EnglishEspañol
New Jersey flag

New Jersey

New Jersey Laws on Recording in Public: Rights and Restrictions

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New Jersey Laws on Recording in Public: Rights and Restrictions

Updates

Noted that courts may accept an oral request to record when a written request is impracticable, softened an unsourced statement about festival organizers, and replaced an unverified reporter citation for Fuster v. Township of Chatham.

We corrected the page to say that New Jersey's right to record public meetings comes from Tarus v. Borough of Pine Hill, not the Open Public Meetings Act, which does not require bodies to record meetings. We narrowed the First Amendment claims to what Fields actually decided, said that officers can give lawful move-back and dispersal orders at protests, replaced the wrong court-rule citation with the Judiciary's 2024 media and devices guidelines (recording a court proceeding needs written permission), and added the wiretap law's "any other injurious act" limit.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the description of Fields v. City of Philadelphia to the holding the Third Circuit actually reached, which covers recording police officers conducting official activity in public.

Corrected the upskirting penalty classification (recording undergarment-clad intimate parts is a fourth-degree crime, not third degree; third degree applies to recording someone's actually exposed intimate parts or sexual activity), fixed a dead Fields v. City of Philadelphia citation link, narrowed our description of Fuster v. Township of Chatham (2025) to its actual OPRA holding, and removed a dead, mismatched Government Records Council link.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the degree of crime for recording/photographing someone's intimate parts without consent under N.J.S.A. 2C:14-9: it is a third-degree crime, not fourth-degree (fourth-degree applies only to mere observation without recording).

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:156A-4 - Lawful Interception Activities(law.justia.com)
  2. New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act(nj.gov).gov
  3. Fields v. City of Philadelphia, 862 F.3d 353 (3d Cir. 2017)(courtlistener.com)
  4. N.J. Stat. Ann. 2C:14-9 - Invasion of Privacy(law.justia.com)
  5. FAA - Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)(faa.gov).gov
  6. N.J. Supreme Court Guidelines on Media Access and Electronic Devices in the New Jersey Courts (Directive #06-24, July 22, 2024)(njcourts.gov).gov
  7. N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:156A-3 - Prohibited Interception(law.justia.com)
Share: