Utah
Utah Squatters Rights and Adverse Possession Laws (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Utah sets one of the highest bars for adverse possession in the country: a claimant must occupy the land continuously for seven years and pay every tax levied on the property during that period, under Utah Code sections 78B-2-208 through 78B-2-214 (a shorter four-year track applies to a narrower category of tax-title claims under section 78B-2-209(2)). Property owners have two statutory tools for removal: the traditional unlawful detainer action under Utah Code section 78B-6-801 and the expedited trespasser-removal process added by the 2025 Legislature under section 78B-6-817.
Information last verified on May 27, 2026. This article provides general legal information, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers Utah state law only. For a nationwide overview, see the national squatters rights guide.
Adverse Possession in Utah: Period, Taxes, and Elements
The 7-Year Statutory Period
sets the limitations period for adverse possession at seven years. That period is shorter than many states, but Utah pairs it with a tax-payment requirement that most other states do not impose. A claimant who occupies land for seven years without also paying the property taxes during that entire span cannot succeed under Utah law, no matter how open or notorious the possession was.
The seven-year clock runs from the date the claimant first takes possession. It pauses if the true owner is a minor, is incapacitated, or is serving in the military at the time the adverse use begins. Once the disability lifts, the owner has a limited additional window to bring an action.

Mandatory Tax Payment
The tax-payment element is a substantive requirement under Utah's adverse possession statutes and is not a technicality. Utah courts treat it as a substantive requirement. A claimant must demonstrate payment of all taxes and assessments levied on the property during each of the seven years. Gaps in tax payment defeat the claim even when possession is otherwise uninterrupted.
In practice, this element works strongly in favor of landowners. Most trespassers and squatters never obtain a tax bill for land they do not own, let alone pay one. A property owner who has kept up with taxes can use the county tax records as direct evidence that no adverse possession claim can succeed.
Written Instrument or Actual Occupancy
Utah adverse possession claims generally fall into two types:
Under color of title or a judgment. establishes this pathway: a claimant who holds a written instrument, such as a deed that turns out to be defective, or who occupies pursuant to a court judgment, and has occupied the property continuously for at least seven years is considered to claim under color of title. governs what counts as qualifying possession for this pathway: the property must be usually cultivated or improved, protected by a substantial enclosure, used (even unenclosed) for fuel, fencing timber, husbandry, or pasturage, or treated as occupied under the customary partly-improved-farm rule. The statute treats the boundaries of the written instrument as the boundaries of the adverse claim, subject to the seven-year period and tax payment.
By actual occupancy. Under , a claimant without any written instrument, judgment, or decree must show actual, continued occupation of the land under a claim of title, exclusive of any other right; only the land actually occupied, and no other, counts. The occupancy must be open, notorious, and hostile. Mere presence on unimproved land without any visible act of possession does not start the statutory clock.
The Four-Year Tax-Title Presumption
(2) creates a separate, narrower track: a person who establishes prima facie evidence of ownership under a tax title held by that person and their predecessors for four years before the action is filed is presumed to be the owner by adverse possession. This four-year presumption is shorter than the seven-year tracks described above, but it applies only to claimants who trace their claim to an actual tax title, not to an ordinary trespasser or squatter with no tax-sale document in their chain.
OCAN Elements Required in Every Utah Adverse Possession Case
Regardless of which pathway a claimant follows, Utah courts require proof of five elements, often summarized as OCAN plus hostility:
- Open possession visible to a reasonable owner inspecting the land.
- Continuous possession without significant interruption for the full seven years.
- Actual possession, meaning physical use of the land in a way consistent with its character.
- Notorious possession that puts the owner on constructive notice.
- Hostile possession under a claim of right, meaning the claimant does not have the owner's permission.
If any element is missing for even a portion of the seven-year period, the claim fails.
Tacking
A claimant may add together, or "tack," successive periods of adverse possession from different occupants, provided there is privity between them. Privity generally means the prior occupant voluntarily transferred possession, such as through a sale or inheritance. A squatter who simply moves into a spot vacated by another squatter cannot tack the prior squatter's time.
How to Remove a Squatter in Utah
Step 1: Do Not Use Self-Help
Utah law prohibits self-help eviction. A property owner who physically removes a squatter, changes locks, shuts off utilities, or removes the squatter's belongings without a court order can face civil liability. Even when the occupant entered illegally and has no valid lease, the owner must use the statutory process.
Step 2: Call Law Enforcement and Document the Situation
If a squatter has just entered the property or is clearly trespassing with no claim of any right to be there, contact local law enforcement. Officers can remove a trespasser on the spot if the occupancy is fresh and no dispute about tenancy exists. Obtain a police report. Photograph or video the entry point, the squatter's belongings, and any damage. These records support both a removal action and a future claim for damages.

Step 3: Serve Written Notice
Even for squatters, Utah's unlawful detainer statute requires written notice before a court action can proceed. Under Utah Code section 78B-6-802, the owner must serve a three-day notice to vacate for unlawful detainer based on trespass or holdover. The notice must state the grounds and give the occupant three days to leave. Personal service is preferred, but the statute allows posting and mailing if personal service is not possible.
For the expedited trespasser-removal process under section 78B-6-817, the property owner or an authorized agent instead submits a verified complaint to law enforcement, attesting under penalty of perjury that the occupant entered unlawfully, is not a tenant under a written lease, is not an immediate family member, and that no litigation over the property is pending. There is no fixed statutory notice period; once law enforcement determines the owner appears entitled to relief, officers act without delay to instruct the trespasser to leave or serve a notice to vacate.
Step 4: File the Appropriate Court Action
Unlawful Detainer (§ 78B-6-801 et seq.). This is the standard eviction lawsuit. The owner files a complaint in the district court of the county where the property is located. After filing, the court sets a hearing. If the squatter does not appear or cannot demonstrate any legal right to possession, the court enters judgment for the owner and issues a writ of restitution directing the sheriff to remove the occupant.
Trespasser Removal Through Law Enforcement (§ 78B-6-817). Utah created this separate, faster procedure, effective May 7, 2025, for situations where a person occupies property without any landlord-tenant relationship, family relationship, or other legal right ever existing. The property owner or an authorized agent submits a verified "Complaint to Remove Trespassers Unlawfully Occupying Real Property" to law enforcement, attesting that the occupant entered unlawfully, the property was not open to the public, the owner directed the occupant to leave, and the occupant is not a tenant, an immediate family member, or a party to pending litigation over the property. Once law enforcement confirms the owner appears entitled to relief, officers must act without delay to instruct the trespasser to leave or serve a notice to vacate, restoring possession to the owner without a full unlawful detainer trial. A person who is wrongfully removed under this process may sue for actual damages, triple the fair market rent of the dwelling, court costs, and attorney fees, and courts must expedite those cases.
Step 5: Obtain a Writ of Restitution
Once the court enters judgment or issues an order of restitution, the county sheriff executes the writ and physically removes the occupant if they have not already left. The owner must not attempt removal before the sheriff acts.

Step 6: Recover Possession and Secure the Property
After the sheriff restores possession, change the locks, board or repair any entry points, and post no-trespassing signs. Keep a record of all costs incurred. Utah's unlawful detainer statute allows the court to award damages, attorney fees, and costs against a squatter who held over without any valid defense.
2025 Legislative Update
The Utah Legislature enacted its expedited trespasser-removal statute, , in the 2025 General Session (Chapter 295), effective May 7, 2025. It is the newest tool available to Utah property owners dealing with a non-tenant trespasser and works alongside, not in place of, the long-standing unlawful detainer process. Owners should monitor the Utah Legislature's website for future sessions, as squatter-removal legislation has been an active topic in many western states.
Legal disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about Utah adverse possession and squatter removal laws. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Property law questions are fact-specific. Consult a licensed Utah attorney for advice about your particular situation.
Sources
- through 78B-2-214 (Adverse Possession), Utah State Legislature, le.utah.gov
- Utah Code Ann. §§ 78B-6-801 through 78B-6-816 (Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer), Utah State Legislature, le.utah.gov
- (Limited Alternative Remedy to Remove a Trespasser From Real Property, 2025 General Session, Chapter 295), Utah State Legislature, le.utah.gov
- (Criminal Trespass), Utah State Legislature, le.utah.gov
For laws in other states and an overview of how adverse possession works nationwide, see the national squatters rights guide.
Content on RecordingLaw.com is reviewed by our editorial team and updated when statutes or regulations change. This page was last reviewed on May 27, 2026.
More Utah Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a squatter have to be on property in Utah before claiming adverse possession?
Seven years of continuous, open, notorious, actual, and hostile possession is required under Utah Code section 78B-2-208. The claimant must also pay all property taxes assessed on the land throughout that entire seven-year period. Missing even one year of tax payments defeats the claim.
Does paying property taxes create a legal right to someone else's land in Utah?
No. Paying taxes alone does not create any ownership right. Tax payment is a required element of an adverse possession claim, but it must be combined with seven years of qualifying physical possession. A person who pays taxes without possessing the land acquires nothing.
Can a Utah property owner just call police to remove a squatter?
Sometimes, but not always. If the entry was recent and clearly unauthorized, officers may treat the situation as criminal trespass and remove the person immediately under Utah Code section 76-6-206. If the squatter claims any right to be on the property, or if the entry occurred some time ago, police typically direct the owner to the civil unlawful detainer process rather than acting unilaterally.
What is the difference between unlawful detainer and the trespasser-removal law in Utah?
Unlawful detainer under section 78B-6-801 is a full eviction lawsuit that can apply to tenants, former tenants holding over, and squatters. Utah Code section 78B-6-817, enacted in 2025, is a faster, law-enforcement-based process specifically for situations where the occupant is not a tenant, not an immediate family member, and no litigation over the property is pending. The owner submits a verified complaint to law enforcement instead of filing a lawsuit, and officers act without delay once the owner appears entitled to relief, making it faster than a full unlawful detainer case when the facts are straightforward.
Can a squatter acquire rights through color of title in Utah?
Yes. Under Utah Code section 78B-2-210, a person holding a defective written instrument purporting to convey title, such as a deed with a defect in execution, may claim adverse possession under color of title. The seven-year period and mandatory tax payment still apply, and the claimed area is limited to the boundaries described in the defective instrument.
Does a squatter have any rights in Utah before seven years have passed?
A squatter who has not yet satisfied the seven-year adverse possession period has no ownership claim and no legal right to remain on the property. The owner may remove them through the unlawful detainer process or, if the occupant is not a tenant or family member, the section 78B-6-817 trespasser-removal process, at any time. The squatter's only protection against self-help removal is the rule that the owner must use the court process rather than acting unilaterally.
What notice is required before filing an eviction action against a squatter in Utah?
Under Utah Code section 78B-6-802, a written notice to vacate is required before filing an unlawful detainer action. The trespasser-removal process under section 78B-6-817 does not use that notice; instead the owner submits a verified complaint to law enforcement, and once the owner appears entitled to relief, officers act without delay to instruct the trespasser to leave or serve a notice to vacate.
Updates
Corrected a fabricated legal claim: the article had described Utah Code sections 78B-6-1501 through 78B-6-1504 as a 'wrongful-occupant removal' law, but those sections are actually the Structured Settlement Protection Act and have nothing to do with squatters. The article now correctly describes Utah's real expedited trespasser-removal law, Utah Code section 78B-6-817, enacted in 2025. Also added coverage of a shorter 4-year adverse-possession track for tax-title claims under section 78B-2-209(2), and added missing citations for the color-of-title (section 78B-2-210) and actual-occupancy (section 78B-2-212) adverse possession pathways already discussed in the body.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected Utah Code section attributions in the adverse possession discussion: § 78B-2-211 (cultivation/enclosure requirements) governs written-instrument and judgment claims, not no-instrument actual-occupancy claims; § 78B-2-209 is a possession presumption and 4-year tax-title rule, not the source of the color-of-title/actual-occupancy distinction; and the mandatory tax-payment requirement is no longer miscoded to § 78B-2-208.
Corrected the color-of-title citation in the FAQ to Utah Code 78B-2-210, the section addressing defective written instruments.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 7 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Utah Code, Title 76: Criminal Offenses
§ 76-6-206Criminal trespass.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) (a) As used in this section: (i) "Enter" means intrusion of the entire body or the entire unmanned aircraft. (ii) "Graffiti" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-101. (iii) "Remain unlawfully," as that term relates to an unmanned aircraft, means remaining on or over private property when: (A) the private property or any portion of the private property is not open to the public; and (B) the person operating the unmanned aircraft is not otherwise authorized to fly the unmanned aircraft over the private property or any portion of the private property. (b) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5 and 76-6-201 apply to this section.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at le.utah.gov
Cited in 21 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases: Salt Lake City v. Grotepas (Court of Appeals of Utah 1994, 238 Utah Adv. Rep. 13) · State v. Hamilton (Utah Supreme Court 2003, 473 Utah Adv. Rep. 18) · State v. Kitches (Court of Appeals of Utah 2021, 484 P.3d 415)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Utah Code, Title 78B: Judicial Code
§ 78B-2-208Adverse possession -- Possession presumed in owner.In force
(1) In an action for the recovery of real property, it is presumed that: (a) the person establishing legal title to the property has been in possession of the property; and (b) any occupation of the property has been under and in subordination to the legal title. (2) Subsection (1) may be rebutted by a showing that the property has been held and possessed adversely to the legal title for at least seven years before commencement of the action.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at le.utah.gov
Cited in 2 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2014
Leading cases: Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. Strand (Court of Appeals of Utah 2010, 665 Utah Adv. Rep. 25) · Q-2, LLC v. Hughes (Court of Appeals of Utah 2014, 752 Utah Adv. Rep. 27)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 78B-2-209Adverse possession -- Presumption -- Proviso -- Tax title.In force
(1) In an action for the recovery or possession of real property, to quiet title to or determine the property's owner, the person establishing a legal title to the property is presumed to have been in possession of the property within the time required by law. The occupation of the property by any other person is considered to have been under and in subordination to the legal title, unless it appears that the property has been held and possessed adversely to the legal title for seven years before the commencement of the action. (2) If in any action a party establishes prima facie evidence of ownership of any real property under a tax title held by him and his predecessors for four years prior to the commencement of the action, he is presumed to be the owner of the property by adverse possession. This presumption may be rebutted if it appears that the owner of the legal title or his predecessor has actually occupied or been in possession of the property under the title or that the tax title owner and his predecessors have failed to pay all the taxes levied or assessed upon the property within the four-year period.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at le.utah.gov
§ 78B-2-210Adverse possession -- Under written instrument or judgment.In force
(1) Property is considered to have been adversely held if a person in possession of the property, either personally or through another: (a) (i) possesses a written document purporting to convey title; or (ii) possesses a decree or judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction conveying title; and (b) has occupied the property continuously for at least seven years. (2) If the property consists of a tract divided into lots, the possession of one lot is not considered a possession of any other lot in the same tract.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at le.utah.gov
Cited in 2 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2014
Leading cases: Q-2, LLC v. Hughes (Court of Appeals of Utah 2014, 752 Utah Adv. Rep. 27) · Young v. Robson (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2011, 429 F. App'x 716)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 78B-2-211What constitutes adverse possession under written instrument.In force
For the purpose of constituting an adverse possession by any person claiming a title based upon a written instrument or a judgment or decree, the property is considered to have been possessed if: (1) it has been usually cultivated or improved; (2) it has been protected by a substantial enclosure; (3) although not enclosed, it has been used for the supply of fuel, fencing timber, for the purpose of husbandry, or for pasturage or for the ordinary use of the occupant; or (4) where a known farm or single lot has been partly improved, the portion of the farm or lot which may have been left not cleared or not inclosed according to the usual course and custom of the adjoining county is considered to have been occupied for the same length of time as the part improved and cultivated.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2014
Leading cases: Anderson v. Fautin (Court of Appeals of Utah 2014, 763 Utah Adv. Rep. 5)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 78B-2-212Adverse possession -- Under claim not founded on written instrument or judgment.In force
Where it appears that there has been an actual continued occupation of land under claim of title, exclusive of any other right, but not founded upon a written instrument, judgment or decree, the land actually occupied and no other, is considered to have been held adversely.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2017
Leading cases: Judd v. Bowen (Court of Appeals of Utah 2017, 835 Utah Adv. Rep. 50)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 78B-6-817Limited alternative remedy to remove a trespasser from real property.In force
(1) An owner of real property, or the property owner's authorized agent, may request that law enforcement of the appropriate jurisdiction in which the real property is located, immediately remove a trespasser occupying the real property if the property owner, or an authorized agent of the property owner, attests that: (a) the trespasser has unlawfully entered and remains on the real property; (b) the real property was not open to members of the public at the time the trespasser entered; (c) the property owner has directed the trespasser to leave the real property; (d) the trespasser is not a current or former tenant of the real property under a written rental agreement authorized by the property owner; (e) the trespasser is not an immediate family member of the property owner; and (f) there is no pending litigation related to the real property between the property owner and the trespasser.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at le.utah.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- le.utah.gov
- Utah Code Ann. § 78B-2-209 (Adverse Possession -- Presumption and Tax Title)(le.utah.gov)
- Utah Code Ann. § 78B-2-211 (Adverse Possession -- Written Instrument)(le.utah.gov).gov
- le.utah.gov
- Utah Code Ann. § 78B-6-817 (Limited Alternative Remedy to Remove a Trespasser From Real Property, 2025)(le.utah.gov).gov
- le.utah.gov
- Utah Code Ann. § 78B-2-210 (Adverse Possession -- Under Written Instrument or Judgment)(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code Ann. § 78B-2-212 (Adverse Possession -- Under Claim Not Founded on Written Instrument or Judgment)(le.utah.gov).gov