Nebraska
Punitive Damages in Nebraska: Barred by the State Constitution
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 18, 2026). · 17 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Nebraska does not allow punitive damages on state-law claims: the Nebraska Supreme Court has held that "punitive, vindictive, or exemplary damages contravene Neb. Const, art. VII, § 5, and thus are not allowed in this jurisdiction" (Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. Cox, 232 Neb. 846, 443 N.W.2d 566 (1989)). Because there are no punitive damages, there is no punitive damages cap and no general state share, though some penalty-type statutory amounts, such as the additional wage-claim recovery under Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1232, go entirely to the schools.
Two exceptions come from federal law: punitive damages can be recovered in a Nebraska court on a federal claim such as 42 U.S.C. 1983, and Nebraska must enforce another state's judgment that includes them. Bills to change the rule, LB25 (2023) and LB57 (2024), did not become law; their punitive damages provisions never passed. For how other states compare, see punitive damages laws by state.
Information last verified on 2026-10-18. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers Nebraska law on punitive damages in civil cases: Neb. Const. art. VII, s. 5, the Nebraska Supreme Court decisions applying it, and the statutes named below. It does not cover compensatory damages generally, wrongful-death procedure, deadlines and beneficiaries (see Nebraska wrongful death law), the federal law of punitive damages (the hub covers it), or every statute that provides increased, liquidated or presumed damages for a particular claim beyond those named here.
Does Nebraska allow punitive damages?
No, not on claims under Nebraska law. The bar comes from the state constitution as the Nebraska Supreme Court reads it, not from a statute.
In Abel v. Conover, 170 Neb. 926, 104 N.W.2d 684 (1960), the court stated the rule:
"It has been a fundamental rule of law in this state that punitive, vindictive, or exemplary damages will not be allowed, and that the measure of recovery in all civil cases is compensation for the injury sustained."
In Distinctive Printing (1989), the court tied the rule to the constitution: "the fact remains that punitive, vindictive, or exemplary damages contravene Neb. Const, art. VII, § 5, and thus are not allowed in this jurisdiction."
Nebraska courts use "punitive," "vindictive" and "exemplary" for the same thing: damages meant to punish rather than to compensate.
Why: Article VII, section 5 of the Nebraska Constitution
Article VII, section 5(1) provides that, except as provided in subsections (2) and (3), "all fines, penalties, and license money arising under the general laws of the state" (apart from fines and penalties for overloading vehicles on public roads) "shall belong and be paid over to the counties respectively where the same may be levied or imposed." It continues: "All such fines, penalties, and license money shall be appropriated exclusively to the use and support of the common schools in the respective subdivisions where the same may accrue," with a separate split for vehicle-overloading fines.

The Supreme Court has read this to mean that a penalty cannot be paid to a private litigant. The Legislature's annotation to art. VII, s. 5 summarizes Abel v. Conover this way: "Statute providing for recovery of treble damages in civil action was unconstitutional."
The line falls between penalties and compensation. In Distinctive Printing, the court held that the parental-liability statute (Neb. Rev. Stat. 43-801) imposes neither a fine nor a penalty and does not award punitive damages, because the damages it allows are measured by, and limited to, actual injury.
Exceptions: federal claims and other states' judgments
Federal claims in Nebraska courts. In State ex rel. Cherry v. Burns, 258 Neb. 216, 602 N.W.2d 477 (1999), the Nebraska Supreme Court explained:
"We have held that ordinarily, with respect to state causes of action, punitive damages contravene Neb. Const, art. 7, § 5, and are not allowed. ... However, Russell has brought his claim in state court under federal civil rights law, § 1983, and the U.S. Supreme Court has held that punitive damages are recoverable under § 1983 'when the defendant's conduct is shown to be motivated by evil motive or intent, or when it involves reckless or callous indifference to the federally protected rights of others.'"
So on a section 1983 claim, the federal standard governs, even in a Nebraska courtroom. Federal punitive damages law, including the U.S. Supreme Court's due-process limits on award size, is on the punitive damages hub.
Judgments from other states. In Miller v. Kingsley, 194 Neb. 123, 230 N.W.2d 472 (1975), three consolidated cases sought to register Kansas judgments that each included punitive damages, and the trial court had dismissed them as repugnant to Nebraska law. The Nebraska Supreme Court held that "A state may not refuse to enforce a judgment of a foreign state on the ground that it would result in a violation of the public policy of the forum state," and it reversed.
State employees. The statute on indemnifying state officials and employees addresses punitive awards: "any portion of an award or settlement which is for punitive damages may only be paid with the approval of the Legislature" (Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-8,239.05(4)).
Is there a cap on punitive damages in Nebraska?
There is no punitive damages cap because punitive damages are not awarded on state-law claims. What Nebraska statutes do instead is allow increased or presumed amounts tied to the actual harm, and some of those carry their own limits:
- Consumer Protection Act. Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 59-1609, "the court may in its discretion, increase the award of damages to an amount which bears a reasonable relation to the actual damages which have been sustained and which damages are not susceptible of measurement by ordinary pecuniary standards; except that such increased award for violation of section 59-1602 shall not exceed one thousand dollars."
- Intimate images. Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-3505(a), "if the actual damages are incapable of being quantified or difficult to quantify," a plaintiff may recover "presumed damages not to exceed ten thousand dollars against each defendant in an amount that bears a reasonable relationship to the probable damages incurred by the prevailing plaintiff," plus "an amount equal to any monetary gain made by the defendant from disclosure of the intimate image." None of these items is labeled punitive.
- Trade secrets. Neb. Rev. Stat. 87-504 allows "the actual loss caused by misappropriation" and unjust enrichment, or "a reasonable royalty for a misappropriator's unauthorized disclosure or use of a trade secret." It contains no exemplary-damages clause.
- Wage claims. An employee who wins a wage claim "shall be entitled to recover the full amount of the judgment and all costs of such suit, including reasonable attorney's fees" (Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1231(1), as amended by LB847, effective July 18, 2026). The subsection contains no multiplied damages. A separate section, 48-1232, provides that an additional amount equal to the judgment "may be recovered from the employer," or, if the nonpayment of wages is found to be willful, "an amount equal to two times the amount of unpaid wages shall be recovered from the employer," and that any such amount "shall be remitted to the State Treasurer for distribution in accordance with Article VII, section 5"; it goes to the schools, not to the employee.
A treble-damages statute that does not pay the plaintiff. Neb. Rev. Stat. 28-926(1) says a person who commits oppression under color of office "shall be answerable to the party so injured, deceived, or harmed or oppressed in treble damages." The annotations to the statute cite Cole v. Wilson, 11 Neb. App. 837, 661 N.W.2d 706 (2003), for the points that the section "is purely criminal in nature and does not provide for an independent civil remedy" and that "Treble damages under this section would not be payable to the individual who was oppressed."
Does Nebraska take a share of the award?
There is no general split-recovery statute, because no punitive damages are awarded on state-law claims. Some statutes send a penalty-type amount entirely to the schools instead, for example the additional wage-claim recovery under Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1232. The constitution works the other way: under art. VII, s. 5(1), fines and penalties belong to the counties and the common schools, which is why a penalty cannot go to a private litigant.
Wrongful death and defamation
Wrongful death. Nebraska's wrongful death statute provides: "The verdict or judgment should be for the amount of damages which the persons in whose behalf the action is brought have sustained. The avails thereof shall be paid to and distributed among the widow or widower and next of kin in the proportion that the pecuniary loss suffered by each bears to the total pecuniary loss suffered by all such persons" (Neb. Rev. Stat. 30-810). The constitutional bar on punitive damages applies to these state-law claims as to others. Who brings the claim, and the deadline, are on the Nebraska wrongful death page.
Libel and invasion of privacy. Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-840.01 limits a libel or privacy plaintiff to special damages "unless correction was requested as herein provided and was not published," and it "shall not apply if it is alleged and proved that the publication was prompted by actual malice, and actual malice shall not be inferred or presumed from the publication." That limit concerns compensatory damages; punitive damages remain barred. See Nebraska defamation laws.
Statutes that mention punitive damages only to exclude them
A few Nebraska statutes use the words "punitive damages" to say they are not owed or not reimbursed:

- Neb. Rev. Stat. 8-3212(d) (Uniform Special Deposits Act, 2025): a financial institution holding a special deposit that does not comply with the account agreement or the act is liable only for damages proximately caused by the noncompliance, and "Except as provided by other law of this state, the financial institution is not liable for consequential, special, or punitive damages."
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 86-5,106(1)(d)(i): "A property owner is not entitled to reimbursement from an electric utility or commercial broadband supplier for the cost of any appraisal, attorney's fees, or award for special, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages."
Attempts to change the rule
LB25 (2023-2024). As introduced, LB25 would have authorized punitive damages, with awards sent to the state for the schools; its committee statement describes "Section 6: Punitive damages awarded are remitted to the State Treasurer for distribution," and the committee amendment would have required proof "by clear and convincing evidence that the other party acted in a willfully reckless manner." In April 2024 an amendment struck the bill's original sections, and the version on Final Reading was a Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act change "to allow tort claims involving child abuse or sexual assault of a child under the act," with no punitive damages provision. That version "Passed on Final Reading 28-17-4" on April 18, 2024, and was "Returned by Governor without approval on April 24, 2024." The Legislature's news service reported that senators "did not have an opportunity to attempt to override that action." No punitive damages provision was passed.
LB57 (2024 special session). LB57, a 2024 First Special Session bill on tort claims against political subdivisions and the state that would also have allowed punitive damages in civil cases, was "Indefinitely Postponed pursuant to Rule 9, Sec. 8" on August 20, 2024.
Nebraska punitive damages at a glance
| Question | Nebraska rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Available on state-law claims | No | Distinctive Printing (Neb. 1989); Abel v. Conover (Neb. 1960) |
| Basis of the bar | Fines and penalties belong to the common schools | Neb. Const. art. VII, s. 5 |
| Federal section 1983 claims in state court | Available under the federal standard | State ex rel. Cherry v. Burns (Neb. 1999) |
| Other states' judgments with punitive damages | Must be enforced | Miller v. Kingsley (Neb. 1975) |
| Cap | Not applicable on state-law claims; some statutes limit increased or presumed damages | Neb. Rev. Stat. 59-1609; 25-3505 |
| State share | Not applicable; no general split-recovery statute (penalty-type amounts such as the 48-1232 wage-claim recovery go to the schools) | Neb. Const. art. VII, s. 5; Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1232 |
| Wrongful death | Damages the beneficiaries sustained; no punitive damages under state law | Neb. Rev. Stat. 30-810 |
| State employees | Punitive portion of an award paid only with Legislature approval | Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-8,239.05(4) |
| Recent bills | LB25's punitive provisions removed before passage (the vetoed 2024 version concerned tort claims against political subdivisions); LB57 indefinitely postponed (2024) | Bill histories; LB25 Final Reading text |
Related pages
This article provides general legal information about Nebraska punitive damages law as of 2026-10-18. It is not legal advice. For advice about a specific situation, contact a lawyer licensed in Nebraska.
Last updated: 2026-10-18.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Nebraska allow punitive damages?
Not on state-law claims. The Nebraska Supreme Court held in Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. Cox (1989) that punitive, vindictive or exemplary damages contravene Neb. Const. art. VII, s. 5 and are not allowed. They can be recovered in Nebraska courts on a federal claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (State ex rel. Cherry v. Burns, 1999).
Why doesn't Nebraska allow punitive damages?
Neb. Const. art. VII, s. 5 provides that fines and penalties arising under the general laws of the state belong to the counties and must be used exclusively for the support of the common schools. The Nebraska Supreme Court has held that punitive damages contravene that provision.
Is there a cap on punitive damages in Nebraska?
No cap applies because punitive damages are not awarded on Nebraska state-law claims. Some statutes limit increased or presumed damages tied to actual harm, for example the $1,000 limit on an increased award for a 59-1602 violation under Neb. Rev. Stat. 59-1609.
Are punitive damages available on a federal civil rights claim in a Nebraska court?
Yes. In State ex rel. Cherry v. Burns (1999), the Nebraska Supreme Court noted that punitive damages are ordinarily not allowed on state causes of action, but that the U.S. Supreme Court has held them recoverable under section 1983 when the defendant's conduct is motivated by evil motive or intent or involves reckless or callous indifference to federally protected rights.
Will Nebraska enforce another state's punitive damages judgment?
Yes. In Miller v. Kingsley (1975), the Nebraska Supreme Court reversed after Kansas judgments that included punitive damages were refused enforcement, stating that a state may not refuse to enforce a judgment of a foreign state on the ground that it would violate the forum state's public policy.
Are punitive damages available in a Nebraska wrongful death case?
Not under Nebraska law. The wrongful death statute provides that the verdict or judgment should be for the amount of damages the persons for whom the action is brought have sustained (Neb. Rev. Stat. 30-810), and the constitutional bar on punitive damages applies to state-law claims.
Did Nebraska pass a law allowing punitive damages?
No. LB25 (2023) would have authorized punitive damages, but its punitive provisions were replaced before the version that passed 28-17-4, a change to the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act on child-abuse claims, which was returned by the Governor without approval on April 24, 2024. LB57, a 2024 special session bill that included punitive damages, was indefinitely postponed on August 20, 2024.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 81: STATE ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS
§ 81-8,239.05Indemnification of state officials and employees; when; Attorney General; duties; attorney's fees; reportIn force
(1) The State of Nebraska shall indemnify its officials and employees and its past officials and employees for money damages and reasonable costs incurred as a result of an act or omission occurring in the course and scope of employment of such official or employee after May 22, 1981. Such official's or employee's right to indemnification shall include the payments of awards, settlements, and associated costs, including appeal bonds and reasonable costs and attorney's fees associated with a required appearance by agency legal counsel or other legal counsel hired, with prior approval of the Attorney General, to represent the agency, official, or employee before any tribunal. (2) Subsection (1) of this section shall not apply in case of malfeasance in office or willful or wanton neglect of duty. This section shall not be interpreted as an expansion of any state official's or employee's personal liability. (3) The Attorney General shall notify the Risk Manager when an official or employee is being represented by the Attorney General or has engaged competent counsel approved by the Attorney General.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 59: MONOPOLIES AND UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT OF TRADE
§ 59-1609Civil action for damagesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Any person who is injured in his or her business or property by a violation of sections 59-1602 to 59-1606, whether such injured person dealt directly or indirectly with the defendant, or any person so injured because he or she refuses to accede to a proposal for an arrangement which, if consummated, would be in violation of sections 59-1603 to 59-1606, may bring a civil action in the district court to enjoin further violations, to recover the actual damages sustained by him or her, or both, together with the costs of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee, and the court may in its discretion, increase the award of damages to an amount which bears a reasonable relation to the actual damages which have been sustained and which damages are not susceptible of measurement by ordinary pecuniary standards; except that such increased award for violation of section 59-1602 shall not exceed one thousand dollars. For the purpose of this section, person shall include the counties, the municipalities, and all political subdivisions of this state.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Also relied on in: Nebraska Scam and Fraud Laws (2026): Where to Report, Right to Sue
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 30: DECEDENTS' ESTATES; PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY
§ 30-810Action for wrongful death; limitation; in whose name brought; judgment; disposition of avails; compromise of claim; procedureIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
Every such action, as described in section 30-809, shall be commenced within two years after the death of such person. It shall be brought by and in the name of the person's personal representative for the exclusive benefit of the widow or widower and next of kin. The verdict or judgment should be for the amount of damages which the persons in whose behalf the action is brought have sustained. The avails thereof shall be paid to and distributed among the widow or widower and next of kin in the proportion that the pecuniary loss suffered by each bears to the total pecuniary loss suffered by all such persons. A personal representative shall not compromise or settle a claim for damages hereunder until the court by which he or she was appointed shall first have consented to and approved the terms thereof.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 35 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Williams v. Monarch Transportation, Inc. (Nebraska Supreme Court 1991, 238 Neb. 354)“…cerning the amount of recovery in a wrongful death action, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-810 (Reissue 1989) in pertinent part provi…”
- Kelly v. Saint Francis Med. Ctr. (Nebraska Supreme Court 2017, 295 Neb. 650)“…entative for the benefit of the next of kin, as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-810 (Reissue 1995). The attorney resumed…”
- Paulk v. Central Laboratory Associates, P.C. (Nebraska Supreme Court 2001, 262 Neb. 838)“…tion of the avails of any judgment obtained are defined by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-810 (Reissue 1995). Section 30-810 provide…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Nebraska Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Medical Malpractice Laws in Nebraska (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Nebraska (2026): Deadlines
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 25: COURTS; CIVIL PROCEDURE
§ 25-3505RemediesIn force
(a) In an action under the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act, a prevailing plaintiff may recover as compensation: (1)(A) economic and noneconomic damages proximately caused by the defendant's disclosure or threatened disclosure, including damages for emotional distress whether or not accompanied by other damages; or (B) if the actual damages are incapable of being quantified or difficult to quantify, presumed damages not to exceed ten thousand dollars against each defendant in an amount that bears a reasonable relationship to the probable damages incurred by the prevailing plaintiff. In determining the amount of presumed damages under subdivision (a)(1)(B) of this section, consideration must be given to the age of the parties at the time of the disclosure or threatened disclosure, the number of disclosures or threatened disclosures made by the defendant, the breadth of distribution of the image by the defendant, and other exacerbating or mitigating factors; and (2) an amount equal to any monetary gain made by the defendant from disclosure of the intimate image.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
§ 25-840.01Libel; invasion of privacy; damages; retraction; effectIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) In an action for damages for the publication of a libel or for invasion of privacy as provided by section 20-204 by any medium, the plaintiff shall recover no more than special damages unless correction was requested as herein provided and was not published. Within twenty days after knowledge of the publication, plaintiff shall have given each defendant a notice by certified or registered mail specifying the statements claimed to be libelous or to have invaded privacy as provided by section 20-204 and specifically requesting correction. Publication of a correction shall be made within three weeks after receipt of the request. It shall be made in substantially as conspicuous a manner as the original publication about which complaint was made. A correction, published prior to receipt of a request therefor, shall have the same force and effect as if published after such request. The term special damages, as used in this section, shall include only such damages as plaintiff alleges and proves were suffered in respect to his or her property, business, trade, profession, or occupation as the direct and proximate result of the defendant's publication.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Turner v. Welliver (Nebraska Supreme Court 1987, 226 Neb. 275)“…be inferred or presumed from publication. Finally, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-840.01 (Reissue 1985) provides in pertinent p…”
- Nolan v. Campbell (Nebraska Court of Appeals 2004, 13 Neb. Ct. App. 212)“…lan sent a retraction request for each of them pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-840.01 (Reissue 1995). Campbell did not respo…”
- Funk v. Lincoln-Lancaster Cty. Crime Stoppers (Nebraska Supreme Court 2016, 294 Neb. 715)“…on and was therefore limited to special damages pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-840.01 (Reissue 2008). After it was deter- min…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Nebraska Defamation Laws: Libel & Slander (2026)
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 28: CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
§ 28-926Oppression under color of office; penaltyIn force
(1) Any public servant or peace officer who, by color of or in the execution of his office, shall designedly, willfully, or corruptly injure, deceive, harm, or oppress any person, or shall attempt to injure, deceive, harm, or oppress any person, commits oppression under color of office, and shall be answerable to the party so injured, deceived, or harmed or oppressed in treble damages. (2) Oppression under color of office is a Class II misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. Cox, 232 Neb. 846, 443 N.W.2d 566 (Neb. 1989)(static.case.law)
- Abel v. Conover, 170 Neb. 926, 104 N.W.2d 684 (Neb. 1960)(static.case.law)
- Neb. Const. art. VII, s. 5: Fines, penalties, and license money(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- State ex rel. Cherry v. Burns, 258 Neb. 216, 602 N.W.2d 477 (Neb. 1999)(static.case.law)
- Miller v. Kingsley, 194 Neb. 123, 230 N.W.2d 472 (Neb. 1975)(static.case.law)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-8,239.05: Indemnification of state officials and employees(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 59-1609: Civil action for damages(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-3505: Remedies(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 87-504 (trade secrets; damages)(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1231 (wage claims; recovery and attorney fees)(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 28-926: Oppression under color of office; penalty(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 30-810: Action for wrongful death; judgment; disposition of avails(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-840.01: Libel; invasion of privacy; damages; retraction(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 8-3212: Duties and liability of financial institution (special deposits)(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 86-5,106 (reimbursement by electric utility or broadband supplier)(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- LB25 (108th Legislature, 2023-2024): bill history(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Unicameral Update: Measure would allow punitive damages in civil cases (LB57, 2024)(update.legislature.ne.gov).gov
- LB57 (108th Legislature, First Special Session, 2024): bill history(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- LB25 (108th Legislature, 2024): Final Reading text(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- LB25 amendment AM3435 (2024)(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1232: Employee; claim; judgment; additional recovery from employer; when(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.