North Dakota
North Dakota Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

To win a slip and fall claim in North Dakota, an injured person must prove that the property owner was negligent, that the owner had actual or constructive notice of the hazard, and that the hazard caused the injury. North Dakota uses modified comparative fault, so partial responsibility reduces (and can bar) recovery.
Proving a slip and fall claim in North Dakota
Every person lawfully on a property in North Dakota is owed a duty of reasonable care by the possessor. That standard comes from a single unified duty rule that the North Dakota Supreme Court established in O'Leary v. Coenen, 251 N.W.2d 746 (N.D. 1977), eliminating the old distinctions between licensees and invitees. The owner does not guarantee safety, but must act as a reasonable person would under the circumstances.
The most contested element in most slip and fall cases is notice. You must show the owner either knew the hazard existed (actual notice) or that it had been present long enough that a reasonable inspection would have discovered it (constructive notice). A spill that happened moments before your fall is treated very differently from one that sat on a floor for hours.
Causation is equally critical: you must connect the specific hazard to your specific injury. Medical records, surveillance video, incident reports, and witness statements all help establish this link. The stronger your documentation from the scene, the better positioned you will be to show that the owner's failure to act caused your harm.
The open-and-obvious doctrine in North Dakota
North Dakota does NOT treat an open-and-obvious hazard as a complete bar to the landowner's duty of care. The North Dakota Supreme Court addressed this directly in Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co., 2004 ND 55, 676 N.W.2d 763, adopting the framework of Restatement (Second) of Torts section 343A.

Under that framework, even when a danger is known or obvious to the entrant, the possessor is still not relieved of the duty of reasonable care if it had reason to anticipate that the person would encounter the hazard anyway. Classic examples include situations where the entrant's attention is distracted, or where the advantages of crossing a hazardous area outweigh the apparent risk. A construction worker who must walk past a known wet floor to reach the only exit is a common illustration.
In practice, obviousness and any distracting circumstances are fed into North Dakota's modified comparative-fault analysis under N.D.C.C. chapter 32-03.2 rather than cutting off the owner's duty entirely. If the hazard was obvious and you walked into it carelessly, your recovery is reduced, but it is not automatically eliminated.
Ice, snow, and natural accumulation in North Dakota
North Dakota's treatment of ice and snow liability is best described as mixed. The state does not follow a blanket no-duty rule that would immunize every landowner for naturally accumulated ice or snow.
For ordinary developed and occupied premises (sidewalks, building entrances, parking lot walkways, and stairs), the court applies the general reasonable-care standard under Restatement (Second) of Torts sections 343 and 343A. That means a property owner in Fargo or Bismarck cannot simply point to the weather and walk away from liability when ice forms at the front door of a commercial building.
The natural-accumulation no-duty rule does exist, but the North Dakota Supreme Court has confined it to narrow settings. In Papenhausen v. ConocoPhillips Co., 2024 ND 40, 4 N.W.3d 220, the court confirmed the rule can apply at a remote, rural oil-well site where continuous ice clearing is unreasonable. The court also clarified a key exception: even where the natural-accumulation rule would otherwise apply, it does not protect an owner when ice or snow conceals a separate, substantially more dangerous condition (such as a hole in the ground), in which case ordinary duty and foreseeability analysis governs.
The practical takeaway is that falls on ice near most businesses, apartment complexes, and other developed properties in North Dakota are not automatically defeated by the weather defense.
How fault is shared: North Dakota's negligence rule
North Dakota follows modified comparative fault under . This means a jury assigns a percentage of fault to each party, and the plaintiff's damages are reduced proportionally by their own percentage of fault.

The key threshold is the "not as great as" standard: a plaintiff may recover only if their contributing fault is LESS THAN the combined fault of all other parties. A plaintiff who is exactly 50% at fault recovers nothing. A plaintiff who is 49% at fault recovers 51% of their damages. Being found precisely at the tipping point costs you the entire verdict.
North Dakota also uses several-only liability among multiple defendants (each defendant pays its own percentage share), except for those who act in concert. This matters if your fall involved both a business owner and a property maintenance contractor: each pays their own share, and you cannot collect one defendant's portion from another.
Deadlines: statute of limitations and government claims
North Dakota's personal injury statute of limitations is 6 years under (5), one of the longest in the United States. This is a meaningful advantage for injured plaintiffs who may need time to assess the full extent of their injuries or reach maximum medical improvement before filing.
Important exceptions apply. Wrongful death claims must be filed within 2 years from the date of death. Claims against minors: the clock is generally tolled until age 18. You can review how North Dakota's deadlines compare to other states on the North Dakota statute of limitations page.
Government property falls carry separate, stricter deadlines. If you were hurt on STATE property or by a state employee's negligence, (1)(a) requires a written notice of claim submitted to the director of the Office of Management and Budget within 180 days after the injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. A death claim may be presented within 1 year. The notice requirement is tolled while the injured person is incapacitated by the injury and is waived entirely for claims based on sexual assault or abuse.
Falls on CITY or COUNTY property are treated differently. Claims against political subdivisions under N.D.C.C. chapter 32-12.1 have no statewide pre-suit notice-of-claim requirement, but they do carry a 3-year statute of limitations under section 32-12.1-10(1), and statutory damage caps apply.
What a North Dakota slip and fall claim is worth
A successful slip and fall claim in North Dakota can include economic damages and non-economic damages. Economic damages cover your calculable financial losses: medical bills, future medical treatment costs, lost wages, reduced future earning capacity, and out-of-pocket expenses like transportation to appointments and prescription costs.

Non-economic damages compensate for the less tangible harms: physical pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and permanent disability or disfigurement. North Dakota does not currently impose a general cap on non-economic damages in personal injury cases, though damages against government defendants are subject to statutory caps under chapters 32-12.1 and 32-12.2.
Your ultimate recovery is reduced proportionally by your assigned percentage of fault under the modified comparative-fault rule. If a jury finds your damages total $200,000 but you were 30% at fault, you collect $140,000. If you were 50% or more at fault, you collect nothing.
To get a rough sense of potential value ranges, you can use our North Dakota slip and fall settlement calculator.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Premises liability law varies by state and changes, and case values depend on the specific facts. For advice about a specific fall, consult a licensed attorney in North Dakota.
Explore more on the slip and fall laws hub or see how other states compare. For a quick estimate of your claim's potential value, visit the North Dakota slip and fall settlement calculator.
More North Dakota Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I prove a slip and fall in North Dakota?
You must show the property owner owed you a duty of reasonable care, that a hazard existed on the premises, that the owner had actual or constructive notice of the hazard and failed to address it, and that the hazard directly caused your injury. Document the scene immediately with photos, preserve footwear, and gather contact information from witnesses.
Is North Dakota an open-and-obvious state?
No. North Dakota does not use open-and-obvious as an automatic bar. Under Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co. (2004 ND 55) and Restatement (Second) of Torts section 343A, the landowner still owes reasonable care if it should have anticipated you would encounter the hazard despite its obviousness. Obviousness is treated as a factor in comparative fault, not a complete defense.
Can I sue for falling on ice in North Dakota?
Often yes. North Dakota's natural-accumulation no-duty rule is limited to remote or unimproved land. For sidewalks, entrances, parking lots, and other developed occupied premises, owners owe ordinary reasonable care even for naturally accumulated ice and snow. Additionally, if ice or snow conceals a separate dangerous condition such as a hole, the owner cannot claim no duty regardless of where the property is located.
How long do I have to file a slip and fall lawsuit in North Dakota?
Six years under N.D.C.C. section 28-01-16(5) for most personal injury claims. But if you were hurt on state property, you must file a written notice of claim with the Office of Management and Budget within 180 days. Falls on city or county property have no pre-suit notice requirement but a 3-year statute of limitations.
Can I recover if I was partly at fault for my fall in North Dakota?
Yes, as long as your fault is less than the combined fault of all other parties. Under North Dakota's modified-50 rule, your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault. However, if you are found to be 50% or more at fault, you are barred from recovery entirely.
How much is a North Dakota slip and fall claim worth?
It depends on your medical costs, lost wages, long-term disability, and the severity of your pain and suffering. There is no general cap on non-economic damages in private premises liability cases. Government-defendant cases are subject to statutory caps. Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault. Use our slip and fall settlement calculator for a rough estimate based on your specific numbers.
Injured in North Dakota? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a North Dakota personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Dakota Century Code
§ 28-01-16Actions having six-year limitationsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
The following actions must be commenced within six years after the claim for relief has accrued: An action upon a contract, obligation, or liability, express or implied, subject to the provisions of sections 28-01-15 and 41-02-104. An action upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture, when not otherwise expressly provided. An action for trespass upon real property. An action for taking, detaining, or injuring any goods or chattels, including actions for the specific recovery of personal property. An action for criminal conversation or for any other injury to the person or rights of another not arising upon contract, when not otherwise expressly provided. An action for relief on the ground of fraud in all cases both at law and in equity, the claim for relief in such case not to be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 116 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Diocese of Bismarck Trust v. Ramada, Inc. (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 553 N.W.2d 760)“…e considered whether the six-year statute of limitations in N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16, or the two-year statute of limitations…”
- Wells v. First American Bank West (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 598 N.W.2d 834)“…of the claim as barred by the statute of limitations. Under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16: The following actions must be commen…”
- Kimball v. Landeis (North Dakota Supreme Court 2002, 652 N.W.2d 330)“…mitations for his claim against Landeis is six years. See N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16; Lang v. Barrios, 472 N.W.2d 464, 4…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Dakota Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, North Dakota Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim, North Dakota Debt Collection Laws: The Uniform 6-Year Deadline and Strong Firing Protection
§ 32-03.2-02Modified comparative faultIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
Contributory fault does not bar recovery in an action by any person to recover damages for death or injury to person or property unless the fault was as great as the combined fault of all other persons who contribute to the injury, but any damages allowed must be diminished in proportion to the amount of contributing fault attributable to the person recovering. The court may, and when requested by any party, shall direct the jury to find separate special verdicts determining the amount of damages and the percentage of fault attributable to each person, whether or not a party, who contributed to the injury. The court shall then reduce the amount of such damages in proportion to the amount of fault attributable to the person recovering.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 59 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Hurt v. Freeland (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 589 N.W.2d 551)“…Hurt argues the Olsons are jointly liable with Meyer under N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-02, which deals with comparative fault and…”
- Stewart v. Ryan (North Dakota Supreme Court 1994, 520 N.W.2d 39)“…incorporated the modified comparative “fault” provisions of N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-02. The effect of the enactment of the com…”
- McLean v. Kirby Co. (North Dakota Supreme Court 1992, 490 N.W.2d 229)“…fault" both "negligence" and "reckless or willful conduct." NDCC 32-03.2-02. That statute, however, "applies only t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Motorcycle Accident Laws in North Dakota (2026): Deadlines, Truck Accident Laws in North Dakota (2026): Deadlines & Liability
§ 32-12.2-04Notice required - Payment of claimsIn force
A person bringing a claim against the state or a state employee for an injury shall present to the director of the office of management and budget within one hundred eighty days after the alleged injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered a written notice of the alleged claim stating the time, place, and circumstances of the claim, the names of any state employees known to be involved, and the amount of compensation or other relief demanded. If the claim is one for serious injury, notice must be presented to the director of the office of management and budget within one year after the alleged serious injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. For purposes of this section, "serious injury" has the meaning as provided in section 26.1-41-01. The time for giving the notice does not include the time during which a person injured is incapacitated by the injury from giving the notice. The time for giving the notice is waived for a claim for relief that resulted from sexual assault, sexual abuse, gross sexual imposition, or any other claim based on a sexual act or sexual contact as defined in chapter 12.1-20.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 33 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Ungar v. North Dakota State University (North Dakota Supreme Court 2006, 721 N.W.2d 16)“…properly concluded Ungar failed to give timely notice under N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-04 and failed to exhaust his remedies, we…”
- Earnest v. Garcia (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 601 N.W.2d 260)“…t neither complied with the notice-of-claim requirements of N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-04(1), nor identified a viable cause of ac…”
- Dimond v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Higher Education (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 603 N.W.2d 66)“…ministrative remedies, it was March 17, 1996. Assuming that NDCC 32-12.2-04 applies to a contract claim, which seem…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): North Dakota Century Code § 32-12.1-01 (Legislative intent)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- N.D.C.C. section 28-01-16 (6-year personal injury statute of limitations)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D.C.C. section 32-03.2-02 (modified comparative fault)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D.C.C. section 32-12.2-04 (state notice of claim, 180 days)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D.C.C. chapter 32-12.1 (political-subdivision liability, 3-year SOL)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co., 2004 ND 55, 676 N.W.2d 763 (open-and-obvious; Restatement section 343A)(courtlistener.com)
- Papenhausen v. ConocoPhillips Co., 2024 ND 40, 4 N.W.3d 220 (natural-accumulation rule; concealed-danger exception)(courtlistener.com)