West Virginia
West Virginia School Recording Laws: Security, Parents, and Students
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

West Virginia's one-party consent law (W. Va. Code 62-1D-3) permits parents to record conversations with teachers and school officials without notice, though school rules may still limit recording in meetings. Schools may use video surveillance in hallways and common areas. Cameras in bathrooms or locker rooms risk a criminal charge under W. Va. Code 61-8-28 if they capture someone nude or partially nude without their knowledge, and W. Va. Code 21-3-20 bars employer surveillance of staff restrooms, locker rooms, and lounges. State law also requires video cameras in self-contained special education classrooms and audio recording devices in those classrooms' restrooms (W. Va. Code 18-20-11). FERPA separately governs how schools store and share recordings that identify students.
Recording in West Virginia schools involves a complex intersection of the state's wiretapping law, student privacy protections under federal law, school safety requirements, and the authority of school officials to manage their educational environment. While W. Va. Code 62-1D-3 establishes one-party consent as the baseline rule, schools are unique environments where additional considerations apply.
This guide covers every aspect of school recording in West Virginia, including school surveillance systems, parent recording rights, student recording policies, IEP and special education meetings, teacher and staff recording, FERPA implications, and the use of recordings in school disciplinary matters.
School Security and Surveillance Systems
Video Surveillance in Schools
West Virginia schools widely use video surveillance systems for safety and security. The West Virginia Department of Education supports the use of security cameras as part of comprehensive school safety plans. Appropriate locations for school cameras include:
| Location | Cameras Permitted? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Hallways and corridors | Yes | Primary safety monitoring |
| Cafeterias and common areas | Yes | Large gathering spaces |
| Building entrances and exits | Yes | Access control and visitor monitoring |
| Parking lots and bus loading areas | Yes | Student safety during arrival/departure |
| Gymnasiums (common areas) | Yes | During events and general use |
| Libraries | Yes | Common study areas |
| Stairwells | Yes | Safety and security |
| Bathrooms and restrooms | Avoid video | Self-contained special education classroom restrooms must have audio recording devices (W. Va. Code 18-20-11) |
| Locker rooms and changing areas | Avoid | Criminal invasion of privacy risk (W. Va. Code 61-8-28) |
| Self-contained special education classrooms | Required | Video cameras capable of recording audio, mandated by W. Va. Code 18-20-11 |
| Other individual classrooms | Context-dependent | Some schools use them; notice recommended |
Cameras in bathrooms or locker rooms expose school officials to serious legal risk: W. Va. Code 61-8-28 (criminal invasion of privacy) makes it a crime to knowingly visually portray a person without their knowledge while that person is fully or partially nude in a place where a reasonable person would expect privacy, and such recording can also lead to civil liability. Separately, W. Va. Code 21-3-20 makes it a misdemeanor for any employer, public or private, to use video or electronic surveillance of employees in restrooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, or employee lounges.
Required Cameras in Self-Contained Special Education Classrooms
Under W. Va. Code 18-20-11, a local educational agency must ensure placement of video cameras in self-contained classrooms (classrooms where a majority of students in regular attendance receive special education instruction, as further defined in state board policy) and audio recording devices in the restrooms of those classrooms. The classroom cameras must be able to monitor and record audio from all areas of the classroom, but may not monitor a restroom or changing area except for incidental monitoring of a minor portion of one because of the classroom's layout.
Each restroom of a self-contained classroom must post a notice on its door stating that it is equipped with an audio recording device for the protection of the students. A parent or guardian may opt out of bathroom audio monitoring for their student, with the opt-out and an alternative arrangement outlined in the student's IEP or 504 plan. The statute also limits who may view the recordings and sets retention rules; it has been amended several times, most recently in the 2026 Regular Session, so check the current text.
Audio Recording in Schools
Outside the audio recording that W. Va. Code 18-20-11 requires in self-contained special education classrooms and their restrooms, audio recording by school surveillance systems raises additional legal issues under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3. For general-purpose cameras, schools should either:
- Disable audio recording features on surveillance cameras
- Limit audio capture to situations where a school employee is actively participating in the conversation
A posted notice is not a substitute: the wiretap law's only notice exception is for licensed child care centers, not schools. Many West Virginia school districts choose to use video-only surveillance to avoid wiretapping statute complications.
School Resource Officers and Body Cameras
School resource officers (SROs) stationed in West Virginia schools may wear body cameras pursuant to their law enforcement agency's policies. Body camera use in schools raises considerations including:
- Recording student behavior and disciplinary incidents
- Capturing conversations between students, which may include sensitive information
- FERPA implications when footage becomes part of a student's education record
- Storage and access policies for footage recorded in educational settings
Parent Recording Rights

Recording Conversations with School Staff
West Virginia parents can record their conversations with teachers, principals, counselors, and other school staff under the one-party consent rule. Common situations where parents record include:

- Parent-teacher conferences. Recording discussions about your child's academic performance, behavior, or special needs.
- Meetings with administrators. Documenting conversations about disciplinary actions, bullying complaints, or school policy disputes.
- Phone calls with school personnel. Recording calls about absences, academic concerns, or safety issues.
- Enrollment and registration discussions. Preserving conversations about placement decisions, program eligibility, or transfer requests.
You do not need to inform school staff that you are recording for purposes of the wiretap law. Your participation in the conversation provides the required one-party consent. Your district's meeting rules may still require notice.
Why Parents Record School Interactions
Parents record interactions with school staff for many reasons:
- Documenting special education commitments. Verbal promises about services, accommodations, or placements can be preserved.
- Preserving evidence of bullying complaints. Recording when and how you reported bullying helps establish that the school was on notice.
- Protecting against misunderstandings. An accurate record prevents disputes about what was said in meetings.
- Supporting due process complaints. In special education disputes, recordings can support claims that the school failed to provide promised services.
- Documenting discrimination. If a parent believes a child is being treated differently based on race, disability, or other protected characteristics, recordings provide evidence.
School Policies Regarding Parent Recording
Some West Virginia school districts have adopted policies that address recording during school meetings. These policies may:
- Require parents to notify staff before recording, or ask them to
- Establish specific rules for recording during IEP and other formal meetings
- Address the use and distribution of recordings made on school property
Recording a conversation you take part in is not a crime under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3, so a school policy cannot make it a criminal act. A school can still set rules about recording on its property and in its meetings, and it can ask a visitor who will not follow them to leave. Ask about the policy in advance, especially before IEP and disciplinary meetings.
Student Recording in Schools

Student Rights vs. School Authority
Student recording rights in West Virginia schools are more limited than adult recording rights in general public settings. While students technically have one-party consent rights under the wiretapping statute, schools have broad authority to regulate student behavior, including the use of electronic devices.
The U.S. Supreme Court established in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate, but schools can restrict student expression that substantially disrupts the educational process or infringes on the rights of others.
School Device Policies
Since the 2025-2026 school year, W. Va. Code 18-2-47 has required every county board of education to adopt a policy keeping students' personal electronic devices, including phones and smartwatches, inaccessible in classroom settings during instructional time. The instructional day runs from the first class period to the last, including passing periods, and classroom settings include gyms and common areas where instruction happens. Each county policy must:
- Decide whether devices may be on school property at all and, if so, how they are stored during the day
- Allow exemptions only for documented medical needs, IEP or 504 plans, other written accommodation plans, and approved work-based learning
- Set penalties for first, second, and later violations
- Provide for confiscation of the device or require a parent to pick it up
Outside an approved exemption, a teacher cannot simply permit a student to use a phone to record during instruction. Students who violate device policies face school discipline, not criminal charges. The recording itself may be legal under one-party consent, but making it in violation of school rules has consequences.
Students Recording Bullying
Students who use their phones to record bullying incidents present a challenging situation. On one hand, the recording may be legal under one-party consent if the student is a party to the recorded conversation, such as a student being bullied directly. On the other hand, school device policies may prohibit phone use. Schools should balance:
- The value of documented evidence of bullying
- The student's right to protect themselves
- The need for consistent enforcement of device policies
- The privacy interests of other students captured on the recording
Cyberbullying and Recording
West Virginia's anti-bullying laws address harassment carried out through electronic means, including the distribution of recordings. Under W. Va. Code 18-2C-3, each county board of education must adopt a policy prohibiting harassment, intimidation, or bullying of students, using a definition of those terms no less inclusive than the one in W. Va. Code 18-2C-2. Students who record others for the purpose of humiliation, harassment, or cyberbullying may face disciplinary action under their district's policy and potentially legal consequences.
IEP and Special Education Meeting Recording

Parent Rights to Record IEP Meetings
One of the most common school recording questions involves Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings. Under West Virginia's one-party consent law, a parent who records an IEP meeting they attend does not commit a crime, even without telling the other participants. That law does not, however, stop the school from limiting recording, as explained below.
Recording IEP meetings can help parents:
- Keep an accurate record of discussions about their child's services and accommodations
- Document what the school team agreed to provide
- Review complex information discussed during the meeting
- Share the recording with advocates, attorneys, or family members who could not attend
- Support a due process complaint if the school fails to implement the IEP as discussed
Federal Guidance on Recording IEP Meetings
The U.S. Department of Education addressed recording of IEP meetings in guidance published with its 1999 special education regulations (64 Fed. Reg. 12477). Federal special education law does not give parents a right to record. Under that guidance:
- No federal statute authorizes or prohibits recording of an IEP meeting by a parent or a school
- A state or school district may require, ban, limit, or otherwise regulate recording of IEP meetings
- A policy that bans or limits recording must allow it when recording is necessary for the parent to understand the IEP or the IEP process, or to exercise other parental rights under federal special education law
- A recording the school keeps is an education record under FERPA
School Responses to IEP Recording
Some West Virginia school districts have specific policies about recording IEP meetings. Common approaches include:
- Permitting recording with advance notice. The school asks parents to notify them in advance so the school can also record.
- Permitting recording without restrictions. The school accepts that one-party consent allows recording.
- Limiting or prohibiting recording. Federal guidance allows this, as long as the policy makes an exception when a parent needs the recording to understand the IEP or the process, or to exercise other parental rights under federal special education law.
Ask the school for its written recording policy before the meeting. If you need a recording to understand or take part in the meeting, request it as an accommodation and explain why.
Teacher and Staff Recording Rights
Teachers Recording in Their Classrooms
West Virginia teachers have one-party consent rights like any other resident. A teacher can record conversations they participate in with students, parents, administrators, or colleagues. Common reasons teachers record include:
- Documenting threatening behavior by students or parents
- Recording administrative meetings about performance evaluations
- Preserving evidence of hostile work environment or harassment
- Recording interactions related to classroom management disputes
School Policies Affecting Staff Recording
School district employment policies may restrict staff recording. As with other workplaces, violating a school recording policy can result in disciplinary action even though the recording was legal under state law. Teachers should review their district's policy and consult their union representative if they have questions.
Recording Student Behavior
Teachers who record student behavior must consider FERPA implications. Recordings of individual students that are maintained as part of the student's record become education records subject to FERPA protections. This means:
- The recording cannot be shared with unauthorized individuals
- Parents have the right to inspect education records, including recordings
- The recording must be maintained with appropriate security
FERPA and Student Privacy
What FERPA Covers
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. Under FERPA:
- Schools cannot release personally identifiable student information without parental consent (or student consent for students over 18)
- Parents have the right to inspect their child's education records
- Schools must maintain the confidentiality of student records
How FERPA Affects School Recordings
FERPA intersects with school recording in several ways:
- Surveillance footage. School security camera footage that identifies specific students may be considered an education record if it is maintained by the school in connection with a student. Parents may request access to footage showing their own child.
- IEP meeting recordings. Recordings of IEP meetings that are maintained by the school become part of the student's education record and are subject to FERPA protections.
- Incident recordings. Recordings of disciplinary incidents, bullying, or other events involving identifiable students are subject to FERPA when maintained as education records.
- Sharing limitations. Schools cannot share recordings containing identifiable student information with other parents, media, or the public without consent, except under FERPA exceptions (such as health and safety emergencies).
Parent Access to School Recordings
Under FERPA, parents have the right to inspect education records pertaining to their child. If a school maintains a recording that qualifies as an education record of your child, you can request access. However:
- The school may redact or withhold portions that contain identifiable information about other students
- Schools are not required to create recordings; FERPA only governs existing records
- Administrative processing of requests may take time (schools generally have 45 days to respond)
Using School Recordings as Evidence
Disciplinary Proceedings
Recordings can be used as evidence in school disciplinary proceedings, including:
- Suspension and expulsion hearings
- Bullying investigation outcomes
- Academic integrity proceedings
- Behavioral intervention planning
Legal Proceedings
Recordings made in school settings may be relevant to legal proceedings including:
- Special education due process hearings. Recordings of IEP meetings, conversations with school staff, and interactions related to IDEA compliance.
- Discrimination complaints. Recordings documenting discriminatory treatment or statements by school personnel, filed with the Office for Civil Rights (OCR).
- Personal injury cases. School surveillance footage documenting injuries, accidents, or safety hazards.
- Bullying lawsuits. Recordings preserving evidence that the school was notified of bullying and failed to act.
Admissibility Standards
Whether a lawful one-party recording of a conversation can be used in a West Virginia civil case or hearing is unsettled. Read literally, W. Va. Code 62-1D-6 lets evidence obtained by interception be received only in grand jury and criminal proceedings, and no West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals decision says whether a participant's own recording falls inside that limit, so the judge or hearing officer decides. If a recording is allowed, school recordings are subject to the same evidentiary standards as other recordings in West Virginia courts:
- Authentication through testimony of the person who made the recording
- Relevance to the issues in the case
- No evidence of tampering or alteration
- A judge may also exclude a relevant recording if its value as evidence is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion, or wasted time (W. Va. R. Evid. 403)
More West Virginia Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to West Virginia Recording Laws
More West Virginia Recording Topics
Related West Virginia Education and Family Law Topics
More West Virginia Laws
- West Virginia AI Meeting Recording Laws
- West Virginia Dashcam Laws
- West Virginia Data Privacy Laws
- West Virginia Deepfake Laws
- West Virginia Employee Monitoring Laws
- West Virginia GPS Tracking Laws
- West Virginia Police Bodycam Laws
- West Virginia Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can parents record IEP meetings in West Virginia?
Recording an IEP meeting you attend is not a crime under West Virginia's one-party consent law (W. Va. Code 62-1D-3). But federal special education law gives no right to record, and 1999 U.S. Department of Education guidance lets a school district ban or limit recording of IEP meetings, as long as it allows recording when a parent needs it to understand the IEP or the process, or to exercise other parental rights. Ask for the school's written policy before the meeting and request recording as an accommodation if you need it.
Can schools use security cameras in classrooms in West Virginia?
Yes, and in some classrooms they are required. W. Va. Code 18-20-11 requires video cameras capable of recording audio in self-contained special education classrooms, plus audio recording devices with posted notice in those classrooms' restrooms (parents may opt out of restroom audio through an IEP or 504 plan). In other classrooms, cameras are a local choice, and audio features on general-purpose cameras should be disabled, because a posted notice does not count as consent under the state wiretap law. Video cameras should not be placed in bathrooms, locker rooms, or changing areas. Schools should notify students and parents about classroom cameras.
Can students record teachers in West Virginia?
Students technically have one-party consent rights, but since the 2025-2026 school year W. Va. Code 18-2-47 has required county policies that keep students' phones and other personal devices inaccessible in classroom settings during instructional time, with exemptions only for medical needs, IEP or 504 plans, other written accommodation plans, and approved work-based learning. A student who records in violation of the policy can face confiscation and other discipline even though the recording is not a crime under state wiretapping law.
Can I get my child's school security camera footage under FERPA?
If the footage is maintained by the school and qualifies as an education record pertaining to your child, FERPA gives you the right to inspect it. The school may redact portions showing other identifiable students. Schools typically have 45 days to respond to records requests.
Can a school ban recording on school property in West Virginia?
Schools can implement policies restricting recording by students and visitors on school grounds. These policies are enforceable through school discipline and trespass rules. A school policy cannot make recording a conversation you take part in a crime, but it can limit recording in school meetings, including IEP meetings under federal guidance, and a visitor who will not follow the rules can be asked to leave.
Updates
We corrected statements that treated bathroom and locker-room cameras as flatly banned (W. Va. Code 61-8-28 turns on capturing someone nude without their knowledge), added the separate employer ban in W. Va. Code 21-3-20, narrowed when a student recording bullying is a party to the conversation, and added that whether lawful recordings of conversations can be used in a civil case or hearing is unsettled under W. Va. Code 62-1D-6.
We corrected this page to explain that federal law gives parents no right to record IEP meetings and that schools may limit recording except where a parent needs it, that one-party consent does not override school recording rules, to add West Virginia's 2025 classroom device law (W. Va. Code 18-2-47), to drop the suggestion that posted notice can cover audio, and to state the Rule 403 evidence test correctly. We corrected a line that said school policies cannot require parents to give notice before recording (schools may set such rules), restated the federal IEP recording exception to match the 1999 guidance, which also covers other parental rights, and noted that district meeting rules may require notice even though recording a conversation you take part in is not a crime.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Added West Virginia's statutory requirement (W. Va. Code 18-20-11) for video cameras in self-contained special education classrooms and audio recording devices in their restrooms, and corrected how the criminal invasion of privacy statute is described.
Updated the FERPA reference to the Department of Education dedicated student-privacy site.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of W. Va. Code 18-2C-3: it is a policy-mandate provision requiring county boards of education to adopt anti-bullying policies (drawing their definition from 18-2C-2), not a statute that itself directly prohibits electronic-means bullying.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
West Virginia Code
§ 62-1D-3Interception of communications generally.In forcecited in 36 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this article it is unlawful for any person to: (1) Intentionally intercept, attempt to intercept or procure any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept, any wire, oral or electronic communication; or (2) Intentionally disclose or intentionally attempt to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in violation of this article; and (3) Intentionally use or disclose or intentionally attempt to use or disclose the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication or the identity of any party thereto, knowing or having reason to know that such information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in violation of this article. (b) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for not more than five years or fined not more than $10,000 or both fined and imprisoned.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1999
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1999, 200 F.3d 109)“…77 -23a-4, 77-23a-11; Va. Code Ann. §§ 19.2-62 , 19.2-69; W. Va.Code §§ 62-1D-3, 62-1D-12; Wis. Stat. § 968.31 ; Wyo.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Smart Glasses Recording Laws, US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, One-Party Consent States: Complete 2026 Guide
§ 18-2C-2Definitions.In force
(a) As used in this article, "harassment, intimidation or bullying" means any intentional gesture, or any intentional electronic, written, verbal or physical act, communication, transmission or threat that: (1) A reasonable person under the circumstances should know will have the effect of any one or more of the following: (A) Physically harming a student; (B) Damaging a student's property; (C) Placing a student in reasonable fear of harm to his or her person; or (D) Placing a student in reasonable fear of damage to his or her property; (2) Is sufficiently severe, persistent or pervasive that it creates an intimidating, threatening or emotionally abusive educational environment for a student; or (3) Disrupts or interferes with the orderly operation of the school. (b) As used in this article, an electronic act, communication, transmission or threat includes but is not limited to one which is administered via telephone, wireless phone, computer, pager or any electronic or wireless device whatsoever, and includes but is not limited to transmission of any image or voice, email or text message using any such device.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
§ 18-2C-3Policy prohibiting harassment, intimidation or bullying.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Each county board shall establish a policy prohibiting harassment, intimidation or bullying. Each county board has control over the content of its policy as long as the policy contains, at a minimum, the requirements of subdivision (b) of this section. The policy shall be adopted through a process that includes representation of parents or guardians, school employees, school volunteers, students and community members. (b) Each county board policy shall, at a minimum, include the following components: (1) A statement prohibiting harassment, intimidation or bullying of any student on school property, a school bus, at a school bus stop or at school sponsored events; (2) A definition of harassment, intimidation or bullying no less inclusive than that in section two of this article; (3) A procedure for reporting prohibited incidents; (4) A requirement that school personnel report prohibited incidents of which they are aware; (5) A requirement that parents or guardians of any student involved in an incident prohibited pursuant to this article be notified; (6) A procedure for documenting any prohibited incident that is reported; (7) A procedure for responding to and…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
§ 61-8-28Criminal invasion of privacy; penalties.In forcecited in 28 of our articles
(a) For the purposes of this section, the words or terms defined in this subsection have the meanings ascribed to them. These definitions are applicable unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: (1) “A person fully or partially nude” means a male or female who is either clothed or unclothed so that: (A) All or any part of his or her genitals, pubic area or buttocks is visible; or (B) in the case of a female only, a part of a nipple of her breast is visible and is without a fully opaque covering; (2) “To visually portray” a person means to create a reproducible image of that person by means of: (A) A photograph; (B) A motion picture; (C) A video tape; (D) A digital recording; or (E) Any other mechanical or electronic recording process or device that can preserve, for later viewing, a visual image of a person; and (3) “Place where a reasonable person would have an expectation of privacy” means a place where a reasonable person would believe that he or she could, in privacy, be fully or partially nude without expecting that the act of exposing his or her body was being visually portrayed by another person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Imaginary Images, Inc. v. Evans (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2010, 612 F.3d 736)“…8 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7507.1(e); Utah Code Ann. § 76-5a-2(6); W. Va. Code § 61-8-28(a)(1); Wis. Stat. § 942.08(1)(a). The m…”
- United States v. Thoms (U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 2014)“…9-702.7 (West 2013); Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 13, § 2605 (2010); W. Va. Code § 61-8-28 (2000). 4 Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, West Virginia Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Guide, West Virginia Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights and Rules
Sources and References
- W. Va. Code 62-1D-3 - Interception of Communications(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 61-8-28 - Criminal Invasion of Privacy(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 18-2C-3 - Anti-Bullying(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- FERPA - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- IDEA - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act(sites.ed.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 18-20-11: Video cameras required in certain special education classrooms; audio recording devices required in restroom of a self-contained classroom(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov