Power of Attorney in Alberta: Enduring Power of Attorney and Personal Directives

Alberta splits incapacity planning into two documents with two different titles for the decision-maker: an enduring power of attorney names an "attorney" to handle property and finances, while a personal directive names an "agent" to handle personal and health care decisions.

Information last verified on 2026-08-15. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Two documents, two decision-maker titles

For the concepts that work the same way in every province, see our national power of attorney guide. Alberta, like British Columbia, treats financial planning and personal/health care planning as separate legal problems governed by separate Acts. But the province uses its own terminology for both the documents and the people who act under them:

• The enduring power of attorney (EPOA), made under the Powers of Attorney Act, RSA 2000, c P-20, covers property and financial matters. The person named to act is called the attorney.
• The personal directive, made under the Personal Directives Act, RSA 2000, c P-6, covers health care and personal decision-making. The person named to act is called the agent, not an attorney.
• The Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee (OPGT), under the Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship Act, is Alberta's oversight body, playing a role broadly similar to the Public Guardian and Trustee of BC.

Alberta.ca's own guidance tells every adult Albertan to have three documents: a personal directive, an enduring power of attorney, and a will. If you are used to another province's terms, note what Alberta does not use: it does not call the personal-care document a "representation agreement" (that is British Columbia's term) or a "power of attorney for personal care" (Ontario's term), and it does not call the financial document a "continuing power of attorney" (also Ontario's term).

The enduring power of attorney: property and finances

An EPOA is void if, at the time it is signed, the donor is mentally incapable of understanding its nature and effect. This is a single, general capacity test, less itemized than British Columbia's six-factor breakdown for its EPOA.

The EPOA must be in writing, dated, and signed by the donor in the presence of one witness, not two. If the donor is physically unable to sign, another person may sign on the donor's direction, in the presence of both the donor and the witness, and the witness must sign in the donor's presence. The document must also state either that it continues despite the donor's later mental incapacity, or that it takes effect only on the donor's mental incapacity: Alberta builds the immediate-versus-springing choice directly into what makes a power of attorney "enduring," rather than leaving it purely to drafting convention.

Alberta's barred-signer and barred-witness rules are narrower than British Columbia's. A person cannot sign on the donor's behalf if they are the named attorney or the attorney's spouse or adult interdependent partner (Alberta's statutory term for a common-law-type partner, broader than "spouse"). The same categories, plus the donor's own spouse or adult interdependent partner and the spouse or adult interdependent partner of anyone signing on the donor's behalf, are barred from witnessing. Unlike BC, Alberta's list does not bar the attorney's child or parent, and does not bar an employee or agent of the attorney. This is a genuine, sourced difference between the two provinces, not an omission.

Remote or electronic witnessing of an EPOA is permitted only when a practising lawyer is providing legal advice on the document's making, signing, or witnessing, under a dedicated regulation governing the mechanics. There is no mandatory statutory form for an EPOA; Alberta's government guidance describes drafting one, often with a lawyer, rather than requiring a published form.

The personal directive: health and personal decisions

Any person at least 18 years old who understands the nature and effect of a personal directive may make one, and adults 18 and older are presumed to understand it. This is a single, non-itemized capacity standard, unlike British Columbia's split between a lower threshold for a standard representation agreement and a higher threshold for a broader one; Alberta has one instrument and one capacity test for it.

A personal directive must be in writing, dated, and signed at the end by the maker in the presence of one witness (or signed on the maker's behalf under the same two-person presence rule that applies to an EPOA), with the witness signing in the maker's presence. The barred-signer and barred-witness categories mirror the EPOA's: the named agent; the agent's spouse or adult interdependent partner; the maker's own spouse or adult interdependent partner; a person signing on the maker's behalf; and that person's spouse or adult interdependent partner. Alberta's minister may establish a form by regulation, but using it is not mandatory.

A personal directive can designate one or more agents, name a person or persons to determine when the maker has become incapable, name who is and is not to be notified, give instructions about access to confidential information, and, if the maker is a minor's guardian, designate a temporary care-and-education agent for that minor.

Even with full authority granted, an agent has no authority over psychosurgery, non-medically-necessary sterilization, removal of living tissue for transplant or research, or participation in research or experimentation offering little or no benefit to the maker, unless the directive contains clear instructions specifically authorizing it. This ceiling applies regardless of how broadly the rest of the directive is drafted.

When an EPOA or personal directive takes effect

An EPOA may provide that it comes into effect at a specified future time or on a specified contingency, including the donor's incapacity, and may name one or more people, who can include the attorney, whose written declaration conclusively establishes that the contingency has occurred. If no one is named for that role, or the named person dies or becomes unable or incapable of making the determination, incapacity is conclusively deemed to have occurred once two medical practitioners declare in writing that it has. Health information about the donor may be disclosed, despite any ordinary confidentiality restriction, to the extent necessary to confirm whether the contingency has occurred.

A personal directive works differently. Under the Act, a directive, or a specific part of it, takes effect only once the maker actually lacks capacity with respect to that particular matter, confirmed either by the person or people the maker designated, after they consult a physician or psychologist, or, if no one is designated or able to act, by two service providers, at least one of whom must be a physician or psychologist. This means a personal directive is inherently springing-only by design: unlike an EPOA, it cannot be drafted to let the agent act immediately while the maker is still capable.

Alberta's Act also sets out an unusually detailed regained-capacity procedure. An agent or service provider must reassess the maker's capacity on observing a significant change, and any disagreement about whether capacity has returned is resolved by two service providers. Neither BC's Act nor the personal-care instruments in the other provinces reviewed for this cluster spell out a comparably explicit process for lifting a directive's suspension once capacity returns.

Duties and limits, and what Alberta's Act leaves open

Subject to the Act and the EPOA's own terms, an attorney may do anything on the donor's behalf that the donor could lawfully do through an attorney, and may also exercise authority for the maintenance, education, benefit, and advancement of the donor's spouse, adult interdependent partner, and dependent children, including the attorney personally, if the attorney is the donor's spouse, adult interdependent partner, or dependent child. This is a materially looser default than British Columbia's, where an attorney needs the EPOA's express permission before receiving any gift or benefit; in Alberta, an attorney who is within these family categories can benefit from acting for the family's maintenance and advancement without needing express gift language in the document. Specific Trustee Act provisions on investment powers apply when an attorney is investing on the donor's behalf, so Alberta cross-references the Trustee Act rather than restating investment standards. Once an attorney has acted, or has accepted the appointment, and the EPOA has not terminated, the attorney has a positive duty to act to protect the donor's interests during any period the attorney knows, or reasonably should know, that the donor cannot make reasonable financial judgments, unless the EPOA states otherwise.

Several rules that British Columbia spells out explicitly are not addressed the same way in Alberta's Powers of Attorney Act, and this article does not guess at what is not written:

• Compensation. The Act contains no express section setting a default on whether, or how much, an EPOA attorney may be paid. By contrast, the Personal Directives Act is explicit for agents: an agent is not entitled to any remuneration for exercising authority under a personal directive unless the directive itself provides for it. No parallel statutory default for EPOA attorney compensation was found; confirm this point directly with a lawyer rather than assuming BC's compensation rule carries over.
• Gifts and loans. Unlike British Columbia's detailed gift-and-loan framework with a prescribed annual ceiling, Alberta's Powers of Attorney Act has no equivalent gifting section. The family-maintenance authority described above is the closest analog, but this article does not state an Alberta gift cap, because none was found in the Act.
• Delegation. No provision comparable to BC's investment-delegation carve-out was found in Alberta's Act.
• Making a will. Neither Act expressly bars an attorney or agent from making a will for the donor or maker, the way British Columbia's Act does. Under Alberta's general law, only the individual can make their own will under the Wills and Succession Act, so the practical outcome is the same, but there is no Powers of Attorney Act or Personal Directives Act clause specific to this point.

For a personal directive, the agent must consult with the maker before making a personal decision, even though the maker lacks capacity under the Act's own trigger. Absent clear instructions in the directive, the agent must decide as the agent believes the maker would have decided, and, failing that, in the maker's best interests. Agents and service providers acting in good faith under the Act are protected from liability, and an agent's good-faith decisions do not disentitle the agent, or the agent's spouse or adult interdependent partner, from a bequest under the maker's will, life insurance proceeds, or an estate share under the Wills and Succession Act.

When an EPOA ends

Except for an irrevocable power of attorney, an EPOA terminates when: the donor, while mentally capable of understanding the revocation's nature and effect, revokes it in writing, subject to a court termination-order process; the attorney renounces and gives notice to the donor, subject to a rule barring renunciation without court permission while the attorney is under an active duty to act; a court issues a termination order, on application by any interested person, if the court finds termination is in the donor's best interests (the court does not appoint a substitute attorney, though it may direct a trusteeship application or appoint an interim trustee); a trusteeship order is made over the donor; the donor or the attorney dies; or a trusteeship order is made over the attorney. An attorney who acts without knowledge that the EPOA has terminated is protected, and third parties who deal with such an attorney in good faith are protected too.

Notably, Alberta's Powers of Attorney Act text does not list the breakdown of a marriage or adult interdependent relationship as an automatic termination trigger, unlike British Columbia's Act. Whether that gap is filled elsewhere, such as the Family Law Act or the Adult Interdependent Relationships Act, was not confirmed from a primary source for this article, so no position is taken on it either way; confirm this specific point with a lawyer if it is relevant to your situation.

When a personal directive ends

A personal directive ceases to have effect on a specific matter once a regained-capacity determination is made, ceases entirely on the maker's death, and can be revoked, to the extent revoked, or ended by a court determination. A capable maker can revoke a personal directive through a stated date or event, a contradicting later directive, any document expressing an intent to revoke that meets the Act's signing formalities, or simply by destroying the original document (or documents) with the intent to revoke it, a physical-destruction method of revocation that is not available for an Alberta EPOA or under British Columbia's Act.

Fees and offence penalties

No filing or registration fee for creating either an EPOA or a personal directive is stated in either Act or on Alberta.ca's EPOA overview page. Alberta operates an optional information-registration scheme for personal directives, but this article has not confirmed the registry's exact name, how to access it, or whether any fee applies, so those details are not stated as fact here.

Two offence penalties are explicit in the Personal Directives Act and are worth knowing: wilfully destroying, concealing, or altering a personal directive without the maker's consent is an offence carrying a fine of up to $10,000, and conditioning residential accommodation on a person making a personal directive is also an offence carrying a fine of up to $10,000.

Powers of attorney and personal directives made outside Alberta

Alberta recognizes an out-of-province power of attorney as an Alberta enduring power of attorney if, under the law of the place where it was made, it was valid there and the attorney's authority is not terminated by the donor's later incapacity there, and this rule applies regardless of any agreement or waiver to the contrary. For personal directives, the Personal Directives Act states directly that a directive made outside Alberta which complies with the Act's requirements has the same effect as one made under Alberta's own law.

For related planning topics, see power of attorney in Canada, making a will in Canada, executor duties in Canada, and Alberta probate fees. For how Alberta defines an adult interdependent partner, see our guide to common-law relationships in Alberta.

Disclaimer

This article provides general information about enduring powers of attorney and personal directives in Alberta, and is not legal advice. Several points on this page are described as open or unverified rather than stated as fact: whether Alberta law sets any default on EPOA attorney compensation, whether any gift or loan ceiling applies to an EPOA attorney, whether any delegation restriction applies to an EPOA attorney, whether marriage or adult interdependent partnership breakdown automatically ends an attorney's authority, and the exact registry, access process, and fee, if any, for Alberta's optional personal-directive registration scheme. Confirm these points and current forms with the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee of Alberta or a lawyer before signing or relying on either document.