Indiana
Wrongful Termination in Indiana (2026): Laws, Deadlines, How to File
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 10, 2026). · 11 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Indiana is an employment-at-will state, and its courts read the exceptions narrowly, so a firing is wrongful only when it breaks a specific statute or falls within one of a few court-made exceptions. The main state law is the Indiana Civil Rights Law (IC 22-9-1), which treats discrimination in employment because of race, religion, color, sex, disability, national origin, ancestry or status as a veteran as an unlawful discriminatory practice, for employers with six or more employees in Indiana (IC 22-9-1-3(h), (l)).
A complaint under that law must reach the Indiana Civil Rights Commission within 180 days (IC 22-9-1-3(p)), and the law gives no free-standing right to take the employer straight to court. To compare other states, see our guide to wrongful termination laws by state.
Information last verified on October 10, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers Indiana law on firing private-sector employees: the at-will rule and its court-made exceptions, the Indiana Civil Rights Law (IC 22-9-1) and its companion age chapter (IC 22-9-2), and narrower Indiana statutes such as jury-service, workplace-safety and off-duty tobacco protections, with short notes on the federal laws that also apply. The federal rules in full are on our wrongful termination laws by state guide. It does not cover severance agreements; see Indiana severance pay laws.
Is Indiana an at-will state?
Yes, and the presumption is strong. In Baker v. Tremco Inc., 917 N.E.2d 650 (Ind. 2009), the Indiana Supreme Court said it has "recognized only three exceptions" to at-will employment: adequate independent consideration, public policy, and promissory estoppel. For how the doctrine works day to day, see Indiana at-will employment laws.
So after an Indiana firing, the question is whether a statute was broken or the facts fit one of those three narrow exceptions.
Grounds for a wrongful termination claim in Indiana
Discrimination under the Indiana Civil Rights Law
Who is covered. An employer under the Civil Rights Law is the state, its political subdivisions, and "any person employing six (6) or more persons within the state" (IC 22-9-1-3(h)). The definition excludes certain nonprofit fraternal and religious organizations, church-affiliated schools and social clubs. Federal Title VII and the ADA start at 15 employees and the federal age law at 20 (42 U.S.C. 2000e(b), 12111(5); 29 U.S.C. 630(b)).
Protected classes. The law defines a discriminatory practice by reference to "race, religion, color, sex, disability, national origin, ancestry, or status as a veteran" (IC 22-9-1-3(l)(1)) and provides that every discriminatory practice relating to employment "shall be considered unlawful." The statute text our research read does not list sexual orientation or gender identity. Since July 1, 2026, the definition of a discriminatory practice also includes "a violation of a person's rights protected under" Title VI or Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 or Title IX (IC 22-9-1-3(l)(7), added by HEA 1193); our research did not find an Indiana decision on how the Commission or courts apply (l)(7). Under federal law, Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), held that firing someone for being gay or transgender is sex discrimination under Title VII, which covers employers with 15 or more employees; the EEOC charge deadline in Indiana is 300 days.
Retaliation. A discriminatory practice also includes "an adverse action against a person because the person has taken action to protect a right" under the article, such as filing a charge or taking part in a proceeding (IC 22-9-1-3(l)(8)).
Age. Indiana's age chapter protects a person who "has attained the age of forty (40) years and has not attained the age of seventy-five (75) years" (IC 22-9-2-2). It applies to employers of one or more people but excludes any employer subject to the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (IC 22-9-2-1), and the federal law covers employers with 20 or more employees, so the state age chapter reaches only small employers. Age complaints under this chapter go to the Indiana Commissioner of Labor, not the Civil Rights Commission (IC 22-9-2-5), and any complaint the commissioner issues "must be so issued within four (4) months after the alleged unfair employment practices were committed" (IC 22-9-2-6), so contact the Department of Labor promptly.
Disability and pregnancy. Indiana's separate disability chapter applies to employers with at least 15 employees for 20 weeks (IC 22-9-5-10(b)). Employers with 15 or more employees may not discipline, terminate or retaliate against an employee for requesting or using a pregnancy accommodation (IC 22-9-12-4); that chapter states no remedy of its own.
The public-policy exception
In Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas Co., 260 Ind. 249, 297 N.E.2d 425 (1973), the Indiana Supreme Court held that "when an employee is discharged solely for exercising a statutorily conferred right an exception to the general rule must be recognized." An employee fired for filing a workers' compensation claim could sue, and was entitled to be "fully compensated in damages." Our research did not locate an Indiana statute on workers' compensation retaliation, so this court-made claim is the main protection. For the benefits side, see Indiana workers' compensation laws.
The court has kept the exception narrow:
- Refusing an illegal act. McClanahan v. Remington Freight Lines, Inc., 517 N.E.2d 390 (Ind. 1988), covers firing an employee "for refusing to commit an illegal act for which the employee would be personally liable," as Baker described it.
- A clear statutory right or duty. In Orr v. Westminster Village North, Inc., 689 N.E.2d 712 (Ind. 1997), the court said it recognizes the exception "if a clear statutory expression of a right or duty is contravened." The opinions our research read did not accept common-law or constitutional policy alone.
- Not wage complaints. In Meyers v. Meyers, 861 N.E.2d 704 (Ind. 2007), the court declined "to find exception for alleged wrongful discharge in retaliation for the assertion of a claim for unpaid wages," and said the Frampton language "is intended to recognize quite a limited exception."
Handbooks, contracts and promissory estoppel
In Orr, the court declined "to construe the employee handbook at issue as a valid unilateral contract," and kept the rule that an employee generally must provide "adequate independent consideration" to turn at-will employment into a job the employer can end only for good cause. Simply giving up another job or moving, "standing alone, does not constitute adequate independent consideration." A promissory estoppel claim must be pleaded with particularity: a promise, detrimental reliance, and the elements of the Restatement test (Orr; Baker).
Good faith and fair dealing
In Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Dabagia, 721 N.E.2d 294 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999), the Indiana Court of Appeals quoted the rule that "Indiana does not recognize such a cause of action in employment at will contexts" and held that the employer should have won summary judgment on the implied-covenant claim. That is an intermediate appellate decision; our research did not locate an Indiana Supreme Court holding on the point.
Firing for jury service or a court subpoena
Dismissing an employee, depriving the employee of benefits, or threatening either "because the employee has received or responded to a summons, served as a juror, or attended court for prospective jury service" is a Class B misdemeanor (IC 35-44.1-2-11). A person dismissed in violation "may bring a civil action, within ninety (90) days of the dismissal" to recover lost wages and obtain reinstatement, and the court must award a reasonable attorney's fee if the person wins a judgment (IC 34-28-4-1).
The same conduct toward an employee who receives a subpoena in a criminal proceeding is also a Class B misdemeanor (IC 35-44.1-2-12); our research did not locate a civil action for it.
Other Indiana retaliation protections
- Workplace safety (IOSHA): no one may discharge or discriminate against an employee for filing a complaint or for starting or testifying in an Indiana occupational safety proceeding (IC 22-8-1.1-38.1). The employee must complain to the commissioner within 30 calendar days of the violation, and the commissioner, through the attorney general, may sue within 120 days of the complaint for reinstatement with back pay.
- Off-duty tobacco use: an employer may not require an employee to abstain from tobacco outside work, or discriminate in pay, benefits or terms of employment because of it (IC 22-5-4-1). Churches and religious organizations are excluded (IC 22-5-4-4). The employee may sue for actual damages, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and an injunction (IC 22-5-4-2); the tobacco chapter states no deadline of its own, but the two-year limit for actions relating to employment (IC 34-11-2-1) applies on its face.
- Wage demands: an employer that discharges an employee for bringing or joining an action to recover wages, or for demanding wages, under Indiana's minimum wage law commits a Class C infraction (IC 22-2-2-11(a)(1)). That is a penalty, not a private damages claim, and Meyers refused a court-made claim for this situation.
- National Guard: an employer that knowingly or intentionally refuses to let an Indiana National Guard member attend a duty assembly commits a Class B misdemeanor (IC 10-16-7-4). Federal USERRA bars denying "retention in employment" because of military service (38 U.S.C. 4311(a)).
- Cooperating with the attorney general on employment eligibility: the 2026 Indiana Code includes IC 22-5-9-10, which bars discharging an employee for communicating or cooperating with the attorney general about compliance with that chapter. The chapter was added by Senate Enrolled Act 76 (P.L. 106-2026), effective July 1, 2026.
- Firearms locked in your vehicle: most employers may not adopt or enforce a policy that bars employees from keeping a lawfully possessed firearm or ammunition locked in the trunk or glove compartment, or out of sight in a locked vehicle (IC 34-28-7-1, 34-28-7-2(a)); the statute lists exceptions such as child care facilities, colleges, domestic violence shelters, the employer's residence and certain utilities (IC 34-28-7-2(b)). An individual harmed may sue for actual damages, court costs and attorney's fees (IC 34-28-7-3).
- Protective orders: an employer may not fire an employee for petitioning for a protective order or because of the actions of the person the order is against (IC 22-5-7-2); the section states no separate remedy.
- Military family leave: at employers with at least 50 employees, the Indiana military family leave chapter bars interference with its leave rights and lets the employee bring a civil action to enforce it (IC 22-2-13-1, 22-2-13-15, 22-2-13-16).
- Reserve training: a reserve member who leaves for up to 15 days of military training a year, with 90 days' notice, is entitled to be restored to the previous or a similar position and may sue for damages (IC 10-17-4-1, 10-17-4-3).
- Implanted devices: an employer may not require an employee to implant, inject or ingest a device as a condition of employment, or discriminate against an employee who refuses; the employee may sue for actual damages, costs and attorney's fees (IC 22-5-8-2, 22-5-8-3).
- Time off to vote: our search of the Indiana election title did not locate an employer time-off-to-vote statute.
Our research did not review Indiana's code chapter by chapter for every protection (for example, sick leave), so a protection missing from this list may still exist.
Whistleblowing
Indiana has a private-sector whistleblower statute only for employees of a private employer "that is under public contract." Such an employee may report in writing violations of law or misuse of public resources concerning the contract, and may not be dismissed, denied raises or promotion, transferred or demoted for doing so (IC 22-5-3-3). A violation is a Class A infraction (IC 22-5-3-3(d)); the section states no private damages claim and no deadline. Our research did not locate a general private-sector whistleblower statute. For more, see Indiana whistleblower laws.
Constructive discharge in Indiana
For the court-made retaliatory discharge claim, Indiana treats constructive discharge as part of the narrow public-policy exception. In Baker, the Supreme Court said "a constructive retaliatory discharge falls within the ambit of the narrowly drawn public policy exception," and that a claim "may rest on involuntary resignation, but only where the cause fits within the grounds recognized by our decisions on retaliatory discharge." It approved Tony v. Elkhart County, 851 N.E.2d 1032 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006), where workers' compensation retaliation made working conditions intolerable. Baker's own claim failed.

Wrongful termination deadlines in Indiana
| Claim | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana Civil Rights Commission complaint (employment) | 180 days from the discriminatory practice | IC 22-9-1-3(p) |
| State age complaint (employers not covered by the federal ADEA) | The commissioner's complaint must issue within 4 months of the practice | IC 22-9-2-6 |
| Elected civil action after a probable-cause finding | The election must be timely (IC 22-9-1-17(a), 22-9-1-18(a)); the statute sets no separate filing period, and the general two-year employment limitation (IC 34-11-2-1) may apply | IC 22-9-1-16, 22-9-1-17 |
| EEOC charge, race, color, national origin, sex, religion or disability (employer with 15 or more employees) | 300 days from the date of alleged harm | EEOC Indianapolis office timeliness page |
| EEOC charge, age (employer with 20 or more employees) | 180 days from the date of alleged harm | EEOC Indianapolis office timeliness page |
| Title VII or ADA lawsuit | 90 days after the EEOC Notice of Right to Sue | 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) |
| Jury-service dismissal lawsuit | 90 days from the dismissal | IC 34-28-4-1 |
| IOSHA retaliation complaint | 30 calendar days | IC 22-8-1.1-38.1 |
| Off-duty tobacco lawsuit | 2 years (the tobacco chapter states no separate period) | IC 34-11-2-1 |
| Retaliatory discharge (Frampton/McClanahan), oral-contract and other employment claims not based on a written contract | 2 years from the act complained of | IC 34-11-2-1 |
| Written contract (other than for the payment of money) | 10 years | IC 34-11-2-11 |
| NLRB charge (protected concerted activity) | 6 months | 29 U.S.C. 160(b) |

The EEOC's Indianapolis District Office says an individual in Indiana has "300 days from the date of alleged harm" to file a charge against an employer with 15 or more employees for race, color, national origin, sex, religion or disability, but "180 days from the date of alleged harm" for age discrimination against an employer with 20 or more employees. Charges against smaller employers go to the state or local agency; in Indiana, the state statute gives 180 days to file with the Commission (IC 22-9-1-3(p)). The same page also lists local agencies in East Chicago, Fort Wayne, Gary and South Bend; check that city's own rules for its deadline. Filing with a local agency means you may not also file with the Indiana Civil Rights Commission on the same matters, and the reverse (IC 22-9-1-12.1(d)); the statute lets either agency transfer a complaint to the other when it has jurisdiction.
Indiana sets a two-year deadline for any action relating to discharge or other terms of employment, except an action on a written contract: such an action "must be brought within two (2) years of the date of the act or omission complained of" (IC 34-11-2-1). That period applies on its face to a Frampton or McClanahan claim and to an oral-promise claim about the job. A written contract for the payment of money has a different period that our research did not read.
Where to file in Indiana
- Indiana Civil Rights Law claims: the Indiana Civil Rights Commission, which says employment complaints must be filed "within 180 days." The complaint must be in writing and verified (signed) (IC 22-9-1-3(o)).
- State age claims (employers not covered by the federal ADEA): the Indiana Commissioner of Labor (IC 22-9-2-5).
- Federal discrimination claims: the EEOC, through the EEOC Public Portal, or by phone at 1-800-669-4000 when a deadline is near. The Commission's statute lets it act on findings by the EEOC on a complaint filed with both agencies (IC 22-9-1-6(p)), and the EEOC says a charge filed with either it or a state agency it works with is automatically filed with the other.
- Jury-service, tobacco and public-policy claims: directly in court.
How a state case gets to court
The Civil Rights Law runs through the Commission. If the Commission finds probable cause, either side may elect to have the claims decided in a civil action, but "both the respondent and the complainant must agree in writing to have the claims decided in a court of law" (IC 22-9-1-16(a)). The case then goes to the circuit or superior court where the practice occurred, is tried by the judge without a jury, and the Commission may not represent the employee (IC 22-9-1-17). Without a timely election, the Commission holds an administrative hearing (IC 22-9-1-18).
House Enrolled Act 1193 (Public Law 83-2026), signed March 4, 2026 and effective July 1, 2026, amended this process. For employment cases, it provides that the Commission may not represent the plaintiff in an elected civil action (IC 22-9-1-17(d)) and requires the Commission to transmit a complaint that another state or federal agency has jurisdiction to investigate to that agency (IC 22-9-1-6(r)). Federal claims under Title VII and the ADA go through an EEOC charge and then to court within 90 days of the right-to-sue notice (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1)).
What a court can award
Indiana Civil Rights Law. The Commission, or a court in an elected civil action (IC 22-9-1-17(b)), may order the employer to stop the practice and take "further affirmative action," including restoring the employee's losses; but in employment cases other than veterans' cases, that "shall include only wages, salary, or commissions" (IC 22-9-1-6(j)). The sections our research read contain no compensatory or punitive damages clause.
Attorney's fees. IC 22-9-1-17, which governs an elected civil action, contains no attorney's fee clause. HEA 1193's only fee provision amends the fair housing article, not employment: a court in a civil action under that article "may award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party," and the judicial-review fee rules "do not apply to a civil action brought in a trial court" (IC 22-9.5-9-1, as amended by HEA 1193, SECTION 10).
Jury service: lost wages, reinstatement and a mandatory reasonable attorney's fee (IC 34-28-4-1). Off-duty tobacco: actual damages, costs, attorney's fees and an injunction (IC 22-5-4-2). Public-policy claims: damages (Frampton).
Federal law. Title VII and the ADA cap combined compensatory and punitive damages at $50,000 to $300,000 depending on employer size, with back pay outside the cap (42 U.S.C. 1981a(b)(3)). The wrongful termination guide lists the tiers.
Service letters: asking whether you quit or were fired
Indiana has a service-letter statute, but it is narrow. A discharged employee, or one who quit, may on written request get a signed letter "setting forth whether the employee quit or was involuntarily discharged" (IC 22-6-3-1). It does not require the employer to state the reason, and it does not apply to an employer that does not require written recommendations or written applications showing qualifications or experience. The statute states no deadline for the letter.
Separately, a job applicant may get copies of written communications from former employers, within 30 days of the application (IC 22-5-3-1(c)). A former employer that prevents a discharged employee from getting another job is liable to the employee in penal damages, although it may give a truthful written statement of the reasons for the discharge (IC 22-5-3-1(a)). Our research did not locate an Indiana statute giving private employees access to their personnel files, though it did not search for one specifically.
Practical steps after a firing in Indiana
Write down the date you were fired, who told you, the reason given, and any workers' compensation claim, jury summons or complaint involved, and keep copies of messages, reviews and the termination notice. Indiana's clocks are short: 30 days for an IOSHA complaint, 90 days for a jury-service suit, 180 days for a Commission complaint or an EEOC age charge, and two years for most employment lawsuits not based on a written contract (IC 34-11-2-1). If you want to know how the employer recorded your departure, the service-letter request must be in writing.
If the employer offers money in exchange for a release, read it before signing: a release can give up the claims described here. Our Indiana severance pay laws page covers those agreements, and the wrongful termination guide has more on preparing for a claim.
Recent changes
- HEA 1193 (P.L. 83-2026), signed March 4, 2026 and effective July 1, 2026, added two categories to the Civil Rights Law's definition of discriminatory practice, a violation of rights protected under Title VI, Title VII or Title IX (IC 22-9-1-3(l)(7)) and retaliation ((l)(8)), and changed its civil-action procedure as described above. Its attorney's fee change applies to fair housing cases (IC 22-9.5-9-1), not employment.
- IC 22-5-9 (P.L. 106-2026), the employment-eligibility chapter with its anti-retaliation clause, was added by Senate Enrolled Act 76, effective July 1, 2026.
Related
- Wrongful termination laws by state
- Indiana at-will employment laws
- Indiana workers' compensation laws
- Indiana whistleblower laws
- Indiana severance pay laws
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about Indiana wrongful termination law (the at-will rule and its exceptions, the Indiana Civil Rights Law, IC 22-9-2, IC 34-28-4-1, IC 22-8-1.1-38.1, IC 22-5-4, IC 22-6-3-1 and related statutes) and the federal laws that apply in Indiana. It is not legal advice. The information was verified on October 10, 2026. For advice about your situation, contact the Indiana Civil Rights Commission, the EEOC, a legal aid office or a lawyer licensed in Indiana.
Last updated: October 10, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue for wrongful termination in Indiana?
Only in narrow situations. Indiana is at-will, and the Supreme Court has recognized only three exceptions (Baker v. Tremco, 2009); otherwise a claim needs a statute such as the Indiana Civil Rights Law or IC 34-28-4-1 for jury service.
What is the deadline to file a discrimination complaint in Indiana?
A complaint with the Indiana Civil Rights Commission is valid only if filed within 180 days of the discriminatory practice (IC 22-9-1-3(p)). The EEOC's Indianapolis office gives 300 days for most federal charges and 180 days for age.
Can I sue my employer directly under the Indiana Civil Rights Law?
Not on your own. After the Commission finds probable cause, the case goes to court only if both sides agree in writing (IC 22-9-1-16(a)); otherwise the Commission holds a hearing. Federal claims can go to court after an EEOC charge.
Can I be fired for filing a workers' comp claim in Indiana?
Indiana courts treat that as wrongful. In Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas (1973) the Indiana Supreme Court held that an employee fired solely for exercising a statutory right, there a workers' compensation claim, may sue for damages.
Can I be fired for complaining about unpaid wages in Indiana?
The Indiana Supreme Court refused a wrongful-discharge claim for a wage complaint in Meyers v. Meyers (2007). Indiana's minimum wage law makes such a firing a Class C infraction (IC 22-2-2-11), and federal law also bars FLSA retaliation (29 U.S.C. 215(a)(3)).
Does Indiana require an employer to give a reason for firing?
Indiana's service-letter statute does not require one. On written request, a covered employer must give a signed letter saying only whether you quit or were involuntarily discharged (IC 22-6-3-1).
What damages are available under the Indiana Civil Rights Law?
For employment, the restored losses are limited to wages, salary or commissions, plus orders to stop the practice (IC 22-9-1-6(j)). The sections our research read contain no compensatory or punitive damages clause.
Can I be fired for jury duty in Indiana?
No. Firing an employee for jury service is a Class B misdemeanor (IC 35-44.1-2-11), and the employee may sue within 90 days for lost wages, reinstatement and attorney's fees (IC 34-28-4-1).
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Indiana Code, TITLE 22. LABOR AND SAFETY
§ 22-9-1-3DefinitionsIn force
Sec. 3. As used in this chapter: (a) "Person" means one (1) or more individuals, partnerships, associations, organizations, limited liability companies, corporations, labor organizations, cooperatives, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, receivers, and other organized groups of persons. (b) "Commission" means the civil rights commission created under section 4 of this chapter. (c) "Director" means the director of the civil rights commission. (d) "Deputy director" means the deputy director of the civil rights commission. (e) "Commission attorney" means the deputy attorney general, such assistants of the attorney general as may be assigned to the commission, or such other attorney as may be engaged by the commission. (f) "Consent agreement" means a formal agreement entered into in lieu of adjudication. (g) "Affirmative action" means those acts that the commission determines necessary to assure compliance with the Indiana civil rights law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 22-9-1-6Civil rights commission; powers and dutiesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Sec. 6. (a) The commission shall establish and maintain a permanent office in the city of Indianapolis. (b) Except as it concerns judicial review, the commission may adopt rules under IC 4-22-2 to implement this chapter. (c) The commission shall formulate policies to effectuate the purposes of this chapter and make recommendations to agencies and officers of the state or local subdivisions thereof to effectuate such policies. The several departments, commissions, divisions, authorities, boards, bureaus, agencies, and officers of the state or any political subdivision or agency thereof shall furnish the commission, upon its request, all records, papers, and information in their possession relating to any matter before the commission. (d) The commission shall receive and investigate complaints alleging discriminatory practices. The commission shall not hold hearings in the absence of a complaint. All investigations of complaints shall be conducted by staff members of the civil rights commission or their agents.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- MC Welding and MacHining Co. v. Kotwa (Indiana Court of Appeals 2006, 845 N.E.2d 188)“…tion after she filed a discrimination claim with the ICRC). Ind.Code § 22-9-1-6(h) provides that "[the commission shall…”
- Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. Washburn Realtors, Inc. (Indiana Court of Appeals 1993, 610 N.E.2d 293)“…ges for a racial insult. In so holding the court construed Ind. Code § 22-9-1-6 (k)(1), which empowers the Commission a…”
- Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Society, Inc. v. Elizabeth Bridgewater o/b/o Alyssa Bridgewater (Indiana Court of Appeals 2013, 990 N.E.2d 29)“…iance with the policy in places of public accommodations. I.C. § 22-9-1-6(j). A “public accommodation” is “any es…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Indiana Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
§ 22-9-1-17Filing of civil action; relief; trial by court; representationIn force
Sec. 17. (a) If a timely election is made under section 16 of this chapter, the complainant may file a civil action in a circuit or superior court having jurisdiction in the county in which a discriminatory practice allegedly occurred. (b) If the court finds that a discriminatory practice has occurred the court may grant the relief allowed under section 6(j) of this chapter. (c) A civil action filed under this section must be tried by the court without benefit of a jury. (d) The commission may not represent the plaintiff in a civil action filed under this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 22-9-1-2Public policy; construction of chapterIn force
Sec. 2. (a) It is the public policy of the state to provide all of its citizens equal opportunity for education, employment, access to public conveniences and accommodations, and acquisition through purchase or rental of real property, including but not limited to housing, and to eliminate segregation or separation based solely on race, religion, color, sex, disability, national origin, or ancestry, since such segregation is an impediment to equal opportunity. Equal education and employment opportunities and equal access to and use of public accommodations and equal opportunity for acquisition of real property are hereby declared to be civil rights. (b) The practice of denying these rights to properly qualified persons by reason of the race, religion, color, sex, disability, national origin, or ancestry of such person is contrary to the principles of freedom and equality of opportunity and is a burden to the objectives of the public policy of this state and shall be considered as discriminatory practices.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 22-9-2-2Unfair employment practice; dismissal from employmentIn force
Sec. 2. It is declared to be an unfair employment practice and to be against public policy to dismiss from employment, or to refuse to employ or rehire, any person solely because of his age if such person has attained the age of forty (40) years and has not attained the age of seventy-five (75) years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Indiana Code Title 22 (2026), including the Indiana Civil Rights Law, IC 22-9-1(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Civil Rights Commission, how to file a discrimination complaint(in.gov).gov
- Baker v. Tremco Inc., 917 N.E.2d 650 (Ind. 2009)(courtlistener.com)
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e, Title VII definitions(law.cornell.edu)
- 42 U.S.C. 12111, ADA definitions(law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 630, ADEA definitions(law.cornell.edu)
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas Co., 260 Ind. 249 (1973)(static.case.law)
- Orr v. Westminster Village North, Inc., 689 N.E.2d 712 (Ind. 1997)(courtlistener.com)
- Meyers v. Meyers, 861 N.E.2d 704 (Ind. 2007)(courtlistener.com)
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Dabagia, 721 N.E.2d 294 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)(courtlistener.com)
- Indiana Code Title 35 (2026), IC 35-44.1-2-11 and 35-44.1-2-12(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Code Title 34 (2026), IC 34-11-2-1, IC 34-28-4-1, IC 34-28-7 and limitations periods(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Code Title 10 (2026), IC 10-16-7-4 and IC 10-17-4(iga.in.gov).gov
- 38 U.S.C. 4311, USERRA discrimination prohibited(law.cornell.edu)
- EEOC Indianapolis District Office, timeliness(eeoc.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5, Title VII enforcement provisions(law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 160, NLRB unfair labor practice charges(law.cornell.edu)
- EEOC, how to file a charge of employment discrimination(eeoc.gov).gov
- Indiana General Assembly, 2026 House Bill 1193(iga.in.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 1981a, damages in cases of intentional discrimination(law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 215, FLSA prohibited acts(law.cornell.edu)
- House Enrolled Act 1193 (2026), enrolled text(iga.in.gov).gov
- Senate Enrolled Act 76 (2026), enrolled text(iga.in.gov).gov
- Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020)(www.supremecourt.gov).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.