North Carolina
North Carolina School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Campus Rules
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
North Carolina's one-party consent law (N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287) permits students and parents to record any school conversation they participate in without notifying the other party. Recordings that are directly related to a student and maintained by the school qualify as education records under FERPA (20 U.S.C. 1232g) and carry strict privacy and disclosure obligations.
Recording in North Carolina schools involves a complex intersection of state recording law, federal student privacy protections, school district policies, and the rights of parents, students, and educators. While the state's one-party consent law provides a broad right to record conversations you participate in, schools operate under additional layers of regulation that affect when, where, and how recording can take place.
This guide covers the legal framework for recording in North Carolina schools, including student and parent recording rights, school security camera rules, FERPA compliance, IEP meeting recording, and the rights of teachers and staff.
The Legal Framework
State Recording Law
North Carolina's one-party consent law (N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287) applies in school settings the same way it applies everywhere else. If you are a party to a conversation, you can record it without the other person's consent. This means:
- A student can record a conversation with a teacher they are participating in
- A parent can record a conference with a school administrator
- A teacher can record a meeting with a parent or colleague
- A staff member can record an interaction with a student or parent
FERPA: The Federal Privacy Layer
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), codified at 20 U.S.C. 1232g, adds critical privacy protections that affect recording in schools. FERPA:
- Protects the privacy of student education records
- Applies to all schools that receive federal funding (virtually all public schools in North Carolina)
- Defines "education records" broadly to include any records directly related to a student that are maintained by the school
- Gives parents the right to access their child's education records
- Restricts the disclosure of personally identifiable student information without consent
Recordings made by a school that contain information directly related to a student are considered education records under FERPA. This can include a classroom video focused on a particular student, a recording of a disciplinary meeting, or security camera footage the school keeps to discipline the students shown in it. A student who appears only incidentally or in the background is not covered, and footage a school law enforcement unit creates and keeps for a law enforcement purpose is excluded.
N.C. Gen. Stat. 115C-402.5: Student Data Security
North Carolina's student data statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. 115C-402.5, governs the state's student data system, the student information management system run by the State Board of Education and the Department of Public Instruction. For that system it requires:
- A public inventory of the student data fields collected
- Rules restricting who may access personally identifiable student data
- A data security plan, including breach planning, notification, and procedures
- Privacy and security terms in contracts with outside vendors
The statute does not specifically address recordings and does not regulate how individual schools keep them. Recordings a school keeps that are directly related to a student are governed mainly by FERPA and by the district's own records policies.
Parent Recording Rights
Recording Conferences and Meetings
Parents can record their own conversations with school personnel under North Carolina's one-party consent law. Common situations include:
- Parent-teacher conferences: You can record discussions about your child's academic progress
- Disciplinary meetings: Record meetings about suspensions, behavioral issues, or other disciplinary actions
- IEP and 504 plan meetings: Record special education meetings (covered in detail below)
- Meetings with administrators: Record discussions with principals, vice principals, or district officials
- Phone calls with school staff: Record calls about your child's education
Recording in Classrooms
While parents have a general right to record their own conversations, recording inside a classroom raises different issues:
- Other students' privacy: A classroom recording will capture other students. A parent's own recording is not a FERPA education record because the school does not maintain it (unless the school later keeps a copy), but district policy may still limit recording in class to protect students' privacy
- School policy: Most North Carolina school districts have policies that restrict or prohibit recording in classrooms without advance approval
- Disruption: Recording equipment or the act of recording can disrupt the learning environment
- Teacher consent: While not required by state law, schools may require teacher consent as a condition of allowing classroom recording
If you want to record in a classroom (for example, to observe how your child is being treated or to monitor classroom instruction), contact the school administration first and request permission. If the school denies your request, you can escalate through the school district's grievance process.
Recording to Document Bullying
Parents who suspect their child is being bullied can use recordings to document the behavior. Under North Carolina's one-party consent law, your child (if old enough to understand and consent) can record conversations where they are bullied, harassed, or threatened. However:
- Younger children may not have the capacity to meaningfully consent to recording
- State law requires schools to bar student phone use during instructional time, so recordings made in class can lead to discipline
- North Carolina courts allow a custodial parent to consent on a minor child's behalf to recording the child's conversations, but only when the parent has a good-faith, objectively reasonable belief that recording is necessary for the child's best interests (Kroh v. Kroh, 152 N.C. App. 347 (2002)). This is a defense if the recording is challenged, not a blanket permission, and whether the standard is met depends on the facts, so talk to a lawyer before recording your child's conversations without your child knowing
- Recordings of bullying can serve as evidence in complaints to the school district or in legal proceedings
Student Recording Rights
Can Students Record in School?
Students in North Carolina have the same one-party consent recording rights as adults under state law. A student who participates in a conversation can legally record it without informing the other party. However, several practical limitations apply:
- School device policies: Since 2025, every North Carolina public school unit must have a policy that bars students from using, displaying, or having a phone or other wireless device turned on during instructional time (N.C. Gen. Stat. 115C-76.100), unless a teacher allows it for class or an emergency, or the student's IEP, 504 plan, or a documented medical condition requires it. Districts may add stricter rules, and violations can lead to confiscation of the device and discipline
- Classroom rules: Teachers may establish rules against recording in their classrooms
- Disciplinary consequences: Students who violate school recording or device policies can face school discipline (detention, suspension) even if the recording itself is legal under state law
- Age and maturity: Younger students may not understand the implications of recording
Student Recording of Threats or Harassment
Students who record threats, harassment, or inappropriate conduct by other students or school staff are exercising their rights under state recording law. These recordings can be valuable evidence for:
- Complaints to school administration
- Bullying reports
- Reports to law enforcement (for criminal threats or assault)
- Civil lawsuits against the school district for failure to address harassment
Recording IEP and 504 Meetings
Federal Guidance
The federal special education law, the IDEA, does not give parents a right to record IEP meetings. In guidance published with its 1999 regulations (64 FR 12477, Appendix A, Question 21), the U.S. Department of Education said a public agency may prohibit or limit audio or video recording of IEP meetings, but must permit recording when it is needed for the parent to understand the IEP or the IEP process, and state or local policy may allow recording.
North Carolina Practice
In North Carolina, recording an IEP or 504 meeting you attend is not a crime under the state's one-party consent law. That law does not, however, give you a right to record over a school's objection: a district may limit or prohibit recording. For IEP meetings, federal guidance requires the district to allow recording when a parent needs it to understand the IEP or the process; recording a 504 meeting depends on district policy. Best practices include:
- Check the school district's policy: Some NC districts have specific policies about recording IEP meetings. Ask in writing before the meeting, and if you need a recording to follow the meeting (for example, because of a disability or a language barrier), say so.
- Provide advance notice: Notifying the school that you plan to record can reduce tension and allow the team to prepare
- Offer to share the recording: Making the recording available to all team members promotes transparency
- Use the recording for accuracy: The primary purpose should be to ensure you have an accurate record of what was discussed and agreed to
Why Recording IEP Meetings Matters
IEP meetings determine the educational services your child will receive under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Recordings help:
- Ensure the school follows through on agreed-upon services
- Preserve the details of discussions about your child's needs and goals
- Document disagreements or concerns raised during the meeting
- Support due process complaints or mediation requests if disputes arise
- Provide evidence if the school fails to implement the IEP as written
School Security Cameras
Where Schools Can Place Cameras
North Carolina schools can install security cameras for safety and security purposes in:
- Hallways and corridors
- Cafeterias and common areas
- Entrances and exits
- Parking lots and bus loading zones
- Gymnasiums during non-changing periods
- Libraries and media centers
- Outdoor areas including playgrounds and athletic fields
No North Carolina statute prohibits schools from placing cameras in classrooms. Whether a school does so is a district and school board policy decision, not a matter of state law, so practice varies by district.
Where Schools Cannot Place Cameras
Placing cameras in areas where students have a reasonable expectation of privacy creates serious legal risk:
- Bathrooms and restrooms: N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202 (the secret peeping statute) makes it a crime to secretly peep into a rest room, bathroom, shower, or dressing room, and to knowingly capture an image of a person's private area without consent where that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy
- Locker rooms and changing areas: Students changing for physical education or athletics have a heightened privacy expectation
- Showers: Showers are among the rooms 14-202 expressly lists, so recording there carries the same criminal exposure
- Nursing and health rooms: Where students may be in states of undress
School Bus Cameras
Many North Carolina school districts have installed cameras on school buses. These cameras serve safety and disciplinary purposes. Students and parents should be aware that bus cameras may record both video and audio. School districts typically notify parents about bus camera policies at the beginning of the school year.
Teacher and Staff Recording Rights
Can Teachers Record Students?
Teachers in North Carolina can record conversations they participate in under the one-party consent law. However, recording students raises additional considerations:
- FERPA compliance: Recordings the school keeps are education records if they are directly related to a particular student
- School district policy: Teachers should follow their district's policy on recording
- Parental notification: Best practice is to inform parents when recording is taking place in educational settings
- Purpose limitation: Recordings should serve a legitimate educational or safety purpose
Recording for Professional Protection
Teachers who face accusations of misconduct may want to record interactions for their own protection. This is legal under one-party consent but should be done in accordance with school policy. Teachers should consult with their union representative or attorney before recording.
School Policies and Enforcement
Common School Recording Policies
Most North Carolina school districts have adopted policies that address recording on school property. Common provisions include:
- A ban on student device use during instructional time, which state law has required in every public school unit since 2025
- Requirements for advance approval before recording in classrooms
- Prohibitions on recording in certain locations (restrooms, locker rooms)
- Rules about sharing recordings made on school property
- Consequences for violating the recording policy
Balancing Rights and Policies
While North Carolina's one-party consent law makes many school recordings legal, school policies can still restrict recording as a condition of attending or being present on school property. Students who violate recording policies face school discipline, not criminal charges (assuming the recording itself was legal under state law).
Parents who are told they cannot record a meeting should understand the distinction: the school can have a policy against recording, but the recording itself is not illegal under North Carolina law. If a dispute arises, parents should consult with an attorney or the state Department of Public Instruction.
North Carolina Recording Laws by Topic
Phone Call Recording | Audio Recording | Video Recording | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras
Back to North Carolina Recording Laws
More North Carolina Recording Topics
More North Carolina Laws
- North Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws
- North Carolina Dashcam Laws
- North Carolina Data Privacy Laws
- North Carolina Deepfake Laws
- North Carolina Employee Monitoring Laws
- North Carolina GPS Tracking Laws
- North Carolina Police Bodycam Laws
- North Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my child's IEP meeting in North Carolina?
Recording an IEP or 504 meeting you attend is not a crime under North Carolina's one-party consent law, but that law does not give you a right to record over the school's objection. Federal guidance (64 FR 12477, Appendix A, Question 21) lets a school district prohibit or limit recording of IEP meetings, except that it must allow recording when a parent needs it to understand the IEP or the process. Ask about your district's policy and request permission in writing before the meeting. A recording the school keeps is part of your child's education records when it is directly related to your child, as a recording of your child's IEP meeting usually is.
Can students record their teachers in North Carolina?
Students can legally record conversations they participate in under North Carolina's one-party consent law. However, since 2025 every public school unit must bar students from using or having a phone turned on during instructional time (N.C. Gen. Stat. 115C-76.100), and districts may restrict devices further. Violating a school recording policy can result in disciplinary action, even though the recording itself is legal under state law.
Can schools put cameras in classrooms in North Carolina?
Schools can install cameras in classrooms if their district chooses to authorize it. No North Carolina statute prohibits classroom cameras, so whether a given school has them is a district and school board policy decision, not a matter of state law. Cameras in bathrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas risk violating N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202, which criminalizes secretly peeping into such rooms and recording a person's private areas without consent where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Classroom recordings the school keeps that are directly related to a particular student are education records under FERPA and must be handled in compliance with student privacy requirements.
Can I record evidence of my child being bullied at school in North Carolina?
Your child can record conversations where they are being bullied if they are a participant, under the one-party consent law. North Carolina courts allow a custodial parent to consent on a minor child's behalf only when the parent has a good-faith, objectively reasonable belief that recording is necessary for the child's best interests (Kroh v. Kroh, 152 N.C. App. 347 (2002)). That is a defense that depends on the facts, not a blanket permission, so talk to a lawyer before recording your child's conversations without your child knowing. Recordings of bullying can serve as evidence in complaints to the school district or in legal proceedings. Keep in mind that state law requires schools to bar student phone use during instructional time, so a student may face discipline for recording in class.
Are school bus cameras legal in North Carolina?
Yes. School districts can install cameras on school buses for safety and disciplinary purposes. These cameras may record both video and audio. Districts typically notify parents about bus camera policies at the beginning of the school year. Footage can be an education record under FERPA when it is directly related to a particular student (for example, video the school keeps to discipline students in a fight) and the school maintains it; students who appear only incidentally are not covered.
Updates
Clarified that a school-kept recording is an education record when it is directly related to the student.
Noted that a copy of a parent's recording kept by the school can become a FERPA education record, and clarified that the Kroh parental-consent rule covers recording the child's own conversations.
We corrected the IEP section to explain that federal guidance lets a school limit or prohibit recording of IEP meetings unless a parent needs the recording to understand the meeting, added North Carolina's 2025 statewide ban on student phone use during instructional time (G.S. 115C-76.100), and corrected the description of G.S. 115C-402.5, which covers the state's student data system rather than school recordings. Corrected when school recordings are FERPA education records (directly related to a student and kept by the school, not merely identifying one), limited the federal must-allow-recording rule to IEP meetings, and noted that parental consent on a child's behalf to recording is unsettled in North Carolina. Corrected the bullying guidance to state that North Carolina courts let a custodial parent consent for a minor child only with a good-faith, objectively reasonable belief that recording serves the child's best interests (Kroh v. Kroh, 2002), and clarified that a parent's own classroom recording is not a FERPA education record, though district policy may still limit classroom recording.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected how we describe N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202: it criminalizes secret peeping and nonconsensual recording of private areas in rooms like bathrooms and changing areas, rather than banning cameras in those locations outright.
Clarified that North Carolina law does not prohibit classroom security cameras (placement is a district policy choice, not a state-law question), fixing a contradiction between the article body and its FAQ, and added the 'maintained by the school' qualifier FERPA actually requires to two places describing which recordings count as education records.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Fixed ncleg.net URLs to ncleg.gov (4 occurrences).
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 15A: Criminal Procedure Act.
§ 15A-287Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Article, a person is guilty of a Class H felony if, without the consent of at least one party to the communication, the person: (1) Willfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication. (2) Willfully uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when: a. The device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communications; or b. The device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communications.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):North Carolina courts apply Section 15A-287 to private recording. Kroh v. Kroh (2002) held it reaches one spouse's nonconsensual audio recording of the other in the family home, not video without sound, and adopted vicarious consent by a custodial parent. State v. McGriff (2002) held interception is not willful absent a bad purpose.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. McGriff (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2002, 151 N.C. App. 631)✓A neighbor's cordless phone picked up a call in which a girl said McGriff had tried to force oral sex on her, and she listened about an hour; the court held listening out of concern for a minor was not willful interception under Section 15A-287(a)(1), so the evidence came in.
- Wright v. TOWN OF ZEBULON (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2010, 202 N.C. App. 540)✓A police chief hid a transmitter under a sergeant's patrol car seat to test whether he tipped off drug dealers; the court affirmed summary judgment on his Section 15A-287(a)(1) claim, finding the public safety purpose meant the interception was not willful.
- Kroh v. Kroh (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2002, 152 N.C. App. 347)“…rs to intercept, . . . any . . . oral . . . communication.” G.S. § 15A-287(a)(l). An “oral communication” includes…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, North Carolina Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, North Carolina Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 115C: Elementary and Secondary Education.
§ 115C-402.5Student data system securityIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Definitions. - The following definitions apply in this section: (1) Aggregate student data. - Data collected or reported at the group, cohort, or institutional level. (2) De-identified student data. - A student dataset in which parent and student personal or indirect identifiers, including the unique student identifier, have been removed. (3) FERPA. - The federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g. (4) Personally identifiable student data. - Student data that: a. Includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1. Student name. 2. Name of the student's parent or other family members. 3. Address of the student or student's family. 4. Personal identifier, such as the student's Social Security number or unique student identifier. 5. Other indirect identifiers, such as the student's date of birth, place of birth, and mother's maiden name. 6. Other information that, alone or in combination, is linked or linkable to a specific student that would allow a reasonable person in the school community, who does not have personal knowledge of the relevant circumstances, to identify the student with reasonable certainty. 7.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Also relied on in: North Carolina Data Privacy Laws: Consumer Rights & Protections (2026)
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 14: Criminal Law.
§ 14-202Secretly peeping into room occupied by another personIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
(a) Any person who shall peep secretly into any room occupied by another person shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. (a1) Unless covered by another provision of law providing greater punishment, any person who secretly or surreptitiously peeps underneath or through the clothing being worn by another person, through the use of a mirror or other device, for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that other person without their consent shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. (b) The following definitions apply in this section: (1) Photographic image. - Any photograph or photographic reproduction, still or moving, or any videotape, motion picture, or live television transmission, or any digital image of any individual. (2) Private area of an individual. - The naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual. (3) Room. - Includes, but is not limited to, a bedroom, a rest room, a bathroom, a shower, a dressing room, a dressing stall, a cubicle, or other similar area designed to provide privacy. (4) Under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 17 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In Matter of Banks (1978) the North Carolina Supreme Court upheld G.S. 14-202 against vagueness and overbreadth challenges, reading secret peeping to require spying intended to invade the occupant's privacy. State v. Pell (2011) applied its sex offender registration provision and reversed an order unsupported by evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Matter of Banks (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1978, 295 N.C. 236)✓A trial judge held the secret peeping statute unconstitutional. The court reversed, construing the statute to reach only spying done with the wrongful purpose of invading the occupant's privacy, and held it was neither impermissibly vague nor overbroad on that reading.
- State v. Breathette (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2010, 202 N.C. App. 697)“…any child of either sex under the age of 16 years. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-202 .l(a)(l)-(2). The statute is unambiguou…”
- State v. Pell (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2011, 211 N.C. App. 376)✓A man pleaded guilty to eight counts of felony secret peeping and was ordered onto the sex-offender registry. The court held the danger-to-the-community standard in this section is not vague, but reversed the registration order because the risk evidence did not support it.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras and Consent, North Carolina Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules, North Carolina Video Recording Laws: Public, Private, and Voyeurism Rules
United States Code Title 20
§ 1232gFamily educational and privacy rightsIn forcecited in 29 of our articles
No funds shall be made available under any applicable program to any educational agency or institution which has a policy of denying, or which effectively prevents, the parents of students who are or have been in attendance at a school of such agency or at such institution, as the case may be, the right to inspect and review the education records of their children. If any material or document in the education record of a student includes information on more than one student, the parents of one of such students shall have the right to inspect and review only such part of such material or document as relates to such student or to be informed of the specific information contained in such part of such material. Each educational agency or institution shall establish appropriate procedures for the granting of a request by parents for access to the education records of their children within a reasonable period of time, but in no case more than forty-five days after the request has been made.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 981 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have held Section 1232g is enforced by the Secretary of Education, not by suit. Gonzaga University v. Doe (2002) held FERPA's nondisclosure provisions create no personal rights enforceable under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Kate Frazier v. Fairhaven School Committee (2002) held FERPA confers no private right of action, express or implied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Goss v. Lopez (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 419 U.S. 565)“…ucation Amendments of 1974, Pub. L. 93-380, 88 Stat. 571, 20 U. S. C. § 1232g (1970 ed., Supp. IV), adding § 438 to t…”
- Gonzaga University v. Doe (Supreme Court of the United States 2002, 536 U.S. 273)✓A university official told the state teacher-licensing agency about sexual misconduct allegations against a student, who then lost the affidavit he needed to teach; the Supreme Court held FERPA's nondisclosure provisions create no personal rights enforceable under section 1983.
- Foster Children v. Jeb Bush, Kathleen Kearney, Chuck Bates, Robert Williams, Ester Tibbs (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2003, 329 F.3d 1255)“…Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g. In FERPA Congress directed the Secreta…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026), California Recording Laws (2026): All-Party Consent Rules, Connecticut Recording Laws (2026): All-Party Consent for Phone Calls
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 15A: Criminal Procedure Act. § 15A-101 (Definitions)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- N.C. Gen. Stat. Chapter 15A, Article 16 - Electronic Surveillance(ncleg.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 115C - Article 29 - Student Records(ncleg.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202 - Secretly Peeping into Room(ncleg.net).gov
- FERPA - Protecting Student Privacy(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- FERPA Statute - 20 U.S.C. 1232g(law.cornell.edu)
- IDEA - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act(sites.ed.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202 - Secretly Peeping into Room(ncleg.gov).gov