Wisconsin
How Long Is a Life Sentence in Wisconsin? (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Wisconsin, first-degree intentional homicide under Wis. Stat. § 940.01 carries a mandatory life prison sentence. The sentencing judge then sets an extended supervision eligibility date, or imposes life without the possibility of extended supervision. There is no fixed release date; the judge determines when, if ever, release is possible.
This article was last reviewed and updated on March 17, 2026. All statutes, case law, and sentencing data have been verified against current Wisconsin government sources.
In Wisconsin, a life sentence operates differently from most states. When a defendant is convicted of first-degree intentional homicide, the judge must sentence them to life in prison. The judge then has the discretion to either set an extended supervision eligibility date, the earliest point at which the defendant could be considered for release, or to impose life without the possibility of extended supervision, which is Wisconsin's version of LWOP.
Wisconsin holds a unique place in American criminal justice history. In 1853, the state became one of the first in the nation to abolish the death penalty. The last execution in Wisconsin took place on August 21, 1851, making it more than 170 years since anyone was put to death by the state.
Wisconsin Homicide Statutes
Wisconsin's approach to classifying homicide is distinctive. Rather than using the traditional "first-degree murder" and "second-degree murder" labels common in most states, Wisconsin uses specific descriptive categories.

First-Degree Intentional Homicide (Wis. Stat. § 940.01): Causing the death of another human being with intent to kill. This is the most serious homicide charge in Wisconsin and carries a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment. The judge sets an extended supervision eligibility date or imposes life without extended supervision.
First-Degree Reckless Homicide (Wis. Stat. § 940.02): Recklessly causing the death of another human being under circumstances showing utter disregard for human life. This is a Class B felony carrying a maximum of 60 years in prison.
Second-Degree Intentional Homicide (Wis. Stat. § 940.05): Intentionally causing the death of another person with mitigating circumstances, such as adequate provocation, unnecessary defensive force, or prevention of a felony. This is a Class B felony carrying a maximum of 60 years in prison.
Second-Degree Reckless Homicide (Wis. Stat. § 940.06): Recklessly causing the death of another person. This is a Class D felony carrying a maximum of 25 years.
Felony Murder (Wis. Stat. § 940.03): Causing the death of another human being while committing or attempting to commit a felony. Felony murder is an unclassified offense: the maximum penalty is the predicate felony's own statutory maximum sentence plus up to 15 years, not a flat term. Depending on the underlying felony, that can run well above or below 60 years.
Why Wisconsin Doesn't Use "Murder"
Wisconsin's criminal code deliberately avoids the term "murder" in its statutory language. Instead, the legislature chose the term "homicide" with specific modifiers (intentional, reckless, negligent) to more precisely describe the offender's mental state. This approach is intended to promote clarity in jury instructions and sentencing.
However, in practice, "first-degree intentional homicide" is functionally equivalent to what other states call "first-degree murder."
Extended Supervision and Release Eligibility
Wisconsin does not have a traditional parole system for most felony offenses committed after 1999.
Truth-in-Sentencing (2000): Wisconsin implemented truth-in-sentencing reforms effective in 2000, eliminating the old parole system for offenses committed on or after December 31, 1999. Under the new system, sentences are divided into a confinement portion and an extended supervision portion. The inmate serves the full confinement portion before becoming eligible for extended supervision.
Life sentences, judge sets the date: For first-degree intentional homicide, the judge imposes a life sentence and then determines the extended supervision eligibility date. Under Wis. Stat. § 973.014(1g)(a), for crimes committed on or after December 31, 1999, the judge must choose one of three options: the person is eligible for release to extended supervision after serving 20 years; the person is eligible on a later date the court sets (never earlier than the 20-year date); or the person is not eligible for release to extended supervision. The 20-year option applies by operation of the statute and needs no court-set date. A never-eligible sentence is an affirmative choice the judge makes, not a default.
Life without extended supervision: The judge may determine that the offender should never be released. In this case, the sentence is life without the possibility of extended supervision, Wisconsin's functional equivalent of LWOP.
When the judge has no choice: Section 973.014(2) takes some life sentences out of the judge's discretion. A life sentence imposed on a persistent repeater under Wis. Stat. § 939.62(2m)(c) must be without the possibility of parole or extended supervision. A life sentence for trafficking of a child involving at least 3 child victims under Wis. Stat. § 948.051(1)(b) or (2)(b) must be without the possibility of extended supervision.
Pre-2000 offenses: Inmates sentenced before truth-in-sentencing may still be eligible for parole under the old system. The Wisconsin Parole Commission reviews these cases.
Extended Supervision Conditions
If an inmate is eventually released to extended supervision, they remain under the control of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections for the rest of their life. Conditions of extended supervision typically include:
- Regular reporting to a supervision agent
- Restrictions on travel, association, and residence
- Electronic monitoring in some cases
- Prohibition on possessing weapons
- Drug and alcohol testing
- Participation in treatment programs
Violation of any condition can result in a return to prison. For life-sentenced inmates, extended supervision is truly a lifetime commitment.
Notable Life Sentence Cases in Wisconsin
Steven Avery: Making a Murderer
Steven Avery's case became internationally famous through the Netflix documentary series Making a Murderer (2015). Avery was convicted in 2007 of the first-degree intentional homicide of photographer Teresa Halbach in Manitowoc County. He was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of extended supervision.
Avery had previously served 18 years in prison for a sexual assault he did not commit before being exonerated by DNA evidence in 2003. His subsequent murder conviction, and the circumstances surrounding the investigation, raised profound questions about the Wisconsin criminal justice system. His appeals and post-conviction motions, led by attorney Kathleen Zellner, have continued for years.
Brendan Dassey: Making a Murderer
Brendan Dassey, Steven Avery's nephew, was 16 years old when he was convicted of being a party to first-degree intentional homicide, mutilation of a corpse, and second-degree sexual assault in connection with Teresa Halbach's death. He was sentenced to life in prison with an extended supervision eligibility date of 2048.
Dassey's case raised significant concerns about the interrogation of juvenile suspects. His confession was obtained without a parent or attorney present and was characterized by defense experts as coerced. A federal magistrate judge and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (in a split decision) initially granted habeas corpus relief, but the full Seventh Circuit reversed that ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case in 2018.
Ed Gein
While Ed Gein's crimes in Plainfield, Wisconsin in the 1950s predated modern sentencing law, his case remains one of the most infamous in Wisconsin history. Gein was found not guilty by reason of insanity and committed to a state psychiatric hospital, where he died in 1984. His crimes inspired fictional characters including Norman Bates in Psycho and Leatherface in The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.
Recent Legislative Changes
| Year | Change |
|---|---|
| 2023 | Ongoing discussions about criminal justice reform and sentence modification |
| 2015 | Making a Murderer documentary renews national attention on Wisconsin's justice system |
| 2000 | Truth-in-Sentencing implemented; parole eliminated for new offenses |
| 1853 | Death penalty abolished, among the first states in the U.S. |
| 1851 | Last execution carried out (John McCaffary) |
Wisconsin has not enacted major changes to its life sentencing framework in recent years. The truth-in-sentencing system implemented in 2000 remains the governing structure for all felony sentences.
Periodic legislative proposals to reinstate the death penalty have been introduced but have consistently failed to gain traction. Public polling in Wisconsin has generally shown opposition to capital punishment, consistent with the state's 170-plus year tradition of abolition.
Juvenile Life Sentences
Wisconsin's approach to juvenile sentencing has evolved in response to U.S. Supreme Court mandates and growing scientific understanding of adolescent development.
Miller compliance: Following Miller v. Alabama (2012), Wisconsin ensures that juvenile offenders convicted of first-degree intentional homicide are not subjected to mandatory life without the possibility of release. Under Miller, a sentencer must consider a juvenile offender's youth and its attendant characteristics before imposing life without parole.
Juvenile extended supervision: For juvenile offenders sentenced to life, the judge must consider the offender's age, maturity, family circumstances, and potential for rehabilitation when setting the extended supervision eligibility date. The Brendan Dassey case illustrates how this works: despite a life sentence, his extended supervision eligibility date was set for 2048, when he would be approximately 59 years old.
Original adult-court jurisdiction: Under Wis. Stat. § 938.183(1)(am), juveniles age 10 and older accused of first-degree intentional homicide (or attempt) fall under adult criminal court's original jurisdiction automatically, not a discretionary waiver, though they can petition for reverse waiver back to juvenile court. A separate, broader discretionary-waiver provision covers other serious offenses at older ages.
Juvenile corrections: The Wisconsin Department of Corrections operates juvenile correctional facilities separate from adult prisons, though juveniles tried and sentenced as adults may be transferred to adult facilities.
Historical Context
Wisconsin's criminal justice history is notable for its early and sustained rejection of capital punishment.
The McCaffary execution (1851): John McCaffary was the first and only person legally executed by the state of Wisconsin. He was hanged on August 21, 1851, for drowning his wife. The execution was reportedly botched. McCaffary did not die immediately and strangled slowly before a horrified crowd. Public revulsion at the spectacle contributed directly to the abolition movement.
Abolition in 1853: Just two years after the McCaffary execution, the Wisconsin legislature abolished the death penalty. Wisconsin was among the earliest states to abolish capital punishment; Michigan (which abolished capital punishment in 1846) acted before it.
Progressive tradition: Wisconsin's early abolition of the death penalty is consistent with its broader progressive tradition. The state was a leader in workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and other social reforms in the early 20th century.
Modern sentencing: The shift from indeterminate to determinate sentencing in 2000 was the most significant change to Wisconsin's sentencing framework in modern history. The elimination of parole and the adoption of truth-in-sentencing reflected a national trend toward more structured, predictable sentences.
Prison population: The Wisconsin Department of Corrections oversees approximately 20,000 inmates. The state's incarceration rate is below the national average but above that of neighboring Minnesota. Racial disparities in Wisconsin's prison population have been a persistent concern. The state has one of the highest Black-to-white incarceration ratios in the nation.
Wisconsin Life Sentence at a Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Life with extended supervision | Eligible after 20 years, or on a later date the judge sets |
| Life without extended supervision | Available for first-degree intentional homicide; required for persistent repeaters and certain child-trafficking life sentences (§ 973.014(2)) |
| Death penalty | Abolished 1853 |
| Last execution | August 21, 1851 (John McCaffary) |
| Juvenile LWOP | Not mandatory; individualized sentencing required |
| Parole system | Abolished for post-1999 offenses (truth-in-sentencing) |
| Homicide classification | Does not use "murder"; uses "homicide" with modifiers |
| Key statutes | Wis. Stat. §§ 973.014 (life sentence release eligibility), 939.50 (Class A felony = life imprisonment), 940.01, 940.02, 940.03, 940.05 |
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is a life sentence in Wisconsin?
For first-degree intentional homicide, the sentence is mandatory life in prison. The judge then sets an extended supervision eligibility date, the earliest point at which the inmate could be considered for release, or imposes life without the possibility of extended supervision (Wisconsin's version of LWOP). Under Wis. Stat. § 973.014(1g)(a), the judge chooses eligibility after 20 years, eligibility on a later court-set date, or no eligibility. For persistent repeaters and certain child-trafficking life sentences, § 973.014(2) requires a sentence with no release to extended supervision.
Does Wisconsin have the death penalty?
No. Wisconsin abolished the death penalty in 1853, making it among the very first states to do so. The last execution was carried out on August 21, 1851. The state has not executed anyone in over 170 years, and periodic efforts to reinstate capital punishment have failed.
Why doesn't Wisconsin use the word 'murder' in its criminal code?
Wisconsin's criminal code uses the term 'homicide' with specific modifiers: 'first-degree intentional homicide,' 'first-degree reckless homicide,' etc., rather than the traditional 'first-degree murder' and 'second-degree murder' labels. This approach was chosen to more precisely describe the offender's mental state and promote clarity in jury instructions.
What happened in the Steven Avery case?
Steven Avery was convicted in 2007 of the first-degree intentional homicide of Teresa Halbach and sentenced to life without the possibility of extended supervision. His case gained international attention through the Netflix documentary Making a Murderer. Avery had previously served 18 years for a wrongful conviction before being exonerated by DNA evidence.
Can a juvenile get life without parole in Wisconsin?
Mandatory juvenile LWOP is unconstitutional under Miller v. Alabama (2012). Under Miller, a judge may not sentence a juvenile homicide offender to life without parole without first considering the offender's youth and its attendant characteristics, such as immaturity and capacity for change. Brendan Dassey, for example, was sentenced to life with an extended supervision eligibility date of 2048.
Updates
Corrected the description of Miller v. Alabama to the process the Court actually required: considering a juvenile's youth before imposing life without parole.
Punctuation restored where an automated edit had produced comma splices.
Corrected how Wisconsin judges set release eligibility on life sentences under Wis. Stat. § 973.014, added the life sentences that by law carry no release, and fixed a death-penalty abolition chronology error.
Corrected the felony-murder penalty description: Wis. Stat. § 940.03 is an unclassified sentence enhancement (the predicate felony's own maximum plus up to 15 years), not a flat 60-year Class B felony. Also corrected the juvenile adult-court jurisdiction age for first-degree intentional homicide from 15 to the statute's actual age-10 threshold (Wis. Stat. § 938.183(1)(am)).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 973: Sentencing
§ 973.014Sentence of life imprisonment; parole eligibility determination; extended supervision eligibility determination.In force
(1) Except as provided in sub. (2), when a court sentences a person to life imprisonment for a crime committed on or after July 1, 1988, but before December 31, 1999, the court shall make a parole eligibility determination regarding the person and choose one of the following options: (a) The person is eligible for parole under s. 304.06 (1). (b) The person is eligible for parole on a date set by the court. Under this paragraph, the court may set any later date than that provided in s. 304.06 (1), but may not set a date that occurs before the earliest possible parole eligibility date as calculated under s. 304.06 (1). (c) The person is not eligible for parole. This paragraph applies only if the court sentences a person for a crime committed on or after August 31, 1995, but before December 31, 1999. (1g) (a) Except as provided in sub. (2), when a court sentences a person to life imprisonment for a crime committed on or after December 31, 1999, the court shall make an extended supervision eligibility date determination regarding the person and choose one of the following options: 1. The person is eligible for release to extended supervision after serving 20 years. 2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 940: Crimes Against Life And Bodily Security
§ 940.01First-degree intentional homicide.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) Offenses. (a) Except as provided in sub. (2), whoever causes the death of another human being with intent to kill that person or another is guilty of a Class A felony. (b) Except as provided in sub. (2), whoever causes the death of an unborn child with intent to kill that unborn child, kill the woman who is pregnant with that unborn child or kill another is guilty of a Class A felony. (2) Mitigating circumstances. The following are affirmative defenses to prosecution under this section which mitigate the offense to 2nd-degree intentional homicide under s. 940.05: (a) Adequate provocation. Death was caused under the influence of adequate provocation as defined in s. 939.44. (b) Unnecessary defensive force. Death was caused because the actor believed he or she or another was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that the force used was necessary to defend the endangered person, if either belief was unreasonable. (c) Prevention of felony. Death was caused because the actor believed that the force used was necessary in the exercise of the privilege to prevent or terminate the commission of a felony, if that belief was unreasonable. (d) Coercion; necessity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 148 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Head (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2002, 255 Wis. 2d 194)“…harged with first-degree intentional homicide, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 940.01 (1997-1998). [4] She admitted that sh…”
- State v. Lo (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2003, 264 Wis. 2d 1)“…rty. Id. ¶ 64. The statutes at issue in Head are Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01 (2)(b) and 940.05. Wisconsin Stat. § 94…”
- State v. Watkins (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2002, 255 Wis. 2d 265)“…irst-degree intentional homicide, while armed, pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01 (1) and 939.63. *278…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Murder Sentencing Guidelines: Min & Max Prison Time by State (2026), Wisconsin Manslaughter Laws: Second-Degree and Reckless Homicide, Wisconsin Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 940.05Second-degree intentional homicide.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) Whoever causes the death of another human being with intent to kill that person or another is guilty of a Class B felony if: (a) In prosecutions under s. 940.01, the state fails to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the mitigating circumstances specified in s. 940.01 (2) did not exist as required by s. 940.01 (3); or (b) The state concedes that it is unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the mitigating circumstances specified in s. 940.01 (2) did not exist. By charging under this section, the state so concedes. (2) In prosecutions under sub. (1), it is sufficient to allege and prove that the defendant caused the death of another human being with intent to kill that person or another. (2g) Whoever causes the death of an unborn child with intent to kill that unborn child, kill the woman who is pregnant with that unborn child or kill another is guilty of a Class B felony if: (a) In prosecutions under s. 940.01, the state fails to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the mitigating circumstances specified in s. 940.01 (2) did not exist as required by s.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Head (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2002, 255 Wis. 2d 194)“…public disaster or imminent death to himself or another. Wis. Stat. § 940.05 (1985-86). Manslaughter was a Class C…”
- State v. Watkins (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2002, 255 Wis. 2d 265)“…guilty of second-degree intentional homicide, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 940.05 . The court stated: [T]he State…”
- State v. Felix (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2012, 339 Wis. 2d 670)“…ormation of second-degree intentional homicide contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.05 (l)(b). 16 Felix was sentenced to 28 y…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 940.02First-degree reckless homicide.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Whoever recklessly causes the death of another human being under circumstances which show utter disregard for human life is guilty of a Class B felony. (1m) Whoever recklessly causes the death of an unborn child under circumstances that show utter disregard for the life of that unborn child, the woman who is pregnant with that unborn child or another is guilty of a Class B felony. (2) Whoever causes the death of another human being under any of the following circumstances is guilty of a Class B felony: (a) By manufacture, distribution or delivery, in violation of s. 961.41, of a controlled substance included in schedule I or II under ch. 961, of a controlled substance analog of a controlled substance included in schedule I or II under ch. 961 or of ketamine or flunitrazepam, if another human being uses the controlled substance or controlled substance analog and dies as a result of that use. This paragraph applies: 1. Whether the human being dies as a result of using the controlled substance or controlled substance analog by itself or with any compound, mixture, diluent or other substance mixed or combined with the controlled substance or controlled substance analog. 2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 61 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Head (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2002, 255 Wis. 2d 194)“…l purpose to take the life of another human *224 being." Wis. Stat. § 940.02 (1985-86). This two-element offense wa…”
- State v. Tomlinson (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2002, 254 Wis. 2d 502)“…s homicide while using a dangerous weapon, in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 940.02 (1), 939.05, and 939.63 (1999-2000) [1]…”
- State v. Kleser (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2010, 328 Wis. 2d 42)“…o applies to juveniles who allegedly commit a violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.02 (first-degree reckless homicide) or a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 940.06Second-degree reckless homicide.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Whoever recklessly causes the death of another human being is guilty of a Class D felony. (2) Whoever recklessly causes the death of an unborn child is guilty of a Class D felony. Judicial Council Note, 1988: Second-degree reckless homicide is analogous to the prior offense of homicide by reckless conduct. The revised statute clearly requires proof of a subjective mental state, i.e., criminal recklessness. See s. 939.24 and the NOTE thereto. [Bill 191-S]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 27 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Lechner (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1998, 217 Wis. 2d 392)“…nses: (1) second-degree reckless homicide, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.06 ; (2) homicide by intoxicated use of a…”
- State v. Dale R. Neumann (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2013, 348 Wis. 2d 455)“…(l)(d). This is the same as the penalty for a violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.06 , second-degree reckless homicide. ¶…”
- State v. Raheem Moore (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2015)“…s. 2d 675, 846 N.W.2d 18. 2 Contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.06(1) and 939.05. All subsequent ref…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 940.03Felony murder.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Whoever causes the death of another human being while committing or attempting to commit a crime specified in s. 940.225 (1) or (2) (a), 940.30, 940.31, 940.60, 940.61, 940.62, 940.65, 943.02, 943.10 (2), 943.231 (1), 943.32 (2), or 947.016 (1), (2), or (3) or s. 940.19, 2023 stats., s. 940.195, 2023 stats., s. 940.20, 2023 stats., s. 940.201, 2023 stats., s. 940.203, 2023 stats., or s. 940.204, 2023 stats., may be imprisoned for not more than 15 years in excess of the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for that crime or attempt. Judicial Council Note, 1988: The prior felony murder statute (s. 940.02 (2)) did not allow enhanced punishment for homicides caused in the commission of a Class B felony. State v. Gordon, 111 Wis. 2d 133, 330 N.W.2d 564 (1983). The revised statute eliminates the “natural and probable consequence” limitation and limits the offense to homicides caused in the commission of or attempt to commit armed robbery, armed burglary, arson, first-degree sexual assault or 2nd-degree sexual assault by use or threat of force or violence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Maltese Lavele Williams (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2015, 364 Wis. 2d 126)“…at have people deceased, people 3 Contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.03, 943.32(2), 939.32, and 939.05. 4…”
- State v. Krawczyk (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2002, 259 Wis. 2d 843)“…er to convict him of felony murder. According to Krawczyk, Wis. Stat. § 940.03 (1999-2000) 2 requires th…”
- State v. Mason (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2004, 276 Wis. 2d 434)“…the circuit court misconstrued the felony murder statute, Wis. Stat. § 940.03 (1999-2000), 1 and, there…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 939: Crimes
§ 939.50Classification of felonies.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
(1) Felonies in the statutes are classified as follows: (a) Class A felony. (b) Class B felony. (c) Class C felony. (d) Class D felony. (e) Class E felony. (f) Class F felony. (g) Class G felony. (h) Class H felony. (i) Class I felony. (2) A felony is a Class A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, or I felony when it is so specified in the statutes. (3) Penalties for felonies are as follows: (a) For a Class A felony, life imprisonment. (b) For a Class B felony, imprisonment not to exceed 60 years. (c) For a Class C felony, a fine not to exceed $100,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 40 years, or both. (d) For a Class D felony, a fine not to exceed $100,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 25 years, or both. (e) For a Class E felony, a fine not to exceed $50,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 15 years, or both. (f) For a Class F felony, a fine not to exceed $25,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 12 years and 6 months, or both. (g) For a Class G felony, a fine not to exceed $25,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 10 years, or both. (h) For a Class H felony, a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 6 years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 95 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Lechner (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1998, 217 Wis. 2d 392)“…ce to the penalty structure the legislature established in Wis. Stat. §§ 939.50 through 939.52. "While the word 'serio…”
- State v. Gerald D. Taylor (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2013, 347 Wis. 2d 30)“…mum term of imprisonment for a Class H felony is six years. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(3)(h)——(i).…”
- State v. Head (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2002, 255 Wis. 2d 194)“…s two-element offense was punishable by life imprisonment. Wis. Stat. § 939.50 (3)(a) (1985-86). ¶ 56. Section 940.0…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Many Years for Second Degree Murder? Sentences by State (2026), Wisconsin Smart Glasses Recording Laws, Wisconsin Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 939.62Increased penalty for habitual criminality.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) If the actor is a repeater, as that term is defined in sub. (2), and the present conviction is for any crime for which imprisonment may be imposed, except for an escape under s. 946.42 or a failure to report under s. 946.425, the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed by law for that crime may be increased as follows: (a) A maximum term of imprisonment of one year or less may be increased to not more than 2 years. (b) A maximum term of imprisonment of more than one year but not more than 10 years may be increased by not more than 2 years if the prior convictions were for misdemeanors and by not more than 4 years if the prior conviction was for a felony. (c) A maximum term of imprisonment of more than 10 years may be increased by not more than 2 years if the prior convictions were for misdemeanors and by not more than 6 years if the prior conviction was for a felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 111 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Erickson (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1999, 227 Wis. 2d 758)“…ady been convicted of "serious child sex offense[s]" under Wis. Stat. § 939.62 (2m), a conviction on either of the two…”
- State v. Myron C. Dillard (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2014, 358 Wis. 2d 543)“…Wis. Stat. § 940.30, with a repeater enhancer pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 939.62. ¶17 Had the defendant been…”
- State v. Gerald D. Taylor (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2013, 347 Wis. 2d 30)“…ars if the prior convictions were for misdemeanors . . . ." Wis. Stat. § 939.62(1)(b). "Subject to the minimum pe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Felony Classes and Misdemeanor Penalties (2026)
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 938: Juvenile Justice Code
§ 938.183Original adult court jurisdiction for criminal proceedings.In force
(1) Juveniles under adult court jurisdiction. Notwithstanding ss. 938.12 (1) and 938.18, courts of criminal jurisdiction have exclusive original jurisdiction over all of the following: (a) A juvenile who has been adjudicated delinquent and who is alleged to have violated s. 940.61 (2) (a) or 946.43 or s. 940.20 (1), 2023 stats., while placed in a juvenile correctional facility, a juvenile detention facility, or a secured residential care center for children and youth or who has been adjudicated delinquent and who is alleged to have committed a violation of s. 940.62 (2) (b) or s. 940.20 (2m), 2023 stats. (am) A juvenile who is alleged to have attempted or committed a violation of s. 940.01 or to have committed a violation of s. 940.02 or 940.05 on or after the juvenile’s 10th birthday. (ar) A juvenile specified in par. (a) or (am) who is alleged to have attempted or committed a violation of any state criminal law in addition to the violation alleged under par. (a) or (am) if the violation alleged under this paragraph and the violation alleged under par. (a) or (am) may be joined under s. 971.12 (1).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Ninham (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2011, 333 Wis. 2d 335)“…jected Ninham to the jurisdiction of criminal court. See Wis. Stat. § 938.183 (1)(am) (1997-98). 5 *349 ¶ 22. On…”
- State v. Kleser (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2010, 328 Wis. 2d 42)“…e original jurisdiction of the adult criminal court. See Wis. Stat. §§ 938.183 (1) and 970.032(1) and (2) (2005-06). […”
- State v. Raheem Moore (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2015)“…y juveniles, including second degree reckless homicide. See Wis. Stat. § 938.183.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 948: Crimes Against Children
§ 948.051Trafficking of a child.In force
(1) Whoever knowingly recruits, entices, provides, obtains, sells, purchases, harbors, transports, transfers, receives, patronizes, solicits, isolates, holds, confines, or deprives of liberty or knowingly attempts to recruit, entice, provide, obtain, sell, purchase, harbor, transport, transfer, receive, patronize, solicit, isolate, hold, confine, or deprive of liberty any child for the purpose of commercial sex acts, as defined in s. 940.302 (1) (a), is guilty of the following: (a) Except as provided in par. (b), a Class B felony. (b) If the act involves at least 3 victims who are children at the time the act is committed, a Class A felony. The term of imprisonment is life imprisonment without the possibility of extended supervision. (2) Whoever benefits in any manner from a violation of sub. (1) is guilty of the following if the person knows that the benefits come from an act described in sub. (1): (a) Except as provided in par. (b), a Class B felony. (b) If the violation involves at least 3 victims who are children at the time of the violation, a Class A felony. The term of imprisonment is life imprisonment without the possibility of extended supervision.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Mitchell D. Green (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2023, 408 Wis. 2d 248)“…child, a class C felony, among other offenses. See Wis. Stat. § 948.051(1) (2017–18).1 1All subsequent r…”
- Mitchell Green v. Milwaukee County Circuit Court (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2025)“…Court with trafficking a child and other related offenses. See Wis. Stat. §948.051(1). The case proceeded to a jury trial…”
- Mannery v. City of Milwaukee (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 2022)“…s wanted for human trafficking, a crime in Wisconsin. See Wis. Stat. §948.051. Braunreiter and Bracero therefore ha…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- Wis. Stat. § 940.01(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 940.02(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 940.05(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 940.06(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 940.03(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wisconsin Parole Commission(doc.wi.gov).gov
- *Miller v. Alabama*(law.cornell.edu).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 938.183(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 973.014(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)
- Wis. Stat. § 939.50(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)
- Wis. Stat. § 939.62(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)
- Wis. Stat. § 948.051(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)