Washington
How Long Is a Life Sentence in Washington? (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · 11 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Washington, aggravated first-degree murder carries mandatory life without the possibility of parole under RCW 10.95.030 (the offense and its aggravating circumstances are defined in RCW 10.95.020), while other murder convictions result in fixed, determinate sentences under the 1984 Sentencing Reform Act. Washington abolished traditional parole that year, so most life-sentenced inmates serve every day of their court-imposed term.
This article was last reviewed and updated on March 17, 2026. All statutes, case law, and sentencing data have been verified against current Washington State government sources.
In Washington State, a life sentence can mean several different things depending on the specific conviction. Some life sentences carry eventual eligibility for parole or release consideration, while others, particularly aggravated first-degree murder, result in life without the possibility of parole.
Washington's approach to its most serious punishments has undergone a dramatic transformation in recent years. The state Supreme Court struck down the death penalty in 2018 as racially biased, and the legislature formally abolished it in 2023. These changes mean that LWOP is now the most severe sentence available in Washington.
Washington Life Sentence Statutes
Washington's criminal code categorizes homicide offenses with distinct sentencing structures.

Aggravated First-Degree Murder (RCW 10.95.020): This is the most serious charge in Washington. It applies when first-degree murder is committed with specific aggravating factors, such as murder for hire, murder of a law enforcement officer, murder during the commission of a robbery or rape, or murder involving multiple victims. The sentence, imposed by RCW 10.95.030, is life without the possibility of parole. Along with a third strike under Washington's Three Strikes law, this is one of the two paths to a mandatory LWOP sentence in Washington.
First-Degree Murder (RCW 9A.32.030): Premeditated murder or felony murder committed during certain dangerous felonies. First-degree murder is a Class A felony with a standard sentencing range determined by the offender's criminal history score under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act. The maximum sentence is life in prison, but most sentences are determinate (fixed-term) rather than indeterminate.
Second-Degree Murder (RCW 9A.32.050): Intentional murder without premeditation, or causing death during the commission of a felony not listed under first-degree felony murder. This is also a Class A felony, carrying a maximum of life in prison but typically resulting in a determinate sentence of 10 to 18 years or more depending on criminal history.
Manslaughter in the First Degree (RCW 9A.32.060): Recklessly causing the death of another person. A Class A felony with a maximum of life, though standard sentencing ranges are considerably lower. Our guide to Washington manslaughter laws covers both degrees, their sentencing ranges and vehicular homicide.
Parole and Release Eligibility
Washington abolished traditional parole in 1984 with the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA), replacing indeterminate sentences with determinate sentences for most offenses. However, several release mechanisms still exist for life-sentenced inmates.
Determinate sentences: Most murder convictions in Washington result in a determinate (fixed-term) sentence calculated using sentencing guidelines. Inmates serve the full term minus any earned early release credits, but those credits are limited for murder. First- and second-degree murder are serious violent offenses, so for offenses committed on or after July 1, 2003, earned release time may not exceed 10 percent of the sentence under RCW 9.94A.729(3). First-degree murder also carries a 20-year mandatory minimum under RCW 9.94A.540, and no earned release time is available during that minimum term.
LWOP (aggravated first-degree murder): No release eligibility. The only paths to freedom are executive clemency from the governor or a successful court appeal.
Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB): The ISRB reviews cases for inmates sentenced under the pre-1984 indeterminate sentencing system. The board also handles certain sex offense sentences and other specific categories.
Juvenile 20-Year Petition and Prosecutor-Initiated Resentencing
Washington does not have a general inmate-initiated reentry review program. Two narrower mechanisms exist instead. Under RCW 9.94A.730, a person convicted of a crime committed before their 18th birthday may petition the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board for early release after serving at least 20 years, provided they have no disqualifying later convictions or serious infractions. This route does not apply to sentences imposed under the death penalty or LWOP statutes.
Separately, 2020's SB 6164 (codified at RCW 36.27.130) created prosecutor-initiated resentencing: only the prosecutor of the county where the offender was sentenced, not the inmate, may petition a court to reconsider a past sentence. Neither mechanism functions as a general inmate-initiated release review, and LWOP sentences generally fall outside both.
Clemency and the Clemency and Pardons Board
The Washington State Clemency and Pardons Board can recommend sentence commutations to the governor. For LWOP inmates, executive clemency is the only administrative path to release. The board conducts hearings and makes non-binding recommendations to the governor, who has sole authority to grant clemency.
Death Penalty Abolished
Washington's path to abolishing the death penalty was one of the most significant criminal justice developments in recent U.S. history.
State v. Gregory (2018): Landmark Ruling
In State v. Gregory (2018), the Washington Supreme Court unanimously struck down the state's death penalty as unconstitutional under the state constitution. The court found that the death penalty was imposed in an arbitrary and racially biased manner.
The court reviewed extensive statistical evidence showing that Black defendants in Washington were significantly more likely to receive a death sentence than white defendants accused of comparable crimes. The ruling converted all existing death sentences to life without parole.
This was a landmark decision. It was one of the first times a state's highest court struck down the death penalty based specifically on evidence of racial bias in its application.
Legislative Abolition (2023)
While Gregory effectively ended the death penalty in practice, the formal statutory abolition came in 2023 when the Washington State Legislature passed legislation removing the death penalty from state law. Governor Jay Inslee signed the bill, cementing the judicial decision into statutory code.
Governor Inslee had already imposed a moratorium on executions in 2014, meaning no executions had been carried out since 2010.
Washington's last execution took place on September 10, 2010, when Cal Coburn Brown was put to death by lethal injection for the 1991 kidnapping, rape, and murder of Holly Washa.
Notable Life Sentence Cases in Washington
State v. Gregory (2018)
Allen Eugene Gregory was convicted of first-degree aggravated murder and sentenced to death for the 1996 rape and murder of Geneine Harshfield in Tacoma. His case became the vehicle through which the Washington Supreme Court struck down the death penalty. Gregory's sentence was commuted to life without parole. The statistical analysis presented in his case demonstrated racial disparities in death sentencing that the court found violated the state constitution's prohibition on cruel punishment.
Gary Ridgway: The Green River Killer
Gary Ridgway confessed to 49 murders, later admitting to as many as 71, making him one of the most prolific serial killers in American history. In 2003, he pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and was sentenced to 48 consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole. He later pleaded guilty to a 49th murder in 2011.
Ridgway avoided the death penalty through a plea agreement in which he agreed to provide information about the locations of his victims' remains. The case generated significant debate about the use of plea bargaining in capital cases.
Robert Lee Yates Jr.
Robert Lee Yates Jr. was convicted by a Pierce County jury in 2002 of two counts of aggravated first-degree murder and sentenced to death. He had also pleaded guilty in Spokane County to 13 counts of first-degree murder in a separate proceeding. Following State v. Gregory, his death sentence was commuted to life without parole.
Recent Legislative Changes
| Year | Change |
|---|---|
| 2023 | Death penalty formally abolished by legislature |
| 2018 | State Supreme Court strikes down death penalty as racially biased (State v. Gregory) |
| 2014 | Governor Inslee imposes moratorium on executions |
| 2010 | Last execution carried out (Cal Coburn Brown) |
| 2005 | Reforms to juvenile sentencing began |
Washington has continued to pursue criminal justice reforms beyond death penalty abolition, including sentence reduction programs, expanded earned early release, and increased investment in reentry services.
Juvenile Life Sentences
Washington has been at the forefront of juvenile sentencing reform.
No JLWOP: Washington does not impose life without parole on juvenile offenders. Under RCW 10.95.030(2), a person convicted of aggravated first-degree murder for an offense committed before age 18 is sentenced to a maximum term of life with a minimum term of at least 25 years, and RCW 10.95.035 returns anyone sentenced to juvenile life without parole before June 1, 2014, to the sentencing court for resentencing. In State v. Bassett (2018), the Washington Supreme Court held that sentencing juvenile offenders to life without parole or early release is cruel punishment under article I, section 14 of the state constitution.
Miller compliance: Following Miller v. Alabama (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016), Washington conducted resentencing hearings for juveniles who had been sentenced to mandatory LWOP. The state went further than the federal constitutional minimum: State v. Bassett (2018) barred JLWOP entirely under the state constitution.
Juvenile resentencing: Washington's courts have been receptive to resentencing petitions from juvenile offenders, taking into account the scientific research on adolescent brain development, the diminished culpability of youth, and the potential for rehabilitation.
Early release eligibility: Juvenile offenders sentenced to long terms in Washington may petition for early release after serving a specified minimum period, with the court considering factors including maturity, rehabilitation, and risk to the community.
Historical Context
Washington's approach to criminal punishment has evolved significantly over the past century.
Early history: Washington became a state in 1889 and initially imposed the death penalty for first-degree murder. The state used hanging as its execution method for decades.
Sentencing Reform Act (1984): Washington was one of the first states to adopt determinate sentencing guidelines, replacing the old indeterminate system where judges set broad ranges and parole boards decided actual release dates. The SRA was designed to promote consistency and transparency in sentencing.
Three Strikes law: Washington voters approved the "Three Strikes, You're Out" initiative in 1993, mandating life without parole for offenders convicted of three separate "most serious offenses." This law significantly increased the number of LWOP inmates in the state.
Modern reform era: Beginning in the 2010s, Washington shifted toward reform-oriented criminal justice policy. Juvenile sentencing reform, the death penalty moratorium and eventual abolition, expanded reentry programs, and efforts to address racial disparities in the criminal justice system reflect this ongoing shift.
Prison population: The Washington State Department of Corrections houses approximately 15,000 inmates. The state's incarceration rate has been declining in recent years, reflecting both sentencing reforms and changes in crime rates.
Washington Life Sentence at a Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Life with parole | Available for some offenses; determined by sentencing guidelines |
| LWOP available | Yes (aggravated first-degree murder; three strikes) |
| Death penalty | Abolished 2023 (struck down by court 2018) |
| Last execution | September 10, 2010 (Cal Coburn Brown) |
| Juvenile LWOP | Effectively banned |
| Parole system | Abolished 1984 (Sentencing Reform Act); ISRB handles pre-1984 cases |
| Other release paths | Juvenile-only 20-year ISRB petition (RCW 9.94A.730); prosecutor-initiated resentencing (RCW 36.27.130, 2020 SB 6164) |
| Key statutes | RCW 9A.32.030, 9A.32.050, 10.95.020, 10.95.030 |
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is a life sentence in Washington State?
It depends on the conviction. Aggravated first-degree murder and a third strike under the Three Strikes law both carry mandatory life without parole (LWOP). Other murder convictions typically result in determinate sentences under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act, with the specific term based on the offender's criminal history score. Washington does not have a general inmate-initiated reentry review program; the narrower release paths are a juvenile-only 20-year petition to the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (RCW 9.94A.730) and prosecutor-initiated resentencing under RCW 36.27.130 (2020's SB 6164).
Does Washington State have the death penalty?
No. The Washington Supreme Court struck down the death penalty as racially biased in State v. Gregory (2018), and the legislature formally abolished it in 2023. The last execution in Washington was carried out in 2010.
What was State v. Gregory?
State v. Gregory (2018) was a landmark Washington Supreme Court decision that unanimously struck down the state's death penalty as unconstitutional. The court found that the death penalty was applied in a racially arbitrary manner, with Black defendants significantly more likely to receive death sentences than white defendants for comparable crimes.
Can a juvenile get life without parole in Washington?
No. Washington has effectively banned juvenile life without parole. Juvenile offenders convicted of serious crimes receive individualized sentencing and are eligible for eventual release consideration. In State v. Bassett (2018), the Washington Supreme Court went beyond the minimum requirements of Miller v. Alabama (2012) by holding juvenile life without parole unconstitutional under the state constitution.
What is the Three Strikes law in Washington?
Washington voters approved a Three Strikes law in 1993 that mandates life without parole for offenders convicted of three separate 'most serious offenses.' This law applies regardless of the specific sentences for each individual offense and has significantly increased the number of LWOP inmates in the state.
Updates
Punctuation restored where an automated edit had produced comma splices.
Corrected the statute that imposes life without parole for aggravated first-degree murder (RCW 10.95.030), the earned-release limits that apply to murder sentences, and the county details of the Robert Yates case, and added Washington's juvenile sentencing statutes and State v. Bassett (2018).
Removed a fabricated 'Prisoner Initiated Reentry' program (no such program exists in Washington law) and replaced it with the two real, much narrower release mechanisms: a juvenile-only 20-year petition to the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (RCW 9.94A.730) and prosecutor-initiated resentencing (RCW 36.27.130). Also corrected a self-contradiction claiming aggravated first-degree murder is the only charge carrying mandatory LWOP, when the page's own Three Strikes discussion says otherwise.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Code of Washington
§ 10.95.030Sentences for aggravated first degree murder.In force
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, any person convicted of the crime of aggravated first degree murder shall be sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of release or parole. A person sentenced to life imprisonment under this section shall not have that sentence suspended, deferred, or commuted by any judicial officer and the indeterminate sentence review board or its successor may not parole such prisoner nor reduce the period of confinement in any manner whatsoever including but not limited to any sort of good time calculation. The department of social and health services or its successor or any executive official may not permit such prisoner to participate in any sort of release or furlough program. (2)(a)(i) Any person convicted of the crime of aggravated first degree murder for an offense committed prior to the person's 16th birthday shall be sentenced to a maximum term of life imprisonment and a minimum term of total confinement of 25 years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 10.95.020Definition.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
A person is guilty of aggravated first degree murder, a class A felony, if he or she commits first degree murder as defined by RCW 9A.32.030(1)(a), as now or hereafter amended, and one or more of the following aggravating circumstances exist: (1) The victim was a law enforcement officer, corrections officer, or firefighter who was performing his or her official duties at the time of the act resulting in death and the victim was known or reasonably should have been known by the person to be such at the time of the killing; (2) At the time of the act resulting in the death, the person was serving a term of imprisonment, had escaped, or was on authorized or unauthorized leave in or from a state facility or program for the incarceration or treatment of persons adjudicated guilty of crimes; (3) At the time of the act resulting in death, the person was in custody in a county or county-city jail as a consequence of having been adjudicated guilty of a felony; (4) The person committed the murder pursuant to an agreement that he or she would receive money or any other thing of value for committing the murder; (5) The person solicited another person to commit the murder and had paid or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 181 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Guloy (Washington Supreme Court 1985, 104 Wash. 2d 412)“…application of the aggravated first degree murder statute, RCW 10.95.020. The statute provides in pertinent part…”
- State v. Brown (Washington Supreme Court 1997, 132 Wash. 2d 529)“…dividualized determination and appellate review. 276 Under RCW 10.95.020 the jurors consider statutory aggravati…”
- State v. Pirtle (Washington Supreme Court 1995, 127 Wash. 2d 628)“…the structure of RCW 10.95. To define first degree murder, RCW 10.95.020 refers specifically to the definition o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Murder Sentencing Guidelines: Min & Max Prison Time by State (2026)
§ 9A.32.030Murder in the first degree.In force
(1) A person is guilty of murder in the first degree when: (a) With a premeditated intent to cause the death of another person, he or she causes the death of such person or of a third person; or (b) Under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to human life, he or she engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to any person, and thereby causes the death of a person; or (c) He or she commits or attempts to commit the crime of either (1) robbery in the first or second degree, (2) rape in the first or second degree, (3) burglary in the first degree, (4) arson in the first or second degree, or (5) kidnapping in the first or second degree, and in the course of or in furtherance of such crime or in immediate flight therefrom, he or she, or another participant, causes the death of a person other than one of the participants: Except that in any prosecution under this subdivision (1)(c) in which the defendant was not the only participant in the underlying crime, if established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence, it is a defense that the defendant: (i) Did not commit the homicidal act or in any way solicit, request, command, importune, cause, or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 503 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Hoffman (Washington Supreme Court 1991, 116 Wash. 2d 51)“…nt from the element of intent required under RCW 10.95.020. RCW 9A.32.030(1)(a) (incorporated in RCW 10.95.020) r…”
- State v. Brett (Washington Supreme Court 1995, 126 Wash. 2d 136)“…rder if he or she commits first degree murder as defined by RCW 9A.32.030(1)(a) ... and one or more of the follow…”
- Matter of Personal Restraint of Lord (Washington Supreme Court 1994, 123 Wash. 2d 296)“…on of first degree felony murder includes attempted crimes (RCW 9A.32.030(1)(c)), whereas the aggravating factor…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9A.32.050Murder in the second degree.In force
(1) A person is guilty of murder in the second degree when: (a) With intent to cause the death of another person but without premeditation, he or she causes the death of such person or of a third person; or (b) He or she commits or attempts to commit any felony, including assault, other than those enumerated in RCW 9A.32.030(1)(c), and, in the course of and in furtherance of such crime or in immediate flight therefrom, he or she, or another participant, causes the death of a person other than one of the participants; except that in any prosecution under this subdivision (1)(b) in which the defendant was not the only participant in the underlying crime, if established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence, it is a defense that the defendant: (i) Did not commit the homicidal act or in any way solicit, request, command, importune, cause, or aid the commission thereof; and (ii) Was not armed with a deadly weapon, or any instrument, article, or substance readily capable of causing death or serious physical injury; and (iii) Had no reasonable grounds to believe that any other participant was armed with such a weapon, instrument, article, or substance; and (iv) Had no…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 277 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Berlin (Washington Supreme Court 1997, 133 Wash. 2d 541)“…he alternative means of intentional murder, in violation of RCW 9A.32.050(l)(a), and felony murder with assault i…”
- State v. Crane (Washington Supreme Court 1991, 116 Wash. 2d 315)“…uently charged with one count of second degree murder under RCW 9A.32.050(1)(b) and two counts of second degree a…”
- In re the Personal Restraint of Andress (Washington Supreme Court 2002, 147 Wash. 2d 602)“…se enumerated in [the first degree felony murder statute].” RCW 9A.32.050(l)(b) (emphasis added). The Legislature…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9A.32.060Manslaughter in the first degree.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when: (a) He or she recklessly causes the death of another person; or (b) He or she intentionally and unlawfully kills an unborn quick child by inflicting any injury upon the mother of such child. (2) Manslaughter in the first degree is a class A felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 128 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Berlin (Washington Supreme Court 1997, 133 Wash. 2d 541)“…he defendant recklessly causes the death of another person. RCW 9A.32.060(l)(a). The elements of manslaughter in…”
- State v. Dennison (Washington Supreme Court 1990, 115 Wash. 2d 609)“…v. Roybal, 82 Wn.2d 577, 583 , 512 P.2d 718 (1973); RCW 9A.32.060, .070. Likewise, second degree murder,…”
- In Re the Personal Restraint of Montoya (Washington Supreme Court 1987, 109 Wash. 2d 270)“…which charged Montoya with first degree manslaughter under RCW 9A.32.060(l)(a) and stated that the maximum penal…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Manslaughter in Washington: Degrees, Sentences and Vehicular Homicide
§ 9.94A.730Early release for persons convicted of one or more crimes committed prior to 18th birthday—Petition to indeterminate sentence review board—Conditions—Assessment, programming, and services—Examination—Hearing—Supervision—Denial of petition.In force
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any person convicted of one or more crimes committed prior to the person's 18th birthday may petition the indeterminate sentence review board for early release after serving no less than 20 years of total confinement, provided the person has not been convicted for any crime committed subsequent to the person's 18th birthday, the person has not committed a disqualifying serious infraction as defined by the department in the 12 months prior to filing the petition for early release, and the current sentence was not imposed under RCW 10.95.030 or 9.94A.507. (2) No later than five years prior to the date the offender will be eligible to petition for release, the department shall conduct an assessment of the offender and identify programming and services that would be appropriate to prepare the offender for return to the community. To the extent possible, the department shall make programming available as identified by the assessment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 52 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Houston-Sconiers (Washington Supreme Court 2017)“…years. See LAWS OF 2014, ch. 130, § 10 (codified at RCW 9.94A.730). The following year, the legislature…”
- State v. Ramos (Washington Supreme Court 2017, 187 Wash. 2d 420)“…After Ramos' second resentencing, our legislature enacted RCW 9.94A.730 in response to the ever-evolvin…”
- In re Pers. Restraint of Ali (Washington Supreme Court 2020, 196 Wash. 2d 220)“…State argues that Washington’s Miller-fix statute, RCW 9.94A.730, is an adequate remedy because…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 36.27.130Felony resentencing.In force
(1) The prosecutor of a county in which an offender was sentenced for a felony offense may petition the sentencing court or the sentencing court's successor to resentence the offender if the original sentence no longer advances the interests of justice. (2) The court may grant or deny a petition under this section. If the court grants a petition, the court shall resentence the defendant in the same manner as if the offender had not previously been sentenced, provided the new sentence, if any, is no greater than the initial sentence. (3) The court may consider postconviction factors including, but not limited to, the inmate's disciplinary record and record of rehabilitation while incarcerated; evidence that reflects whether age, time served, and diminished physical condition, if any, have reduced the inmate's risk for future violence; and evidence that reflects changed circumstances since the inmate's original sentencing such that the inmate's continued incarceration no longer serves the interests of justice. Credit shall be given for time served.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Washington v. Anthony Laurence Wright (Court of Appeals of Washington 2021, 493 P.3d 1220)“…Wright’s second argument that the law has evolved points to RCW 36.27.130, a recently enacted provision that aut…”
- State Of Washington, V. Sheryl Martin (Court of Appeals of Washington 2024, 548 P.3d 210)“…ial court’s denial of her motion for resentencing based on RCW 36.27.130. RCW 36.27.130(1) states that…”
- State Of Washington, V. Ryan Erker (Court of Appeals of Washington 2025)“…CPAO) to petition the trial court to resentence them under RCW 36.27.130, asserting that their original sentenc…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 10.95.035Return of persons to sentencing court if sentenced prior to June 1, 2014, under this chapter or any prior law, for a term of life without the possibility of parole for an offense committed prior to 18th birthday.In force
(1) A person, who was sentenced prior to June 1, 2014, under this chapter or any prior law, to a term of life without the possibility of parole for an offense committed prior to their eighteenth birthday, shall be returned to the sentencing court or the sentencing court's successor for sentencing consistent with RCW 10.95.030. Release and supervision of a person who receives a minimum term of less than life will be governed by RCW 10.95.030. (2) The court shall provide an opportunity for victims and survivors of victims of any crimes for which the offender has been convicted to present a statement personally or by representation. (3) A resentencing under this section shall not reopen the defendant's conviction to challenges that would otherwise be barred by RCW 10.73.090, 10.73.100, 10.73.140, or other procedural barriers.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 40 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Delbosque (Washington Supreme Court 2020, 195 Wash. 2d 106)“…ithout parole sentences for aggravated first degree murder. RCW 10.95.035(1) provides that juveniles who received…”
- State v. Haag (Washington Supreme Court 2021, 495 P.3d 241)“…under our Miller-fix statutes, RCW 10.95.030(3) and RCW 10.95.035. Two expert witnesses, Dr. Marty Beyer…”
- State Of Washington v. Brian M. Bassett (Court of Appeals of Washington 2017, 198 Wash. App. 714)“…L. Ed. 2d 407 (2012). 2 In 2014, the legislature enacted RCW 10.95.035(1), requiring that persons sentenced “p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- RCW 10.95.020(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9A.32.030(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9A.32.050(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9A.32.060(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- ISRB(doc.wa.gov).gov
- Washington State Clemency and Pardons Board(governor.wa.gov).gov
- *State v. Gregory*(courts.wa.gov).gov
- *Miller v. Alabama*(law.cornell.edu).gov
- *Montgomery v. Louisiana*(supremecourt.gov).gov
- RCW 9.94A.730(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 36.27.130(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 10.95.030 - Sentences for aggravated first degree murder(app.leg.wa.gov)
- RCW 10.95.035 - Return to sentencing court of persons sentenced to life without parole for offenses committed before age 18(app.leg.wa.gov)
- RCW 9.94A.729 - Earned release time(app.leg.wa.gov)
- RCW 9.94A.540 - Mandatory minimum terms(app.leg.wa.gov)
- State v. Bassett, No. 94556-0 (Wash. 2018)(courts.wa.gov)