EnglishEspañol
Texas flag

Texas

Texas Pornography Laws (2026): Age Verification, FSC v. Paxton, and Penalties

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Texas Pornography Laws (2026): Age Verification, FSC v. Paxton, and Penalties

Updates

Corrected the status of Texas's pornography health-warning rule, which the Fifth Circuit held unconstitutional in 2024 rather than leaving on appeal, added the Fifth Circuit decision striking down Texas's sexual-device ban, and fixed the offense grades listed for promoting obscene material.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Sources and References

  1. Tex. Penal Code § 43.23 (obscenity)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
  2. Tex. Penal Code § 43.24 (harmful material to a minor) / § 43.26 (child pornography)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
  3. Tex. Penal Code § 21.16 (unlawful disclosure of intimate visual material) / § 21.08 (indecent exposure)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
  4. Tex. Local Government Code ch. 243 (municipal/county authority to regulate sexually oriented business)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
  5. Tex. Business & Commerce Code ch. 102 (sexually oriented business fee)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
  6. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, 606 U.S. ___ (2025), No. 23-1122(law.cornell.edu)
  7. Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)(law.cornell.edu)
  8. Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce App Store Accountability Act (SB 2420) pending Fifth Circuit appeal(scotusblog.com)
  9. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, No. 23-50627 (5th Cir. Mar. 7, 2024) (vacating the injunction as to age verification, affirming it as to the health warnings)(ca5.uscourts.gov)
  10. Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. Earle, 517 F.3d 738 (5th Cir. 2008), No. 06-51067 (Texas ban on promoting or selling sexual devices violates the Fourteenth Amendment)(ca5.uscourts.gov)
  11. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, 606 U.S. ___ (2025), No. 23-1122 (slip opinion)(supremecourt.gov)
Share: