Alaska
Alaska Identity Theft Laws: Criminal Impersonation and Your Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Unlike most states, Alaska has no criminal statute literally titled identity theft. Victims work through a two-track framework instead. The state's Department of Law directs them to AS 45.48, the Personal Information Protection Act, which provides a security freeze and a court declaration of factual innocence. The criminal charge itself sits elsewhere in the code, at AS 11.46.565, Criminal Impersonation in the First Degree, which is the offense Alaska prosecutors use for identity-theft-type conduct.
This page walks through both tracks, the police-report right built into AS 45.48, and the federal recovery rights every identity theft victim has regardless of state. For the broader picture, see our identity theft laws hub and our guide to reporting identity theft.
Why Alaska Has No Statute Called "Identity Theft"
Alaska's Department of Law page on identity theft describes the Personal Information Protection Act as the mechanism that "allows you to place a security freeze on your credit report, and allows you to petition the court for a declaration of factual innocence after identity theft," and it points readers to AS 45.48. That page names no criminal statute at all, which is itself telling: there is no Title 11 section called identity theft to point to.
The criminal side has to be located in the code directly, and it lives in Alaska's impersonation statutes, AS 11.46.565 and AS 11.46.570, discussed next. That pairing is our reading of the statutes rather than the Department of Law's framing. It is a real structural difference from most states, not a labeling quirk, so a search for "Alaska identity theft statute" by section number alone will not turn up the right law.
The Criminal Charge: Criminal Impersonation in the First Degree
Alaska's operative criminal charge for identity-theft-type conduct is AS 11.46.565, Criminal Impersonation in the First Degree. Under subsection (a), a person commits the offense if the person possesses an access device or identification document of another person; without authorization of the other person, uses that access device or identification document to obtain a false identification document, open an account at a financial institution, obtain an access device, or obtain property or services; and recklessly damages the financial reputation of the other person. All three elements have to be present, which is why a bare misuse of someone's card number does not automatically fit this section.
Under subsection (b), criminal impersonation in the first degree is a class B felony.
The lesser offense, AS 11.46.570, Criminal Impersonation in the Second Degree, reaches different conduct: assuming a false identity and acting in the assumed character, or pretending to be a representative of some person or organization and acting in the pretended capacity, in either case with intent to defraud, commit a crime, or obtain a benefit the person is not entitled to. Under its subsection (b), that offense is a class A misdemeanor. A licensed Alaska attorney can explain the sentencing exposure that attaches to either class in a specific case.

Security Freeze and the Declaration of Factual Innocence
AS 45.48, the Personal Information Protection Act, carries the two rights that matter most after identity theft. The first is at AS 45.48.100: a consumer may prohibit a consumer credit reporting agency from releasing the consumer's credit report or credit score without the consumer's express authorization, by placing a security freeze on the report. That is what stops a lender from pulling your file to open new credit in your name.
The second is at AS 45.48.600. A victim of identity theft may petition the superior court for a determination that the victim is factually innocent of a crime where the perpetrator of the identity theft was arrested for, cited for, or convicted of that crime using the victim's identity, a criminal complaint was filed against the perpetrator, and the victim's identity was mistakenly associated with a record of a conviction. The statute also lets the department petition for that determination, or the superior court make it on its own motion. A court finding of factual innocence gives you an official record you can use to counter any confusion between you and the person who misused your identity.
Filing a Police Report
AS 45.48.680 gives identity theft victims a police-report right that does not depend on where the theft happened. If you have learned or reasonably suspect you are an identity theft victim and you contact a local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over your actual place of residence in order to file a complaint, that agency must make a report of the matter and provide you with a copy of it, even if it has no jurisdiction over the theft of your identity. It may refer the matter to a law enforcement agency in a different jurisdiction.
The statute is careful about what that report obligates the agency to do. Subsection (b) says the section is not intended to interfere with an agency's discretion to allocate its resources to investigating crime, and that the agency is not required to count the complaint as an open case for purposes such as compiling open-case statistics. So the report is a document you are entitled to, which is what creditors and bureaus ask for, and not a guarantee of an investigation.
Credit Freezes for Minors in Alaska
Alaska has its own minor freeze provision, separate from the general freeze right. AS 45.48.220 lets a parent, legal guardian, or conservator make a security freeze request under AS 45.48.100 through 45.48.290 on behalf of a consumer who is a minor, an incapacitated person, or a protected person under that person's supervision. It also closes the gap that normally blocks a child freeze: if a consumer credit report does not exist at the time of the request, the consumer credit reporting agency shall generate a consumer credit report for the purpose of placing the security freeze. The statute defines a minor as a child under 18 years of age who has not had the disabilities of a minor removed as described in AS 09.55.590.
Federal law gives Alaska families the same right at all three nationwide bureaus, so you can use whichever route is easier. 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1(j) requires all three to let a parent or guardian freeze a child's credit file for free, including before the child has a credit file at all. See our credit freeze vs. fraud alert page for how the freeze right works generally.

Restitution and Civil Remedies
Alaska's general restitution framework is AS 12.55.045. When presented with credible evidence, and unless the victim or other person expressly declines restitution, the court shall order a defendant convicted of an offense to make restitution, including to the victim or other person injured by the offense. The statute tells the court to weigh the public policy that favors requiring criminals to compensate for damages and injury, including loss of income, and bars it from considering the defendant's ability to pay when setting the amount. An order of restitution does not limit any civil liability the defendant has for the same conduct.
On the civil side, AS 45.48.200 creates a private action, though its reach is specific: it covers violations of AS 45.48.100 through 45.48.290, the security freeze provisions, rather than identity theft at large. A consumer who suffers damages from a negligent violation may recover actual economic damages, court costs allowed by the rules of court, and full reasonable attorney fees. For a knowing violation, the consumer may also recover punitive damages of not less than $100 and not more than $5,000 for each violation as the court determines to be appropriate, plus other relief the court finds appropriate. Injunctive relief stands on its own: a consumer may sue over a violation or a threatened violation whether or not another remedy is sought.
Breach notification failures have their own route. Under AS 45.48.080(b), an information collector that is not a governmental agency and violates the breach notification provisions at AS 45.48.010 through 45.48.090 commits an unfair or deceptive act or practice under AS 45.50.471 through 45.50.561, with damages under those sections limited to actual economic damages. Subsection (a) handles governmental agencies through civil penalties payable to the state instead.
The AS 45.48.600 factual innocence petition remains a record-clearing remedy rather than a damages action. For a general tort claim against whoever misused your identity, ask a licensed Alaska attorney what applies to your facts.
Reporting to the Alaska Department of Law
The Alaska Department of Law's Consumer Protection Unit is the state's identity theft resource. Reach it at 907-269-5200 in Anchorage, 1-888-576-2529 statewide toll-free, or by email at consumerprotection@alaska.gov, and use the "File a Complaint" link on its identity theft page. The unit also lists federal backstops, including the FTC Consumer Helpline at 877-382-4357, reportfraud.ftc.gov, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service at 1-877-876-2455, for identity theft involving mail fraud.
Federal Rights That Apply in Every State
On top of Alaska's own two-track framework, every identity theft victim also has federal rights that do not depend on state law. IdentityTheft.gov, run by the FTC, is a free national recovery site that builds a personal recovery plan once you describe what happened. Once you have an FTC Identity Theft Report, 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-2 (FCRA § 605B) requires a credit bureau to block fraudulent information from your report within 4 business days of receiving your documentation. Federal law has also made both credit freezes and fraud alerts free at all three bureaus since 2018, under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1. See our guides to reporting identity theft and credit freeze vs. fraud alert for the full mechanics of both.

No 2025-26 amendment to AS 45.48, AS 11.46.565, or the Department of Law's identity theft program surfaced during this page's research, though Alaska's own legislative bill-tracking tools could not be checked directly this session, so treat this as a partial check rather than an exhaustive one.
What a Freeze Does Not Tell You
Federal law makes a credit freeze at Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion free, and it is the first step. A freeze keeps a lender from pulling your file, but it does not tell you when your Social Security number turns up on the dark web. Aura sends dark-web alerts for your Social Security number alongside three-bureau credit monitoring, and it can remove your personal information from data broker and people-search sites, which you can also request from each site yourself for free.
See What Aura MonitorsAffiliate disclosure: if you sign up through this link we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Information last verified on 2026-09-01. The statutory text of AS 11.46.565, AS 11.46.570, AS 12.55.045, AS 45.48.080, AS 45.48.100, AS 45.48.200, AS 45.48.220, AS 45.48.600, and AS 45.48.680 was checked against the Alaska Statutes as published by the Alaska State Legislature; the Alaska Department of Law's identity theft page and federal law under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681c-1 and 1681c-2 supply the rest. Statutes change, so confirm current language with the Department of Law or a licensed Alaska attorney before relying on this page for a specific legal question. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
- Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
- How to Report Identity Theft
- Credit Freeze vs. Fraud Alert
Last updated: 2026-09-01.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Alaska have an identity theft statute?
Not one titled that way. Alaska uses a two-track framework instead: AS 45.48, the Personal Information Protection Act, provides a security freeze and a court declaration of factual innocence, while AS 11.46.565, Criminal Impersonation in the First Degree, is the criminal charge actually used for identity-theft-type conduct.
What is Alaska's penalty for criminal impersonation?
AS 11.46.565, Criminal Impersonation in the First Degree, is a class B felony under subsection (b) of that statute. The lesser offense, AS 11.46.570, Criminal Impersonation in the Second Degree, is a class A misdemeanor under its subsection (b). A licensed Alaska attorney can explain the sentencing exposure those classes carry in a specific case.
How do I get a declaration of factual innocence in Alaska?
Under AS 45.48.600, an identity theft victim may petition the superior court for a determination of factual innocence where the perpetrator was arrested for, cited for, or convicted of a crime using the victim's identity, a criminal complaint was filed against the perpetrator, and the victim's identity was mistakenly associated with a record of a conviction. The department may also petition, and the court may make the determination on its own motion. Contact the Alaska Department of Law's Consumer Protection Unit for guidance on the process.
Can I file a police report for identity theft in Alaska even if my local police lack jurisdiction?
Yes. AS 45.48.680 requires a local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over your actual place of residence to make a report and give you a copy when you contact it to file an identity theft complaint, even if it has no jurisdiction over the theft itself, and it may refer the matter to the agency that does. Subsection (b) adds that the report does not override the agency's discretion over how it allocates investigative resources.
Can I freeze my child's credit for free in Alaska?
Yes, under both state and federal law. AS 45.48.220 lets a parent, legal guardian, or conservator request a security freeze for a minor, incapacitated person, or protected person, and requires the credit reporting agency to generate a credit report first if none exists. 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1(j) separately requires all three nationwide bureaus to let a parent or guardian freeze a minor's file for free.
Can I sue over identity theft in Alaska?
It depends on who you are suing and for what. AS 45.48.200 gives a consumer a private action for violations of the security freeze provisions at AS 45.48.100 through 45.48.290, with actual economic damages, court costs, and full reasonable attorney fees for a negligent violation, and punitive damages of $100 to $5,000 per violation for a knowing one. AS 45.48.080(b) makes a non-governmental breach notification failure an unfair or deceptive act or practice. Separately, AS 12.55.045 directs restitution from a defendant convicted in a criminal case. For a general tort claim against the person who misused your identity, ask a licensed Alaska attorney.
Who do I contact to report identity theft in Alaska?
The Alaska Department of Law's Consumer Protection Unit, at 907-269-5200 (Anchorage), 1-888-576-2529 (statewide toll-free), or consumerprotection@alaska.gov. Also file a free FTC Identity Theft Report at IdentityTheft.gov for the additional federal rights it unlocks.
Updates
Rewrote this page from the text of the Alaska Statutes: AS 11.46.565 is stated flatly as a class B felony, and the page now covers Alaska’s own minor credit freeze right (AS 45.48.220), the private action and attorney-fee provisions for security freeze violations (AS 45.48.200), the breach notice remedy (AS 45.48.080), and the state restitution framework (AS 12.55.045), all of which an earlier draft had wrongly reported as unconfirmed or nonexistent.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Alaska Statutes, Title 11. Criminal Law, Chapter 46. Offenses Against Property
§ 11.46.565Criminal impersonation in the first degreeIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A person commits the crime of criminal impersonation in the first degree if the person (1) possesses an access device or identification document of another person; (2) without authorization of the other person, uses the access device or identification document of another person to obtain a false identification document, open an account at a financial institution, obtain an access device, or obtain property or services; and (3) recklessly damages the financial reputation of the other person. (b) Criminal impersonation in the first degree is a class B felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2015
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Phillips v. State (Court of Appeals of Alaska 2009, 211 P.3d 1148)“…4 . Counts 4, 7, 10, and 14 were charged under AS 11.46.565. 5 . AS 11.46.565.…”
- Kankanton v. State (Court of Appeals of Alaska 2015, 342 P.3d 840)“…14 See ch. 65, § 6, SLA 2000 (enacting AS 11.46.565). 15 AS 11.81.900(b)…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
§ 11.46.570Criminal impersonation in the second degreeIn force
(a) A person commits the crime of criminal impersonation in the second degree if the person (1) assumes a false identity and does an act in the assumed character with intent to defraud, commit a crime, or obtain a benefit to which the person is not entitled; or (2) pretends to be a representative of some person or organization and does an act in the pretended capacity with intent to defraud, commit a crime, or obtain a benefit to which the person is not entitled. (b) Criminal impersonation in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1994
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Roath v. State (Alaska Supreme Court 1994, 879 P.2d 1008)“…ere of two counts of criminal impersonation in violation of AS 11.46.570(a)(1) or (2), a class A misdemeanor. Ro…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Alaska Statutes, Title 45. Trade and Commerce, Chapter 48. Personal Information Protection Act
§ 45.48.680Right to file police report regarding identity theftIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Even if the local law enforcement agency does not have jurisdiction over the theft of an individual's identity, if an individual who has learned or reasonably suspects the individual has been the victim of identity theft contacts, for the purpose of filing a complaint, a local law enforcement agency that has jurisdiction over the individual's actual place of residence, the local law enforcement agency shall make a report of the matter and provide the individual with a copy of the report. The local law enforcement agency may refer the matter to a law enforcement agency in a different jurisdiction. (b) This section is not intended to interfere with the discretion of a local law enforcement agency to allocate its resources to the investigation of crime. A local law enforcement agency is not required to count a complaint filed under (a) of this section as an open case for purposes that include compiling statistics on its open cases.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Also relied on in: Alaska Data Privacy Laws: Constitutional Privacy & Breach Rules (2026)
§ 45.48.290DefinitionsIn force
In AS 45.48.100 45.48.290, (1) account review means activities related to account maintenance, account monitoring, credit line increases, and account upgrades and enhancements; (2) consumer means an individual who is the subject of a credit report or credit score; (3) consumer credit reporting agency has the meaning given in AS 45.48.990, but does not include a person who issues reports (A) on incidents of fraud or authorizations for the purpose of approving or processing negotiable instruments, electronic funds transfers, or similar methods of payments; or (B) regarding account closures because of fraud, substantial overdrafts, automated teller machine abuse, or similar negative information regarding a consumer to inquiring banks or other financial institutions for use only in reviewing consumer requests for deposit accounts at the inquiring banks or financial institutions; (4) reseller of consumer information means a person who assembles and merges information contained in the databases of consumer credit reporting agencies and does not maintain a permanent database of consumer information from which new consumer credit reports are produced; (5) security freeze means a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
§ 45.48.010Disclosure of breach of securityIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) If a covered person owns or licenses personal information in any form that includes personal information on a state resident, and a breach of the security of the information system that contains personal information occurs, the covered person shall, after discovering or being notified of the breach, disclose the breach to each state resident whose personal information was subject to the breach. (b) An information collector shall make the disclosure required by (a) of this section in the most expeditious time possible and without unreasonable delay, except as provided in AS 45.48.020 and as necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable integrity of the information system. (c) Notwithstanding (a) of this section, disclosure is not required if, after an appropriate investigation and after written notification to the attorney general of this state, the covered person determines that there is not a reasonable likelihood that harm to the consumers whose personal information has been acquired has resulted or will result from the breach. The determination shall be documented in writing, and the documentation shall be maintained for five years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2016
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Doe (Alaska Supreme Court 2016, 378 P.3d 704)“…tion would be limited to personal information as defined in AS 45.48.010-.995 (Personal Information Protection A…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026), Alaska Biometric Privacy Laws: Collection, Consent & Penalties (2026)
§ 45.48.080ViolationsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) If an information collector who is a governmental agency violates AS 45.48.010 45.48.090 with regard to the personal information of a state resident, the information collector (1) is liable to the state for a civil penalty of up to $500 for each state resident who was not notified under AS 45.48.010 45.48.090, but the total civil penalty may not exceed $50,000; and (2) may be enjoined from further violations. (b) If an information collector who is not a governmental agency violates AS 45.48.010 45.48.090 with regard to the personal information of a state resident, the violation is an unfair or deceptive act or practice under AS 45.50.471 45.50.561. However, (1) the information collector is not subject to the civil penalties imposed under AS 45.50.551 but is liable to the state for a civil penalty of up to $500 for each state resident who was not notified under AS 45.48.010 45.48.090, except that the total civil penalty may not exceed $50,000; and (2) damages that may be awarded against the information collector under (A) AS 45.50.531 are limited to actual economic damages that do not exceed $500; and (B) AS 45.50.537 are limited to actual economic damages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
§ 45.48.100Security freeze authorizedIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A consumer may prohibit a consumer credit reporting agency from releasing the consumer's credit report or credit score without the express authorization of the consumer by placing a security freeze on the consumer's credit report.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
§ 45.48.200Violations and penaltiesIn force
(a) A consumer who suffers damages as a result of a person's violation of AS 45.48.100 45.48.290 may bring an action in court against the person and recover, in the case of a violation where the person acted (1) negligently, actual economic damages, court costs allowed by the rules of court, and full reasonable attorney fees; (2) knowingly, (A) damages as described in (1) of this subsection; (B) punitive damages that are not less than $100 or more than $5,000 for each violation as the court determines to be appropriate; and (C) other relief that the court determines to be appropriate. (b) A consumer may bring an action in court against a person for a violation or threatened violation of AS 45.48.100 45.48.290 for injunctive relief, whether or not the consumer seeks another remedy under this section. (c) Notwithstanding (a)(2) of this section, a person who knowingly violates AS 45.48.100 45.48.290 is liable in a class action for an amount that the court allows.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
§ 45.48.220Request by parent or legal guardianIn force
A parent, legal guardian, or conservator of a minor, incapacitated person, or protected person may make a request under AS 45.48.100 45.48.290 on behalf of a consumer who is the minor, incapacitated person, or protected person under the supervision of that parent, legal guardian, or conservator. If a consumer credit report does not exist at the time of a request under this section, the consumer credit reporting agency shall generate a consumer credit report for the purpose of placing a security freeze. In this section, (1) conservator means a person appointed or qualified by a court to manage the property of an individual or a person legally authorized to perform substantially the same functions; (2) incapacitated person has the meaning given in AS 47.24.900; (3) minor means a child under 18 years of age who has not had the disabilities of a minor removed as described in AS 09.55.590; (4) protected person has the meaning given in AS 13.27.490.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
§ 45.48.600Factual declaration of innocence after identity theftIn force
(a) A victim of identity theft may petition the superior court for a determination that the victim is factually innocent of a crime if (1) the perpetrator of the identity theft was arrested for, cited for, or convicted of the crime using the victim's identity; (2) a criminal complaint was filed against the perpetrator of the identity theft; and (3) the victim's identity was mistakenly associated with a record of a conviction for a crime. (b) In addition to a petition by a victim under (a) of this section, the department may petition the superior court for a determination under (a) of this section, or the superior court may, on its own motion, make a determination under (a) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Alaska Statutes, Title 9. Code of Civil Procedure, Chapter 55. Special Actions and Proceedings
§ 09.55.590Removal of disabilities of minorityIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) A minor who is a resident of this state and is at least 16 years of age, who is living separate and apart from the parents or guardian of the minor, capable of sustained self-support and of managing one's own financial affairs, or the legal custodian of such a minor, may petition the superior court to have the disabilities of minority removed for limited or general purposes. (b) A minor or the legal custodian of a minor may institute a petition under this section in the name of the minor. (c) The petition for removal of disabilities of minority must state (1) the name, age, and residence address of the minor; (2) the name and address of each living parent; (3) the name and address of the guardian of the person and the guardian of the estate, if any; (4) the reasons why removal would be in the best interest of the minor; and (5) the purposes for which removal is sought. (d) The person who institutes a petition under this section must obtain the consent of each living parent or guardian having control of the person or property of the minor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2016
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska (Alaska Supreme Court 2007, 171 P.3d 577)“…"unemancipated" than Alaska's formal emancipation statute, AS 09.55.590. The term is defined in AS 18.16.090(2)…”
- Treacy v. Municipality of Anchorage (Alaska Supreme Court 2004, 91 P.3d 252)“…had the disabilities of minority removed in accordance with AS 09.55.590. 70 These exemptions are r…”
- Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. State (Alaska Supreme Court 2016, 375 P.3d 1122)“…unmarried, unemancipated wom[e]n under 18 years of age”); AS 09.55.590 (establishing judicial process by which…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Emancipation Laws: How to Get Emancipated in Alaska (2026), Alaska Child Support Laws (2026): Guidelines & Calculator
Alaska Statutes, Title 12. Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 55. Sentencing and Probation
§ 12.55.045Restitution and compensationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) The court shall, when presented with credible evidence, unless the victim or other person expressly declines restitution, order a defendant convicted of an offense to make restitution as provided in this section, including restitution to the victim or other person injured by the offense, to a public, private, or private nonprofit organization that has provided or is or will be providing counseling, medical, or shelter services to the victim or other person injured by the offense, or as otherwise authorized by law. The court shall, when presented with credible evidence, unless the victim expressly declines restitution, also order a defendant convicted of an offense to compensate a victim that is a nonprofit organization for the value of labor or goods provided by volunteers if the labor or goods were necessary to alleviate or mitigate the effects of the defendant's crime.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Brezenoff v. State (Court of Appeals of Alaska 1983, 658 P.2d 1359)“…ot make the inquiry into her ability to pay, as required by AS 12.55.045(a), before determining the amount of re…”
- Karr v. State (Alaska Supreme Court 1984, 686 P.2d 1192)“…d contends that the restitution was imposed in violation of AS 12.55.045(a) because the judge did not consider h…”
- Lonis v. State (Court of Appeals of Alaska 2000, 998 P.2d 441)“…hority to order restitution to the victim’s insurer. AS 12.55.045(a) provides that a “court may order a d…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Expungement Laws: What You Can (and Cannot) Do With Your Criminal Record
Alaska Statutes, Title 45. Trade and Commerce, Chapter 50. Competitive Practices, Regulation of Competition, Consumer Protection
§ 45.50.471Unlawful acts and practicesIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce are declared to be unlawful. (b) The terms unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices include the following acts: (1) fraudulently conveying or transferring goods or services by representing them to be those of another; (2) falsely representing or designating the geographic origin of goods or services; (3) causing a likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship, or approval, or another person's affiliation, connection, or association with or certification of goods or services; (4) representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or quantities that they do not have or that a person has a sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or connection that the person does not have; (5) representing that goods are original or new if they are deteriorated, altered, reconditioned, reclaimed, used, secondhand, or seconds; (6) representing that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality, or grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model, if they…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 102 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. (Alaska Supreme Court 1980, 609 P.2d 520)“…Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, AS 45.50.471-561 (the Alaska Act) stands as a sentin…”
- Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. State (Alaska Supreme Court 1980, 620 P.2d 182)“…Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (AS 45.50.471 et seq.) and the Alaska Restraint of Tr…”
- State v. First National Bank of Anchorage (Alaska Supreme Court 1982, 660 P.2d 406)“…Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, AS 45.50.471-45.50.561. Brown filed his answer and l…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Alaska Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
United States Code Title 18
§ 1028Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and informationIn forcecited in 22 of our articles
Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this section— knowingly and without lawful authority produces an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document; knowingly transfers an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without lawful authority; knowingly possesses with intent to use unlawfully or transfer unlawfully five or more identification documents (other than those issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication features, or false identification documents; knowingly possesses an identification document (other than one issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication feature, or a false identification document, with the intent such document or feature be used to defraud the United States; knowingly produces, transfers, or possesses a document-making implement or authentication feature with the intent such document-making implement or authentication feature will be used in the production of a false identification document or another document-making implement or authentication feature which will…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,360 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Christensen (2016) affirmed Section 1028(a)(7) identity-theft convictions after the CFAA predicates were set aside, holding intent to violate California Penal Code 502 was a valid alternative predicate. United States v. Campa (2008) upheld a 1028(a)(3) conviction on constructive possession of counterfeit documents.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Flores-Figueroa v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2009, 556 U.S. 646)“…tion documents, authentica tion features, and information.” 18 U. S. C. §1028. The title of another provision (the pro…”
- United States v. George Lloyd Pregent (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 1999, 190 F.3d 279)“…zed United States identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1028 (a)(1) (West Supp.1999), knowingly prod…”
- United States v. Lesmarge Valnor (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2006, 451 F.3d 744)✓Valnor charged $400 to $500 a head to have a Florida DMV examiner issue fraudulent driver's licenses; the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a sentence above the advisory range for his Section 1028(f) conspiracy, noting it fell far below Section 1028(b)(1)(A)'s 15-year maximum.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Indiana Identity Theft Laws, Phishing, Smishing and Vishing: Spot Them and What to Do If You Clicked, Alabama Identity Theft Laws: Statute, Reporting, and Your Rights
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Alaska Department of Law, Consumer Protection Unit, Identity Theft(law.alaska.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 1028, Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Identification Documents (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1, Identity Theft Prevention; Fraud Alerts and Active Duty Alerts (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-2, Block of Information Resulting From Identity Theft (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- IdentityTheft.gov (Federal Trade Commission)(identitytheft.gov).gov
- AS 11.46.565, Criminal Impersonation in the First Degree (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)
- AS 11.46.570, Criminal Impersonation in the Second Degree (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)
- AS 45.48.100, Security Freeze Authorized (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)
- AS 45.48.200, Violations and Penalties (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)
- AS 45.48.220, Request by Parent or Legal Guardian (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)
- AS 45.48.600, Factual Declaration of Innocence After Identity Theft (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)
- AS 45.48.680, Right to File Police Report Regarding Identity Theft (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)
- AS 45.48.080, Violations (Alaska Personal Information Protection Act breach notice) (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)
- AS 12.55.045, Restitution and Compensation (Alaska State Legislature)(akleg.gov)