Texas Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Privacy, and Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Texas is a one-party consent state under Tex. Penal Code 16.02, so any party to a conversation may record it without notifying the other. Tenants may record discussions with landlords, and landlords may record conversations they join. A landlord who records inside a tenant's unit risks civil liability, and recording a tenant undressed or in a bedroom or bathroom can be a felony.
Overview of Texas Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws
The intersection of recording law and landlord-tenant relationships in Texas involves multiple statutes. Tex. Penal Code Section 16.02 governs audio recording consent, Tex. Penal Code Section 21.15 prohibits invasive visual recording, and Tex. Property Code Chapter 92 establishes landlord and tenant rights regarding security, repairs, and property conditions.
For the broader context of recording law in the state, see the main Texas recording laws page. The Texas Attorney General's office provides guidance on tenant rights, and the Texas State Law Library maintains resources on landlord-tenant law topics.
Tenant Rights: Recording Landlord Interactions

One-Party Consent for Tenant Recordings
Under the one-party consent rule in Tex. Penal Code Section 16.02, Texas tenants can record any conversation they participate in with their landlord, property manager, maintenance staff, or any other representative of the landlord. No notification is required.
Common situations where tenants record landlord interactions include:
- Repair requests: Documenting verbal promises to fix maintenance issues
- Lease negotiations: Preserving discussions about rent increases, lease terms, or renewal conditions
- Move-in and move-out inspections: Recording the condition of the property and any verbal acknowledgments
- Security deposit disputes: Capturing discussions about deductions and damage assessments
- Harassment documentation: Recording threatening, discriminatory, or retaliatory behavior
- Illegal entry complaints: Documenting instances of unauthorized landlord access
Using Recordings as Evidence
Tenant recordings are generally admissible in Texas courts when made lawfully under the one-party consent rule. These recordings can support claims in:
- Justice court eviction proceedings
- Small claims cases for security deposit recovery
- Fair housing discrimination complaints
- Breach of lease contract claims
- Personal injury cases related to unsafe property conditions
- Retaliation claims under the Texas Property Code
Authentication under Texas Rules of Evidence Rule 901 requires evidence that the recording is what it claims to be, usually testimony from the tenant who made it that it is accurate and unaltered. Digital recordings with metadata (timestamps, file creation data) strengthen authentication.
Landlord Rights: Surveillance on Rental Properties

Where Landlords Can Install Cameras
Landlords in Texas can install security cameras on rental properties in areas where tenants and visitors do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Permissible locations include:

- Building exteriors and entrances
- Parking lots and garages (common areas)
- Hallways and stairwells in multi-unit buildings
- Lobbies and common recreation areas
- Laundry rooms and mail areas
- Exterior walkways and courtyards
- Property perimeters and fencing
These cameras serve legitimate purposes including crime deterrence, liability protection, lease compliance monitoring in common areas, and property damage prevention.
Where Landlord Cameras Create Legal Risk
No Texas statute lists banned camera locations, but a landlord who records in places where tenants have a reasonable expectation of privacy takes on serious legal risk. High-risk locations include:
- Inside individual rental units (apartments, houses, condos)
- Bathrooms and restrooms in any location
- Bedrooms and sleeping areas
- Fenced backyards that serve a single unit
- Private patios and balconies enclosed from public view
- Changing areas in pools or fitness centers
Section 21.15 does not criminalize installing a camera as such. Recording or transmitting an image of a tenant's intimate area that the tenant reasonably expects not to be in public view, or of a tenant in a place where a reasonable person would believe they could undress in private (the statute, as amended by H.B. 1465 effective September 1, 2025, names bathrooms, bedrooms, and changing rooms), without consent and with intent to invade privacy violates Tex. Penal Code Section 21.15 (invasive visual recording), a state jail felony punishable by 180 days to 2 years in prison and fines up to $10,000. For an invasive visual recording offense committed on or after September 1, 2025, a conviction requires sex offender registration, which generally ends 10 years after the person is released or completes supervision.
Audio Recording by Landlord Surveillance Systems
When landlord surveillance cameras include audio recording, the one-party consent requirement applies. A camera system that passively records audio of tenant conversations in common areas, without any consenting party participating, may violate Tex. Penal Code Section 16.02.
Landlords who install audio-capable cameras should:
- Post clear signage disclosing that audio recording is in progress
- Limit audio recording to areas where the landlord or staff regularly interact with tenants
- Disable audio in areas where tenants converse privately
- Include surveillance disclosure in lease agreements
Tenant Privacy Rights

The Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
Texas courts recognize that tenants have a reasonable expectation of privacy inside their rental units. This expectation extends to all areas within the leased premises, including bedrooms, bathrooms, and private living spaces. The landlord's ownership of the property does not override the tenant's privacy rights within the leased unit.
Landlord Entry and Recording
Texas does not have a comprehensive statute requiring advance notice before landlord entry, unlike many other states; entry rights are instead controlled by the lease and general common-law and trespass principles. Separately, Tex. Property Code Section 92.0081 prohibits a landlord from barring a tenant's own entry into the unit, such as through an unlawful lockout or an improper lock change, except by judicial process, bona fide repairs or construction, or an emergency.
A landlord who enters a tenant's unit and records the interior without permission may face liability for:
- Invasion of privacy (civil tort)
- Invasive visual recording (criminal under Section 21.15 if it captures a tenant's intimate areas that the tenant reasonably expects not to be in public view, or a tenant in a place such as a bedroom or bathroom where a person could reasonably expect to undress in private, and the recording was made without consent and with intent to invade privacy)
- Violation of the lease agreement
- Harassment or retaliation claims
Tenant Camera Installation
Tenants have the right to install security cameras inside their own rental units for personal security purposes. This includes doorbell cameras, interior cameras for pet monitoring, and nanny cameras. Tenants should:
- Review the lease for any restrictions on camera installation
- Avoid mounting cameras in a way that damages the property
- Ensure cameras do not capture areas outside the leased premises where others have privacy expectations
- Remove cameras and repair any mounting damage upon move-out
Security Devices Under Texas Property Code
Landlord Obligations for Security Devices
Tex. Property Code Chapter 92, Subchapter D requires landlords to provide specific security devices on rental properties, including:
- Window latches on all exterior windows
- Sliding door pin locks or security bars
- Deadbolts on exterior doors
- Door viewers (peepholes) on exterior doors
- Keyless bolts on exterior doors
These requirements exist independently of any camera surveillance and represent minimum security standards. A landlord who fails to install required security devices faces liability under the Property Code.
Tenant Requests for Additional Security
Under Section 92.164, a tenant can request that a landlord install or repair security devices at the landlord's expense if the devices are required by the statute. If the landlord does not install or rekey a required device, the tenant may:
- Install or rekey the device and deduct the reasonable cost from the next rent payment
- Sue for a court order, actual damages, court costs, and attorney fees, without first serving a request
- Serve a written request and, if the landlord does not comply by the third day after receiving it (the seventh day if the lease contains the required underlined or bold notice), terminate the lease or sue for actual damages, a civil penalty of one month's rent plus $500, court costs, and attorney fees
Landlord Retaliation Protections
Protected Tenant Activities
Tex. Property Code Section 92.331 prohibits landlord retaliation against tenants who engage in legally protected activities. A landlord cannot take adverse action against a tenant for:
- Requesting repairs in good faith
- Filing complaints with government agencies about building code violations
- Participating in tenant organizations
- Exercising legal rights under the lease or the Property Code
Retaliation and Recording
Tenants who record their interactions with landlords while exercising these protected rights create valuable evidence of retaliation. If a landlord retaliates after a tenant reports problems, a recording of the landlord's retaliatory statements or actions can support a claim under Section 92.331.
The anti-retaliation protection lasts for six months from the date of the tenant's protected action. During this period, Section 92.331 bars the landlord from retaliating by filing an eviction, raising rent, cutting services, or ending the lease, except for the reasons the law allows.
Short-Term Rental Recording Issues
Airbnb and Vacation Rental Cameras
Short-term rental hosts in Texas face unique recording law considerations. Platform rules are separate from Texas law and can be stricter. Airbnb's policy prohibits hidden cameras and any security camera or recording device that monitors a home's interior, even if it is turned off, and requires hosts to disclose exterior cameras in the listing.
No Texas statute lists banned camera locations for short-term rentals. The legal risk follows the same rule as for long-term rentals: a host who records an image of a guest's intimate areas that the guest reasonably expects not to be in public view, or of a guest in a bedroom, bathroom, or other place where a person could reasonably expect to undress in private, without consent and with intent to invade privacy, commits a state jail felony under Section 21.15.
Cameras covering exterior areas, entrances, parking areas, and driveways carry the least legal risk. Cameras in bedrooms, bathrooms, and shower areas carry the most.
Disclosure Requirements for Short-Term Rentals
Texas state law does not have a specific disclosure statute for short-term rental surveillance. Disclosure duties come from platform policies, and disclosing cameras also lowers the risk of a privacy claim. Depending on the platform, hosts may need to:
- Disclose the presence and location of all cameras in the listing description
- Identify whether cameras are active or disabled during guest stays
- Remove indoor cameras entirely where the platform bans them (Airbnb does, even if the device is turned off)
- Inform guests of audio recording capabilities
Hidden cameras in a short-term rental can result in criminal prosecution under Section 21.15 where they record guests' intimate areas that guests reasonably expect not to be in public view, or record guests in a bedroom, bathroom, or similar place where a person could reasonably expect to undress in private, without consent and with intent to invade privacy, as well as civil liability for invasion of privacy and removal from rental platforms.
More Texas Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
← Back to Texas Recording Laws
More Texas Recording Topics
More Texas Laws
- Texas AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Texas Dashcam Laws
- Texas Data Privacy Laws
- Texas Deepfake Laws
- Texas Employee Monitoring Laws
- Texas GPS Tracking Laws
- Texas Police Bodycam Laws
- Texas Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a tenant record conversations with their landlord in Texas?
Yes. Texas is a one-party consent state under Penal Code Section 16.02. A tenant who participates in a conversation with their landlord can record it without notifying the landlord. This applies to in-person discussions, phone calls, and electronic communications about repairs, lease terms, or disputes.
Can a landlord put cameras inside a rental unit in Texas?
Not without serious legal risk. No Texas statute flatly bans every landlord camera, but a landlord who records inside a tenant's home without permission can face an invasion-of-privacy lawsuit and trespass or lease claims. Recording a tenant in a bedroom, bathroom, or other place where a person could reasonably expect to undress in private, without consent and with intent to invade privacy, violates Tex. Penal Code Section 21.15, a state jail felony.
Can a landlord install security cameras in common areas of an apartment building?
Yes. Landlords can install cameras in hallways, lobbies, parking lots, laundry rooms, and other common areas where tenants do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. If the cameras record audio, the one-party consent requirement under Section 16.02 applies.
Can a tenant install a doorbell camera on a rental property in Texas?
Generally yes. Tenants can install doorbell cameras and other security devices for personal safety. The tenant should review the lease for restrictions on modifications, avoid causing damage to the property, and remove the camera upon move-out. Tex. Property Code Section 202.023 limits most homeowners' associations (not condominium associations) from banning owners' security cameras, but it does not override a lease, so a tenant should check the lease and get the landlord's permission.
Can an Airbnb host have hidden cameras in Texas?
Not in private spaces. No Texas statute lists banned camera locations, but recording guests in private spaces like bedrooms and bathrooms without consent and with intent to invade privacy violates Tex. Penal Code Section 21.15, a state jail felony. Disclosure rules come from platform policy, not Texas statute: Airbnb prohibits hidden cameras and any camera that monitors the interior of a home, and requires hosts to disclose exterior cameras. A host who records guests unlawfully can face criminal prosecution and civil liability, and breaking platform rules can lead to removal from the platform.
Updates
Removed a changelog entry's claim that a TAKE IT DOWN Act note was added (it is not on this page) and retitled a section heading so it no longer implies every listed camera location carries criminal exposure.
Added the public-view condition to descriptions of the intimate-area part of Texas's invasive visual recording law and retitled a heading that implied a camera-location ban.
Corrected the sex-offender registration period for invasive visual recording, the tenant remedies and deadlines for missing security devices, the six-month retaliation rule, the limits of the HOA camera statute, and the description of where landlord cameras are illegal. Corrected the short-term rental section and FAQ to say that no Texas statute bans camera locations or requires disclosure, that recording guests in private places without consent and with intent to invade privacy is a felony under Penal Code 21.15, and that Airbnb's own policy bans all indoor cameras.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Clarified that Texas Penal Code Section 21.15 criminalizes recording a person's intimate areas or recording a person in a bathroom, bedroom, or other place where they could reasonably expect to undress in private, as amended by H.B. 1465 effective September 1, 2025, rather than the installation of a camera as such.
Corrected an overstated claim that a first Penal Code Section 21.15 conviction requires lifetime sex-offender registration (it is a 10-year period, lifetime only on a second reportable conviction), and fixed a mismatched citation that attributed a landlord-entry-consent rule to Property Code Section 92.0081, which actually governs unlawful lockouts rather than entry notice.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Added the required intent-to-invade-privacy element to three statements about landlord cameras violating Tex. Penal Code Section 21.15, which is not a strict-liability statute.
Corrected two more restatements of the Section 21.15 overstatement (the 'Landlord Entry and Recording' liability bullet and the Airbnb hidden-camera FAQ answer) to include the statute's required lack-of-consent and intent-to-invade-privacy elements.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Added note on H.B. 1465 § 21.15 expanded location definition (eff. Sept. 1, 2025). Core recording rules under § 16.02 and relevant primary law unchanged.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Texas Penal Code
§ 16.02UNLAWFUL INTERCEPTION, USE, OR DISCLOSURE OF WIRE, ORAL, OR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONSIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) In this section: (1) "Communication common carrier," "computer trespasser," "contents," "covert entry," "electronic communication," "intercept," "interception device," "investigative or law enforcement officer," "oral communication," "protected computer," and "wire communication" have the meanings assigned by Article 18A.001, Code of Criminal Procedure. (2) "Immediate life-threatening situation" and "member of a law enforcement unit specially trained to respond to and deal with life-threatening situations" have the meanings assigned by Article 18A.201, Code of Criminal Procedure.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 39 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Texas courts have applied Section 16.02 to contested recordings. Long v. State (2017) held the oral communication definition carries a reasonable expectation of privacy test, sustaining a conviction over a covert locker room recording. Banargent v. State (2007) held a jail inmate impliedly consented, so no Section 16.02 violation.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Banargent v. State (Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) 2007, 228 S.W.3d 393)✓Jail phone prompts and posted notices warned that calls could be recorded, and a recorded call captured the defendant admitting he stabbed the victim; the court held he impliedly consented, so the recording did not violate Section 16.02.
- Long v. State (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas 2017, 535 S.W.3d 511)✓A school board member had her daughter hide a phone in a visiting locker room to record the coach's halftime speech and sent it to the board; the court held Section 16.02's 'oral communication' incorporates the expectation of privacy test, which the coach met.
- Siddiq v. State (Court of Appeals of Texas 2016, 502 S.W.3d 387)✓Police automatically recorded a DWI arrestee's call to his father from the jail book-in desk, capturing him saying he was drunk; the court applied the law enforcement exception to hold the recording did not violate Section 16.02, so admitting it was not error.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Texas Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026), One-Party Consent States: Complete 2026 Guide, Texas Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 21.15INVASIVE VISUAL RECORDINGIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) In this section: (1) "Female breast" means any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola. (2) "Intimate area" means the naked or clothed genitals, pubic area, anus, buttocks, or female breast of a person. (3) "Changing room" means a room or portioned area provided for or primarily used for the changing of clothing and includes dressing rooms, locker rooms, and swimwear changing areas. (3-a) "Place in which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy" means a place in which a reasonable person would believe that the person could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that the act of undressing would be photographed or visually recorded by another or that a visual image of the person undressing would be broadcasted or transmitted by another. The term includes a bathroom, bedroom, and changing room. (4) "Promote" has the meaning assigned by Section 43.21.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 44 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):The Court of Criminal Appeals struck down the 2007 improper photography provision at Penal Code 21.15(b)(1), and Ex parte Shay (2016) set aside a conviction under it. The Legislature re-enacted the section in 2015, and Ex Parte Kamilah a Hamilton (2020) held the current subsection (b)(1) survives strict scrutiny and is not overbroad.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ex Parte Nyabwa (Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) 2011, 366 S.W.3d 719)✓Charged with improper photography, Nyabwa attacked section 21.15(b)(1) by pretrial habeas; the court of appeals held the 2007 subsection regulated the photographer's intent rather than speech and was neither overbroad nor vague. Ex parte Thompson struck it down in 2014.
- Ex parte Shay (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas 2016, 507 S.W.3d 731)✓Shay pleaded guilty under section 21.15(b)(1) before Ex parte Thompson struck that subsection down; the Court of Criminal Appeals held his favorable plea bargain did not estop habeas relief, set aside the conviction, and remanded to dismiss the indictment.
- Ex Parte Kamilah a Hamilton (Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) 2020)✓Indicted under the 2015 version of section 21.15(b)(1) for broadcasting an image of a complainant's intimate area, Hamilton claimed facial overbreadth; the court held the rewritten subsection survives strict scrutiny, is not overbroad, and affirmed denial of relief.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026), Texas Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Exceptions, Texas School Recording Laws: Classrooms, Cameras, and Student Privacy
Sources and References
- Tex. Property Code Chapter 92 - Residential Tenancies(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Penal Code Section 16.02(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Penal Code Section 21.15(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Texas AG - Renter's Rights(texasattorneygeneral.gov).gov
- Texas State Law Library - Repairs(guides.sll.texas.gov).gov
- Texas State Law Library - Retaliation(guides.sll.texas.gov).gov
- Texas H.B. 1465 (89th Leg., R.S.), enrolled text amending Penal Code Section 21.15(capitol.texas.gov).gov