Maine
Maine AI Laws: What's Enacted and What's Next (2027)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 5, 2026). · Law checked current as of November 5, 2026. · 26 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

As of November 2026, Maine has enacted no comprehensive AI law, but it has two AI-specific consumer rules: the chatbot disclosure law at 10 MRSA 1500-DD (LD 1727, PL 2025 c. 294) and the limit on AI therapy at 10 MRSA 1500-EE (LD 2082, PL 2025 c. 687). Maine also has deepfake, child sexual abuse material and election synthetic media amendments.
How we searched: Where this page says we found no law, we mean the Maine Legislature's Bill Tracking and Text Search for the 132nd Legislature (2025 and 2026 sessions), using "artificial intelligence", "chatbot", "algorithm", "algorithmic", "machine learning", "automated decision" and "generative". That search matches words, not exact phrases, so we opened the enacted chapters it returned and searched them for the phrase. We did not sweep earlier legislatures or the whole Maine Revised Statutes.
This page covers Maine state law as of November 4, 2026. It is general legal information, not legal advice. For the national picture, see our guide to US AI laws.
Maine AI Laws at a Glance

| Measure | Subject | Status on November 4, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| LD 1727, PL 2025 c. 294, 10 MRSA 1500-DD | Chatbot disclosure in trade and commerce | In force since September 24, 2025 |
| LD 2082, PL 2025 c. 687, 10 MRSA 1500-EE | AI in therapy and psychotherapy | In force since July 29, 2026 |
| LD 517, PL 2025 c. 593, 21-A MRSA 1014(5-C) | Synthetic media in campaign communications | In force since July 29, 2026 |
| LD 1944, PL 2025 c. 400, 17-A MRSA 511-A | Altered intimate images | In force since September 24, 2025 |
| LD 524, PL 2025 c. 719 | Child sexual abuse material, including AI-generated | Emergency law, enacted April 16, 2026 |
Maine Chatbot Disclosure Law: 10 MRSA 1500-DD (LD 1727)
The rule at 10 MRSA 1500-DD was signed June 12, 2025, and took effect September 24, 2025. It was enacted as section 1500-Y and later reallocated. The operative sentence carries its own limit:
A person may not use an artificial intelligence chatbot or any other computer technology to engage in trade and commerce with a consumer in a manner that may mislead or deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the consumer is engaging with a human being unless the consumer is notified in a clear and conspicuous manner that the consumer is not engaging with a human being.
The trigger is the risk of deception. A chatbot whose use could not mislead a reasonable consumer into thinking it is human does not trip the section by being a chatbot. The rule also reaches "any other computer technology," not only chatbots.
The statute defines an AI chatbot as "a software application, web interface or computer program that simulates human conversation and interaction through textual or aural communications." It reaches trade and commerce with consumers, as those terms are used in the Unfair Trade Practices Act.

Enforcement. A violation is a violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act. Under 5 MRSA 209, the Attorney General may bring an action to restrain a practice, and the court may order money or property restored. Violating an injunction carries a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation, and each intentional violation of section 207 of the act that the Attorney General proves was unfair or deceptive carries a civil penalty of up to $10,000.
Private suits. Under 5 MRSA 213, a person who buys or leases goods, services or property primarily for personal, family or household purposes and suffers a loss of money or property may sue for actual damages, restitution and other equitable relief. A written demand must come at least 30 days before an action for damages.
We found no reported enforcement of the section. The Attorney General's press-release index showed no AI company action when searched for this update, and web searches found no court challenge to a Maine AI statute. Those channels would not show every filing.
LD 2082: Maine's Limit on AI Therapy (10 MRSA 1500-EE)
LD 2082, signed April 13, 2026, took effect July 29, 2026, the general effective date for the session. Its core rule covers anyone offering therapy to the public:
A person may not provide, advertise or otherwise offer therapy or psychotherapy services, including through the use of Internet-based artificial intelligence, to the public unless the therapy or psychotherapy services are provided by a licensed professional.
"Therapy or psychotherapy services" means services to diagnose, treat or address an individual's mental or behavioral health through therapeutic communication, and that term is limited to interaction in a clinical or professional setting. A violation is a violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act. AI-based interventions used solely within a research project approved by an institutional review board, and conducted under federal human-subject protections, are excepted.
What licensees may do. New sections for the licensing boards let a licensee use AI for administrative support or supplementary support, within the scope of practice, while keeping full responsibility for all interactions, outputs and data use.
Conditions. Supplementary support is allowed only when the session is recorded or transcribed, the client is told in writing that AI will be used, its specific purpose, and how session data is stored, retained, used for training and deleted, and the client consents.
What AI may not do. A licensee may not allow AI to make independent therapeutic decisions, directly interact with clients in therapeutic communication, or generate recommendations or treatment plans without the licensee's review and approval.
Other protections. A licensee may not deny treatment solely because a client refuses consent. A client's waiver is void and unenforceable. Violations are subject to board discipline, and each board must adopt rules, which the act classifies as major substantive rules. We did not confirm the status of those rules.

Maine Deepfake and Synthetic Media Laws in Brief
LD 517 added 21-A MRSA 1014(5-C). When a public communication that requires a disclosure contains synthetic media, it must carry the words "THIS COMMUNICATION CONTAINS AUDIO, VIDEO AND/OR IMAGES THAT HAVE BEEN MANIPULATED OR ALTERED." The act allows a civil penalty of up to 500 percent of the expenditure in violation.
Synthetic media here means an image, audio recording or video recording depicting a candidate that is likely to deceive a reasonable person into thinking the candidate said or did something the candidate did not, or that was manipulated or altered in a way likely to give a materially different impression. The definition does not mention AI. It excludes satire, parody, and clarity edits, captions and highlighting that do not change that impression. A broadcast, cable or satellite operator or a newspaper violates the rule only by running a paid communication with actual knowledge that it contains synthetic media.
17-A MRSA 511-A, as amended by LD 1944, reaches an image "created or modified so that it appears to show" a person in a state of nudity or a sexual act, where the person intends to harass, torment or threaten and the statute's other elements are met. It is a Class D crime.
LD 524 defines child sexual abuse material as "any image, including a computer-generated image, that depicts or has been created or modified so that it appears to depict a minor, regardless of whether that depiction is an identifiable child, engaged in sexually explicit conduct." It adds a Class B crime for intentionally or knowingly manufacturing or creating such obscene material, "including using generative AI or machine learning," by a person who knows or has reason to know what it is. Our guide to Maine deepfake laws has the elements and exceptions.
State Government and the Maine AI Task Force
Governor Mills created the Maine Artificial Intelligence Task Force by executive order on December 20, 2024, with 21 members. An executive order is not a statute, and it does not regulate private companies.
PL 2025 c. 650 (LD 2212), a supplemental budget approved April 10, 2026, funds items it describes as following the task force's recommendations. They include state employee AI training, educator grants, a position to coordinate state AI policy, and a public literacy and safety program.
The Legislature also passed study resolves that touch AI, including LD 2052 on technology in classrooms and LD 109 on protecting artists from AI copyright infringement. Those direct studies and do not regulate private AI use.

AI Note-Takers and Recording in Maine
AI meeting assistants raise recording consent questions. Our guide to Maine AI meeting recording laws covers them.
What We Did Not Find in Maine Law
In the search described at the top of this page, through November 4, 2026, we found no Maine act on AI in employment decisions or health insurance decisions, no comprehensive AI or automated decision law, no frontier model law, and no chatbot law aimed at minors.
Maine is not on the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' list of states acting on its model bulletin on insurers' use of AI, in the list's status as of November 3, 2026. That list may lag, and we did not search the Maine Bureau of Insurance's own bulletins.
General laws such as the Maine Human Rights Act are not AI laws, and this page does not cover how a court would apply them to AI.
Maine AI Bills That Did Not Pass
These are not law. Each entry is the final disposition on the Legislature's bill page, read for this update.
| Bill | Subject | Final disposition |
|---|---|---|
| LD 955 | Human oversight in medical insurance payment decisions | Ought Not to Pass, Joint Rule 310, May 20, 2025 |
| LD 1301 | AI in the denial of health insurance claims | Ought Not to Pass, Joint Rule 310, January 27, 2026 |
| LD 2162 | Children's access to AI chatbots with human-like features | Died on adjournment, April 29, 2026 |
| LD 1552 | Landlords setting rents through AI | Ought Not to Pass, Joint Rule 310, June 3, 2025 |
| LD 1597 | Dynamic pricing for certain consumer goods | Ought Not to Pass, Joint Rule 310, May 21, 2025 |
| LD 1690 | AI in campaign advertising | Ought Not to Pass, Joint Rule 310, May 27, 2025 |
| LD 230 | Harmful AI depictions of minors | Leave to Withdraw, May 28, 2025 |
| LD 1822 | Maine Online Data Privacy Act | Died Between Houses, April 13, 2026 |
| LD 307 | Data center council and temporary limit | Vetoed April 24, 2026; veto sustained April 29, 2026 |
How Federal AI Policy Affects Maine
As of November 4, 2026, we found no federal statute in the public laws of the 119th Congress that sets general rules for private AI systems or generally preempts state AI laws. In December 2025, Executive Order 14365 directed federal agencies to challenge or discourage state AI laws the administration views as conflicting with national policy, and called for a federal framework from Congress. The order itself does not declare any state law invalid.
The Justice Department formed an AI Litigation Task Force in January 2026, the White House issued legislative recommendations in March 2026, and the FTC proposed a policy statement in July 2026. Separately, in April 2026 the Justice Department intervened in a lawsuit against Colorado's AI law under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We did not find a published Commerce evaluation of state laws in the Federal Register or on ntia.gov, or a BEAD notice carrying the order's AI condition on NTIA's sites.
For more, see our pages on Trump's AI executive orders and state AI law preemption.
What Changes in Maine AI Law in 2027
As of November 4, 2026, we found no AI law scheduled to take effect in Maine in 2027; we searched the Maine Legislature's Bill Tracking and Text Search for the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
The 132nd Legislature adjourned April 29, 2026, and the bills above are finished. We did not review any bill filed for the next Legislature. The licensing board rules LD 2082 requires are the one open item we know of, and the act as we read it sets no date for them.
More Maine Laws
- Maine Recording Laws
- Maine Surveillance Camera Laws
- Maine Data Privacy Laws
- Maine Sexting Laws
- Maine Background Check Laws
- Maine Whistleblower Laws
- All AI Laws by State
- Maine Deepfake Laws
- Maine AI Meeting Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Maine have an AI law?
Maine has no comprehensive AI law that we found. It has targeted laws: a chatbot disclosure rule at 10 MRSA 1500-DD, a limit on AI therapy under LD 2082, and deepfake, child sexual abuse material and election synthetic media amendments.
Do Maine businesses have to disclose chatbots?
When a chatbot or other computer technology is used in trade and commerce with a consumer in a way that may mislead or deceive a reasonable consumer into believing they are engaging with a human, the consumer must be notified in a clear and conspicuous manner. The law does not require a notice where that risk is absent.
Who enforces Maine's chatbot law?
A violation is a violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act. The Attorney General may seek an injunction, and civil penalties of up to $10,000 for intentional unfair or deceptive violations, under 5 MRSA 209, and a consumer who suffers a loss of money or property in a personal, family or household purchase may sue under 5 MRSA 213.
Is AI therapy legal in Maine?
LD 2082 bars providing, advertising or offering therapy or psychotherapy services to the public, including through Internet-based AI, unless a licensed professional provides them. Licensees may use AI for administrative or supplementary support under conditions, and an IRB-approved research exception applies.
Does Maine require AI disclosures in political ads?
LD 517 requires set words on a public communication that needs a disclosure and contains synthetic media, which the statute defines by what a depiction of a candidate shows, not by whether AI made it. A violation may bring a civil penalty of up to 500 percent of the expenditure in violation.
Does Maine regulate AI in health insurance decisions?
We found no Maine act on it in the 132nd Legislature. LD 955 and LD 1301 received Ought Not to Pass dispositions. Maine is also not on the NAIC list of states acting on its AI model bulletin as of November 3, 2026, though that list may lag.
What AI laws take effect in Maine in 2027?
As of November 4, 2026, we found none in the Maine Legislature's text search for the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
Updates
Rewrote the page: narrowed the chatbot duty to the statute's mislead-or-deceive trigger, corrected the chatbot definition and enforcement including private suits, explained LD 2082 and its July 29, 2026 effective date, and added budget and dated bill dispositions from a legislature text search.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the chatbot law effective date to September 24, 2025, narrowed the Section 511-A offense to dissemination rather than creation, restated the Unfair Trade Practices Act penalty and citation accurately, moved LD 517 to enacted with its Title 21-A, Section 1014 codification, fixed the LD 955 committee dates, and updated the child sexual abuse material section to reflect Public Law 2025, chapter 719.
Updated this page to reflect that LD 517 (AI political-ad disclosure) was signed into law on March 23, 2026, and that the two other pending 2026-session bills discussed, LD 1301 and LD 2162, both failed to pass; also removed a dead citation link.
Corrected the Section 1500-DD/UTPA penalty figure from $1,000 to the statute's actual $10,000-per-violation civil penalty cap (5 M.R.S. 209), and corrected LD 955 from an already-effective law to its actual status (Ought Not to Pass, May 20, 2025, not enacted).
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE, Part 3: REGULATION OF TRADE, Chapter 241: COMMUNICATIONS WITH CONSUMERS VIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
§ 1500-DDRequired disclosure of use of artificial intelligence chatbot to engage in trade and commerceIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
1. Definitions. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise indicates, the following terms have the following meanings. A. "Artificial intelligence chatbot" means a software application, web interface or computer program that simulates human conversation and interaction through textual or aural communications. [PL 2025, c. 294, §1 (NEW); RR 2025, c. 1, Pt. A, §16 (RAL).] B. "Trade" and "commerce" have the same meaning as in Title 5, section 206, subsection 3. [PL 2025, c. 294, §1 (NEW); RR 2025, c. 1, Pt. A, §16 (RAL).] 2. Required disclosure of use of artificial intelligence chatbot to engage in trade and commerce. A person may not use an artificial intelligence chatbot or any other computer technology to engage in trade and commerce with a consumer in a manner that may mislead or deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the consumer is engaging with a human being unless the consumer is notified in a clear and conspicuous manner that the consumer is not engaging with a human being. 3. Violation. A violation of subsection 2 is a violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Also relied on in: Maine Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent, § 710 and § 511, Are Deepfakes Illegal in Maine? 17-A 511-A Laws (2027)
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE, Part 2: SUBSTANTIVE OFFENSES, Chapter 21: OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
§ 511-AUnauthorized dissemination of certain private imagesIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
1. A person is guilty of unauthorized dissemination of certain private images if the person, with the intent to harass, torment or threaten the depicted person or another person, intentionally or knowingly disseminates, displays or publishes an image of another person in a state of nudity or engaged in a sexual act or engaged in sexual contact or an image that has been created or modified so that it appears to show the depicted person in a state of nudity or engaged in a sexual act or engaged in sexual contact in a manner in which there is no public or newsworthy purpose when the person knows or should have known that the depicted person: A. [PL 2015, c. 394, §5 (RP).] B. Is identifiable from the image itself or information displayed in connection with the image; and [PL 2015, c. 339, §1 (NEW).] C. Has not consented to the dissemination, display or publication of the image. [PL 2025, c. 400, §2 (AMD).] 2. This section does not apply to the following: A. Lawful and common practices of medical treatment; [PL 2015, c. 339, §1 (NEW).] B. Images involving voluntary exposure in a public or commercial setting; or [PL 2015, c. 339, §1 (NEW).] C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Also relied on in: Maine Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Defenses (2026), Maine Extortion Laws: Theft by Extortion, Blackmail and Penalties, Maine Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE, Part 2: SUBSTANTIVE OFFENSES, Chapter 12: SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF MINORS
§ 281DefinitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise indicates, the following terms have the following meanings. [PL 2003, c. 711, Pt. B, §12 (NEW).] 1. "Disseminate" means to manufacture, publish, send, promulgate, distribute, exhibit, issue, furnish, sell or transfer or to offer or agree to do any of these acts. 2. "Minor" means a person who has not attained 18 years of age. 3. "Photograph" means to make, capture, generate or save a print, negative, slide, motion picture, computer data file, videotape or other mechanically, electronically or chemically reproduced visual image or material. 4. "Sexually explicit conduct" means any of the following acts: A. A sexual act; [PL 2003, c. 711, Pt. B, §12 (NEW).] B. Bestiality; [PL 2003, c. 711, Pt. B, §12 (NEW).] C. Masturbation; [PL 2003, c. 711, Pt. B, §12 (NEW).] D. Sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation; [PL 2003, c. 711, Pt. B, §12 (NEW).] E. Lewd exhibition of the genitals, anus or pubic area of a person. An exhibition is considered lewd if the exhibition is designed for the purpose of eliciting or attempting to elicit a sexual response in the intended viewer; or [PL 2003, c. 711, Pt.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Nadeau (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2010, 1 A.3d 445)“…e of 18 engaged in sexually explicit conduct, as defined in 17-A M.R.S.A. § 281(4). 2. Computer records or dat…”
- State of Maine v. Andrew J. Legassie (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2017, 171 A.3d 589)“…inor” for purposes of the statute from eighteen, see 17-A M.R.S. § 281(2) (2016); 17-A M.R.S. § 282(1)(A) (201…”
- State v. Parsons (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2005, 874 A.2d 875)“…3, ch. 711, § B1 (effective July 30, 2004), and replaced by 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 281-285 (Supp. 2004). 4…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 21-A: ELECTIONS, Chapter 13: CAMPAIGN REPORTS AND FINANCES
§ 1014Publication or distribution of political public communicationsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
1. Authorized by candidate. Whenever a person makes an expenditure to finance a public communication expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, the public communication, if authorized by a candidate, a candidate's authorized political committee or a candidate's or a candidate's authorized political committee's agents, must clearly and conspicuously state that the public communication has been so authorized and must clearly state the name and address of the person who made or financed the expenditure for the public communication. A public communication financed by a candidate or the candidate's committee is not required to state the address of the candidate or committee that financed the public communication. If a public communication that is financed by someone other than the candidate or the candidate's authorized committee is broadcast by radio, only the city and state of the address of the person who financed the public communication must be stated. 2. Not authorized by candidate.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2012
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- National Organization for Marriage v. McKee (District Court, D. Maine 2010, 723 F. Supp. 2d 245)“…date or an authorized committee or agent of the candidate,” 21-A M.R.S.A. § 1014. Because an independent expenditure rep…”
- Bailey v. Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics (District Court, D. Maine 2012, 900 F. Supp. 2d 75)“…e Eliot Cutler. The Commission found Bailey in violation of 21-A M.R.S.A. § 1014, which requires that election advocacy…”
- Yes for Life Political Action Committee v. Webster (District Court, D. Maine 1999, 74 F. Supp. 2d 37)“…rized” a statement in candidate elections, see 21-A M.R.S.A. § 1014 (West 1993), but not for PACs in issue-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES, Part 1: STATE DEPARTMENTS, Chapter 10: UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES
§ 209Injunction; proceduresIn force
Whenever the Attorney General has reason to believe that a person is using or is about to use any method, act or practice declared by section 207 to be unlawful, and that proceedings would be in the public interest, the Attorney General may bring an action in the name of the State against the person to restrain by temporary or permanent injunction the use of the method, act or practice and the court may make such other orders or judgments as may be necessary to restore to any person who has suffered any ascertainable loss by reason of the use or employment of the unlawful method, act or practice, any moneys or property, real or personal, that may have been acquired by means of the method, act or practice. At least 10 days prior to commencement of an action under this section, the Attorney General shall notify the person of the intended action, and give the person an opportunity to confer with the Attorney General in person or by counsel or other representative as to the proposed action. Notice must be given to the person by mail, postage prepaid, sent to the person's usual place of business, or if the person has no usual place of business, to the person's last known address.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Weinschenk (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2005, 868 A.2d 200)“…an action against Weinschenk and RWB pursuant to the UTPA, 5 M.R.S.A. § 209. RWB and Weinschenk filed a counterclai…”
- State v. Bob Chambers Ford, Inc. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1987, 522 A.2d 362)“…can be ordered for Chambers’ injured customers pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 209. Chambers argues that the *365…”
- State v. Price-Rite Fuel, Inc. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2011, 24 A.3d 81)“…ral failed to comply with the ten-day notice requirement of 5 M.R.S. § 209 prior to filing its complaint. Curro al…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- Maine LD 1727, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 2082, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 517, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 1944, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 524, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 10 MRSA 1500-DD: required disclosure of use of AI chatbot(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 5 MRSA 209: Attorney General actions, Unfair Trade Practices Act(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 5 MRSA 213: private remedies, Unfair Trade Practices Act(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- PL 2025 c. 687 (LD 2082)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 21-A MRSA 1014: publication or distribution of political communications(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- PL 2025 c. 593 (LD 517)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 17-A MRSA 511-A: unauthorized dissemination of certain private images(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- PL 2025 c. 719 (LD 524)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- An Order Establishing the Maine Artificial Intelligence Task Force(www.maine.gov).gov
- PL 2025 c. 650 (LD 2212)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 2052, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 109, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- NAIC, Implementation of the Model Bulletin on Use of AI Systems by Insurers, status as of November 3, 2026(content.naic.org)
- Maine LD 955, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 1301, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 2162, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 1552, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 1597, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 1690, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 230, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 1822, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Maine LD 307, bill page(legislature.maine.gov).gov