Home Security Cameras and CCTV Law in Tasmania

Tasmania is one of only three Australian jurisdictions with no general optical or video surveillance statute at all, alongside Queensland and the ACT. A security camera's video generally falls outside state recording law entirely; its audio does not, and most consumer CCTV records sound by default, which is exactly why the microphone, not the lens, is where a Tasmanian homeowner is most likely to run into trouble.

Two Very Different Rules for One Camera

A modern security camera or video doorbell usually does two things at once: it records video, and it records audio. In Tasmania these are treated completely differently, because only one of them has a general state statute behind it. There is no Tasmanian equivalent to New South Wales' or South Australia's optical-surveillance provisions; video is simply not covered by a general surveillance offence in this state. Audio is a different story: the Listening Devices Act 1991 (Tas) applies in full to any device that captures a private conversation, camera or not.

Jurisdiction scope: This article addresses security camera and CCTV law in Tasmania under the Listening Devices Act 1991 (Tas) and the Police Offences Act 1935 (Tas). It does not address the equivalent rules in other Australian states or territories, several of which (New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia, South Australia, the Northern Territory) have a general optical-surveillance provision that Tasmania lacks; for the national picture, see CCTV and home security camera laws in Australia. For Tasmania's general recording rules, see Tasmania recording laws.

The Video: Largely Unregulated by State Recording Law

Because the Listening Devices Act 1991 covers only devices capable of recording or listening to a conversation, ordinary video of a driveway, yard, footpath or street is not caught by it at all, and there is no separate Tasmanian optical-surveillance Act to catch it instead. This is a genuinely unusual position by Australian standards. States such as New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory each have a dedicated optical-surveillance offence, generally built around a "private activity" test that restricts filming someone in a genuinely private setting even without audio. Tasmania, together with the ACT and Queensland, simply has no equivalent general offence.

That does not mean video is entirely unregulated. The Police Offences Act 1935 (Tas) ss.13A-13C address a narrower category of intrusive visual recording: observing or recording a person without consent where they are in a private place or engaged in a private act, or capturing their genital or anal region when covered only by underwear or bare. These provisions were inserted in 2007 and cover the core scenarios associated with voyeurism, upskirting and similar non-consensual image capture, but they are considerably narrower than a general optical-surveillance offence. Ordinary footage of a driveway, a front door, or a passer-by on a public footpath falls well outside them.

The Audio: Where Tasmania's Real CCTV Risk Sits

Section 5 of the Listening Devices Act 1991 applies the "private conversation" test to whatever a device with a microphone records, entirely independent of whether the video from the same device is regulated at all. A hushed conversation on an otherwise empty footpath outside your front door, captured by your doorbell's microphone, can still be a private conversation under the Act, even though filming the same footpath on video raises no state-law issue whatsoever. Homeowners typically think carefully about where the lens points and rarely consider that the microphone's practical range extends well beyond the camera's field of view, potentially picking up a neighbour's private phone call carried on a footpath, or a visitor's exchange at the front gate.

Tasmania's position is, if anything, less forgiving here than most other states. Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria each define "private conversation" with an explicit exclusion for circumstances where a party "ought reasonably to expect" to be overheard, which gives some comfort that a loud, obviously public exchange falls outside the Act. Tasmania's section 3 definition has no equivalent express exclusion. In most ordinary outdoor settings the practical outcome will likely be similar, because a genuinely public, loudly conducted exchange will rarely "reasonably indicate" a desire for privacy either way, but a fact pattern that would clearly fall outside the Act elsewhere cannot be assumed to fall outside it in Tasmania without checking the actual circumstances.

There is no built-in exception for accidental capture written specifically for security cameras. If audio meeting the "private conversation" definition is recorded without consent or a qualifying basis under s.5(3), the Act is engaged regardless of intent. The most practical response is to disable audio recording on outward-facing cameras and doorbells unless there is a specific reason to keep it enabled, or to keep the microphone's practical range within your own boundary.

Neighbour-Facing Cameras

Because there is no state optical-surveillance offence, pointing a camera's lens at a shared boundary, driveway or yard does not by itself raise a Tasmanian state-law problem the way it might in New South Wales (a trespass test) or South Australia and Western Australia (a private-activity test). The Police Offences Act's narrower provisions become relevant only if the camera is capturing something genuinely intimate, such as a view into a bathroom or bedroom window. If a dispute arises regardless, talking to the neighbour directly and checking local council requirements is usually the simplest path, since the legal exposure here sits mainly with the audio, not the picture.

Publishing Security Camera Footage

Recording footage lawfully does not automatically mean you can publish or share it, at least where audio of a private conversation is involved. Sections 9 and 10 of the Listening Devices Act 1991 restrict communicating or publishing a private conversation obtained through the Act, and this applies to footage with audio just as it does to a standalone recording. Sharing footage of a break-in with police is generally uncontroversial; posting footage more broadly, in a way that identifies a person and imputes wrongdoing, carries its own risk under the Act's publication provisions and can separately raise defamation exposure.

The Privacy Act and the New Statutory Tort

The federal Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) generally does not reach an individual operating a security camera in a purely personal, non-business capacity. That gap is now partly filled by the federal statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy, in force under Schedule 2 to the Privacy Act since 10 June 2025. Because the tort applies to any individual, not only organisations regulated by the Privacy Act, a domestic security camera that captures a genuinely private moment, whether through its lens or its microphone, could expose the camera's owner to a civil claim as well as potential criminal liability under the Listening Devices Act or the Police Offences Act. The tort requires the invasion to be intentional or reckless and serious; this article does not predict how a court would assess any specific camera setup.

Disclaimer: This article presents general legal information about security camera and CCTV law in Tasmania. It does not constitute legal advice. The information covers the Listening Devices Act 1991 (Tas), the Police Offences Act 1935 (Tas) and applicable Commonwealth legislation as in force as of 2026-07-22. Laws can change. If you have a specific legal situation, consult a legal practitioner admitted in Tasmania or the relevant Australian state or territory.

For Tasmania's general consent rules, see Tasmania recording laws. For recording conversations at work in Tasmania, see workplace recording in Tasmania. For recording phone calls in Tasmania, see phone call recording in Tasmania. For the national picture on CCTV and home security cameras, see CCTV and home security camera laws in Australia.

---

Last updated: 2026-07-22. Statutes cited reflect their in-force versions as of 2026-07-22.