Arkansas
Common Law Marriage in Arkansas: Is It Recognized? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arkansas does not recognize common law marriage formed within the state. requires a marriage license, and courts have consistently held since at least Fryar v. Roberts (2001) that cohabitation without a license creates no marital rights in Arkansas. Arkansas does recognize a common law marriage that was validly formed in another state.
Information last verified on June 2, 2026.
Does Arkansas recognize common law marriage?
Arkansas does not allow couples to form a common law marriage within the state. requires that every marriage in Arkansas be preceded by a marriage license, and the Arkansas Supreme Court held in Fryar v. Roberts, 346 Ark. 432, 57 S.W.3d 727 (2001), that common law marriage is not recognized in Arkansas. In that case, the court declined to find a valid marriage based on years of cohabitation and a holding-out as married, and it affirmed the general rule that Arkansas has never recognized the common law marriage doctrine.
Arkansas Constitution Amendment 83, adopted by voters in November 2004, defines marriage in Arkansas as only a marriage between a man and a woman and provides that legal status identical or substantially similar to marriage shall not be valid or recognized. Although Amendment 83's scope was fundamentally altered by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), which requires states to license and recognize same-sex marriages, the underlying statutory and case-law prohibition on common law marriage formation in Arkansas remains intact. Arkansas Code section 9-11-201 continues to require a marriage license, and Fryar v. Roberts remains good law on that point.
Why Arkansas has never recognized common law marriage formation
Arkansas has required a marriage license as a precondition to a valid marriage since its territorial period. Unlike states that recognized common law marriage for a time and later abolished it by setting a prospective cutoff date, Arkansas never adopted the common law marriage doctrine to begin with. There is therefore no grandfather date for Arkansas-formed unions.

The license requirement serves several policy purposes the legislature and courts have identified: it creates a clear public record of marital status, protects both parties by making the legal implications of marriage clear at the outset, and avoids the evidentiary difficulties that arise when parties dispute whether a marriage was ever formed.
Because Arkansas has never permitted common law marriage formation, a couple that cohabits in Arkansas for any length of time, presents themselves publicly as married, files joint tax returns, and genuinely believes they are married has nonetheless not formed a legally recognized marriage under Arkansas law without a license.
Does Arkansas recognize a common law marriage from another state?
Yes. Arkansas recognizes a common law marriage validly formed in a state that permits such marriages, under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution and the principle of comity, under which courts recognize legal relationships validly created in other jurisdictions. This recognition applies equally to same-sex and opposite-sex couples; under Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), a state has no lawful basis to refuse to recognize a lawful marriage, including a common law marriage, performed or formed in another state because of the sex of the spouses.
Arkansas Constitution Amendment 83, adopted in 2004, defines marriage in Arkansas as only between a man and a woman, but under Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), a state has no lawful basis to withhold recognition from a lawful marriage formed in another state because of the sex of the spouses. A same-sex couple who validly formed a common law marriage in a state that permits it receives the same Full Faith and Credit and comity recognition in Arkansas as an opposite-sex couple; there is no separate or uncertain standard, and Amendment 83 does not change this outcome.
For a couple, whether same-sex or opposite-sex, who validly formed a common law marriage in a state that permits it, such as Colorado, Texas, Iowa, or another recognized common law marriage state, that marital status travels with them to Arkansas. Arkansas courts treat the couple as legally married for purposes of divorce, property division, spousal support, inheritance rights, intestate succession, and all other legal incidents of marriage.
To establish Arkansas recognition, a party must show that the marriage met all the requirements of the state where it was formed. For instance, a couple asserting a Texas informal marriage under must show they agreed to be married, cohabited in Texas, and represented to others that they were married.
How to prove a common law marriage formed in another state
A common law marriage leaves no license or official certificate, so the burden of proving the marriage rests on the party asserting it. The elements and standard of proof are governed by the law of the state where the marriage was formed, but courts examining the evidence typically look at the same general categories.

Evidence commonly considered includes:
- Joint federal or state tax returns filed as "married filing jointly" or "married filing separately"
- Joint bank accounts, joint deeds, joint mortgage or lease agreements
- Life insurance policies or retirement account beneficiary designations listing the partner as a spouse
- Loan applications or government-benefits forms identifying the relationship as a marriage
- Testimony from family members, friends, coworkers, neighbors, or clergy who regarded the couple as married
- Correspondence, cards, or social media records in which the parties referred to each other as husband, wife, or spouse
- Use of a shared last name
- Birth certificates of children listing both parties as parents with the same last name
No single item is conclusive. Courts assess the totality of the evidence against the requirements of the state where the marriage was allegedly formed.
The 7-year myth
A persistent belief holds that cohabiting for 7 years automatically creates a common law marriage. This is false everywhere in the United States. No state, including the states that still permit common law marriage formation, sets a minimum number of years of cohabitation as a threshold or automatic trigger.
The states that allow common law marriage formation focus on the intent and conduct of the parties: a present mutual agreement to be married, cohabitation in the permitting state, and public representation of the marriage. Duration of cohabitation can be relevant as circumstantial evidence of intent, but no fixed number of years is required.
In Arkansas, this point is especially clear because the state does not allow common law marriage formation at all. No period of cohabitation in Arkansas, whether 7 years or 47 years, creates a legal marriage without a license.
How a common law marriage ends
A valid common law marriage, wherever it was formed, can only be terminated by formal divorce proceedings. There is no such thing as a "common law divorce" and no informal mechanism to dissolve a marriage. Simply separating, dividing property informally, or ceasing to live together does not end a legal marriage.

This has important practical consequences for Arkansas residents. A person with a valid out-of-state common law marriage who moves to Arkansas and "separates" without filing for divorce is still legally married under Arkansas law. Attempting to marry a new partner in Arkansas without obtaining a divorce would create a void or voidable second marriage.
Arkansas divorce proceedings for a valid common law marriage formed in another state follow the same rules as any other Arkansas divorce. The court has jurisdiction over property located in Arkansas, applies Arkansas divorce law, and can issue orders regarding spousal support under Arkansas Code Title 9.
For more on the financial aspects of dissolving a marriage in Arkansas, see Arkansas alimony laws and Arkansas child support laws.
For a state-by-state comparison of common law marriage recognition across all 50 states and DC, see Common law marriage by state.
Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about common law marriage recognition in Arkansas and is not legal advice. Marriage and family law determinations are fact-specific and depend on individual circumstances, including the law of the state where any claimed common law marriage was formed. This information was verified as of June 2, 2026. Consult a licensed Arkansas family law attorney for advice about your specific situation.
Last updated: June 2, 2026.
More Arkansas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Arkansas recognize common law marriage?
No. Arkansas does not allow common law marriage to be formed within the state. Arkansas Code section 9-11-201 requires a marriage license, and the Arkansas Supreme Court confirmed in Fryar v. Roberts, 346 Ark. 432 (2001), that common law marriage is not recognized under Arkansas law.
Is 7 years of living together considered common law marriage in Arkansas?
No. This is a myth. No state requires or recognizes a specific number of cohabitation years as creating a marriage, and Arkansas does not allow common law marriage formation at all. Cohabiting in Arkansas for any number of years, without a marriage license, does not create a legal marriage.
Does Arkansas recognize a common law marriage from another state?
Yes, for a marriage validly formed in a state that permits common law marriage, regardless of whether the spouses are of the same or different sexes. Arkansas applies the Full Faith and Credit Clause and comity principles to give effect to such marriages, and under Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) that recognition cannot turn on the sex of the spouses. A couple who formed a valid common law marriage in Colorado, Texas, or another permitting state retains that marital status in Arkansas.
What did Fryar v. Roberts decide about common law marriage in Arkansas?
In Fryar v. Roberts, 346 Ark. 432, 57 S.W.3d 727 (2001), the Arkansas Supreme Court held that common law marriage is not recognized in Arkansas. The court declined to find a valid marriage despite years of cohabitation and evidence of holding out as married, affirming that a license is required for a valid Arkansas marriage.
Can I get common law spousal rights in Arkansas after a long-term relationship?
Not for a relationship formed and maintained entirely within Arkansas. Without a marriage license, no marital rights arise under Arkansas law regardless of the length or nature of the relationship. If the relationship included a period of cohabitation in a state that permits common law marriage formation and you met that state's requirements, you may be able to assert that a valid marriage was formed there.
Does Amendment 83 of the Arkansas Constitution affect common law marriage?
Amendment 83, adopted in 2004, defines marriage in Arkansas as only between a man and a woman. Its scope was significantly affected by Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) regarding same-sex marriages. However, the underlying prohibition on common law marriage formation within Arkansas is rooted in Arkansas Code section 9-11-201 and Fryar v. Roberts, not solely in Amendment 83, and that prohibition remains in effect regardless of Obergefell.
How do I end a common law marriage from another state if I live in Arkansas?
You must file for divorce in a court with proper jurisdiction. Arkansas courts can dissolve a valid out-of-state common law marriage the same way they dissolve any other marriage, provided the residency and jurisdictional requirements are met. There is no informal or automatic dissolution of a legal marriage. Consult a licensed Arkansas family law attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Updates
Repaired four source links (Ark. Code 9-11-107 and 9-11-201, Fryar v. Roberts, Obergefell v. Hodges) that pointed to homepages or a dead PDF.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Re-cited the Arkansas marriage-license requirement to Ark. Code 9-11-201 (Licenses required); section 9-11-107 only governs recognition of marriages validly formed out of state and was being misattributed as the in-state license requirement throughout the page.
Corrected the page's hedge language on same-sex common law marriages formed in other states: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) settles that Arkansas must give a validly formed out-of-state same-sex common law marriage the same Full Faith and Credit and comity recognition as an opposite-sex one; the prior text incorrectly implied this was an unresolved area needing case-by-case attorney interpretation.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated
§ 9-11-107Validity of foreign marriages.In force
(a) All marriages contracted outside this state that would be valid by the laws of the state or country in which the marriages were consummated and in which the parties then actually resided shall be valid in all the courts in this state. (b) This section shall not apply to a marriage between…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 7 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2018
Leading cases:
- May v. Daniels (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2004, 359 Ark. 100)“…te or country in which the marriages were consummated!].]” Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-107 (Repl. 2002). If we understand Peti…”
- Smith v. Pavan (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2016, 2016 Ark. 437)“…11- 208(a)(1)-(2)) and Act 144 of 1997 (codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-11-107(b), -109); and all other state a…”
- Stovall v. Preston (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2018, 539 S.W.3d 638)“…required for extending comity to foreign marriages, under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-107 (a)." We affirm. By order entered on…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9-11-201Licenses required.In force
(a) All persons hereafter contracting marriage in this state are required to first obtain a license from the clerk of the county court of some county in this state. (b) On and after July 1, 1997, the county clerk shall record the Social Security numbers of the persons obtaining a marriage license…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 4 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2020
Leading cases:
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 1995)“…s Code Annotated relating to marriage licenses, codified at A.C.A. §§ 9-11-201 et seq. (Repl. 1993), neither expressl…”
- Rockefeller v. Rockefeller (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1998, 335 Ark. 145)“…formalities necessary for creating a legal marriage. See Ark.Code Ann. §§ 9-11-201 to 211 (Repl. 1988). If we recognized a…”
- Fryar v. Roberts (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2001, 346 Ark. 432)“…the precursor to one of our current licensing statutes, Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-201 (a) (Repl. 1998). Id. Section 55-201…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Texas Family Code
§ 2.401PROOF OF INFORMAL MARRIAGEIn forcecited in 22 of our articles
(a) In a judicial, administrative, or other proceeding, the marriage of a man and woman may be proved by evidence that: (1) a declaration of their marriage has been signed as provided by this subchapter; or (2) the man and woman agreed to be married and after the agreement they lived together in this state as husband and wife and there represented to others that they were married. (b) If a proceeding in which a marriage is to be proved as provided by Subsection (a)(2) is not commenced before the second anniversary of the date on which the parties separated and ceased living together, it is rebuttably presumed that the parties did not enter into an agreement to be married. (c) A person under 18 years of age may not: (1) be a party to an informal marriage; or (2) execute a declaration of informal marriage under Section 2.402. (d) A person may not be a party to an informal marriage or execute a declaration of an informal marriage if the person is presently married to a person who is not the other party to the informal marriage or declaration of an informal marriage, as applicable.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 98 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Joplin v. Borusheski (2008) applied section 2.401(b): a suit filed over two years after separation raises a rebuttable presumption the parties never agreed to marry, which that proponent did not rebut. In Lan Ngoc Nguyen v. Dinh Duc Nguyen (2011) the 2.401(d) prior-marriage impediment was not proved, and that finding was reversed.
Leading cases:
- Lan Ngoc Nguyen v. Dinh Duc Nguyen (Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) 2011, 355 S.W.3d 82)✓A husband fought his wife's divorce petition by claiming an earlier Vietnamese marriage was an impediment under Section 2.401(d); the court found the proof of that prior marriage factually insufficient and remanded to decide the statute's three informal-marriage elements.
- Assoun v. Gustafson (Court of Appeals of Texas 2016, 493 S.W.3d 156)✓An ex-husband sued to have his former wife declared informally married to her boyfriend, ending his alimony; applying Section 2.401(a), the court affirmed summary judgment for the couple because their sworn denials of any agreement to marry defeated his circumstantial proof.
- Joplin v. Borusheski (Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) 2008, 244 S.W.3d 607)✓A man filed for divorce in 2005 claiming a common-law marriage, more than two years after the couple stopped living together; the court applied Section 2.401(b)'s rebuttable presumption of no agreement to marry and held his testimony failed to rebut it.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Common Law Marriage by State: Where It's Recognized (2026), Common Law Marriage in Arizona: Is It Recognized? (2026), Common Law Marriage in Delaware: Is It Recognized? (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Arkansas Code section 9-11-107(law.justia.com)
- Fryar v. Roberts, 346 Ark. 432 (2001)(law.justia.com)
- Arkansas Constitution Amendment 83(sos.arkansas.gov)
- U.S. Constitution Art. IV sec. 1(law.cornell.edu)
- Arkansas Code section 9-11-201, Licenses required(law.justia.com)
- Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). United States Supreme Court(supreme.justia.com)
- Texas Family Code section 2.401, Informal Marriage. Texas Legislature(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov