Pennsylvania Traffic Camera Tickets: Five Programs, One 2027 Deadline
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Pennsylvania does not run one traffic camera law. It runs five, each created by its own section of Title 75 with its own fine, its own geography, and, in one important case, its own expiration date. A ticket from Philadelphia's red light cameras is not governed by the same rules as a ticket from a Turnpike work-zone camera or a Roosevelt Boulevard speed camera, even though all five share the same basic civil, no-points structure.
Pennsylvania's Five Camera Programs, Side by Side
| Program | Statute | Where | Fine | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red light (ARLE), Philadelphia | 75 Pa.C.S. 3116 | City of the first class (Philadelphia), via the Philadelphia Parking Authority | $100 | Expires July 15, 2027 |
| Red light (ARLE), other municipalities | 75 Pa.C.S. 3117 | Municipalities meeting a population/police-accreditation formula, including Pittsburgh | $100 | Expires July 15, 2027 |
| Work-zone speed | 75 Pa.C.S. 3369 | Active work zones on federal-aid highways, PennDOT and Turnpike Commission only | Warning, then $75, then $150 | Permanent (2023) |
| Roosevelt Boulevard speed | 75 Pa.C.S. 3370 | US-1 in Philadelphia; expandable to up to five citywide corridors | Up to $150 | Permanent (2023) |
| School-zone speed pilot | 75 Pa.C.S. 3371 | Up to 5 school zones, Philadelphia only | Up to $150 | Expires December 31, 2029 |
| School-bus stop-arm | 75 Pa.C.S. 3345.1 | Any Pennsylvania school entity, statewide | $300 | No sunset |
The red light program (commonly called ARLE, Automated Red Light Enforcement) works differently in Philadelphia than everywhere else. In Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Parking Authority administers the system directly under 3116. Elsewhere, 3117 opens the program to municipalities that meet a formula: cities with a population over 20,000 and PA-Chiefs-accredited police in second-class-A counties, the same threshold in third-class counties of 490,000 to 510,000 residents, and cities of the second class, meaning Pittsburgh. That department review is a 3117 requirement only: the municipality must notify PennDOT of each proposed intersection, the department then has 60 days to review the location and issue a recommendation, and no system may be installed unless that recommendation approves the site. Section 3116 imposes no comparable review on Philadelphia.
Why It's Civil, Not Criminal, Everywhere
All five programs share the same protective language, most cleanly stated in the work-zone statute. 75 Pa.C.S. 3369 provides that the penalty «shall not: (i) be deemed a criminal conviction; (ii) be made part of the operating record...; (iii) be the subject of merit rating for insurance purposes; or (iv) authorize imposition of surcharge points.» The red light, Roosevelt Boulevard, school-zone, and school-bus statutes each carry materially identical protections. A Pennsylvania camera ticket, from any of the five programs, cannot add points to your license, cannot trigger an insurance surcharge, and is not a criminal conviction of any kind.

The July 15, 2027 Deadline That Ends Red Light Cameras
This is the fact most coverage of Pennsylvania's camera laws misses. Both red light statutes, 3116 and 3117, carry an identical sunset clause: «This section shall expire July 15, 2027.» That date was last set by a 2016 extension (Act 101 of 2016), and it applies to every ARLE program in the state, Philadelphia included.
By contrast, when the legislature overhauled the speed camera programs in 2023 (Act 38), it deliberately removed the sunset clauses from the work-zone (3369) and Roosevelt Boulevard (3370) statutes, making both permanent, and it added a brand-new school-zone pilot (3371) that itself sunsets December 31, 2029. Act 38 did not touch the ARLE sunset. Unless the legislature passes another extension before July 15, 2027, Pennsylvania's red light camera programs, including Philadelphia's, lose their legal authorization on that date. No 2025-26 extension had been confirmed as of this writing; readers should check for updated legislation as that date approaches.
Grace Periods and How the Fines Escalate
Each program builds in a warning period before real money changes hands. The two red light statutes do not share a number. Under 3116, Philadelphia waives fines for the first 120 days of operation at the initial intersection and the first 45 days at each additional intersection. Under 3117, every other qualifying municipality waives only the first 60 days at the initial intersection and the first 30 days at each additional one. The Roosevelt Boulevard and school-zone speed programs are simpler still: each provides that a fine is not authorized during the first 30 days of operation of a system, and the administrator may send a written warning during that window instead. The work-zone speed program escalates in three steps: a written warning first, then a $75 fine, then $150 for a subsequent violation.
Because every program is a civil penalty rather than a criminal citation, enforcement of an unpaid fine runs through civil debt collection by the administering authority rather than through the criminal courts. The enacted statutory text does not establish a vehicle-registration or license-renewal hold tied to an unpaid ARLE penalty, so treat that consequence as unconfirmed rather than assuming it exists.
Who's Liable: Owner Defenses
The registered owner is liable by default, but Pennsylvania builds in owner protections. A lessee is treated as the owner under the work-zone statute (3369), and every one of the five programs expressly bars the enforcing body from making an owner name the driver. Sections 3370 and 3371 say «the city of the first class may not require the owner of the motor vehicle to disclose the identity of the driver of the motor vehicle at the time of the violation»; 3116 says the same of the city of the first class for red light tickets, 3117 says it of the municipality, and 3369 provides that the owner «may not be required to disclose the identity of the driver.» An owner may still be required to submit evidence that the owner was not the driver. An owner who was convicted of the same violation under a different section, or who can establish a recognized statutory defense, is not doubly liable.

School Bus Stop-Arm Cameras Are a Separate Program
Pennsylvania's sixth camera law, and the one most likely to be confused with the red light and speed programs on this page, is the statewide school-bus stop-arm camera authority under 3345.1. It lets any Pennsylvania school entity run stop-arm cameras and issue a $300 civil penalty, split between the school entity, local police, and a state School Bus Safety Grant Account. That program is a distinct enforcement track from red light and speed cameras and is out of scope for this page.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Traffic Camera Ticket Laws by State
- Do You Have to Pay a Camera Ticket?
- How to Fight a Camera Ticket
- Automated License Plate Reader Laws
- Hit and Run Laws in the United States
- Pennsylvania Police Bodycam Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Pennsylvania Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Will a Pennsylvania camera ticket put points on my license?
No. All five red light and speed camera programs in Pennsylvania are structured as civil penalties. By statute, none of them can be deemed a criminal conviction, added to your operating record, or used for an insurance surcharge.
Is Philadelphia's red light camera program permanent?
No. Both Philadelphia's program (75 Pa.C.S. 3116) and the statute covering other qualifying municipalities (3117) are set to expire July 15, 2027, unless the legislature extends the deadline again before then.
Are Pennsylvania's speed camera programs also set to expire?
Not the work-zone or Roosevelt Boulevard programs. A 2023 law (Act 38) removed their sunset clauses and made them permanent. The newer Philadelphia school-zone speed pilot does still have a sunset, December 31, 2029.
Do I get a warning before I'm fined by a Pennsylvania traffic camera?
Generally yes, but the length depends on the program. Philadelphia's red light cameras waive fines for the first 120 days at the initial intersection and 45 days at each later one, while red light cameras in other municipalities waive 60 days and 30 days. The Roosevelt Boulevard and school-zone speed programs each waive fines for the first 30 days a system operates. Work-zone speed cameras give a written warning before the first paid fine.
Can I be forced to say who was driving my car in Philadelphia?
No, and that is true of every Pennsylvania camera program, not just the speed pilots. Philadelphia's red light statute (75 Pa.C.S. 3116), the other-municipalities red light statute (3117), the work-zone program (3369), Roosevelt Boulevard (3370) and the school-zone pilot (3371) each bar the enforcing body from requiring the owner to disclose who was driving. You can still be required to submit evidence that you were not the driver.
Where in Pennsylvania are red light cameras allowed?
Philadelphia runs its own program directly. Other municipalities qualify only if they meet a population and police-accreditation formula in the statute, which as written covers larger second-class-A and third-class counties, plus Pittsburgh as a city of the second class.
Updates
Corrected the grace periods, warning windows, PennDOT review requirement and driver-disclosure rule to reflect that Pennsylvania's five camera statutes set different terms: Philadelphia's red light cameras waive 120 and 45 days while other municipalities waive 60 and 30, the speed programs waive a flat 30 days, the 60-day PennDOT review applies only outside Philadelphia, and all five programs bar requiring an owner to name the driver.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Title 75 (Vehicles)
§ 3116Automated red light enforcement systems in first class citiesIn force
(a) General rule.-- (1) A city of the first class, upon passage of an ordinance, is authorized to enforce section 3112(a)(3) (relating to traffic-control signals) by recording violations using an automated red light enforcement system approved by the department. (2) This section shall only be applicable at intersections in the city of the first class agreed upon by the system administrator and the Secretary of Transportation who shall consider using the automated red light enforcement system at the following intersections: (i) U.S. Route 1 (Roosevelt Boulevard) at Grant Avenue, at Red Lion Road and at Cottman Street. (ii) Kensington Avenue at Clearfield Street. (iii) Richmond Street at Allegheny Avenue and at Castor Avenue. (iv) Aramingo Avenue at York Street. (v) Thompson Street at Lehigh Avenue. (vi) Broad Street at Washington Avenue. (b) Owner liability.--For each violation pursuant to this section, the owner of the vehicle shall be liable for the penalty imposed unless the owner is convicted of the same violation under another section of this title or has a defense under subsection (f).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Andrew Dankanich v. Marcel Pratt (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2021)“…t system” operated by the PPA to record traffic violations. 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3116(a), (h).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 3117Automated red light enforcement systems in certain municipalitiesIn force
(a) General rule.--A municipality, upon passage of an ordinance, is authorized to enforce section 3112(a)(3) (relating to traffic-control signals) by recording violations using an automated red light enforcement system approved by the department. (b) Applicability.-- (1) This section shall only be applicable at intersections in a municipality designated by the municipality with the approval of the secretary under the requirements of paragraph (2). (2) No automated red light system shall be installed until the municipality provides notice to the department of the location of each intersection. After receiving notice and before the system may be installed, the department shall have 60 days to review each proposed intersection and to issue a recommendation to the municipality which shall include all of the following: (i) A statement on whether the proposed intersection is an appropriate location for an automated red light enforcement system. (ii) The data on which the department based the recommendation. (3) No system shall be installed if the department does not issue a recommendation approving the location to the municipality.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
§ 3369Automated speed enforcement systems in active work zonesIn force
(a) Establishment.--A program is established to provide for automated speed enforcement systems in active work zones. (b) Applicability.--This section shall apply to Federal aid highways only under the jurisdiction of the department and the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission. An automated speed enforcement system may not be used unless: (1) At least two appropriate warning signs are conspicuously placed before the active work zone notifying the public that an automated speed enforcement system is in use. (2) The first warning sign under paragraph (1) shall: (i) Be the largest size available in conformance with Federal regulations, unless the department or the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission determines that a smaller size is necessary to ensure the safety of the work zone. (ii) Clearly and accurately indicate if the automated speed enforcement system is active and in use.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re: Order Adopting Rule 351 and Amending the Comments to Rules 301, 302, and 321 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2023)“…his chapter apply to: (1) de novo appeals filed pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 3369(j)(4), relating to automated work zone…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 3370Automated speed enforcement system on designated highwaysIn force
(a) General rule.--A program is established to provide for an automated speed enforcement system on U.S. Route 1 (Roosevelt Boulevard) between Ninth Street and the Philadelphia County line shared with Bucks County in a city of the first class. The following shall apply: (1) A city of the first class, upon passage of an ordinance, is authorized to enforce section 3362 (relating to maximum speed limits) on Roosevelt Boulevard by recording violations using an automated speed enforcement system approved by the department. (2) (Deleted by amendment). (3) A city of the first class may expand the automated speed enforcement system beyond Roosevelt Boulevard to no more than five corridors if the following conditions are met: (i) The city of the first class, in consultation with the department, proposes a new State or local highway corridor within the borders of the city of the first class according to speed data and speed-related accidents involving vehicles or pedestrians. Each proposed corridor must include a beginning segment and an end segment on the same State or local route within the borders of the city of the first class.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In re: Appeal of: T. Heinz ~ Appeal of: T. Heinz (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2024)“…e of Violation (Violation Notice) and an 1 75 Pa.C.S. § 3370 (pertaining to automated speed enforcem…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 3371Pilot program for automated speed enforcement systems in designated school zonesIn force
(a) General rule.--A pilot program is established to provide for an automated speed enforcement system in designated school zones in a city of the first class. The following shall apply: (1) This section shall only be applicable in a city of the first class in no more than five school zones agreed upon by the system administrator, on the city's behalf, and the secretary. (2) A city of the first class shall conduct an engineering and traffic investigation under section 6109(e) (relating to specific powers of department and local authorities) on the posted speed limit within the proposed school zone for an automated speed enforcement system. (3) A city of the first class shall provide at least one opportunity for public comment regarding the proposed school zone. (4) When the requirements under paragraphs (2) and (3) are met, a city of the first class, upon passage of an ordinance for the school zones, is authorized to enforce section 3365(b) (relating to special speed limitations) by recording violations using an automated speed enforcement system approved by the department.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
§ 3345.1Automated enforcement of failure to stop for school bus with flashing red lightsIn force
(a) General rule.--A school entity may install and operate a side stop signal arm enforcement system for the purpose of enforcing this section. (a.1) Violation and liability.-- (1) A motor vehicle meeting or overtaking a school bus stopped on a highway or trafficway when the red signal lights on the school bus are flashing and the side stop signal arms are activated as described in section 3345 (relating to meeting or overtaking school bus) is a violation of this section. (2) The owner of a motor vehicle that violates paragraph (1) shall be liable for the penalty imposed under subsection (c), unless the owner is convicted of a violation of section 3345 or has a defense under subsection (f). For the purposes of this section, the lessee of a leased vehicle shall be considered the owner of a motor vehicle. (b) Applicability.-- (1) (Deleted by amendment). (2) Nothing in this section shall supersede the provisions of: (i) Section 3105(h) (relating to drivers of emergency vehicles). (ii) Section 3345(c) or (d).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re: Order Adopting Rule 351 and Amending the Comments to Rules 301, 302, and 321 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2023)“…nforcement violations[,]; and (2) actions filed pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 3345.1(i.1), relating to civil violations for…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- 75 Pa.C.S. 3116, Automated red light enforcement systems in cities of the first class(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 75 Pa.C.S. 3117, Automated red light enforcement systems in other municipalities(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 75 Pa.C.S. 3369, Automated speed enforcement in active work zones (no-consequence clause; made permanent by Act 38 of 2023)(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 75 Pa.C.S. 3370, Automated speed enforcement on Roosevelt Boulevard(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 75 Pa.C.S. 3371, Automated speed enforcement school-zone pilot program (expires December 31, 2029)(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 75 Pa.C.S. 3345.1, School bus automated stop-signal enforcement systems(legis.state.pa.us).gov