
Alabama Punitive Damages Laws: Cap, Proof and Wrongful Death (2026)
Alabama requires clear and convincing proof for punitive damages; 6-11-21 generally caps them at the greater of 3x compensatory or $500,000, but not in wrongful death.
52 articles

Alabama requires clear and convincing proof for punitive damages; 6-11-21 generally caps them at the greater of 3x compensatory or $500,000, but not in wrongful death.

Alaska allows punitive damages on clear and convincing proof, generally capped at the greater of 3x compensatory or $500,000; half goes to the state.

Arizona allows punitive damages at common law on clear and convincing proof of an evil mind; no general cap applies, but statutes bar them for public entities.

Arkansas requires clear and convincing proof of malice, reckless disregard or intent for punitive damages; its general cap was struck down in 2011.

California allows exemplary (punitive) damages on clear and convincing proof of oppression, fraud or malice. Civil Code 3294 sets no general cap. Here are the rules.

Connecticut limits common-law punitive damages to litigation expenses less taxable costs; 52-240b allows up to twice the damages awarded against product sellers.

D.C. allows punitive damages at common law when malice or its equivalent is shown by clear and convincing evidence; there is no general cap on awards.

Colorado allows exemplary (punitive) damages only on proof beyond a reasonable doubt, generally capped at actual damages, with up to 3x for conduct during the case.

Louisiana allows exemplary (punitive) damages only where a statute authorizes them, such as drunk driving and child sexual abuse. No general cap applies.

Florida generally caps punitive damages at the greater of 3 times compensatory or $500,000, with exceptions for financial-gain motive, intent to harm and impairment.

Georgia generally caps punitive damages at $250,000 (O.C.G.A. 51-12-5.1), with no cap for product liability, specific intent to harm or impaired defendants.

Hawaii allows punitive damages at common law under the 2025 Guieb test, proved by clear and convincing evidence; no general cap applies and the State is exempt.

Idaho Code 6-1604 requires clear and convincing proof, bars punitive claims in the original complaint, and generally caps awards at the greater of $250,000 or 3x.

Indiana generally caps punitive damages at the greater of 3x compensatory or $50,000, sends 75% to a state victims fund, and bars them in wrongful death cases.

Iowa allows punitive damages for willful and wanton conduct with no general cap; unless the conduct targeted the claimant, a claimant often keeps at most 25%.

Kansas punitive damages need clear and convincing proof, the court sets the amount, and K.S.A. 60-3702 generally caps them at the lesser of income or $5 million.

Kentucky allows punitive damages on clear and convincing proof of oppression, fraud or malice under KRS 411.184, with no general cap under Const. s. 54.

Maine allows punitive damages only on clear and convincing proof of malice, plus a compensatory award. No general cap; $500,000 punitive cap in wrongful death.

Maryland allows punitive damages on clear and convincing proof of actual malice (Zenobia). There is no general cap, and the noneconomic cap excludes them.

Michigan allows punitive damages only when a statute authorizes them. Common-law exemplary damages compensate injured feelings, and there is no general cap.

Minnesota allows punitive damages only on clear and convincing proof of deliberate disregard (549.20), with no general cap and a leave-to-plead rule.

Mississippi punitive damages require clear and convincing proof (11-1-65) and are generally capped by the defendant's net worth, with felony and intoxication exceptions.

Missouri requires clear and convincing proof for punitive damages, generally caps them at the greater of $500,000 or 5x the net judgment, and takes a 50% lien.

Montana punitive damages require actual fraud or actual malice by clear and convincing evidence; the cap is generally the lesser of $10 million or 3% of net worth.

Nevada allows punitive damages on clear and convincing proof of oppression, fraud or malice, generally capped at 3x compensatory or $300,000, with exceptions.

New Jersey allows punitive damages on clear and convincing proof of actual malice; the cap is generally 5x compensatory or $350,000, with listed exceptions.

New Mexico allows punitive damages with no general cap; medical malpractice claims arising on or after May 20, 2026 need clear and convincing proof and face caps.

New York allows punitive damages for exceptional misconduct with no general statutory cap, but not against the State, and insurance generally cannot cover them.

North Carolina allows punitive damages under G.S. Chapter 1D on clear and convincing proof, generally capped at 3x compensatory or $250,000, with exceptions such as DWI.

North Dakota exemplary (punitive) damages need clear and convincing proof of oppression, fraud or malice; the cap is generally the greater of 2x or $250,000.

Ohio generally caps punitive damages at twice compensatory damages (R.C. 2315.21), with a lower limit for small employers and individuals and a felony exception.

Oklahoma punitive damages (23 O.S. 9.1): clear and convincing proof, a jury-set amount, caps starting at $100,000 or actual damages, and no cap in Category III.

Oregon allows punitive damages on clear and convincing proof of malice or reckless indifference, with no general cap, but sends 70% of most awards to state accounts.

Pennsylvania allows punitive damages at common law with no general cap; MCARE limits them to 200% for individual physicians except intentional misconduct.

Delaware allows common-law punitive damages for conscious indifference, not gross negligence, with no general cap; wrongful death and med mal need separate findings.

Illinois allows punitive damages at common law with no general statutory cap in force since Best (1997), but bars them in malpractice cases and against local government.

Massachusetts allows punitive damages only where a statute authorizes them. The wrongful death law sets a $5,000 minimum with no general cap.

Nebraska bars punitive damages on state-law claims under Neb. Const. art. VII, s. 5. Federal 1983 claims and sister-state judgments are exceptions.

New Hampshire bars punitive damages unless a statute provides for them (RSA 507:16). Courts may award enhanced compensatory damages for malicious conduct.

Washington allows punitive damages only where a statute expressly authorizes them. There is no general cap; some statutes set their own limits.

Punitive damages laws in all 50 states and DC: which states allow them, which cap them, the burden of proof, state shares of awards and federal limits.

Rhode Island allows punitive damages at common law for conduct amounting to criminality, with no general cap; some statutes set limits for specific claims.

South Carolina requires clear and convincing proof of wilful, wanton or reckless conduct; 15-32-530 generally caps awards at the greater of 3x or $500,000, as adjusted.

South Dakota allows punitive damages under SDCL 21-3-2 after a judge finds a reasonable basis by clear and convincing evidence; there is no general cap.

Tennessee requires clear and convincing proof for punitive damages and generally caps them at the greater of 2x compensatory damages or $500,000, with four exceptions.

Texas exemplary damages need clear and convincing proof of fraud, malice or gross negligence and are generally capped by CPRC 41.008, with felony exceptions.

Utah requires clear and convincing proof for most punitive damages, sets no general cap, and splits amounts over $50,000 equally with the State.

Vermont allows punitive damages at common law for outrageous conduct plus malice; no general cap, some claim-specific limits; towns are generally immune.

Virginia generally caps punitive damages at $350,000 against all defendants (8.01-38.1), with special rules for drunk driving, hit-and-run and fair housing.

West Virginia generally caps punitive damages at the greater of four times compensatory damages or $500,000 and requires clear and convincing proof (55-7-29).

Wisconsin generally caps punitive damages at twice compensatory damages or $200,000, whichever is greater (895.043), with no cap for intoxicated vehicle operation.

Wyoming allows punitive (exemplary) damages for willful and wanton misconduct under case law, with no general statutory cap and a bar against government entities.