West Virginia
West Virginia Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

West Virginia follows a one-party consent rule under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3, allowing employees to record any workplace conversation they participate in without notifying coworkers or supervisors. Employers may use video surveillance in common work areas but, under W. Va. Code 21-3-20, cannot use it in restrooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, or employee lounges, and company policies may restrict recording.
West Virginia's workplace recording laws sit at the intersection of the state's Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act, federal labor protections, and employer policy rights. Under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3, West Virginia follows a one-party consent framework that allows any participant in a conversation to record it without notifying others. This right extends to the workplace, giving both employees and employers significant latitude to record conversations they participate in.
This guide covers every aspect of workplace recording in West Virginia, including employee rights, employer surveillance powers, the role of company policies, federal labor protections, recording as evidence in employment disputes, and the penalties for illegal workplace recording.
Employee Recording Rights in the Workplace
The One-Party Consent Foundation
Under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3, any person who is a party to a conversation can record it without the knowledge or consent of other participants. In the workplace, this means employees can record:

- Conversations with supervisors and managers
- Meetings with human resources representatives
- Performance reviews and disciplinary discussions
- Phone calls with coworkers, clients, or vendors
- Group meetings they attend
- Conversations about working conditions, pay, or safety
The employee's participation in the conversation provides the necessary one-party consent. No advance notice or permission is required from the employer or other participants.
Common Reasons Employees Record at Work
Employees in West Virginia record workplace conversations for many legitimate purposes:
- Documenting harassment or discrimination. Recording interactions that demonstrate a hostile work environment, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, or other forms of unlawful treatment.
- Preserving evidence of retaliation. Capturing conversations that suggest an employer is retaliating against an employee for filing complaints, reporting safety violations, or engaging in protected activity.
- Recording performance reviews. Keeping an accurate record of what was said during evaluations, especially when the employee disputes the written version.
- Protecting against wrongful termination. Recording meetings where the employee believes they may be fired, to document the stated reasons for termination.
- Preserving verbal instructions. Keeping a record of complex or ambiguous instructions from supervisors to avoid future disputes about what was communicated.
Limitations on Employee Recording
While the law permits recording, employees should be aware of several important limitations:
- Criminal or tortious purpose exception. Under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3, recording for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act is illegal. Recording to blackmail, extort, or harass a coworker is prohibited.
- You must be a participant. You cannot place a hidden recorder in a conference room and leave, or install recording software on a coworker's computer. You must be part of the conversation.
- Employer policies. Company rules may prohibit recording even though the law allows it. Violating a company policy is not a crime, but it can have employment consequences.
- Trade secrets and confidential information. Recording discussions that involve trade secrets or proprietary information could expose you to liability under trade secret laws, even if the recording itself was legal under the wiretapping statute.
Employer Surveillance and Recording Rights

Video Surveillance in the Workplace
West Virginia employers can install video surveillance cameras in common work areas where employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Lawful locations for workplace cameras include:
| Location | Video Surveillance Permitted? |
|---|---|
| Sales floors and retail areas | Yes |
| Warehouses and production floors | Yes |
| Lobbies and reception areas | Yes |
| Parking lots and building exteriors | Yes |
| Hallways and corridors | Yes |
| Shared office spaces | Yes (with notice recommended) |
| Restrooms and shower rooms | No |
| Locker rooms and dressing rooms | No |
| Employee lounges and break rooms | No |
| Private offices (single occupant) | Context-dependent |
W. Va. Code 21-3-20 makes it a misdemeanor for any employer, public or private, to use video cameras or other electronic surveillance to monitor employees in restrooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, or employee lounges such as break rooms, with fines of $500 for a first offense, $1,000 for a second, and $2,000 after that. The ban applies whether or not anyone is undressed and whether or not employees were told about the camera. A camera that captures someone nude without their knowledge can also violate W. Va. Code 61-8-28, the criminal invasion of privacy statute.
Audio Recording and Monitoring by Employers
Employer audio recording in the workplace must comply with W. Va. Code 62-1D-3. This means:
- With a participant. If a manager or supervisor is participating in a conversation, the employer can record through that participant's consent.
- Without a participant. Installing audio recording devices to capture employee conversations that no management representative participates in violates the wiretapping statute. This includes hidden microphones in break rooms, conference rooms, or workspaces.
- Phone monitoring. An employer may record or monitor a business call when a supervisor or other employee taking part in it consents. West Virginia's wiretap law also excludes business phone equipment used in the ordinary course of business from its definition of an intercepting device. Telling employees about a monitoring policy is good practice, but West Virginia law does not say that notice alone counts as consent. The federal business extension exception allows limited monitoring of business calls on employer-provided phone systems, but personal calls must not be monitored once their personal nature becomes apparent.
Computer and Electronic Monitoring
Employers may monitor employee use of company-owned computers, email systems, and other electronic resources. This type of monitoring is generally lawful when:
- Employees are informed about monitoring through policies or handbooks
- Monitoring covers company-owned devices and systems
- The monitoring serves legitimate business purposes (security, productivity, compliance)
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) provides additional federal framework for electronic monitoring. Employer-provided systems generally give the employer authorization to monitor communications on those systems.
Company Recording Policies

Can Employers Ban Recording?
West Virginia employers can implement policies that prohibit or restrict audio and video recording in the workplace. While such policies cannot make the recording a criminal act (since W. Va. Code 62-1D-3 determines criminal liability), they can:
- Establish recording restrictions as a condition of employment
- Impose disciplinary consequences for policy violations, including termination
- Require employees to obtain permission before recording
- Restrict recording to certain areas or situations
At-Will Employment and Recording Policies
West Virginia is an at-will employment state, meaning employers can generally terminate employees for any reason that is not unlawful. An employee who violates a no-recording policy can be fired for that violation, even though the recording was legal under state wiretapping law.
However, there are important exceptions to this at-will principle that may protect employees who record:
- Public policy exception. West Virginia recognizes a public policy exception to at-will employment. An employee who is fired for recording evidence of illegal activity by the employer may have a wrongful termination claim.
- Retaliation protections. If an employee records evidence of discrimination, harassment, or safety violations, firing them for recording may constitute illegal retaliation under federal and state anti-discrimination laws.
- Whistleblower protections. West Virginia's Whistleblower Law protects only public employees, such as state, county, and city workers, who report wrongdoing or waste, and recording evidence to support such a report may be protected activity. Private-sector employees may instead be protected by federal laws or by the public policy exception described above.
Sensitive-Area Prohibition: W. Va. Code § 21-3-20
W. Va. Code § 21-3-20 prohibits both public and private employers from using electronic surveillance in rest rooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, and employee lounges. This prohibition is non-derogable: an employer cannot bootstrap one-party consent by having a manager present in the lounge with a recording device. Penalties escalate by offense: $500 (first), $1,000 (second), $2,000 (third or subsequent), imposed upon a misdemeanor conviction, not a civil penalty. These criminal fines stack on top of any other § 62-1D-3 criminal exposure.
NLRA Protections for Workplace Recording
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects employees' rights to engage in "concerted activity" for mutual aid and protection, including discussing wages, working conditions, and workplace concerns. The controlling NLRB standard for facially challenged no-recording work rules is Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (Aug. 2, 2023): a blanket "no recording" policy is presumptively unlawful if it would tend to chill Section 7 rights; the employer must show a legitimate and substantial business interest not achievable with a narrower rule. NLRB General Counsel Memo GC 25-05 (February 14, 2025) rescinded about 30 earlier General Counsel memos, including GC 23-02 on electronic monitoring of employees. A General Counsel memo cannot overrule a Board decision, so Stericycle remains the Board's standard for judging workplace rules, though the current Board has signaled it may revisit it. In a June 25, 2025 memo (GC 25-07), the Acting General Counsel told regional offices to treat secretly recording collective-bargaining sessions as an unfair labor practice; that is enforcement guidance, not a Board ruling, and it does not address ordinary workplace conversations. The NLRA does not cover supervisors, independent contractors, agricultural or domestic workers, or government employees.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has addressed employer no-recording policies in several key decisions:
- Blanket no-recording policies may be unlawful if they would reasonably tend to chill employees' exercise of Section 7 rights
- Policies that specifically target recording of protected concerted activity are likely unlawful
- Employers can maintain narrowly tailored recording policies that serve legitimate business interests without broadly restricting protected activity
Employees who record workplace conditions, safety hazards, or evidence of unfair labor practices may be protected from retaliation under the NLRA, even if the employer has a no-recording policy.
Recording Specific Workplace Situations

Recording a Boss Who Is Harassing You
Recording a supervisor who is engaging in harassment is one of the most common reasons employees record at work. In West Virginia, you can legally record:
- Verbal abuse or hostile comments directed at you
- Sexually inappropriate remarks or advances
- Racially motivated comments or slurs
- Retaliatory threats for filing complaints
- Any conversation you participate in where harassment occurs
These recordings can be valuable evidence in harassment claims filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or in state court.
Recording HR Meetings
You can record meetings with HR representatives in West Virginia without their knowledge. This is often advisable when:
- You are filing or discussing a complaint
- You believe you may be subject to disciplinary action
- You are negotiating a separation agreement or severance package
- You want an accurate record of what HR promises or commits to
Recording Disciplinary Meetings and Terminations
Employees facing disciplinary action or termination can record these conversations. The recording provides:
- An accurate record of the stated reasons for discipline or termination
- Evidence of whether proper procedures were followed
- Documentation of any discriminatory or retaliatory statements
- Protection against later claims that the employee was informed of things that were not actually said
Wearable Recording Devices at Work
Wearable devices such as AI voice recorders, smart glasses, and smartwatches with recording capabilities are increasingly used in workplace settings. Under West Virginia's one-party consent law, employees can use these devices to record conversations they participate in. However:
- Employer wearable recording device policies may restrict their use on company premises
- Some workplaces (such as classified government facilities or certain manufacturing environments) may have security-based restrictions on electronic devices
- Smart glasses that record video raise additional considerations under W. Va. Code 61-8-28 if pointed at areas with privacy expectations
Workplace Recording as Evidence
Employment Discrimination Cases
Recordings made in the workplace are frequently used as evidence in employment discrimination cases. Employees offer legally obtained recordings to the EEOC or a court to show:
- Discriminatory comments or attitudes by supervisors
- A pattern of harassment
- Retaliatory actions following protected complaints
- Disparate treatment compared to other employees
- Hostile work environment conditions
Workers' Compensation Cases
Workplace recordings may be relevant in workers' compensation proceedings, particularly when documenting:
- The circumstances surrounding a workplace injury
- Employer knowledge of unsafe conditions
- Statements about the cause or nature of an injury
- Compliance or non-compliance with safety requirements
Wrongful Termination Cases
In wrongful termination litigation, recordings can provide powerful evidence of:
- The real reason for termination (as opposed to the stated reason)
- Pretext for discrimination or retaliation
- Promises made by the employer about job security
- Violation of established termination procedures
Admissibility Standards
Whether a lawful one-party recording can be used in a West Virginia civil case at all is unsettled. Read literally, W. Va. Code 62-1D-6 lets evidence obtained by interception be received only in grand jury and criminal proceedings. A participant's own recording may fall outside that limit, because W. Va. Code 62-1D-2 excludes any device used in lawful consensual monitoring from the definition of an intercepting device. We found no West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals decision that settles the point, so the judge in your case decides. Ask a West Virginia lawyer before relying on a recording.
If a court allows it, a workplace recording must be:
- Legally obtained under the one-party consent rule
- Authentic and verifiable as genuine
- Relevant to the issues in the case
- Not unduly prejudicial compared to their probative value
Recordings that are edited, spliced, or selectively presented may face authenticity challenges. Preserve the original file and maintain a clear chain of custody.
Penalties for Illegal Workplace Recording
Criminal Penalties
Illegal recording in the workplace carries the same penalties as any other wiretapping violation under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3:
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Illegal interception of workplace communications | Felony | Up to 5 years imprisonment, up to $10,000 fine, or both |
| Disclosing illegally recorded workplace conversations | Felony | Up to 5 years imprisonment, up to $10,000 fine, or both |
Civil Liability
Under W. Va. Code 62-1D-12, victims of illegal workplace recording can sue for:
- Actual damages or $100 per day of violation, whichever is greater
- Punitive damages
- Attorney fees and court costs
Employment Consequences
Even when recording is legal under state law, violating a company no-recording policy can result in:
- Written warnings or reprimands
- Suspension
- Termination
- Loss of severance benefits
- Damage to professional reputation and references
Best Practices for Workplace Recording in West Virginia
For Employees
- Understand your rights under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3 before recording
- Review your employer's recording policy before making recordings
- Record full conversations from beginning to end rather than selective portions
- Store recordings securely and share them only with your attorney
- Document the date, time, location, and participants for each recording
- Consider the strategic implications before revealing that you have recordings
- Consult an employment attorney before using recordings in legal proceedings
For Employers
- Develop a clear, written recording policy and include it in the employee handbook
- Ensure the policy is narrowly tailored to avoid NLRA conflicts
- Post visible notices of video surveillance in monitored areas
- Never install audio recording devices to capture conversations without participant consent
- Never place cameras or other surveillance in restrooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, or employee lounges (W. Va. Code 21-3-20)
- Train managers on the legal boundaries of workplace surveillance
- Consult legal counsel before implementing monitoring programs
More West Virginia Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to West Virginia Recording Laws
More West Virginia Recording Topics
More West Virginia Laws
- West Virginia AI Meeting Recording Laws
- West Virginia Dashcam Laws
- West Virginia Data Privacy Laws
- West Virginia Deepfake Laws
- West Virginia Employee Monitoring Laws
- West Virginia GPS Tracking Laws
- West Virginia Police Bodycam Laws
- West Virginia Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my boss in West Virginia without telling them?
Yes. Under W. Va. Code 62-1D-3, you can record any workplace conversation you participate in without informing your boss or other participants. However, your employer may have a policy against recording, and violating that policy could result in disciplinary action or termination.
Can my employer record me at work in West Virginia?
Your employer can use video surveillance in common work areas like sales floors, warehouses, and lobbies. Audio recording requires one-party consent, meaning a management participant must be part of the recorded conversation. Under W. Va. Code 21-3-20, employers cannot use video or other surveillance in restrooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, or employee lounges.
Can I be fired for recording at work in West Virginia?
Yes, if your employer has a no-recording policy. West Virginia is an at-will employment state, and violating a company policy can be grounds for termination. However, if you recorded evidence of illegal activity, harassment, or safety violations, firing you may constitute unlawful retaliation.
Does the NLRA protect employees who record at work?
The National Labor Relations Act protects employees who engage in concerted activity for mutual aid and protection. Recording workplace conditions, safety hazards, or evidence of unfair labor practices may be protected. Blanket employer no-recording policies that chill protected activity may be unlawful.
Can workplace recordings be used as evidence in court in West Virginia?
It is unsettled. Employment discrimination, wrongful termination, harassment, and workers' compensation cases are civil matters, and whether a lawful one-party recording can be used in a West Virginia civil case is an open question. W. Va. Code 62-1D-6 lets intercepted evidence be received only in grand jury and criminal proceedings, and no West Virginia Supreme Court decision says whether a participant's own recording falls inside that limit, so ask a West Virginia lawyer first. If a court allows it, the recording must be authenticated and relevant to the case.
Updates
We aligned a key takeaway with the body: federal labor law may protect, rather than always protects, employees who record as part of concerted activity.
We corrected statements that West Virginia civil and family courts generally admit lawful one-party recordings: W. Va. Code 62-1D-6 limits intercepted evidence to grand jury and criminal proceedings, and no West Virginia appellate decision has settled whether a participant's own recording falls inside that limit.
We corrected this page to state that W. Va. Code 21-3-20 bans employer surveillance in restrooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, and employee lounges without exception, that notice to employees is not consent to monitor calls, to describe NLRB memos GC 25-05 and GC 25-07 and the status of Stericycle accurately, and to explain that West Virginia's Whistleblower Law covers only public employees.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Removed a duplicated section and added the missing statute citation for the employer surveillance prohibition.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Corrected the W. Va. Code § 21-3-20 penalty description (repeated twice in the article, both instances fixed): a violation is a misdemeanor criminal conviction with escalating fines, not a civil penalty.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
West Virginia Code
§ 62-1D-3Interception of communications generally.In forcecited in 36 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this article it is unlawful for any person to: (1) Intentionally intercept, attempt to intercept or procure any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept, any wire, oral or electronic communication; or (2) Intentionally disclose or intentionally attempt to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in violation of this article; and (3) Intentionally use or disclose or intentionally attempt to use or disclose the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication or the identity of any party thereto, knowing or having reason to know that such information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in violation of this article. (b) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for not more than five years or fined not more than $10,000 or both fined and imprisoned.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1999
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1999, 200 F.3d 109)“…77 -23a-4, 77-23a-11; Va. Code Ann. §§ 19.2-62 , 19.2-69; W. Va.Code §§ 62-1D-3, 62-1D-12; Wis. Stat. § 968.31 ; Wyo.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Smart Glasses Recording Laws, US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, One-Party Consent States: Complete 2026 Guide
§ 21-3-20Use of video and other electronic surveillance devices by employers prohibited.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for any employer or the agent or representative of an employer, whether public or private, to operate any electronic surveillance device or system, including, but not limited to, the use of a closed circuit television system, a video-recording device, or any combination of those or other electronic devices for the purpose of recording or monitoring the activities of the employees in areas designed for the health or personal comfort of the employees or for safeguarding of their possessions, such as rest rooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms and employee lounges. (b) Any employer or agent thereof who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, if convicted, shall be fined $500 for the first offense. An employer or agent thereof convicted a second time under this provision shall be fined $1,000. For the third and any subsequent offense, the penalty shall be $2,000.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Blackwood v. Berry Dunn, LLC (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2019)“…out being in an area protected from monitoring by W. Va. Code § 21-3-20, it cannot be said that taking a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, West Virginia AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), West Virginia Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026)
§ 61-8-28Criminal invasion of privacy; penalties.In forcecited in 28 of our articles
(a) For the purposes of this section, the words or terms defined in this subsection have the meanings ascribed to them. These definitions are applicable unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: (1) “A person fully or partially nude” means a male or female who is either clothed or unclothed so that: (A) All or any part of his or her genitals, pubic area or buttocks is visible; or (B) in the case of a female only, a part of a nipple of her breast is visible and is without a fully opaque covering; (2) “To visually portray” a person means to create a reproducible image of that person by means of: (A) A photograph; (B) A motion picture; (C) A video tape; (D) A digital recording; or (E) Any other mechanical or electronic recording process or device that can preserve, for later viewing, a visual image of a person; and (3) “Place where a reasonable person would have an expectation of privacy” means a place where a reasonable person would believe that he or she could, in privacy, be fully or partially nude without expecting that the act of exposing his or her body was being visually portrayed by another person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Imaginary Images, Inc. v. Evans (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2010, 612 F.3d 736)“…8 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7507.1(e); Utah Code Ann. § 76-5a-2(6); W. Va. Code § 61-8-28(a)(1); Wis. Stat. § 942.08(1)(a). The m…”
- United States v. Thoms (U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 2014)“…9-702.7 (West 2013); Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 13, § 2605 (2010); W. Va. Code § 61-8-28 (2000). 4 Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Guide, West Virginia Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights and Rules, West Virginia Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and HIPAA Guide
§ 62-1D-12Civil liability; defense to civil or criminal action.In forcecited in 20 of our articles
(a) Any person whose wire, oral or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, used or whose identity is disclosed in violation of this article shall have a civil cause of action against any person who so intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose, or use the communications, and shall be entitled to recover from any such person or persons: (1) Actual damages, but not less than $100 for each day of violation; (2) Punitive damages, if found to be proper; and (3) Reasonable attorney fees and reasonable costs of litigation incurred. (b) A good faith reliance by a provider of electronic or wire communication services on a court order or legislative authorization constitutes a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this article or any other law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Also relied on in: West Virginia Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules and Consent Guide, West Virginia Security Camera Laws: Rules for Homes and Businesses, West Virginia Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
Sources and References
- W. Va. Code 62-1D-3 - Interception of Communications(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 61-8-28 - Criminal Invasion of Privacy(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 62-1D-12 - Civil Cause of Action(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- NLRA - National Labor Relations Act(nlrb.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 6C-1 - Whistleblower Law(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- EEOC - Filing a Charge of Discrimination(eeoc.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 21-3-20 - Electronic surveillance of employees prohibited(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov