District of Columbia
District of Columbia Identity Theft Laws: Statute, Penalties, and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

The District of Columbia's identity theft law, D.C. Code § 22-3227.02, splits the offense into two degrees based mainly on dollar value, and it gives victims an unusual additional right: a court petition to correct false information a thief created in DC's own public records. This article covers the DC statute, its penalty structure, the record-correction remedy, and how the federal identity theft framework applies to District residents.
This page addresses District of Columbia law specifically. For the federal reporting process, the FTC's free recovery tool, and the credit-freeze and fraud-alert rights available nationwide, see our identity theft laws hub and our guide to how to report identity theft.
DC's Identity Theft Statute: D.C. Code § 22-3227.02
A person commits identity theft in the District when they knowingly, and without the other person's consent, do one of three things with someone else's personal identifying information: use it to obtain or attempt to obtain property fraudulently, obtain or possess it with intent to use it fraudulently or let someone else use it fraudulently, or use it to identify themselves to a law enforcement officer in order to avoid arrest or detection, or to conceal a crime.
"Personal identifying information" is defined broadly under § 22-3227.01: name, address, phone number, date of birth, mother's maiden name, government identification numbers, financial account details, biometric data, and any other number or piece of information that could be used to access financial resources or medical information, or to obtain identification. "Property" incorporates DC's general theft-statute definition and expressly includes credit. "Financial injury" covers all monetary costs tied to the identity theft, including attorney's fees, credit-repair costs, and lost wages.
Penalties: First-Degree and Second-Degree Identity Theft
DC Code § 22-3227.03 sets penalties primarily by dollar amount. First-degree identity theft applies when the property obtained or attempted, or the financial injury caused, is $1,000 or more. It is punishable by a fine that is the greater of the amount set under the District's general criminal fine schedule at D.C. Code § 22-3571.01, which caps an individual's fine at $25,000 for an offense punishable by 10 years under § 22-3571.01(b)(7), twice the value of the property obtained, or twice the amount of the financial injury, imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both.

Second-degree identity theft applies in two situations. The first is any amount under $1,000, described in the statute as property or financial injury that "has some value." The second applies regardless of dollar value: identity theft that causes another person to be falsely accused of, or arrested for, a crime because someone misused their personal identifying information. Second-degree identity theft is punishable by a fine under the same criminal fine schedule, capped at $1,000 for an offense punishable by 180 days under § 22-3571.01(b)(4), or imprisonment for up to 180 days, or both.
Those ceilings are not the whole picture. Subsection (c) of § 22-3227.03, headed "Enhanced penalty," now reads only "Repealed." It was struck by D.C. Law 21-166, effective November 23, 2016, and the same act amended D.C. Code § 22-3601 to add identity theft to the offenses that carry the District's enhanced penalty for crimes against senior citizen victims. Under § 22-3601(a), an offense committed against a person who was 65 or older at the time may be punished by a fine of up to 1 1/2 times the maximum fine otherwise authorized and imprisonment for up to 1 1/2 times the maximum term otherwise authorized, which takes first-degree identity theft to 15 years. Section 22-3601(c) gives the accused an affirmative defense, established by a preponderance of the evidence, that they knew or reasonably believed the victim was not 65 or older, or could not have determined the victim's age because of the manner in which the offense was committed.
Restitution and Correcting DC Public Records
Under D.C. Code § 22-3227.04, a court may, in addition to any other penalty, order a convicted defendant to pay restitution for the full amount of the victim's financial injury. This restitution provision, added by the Identity Theft Amendment Act of 2003, is discretionary rather than mandatory.
DC also gives victims a distinct, non-monetary remedy that many states do not offer explicitly: correction of public records. Under D.C. Code § 22-3227.05(a), if a person is convicted, adjudicated delinquent, or found not guilty by reason of insanity of identity theft, the court may issue orders necessary to correct any District public record that contains false information resulting from the offense, and District agencies must comply with an order issued under that subsection within 30 days. Separately, subsection (b) lets any person who alleges they were victimized by identity theft, even without waiting for a conviction, petition the court for an expedited judicial determination that a DC public record contains false information from a violation of the identity theft statute. If the petitioner meets a clear-and-convincing-evidence standard, the court can order the correction, but the statute's 30-day agency-compliance deadline is textually tied to subsection (a) orders; it does not by its own terms extend to a subsection (b) civil-petition order.
DC's identity theft law also reaches conduct connected to the District even when the offender was never physically present here. Under § 22-3227.06, DC has extraterritorial jurisdiction over identity theft committed against a DC resident or DC-located victim, or where any part of the offense occurs in the District, which matters for online and out-of-state schemes that target DC residents.
Security Freeze for Minors: Rely on Federal Law
The District's general Consumer Security Freeze statute (D.C. Code §§ 28-3861 through 28-3864) does not include a minor or protected-consumer provision. It defines "consumer" simply as "an individual who resides in the District of Columbia," with no age qualifier and no separate process for a parent, guardian, or conservator to place a freeze for someone who does not yet have a credit file. DC residents therefore rely on the federal minors' and protected-consumers' freeze right under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1(j), added in 2018, rather than a District-specific statute.
Reporting Identity Theft in DC
The Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia lays out a four-step process for identity theft victims. First, file a police report with the Metropolitan Police Department's Financial and Cyber Crimes Unit, reachable at 202-727-4159 or online. Second, immediately call the security or fraud department of each affected financial institution, and follow up in writing by certified mail. Third, pull your free annual credit reports and review them for unfamiliar inquiries or accounts. Fourth, place fraud alerts or security freezes with the credit bureaus.

The OAG's consumer alert does not cite the identity theft statute by number and does not advertise a dedicated OAG identity-theft hotline separate from general consumer complaints, which go through 202-442-9828, consumer.protection@dc.gov, or an online complaint portal. That channel handles a business or seller that scammed or misled you, and our guide to D.C. scam and fraud laws explains what the OAG does with those complaints and when a consumer can sue a merchant. For the identity-theft hotline itself, the OAG points residents to the FTC's 1-877-ID-THEFT (438-4338) line and IdentityTheft.gov.
Federal Protections That Apply in DC
DC's state-law rights layer onto the federal identity theft framework available to every resident of every state. Under FCRA section 605B (15 U.S.C. § 1681c-2), a victim who submits an identity theft report can have a credit reporting agency block fraudulent information from their credit file. Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1, every consumer, including DC residents, has had the right to a free security freeze and to one-year or seven-year extended fraud alerts since a 2018 federal law made freezes free nationwide. IdentityTheft.gov provides a free FTC Identity Theft Report, a personalized recovery plan, and pre-filled dispute letters. For the full mechanics of freezes, fraud alerts, and the FTC reporting process, see our how to report identity theft and credit freeze vs. fraud alert guides.
Optional Monitoring on Top of a Free Freeze
Federal law makes a credit freeze at Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion free for every DC resident, and for most people it is the main step. If you have not been a victim but want ongoing alerts for your own identity, Aura offers three-bureau credit monitoring and alerts if your Social Security number appears on the dark web. Its plans also include identity theft insurance.
See What Aura MonitorsAffiliate disclosure: if you sign up through this link we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
2025-26 Currency
The most recent amendment to § 22-3227.03 on record is D.C. Law 21-166, effective November 23, 2016, and it was substantive rather than technical: it repealed the section's own enhanced-penalty subsection, and in the same act added identity theft to the list of offenses carrying the senior-victim enhancement in § 22-3601. The enhancement statute itself was amended more recently, by D.C. Law 25-175 effective June 8, 2024. No 2025-26 amendment to either section was found.

Information last verified on 2026-08-13, drawn directly from the DC Code and the Office of the Attorney General's consumer alert page. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer and is general legal information, not legal advice for your specific situation.
Related Resources
- Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
- How to Report Identity Theft
- Credit Freeze vs. Fraud Alert
Last updated: 2026-08-13.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for identity theft in Washington, DC?
It depends on the dollar amount. First-degree identity theft, for property or financial injury of $1,000 or more, carries up to 10 years in prison and a fine that is the greater of the § 22-3571.01 amount for a 10-year offense, $25,000 for an individual, twice the value of the property, or twice the financial injury. Second-degree identity theft, for smaller amounts, or for causing someone to be falsely accused of or arrested for a crime regardless of amount, carries up to 180 days and a fine of up to $1,000. Under D.C. Code § 22-3601, those maximums rise to 1 1/2 times the otherwise authorized fine and prison term when the victim was 65 or older, so first-degree exposure becomes 15 years.
Can identity theft in DC be charged even if no money was stolen?
Yes. Second-degree identity theft applies when someone else's personal identifying information is used to falsely accuse or get a person arrested for a crime, regardless of any dollar amount involved.
Is restitution mandatory for identity theft victims in DC?
No. Under D.C. Code section 22-3227.04, a court may order restitution for the victim's full financial injury, but the statute makes this discretionary rather than a required part of every sentence.
Can I get false information removed from DC public records after identity theft?
Yes. Under D.C. Code section 22-3227.05, a court can order the correction of a DC public record containing false information caused by identity theft, either as part of a conviction, adjudication, or not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity finding under subsection (a), or through a separate civil petition any alleged victim can file under subsection (b), decided on clear and convincing evidence. The statute's 30-day agency-compliance deadline is textually tied to subsection (a) orders only.
Does DC have a minor credit freeze law?
DC does not have its own minor or protected-consumer security freeze statute. Families in the District rely on the federal minors' freeze right under 15 U.S.C. section 1681c-1(j), which lets a parent or guardian place a free freeze for a child or protected person nationwide.
Where do I report identity theft in DC?
File a police report with the Metropolitan Police Department's Financial and Cyber Crimes Unit at 202-727-4159, contact your financial institutions directly, place fraud alerts or freezes with the credit bureaus, and file a report with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov or 1-877-438-4338.
Updates
Corrected the penalties section: the repealed subsection of the identity theft penalty statute was the enhanced penalty for senior-citizen victims, not a repeat-offender clause, and that enhancement now lives in D.C. Code § 22-3601, which raises first-degree exposure to 15 years when the victim was 65 or older; also corrected the fine schedule, which is the District’s general criminal fine table rather than an organizational one.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of the District of Columbia, Title 22: Criminal Offenses and Penalties. - Chapter 32: Theft; Fraud; Stolen Property; Forgery; and Extortion. - Subchapter III-C: Identity Theft.
§ 22-3227.02Identity theft.In force
A person commits the offense of identity theft if that person knowingly: (1) Uses personal identifying information belonging to or pertaining to another person to obtain, or attempt to obtain, property fraudulently and without that person’s consent; (2) Obtains, creates, or possesses personal identifying information belonging to or pertaining to another person with the intent to: (A) Use the information to obtain, or attempt to obtain, property fraudulently and without that person’s consent; or (B) Give, sell, transmit, or transfer the information to a third person to facilitate the use of the information by that third person to obtain, or attempt to obtain, property fraudulently and without that person’s consent; or (3) Uses personal identifying information belonging to or pertaining to another person, without that person’s consent, to: (A) Identify himself or herself at the time of his or her arrest; (B) Facilitate or conceal his or her commission of a crime; or (C) Avoid detection, apprehension, or prosecution for a crime.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
§ 22-3227.03Penalties for identity theft.In force
(a) Any person convicted of identity theft shall be fined not more than (1) the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, (2) twice the value of the property obtained or (3) twice the amount of the financial injury, whichever is greatest, or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both, if the property obtained, or attempted to be obtained, or the amount of the financial injury is $1,000 or more. (b) Any person convicted of identity theft shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or imprisoned for not more than 180 days, or both, if the property obtained, or attempted to be obtained, or the amount of the financial injury, has some value, or if another person is falsely accused of, or arrested for, committing a crime because of the use, without permission, of that person’s personal identifying information. (c) Repealed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
§ 22-3227.05Correction of public records.In force
(a) When a person is convicted, adjudicated delinquent, or found not guilty by reason of insanity of identity theft, the court may issue such orders as are necessary to correct any District of Columbia public record that contains false information as a result of a violation of this subchapter. (b) In all other cases, a person who alleges that he or she is a victim of identity theft may petition the court for an expedited judicial determination that a District of Columbia public record contains false information as a result of a violation of this subchapter. Upon a finding of clear and convincing evidence that the person was a victim of identity theft, the court may issue such orders as are necessary to correct any District of Columbia public record that contains false information as a result of a violation of this subchapter. (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, District of Columbia agencies shall comply with orders issued under subsection (a) of this section within 30 days of issuance of the order.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
§ 22-3227.04Restitution.In force
When a person is convicted of identity theft, the court may, in addition to any other applicable penalty, order restitution for the full amount of financial injury.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
§ 22-3227.06Jurisdiction.In force
The offense of identity theft shall be deemed to be committed in the District of Columbia, regardless of whether the offender is physically present in the District of Columbia, if: (1) The person whose personal identifying information is improperly obtained, created, possessed, or used is a resident of, or located in, the District of Columbia; or (2) Any part of the offense takes place in the District of Columbia.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
§ 22-3227.01Definitions.In force
For the purposes of this subchapter, the term: (1) “Financial injury” means all monetary costs, debts, or obligations incurred by a person as a result of another person obtaining, creating, possessing, or using that person’s personal identifying information in violation of this subchapter, including, but not limited to: (A) The costs of clearing the person’s credit rating, credit history, criminal record, or any other official record, including attorney fees; (B) The expenses related to any civil or administrative proceeding to satisfy or contest a debt, lien, judgment, or other obligation of the person that arose as a result of the violation of this subchapter, including attorney fees; (C) The costs of repairing or replacing damaged or stolen property; (D) Lost time or wages, or any similar monetary benefit forgone while the person is seeking redress for damages resulting from a violation of this subchapter; and (E) Lost time, wages, and benefits, other losses sustained, legal fees, and other expenses incurred as a result of the use, without permission, of one’s personal identifying information by another as prohibited by § 22-3227.02. (2) Repealed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Toure v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2025)“…23(b)(1), (d)(2); and • First-degree identity theft, D.C. Code §§ 22-3227.01, -3227.02(2)(A), -3227.03(a).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of the District of Columbia, Title 28: Commercial Instruments and Transactions. - Chapter 38: Consumer Protections. - Subchapter III: Consumer Security Freeze.
§ 28-3861Definitions.In force
For the purposes of this subchapter, the term: (1) “Consumer” means an individual who resides in the District of Columbia. (2) "Credit report" means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a credit reporting agency bearing on a consumer's creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living, which is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumer's eligibility for: (A) Credit or insurance to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes; (B) Employment purposes; or (C) Any other purpose authorized under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, approved October 26, 1970 (84 Stat. 1127; 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.). (3) “Credit reporting agency” means any person who, for consideration, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages in whole or in part in the practice of maintaining consumers’ credit information for the purpose of furnishing the information to third parties. (4) “Proper identification” means information generally considered sufficient to identify a person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
Code of the District of Columbia, Title 22: Criminal Offenses and Penalties. - Chapter 35B: Fines for Criminal Offenses.
§ 22-3571.01Fines for criminal offenses.In forcecited in 15 of our articles
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, and except as provided in § 22-3571.02, a defendant who has been found guilty of an offense under the District of Columbia Official Code punishable by imprisonment may be sentenced to pay a fine as provided in this section. (b) An individual who has been found guilty of such an offense may be fined not more than the greatest of: (1) $100 if the offense is punishable by imprisonment for 10 days or less; (2) $250 if the offense is punishable by imprisonment for 30 days, or one month, or less but more than 10 days; (3) $500 if the offense is punishable by imprisonment for 90 days, or 3 months, or less but more than 30 days; (4) $1,000 if the offense is punishable by imprisonment for 180 days, or 6 months, or less but more than 90 days; (5) $2,500 if the offense is punishable by imprisonment for one year or less but more than 180 days; (6) $12,500 if the offense is punishable by imprisonment for 5 years or less but more than one year; (7) $25,000 if the offense is punishable by imprisonment for 10 years or less but more than 5 years; (8) $37,500 if the offense is punishable by imprisonment for 15 years or less but more than…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gilberto Lopez-Ramirez v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2017, 171 A.3d 169)“…dardized the maximum fine for 180-day crimes at 31,000. See D.C. Code § 22-3571.01 ibi (2012 Repi. a supp. 2014); 60 D.C.R…”
- Mario Giovani Valendzuela-Castillo v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2018, 180 A.3d 74)“…eamlining Act set maximum fines for misdemeanors at $1000); D.C. Code § 22-3571.01 (2013 Repl.) (standardizing $1000 as th…”
- Tornero v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2025)“…onment may be sentenced to pay a fine as provided” therein. D.C. Code § 22-3571.01(a). The provision also enumerates the s…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: District of Columbia Audio Recording Laws: Complete Legal Guide, District of Columbia Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Interstate Calls, District of Columbia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
Code of the District of Columbia, Title 22: Criminal Offenses and Penalties. - Chapter 36: Enhanced Crimes Committed Against Certain Persons.
§ 22-3601Enhanced penalty for crimes against senior citizen victims.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Any person who commits any offense listed in subsection (b) of this section against an individual who is 65 years of age or older, at the time of the offense, may be punished by a fine of up to 1 1/2 times the maximum fine otherwise authorized for the offense and may be imprisoned for a term of up to 1 1/2 times the maximum term of imprisonment otherwise authorized for the offense, or both. (b) The provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall apply to the following offenses: any crime of violence, as that term is defined in § 23-1331(4), theft, fraud in the first degree, and fraud in the second degree, identity theft, financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult or elderly person, or an attempt or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing offenses. (c) It is an affirmative defense that the accused knew or reasonably believed the victim was not 65 years old or older at the time of the offense, or could not have known or determined the age of the victim because of the manner in which the offense was committed. This defense shall be established by a preponderance of the evidence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Covington (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 1983, 459 A.2d 1067)“…sion of implements of crime, i.e., narcotics paraphernalia, D.C.Code § 22-3601 (1981), 1 and reckless dri…”
- Gorham v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 1975, 339 A.2d 401)“…s of crime, to wit, narcotic paraphernalia, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3601 (1967); and possession of a dangerous d…”
- Jalonte Little v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2015, 125 A.3d 1119)“…deny being involved in any robbery, the 4 D.C. Code § 22-3601 (2012 Repl.) provides an enhanced penal…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: D.C. Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- D.C. Code § 22-3227.02, Identity Theft (elements of the offense)(code.dccouncil.gov).gov
- D.C. Code § 22-3227.03, Penalties for Identity Theft(code.dccouncil.gov).gov
- D.C. Code § 22-3227.04, Restitution, and § 22-3227.05, Correction of Public Records(code.dccouncil.gov).gov
- Consumer Alert: Identity Theft (Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia)(oag.dc.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1, Identity Theft Prevention; Fraud Alerts and Active Duty Alerts (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- IdentityTheft.gov (Federal Trade Commission)(identitytheft.gov).gov
- D.C. Code § 22-3601, Enhanced Penalty for Crimes Against Senior Citizen Victims(code.dccouncil.gov)
- D.C. Code § 22-3571.01, Fines for Criminal Offenses(code.dccouncil.gov)