Sexting Laws in the Northern Territory: Age, Offences and the Sex Offender Register

In the Northern Territory, the Criminal Code Act 1983 makes it a serious offence to produce, possess, distribute or use a child in the making of child abuse material of anyone under 18, there is no statutory defence for a teenager who creates, keeps or forwards their own image or a peer's, and a young person who is convicted is not automatically placed on the sex offender register.

The Age Threshold and the Core Offences

Child abuse material offences in the Northern Territory sit in Part V, Division 2 of the Criminal Code Act 1983, sections 125A to 125F. Section 125A defines "child abuse material" but does not set an age of its own; it relies on the Code's general definitions in section 1, where an "adult" is a person of or over the age of 18 years and a "child" is a person who is not an adult. Chaining those two definitions puts the child abuse material age threshold at under 18.

A separate limb of the same section 125A, used only for the distinct offence of publishing an indecent article at section 125C, sets a 16-year threshold for one category of image. That 16-year limb does not apply to the core production, possession and distribution offences below; it is a narrower, adjacent rule that a reader should not extend to the rest of the Division.

The core offences, with their maximum penalties for an individual, are:

• Section 125B, production, possession, distribution, sale, or offering or advertising for sale or distribution, of child abuse material: up to 10 years imprisonment.
• Section 125C, publishing an indecent article (which reaches child content only through the 16-year sub-limb noted above): up to 2 years imprisonment.
• Section 125D, using or procuring a child, or someone who appears to be a child, for the production of child abuse material or for a pornographic or abusive performance: up to 14 years imprisonment.

Each section also carries a corporate penalty in penalty units, and section 125E extends liability to a corporate officer where a body corporate commits one of these offences.

Sending, Receiving or Forwarding an Image as a Teenager

The Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT) provides no peer, close-in-age, or self-image defence to any of these offences. The only defences written into section 125B and section 125D cover a law-enforcement or court officer acting in an official capacity, a person exercising a classification-related function, and possession for legitimate medical or health research; section 125C adds a defence for material published for a Commonwealth classification application. None of these turn on the age of the person who sent, received or forwarded the image.

That means a teenager who creates an image of themselves, keeps a peer's image on their phone, or forwards one to someone else can be charged under the same elements as an adult offender. The Territory draws the line at conduct and content, not at the offender's own age.

Registration and What a Court Can Order

The Child Protection (Offender Reporting and Registration) Act 2004 (NT) places section 125D in Schedule 1 (Class 1) and section 125B in Schedule 2 (Class 2); section 125C sits in Schedule 2 only where the material falls within the under-16 sub-limb.

Section 11(1)(a) of that Act sets a default rule: a person sentenced for a Class 1 or Class 2 offence they committed as a child, meaning under 18 at the time of the offence, is not a reportable offender. That is an automatic statutory exclusion, not something a young person has to apply for.

The exclusion is not absolute. Section 13(2) to (3) lets a court order that a young person comply with reporting obligations anyway, but only if the court is satisfied the person poses a risk to the lives or sexual safety of one or more children, and only at the time of sentencing. In plain terms, a young person convicted of an NT child abuse material offence is presumptively excluded from the register, and a court retains discretion to order registration where it finds an ongoing risk.

Adult Sharing: Lawful With Consent, a Different Offence Without It

Sexting between consenting adults is lawful. Sharing an intimate image of an adult without their consent is a different part of the Code entirely, Part VI Division 7A, which includes section 208AB (distributing) and section 208AC (threatening to distribute) an intimate image. For the full picture of non-consensual intimate image and deepfake law across Australia, including how each state and territory's offence is framed, see deepfake and intimate image laws in Australia.

No published NT Police or NT Legal Aid Commission guidance specific to youth sexting was located for this page; that gap is noted rather than filled with an assumption about how any individual case would be handled.

If NT Police Contact You or Your Teenager

What happens during a police interview, the right to silence, and the right to a lawyer are covered separately at Miranda rights in Australia. For the comparison across all eight Australian jurisdictions, age thresholds, penalties, and which states have a young-person defence, see sexting laws in Australia. For everyday legal topics generally, see the Australia everyday law hub.