still image created by any means whatsoever that depicts another person (i) who is totally nude; (ii) who is in a state of undress so as to expose the genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast; or (iii) whose genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast are not exposed but such videographic or still image is obscene as defined in § 18.2-372 where such person knows or has reason to know that he is not licensed or authorized to disseminate or sell such videographic or still image is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. For purposes of this subsection, "another person" includes a person whose image was used in creating, adapting, or modifying a videographic or still image with the intent to depict an actual person and who is recognizable as an actual person by the person's face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at law.lis.virginia.gov
Also relied on in: Virginia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Virginia Video Recording Laws: Surveillance Rules and Privacy Limits, Virginia Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections
§ 18.2-386.1Unlawful creation of image of another; penaltyIn forcecited in 16 of our articles
A. It is unlawful for any person to knowingly and intentionally create any videographic or still image by any means whatsoever of any nonconsenting person if (i) that person is (a) totally nude; (b) clad in undergarments; (c) in a state of undress so as to expose the genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast; or (d) not exposed to show the genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast but such videographic or still image is obscene, as defined in § 18.2-372, when such nonconsenting person is in a restroom, dressing room, locker room, hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom, or other location; or (ii) the videographic or still image is created by placing the lens or image-gathering component of the recording device in a position directly beneath or between a person's legs for the purpose of capturing an image of the person's intimate parts or undergarments covering those intimate parts when the intimate parts or undergarments would not otherwise be visible to the general public; and when the circumstances set forth in clause (i) or (ii) are otherwise such that the person being recorded would have a reasonable expectation of privacy. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at law.lis.virginia.gov
Also relied on in: Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026), Virginia Smart Glasses Recording Laws, Virginia Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties
Code of Virginia, Title 22.1: Education
§ 22.1-20.2:1Artificial intelligence system use and safety in instructional settings; AIS Innovation in Education Pilot Program established; guidanceIn force
A. As used in this section: "AIS in instructional settings" means the use of artificial intelligence systems to support teaching, learning, assessment, or school operations. "Artificial intelligence system" or "AIS" means any machine learning-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs such system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, and recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments. "Artificial intelligence system" or "AIS" does not include any artificial intelligence system or general purpose artificial intelligence model that is used for development, prototyping, and research activities before such artificial intelligence system or general purpose artificial intelligence model is made available to deployers or consumers.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at law.lis.virginia.gov
Code of Virginia, Title 19.2: Criminal Procedure
§ 19.2-11.14Use of artificial intelligence-based toolIn force
A. As used in this section, "artificial intelligence-based tool" means any machine-based system or algorithm, including machine learning models, predictive analytics, and decision support systems, that analyze data and generate recommendations or predictions. B. All decisions related to the pre-trial detention or release, prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, probation, parole, correctional supervision, or rehabilitation of criminal offenders shall be made by the judicial officer or other person charged with making such decision. No such decision shall be made without the involvement of a human decision-maker. The use of any recommendation or prediction from an artificial intelligence-based tool shall be subject to any challenge or objection permitted by law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at law.lis.virginia.gov
Sources and References
- Virginia Division of Legislative Services, Governor's Amendments and Vetoes, 2025 Session (HB 2094 summary and veto explanation)(dls.virginia.gov).gov
- Va. Code 19.2-11.14, Use of artificial intelligence-based tool (2025, c. 637, HB 1642)(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Va. Code 22.1-20.2:1, AI system use and safety in instructional settings (2026, cc. 937, 943)(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia Executive Order 22 (September 18, 2026)(www.governor.virginia.gov).gov
- Va. Code 22.1-70.2, Acceptable internet use policies(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Va. Code 16.1-247.1, Custodial interrogation of a child(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia Information Technologies Agency, Artificial Intelligence governance page(www.vita.virginia.gov).gov
- 2026 Va. Acts ch. 425, JCOTS study of AI independent verification organizations(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- 2026 Va. Acts ch. 426, JCOTS study of AI independent verification organizations(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Joint Commission on Technology and Science, Supplementary Report: AI Chatbots (August 2026)(dls.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia Attorney General release on Character.AI bankruptcy filing (October 15, 2026)(www.oag.state.va.us).gov
- West Virginia Attorney General release on OpenAI suit (October 14, 2026)(ago.wv.gov).gov
- NAIC, Implementation of NAIC Model Bulletin: Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Insurers (status as of November 3, 2026)(content.naic.org)
- Va. Code 18.2-386.2, Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Va. Code 53.1-1.3, Language services for offenders (2026, c. 1059)(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia Legislative Information System, HB 2094 (2025) bill history(lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia Legislative Information System, SB 796 (2026) bill history(lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia Legislative Information System, HB 635 (2026) bill history(lis.virginia.gov).gov