New Hampshire
New Hampshire Divorce Laws (2026): Grounds, Residency, and Process
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New Hampshire grants divorce on the no-fault ground of irreconcilable differences causing an irremediable breakdown of the marriage under RSA 458:7-a. There is no mandatory separation period and no cooling-off waiting period before a decree may enter. Residency rules depend on whether the defendant is served in-state.
Grounds for divorce in New Hampshire
New Hampshire recognizes both no-fault and fault-based grounds for divorce. The no-fault ground, codified at RSA 458:7-a, is irreconcilable differences causing the irremediable breakdown of the marriage. Either spouse may invoke this ground without proving fault or misconduct, and the other spouse cannot legally block the divorce by denying irreconcilable differences exist.
Fault grounds remain available under RSA 458:7 for spouses who wish to raise misconduct. Those grounds include adultery, extreme cruelty, imprisonment for more than one year, absence for two or more years without being heard from, habitual abuse of alcohol or drugs for 2 or more years together, and willful abandonment for two or more years. Raising a fault ground is optional; most New Hampshire divorces proceed on irreconcilable differences because it avoids the burden of proving wrongdoing and tends to reduce conflict.
Using a fault ground does not automatically result in a larger share of marital property, though a court may consider certain conduct when dividing assets or awarding alimony in appropriate circumstances.
Residency requirement
New Hampshire's residency rules under RSA 458:5 are more flexible than most states and depend on where the parties are located at the time of filing. If both spouses are domiciled in New Hampshire, the plaintiff may file immediately with no minimum residency period. If only the plaintiff is domiciled in New Hampshire but the defendant can be personally served with process within the state, the plaintiff may also file without satisfying any minimum residency period.

A one-year domicile requirement applies in the narrower circumstance where the plaintiff is domiciled in New Hampshire but the defendant is not served with process within the state. In that situation, the plaintiff must have been domiciled in New Hampshire for at least one year before the complaint is filed.
All divorce actions are heard in the Circuit Court, Family Division, in the county where either party resides. New Hampshire's unified family court structure means the same judge handles all related family matters, including parenting, child support, and alimony, within the same proceeding.
Waiting period and separation
New Hampshire has neither a mandatory waiting period nor a separation requirement, which distinguishes it from many other states. A waiting period (sometimes called a cooling-off period) is a minimum number of days that must pass after filing before the court can enter a final divorce decree. New Hampshire imposes no such delay: an uncontested divorce can be finalized as soon as the court processes the paperwork and a hearing is scheduled.
A separation requirement is a different clock entirely. Some states require spouses to live in separate households for a defined period before they can even file or before a no-fault decree can be granted. New Hampshire has no such requirement. Spouses may be living together under the same roof at the time of filing and throughout the proceeding.
In practice, the length of a New Hampshire divorce depends almost entirely on whether it is contested. An uncontested divorce where the parties reach a full agreement on all issues (property, parenting, support) can be finalized within a few weeks to a few months. A contested divorce requiring trial may take a year or more.
How property is divided
New Hampshire is an equitable distribution state, not a community property state. Community property (the rule in Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin) generally splits marital assets and debts 50/50 between spouses. Equitable distribution, by contrast, divides marital property in a manner the court determines is fair and just under all of the circumstances, which often results in an equal split but need not.
Under RSA 458:16-a, New Hampshire courts begin with a presumption that an equal division of marital property is equitable, but either party can rebut that presumption by showing factors that justify a different allocation. Those factors include the length of the marriage, each spouse's age and health, each spouse's occupation and employability, each spouse's income and earning capacity, the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition of marital assets (including homemaking and child-rearing), the market value and tax consequences of the assets, and fault where relevant.
Only marital property is subject to division. Separate property, meaning assets owned before marriage or received during the marriage by gift or inheritance and kept separate, generally remains with the owning spouse. However, separate property that has been commingled with marital funds or that the other spouse has contributed to can sometimes become partially or fully marital in character. If separate assets were mixed with marital funds, get a free case evaluation from a New Hampshire family lawyer on tracing them before the property is divided (attorney advertising).
Alimony, custody, and child support
Alimony, parental rights and responsibilities (New Hampshire's term for legal and physical custody), and child support are all addressed as part of the divorce process in the Circuit Court, Family Division. None of these issues must be resolved before the divorce itself is granted, but they are almost always decided in parallel or in the same judgment.

Term alimony in New Hampshire is governed by RSA 458:19-a. The court first makes the threshold findings in paragraph I: that the party seeking alimony lacks sufficient income or property to meet reasonable needs and cannot be self-supporting, and that the other party can meet the request while still meeting their own reasonable needs.
The amount is then set by the formula in RSA 458:19-a, II(a), which has governed since January 1, 2019. A term alimony order is the lesser of the payee's reasonable need or 23 percent of the difference between the parties' gross incomes at the time the order is created, unless the court finds that justice requires an adjustment. If alimony becomes deductible to the payor and taxable to the payee under federal income tax law, the formula uses 30 percent of that difference instead. For a full breakdown of alimony rules, amounts, and duration, see the New Hampshire alimony laws page.
Child custody (parental rights and responsibilities) focuses on the best interests of the child under RSA 461-A. The court may award joint or sole legal and physical responsibility. Child support is calculated under the New Hampshire Child Support Guidelines (RSA 458-C). The guideline obligation is built from the parents' combined net income and the number of children, applied through the percentage table in RSA 458-C:3. Parenting time is not an input to that formula; it can support a deviation from the guideline amount under RSA 458-C:5, including where the parents share approximately equal residential responsibility. Estimate your payment with our New Hampshire child support calculator. See the New Hampshire child custody laws page and the child support resources for detailed coverage.
How to file for divorce in New Hampshire
Filing for divorce in New Hampshire follows a straightforward procedural sequence, though contested cases add complexity at each step.
First, confirm that you meet the residency requirements under RSA 458:5. In most cases where both spouses live in New Hampshire, there is no minimum waiting period before you can file.
Second, prepare and file a Petition for Divorce (or, if the marriage has not been consummated or is voidable, a Petition for Nullity or Annulment) in the Circuit Court, Family Division, in the county where you or your spouse resides. New Hampshire's court system provides self-help forms through the NH Judicial Branch website for uncontested cases.
Third, serve your spouse with the divorce petition and a summons. Personal service by a sheriff or process server is standard; the defendant then has a set number of days to file an answer.
Fourth, both parties must exchange financial disclosures, including income, assets, debts, and expenses. These disclosures are mandatory and must be completed before any final orders on property, alimony, or support.
Fifth, if the case is uncontested, the parties submit a Permanent Stipulation (marital settlement agreement) covering all issues. The court reviews the agreement to ensure it is equitable, holds a brief final hearing, and enters the divorce decree. If the case is contested, it proceeds through mediation (often required by the court), pretrial conferences, and ultimately a trial before a judge.
The final divorce decree, called a Final Decree of Divorce, terminates the marriage and incorporates all orders on property, alimony, parenting, and support.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Divorce law varies by state and depends on the specific facts of your marriage. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed family-law attorney in New Hampshire.

For the full national overview, see the Divorce Laws by State hub. Related New Hampshire pages: New Hampshire alimony laws and New Hampshire child custody laws.
More New Hampshire Laws
- New Hampshire Alimony Laws
- New Hampshire Child Custody Laws
- New Hampshire Child Support Laws
- New Hampshire Common Law Marriage Laws
- New Hampshire Restraining Order Laws
- New Hampshire Unclaimed Property
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does it take to get a divorce in New Hampshire?
New Hampshire has no mandatory waiting period, so timeline depends on whether the divorce is contested. An uncontested divorce where both parties agree on all issues can be finalized in as little as a few weeks to a couple of months once paperwork is processed and a hearing is scheduled. A contested divorce requiring trial can take a year or more.
How much does a divorce cost in New Hampshire?
Court filing fees vary by county but are typically in the range of a few hundred dollars. Attorney fees depend on the complexity of the case and the degree of conflict. An uncontested divorce handled with limited-scope representation or self-help forms costs far less than a litigated contested divorce, which can run into thousands of dollars in attorney fees.
Do I need a reason to divorce in New Hampshire?
No. New Hampshire allows divorce on the no-fault ground of irreconcilable differences (RSA 458:7-a). You do not need to prove your spouse did anything wrong. Simply stating that irreconcilable differences have caused an irremediable breakdown of the marriage is sufficient.
Is New Hampshire a community property state?
No. New Hampshire is an equitable distribution state. Courts divide marital property in a way that is fair and just given all the circumstances, starting with a presumption of equal division under RSA 458:16-a. The result is often equal, but not always.
How long do I have to be separated to divorce in New Hampshire?
New Hampshire has no separation requirement. You do not need to live apart from your spouse before filing or during the divorce process. Spouses can be living together at the time of filing and still proceed on irreconcilable differences.
Can I get divorced without my spouse agreeing in New Hampshire?
Yes. Because New Hampshire allows no-fault divorce on irreconcilable differences, one spouse's refusal to agree does not prevent the divorce. The case becomes contested, meaning the court will decide disputed issues at trial, but the divorce itself will ultimately be granted.
Do I have to live in New Hampshire to file for divorce here?
Generally yes. You must be domiciled in New Hampshire. If both spouses live in NH, you can file immediately. If your spouse is not in NH and cannot be served in-state, you must have been domiciled in NH for at least one year before filing (RSA 458:5).
Updates
Corrected the habitual substance abuse divorce ground to match RSA 458:7, VII (2 or more years, no financial-injury element), moved the alimony discussion to the operative statute RSA 458:19-a and added its 23 percent gross-income-difference formula, and corrected the child support guideline inputs to combined net income and number of children, with parenting time noted as a deviation factor.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE XLIII DOMESTIC RELATIONS, CHAPTER 458 ANNULMENT, DIVORCE AND SEPARATION
§ 458:7-aAbsolute Divorce, Irreconcilable Differences.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
A divorce from the bonds of matrimony shall be decreed, irrespective of the fault of either party, on the ground of irreconcilable differences which have caused the irremediable breakdown of the marriage. In any pleading or hearing of a petition for divorce under this section, allegations or evidence of specific acts of misconduct shall be improper and inadmissible, except where parental rights and responsibilities are an issue and such evidence is relevant to establish that a particular allocation of parental rights and responsibilities would be detrimental to the child or at a hearing where it is determined by the court to be necessary to establish the existence of irreconcilable differences. If, upon hearing of an action for divorce under this section, both parties are found to have committed an act or acts which justify a finding of irreconcilable differences, a divorce shall be decreed and the acts of one party shall not negate the acts of the other nor bar the divorce decree. The court's findings and decree may be based on oral testimony or written stipulations of the parties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-05 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 52 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Nassar (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2008, 156 N.H. 769)“…rounds and the court adopted their stipulation. Pursuant to RSA 458:7-a (Supp. 2007), parties are entitled to a…”
- Susan Achille v. George Achille, Jr. (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2015, 167 N.H. 706)“…f irreconcilable differences, and not based upon fault. See RSA 458:7-a (Supp. 2014). Consequently, the petitio…”
- Murphy v. Murphy (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1976, 116 N.H. 672)“…bel and the cross-libel alleged irreconcilable differences, RSA 458:7-a (Supp. 1975), as the cause for the divo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Common Law Marriage in New Hampshire: Is It Recognized? (2026), Legal Separation in New Hampshire: RSA 458:26 Rules (2026)
§ 458:7Absolute Divorce, Generally.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
A divorce from the bonds of matrimony shall be decreed in favor of the innocent party for any of the following causes: I. Impotency of either party. II. Adultery of either party. III. Extreme cruelty of either party to the other. IV. Conviction of either party, in any state or federal district, of a crime punishable with imprisonment for more than one year and actual imprisonment under such conviction. V. When either party has so treated the other as seriously to injure health or endanger reason. VI. When either party has been absent 2 years together, and has not been heard of. VII. When either party habitually abuses alcohol or drugs and has been doing so for 2 or more years together. VIII. When either party has joined any religious sect or society which professes to believe the relation of husband and wife unlawful, and has refused to cohabit with the other for 6 months together. IX. When either party, without sufficient cause, and without the consent of the other, has abandoned and refused, for 2 years together, to cohabit with the other. X-XIII. [Repealed.]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 52 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In the Matter of Robert Kempton and Peggy Kempton (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2015, 167 N.H. 785)“…ound of a spouse’s imprisonment for more than one year. See RSA 458:7, IV (2004). The final hearing o…”
- In Re Sarvela (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2006, 154 N.H. 426)“…respondent’s abuse of prescription drugs. See RSA 458:7, VII (2004). Following a two-day hearin…”
- Baker v. Baker (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1980, 120 N.H. 645)“…ndant filed a cross-libel on grounds of refusal to cohabit (RSA 458:7 IX). The master dismissed the defendant…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 458:5Over Parties.In force
Jurisdiction of the parties exists in the following cases only: I. Where both parties were domiciled in the state when the action was commenced. II. Where the plaintiff was so domiciled and the defendant was personally served with process within the state. III. Where the plaintiff was domiciled in the state for one year next preceding the time when the action was commenced. Where the domiciled plaintiff has filed a petition, the non-domiciled defendant may have affirmative relief upon filing a cross petition.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Porter v. Porter (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1972, 112 N.H. 403)“…The issue here is the constitutionality of that part of RSA 458:5 which requires as a condition of jurisd…”
- Williams v. Williams (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1981, 121 N.H. 728)“…516 , 403 A.2d 431, 432 (1979), this court held that RSA 458:5 provides in personam juris…”
- Asadorian v. Asadorian (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1985, 127 N.H. 388)“…lack of compliance with the jurisdictional requirements of RSA 458:5. After an initial continuance granted f…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 458:16-aProperty Settlement.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
I. Property shall include all tangible and intangible property and assets, real or personal, belonging to either or both parties, whether title to the property is held in the name of either or both parties. Intangible property includes, but is not limited to, employment benefits, vested and non-vested pension or other retirement benefits, or savings plans. To the extent permitted by federal law, property shall include military retirement and veterans' disability benefits. II. When a dissolution of a marriage is decreed, the court may order an equitable division of property between the parties. The court shall presume that an equal division is an equitable distribution of property, unless the court establishes a trust fund under RSA 458:20 or unless the court decides that an equal division would not be appropriate or equitable after considering one or more of the following factors: (a) The duration of the marriage. (b) The age, health, social or economic status, occupation, vocational skills, employability, separate property, amount and sources of income, needs and liabilities of each party. (c) The opportunity of each party for future acquisition of capital assets and income.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 161 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Salesky (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2008, 157 N.H. 698)“…the trial court’s property distribution was unsustainable. “RSA 458:16-a, II creates a presumption that equal di…”
- In Re Aube (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2009, 158 N.H. 459)“…elf a marital asset subject to equitable distribution under RSA 458:16-a (2004). Id. at 771 . Th…”
- In Re Hampers (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2006, 154 N.H. 275)“…n, amount and sources of income, the property awarded under RSA 458:16-a (2004), vocational skills, employabilit…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Prenuptial Agreement Laws: RSA 460:2-a (2026)
§ 458:19-aTerm and Reimbursement Alimony.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
I. The court may order term alimony upon agreement of the parties or in the absence of an agreement, at the request of either party by petition or motion in a case for divorce, legal separation, or annulment. Any request for alimony shall be made either before the final decree is effective or not later than 5 years from the effective date. The purpose of term alimony is to allow both parties to maintain a reasonable standard of living. If the issue of term alimony is contested, the court may order term alimony only if it finds that: (a) The party in need lacks sufficient income, property, or both, including property apportioned in accordance with RSA 458:16-a, to provide for his or her own reasonable needs, taking into account the marital lifestyle and the extent to which the parties must both fairly adjust their standards of living based on the creation and maintenance of separate households; or (b) The party in need is unable to be self-supporting at a standard of living that meets reasonable needs through appropriate employment, or is allocated parental rights and responsibilities under RSA 461-A for a child of the parties whose condition or circumstances make it appropriate…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 27 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Owen v. Stewart (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1971, 111 N.H. 350)“…ms of Robert and Antionette. ” “The Court rules that RSA 458:19-a relates to alimony payments and is not…”
- In the Matter of Frederick Wilkinson and Lisa Wilkinson (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2023)“…wife because she is cohabiting with an unrelated adult. See RSA 458:19-aa, VII (Supp. 2022) (providing that the…”
- In the Matter of Noreen Morgan and Thomas Morgan (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2023)“…primarily upon the parties’ income and need. Id. at 83; see RSA 458:19-a (Supp. 2022). On appeal, the respondent…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Alimony Laws: The 2019 Formula and How It Works (2026), Alimony by State: How Spousal Support Works (2026), New Hampshire Annulment Laws: Grounds and How to File (2026)
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE XLIII DOMESTIC RELATIONS, CHAPTER 458-C CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES
§ 458-C:3Child Support Formula.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
I. (a) The child support guidelines shall be based on the following: Percent of Combined Net Income Devoted to Child Support Net income 1 Child 2 Children 3 Children 4 or more Children %5B15,000 or less 25.6 percent 35.5 percent 42.5 percent 45 percent $25,000 25 35 42 44.5 $35,000 24 33.5 40.5 43 $50,000 23 31.5 38 40.5 $60,000 22 30.5 36.5 39 $70,000 21.5 30 36 38.5 $80,000 21 29 35 37.5 $90,000 21 28.5 34.5 37 $100,000 20 27.5 33 35.5 $125,000 or more 19 26 31 33.5 (b) The department of health and human services shall calculate and publish a schedule of child support amounts using the table in subparagraph (a). The schedule shall provide child support amounts in $1,000 increments of combined net income, with a directly proportional change in the percentage of combined net income devoted to child support based on income level and number of children. The department shall determine the fractional percentage between each income level by interpolating between the percentages within each column of the table under subparagraph (a).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 41 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In re Donovan (2005) vacated a Consumer Price Index escalation clause as inconsistent with the RSA 458-C:3 formula because it adjusted support independent of the parties’ actual incomes, and In re Arabian (2004) applied the allowable child care expense deduction in RSA 458-C:3, II(c).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In re Donovan (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2005, 152 N.H. 55)✓A decree raised child support annually by the Consumer Price Index, from $1,599 to $1,828, even as the father's income fell; the court held that escalator inconsistent with the RSA 458-C:3 formula, which ties support to the parties' actual incomes, and struck it.
- In re Arabian (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2004, 151 N.H. 109)✓A father was ordered to pay 75% of his child's extracurriculars, kindergarten, after-school care and summer camp on top of guideline support; the court held RSA 458-C:3 already accounts for such costs in the total obligation, so charging them separately was error.
- In Re Nassar (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2008, 156 N.H. 769)“…sumer price index provision must be stricken as contrary to RSA 458-C:3,11(a) (2004), which provides the comput…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Child Support Laws (2026): Guidelines & Calculator
§ 458-C:5Adjustments to the Application of Guidelines Under Special Circumstances.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
I. Special circumstances, including, but not limited to, the following, if raised by any party to the action or by the court, shall be considered in light of the best interests of the child and may result in adjustments in the application of support guidelines provided under this chapter. The court shall make written findings relative to the applicability of the following: (a) Ongoing extraordinary medical, dental or education expenses, including expenses related to the special needs of a child, incurred on behalf of the involved children. (b) Significantly high or low income of the obligee or obligor. (1) In considering an adjustment when one or both parents have high income, the court shall consider whether the child support amount derived from application of the guidelines substantially exceeds the child's or children's reasonable needs, taking into account the style of living to which the child or children have become accustomed or will experience in either party's home.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 55 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In re Donovan (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2005, 152 N.H. 55)“…rial court to make an express written finding. For example, RSA 458-C:5 (2004) provides that the trial court “s…”
- Rattee v. Rattee (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2001, 146 N.H. 44)“…port guidelines due to his significantly high income. See RSA 458-C:5, 1(b) (1992). The purpose of the child…”
- In re Bazemore (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2006, 153 N.H. 351)“…der, taking all relevant circumstances into consideration.” RSA 458-C:5, I(j) (2004 & Supp. 2005). The party se…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- N.H. RSA 458:7-a (Irreconcilable Differences)(gencourt.state.nh.us).gov
- N.H. RSA 458:5 (Jurisdiction and Residency)(gencourt.state.nh.us).gov
- New Hampshire Judicial Branch, Family Division Self-Help(courts.nh.gov).gov
- N.H. RSA 458:7 (Absolute Divorce, Generally: fault grounds)(gc.nh.gov)
- N.H. RSA 458:19-a (Term and Reimbursement Alimony)(gc.nh.gov)
- N.H. RSA 458-C:3 (Child Support Guidelines: percentage of combined net income)(gc.nh.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.