Indiana
Indiana Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify and Get a Refund
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 12 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Indiana's lemon law (Ind. Code 24-5-13) covers new motor vehicles under 10,000 pounds with defects that substantially impair use, value, or safety. Buyers may claim a refund or replacement after four or more repair attempts for the same defect, or 30 or more business days out of service, as long as the defect was first reported within 18 months or 18,000 miles of delivery.
Overview of Indiana's Lemon Law
Indiana's Motor Vehicle Protection Act, codified at Indiana Code § 24-5-13, provides legal protection for consumers who purchase or lease new motor vehicles that turn out to have serious, unfixable defects. The law requires manufacturers to either refund or replace a qualifying vehicle after a reasonable number of repair attempts have failed.

The Indiana Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division oversees enforcement and certification of informal dispute settlement procedures under the statute. If you believe your vehicle qualifies as a lemon, you can contact the Attorney General's office at 1-800-382-5516 or file a complaint online.
What Vehicles Are Covered
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-5, the lemon law applies to specific types of motor vehicles. Understanding which vehicles qualify is the first step before pursuing a claim.
Covered Vehicle Types
- Passenger cars: Sedans, coupes, and hatchbacks sold or registered in Indiana
- Trucks: Pickup trucks and light trucks under 10,000 pounds GVWR
- SUVs and crossovers: Sport utility vehicles that fall under the weight limit
- Vans and minivans: Personal passenger vehicles
- Electric vehicles (EVs): Battery electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles under 10,000 pounds are covered the same as gas-powered vehicles
- Leased vehicles: Consumer leases exceeding four months
- Nonresident purchases: Vehicles sold to Indiana buyers who are nonresidents
Vehicles Not Covered
- Conversion vans: Vehicles modified by secondary manufacturers
- Motor homes: Recreational vehicles
- Farm tractors: Agricultural equipment
- Motorcycles and motor driven cycles: Explicitly excluded under the statute (IC 24-5-13-5); includes motorcycles and motor driven cycles
- Snowmobiles: Winter recreational vehicles
- Off-road vehicles: Vehicles designed primarily for off-highway use
- Vehicles over 10,000 pounds: Heavy trucks and commercial vehicles
Who Qualifies as a Buyer
A "buyer" under Indiana law is any person who enters into an agreement or contract within Indiana for the transfer, lease, or purchase of a motor vehicle for purposes other than resale or sublease. The definition focuses on the transaction location and purpose rather than the buyer's state of residence.
This also includes subsequent purchasers. If you buy a used vehicle that is still within the original term of protection, you may qualify for lemon law rights as a "buyer" under the statute.
Indiana's Lemon Law Presumption
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-15, the law creates a rebuttable presumption that a reasonable number of repair attempts have been made once either of two conditions is met and the nonconformity still exists. A separate defined period, the "term of protection," governs when the defect has to be reported.
Term of Protection
The term of protection begins on the date of original delivery and ends at the earlier of:
- 18 months after delivery, or
- 18,000 miles after delivery
The term of protection sets the window for reporting the defect. It does not cut off the repair attempts themselves.
When the Lemon Law Presumption Applies
| Condition | Requirement | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Repair attempts (same defect) | 4 or more attempts for the same nonconformity | No separate deadline; the attempts may continue after the term of protection ends |
| Days out of service | 30 or more business days for repair of any nonconformity | No separate deadline; the days may run past the term of protection |
| Nonconformity type | Must substantially impair use, market value, or safety | Must be first reported within the term of protection |
Both triggering conditions require that the nonconformity continues to exist after the repair attempts or out-of-service period.
Indiana Code § 24-5-13-15 sets no time limit of its own on when those attempts or out-of-service days must occur. What has to happen inside the term of protection is the buyer's report of the nonconformity under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-8, which then obligates the manufacturer to make the necessary repairs even if the repairs come after the term expires.
What Qualifies as a Nonconformity
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-6, a "nonconformity" means any specific or generic defect or condition, or concurrent combination of defects or conditions, that:
- Substantially impairs the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle, or
- Renders the motor vehicle nonconforming to the terms of the manufacturer's warranty
The defect does not need to make the vehicle undrivable. A persistent problem that significantly reduces the vehicle's value or creates a safety concern can qualify.
Examples of Covered Defects
- Engine or transmission failures
- Brake system malfunctions
- Steering problems affecting vehicle control
- Electrical system failures
- Persistent warning lights indicating major issues
- Air conditioning or heating system failures
- Fuel system problems
- Safety equipment defects (airbags, seatbelts)
- EV battery or charging system malfunctions
- Software errors that affect drivability or safety
Consumer Remedies: Refund vs. Replacement
When a vehicle qualifies as a lemon under Indiana law, the buyer has the right to choose between a refund or a replacement. Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-10, the manufacturer must provide the chosen remedy within 30 days.

Option 1: Vehicle Refund (Buyback)
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-11, if the buyer chooses a refund, the manufacturer must pay:
- Full contract price: Including all credits and allowances for trade-in vehicles
- Sales tax: All tax paid on the purchase
- Registration fees: Unexpended portion of prepaid registration and excise tax
- Finance charges: All finance charges actually expended
- Dealer-added options: Cost of options installed by the authorized dealer
Usage Deduction: The manufacturer may deduct a reasonable allowance for use, calculated as:
Usage Deduction = (Total Contract Price x Miles Before Return) / 100,000
For example, if your vehicle cost $40,000 and you drove 8,000 miles before returning it, the usage deduction would be $3,200.
Option 2: Replacement Vehicle
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-12, if the buyer chooses a replacement:
- The replacement must be a comparable vehicle
- The manufacturer must reimburse transfer of registration fees
- The manufacturer must reimburse any sales tax incurred
- If the original was financed by the manufacturer or its agent, refinancing terms cannot be less favorable
Additional Reimbursement
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-13, the manufacturer must also reimburse necessary towing costs and rental car expenses actually incurred as a direct result of the nonconformity.
Consumer's Option to Retain the Vehicle
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-14, the buyer has the option to keep using the returned vehicle until the manufacturer tenders a full refund or delivers a replacement. Any miles driven during this retention period will be reflected in the usage allowance calculation.
How to File a Lemon Law Claim in Indiana
Successfully pursuing a lemon law claim in Indiana requires careful documentation and strict compliance with procedural steps.
Step 1: Document Everything
- Keep all repair orders (dealers are required to provide them)
- Record the dates your vehicle was in the shop
- Document the symptoms you experienced each time
- Save all correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer
- Take photos or videos of the defects
- Maintain records of towing and rental car expenses
Good documentation is the foundation of a successful lemon law claim. Without repair orders and records of out-of-service dates, it becomes difficult to prove the statutory thresholds.
Step 2: Report the Nonconformity
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-8, you must report the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or an authorized dealer within the term of protection. Once reported during the term, the manufacturer must make necessary repairs even if the term of protection later expires.
Step 3: Notify the Manufacturer in Writing
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-9, you must notify the manufacturer of your claim in writing if:
- The manufacturer has clearly and conspicuously disclosed in the warranty or owner's manual that written notification is required
- The manufacturer has provided the name and address for sending the notification
If the manufacturer has not made the required disclosure in the warranty or owner's manual, you are not required to give written notice before proceeding.
Step 4: Use Informal Dispute Settlement (If Required)
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-19, you may be required to use an informal dispute settlement procedure before pursuing other remedies, but only if the procedure is certified by the Indiana Attorney General and you received adequate written notice from the manufacturer that the procedure exists.
Programs like BBB AUTO LINE handle arbitration for several major manufacturers. The process typically involves submitting your case file and attending a hearing where an independent arbitrator reviews the evidence.
Step 5: Contact the Attorney General
If you need assistance or want to file a complaint, contact the Indiana Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division:
- Phone: 1-800-382-5516
- Online: File a complaint
- Fax: 317-233-4393
Step 6: File Legal Action if Necessary
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-21, you may bring a civil action for violations of the lemon law. Prevailing consumers may recover reasonable attorney fees and court costs in addition to the refund or replacement remedy.
Arbitration Requirements
Indiana law addresses informal dispute settlement procedures in detail under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-19.
Certification Requirements
The lemon law does not apply to any buyer who has not first used an informal procedure established by or participated in by a manufacturer if both of the following are true:
- The procedure is certified by the Indiana Attorney General as complying in all respects with 16 CFR 703 (the federal informal dispute settlement regulations) and with any other certification rules the Attorney General adopts, and
- The buyer has received adequate written notice from the manufacturer that the procedure exists. Writing the procedure into the terms of the written warranty counts as adequate written notice.
If the manufacturer does not have a certified program, or has one but never gave you adequate written notice of it, no arbitration is required before filing suit.
Consumer Rights in Arbitration
- Right to present evidence and testimony
- Right to have an attorney present
- Right to receive a written decision with findings
- Right to reject an unfavorable decision and proceed to litigation
A decision by one of these mechanisms is not legally binding on anyone. Under 16 CFR 703.5(j), the manufacturer must act in good faith on the decision, and the decision is admissible in evidence in a later civil action over the warranty. Whether the decision goes your way or not, you can still file a lawsuit in court.
Manufacturer Defenses
Manufacturers may raise affirmative defenses under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-18.
Common Manufacturer Defenses
| Defense | Manufacturer's Argument | Consumer's Counter |
|---|---|---|
| No substantial impairment | Defect does not substantially impair use, value, or safety | Document how the defect affects daily use and safety |
| Consumer abuse or neglect | Defect caused by owner abuse or neglect | Provide maintenance records showing proper care |
| Unauthorized modifications | Problem resulted from unauthorized modifications | Show defect existed before modifications or is unrelated |
| Unauthorized alterations | Vehicle was altered by someone other than the manufacturer or dealer | Demonstrate that alterations did not cause the nonconformity |
Prohibited Conduct
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-16, a manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer may not refuse to diagnose or repair any vehicle for the purpose of avoiding liability under the lemon law. This anti-avoidance provision prevents dealers from turning away vehicles to keep repair attempt counts low.
Electric Vehicle Considerations
Electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrids that meet the weight and registration requirements are fully covered under Indiana's lemon law. The statute does not distinguish between powertrains, so battery electric, plug-in hybrid, and traditional gas-powered vehicles all receive the same protection.
EV-Specific Defects That May Qualify
- Battery pack degradation or failure within the term of protection
- Charging system malfunctions
- Software glitches that affect range, performance, or safety
- Thermal management system failures
- Regenerative braking problems
- Electric motor faults
Separate Battery Warranty
Most EV manufacturers provide a separate battery warranty (typically 8 years or 100,000 miles) in addition to the standard bumper-to-bumper warranty. Battery defects that occur within the lemon law's 18-month or 18,000-mile term of protection may qualify under both the lemon law and the battery warranty.
If a battery defect surfaces after the lemon law term expires but within the battery warranty period, the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act may provide an alternative path to relief.
Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act Overlay
Indiana's state lemon law is not the only protection available to buyers. The federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.) serves as a nationwide backstop for all consumers who receive a written warranty on a product costing more than $15. Under Magnuson-Moss, if a manufacturer fails to honor its warranty after a reasonable number of repair attempts, the consumer may sue in state or federal court for a refund, replacement, or damages including attorney fees. This federal remedy is especially useful when a defect surfaces after Indiana's 18-month or 18,000-mile window closes but while the manufacturer's written warranty remains active.
Buyback Vehicle Disclosure Rules
Indiana has a separate statute, Indiana Code § 24-5-13.5, that governs what happens when a lemon law buyback vehicle is resold. These rules protect the next buyer from unknowingly purchasing a vehicle with a documented defect history.
Title Branding Requirements
When a manufacturer repurchases or replaces a vehicle under the lemon law, it must stamp "Manufacturer Buyback - Disclosure on File" on the face of the original certificate of title. This branding remains on the title for the life of the vehicle.
Within 31 days of receiving the certificate of title, the manufacturer must apply to the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles for a new title in the manufacturer's name and provide a copy of the disclosure document.
Resale Requirements
These duties attach to the initial resale of a buyback vehicle under Indiana Code §§ 24-5-13.5-10 and 24-5-13.5-11. Before that first resale in Indiana, the dealer must:
- Provide the buyer with the written statement identifying the conditions that led the previous owner or lessee to return the vehicle
- Obtain the buyer's signed acknowledgment of that disclosure
- Provide the express warranty the manufacturer must supply, which need only run 12,000 miles or 12 months from the date of resale
The contract for that initial resale or lease must also carry the conspicuous disclosure language the statute prescribes. These two sections do not reach later resales of the same vehicle.
Penalties for Nondisclosure
A manufacturer or dealer who fails to comply with these buyback disclosure requirements commits a deceptive act under Indiana's consumer protection statutes. The Attorney General may pursue enforcement, and affected consumers may seek remedies including damages.
Leased Vehicle Rights
Indiana's lemon law includes specific provisions for leased vehicles under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-11.5.
Leased Vehicle Refund
If a leased motor vehicle qualifies as a lemon, the refund is distributed between the lessee and lessor as follows:
Lessee Receives:
- All deposit and lease payments paid to the lessor
- Credits and allowances for any trade-in vehicles
- Less a reasonable allowance for use
Lessor Receives:
- Purchase cost including freight and accessories
- Fees paid to obtain the lease
- Insurance premiums or costs expended for the lessee's benefit
- Sales tax paid by the lessor
- 5% of the lessor's purchase cost
- Less total payments received from the lessee
Usage Deduction for Leases
The usage deduction for leased vehicles is calculated as:
Usage Deduction = (Total Lease Obligation x Miles Before Return) / 100,000
Used Vehicle Protections
Indiana's Motor Vehicle Protection Act is primarily designed for new vehicles. However, several protections exist for used vehicle buyers.
Remaining Manufacturer Warranty
Indiana Code § 24-5-13-3 defines a "buyer" as any person who, for purposes other than resale or sublease, enters into an agreement or contract within Indiana for the transfer, lease, or purchase of a covered motor vehicle. The definition itself carries no term-of-protection qualifier, so a later purchaser can still be a buyer. What limits a used-vehicle claim in practice is the term of protection: the nonconformity still has to be reported within 18 months or 18,000 miles of the vehicle's original delivery.
Methamphetamine Vehicle Disclosure
Under Indiana Code §§ 24-5-13-16.1 and 24-5-13-16.2, Indiana law requires disclosure when selling any motor vehicle that was used to manufacture methamphetamine within the previous two years. Failure to disclose can result in:
- Decontamination at the seller's expense
- Reimbursement for the buyer's remediation costs
- Liquidated damages up to $10,000
Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
The federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act provides additional protections for used vehicle buyers who still have active warranty coverage. This federal law allows consumers to sue manufacturers for breach of warranty in state or federal court.
Statute of Limitations
Understanding the deadlines for filing a lemon law claim is critical under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-23.
Filing Deadlines
- Report the defect: The nonconformity must be reported to the manufacturer, agent, or dealer within 18 months or 18,000 miles of delivery (whichever comes first)
- Repair obligation continues: Once reported within the term, the manufacturer must continue to attempt repairs even if the term expires
- File a lawsuit: You must file a civil action within two years from the date you first reported the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer
Missing either deadline can bar your claim, so act promptly.
Tolling Provisions
The 30-business-day out-of-service period is extended by any period during which repair services are unavailable as a direct result of:
- A strike
- Civil unrest
- Fire or natural disaster
- A terrorist attack
- An act of God or an act of war
During these events, the manufacturer, its agent, or an authorized dealer must provide or arrange for free use of a vehicle for the affected consumer. The burden is on the manufacturer to show the event directly caused the failure to cure the nonconformity.
Dealer Liability Protections
Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-24, Indiana's lemon law does not impose liability on franchised dealers or create a cause of action against them. The law targets manufacturers, not the local dealership.
Additionally, manufacturers may not directly or indirectly shift lemon law liability onto their franchised dealers. This provision ensures that dealers cooperate with consumers during the repair process without fear of financial repercussions.
Tips for Strengthening Your Lemon Law Claim
Following these practical steps can improve your chances of a successful outcome:
- Start a written log from day one. Record every symptom, every visit, and every conversation with the dealership service department.
- Request copies of all repair orders. Indiana dealers are required to provide them. Do not leave without your paperwork.
- Send written notice by certified mail. Even if not required, having proof of delivery strengthens your case.
- Do not authorize unrelated repairs during lemon law service visits. Keep the focus on the nonconformity.
- Check NHTSA for recalls and complaints. The NHTSA complaints database may show that other owners have reported the same problem with your vehicle.
- Consult a lemon law attorney before accepting a settlement. Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-22, prevailing consumers recover reasonable attorney fees, so many attorneys take these cases on contingency.
More Indiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How many repair attempts does Indiana require before a vehicle is considered a lemon?
Under Indiana law, a vehicle may qualify as a lemon after four or more repair attempts for the same nonconformity that substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of the vehicle. Alternatively, if the vehicle is out of service for 30 or more business days due to repairs for any nonconformities, it may also qualify. The nonconformity must be first reported to the manufacturer, its agent, or an authorized dealer within 18 months or 18,000 miles of delivery, but the repair attempts and out-of-service days themselves can continue after that window closes.
Do I need a lawyer to file an Indiana lemon law claim?
You can pursue a claim without an attorney, but legal representation often improves outcomes. Under Indiana Code § 24-5-13-22, prevailing consumers may recover reasonable attorney fees and costs, so many lemon law attorneys offer representation on a contingency basis with no upfront cost.
Does Indiana's lemon law cover used cars?
The Motor Vehicle Protection Act primarily covers new vehicles. However, if a used vehicle is still within the original term of protection (18 months or 18,000 miles from first delivery), the subsequent buyer may have lemon law rights. Used car buyers may also have protections under the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act if an active warranty exists.
What is the usage deduction in an Indiana lemon law refund?
The usage deduction is calculated by multiplying the total contract price by the number of miles driven before return, then dividing by 100,000. For example, if your vehicle cost $40,000 and you drove 8,000 miles, the deduction would be $3,200.
Are electric vehicles covered under Indiana's lemon law?
Yes. Indiana's lemon law applies to all qualifying motor vehicles under 10,000 pounds, regardless of powertrain type. Battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids are covered the same as gas-powered vehicles. Common EV defects like battery failures, charging system problems, and software errors that affect safety or drivability may qualify as nonconformities.
Can the dealer be held liable under Indiana's lemon law?
No. Indiana Code § 24-5-13-24 specifically provides that nothing in the chapter imposes liability on a dealer or creates a cause of action against a dealer. The law holds manufacturers responsible. Additionally, manufacturers may not directly or indirectly shift lemon law liability onto their franchised dealers.
What happens if the manufacturer has no arbitration program?
If the manufacturer has not established a certified informal dispute settlement procedure, you are not required to go through arbitration before pursuing other remedies. The same is true if a certified program exists but the manufacturer never gave you adequate written notice that it exists. In either case you can proceed directly with your claim or file a civil lawsuit in court.
Updates
Corrected the lemon-law presumption timing (the 18-month or 18,000-mile term of protection limits when the defect must be reported, not when the repair attempts or out-of-service days occur), the effect of an informal dispute settlement decision, the written-notice condition on Indiana's arbitration prerequisite, the statutory definition of "buyer", and the scope of the buyback resale disclosure duties.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Indiana Code, TITLE 24. TRADE REGULATION
§ 24-5-13-10Return of vehicle upon failure to correct nonconformity; refund; replacementIn force
Sec. 10. If, after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer is unable to correct the nonconformity, the manufacturer shall accept the return of the vehicle from the buyer and, at the buyer's option, either, within thirty (30) days, refund the amount paid by the buyer or provide a replacement vehicle of comparable value.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13-15Attempts to correct nonconformity; reasonable number of attempts; time period; extensionIn force
Sec. 15. (a) A reasonable number of attempts is considered to have been undertaken to correct a nonconformity if: (1) the nonconformity has been subject to repair at least four (4) times by the manufacturer or its agents or authorized dealers, but the nonconformity continues to exist; or (2) the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of any nonconformity for a cumulative total of at least thirty (30) business days, and the nonconformity continues to exist. (b) The thirty (30) business day period in subsection (a)(2) shall be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available as a direct result of a strike, a period of civil unrest, a fire, a natural disaster, a terrorist attack, an act of God, or an act of war. The manufacturer, its agent, or an authorized dealer shall provide or make provision for the free use of a vehicle to any buyer whose vehicle is out of service by reason of repair during a strike, a period of civil unrest, a fire, a natural disaster, a terrorist attack, an act of God, or an act of war.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- General Motors Corp. v. Sheets (Indiana Court of Appeals 2004, 818 N.E.2d 49)“…rty business days and the nonconformity continues to exist. I.C. § 24-5-13-15. If a refund is given for a vehicle w…”
- Mudd, James A. v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2006, 178 F. App'x 545)“…pts at repair by the manufacturer or its agents or dealers. Ind. Code § 24-5-13-15. But the law applies only for a defined…”
- Bordoni v. Forest River, Inc. (District Court, N.D. Indiana 2020)“…lemon law, not the law on breach of warranty. Id. (citing Ind. Code § 24-5-13-15). Under Indian…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 24-5-13-6"Nonconformity"In force
Sec. 6. As used in this chapter, "nonconformity" means any specific or generic defect or condition or any concurrent combination of defects or conditions that: (1) substantially impairs the use, market value, or safety of a motor vehicle; or (2) renders the motor vehicle nonconforming to the terms of an applicable manufacturer's warranty.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- General Motors Corp. v. Sheets (Indiana Court of Appeals 2004, 818 N.E.2d 49)“…impairs the use, market value or safety of a motor vehicle. I.C. § 24-5-13-6. A reasonable number of attempts is con…”
- Glenn Thomas v. Valpo Motors Inc. (Indiana Supreme Court 2025)“…to eighteen months or 18,000 miles (whichever comes first). Ind. Code §§ 24-5-13-6, -7. See also Harold Greenberg, The Ind…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 24-5-13-11Refund; computation of amountIn force
Sec. 11. (a) If a refund is tendered under this chapter with respect to a vehicle that is not a leased vehicle, the refund must be the full contract price of the vehicle, including all credits and allowances for any trade-in vehicle and less a reasonable allowance for use. (b) To determine a reasonable allowance for use under this section, multiply: (1) the total contract price of the vehicle; by (2) a fraction having as its denominator one hundred thousand (100,000) and having as its numerator the number of miles that the vehicle traveled before the manufacturer's acceptance of its return. (c) The refund must also include reimbursement for the following incidental costs: (1) All sales tax. (2) The unexpended portion of the registration fee and excise tax that has been prepaid for any calendar year. (3) All finance charges actually expended. (4) The cost of all options added by the authorized dealer. (d) Refunds made under this section shall be made to the buyer and lienholder, if any, as their respective interests appear on the records of ownership.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2004
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- General Motors Corp. v. Sheets (Indiana Court of Appeals 2004, 818 N.E.2d 49)“…y trade-in vehicle and less a reasonable allowance for use. I.C. § 24-5-13-11. Indiana Code section 24-5-13-11 explai…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 24-5-13-12Replacement of vehicleIn force
Sec. 12. (a) If a vehicle is replaced by a manufacturer under this chapter, the manufacturer shall reimburse the buyer for any fees for the transfer of registration or any sales tax incurred by the buyer as a result of replacement. (b) If a replaced vehicle was financed by the manufacturer, its subsidiary, or agent, the manufacturer, subsidiary, or agent may not require the buyer to enter into any refinancing agreement concerning a replacement vehicle that would create any financial obligations upon the buyer less favorable than those of the original financing agreement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13-13Reimbursement for towing and rental costsIn force
Sec. 13. Whenever a vehicle is replaced or refunded under this chapter, the manufacturer shall reimburse the buyer for necessary towing and rental costs actually incurred as a direct result of the nonconformity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13-8Repair of nonconformitiesIn force
Sec. 8. If a motor vehicle suffers from a nonconformity and the buyer reports the nonconformity within the term of protection to the manufacturer of the vehicle, its agent, or its authorized dealer then the manufacturer of the motor vehicle or the manufacturer's agent or authorized dealer shall make the repairs that are necessary to correct the nonconformity, even if the repairs are made after expiration of the term of protection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2018
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Adam Boots v. D. Young Chevrolet, LLC d/b/a Penske Chevrolet, and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (Indiana Court of Appeals 2018, 93 N.E.3d 793)“…suffers from nonconformities or defects pursuant to I.C. § 24-5-13-8. I.C. § 24-5-13.5-3. A buyback…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 24-5-13-9Notification of claim; manufacturer's disclosureIn force
Sec. 9. (a) A buyer must first notify the manufacturer of a claim under this chapter if the manufacturer has made the disclosure required by subsection (b). However, if the manufacturer has not made the required disclosure, the buyer is not required to notify the manufacturer of a claim under this chapter. (b) The manufacturer shall clearly and conspicuously disclose to the buyer, in the warranty or owner's manual, that written notification of the nonconformity is required before the buyer may be eligible for a refund or replacement of the vehicle. The manufacturer shall include with the warranty or owner's manual the name and address to which the buyer must send notification.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13-16Refusal to diagnose or repair; written repair ordersIn force
Sec. 16. (a) A manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer may not refuse to diagnose or repair any vehicle for the purpose of avoiding liability under this chapter. (b) A manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer shall provide a buyer with a written repair order each time the buyer's vehicle is brought in for examination or repair. The repair order must indicate all work performed on the vehicle including examination of the vehicle, parts, and labor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13-18Affirmative defensesIn force
Sec. 18. It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this chapter that: (1) the nonconformity, defect, or condition does not substantially impair the use, value, or safety of the motor vehicle; or (2) the nonconformity, defect, or condition is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modification or alteration of the motor vehicle by the buyer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13-19Informal procedures established by manufacturerIn force
Sec. 19. This chapter does not apply to any buyer who has not first resorted to an informal procedure established by a manufacturer or in which a manufacturer participates if: (1) the procedure is certified by the attorney general as: (A) complying in all respects with 16 C.F.R. 703; and (B) complying with any other rules concerning certification adopted by the attorney general, including but not limited to the requirement of oral hearings, pursuant to IC 4-22-2; and (2) the buyer has received adequate written notice from the manufacturer of the existence of the procedure. Adequate written notice includes the incorporation of the informal dispute settlement procedure into the terms of the written warranty to which the motor vehicle does not conform.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13-23LimitationsIn force
Sec. 23. (a) This subsection does not apply to an action concerning a violation of section 16.1 of this chapter. An action brought under this chapter must be commenced within two (2) years following the date the buyer first reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer. (b) This subsection does not apply to an action concerning a violation of section 16.1 of this chapter. When the buyer has commenced an informal dispute settlement procedure described in section 19 of this chapter, the two (2) year period specified in subsection (a) is tolled during the time the informal dispute settlement procedure is being conducted. (c) An action concerning a violation of section 16.1 of this chapter must be commenced within two (2) years following the date of the violation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Joyce v. Forest River, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Florida 2024)“…stoppel argument unpersuasive. Plaintiff next argues that Ind. Code Ann. § 24-5-13-23, part of Indiana’s Motor Vehicle Prote…”
- Pincast v. General RV Center (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2019)“…irst notifies the manufacturer of a defect in the vehicle. Ind. Code § 24-5-13-23. Therefore, under the most restrictive…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 24-5-13-24Dealer's liabilityIn force
Sec. 24. This section does not apply to a transaction or solicited transaction relating to a methamphetamine vehicle. Nothing in this chapter imposes any liability on a dealer or creates a cause of action by a consumer against a dealer, and a manufacturer may not, directly or indirectly, expose any franchised dealer to liability under this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2000
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Nielsen Buick Jeep Eagle Subaru v. Hall (Indiana Court of Appeals 2000, 726 N.E.2d 358)“…er of the automobile and not a dealer. See I.C. § 24-5-13-24. In support of its position, Nielsen po…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 24-5-13-16.1Seller's duty to disclose methamphetamine vehiclesIn force
Sec. 16.1. (a) If a dealer or seller knows or reasonably should know that a motor vehicle is a methamphetamine vehicle, the dealer or seller shall disclose, in writing, to the buyer, prospective buyer, lessee, or prospective lessee that the motor vehicle is a methamphetamine vehicle. (b) The written disclosure required under subsection (a) shall be provided before the dealer or seller sells, leases, exchanges, transfers, or accepts payment from a buyer, prospective buyer, lessee, or prospective lessee. (c) A dealer may include a decontamination report or other relevant document with the written disclosure required under subsection (a).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13-16.2Civil action by buyer for failure to disclose methamphetamine vehicles; remediesIn force
Sec. 16.2. (a) In addition to any other remedy or penalty provided in this chapter, if a dealer or seller fails to make a disclosure required under section 16.1 of this chapter, a buyer or lessee may bring a civil action against the dealer or seller. (b) In an action brought by a buyer or lessee under this section, a court may order a dealer or seller to perform either of the following: (1) Decontaminate or contract for the decontamination of the methamphetamine vehicle in accordance with and to a standard set forth under 318 IAC 1. (2) Reimburse a buyer or lessee who incurred damages or expenses to remediate or decontaminate a methamphetamine vehicle to address the nonconformity. (c) In addition to the remedies described in subsection (b), a court may award liquidated damages to a buyer or lessee in an amount not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (d) This section does not eliminate or abrogate existing tort remedies that may be available to a buyer or lessee.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 24-5-13.5-10Initial resale; conditionsIn force
Sec. 10. (a) This section applies to a buyback vehicle only at the time of the initial resale of the buyback vehicle. (b) A buyback vehicle may not be sold in Indiana unless the following conditions have been met: (1) The manufacturer provides the same express warranty the manufacturer provided to the original purchaser, except that the term of the warranty need only last for twelve thousand (12,000) miles or twelve (12) months after the date of resale. (2) The following disclosure language must be conspicuously contained in a contract for the initial resale or lease of a buyback vehicle to a consumer or contained in a form affixed to the contract: "IMPORTANT This vehicle was previously sold as new. It was subsequently returned to the manufacturer or authorized dealer in exchange for a replacement vehicle or a refund because it did not conform to the manufacturer's express warranty and the nonconformity was not cured within a reasonable time as provided by Indiana law.".
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2018
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Adam Boots v. D. Young Chevrolet, LLC d/b/a Penske Chevrolet, and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (Indiana Court of Appeals 2018, 93 N.E.3d 793)“…dissatisfaction in 10-point all capital type. I.C. § 24-5-13.5-10. Prior to “reselling a buyback vehicle…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 24-5-13-5"Motor vehicle" or "vehicle"In force
Sec. 5. As used in this chapter, "motor vehicle" or "vehicle" means any self-propelled vehicle that: (1) has a declared gross vehicle weight of less than ten thousand (10,000) pounds; (2) is sold to: (A) a buyer in Indiana and registered in Indiana; or (B) a buyer in Indiana who is a nonresident (as defined in IC 9-13-2-113); (3) is intended primarily for use and operation on public highways; and (4) is required to be registered or licensed before use or operation. The term does not include conversion vans, motor homes, farm tractors, and other machines used in the actual production, harvesting, and care of farm products, road building equipment, truck tractors, road tractors, motorcycles, motor driven cycles, snowmobiles, or vehicles designed primarily for off-road use.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pizel v. Monaco Coach Corp. (District Court, N.D. Indiana 2005, 364 F. Supp. 2d 790)“…excludes motor homes from its parameters. See Ind.Code § 24-5-13-5. Plaintiff states that “while this Cour…”
- Joyce v. Forest River, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Florida 2024)“…methamphetamine vehicles” within certain requirements) and Ind. Code Ann. § 24-5-13-5 (West) (expressly excluding “motor home…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 16
§ 703.5Operation of the Mechanism.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) The Mechanism shall establish written operating procedures which shall include at least those items specified in paragraphs (b) through (j) of this section. Copies of the written procedures shall be made available to any person upon request. (b) Upon notification of a dispute, the Mechanism shall immediately inform both the warrantor and the consumer of receipt of the dispute. (c) The Mechanism shall investigate, gather and organize all information necessary for a fair and expeditious decision in each dispute. When any evidence gathered by or submitted to the Mechanism raises issues relating to the number of repair attempts, the length of repair periods, the possibility of unreasonable use of the product, or any other issues relevant in light of Title I of the Act (or rules thereunder), including issues relating to consequential damages, or any other remedy under the Act (or rules thereunder), the Mechanism shall investigate these issues.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 50 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Cunningham v. Fleetwood Homes of Georgia, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2001, 253 F.3d 611)“…ed by the Federal Trade Commission.3 See id. § 2310(a)(2); 16 C.F.R. § 703.5(j) (1999). Fleetwood argues t…”
- Fred F. Wolf v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 1987, 829 F.2d 1277)“…s information that contradicts facts submitted by a party. 16 C.F.R. § 703.5 (c). It may allow oral presentations if…”
- Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of the United States, Inc. v. Abrams (District Court, S.D. New York 1988, 697 F. Supp. 726)“…arrantor and consumer expressly agree to the presentation ( 16 C.F.R. § 703.5 (f)(1)). 2) a requirement making…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify and Get a Refund, Mississippi Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, North Carolina Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
United States Code Title 15
§ 2301DefinitionsIn forcecited in 41 of our articles
For the purposes of this chapter: The term “consumer product” means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. The term “consumer” means a buyer (other than for purposes of resale) of any consumer product, any person to whom such product is transferred during the duration of an implied or written warranty (or service contract) applicable to the product, and any other person who is entitled by the terms of such warranty (or service contract) or under applicable State law to enforce against the warrantor (or service contractor) the obligations of the warranty (or service contract). The term “supplier” means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers. The term “warrantor” means any supplier or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty or who is or may be obligated under an implied warranty.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,671 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (1986) held that except where Magnuson-Moss expressly prescribes a rule, the Act applies state written and implied warranty law, citing Section 2301(7)'s definition of implied warranty as one arising under state law. Birdsong v. Apple (2009) dismissed Act claims once the state warranty claims failed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1986, 807 F.2d 1000)✓Ford owners sought nationwide classes over transmissions that slipped from park into reverse; reading Section 2301(7) and (6), the D.C. Circuit held Magnuson-Moss applies state warranty law except where the Act expressly prescribes a rule, and vacated class certification.
- Birdsong v. Apple, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2009, 590 F.3d 955)✓iPod buyers alleged the player risked hearing loss; because Section 2301(7) ties implied warranty to state law, the Ninth Circuit treated the Magnuson-Moss claim as standing or falling with the California warranty claims and affirmed dismissal once those failed.
- Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2004, 377 F.3d 1034)“…gnizable under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. This consumer dis…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: US Lemon Laws (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Alabama Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify and Get a Refund, Arkansas Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
Sources and References
- Indiana Motor Vehicle Protection Act (IC 24-5-13)(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Attorney General Consumer Protection Division(in.gov).gov
- Indiana Attorney General - File a Consumer Complaint(in.gov).gov
- Indiana Attorney General Lemon Law Guide (PDF)(in.gov).gov
- IN.gov - Indiana Lemon Law Requirements FAQ(faqs.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles(in.gov).gov
- Indiana Buyback Vehicle Disclosure Act (IC 24-5-13.5)(iga.in.gov).gov
- NHTSA Vehicle Complaints and Recalls(nhtsa.gov).gov
- Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (FTC)(ftc.gov).gov
- 16 CFR 703 - Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures(ecfr.gov).gov
- BBB AUTO LINE Arbitration Program(bbbprograms.org)
- Indiana Code § 24-5-13 - Motor Vehicle Protection Act(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Code § 24-5-13.5 - Buyback Vehicle Disclosure(iga.in.gov).gov
- 16 CFR 703.5 - Mechanism operation (decisions not legally binding; warrantor good faith)(ecfr.gov)