New York
Wrongful Termination in New York (2026): Laws, Deadlines, How to File
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 10, 2026). · 23 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New York is an at-will employment state, so a firing is wrongful only when it breaks a specific law or an express term of an employment contract. The main state law is the New York State Human Rights Law, which makes it unlawful for any employer in the state, regardless of size, to fire someone because of a protected characteristic such as age, race, sex, disability, sexual orientation or gender identity (N.Y. Executive Law 296(1)(a)).
New York's highest court refused to create a general lawsuit for firing in violation of public policy, so claims rest on statutes: the Human Rights Law, the whistleblower law in Labor Law 740, the anti-retaliation rule in Labor Law 215 and the off-duty conduct law in Labor Law 201-d, among others. A complaint to the state Division of Human Rights is now due within three years. For other states, see our guide to wrongful termination laws by state.
Information last verified on October 10, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers New York State law on wrongful termination of private-sector employees: the Human Rights Law (Executive Law article 15), Labor Law 195, 196-b, 201-d, 215 and 740, Judiciary Law 519 and Election Law 3-110, with short notes on the federal laws that apply in New York. The full federal rules are on our wrongful termination laws by state guide. It does not cover the separate New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code 8-107), which also applies to people who work in New York City. It does not cover severance pay or what a release can waive; see New York severance pay laws.
Is New York an at-will state?
Yes. In Murphy v. American Home Products Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 293 (1983), the New York Court of Appeals held that "absent a constitutionally impermissible purpose, a statutory proscription, or an express limitation in the individual contract of employment, an employer's right at any time to terminate an employment at will remains unimpaired." See New York at-will employment laws for the doctrine itself.
That sentence is also the map for this page: a New York firing is wrongful when it violates a statute or an express contract term, not simply because it was unfair.
Grounds for a wrongful termination claim in New York
Discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law
The Human Rights Law reaches every employer: "The term 'employer' shall include all employers within the state" (Executive Law 292(5)). Section 296(1)(a) makes it an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer:
"because of an individual's age, race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status, marital status, or status as a victim of domestic violence, to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge from employment such individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment."
Other subdivisions of section 296 add further protections, such as section 296(15) on criminal convictions. Section 300 directs that the law be "construed liberally for the accomplishment of the remedial purposes thereof, regardless of whether federal civil rights laws, including those laws with provisions worded comparably to the provisions of this article, have been so construed."
Two 2025 amendments widened the law. Chapter 706 of the Laws of 2025 (S8338, signed December 19, 2025, effective immediately) lets an employment discrimination claim succeed on a practice's discriminatory effect, even without intent, unless the practice has a legally sufficient justification (Executive Law 296(5-b)); it applies to employment discrimination occurring on and after its effective date. A practice is justified only if it is job related and consistent with business necessity and no practice with a less discriminatory effect could serve that need. Chapter 600 of 2025 is covered under retaliation below.
Federal law overlaps but reaches fewer employers: Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees (42 U.S.C. 2000e(b)). Because the state law has no size limit, a worker at a very small business may have a state claim with no federal counterpart.
Retaliation for opposing discrimination or requesting an accommodation
Executive Law 296(7) makes it unlawful to retaliate against a person who opposed practices the Human Rights Law forbids, filed a complaint, testified or assisted in a proceeding, or requested a reasonable accommodation. The accommodation-request clause came from chapter 600 of the Laws of 2025 (S3398, signed December 5, 2025), which took effect immediately and applies to all actions filed on or after that date.
Whistleblowing: Labor Law 740
Labor Law 740 covers any employer with one or more employees, and "employee" includes former employees and independent contractors (740(1)). It bars retaliatory action, including firing, suspension, demotion and threats to report immigration status, because an employee:
- discloses or threatens to disclose to a supervisor or a public body an activity, policy or practice the employee reasonably believes violates a law, rule or regulation, or poses a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety;
- provides information to or testifies before a public body; or
- objects to or refuses to participate in such an activity, policy or practice (740(2)).
Before disclosing to a public body, the employee must make a good-faith effort to notify the employer, except in circumstances the statute lists (740(3)). Suit is due "within two years after the alleged retaliatory action was taken" (740(4)(a)), and a jury trial is available. For more, see New York whistleblower laws.
Complaints about pay or other Labor Law violations: Labor Law 215
Labor Law 215 bars firing or retaliating against an employee who complained, to the employer, the labor commissioner, the attorney general or any other person, about conduct the employee reasonably and in good faith believed violates the Labor Law. It also protects employees who started or are about to start a proceeding, provided information, testified, otherwise exercised Labor Law rights, or used any legally protected absence under federal, state or local law (215(1)(a)).
The sick leave law adds its own anti-retaliation rule for requesting and using sick leave or paid prenatal leave, enforced consistent with section 215 (Labor Law 196-b(7)).
Off-duty conduct, cannabis and captive-audience meetings: Labor Law 201-d
Labor Law 201-d(2) makes it unlawful to fire or discriminate against an employee because of:
- legal political activities outside working hours, off the employer's premises and without its equipment;
- legal use of consumable products, "including cannabis in accordance with state law," under the same conditions;
- legal recreational activities outside working hours;
- union membership or exercise of rights under federal labor law or the Taylor Law; or
- refusing to attend or listen to an employer meeting whose primary purpose is to share the employer's opinion on religious or political matters.
Section 201-d(3) carves out conduct that creates a material conflict of interest with the employer's trade secrets or proprietary interests, among other exceptions. For cannabis, section 201-d(4-a) also lets an employer act when the employee shows specific articulable symptoms of impairment while working, or when a state or federal mandate, federal law, or a federal contract or funding requires it. An aggrieved employee "may commence an action for equitable relief and damages" (201-d(7)(b)), and the attorney general can seek an injunction and civil penalties of $300 for a first violation and $500 for each later one (201-d(7)(a)).
Jury service, voting and military status
- Jury service: a summoned juror who notifies the employer before the term of service begins "shall not, on account of absence from employment by reason of such jury service, be subject to discharge or penalty" (Judiciary Law 519). A violation is criminal contempt of court; the section has no private damages clause. An employer may withhold wages during service, but one with more than ten employees may not withhold the first $72 of daily wages for the first three days.
- Voting: a registered voter without enough time outside working hours may take up to two hours off without loss of pay, after notifying the employer not more than ten and not less than two working days before the election (Election Law 3-110). That section contains no express ban on firing and no remedy.
- Military status: firing because of military status is unlawful under Executive Law 296(1)(a), so it follows the Human Rights Law process and deadlines.
Workers' compensation claims
Workers' Compensation Law section 120 makes it unlawful to fire or otherwise discriminate against an employee for claiming or attempting to claim workers' compensation or other benefits under that law, requesting a claim form, or testifying in a proceeding under it, when no other valid reason is shown. A complaint must be filed within two years. If the Workers' Compensation Board finds a violation, it orders the employee restored to employment or to the position the employee would have had and compensated for lost pay, plus attorney fees the Board sets; the employer also pays a penalty of $100 to $500 to the state. For the benefits side, see New York workers' compensation laws.
Employee handbooks and employment contracts
A handbook can limit firing in New York only through an express promise. In Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 57 N.Y.2d 458 (1982), the employer's handbook said it would dismiss "for just and sufficient cause only," the employment application incorporated the handbook, and the employer's representative assured the new hire of that job security. Murphy later described Weiner as holding that, on an appropriate evidentiary showing, a limitation on the right to fire "might be imported from an express provision therefor found in the employer's handbook on personnel policies."
A handbook without such an express limit, or one with a disclaimer, is a different case. A breach of contract claim has six years (CPLR 213(2)).
No public-policy tort and no implied good-faith limit
In Murphy, an employee fired after disclosing accounting improprieties asked the court to recognize a tort of abusive or wrongful discharge. The Court of Appeals refused, holding that whether employers should be liable to at-will employees in circumstances where no liability existed at common law is "better left to resolution at the hands of the Legislature." The court also refused to imply a duty of good faith that would limit the employer's "unfettered right to terminate" an at-will employee. The Court of Appeals later carved out a narrow exception in Wieder v. Skala, 80 N.Y.2d 628 (1992): a law-firm associate fired for insisting on reporting another lawyer's misconduct, as the profession's rules required, stated a breach of contract claim based on an implied-in-law obligation.
Constructive discharge in New York
New York courts recognize a constructive discharge when an employer, "rather than discharging the plaintiff directly, deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign." The Appellate Division, Second Department, applied that standard to Human Rights Law claims in Blackman v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2022 NY Slip Op 03490 (2d Dep't June 1, 2022).

Wrongful termination deadlines in New York
| Claim | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Human Rights Law complaint with the Division of Human Rights | 3 years after the discriminatory practice (acts on or after February 15, 2024) | Executive Law 297(5) |
| Human Rights Law lawsuit in court | 3 years (Murphy v. American Home Products Corp., N.Y. 1983) | CPLR 214(2) |
| Federal EEOC charge | 300 days in New York (employers with 15 or more employees; 20 or more for age) | EEOC New York District Office, Timeliness |
| Title VII lawsuit | 90 days after the EEOC Notice of Right to Sue | 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) |
| Whistleblower lawsuit | 2 years after the retaliatory action | Labor Law 740(4)(a) |
| Labor Law retaliation lawsuit (including sick leave) | 2 years after the violation, tolled while a complaint to the labor commissioner is pending; notice of the suit must be served on the attorney general at or before filing | Labor Law 215(2)(a), (b), 196-b(7) |
| Workers' compensation retaliation (complaint decided by the Workers' Compensation Board) | 2 years | Workers' Compensation Law 120 |
| Off-duty conduct lawsuit | No deadline stated in the section; get advice promptly | Labor Law 201-d |
| Breach of an employment contract | 6 years | CPLR 213(2) |

The Division of Human Rights says that for discrimination before February 15, 2024, the filing period depends on the type of claim. Because the state period is now three years, the federal EEOC deadline is the one most likely to run out first.
Other federal clocks are short too: an OSHA safety-retaliation complaint is due within 30 days (29 U.S.C. 660(c)(2)), a National Labor Relations Board charge within six months (29 U.S.C. 160(b)), and a federal family-leave lawsuit within 2 years, or 3 if the violation was willful (29 U.S.C. 2617(c)).
How to file a discrimination complaint in New York
- Choose between the Division of Human Rights and court. The Human Rights Law requires no agency filing and no right-to-sue letter before a lawsuit. But the choice is exclusive: a person who files a complaint with the Division, or with a local human rights commission such as New York City's, cannot sue on the same grievance unless the Division dismisses it for administrative convenience or untimeliness or the election is annulled, and a person who has sued cannot then file with the Division (Executive Law 297(9)).
- File with the Division within three years. Complaints go through the Division's file a complaint page.
- Know how a federal charge interacts. Under section 297(9), a complaint the EEOC files to meet its own federal duties does not count as your election to file with the Division.
- Consider the federal route separately. The EEOC asks people to start through its EEOC Public Portal and to call 1-800-669-4000 if a deadline is near.
What you can recover under the Human Rights Law
The Division of Human Rights may order reinstatement "with or without back pay" and award compensatory damages (Executive Law 297(4)(c)). A court action is one "for damages" and "such other remedies as may be appropriate" (297(9)). The text we read sets no cap on compensatory damages.
Punitive damages are available "in cases of employment discrimination related to private employers," both in court (297(9)) and from the Division (297(4)(c)(iv)); the statute's $10,000 limit on punitive damages applies to housing cases, not employment. The Division can also impose civil fines and penalties of up to $50,000, or up to $100,000 for a willful, wanton or malicious act, which are paid to the state, not the employee (297(4)(c)(vi)). Under section 297(10), "the commissioner or the court may in its discretion award reasonable attorney's fees to any prevailing or substantially prevailing party," plus expert fees; an employer that prevails must show the case was frivolous.
Under Labor Law 740(5), a court may order reinstatement or front pay instead, restored benefits and seniority, lost wages, costs and attorney's fees, a civil penalty of up to $10,000, and punitive damages "if the violation was willful, malicious or wanton." Under Labor Law 215, the court may order rehiring or front pay, lost compensation and damages, costs and attorneys' fees, and must award liquidated damages of "not more than twenty thousand dollars"; the labor commissioner may also assess a civil penalty of $1,000 to $10,000, or up to $20,000 for a repeat violation within six years.
Federal Title VII caps combined compensatory and punitive damages at $50,000 to $300,000 depending on employer size (42 U.S.C. 1981a(b)(3)); see the wrongful termination guide for the tiers.
Does a New York employer have to explain a firing?
No statute we found requires a private employer to give a reason. Labor Law 195(6) does require written notice of the dates: the employer must "notify any employee terminated from employment, in writing, of the exact date of such termination as well as the exact date of cancellation of employee benefits connected with such termination," and "In no case shall notice of such termination be provided more than five working days after the date of such termination." Failing to give notice of the cancellation of accident or health insurance carries a penalty under Labor Law 217.
Chapter 293 of the Laws of 2026 (S3460), signed September 9, 2026, adds Labor Law section 210-b on access to personnel records. The act takes effect 60 days after it became law on September 9, 2026. As passed, section 210-b requires an employer that receives a written request from a current or former employee to provide a copy of that employee's personnel record at no cost within five business days, bars firing or retaliating against an employee for exercising these rights, and is enforced by the attorney general with fines of $500 to $2,500 per violation. The signing entry references an approval memo, so a later chapter amendment may change these details; check the current text before relying on them.
Practical steps after a firing in New York
Write down the firing date, who made the decision, the reason given and any complaints, leave or accommodation requests that came before it, and keep emails, texts, reviews and the Labor Law 195(6) notice. Decide deliberately between the Division of Human Rights and court, because filing with the Division can close the court route (Executive Law 297(9)).
If you are offered money in exchange for a release, read it before signing; it can give up the claims on this page. Our New York severance pay laws page covers what those agreements can include.
New York law changes and pending bills
- Three-year filing period (effective February 15, 2024): the Division of Human Rights complaint period for all discrimination rose from one year to three years for acts on or after that date (Executive Law 297(5)).
- Chapter 600 of 2025 (S3398), signed December 5, 2025: retaliation for requesting a reasonable accommodation is unlawful under Executive Law 296(7); applies to actions filed on or after that date.
- Chapter 706 of 2025 (S8338), signed December 19, 2025: disparate-impact liability in employment discrimination cases occurring on and after that date.
- S4424-A, Anti-Waiver of Employment Rights Act (pending): would make Labor Law and Human Rights Law rights non-waivable by private agreement and bar contracts that shorten limitations periods. It passed the Senate on February 25, 2026 (47-11), and the Assembly passed it and returned it to the Senate on May 13, 2026. As of October 10, 2026, the Senate's bill page showed no delivery to the governor or signature. It is not law.
- Chapter 293 of 2026 (S3460), signed September 9, 2026: adds Labor Law 210-b on access to personnel records; it takes effect 60 days after it became law, and a chapter amendment may change its details. See above.
Related
- Wrongful termination laws by state
- New York at-will employment laws
- New York whistleblower laws
- New York severance pay laws
- New York workers' compensation laws
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about New York State wrongful termination law (the Human Rights Law in Executive Law article 15 and the Labor Law provisions named above) and the federal laws that apply in New York. It is not legal advice. The information was verified on October 10, 2026. For advice about your situation, contact the New York State Division of Human Rights, a legal aid office or a lawyer licensed in New York.
Last updated: October 10, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue for wrongful termination in New York?
Generally only if the firing violated a statute or an express term of your employment contract, because New York is at-will and its highest court refused to create a public-policy discharge tort (Murphy v. American Home Products Corp., 1983). The main statutes are the Human Rights Law (Executive Law 296) and Labor Law 740, 215 and 201-d.
How long do I have to file a discrimination complaint in New York?
Three years after the discriminatory act, for acts on or after February 15, 2024, with the New York State Division of Human Rights (Executive Law 297(5)). The federal EEOC deadline in New York is 300 days (for employers with 15 or more employees, or 20 or more for age claims), so it usually runs out first.
Does the New York Human Rights Law apply to small employers?
Yes. Executive Law 292(5) says the term employer includes all employers within the state, so there is no minimum number of employees.
Do I need a right-to-sue letter to sue under New York law?
No. The Human Rights Law requires no agency filing before a lawsuit, but filing a complaint with the Division of Human Rights generally bars a later court suit on the same grievance (Executive Law 297(9)).
Is there a cap on damages for discrimination in New York?
The Human Rights Law text sets no cap on compensatory damages, and punitive damages are available in employment cases against private employers (Executive Law 297(9)). The statute's $10,000 punitive limit applies only to housing cases.
How long do I have to sue for whistleblower retaliation in New York?
Two years after the retaliatory action under Labor Law 740(4)(a). The law covers employers with one or more employees and protects disclosures of practices the employee reasonably believes violate a law.
Can I be fired in New York for using cannabis off duty?
Labor Law 201-d(2) bars firing for legal use of consumable products, including cannabis in accordance with state law, outside working hours, off the employer's premises and without its equipment. An employer may still act if the employee shows specific articulable symptoms of cannabis impairment while working, or if a state or federal mandate, federal law, or a federal contract or funding requires it (201-d(4-a)); section 201-d(3) adds other exceptions, such as a material conflict of interest.
Does my employer have to tell me why I was fired in New York?
No statute we found requires a reason. Labor Law 195(6) requires written notice of the exact termination date and the date benefits end, no more than five working days after the firing.
Can I be fired in New York for complaining about unpaid wages?
No. Labor Law 215 bars retaliation for complaining about conduct you reasonably and in good faith believe violates the Labor Law, and a lawsuit is due within two years (215(2)(a)).
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New York Executive Law
§ 296Unlawful discriminatory practicesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Unlawful discriminatory practices. 1. It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice: (a) For an employer or licensing agency, because of an individual's age, race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status, marital status, or status as a victim of domestic violence, to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge from employment such individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment. (b) For an employment agency to discriminate against any individual because of age, race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status, marital status, or status as a victim of domestic violence, in receiving, classifying, disposing or otherwise acting upon applications for its services or in referring an applicant or applicants to an employer or employers.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 3,468 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the Blind (New York Court of Appeals 2004, 3 N.Y.3d 295)“…and to defeat summary judgment. *316 Forrest sues under Executive Law § 296 (1) (a) 1 and Administrative Code of t…”
- Williams v. New York City Housing Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2009, 61 A.D.3d 62)“…troduction that “This is an action pursuant to the New York Executive Law §§ 296 (a) (1) [sic], (6), (7) and New York Ci…”
- Johnson v. North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2016, 137 A.D.3d 977)“…retaliation, and a hostile work environment in violation of Executive Law § 296, the plaintiff appeals from an order of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New York Background Check Laws (2026 Guide), Renting Without a Social Security Number in the U.S. (2026)
§ 297ProcedureIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Procedure. 1. Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice may, by himself or herself or his or her attorney-at-law, make, sign and file with the division a complaint in writing under oath or by declaration which shall state the name and address of the person alleged to have committed the unlawful discriminatory practice complained of and which shall set forth the particulars thereof and contain such other information as may be required by the division. The commissioner of labor or the attorney general, or the executive director of the justice center for the protection of people with special needs, or the division on its own motion may, in like manner, make, sign and file such complaint. In connection with the filing of such complaint, the attorney general is authorized to take proof, issue subpoenas and administer oaths in the manner provided in the civil practice law and rules. Any employer whose employees, or some of them, refuse or threaten to refuse to cooperate with the provisions of this article, may file with the division a verified complaint asking for assistance by conciliation or other remedial action. 2. a.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 678 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd. (New York Court of Appeals 1992, 80 N.Y.2d 490)“…over punitive damages in a court action brought pursuant to Executive Law § 297 (9). Based on our analysis of the statu…”
- Murphy v. Kirkland (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2011, 88 A.D.3d 267)“…spondent after the one-year limitations period set forth in Executive Law § 297 (5) had expired, and after the responde…”
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Division of Human Rights (New York Court of Appeals 1991, 77 N.Y.2d 411)“…probable cause and recommended a public hearing pursuant to Executive Law § 297. After hearings the Administrative Law…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New York At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights
New York Labor Law
§ 740Retaliatory action by employers; prohibitionIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Retaliatory action by employers; prohibition. 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, unless the context specifically indicates otherwise: (a) "Employee" means an individual who performs services for and under the control and direction of an employer for wages or other remuneration, including former employees, or natural persons employed as independent contractors to carry out work in furtherance of an employer's business enterprise who are not themselves employers. (b) "Employer" means any person, firm, partnership, institution, corporation, or association that employs one or more employees. (c) "Law, rule or regulation" includes: (i) any duly enacted federal, state or local statute or ordinance or executive order; (ii) any rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to such statute or ordinance or executive order; or (iii) any judicial or administrative decision, ruling or order.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 349 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Leibowitz v. Bank Leumi Trust Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1989, 152 A.D.2d 169)“…lletta, J. Does a complaint state a cause of action under Labor Law § 740, the so-called "Whistleblowers’ Statute…”
- Horn v. New York Times (New York Court of Appeals 2003, 100 N.Y.2d 85)“…out the Legislature's enactment of the Whistleblower's Law (Labor Law § 740; Civil Service Law § 75-b). Although we…”
- Webb-Weber v. Community Action for Human Services, Inc. (New York Court of Appeals 2014, 23 N.Y.3d 448)“…OPINION OF THE COURT Pigott, J. Labor Law § 740 (2), commonly referred to as the “whist…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New York Workplace Recording Laws: Employee Rights and Employer Rules, New York Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
§ 215Penalties and civil action; prohibited retaliationIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Penalties and civil action; prohibited retaliation. 1. (a) No employer or his or her agent, or the officer or agent of any corporation, partnership, or limited liability company, or any other person, shall discharge, threaten, penalize, or in any other manner discriminate or retaliate against any employee (i) because such employee has made a complaint to his or her employer, or to the commissioner or his or her authorized representative, or to the attorney general or any other person, that the employer has engaged in conduct that the employee, reasonably and in good faith, believes violates any provision of this chapter, or any order issued by the commissioner (ii) because such employer or person believes that such employee has made a complaint to his or her employer, or to the commissioner or his or her authorized representative, or to the attorney general, or to any other person that the employer has violated any provision of this chapter, or any order issued by the commissioner (iii) because such employee has caused to be instituted or is about to institute a proceeding under or related to this chapter, or (iv) because such employee has provided information to the commissioner…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 147 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Epifani v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2009, 65 A.D.3d 224)“…fth cause of action), retaliatory discharge in violation of Labor Law § 215 (sixth cause of action), wrongful wage…”
- Grella v. St. Francis Hospital (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2017, 149 A.D.3d 1046)“…tive Law § 296 [1] [a]), and as retaliation in violation of Labor Law § 215. The second amended complaint alleged t…”
- Tsatskin v. Kordonsky (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2020, 189 A.D.3d 1296)“…o failed to state a cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 215. Under that statute, it is unlawful to…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Employer Threatening to Call Immigration? Your Rights in the U.S., New York Minimum Wage 2026: $17.00 and $16.00 Rates
New York Workers' Compensation Law
§ 120Discrimination against employeesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Discrimination against employees. It shall be unlawful for any employer or his or her duly authorized agent to discharge or fail to reinstate pursuant to section two hundred three-b of this chapter, or in any other manner discriminate against an employee as to his or her employment because such employee has claimed or attempted to claim compensation from such employer, requested a claim form for injuries received in the course of employment, or claimed or attempted to claim any benefits provided under this chapter or because he or she has testified or is about to testify in a proceeding under this chapter and no other valid reason is shown to exist for such action by the employer. Any complaint alleging such an unlawful discriminatory practice must be filed within two years of the commission of such practice.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Greenberg v. New York City Transit Authority (New York Court of Appeals 2006, 7 N.Y.3d 139)“…T R.S. SMITH, J. We hold that an award of damages under Workers' Compensation Law § 120 to an employee who has been discharged…”
- Matter of Fetahaj v. Starbucks Corporation (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2016, 144 A.D.3d 1350)“…at claimant's employment was not terminated in violation of Workers' Compensation Law § 120. In January 2013, claimant and a…”
- Matter of Burke v. New York City Tr. Auth. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2020, 139 N.Y.S.3d 403)“…at claimant's employment was not terminated in violation of Workers' Compensation Law § 120. Claimant worked as a subway train o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- N.Y. Executive Law 296, Unlawful discriminatory practices(nysenate.gov).gov
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 293 (1983)(courtlistener.com)
- New York State Division of Human Rights, news release on the three-year statute of limitations(dhr.ny.gov).gov
- N.Y. Executive Law 297, Procedure(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York State Labor Law 740, Retaliatory action by employers(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York State Labor Law 215, Penalties and civil action; retaliation(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York State Labor Law 195(6), Notice of termination(nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Executive Law 292, Definitions(nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Executive Law 300, Construction(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York Senate, S8338 (2025), chapter 706 of 2025(nysenate.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e, Title VII definitions(law.cornell.edu)
- New York Senate, S3398 (2025), chapter 600 of 2025(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York State Labor Law 196-b, Paid sick leave(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York State Labor Law 201-d, Discrimination against the engagement in certain activities(nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Judiciary Law 519, Jurors; employer protections(nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Election Law 3-110, Time off to vote(nysenate.gov).gov
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 57 N.Y.2d 458 (1982)(courtlistener.com)
- Blackman v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2022 NY Slip Op 03490 (2d Dep't 2022)(courtlistener.com)
- N.Y. Civil Practice Law and Rules 214(nysenate.gov).gov
- U.S. EEOC, Time Limits for Filing a Charge(eeoc.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5, Title VII enforcement provisions(law.cornell.edu)
- New York State Division of Human Rights, File a Complaint(dhr.ny.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. 660, OSH Act section 11(c)(law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 160, Prevention of unfair labor practices(law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 2617, FMLA enforcement(law.cornell.edu)
- U.S. EEOC, How to File a Charge of Employment Discrimination(eeoc.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 1981a, Damages in cases of intentional discrimination(law.cornell.edu)
- New York Senate, S3460 (2025-26) bill text(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York Senate, S4424-A (2025-26) Anti-Waiver of Employment Rights Act(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York Workers' Compensation Law Section 120(nysenate.gov).gov
- New York Senate, S3460 (2025-26), signed as Chapter 293 of 2026(nysenate.gov).gov
- Wieder v. Skala, 80 N.Y.2d 628 (1992)(static.case.law)
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 293 (1983), full text(static.case.law)
- U.S. EEOC New York District Office: Timeliness(www.eeoc.gov).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.