Sexting LawsOregon Laws flagOregon Laws
Oregon flag

Oregon

Oregon Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties

Independently fact-checkedEditor-reviewedLaw current as of August 20, 2026By Recording Law Editorial TeamReviewed September 1, 202610 min read

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Oregon Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties

Oregon has no dedicated sexting statute. Prosecutors instead apply child pornography, luring, and privacy laws. Possessing or viewing a visual recording of sexually explicit conduct involving a child is encouraging child sexual abuse in the second degree under ORS 163.686, a Class C felony, when the person knows of or consciously disregards the fact that the recording's creation involved child abuse, and encouraging child sexual abuse in the third degree under ORS 163.687, a Class A misdemeanor, when the person only fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk of that fact. The most serious of the three, ORS 163.684, a Class B felony, applies when the person develops, duplicates, publishes, disseminates, exchanges, displays, or sells the material, or possesses, accesses, or views it with intent to do one of those things. All three statutes apply regardless of whether both parties are minors.

Oregon law does not have a statute explicitly titled "sexting." Instead, prosecutors use existing laws regarding child pornography, luring, and privacy violations to charge individuals involved in these activities. The severity of the charge often depends on the age of the participants and whether the images were shared without consent.

The primary statutes relevant to sexting in Oregon include:

  • ORS 163.684: Encouraging child sexual abuse in the first degree (duplication or distribution with intent).
  • ORS 163.686: Encouraging child sexual abuse in the second degree (possession or viewing, knowing of or consciously disregarding that the recording's creation involved child abuse).
  • ORS 163.687: Encouraging child sexual abuse in the third degree (the same possession or viewing, where the person only fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk of that fact).
  • ORS 163.472: Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image (Revenge Porn).
  • ORS 163.670: Using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct.
  • ORS 163.700 & 163.701: Invasion of personal privacy.
  • ORS 167.057: Luring a minor (furnishing a minor a visual representation or explicit description of sexual conduct to induce the minor to engage in sexual conduct). This is a Class C felony.

Teen Sexting and Child Pornography Laws

One of the most critical areas of Oregon law concerns minors involved in sexting. When a minor creates, sends, or possesses a nude image of themselves or another minor, it can technically trigger Oregon's child pornography statutes. Oregon takes a strict approach to the sexual exploitation of children, and "child pornography" is defined broadly.

Federal filing cabinet with organized legal folders

Encouraging Child Sexual Abuse

Oregon splits this offense into three degrees. The first-degree line turns on distribution conduct or intent to distribute; the line between second and third degree is a mental-state distinction about the defendant's awareness that the recording's creation involved child abuse, not a distinction based on intent.

Under ORS 163.686, a person commits "encouraging child sexual abuse in the second degree" if they knowingly possess, control, or access with intent to view a visual recording of sexually explicit conduct involving a child, for the purpose of arousing or satisfying sexual desire, while knowing or consciously disregarding that its creation involved child abuse. Under ORS 163.687, "encouraging child sexual abuse in the third degree" covers exactly the same possessing, controlling, or accessing conduct, but applies where the person "knows or fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk" that the creation of the recording involved child abuse. Third degree is the least serious of the three, so a teenager who merely holds onto a photo sent by a peer is not automatically facing a felony floor.

Under ORS 163.684, the more serious "encouraging child sexual abuse in the first degree" applies when a person knowingly develops, duplicates, publishes, prints, disseminates, exchanges, displays, finances, or sells such a recording, or knowingly possesses, accesses, or views it with the intent to do one of those things.

ORS 163.686: Encouraging Child Sexual Abuse in the Second Degree

A person commits this crime by knowingly possessing, controlling, or accessing with intent to view a visual recording of sexually explicit conduct involving a child, for the purpose of arousing or satisfying sexual desire, while knowing or consciously disregarding that its creation involved child abuse.

ORS 163.684: Encouraging Child Sexual Abuse in the First Degree

"(1)(a)(A) A person commits the crime of encouraging child sexual abuse in the first degree if the person knowingly develops, duplicates, publishes, prints, disseminates, exchanges, displays, finances, attempts to finance or sells a visual recording of sexually explicit conduct involving a child or knowingly possesses, accesses or views such a visual recording with the intent to develop, duplicate, publish, print, disseminate, exchange, display or sell it."

Third-degree encouraging child sexual abuse is a Class A misdemeanor; second-degree is a Class C felony; and first-degree, which requires the added distribution conduct or intent, is a Class B felony. Whether a case is charged as possession or as possession with intent to distribute depends heavily on the facts, including any messages or conduct showing an intent to share the material further, and whether it is charged in the second or third degree depends on what the state can prove about the defendant's awareness that the recording's creation involved child abuse.

Using a Child in a Display of Sexually Explicit Conduct

If a person induces or causes a child to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of creating a visual recording, they may be charged under ORS 163.670. This is a Class A felony, one of the most serious classifications in Oregon law.

ORS 163.670: Using a Child in a Display of Sexually Explicit Conduct

A person commits this crime if they employ, authorize, permit, compel, or induce a child to participate or engage in sexually explicit conduct for any person to observe or record, or if they knowingly record a child participating or engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

In the context of sexting, asking a minor to send a nude photo could potentially be interpreted as "inducing" or "causing" the creation of the material, leading to severe felony charges.

Specific Provisions for Juvenile Offenders

Oregon recognizes that teenagers often engage in impulsive behavior. While the statutes themselves are strict, the juvenile justice system often handles cases involving minors differently than adult court. The goal in juvenile cases is typically rehabilitation rather than pure punishment.

In some instances, if both parties are minors and the age difference is small (often referred to as "Romeo and Juliet" scenarios), authorities may exercise discretion. However, there is no automatic statutory exemption in the primary child pornography laws that explicitly legalizes consensual sexting between minors. The act remains technically illegal, creating significant legal jeopardy for teenagers.

Revenge Porn: Unlawful Dissemination of an Intimate Image

Non-consensual pornography, commonly known as "revenge porn," involves sharing private, sexually explicit images or videos of another person without their consent. Oregon has specific legislation to address this violation of privacy.

ORS 163.472: The Law Against Revenge Porn

Under ORS 163.472, it is a crime to unlawfully disseminate an intimate image. This statute targets individuals who disclose private images with the intent to harass, humiliate, or injure the victim.

ORS 163.472: Unlawful Dissemination of an Intimate Image

A person commits this crime if they:

(a) With the intent to harass, humiliate or injure another person, knowingly cause an identifiable image of that person to be disclosed;

(b) Know or reasonably should know that the other person does not consent to the disclosure;

(c) The other person is in fact harassed, humiliated, or injured by the disclosure; and

(d) A reasonable person would be harassed, humiliated, or injured by the disclosure.

Key Elements of the Crime:

  • Intent: The prosecutor must prove the defendant intended to harass, humiliate, or injure the victim.

  • Lack of Consent: The defendant must know, or reasonably should know, that the person depicted does not consent to the disclosure.

  • Actual and Reasonable-Person Harm: The victim must actually be harassed, humiliated, or injured by the disclosure, and a reasonable person in the same position would be harassed, humiliated, or injured too.

    Penalty: Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is a Class A misdemeanor. This can result in up to 364 days in jail and a fine of up to $6,250.

A second or subsequent conviction under this statute is not merely a harsher misdemeanor sentence. ORS 163.472(2)(b) reclassifies the offense outright as a Class C felony, carrying up to 5 years in prison and a fine of up to $125,000.

Penalties and Sentencing Guidelines

The penalties for sexting-related offenses in Oregon vary widely depending on the specific charge. They range from misdemeanors to serious felonies requiring mandatory prison time and sex offender registration.

Encouraging Child Sexual Abuse (ORS 163.684, ORS 163.686, and ORS 163.687)

Third-degree encouraging child sexual abuse (ORS 163.687), which covers possessing or viewing the material where the person only fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that its creation involved child abuse, is a Class A misdemeanor:

  • Up to 364 days in county jail.
  • Fines up to $6,250.

Second-degree encouraging child sexual abuse (ORS 163.686), which requires that the person knew of or consciously disregarded that the recording's creation involved child abuse, is a Class C felony:

  • Up to 5 years in prison.
  • Fines up to $125,000.
  • Mandatory registration as a sex offender.

First-degree encouraging child sexual abuse (ORS 163.684), which requires intent to develop, publish, disseminate, or sell the material, is a Class B felony:

  • Up to 10 years in prison.
  • Fines up to $250,000.
  • Mandatory registration as a sex offender.

Using a Child in a Display (ORS 163.670)

As a Class A felony, the penalties are even more severe:

  • Up to 20 years in prison.
  • Fines up to $375,000.
  • A Measure 11 mandatory minimum of 70 months (5 years, 10 months) under ORS 137.700, which applies on conviction and does not require any aggravating circumstance. A person serving it is not eligible for post-prison supervision, temporary leave, or any sentence reduction during that term. For a defendant aged 15 to 17, the same 70-month figure applies under ORS 137.707 if the case is waived into adult court.
  • ORS 137.690 names this offense a "major felony sex crime," carrying a 25-year mandatory minimum on a second such conviction.
  • Lifetime sex offender registration.

Unlawful Dissemination (Revenge Porn) (ORS 163.472)

As a Class A misdemeanor:

  • Up to 364 days in county jail.
  • Probation (community supervision).
  • Fines up to $6,250.
  • Civil liability (the victim may sue for damages).

Sex Offender Registration

One of the most long-lasting consequences of a felony conviction related to sexting involving minors is the requirement to register as a sex offender. This status affects where a person can live, work, and travel. For minors adjudicated in juvenile court, registration requirements can vary and may sometimes be avoided or terminated earlier, but for adults convicted of these crimes, the stigma is often permanent.

Invasion of Personal Privacy

Beyond specific sexting laws, Oregon also criminalizes the act of secretly recording or photographing someone in a state of undress without their consent. This is known as "Invasion of Personal Privacy."

ORS 163.700: Invasion of Personal Privacy in the Second Degree

Second degree is the lesser of the two offenses, and it does not cover recording someone in a state of nudity. It reaches two things: being in a location to observe another person in a state of nudity, without consent and for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire, where that person has a reasonable expectation of personal privacy; or knowingly recording another person's "intimate area" without consent where that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy concerning it. ORS 163.700(2)(a) defines "intimate area" as nudity, or undergarments that are being worn and covered by clothing.

ORS 163.700

This is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 364 days in jail. It is the provision that reaches "upskirt" photos of covered undergarments and peeping.

ORS 163.701: Invasion of Personal Privacy in the First Degree

First degree has exactly two paths. The first is knowingly making or recording a photograph, motion picture, videotape, or other visual recording of another person in a state of nudity, without that person's consent, where the person recorded is in a place and circumstances carrying a reasonable expectation of personal privacy. That path is a felony on a first offense, with no prior conviction required. The second path is violating ORS 163.700 while having a prior conviction for invasion of personal privacy in any degree, public indecency, private indecency, or a sex crime as defined in ORS 163A.005.

Sharing or texting the recording afterward is not an element of either path and does not raise the degree. Secretly recording someone nude is first-degree conduct from the moment the recording is made.

ORS 163.701

This is a Class C felony, carrying up to 5 years in prison and a $125,000 fine. ORS 163.701(2)(b) directs the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission to classify it as crime category 6 on the sentencing guidelines grid, and under ORS 163.701(3) the court may designate it a sex crime requiring registration.

When facing charges related to sexting or image-based sexual abuse, several legal defenses may be applicable depending on the facts of the case.

Lack of Intent

For charges like unlawful dissemination (revenge porn), the state must prove the specific intent to harass, humiliate, or injure. If an image was shared accidentally or without malicious intent, this may be a viable defense.

If the defendant can prove that the victim consented to the distribution of the image, the charge of unlawful dissemination would not stand. However, consent to create the image is not consent to distribute it.

Age and Knowledge

In cases involving minors, a defendant might argue they did not know the age of the person in the image. However, strict liability often applies to the age of the victim in sex crimes, meaning "not knowing" is rarely a complete defense for adults interacting with minors. For peer-to-peer sexting, the similarity in age is a significant mitigating factor often handled by prosecutorial discretion or juvenile court diversion programs.

Search and Seizure Violations

Evidence in sexting cases is almost entirely digital. If law enforcement seized a phone or computer without a valid warrant or probable cause, a defense attorney may file a motion to suppress that evidence. If the evidence is suppressed, the case may be dismissed.

Coercion and Extortion (Sextortion)

Sextortion involves threatening to release intimate images unless the victim provides more images, money, or sexual favors. This behavior violates multiple Oregon laws. If it is happening to you or your child now, our sextortion guide explains how to stop responding, report it and have the images taken down.

Coercion (ORS 163.275)

A person commits coercion if they compel or induce another person to engage in conduct the other person has a legal right to abstain from, or to abstain from conduct they have a legal right to engage in, by instilling a fear that the actor will do one of eight things listed in the statute, including engaging in conduct constituting a crime. Threatening to release a nude photo unless the victim sends more images is the pattern this provision reaches. A demand for money or property is charged under the extortion statute below rather than as coercion.

ORS 163.275: Coercion

Coercion is a Class C felony.

Extortion (ORS 164.075)

If the demand is for property, money, or services, the crime is charged as extortion. A 2016 amendment (2016 c.47) dropped "theft by" from the name, so the offense is now captioned simply "Extortion" and is no longer charged as a theft offense; older sources still calling it "theft by extortion" are out of date. ORS 164.075(2) states without qualification that extortion is a Class B felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison. The statute also reaches a demand that the victim refrain from reporting unlawful conduct to law enforcement.

Federal Law: The Take It Down Act

Beyond Oregon's state statutes, the federal Take It Down Act (Public Law 119-12, signed May 19, 2025, codified at 47 U.S.C. 223(h)) criminalizes publishing a nonconsensual intimate image, whether authentic or an AI-generated digital forgery, and requires covered platforms to remove a reported image within 48 hours once that duty became operative in 2026. Threatening to publish an authentic intimate image carries up to 2 years in federal prison for an adult victim or 3 years for a minor victim, the same penalties as actual publication; the shorter 18-month and 30-month threat penalties in the statute apply only to threats involving AI-generated digital forgeries. A separate 2022 federal civil law, 15 U.S.C. 6851, lets victims sue for actual damages or $150,000 in liquidated damages plus attorney fees, though whether it reaches AI-generated forgeries remains legally unsettled.

What to Do If You Are Involved in a Sexting Incident

If you discover that an intimate image of you has been shared without your consent, or if you are accused of sharing such an image, taking immediate and appropriate action is vital.

For Victims

  • Document the Evidence: Take screenshots of the posts, messages, or websites where the image appears. Do not delete the messages sent to you by the perpetrator.
  • Contact Law Enforcement: Report the incident to your local police department. Oregon's revenge porn law (ORS 163.472) empowers police to investigate these crimes.
  • Seek Legal Counsel: A civil attorney can help you pursue a restraining order or sue for damages.
  • Request Removal: Contact the websites or platforms hosting the content to request its removal based on non-consensual distribution policies.

For the Accused

  • Remain Silent: Do not speak to police or investigators without an attorney present. Anything you say can be used against you.
  • Do Not Destroy Evidence: Deleting photos or messages after being accused can lead to additional charges of tampering with evidence (ORS 162.295).
  • Consult a Criminal Defense Attorney: These are serious charges with life-altering consequences. Professional legal representation is essential.

More Oregon Laws

Updates

Corrected the Oregon statute descriptions: encouraging child sexual abuse has three degrees, not two (the Class A misdemeanor third degree under ORS 163.687 was missing), the elements of ORS 163.700 and 163.701 were swapped so that secretly recording someone nude was described as a misdemeanor when it is a first-degree Class C felony on a first offense, sharing a recording is not an element of ORS 163.701, the ORS 163.670 Measure 11 minimum of 70 months applies on conviction rather than only in aggravated cases, and ORS 164.075 is now captioned simply "Extortion."

Corrected Oregon's child sexual abuse material page: simple possession or viewing without intent to distribute is second-degree encouraging child sexual abuse (ORS 163.686, Class C felony), not first-degree (ORS 163.684, Class B felony), which requires intent to further distribute the material. Fixed the misquoted elements and penalty structure of the revenge-porn statute (ORS 163.472), including that a repeat conviction is a felony, not just a harsher misdemeanor sentence. Corrected a misquoted statute for producing child sexual abuse material (ORS 163.670) and added a short passage on the federal Take It Down Act.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. 18 U.S.C. § 2252A: material constituting or containing child pornography(law.cornell.edu).gov
  2. ORS Chapter 163 - Offenses Against Persons (includes 163.472, 163.670, 163.684, 163.686)(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  3. ORS 137.700 and 137.707: Measure 11 mandatory minimum sentences (70 months for ORS 163.670); ORS 137.690 major felony sex crime(oregonlegislature.gov)
  4. ORS 164.075: Extortion (Class B felony, renamed by 2016 c.47)(oregonlegislature.gov)
  5. ORS 167.057: Luring a minor (Class C felony)(oregonlegislature.gov)
Share: