North Carolina
North Carolina Age Verification Law: The PAVE Act Explained
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

North Carolina's Pornography Age Verification Enforcement Act, known as the PAVE Act, requires commercial websites where a substantial share of content is harmful to minors to verify a visitor's age. It took effect January 1, 2024, a date several secondary sources report incorrectly as July 1, 2024.
What the PAVE Act Requires
House Bill 8, enacted in the 2023-2024 legislative session, added Article 51 to Chapter 66 of the North Carolina General Statutes. Article 51 runs to just two sections. N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-500 carries the short title and the definitions, and §66-501 carries the operative duty and the civil liability provisions.
Under §66-501(a), a commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or distributes material harmful to minors on the internet, from a website that contains a substantial portion of such material, must verify the age of the individuals attempting to access that material. Verification must run through either a commercially available database that businesses or government entities regularly use for age and identity verification, or another commercially reasonable method of age and identity verification.
The threshold is set in the statute itself, not by outside compliance trackers. N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-500(b)(8) defines a substantial portion as more than thirty-three and one-third percent (33 1/3%) of the total material on a website that meets the definition of material harmful to minors, the same share most other states in this cluster use. That definition of material harmful to minors is borrowed from N.C. Gen. Stat. §14-190.13, a provision that already existed in North Carolina's obscenity statutes before the PAVE Act was enacted.
The law also limits what a site may keep. Under §66-501(b), neither the commercial entity nor a third party performing the age check on its behalf may retain any identifying information about the individual after access has been granted.
One amendment is worth flagging. The definitions section, §66-500, carries a history line recording both the original 2023 enactment (S.L. 2023-132, s. 3.20(a)) and a later change by S.L. 2025-25, s. 29(5). The operative section, §66-501, records no amendment since 2023, so the verification duty, the retention ban, and the civil liability provisions stand as first enacted.
The Effective Date Is January 1, 2024, Not July 1, 2024
A number of secondary sources describe the PAVE Act as taking effect July 1, 2024. That is incorrect. The North Carolina General Assembly's own nonpartisan Legislative Reporting Service bill summary confirms the law's effective date as January 1, 2024. Anyone relying on a July 1, 2024 date for North Carolina specifically is working from an error that appears to have been repeated across several outside trackers.

Two Exemptions Written Into the Statute
Article 51 carves out two groups by name, and both sit in the same section that creates the duty.
News and public interest content is the first. N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-501(f) states that the section does not apply to any bona fide news or public interest broadcast, website, video, report, or event, and that it may not be construed to affect the rights of any news-gathering organization. That term is defined in §66-500(b)(6) to cover an employee of a newspaper, news publication, or news source, printed or on an online or mobile platform, who can document that employment, along with radio and television broadcast stations, cable television operators, wire services, and their employees.
Access providers are the second. N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-501(g) provides that no internet service provider, its affiliates or subsidiaries, search engine, or cloud service provider violates the section solely by providing access or connection to a website or to other content on a facility, system, or network it does not control. The protection reaches transmission, downloading, intermediate storage, and access software, and it applies only to the extent the provider is not responsible for creating the content that constitutes material harmful to minors.
Enforcement: A Private Right of Action
North Carolina's PAVE Act is enforced entirely through private civil litigation. N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-501(c) makes a commercial entity, or a third party performing the required age verification on its behalf, subject to civil liability for any violation of the section. Section 66-501(d) gives the cause of action to two categories of plaintiff: a parent or guardian whose minor was allowed access to the material, and any person whose identifying information is retained in violation of the section.
The remedies are listed in §66-501(e). A court may enter an injunction against continued violation, award compensatory and punitive damages, and award all costs, expenses, and fees related to the investigation and the proceedings, including attorney's fees. Any judgment carries legal interest under N.C. Gen. Stat. §24-5.
The Attorney General has no role. Neither section of Article 51 grants public enforcement authority, creates a civil penalty payable to the state, or assigns rulemaking to an agency, which puts North Carolina's structure closer to Kentucky's and North Dakota's private-right-of-action model than to Oklahoma's, where the Attorney General has independent injunctive authority.

Litigation Status
No lawsuit against the PAVE Act was found in this research. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a similar age-verification requirement against a First Amendment challenge in its 2025 decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, a case brought against a Texas statute rather than North Carolina's; that ruling settled intermediate scrutiny as the applicable standard nationwide but did not itself involve a challenge to North Carolina's law. That absence of a North Carolina-specific suit is worth noting because Free Speech Coalition, the trade association that has led much of the litigation against similar state laws, has sued over comparable statutes in roughly 19 other states. Whether North Carolina's absence from that list reflects a genuine lack of a challenge, sites simply choosing to block North Carolina traffic instead of litigating, or a suit that has not yet surfaced in the sources reviewed, was not resolved in this research. This is a researched absence, not a confirmed clean record, and is worth a fresh check closer to any future update of this page.

Related Resources
- Age Verification Laws by State
- Virginia Age Verification Law
- Georgia Age Verification Law
- Texas Age Verification Law
Last updated: 2026-09-02.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is porn banned in North Carolina?
No. The PAVE Act requires covered websites to verify a visitor's age before granting access to material harmful to minors; it does not prohibit adults from viewing that material once verified.
When did North Carolina's age-verification law take effect?
January 1, 2024. Some secondary sources incorrectly report July 1, 2024; North Carolina's own nonpartisan legislative staff summary confirms the January 1 date.
What law requires age verification in North Carolina?
House Bill 8 (2023), the Pornography Age Verification Enforcement Act or PAVE Act, codified as Article 51 of Chapter 66 of the North Carolina General Statutes. The short title and definitions are in N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-500; the age-verification duty and the civil liability provisions are in §66-501.
How much adult content triggers North Carolina's age-verification requirement?
More than thirty-three and one-third percent (33 1/3%) of the total material on a website. That threshold is defined in the statute itself, at N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-500(b)(8), and it counts only material meeting the definition of material harmful to minors.
Does North Carolina's law apply to news sites, internet providers, or search engines?
No. N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-501(f) exempts any bona fide news or public interest broadcast, website, video, report, or event and preserves the rights of news-gathering organizations. Section 66-501(g) provides that internet service providers, their affiliates and subsidiaries, search engines, and cloud service providers do not violate the law solely by providing access or connection to content they did not create.
Who can sue over a violation of North Carolina's PAVE Act?
A parent or guardian whose minor was allowed access to the material, or any person whose identifying information is retained in violation of the law, through a private civil action under N.C. Gen. Stat. §66-501(d). Article 51 gives the Attorney General no enforcement role.
Has North Carolina's age-verification law been challenged in court?
No lawsuit was found in this research, notable because Free Speech Coalition has sued over similar laws in roughly 19 other states.
Updates
Corrected the name of the PAVE Act to the Pornography Age Verification Enforcement Act, cited the governing sections N.C. Gen. Stat. 66-500 and 66-501 directly, confirmed the 33 1/3% threshold as statutory rather than third-party, added the law’s news and internet-provider exemptions, and noted the 2025 amendment to the definitions section.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 66: Commerce and Business.
§ 66-501Age verification requirements for commercial publication and distribution of material harmful to minors; civil liabilityIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Age Verification Required. - Any commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or distributes material harmful to minors on the internet from a website that contains a substantial portion of such material shall, through use of (i) a commercially available database that is regularly used by businesses or governmental entities for the purpose of age and identity verification, or (ii) another commercially reasonable method of age and identity verification, verify the age of the individuals attempting to access the material. (b) No Data Retention. - Any commercial entity, or third party that performs the required age verification on behalf of the commercial entity, shall not retain any identifying information of the individual after access has been granted to the material. (c) Civil Liability. - Any commercial entity, or third party that performs the required age verification on behalf of the commercial entity, shall be subject to civil liability for any violation of this section. (d) Cause of Action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Also relied on in: North Carolina Pornography Laws (2026): Legal Status and Felonies
§ 66-500Short title; definitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) This Article shall be known as the Pornography Age Verification Enforcement Act or the PAVE Act. (b) The following definitions shall apply to this Article: (1) Commercial entity. - Corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, limited partnerships, sole proprietorships, or other legally recognized entities. (2) Distribute. - To issue, sell, give, provide, deliver, transfer, transmute, circulate, or disseminate by any means. (3) Harmful to minors. - As defined in G.S. 14-190.13. (4) Internet. - The international computer network of both federal and non-federal interoperable packet switched data networks. (5) Material. - As defined in G.S. 14-190.13. (6) News-gathering organization. - Any of the following: a. An employee of a newspaper, news publication, or news source, printed or on an online or mobile platform, of current news and public interest, while operating as an employee as provided in this sub-subdivision, who can provide documentation of such employment with the newspaper, news publication, or news source. b.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 14: Criminal Law.
§ 14-190.13Definitions for certain offenses concerning minorsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
The following definitions apply to G.S. 14-190.14, displaying material harmful to minors; G.S. 14-190.15, disseminating or exhibiting to minors harmful material or performances; G.S. 14-190.16, first degree sexual exploitation of a minor; G.S. 14-190.17, second degree sexual exploitation of a minor; G.S. 14-190.17A, third degree sexual exploitation of a minor; and G.S. 14-190.17C, obscene visual representation of sexual exploitation of a minor: (1) Child sex doll. - Means an anatomically correct doll, mannequin, or robot that meets both of the following requirements: a. Has the features of or features that resemble those of a minor. b. Is intended to be used for sexual stimulation or gratification. (1d) Harmful to minors. - That quality of any material or performance that depicts sexually explicit nudity or sexual activity and that, taken as a whole, has the following characteristics: a. The average adult person applying contemporary community standards would find that the material or performance has a predominant tendency to appeal to a prurient interest of minors in sex; and b.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Fletcher (Supreme Court of North Carolina 2017, 370 N.C. 313)“…rmining that “oral intercourse” as that term is used in N.C.G.S. § 14-190.13(5)(b) did not involve penetration. We g…”
- State v. Howell (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2005, 169 N.C. App. 58)“…minor engaging in sexual activity. Id. N.C.G.S. § 14-190.13 (2000) defines “material” as: “Pictures…”
- Cinema I Video, Inc. v. Thornburg (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 1986, 83 N.C. App. 544)“…t require the use of a live minor. Plaintiffs complain that G.S. 14-190.13(2) states, inter alia, that for purpo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina AI Laws and Regulation (2026), North Carolina Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 24: Interest.
§ 24-5Interest on judgmentsIn force
(a) Actions on Contracts. - In an action for breach of contract, except an action on a penal bond, the amount awarded on the contract bears interest from the date of breach. The fact finder in an action for breach of contract shall distinguish the principal from the interest in the award, and the judgment shall provide that the principal amount bears interest until the judgment is satisfied. If the parties have agreed in the contract that the contract rate shall apply after judgment, then interest on an award in a contract action shall be at the contract rate after judgment; otherwise it shall be at the legal rate. On awards in actions on contracts pursuant to which credit was extended for personal, family, household, or agricultural purposes, however, interest shall be at the lower of the legal rate or the contract rate. For purposes of this section, "after judgment" means after the date of entry of judgment under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 58. (a1) Actions on Penal Bonds. - In an action on a penal bond, the amount of the judgment, except the costs, shall bear interest at the legal rate from the date of entry of judgment under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 58, until the judgment is satisfied.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 173 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rose v. Vulcan Materials Company (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1973, 282 N.C. 643)“…nguish the principal from the sum allowed as interest. ...” G.S. 24-5. In Bond v. Cotton Mills,…”
- Brown v. Flowe (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1998, 349 N.C. 520)“…ensatory damages in the amount of $250,000. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 24-5(b), the trial court applied prejudgment…”
- Sproles v. Greene (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1991, 329 N.C. 603)“…als concluded that “[p]rejudgment interest, provided for by G.S. 24-5, is a ‘cost’ within the meaning of an i…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- North Carolina General Assembly, Legislative Reporting Service, House Bill 8 (2023-2024) Bill Summary(lrs.sog.unc.edu).gov
- Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, 606 U.S. 461 (2025), Opinion of the Court(supremecourt.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-500, Short title; definitions (Pornography Age Verification Enforcement Act)(ncleg.gov)
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-501, Age verification requirements for commercial publication and distribution of material harmful to minors; civil liability(ncleg.gov)