Missouri
Missouri Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
Missouri's lemon law, Mo. Rev. Stat. sections 407.560 to 407.579, protects new-vehicle buyers: after four failed repair attempts for the same defect, or 30 or more working days out of service within the warranty period or one year of delivery, the manufacturer must replace or refund your vehicle.
Missouri's lemon law protects buyers of new motor vehicles that turn out to have serious, unfixable defects. Found in RSMo Sections 407.560 through 407.579, the law requires manufacturers to either replace or refund a defective vehicle after a reasonable number of failed repair attempts.
This guide covers every part of Missouri's lemon law, including which vehicles qualify, the repair attempt thresholds, how to file a claim, manufacturer defenses, and your options if you bought a used vehicle.
What Vehicles Does Missouri's Lemon Law Cover?
Under RSMo 407.560, the law defines a "new motor vehicle" as any vehicle propelled by power other than muscular power that meets specific criteria.
Eligibility Requirements
To qualify for protection, a vehicle must meet all of the following conditions:
- The vehicle must be new and transferred for the first time from a manufacturer, distributor, or dealer
- It cannot have been previously registered or titled in Missouri or any other state
- A franchised dealer authorized to sell that particular make must have sold the vehicle
- The vehicle must be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes
- A manufacturer's express warranty must cover the vehicle
Vehicles That Qualify
- New passenger vehicles: Cars, trucks, SUVs, and vans
- Demonstrator vehicles: Demo units with a manufacturer warranty
- Lease-purchase vehicles: Vehicles acquired through lease-purchase agreements where the manufacturer's warranty was issued as a condition of sale
- Recreational vehicle chassis: Only the chassis, engine, and powertrain components (not the living quarters)
Vehicles Excluded From Coverage
Missouri's lemon law specifically excludes several vehicle types:
- Commercial motor vehicles
- Off-road vehicles
- Motorcycles
- Mopeds
- Electric bicycles (as defined in RSMo 300.010)
- Recreational motor vehicles (living portions only; chassis components remain covered)
- Used vehicles (regardless of remaining warranty)
- Standard leased vehicles (only lease-purchase agreements qualify)
What Counts as a "Nonconformity"?
A nonconformity is any defect or condition that does not conform to the manufacturer's express warranty and that impairs the use, market value, or safety of the vehicle. The problem must be something the manufacturer is obligated to fix under its own warranty.
Common examples of qualifying nonconformities include:
- Engine or transmission failures that persist after repair
- Brake system malfunctions
- Steering defects
- Electrical system problems
- Persistent stalling, misfiring, or failure to start
- Heating or air conditioning failures
- Significant fluid leaks
- Safety system defects (airbags, stability control, anti-lock brakes)
Minor cosmetic issues or problems caused by the consumer's own abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications generally do not qualify.
Missouri's Lemon Law Presumption
Under RSMo 407.571, Missouri law creates a legal presumption that a reasonable number of repair attempts have been made when certain conditions are met. This presumption shifts the burden to the manufacturer to prove otherwise.
When the Presumption Applies
| Condition | Threshold | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Repair Attempts (Same Defect) | 4 or more attempts | The same nonconformity must continue to exist after each attempt |
| Days Out of Service | 30 or more working days | Cumulative total across all repair visits; excludes routine maintenance |
| Timeframe | Within warranty period or 1 year from delivery | Whichever period expires earlier |
The 30-day out-of-service period may be extended if repair services are unavailable due to conditions beyond the manufacturer's control, such as parts shortages caused by supply chain issues or natural disasters.
Important Timing Details
The warranty period or one-year window may also be extended if the consumer reported a nonconformity before the expiration date but the manufacturer had not yet completed the repair. This extension provision under RSMo 407.573 prevents manufacturers from running out the clock on warranty claims.
Consumer Remedies: Refund vs. Replacement
When a vehicle qualifies under Missouri's lemon law, RSMo 407.567 requires the manufacturer to provide one of two remedies.
Option 1: Replace the Vehicle
The manufacturer may provide a comparable new motor vehicle that is acceptable to the consumer. The replacement must be of similar value and features. If the consumer does not find the offered replacement acceptable, the manufacturer must work toward an alternative resolution.
Option 2: Refund the Purchase Price
The manufacturer takes title to the defective vehicle and refunds the consumer. The refund includes:
- Full purchase price: The total amount the consumer paid
- Collateral charges: Sales tax, license fees, registration fees, title fees, and motor vehicle inspection fees
- Less usage allowance: A reasonable deduction for the consumer's use of the vehicle before the first repair attempt
Missouri's statute does not prescribe a specific formula for calculating the usage allowance. The deduction must be "reasonable," which courts and arbitrators typically base on the mileage driven before the first report of the defect relative to the vehicle's expected useful life.
Note: Under Missouri law, the manufacturer chooses between replacement and refund. This differs from some states that give the consumer the choice.
How Refunds Are Distributed
Refunds go to the consumer and any lienholder of record, split according to their respective interests. If you financed the vehicle, the lender receives its portion first, and you receive the remainder.
Sales Tax Recovery
Missouri provides a specific mechanism for recovering sales tax. The manufacturer may apply to the Missouri Department of Revenue for reimbursement of sales tax and fees that were refunded to the consumer. Alternatively, the manufacturer may direct the consumer to apply directly to the Department of Revenue for the refund.
How to File a Lemon Law Claim in Missouri
Filing a lemon law claim in Missouri requires following specific steps in the correct order.
Step 1: Document Every Repair Visit
Thorough documentation is essential for a successful claim. Keep records of:
- All repair orders and invoices (with dates and descriptions of work performed)
- The number of days your vehicle spent at the repair facility
- Written descriptions of symptoms you experienced
- All correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer
- Receipts for towing, rental cars, and other related expenses
- Photographs or videos of defects when possible
Step 2: Report the Problem During the Coverage Period
Under RSMo 407.565, you must report any nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or an authorized dealer during the warranty term or within one year of delivery (whichever expires first). The manufacturer is then obligated to make repairs necessary to conform the vehicle to the express warranty.
Step 3: Allow Reasonable Repair Attempts
Give the manufacturer or its authorized dealer at least four opportunities to repair the same defect. Track each attempt carefully, noting dates, duration, and whether the problem was resolved.
Step 4: Send Written Notification to the Manufacturer
This step is critical. Under RSMo 407.573, before pursuing lemon law remedies, you (or your representative) must send written notification directly to the manufacturer describing the nonconformity and requesting repair.
After receiving your written notice, the manufacturer must immediately inform you of a reasonably accessible repair facility. Once you deliver the vehicle to that facility, the manufacturer has 10 calendar days to conform the vehicle to the express warranty.
Send your written notice via certified mail with return receipt requested so you have proof of delivery.
Step 5: Use Informal Dispute Settlement (If Required)
Under RSMo 407.575, if the manufacturer has established an approved informal dispute settlement procedure that complies with federal regulations (16 C.F.R. Part 703), you must participate in it before filing a lawsuit. The manufacturer must provide information about this procedure in the warranty or owner's manual.
Many major manufacturers participate in the BBB AUTO LINE program, administered by BBB National Programs, which handles Missouri lemon law disputes at no cost to consumers. If the manufacturer failed to inform you about an available dispute settlement procedure, this requirement may not apply.
Step 6: File a Lawsuit if Necessary
If informal resolution fails or no dispute settlement procedure exists, you may file a lawsuit. Under RSMo 407.577, if you prevail, the court may order the manufacturer to pay your costs, expenses, and reasonable attorney fees.
Statute of Limitations
Missouri imposes strict deadlines for filing a lemon law claim. Under RSMo 407.573, you must file your action within the earliest of:
- 6 months after the warranty expires
- 18 months after the date of original delivery of the vehicle
- 90 days after the final decision of any informal dispute settlement procedure
Whichever deadline comes first controls. Missing these deadlines means losing your right to pursue a lemon law claim, so act promptly once you believe your vehicle qualifies.
Manufacturer Defenses
Under RSMo 407.569, manufacturers may raise affirmative defenses to avoid liability.
Recognized Defenses
| Defense | What the Manufacturer Claims | How to Counter It |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer abuse or neglect | The nonconformity resulted from the consumer's misuse | Provide detailed maintenance records showing proper care |
| Unauthorized modifications | Aftermarket parts or alterations caused the defect | Demonstrate the problem existed before any modifications were made |
| No substantial impairment | The defect does not meaningfully impair use, value, or safety | Document specifically how the defect affects daily use and vehicle value |
The manufacturer carries the burden of proving these defenses. Keeping thorough maintenance records and repair documentation makes it much harder for a manufacturer to succeed with these arguments.
Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act Overlay
In addition to Missouri's state law, the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. Ch. 50) provides a parallel remedy for any consumer covered by a written manufacturer warranty. Under the federal law, a manufacturer's failure to honor warranty obligations can give rise to a breach-of-warranty claim in federal or state court, with attorney fee shifting available to prevailing consumers. Missouri's lemon law and the Magnuson-Moss Act work together: state law creates the repair-attempt presumption; the federal act provides an independent cause of action and a longer potential limitations window (up to four years under the UCC-based implied warranty theory in some cases). Consumers frequently pursue both simultaneously.
Protections for Used Vehicle Buyers
Missouri's lemon law applies only to new motor vehicles. However, used vehicle buyers are not without legal options.
Warranty Transfer Situations
If you purchase a used vehicle that is still within the original manufacturer's warranty period, and the warranty terms allow transfer to subsequent owners, you may have rights under the warranty itself. Some manufacturer warranties transfer automatically; others require registration.
Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. Ch. 50) applies to both new and used vehicles covered by a written warranty. Key advantages of the federal law include:
- Covers used vehicles still under the original manufacturer's warranty
- Provides a longer filing window in some cases
- Allows recovery of attorney fees if you prevail
- Applies alongside state law protections
Other Legal Remedies for Used Vehicles
- Missouri Consumer Protection Act: Covers deceptive practices in vehicle sales
- UCC warranty claims: Implied warranties of merchantability under the Uniform Commercial Code
- Common law fraud claims: When a seller knowingly misrepresents a vehicle's condition
Under RSMo 407.579, Missouri's lemon law does not limit any other rights or remedies a consumer may have under any other state or federal law.
Filing a Complaint With the Missouri Attorney General
In addition to pursuing lemon law remedies, you can file a consumer complaint with the Missouri Attorney General's Office. The AG's office enforces the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and mediates disputes between consumers and businesses.
To file a complaint:
- Online: Submit a complaint at ago.mo.gov
- Phone: Call the Consumer Protection Hotline at 800-392-8222
- Mail: Download and mail the complaint form from the AG's website
The AG's consumer mediation process has resulted in millions of dollars in restitution for Missouri consumers. While filing a complaint with the AG does not replace pursuing your lemon law rights, it creates an official record and may help resolve your dispute.
Tips for Strengthening Your Lemon Law Claim
Following these practices from the moment you notice a problem will improve your chances of a successful outcome:
- Report problems immediately. Do not wait for a defect to worsen before taking the vehicle in for repair.
- Use authorized dealers. Always take the vehicle to a manufacturer-authorized repair facility. Repairs performed at independent shops may not count toward the repair attempt threshold.
- Get everything in writing. Request written repair orders for every visit, even if the dealer says no problem was found.
- Keep a log. Record dates, mileage, symptoms, and the names of service advisors you speak with.
- Do not accept verbal promises. If a dealer or manufacturer representative promises a resolution, get it in writing.
- Consult an attorney early. Many lemon law attorneys offer free consultations, and attorney fees may be recoverable if you win.
More Missouri Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How many repair attempts trigger Missouri's lemon law?
Missouri's lemon law presumption applies after four or more repair attempts for the same nonconformity, or after the vehicle is out of service for 30 or more working days. These conditions must occur within the warranty period or one year from delivery, whichever is earlier. You must also send written notification to the manufacturer and allow a final 10-day repair opportunity before pursuing remedies.
Can I choose between a refund and a replacement vehicle?
No. Under Missouri law, the manufacturer chooses whether to provide a replacement vehicle or a refund. However, any replacement vehicle must be acceptable to the consumer, which gives you some negotiating power. If you reject the replacement as unacceptable, the manufacturer may need to offer an alternative.
Do I have to use the manufacturer's arbitration program?
If the manufacturer has an approved informal dispute settlement procedure that complies with federal regulations and has informed you about it in the warranty or owner's manual, you must participate before filing a lawsuit. Many manufacturers use the BBB AUTO LINE program. If the manufacturer did not properly notify you of the procedure, this requirement may not apply. Arbitration decisions are not binding on the consumer; you can still file a lawsuit afterward.
Does Missouri's lemon law cover used vehicles?
No. Missouri's lemon law applies only to new motor vehicles. However, used vehicle buyers may have protections under the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (if the vehicle is still under a manufacturer's written warranty), the Missouri Consumer Protection Act, UCC implied warranty claims, or common law fraud claims.
How long do I have to file a lemon law claim in Missouri?
You must file within 18 months of the original delivery date or within 6 months after the warranty expires, whichever comes first. If you participated in an informal dispute settlement procedure, you have 90 days after the final decision to file suit.
Can I recover attorney fees in a Missouri lemon law case?
Yes. Under RSMo 407.577, if you prevail in a lemon law action, the court may order the manufacturer to pay your costs, expenses, and reasonable attorney fees. Many Missouri lemon law attorneys offer free consultations and work on a contingency or fee-shifting basis.
Updates
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 10 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XIX (MOTOR VEHICLES, WATERCRAFT AND AVIATION), Chapter 300
§ 300.010Definitions.In force
The following words and phrases when used in this ordinance mean: (1) "Alley" or "alleyway", any street with a roadway of less than twenty feet in width; (2) "All-terrain vehicle", any motorized vehicle manufactured and used exclusively for off-highway use, with an unladen dry weight of one thousand five hundred pounds or less, traveling on three, four or more nonhighway tires, with either: (a) A seat designed to be straddled by the operator, and handlebars for steering control, but excluding an electric bicycle; or (b) A width of fifty inches or less, measured from outside of tire rim to outside of tire rim, regardless of seating or steering arrangement; (3) "Authorized emergency vehicle", a vehicle publicly owned and operated as an ambulance, or a vehicle publicly owned and operated by the state highway patrol, police or fire department, sheriff or constable or deputy sheriff, traffic officer or any privately owned vehicle operated as an ambulance when responding to emergency calls; (4) "Business district", the territory contiguous to and including a highway when within any six hundred feet along the highway there are buildings in use for business or industrial…
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 2 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2020
Leading cases: In Re Buchberger (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona 2004, 311 B.R. 794) · T.K. v. Cleveland (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2020)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XXVI (TRADE AND COMMERCE), Chapter 407
§ 407.560Definitions.In force
As used in sections 407.560 to 407.579, the following terms mean: (1) "Collateral charges", those additional charges to a consumer not directly attributable to a manufacturer's suggested retail price label for the new motor vehicle. For the purposes of sections 407.560 to 407.579, "collateral charges" includes all sales tax, license fees, registration fees, title fees and motor vehicle inspections; (2) "Comparable motor vehicle", an identical or reasonably equivalent motor vehicle; (3) "Consumer", the purchaser, other than for the purposes of resale, of a new motor vehicle, primarily used for personal, family, or household purposes, and any person to whom such new motor vehicle is transferred for the same purposes during the duration of an express warranty applicable to such new motor vehicle, and any other person entitled by the terms of such warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty; (4) "Express warranty", any written affirmation of the fact or promise made by a manufacturer to a consumer in connection with the sale of new motor vehicles which relates to the nature of the material or workmanship or will meet a specified level of performance over a specified…
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 4 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2023
Leading cases: Boemler Chevrolet Co. v. Combs (Missouri Court of Appeals 1991, 808 S.W.2d 875) · Stewart v. Sieben, Inc. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1989, 783 S.W.2d 432) · Reinbold v. AGCO Corporation (District Court, E.D. Missouri 2023)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 407.565Report of nonconformity required, when — repairs, duty of manufacturer or agent, when.In force
For the purposes of sections 407.560 to 407.579, if a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, or its agent, during the term of such express warranties, or during the period of one year following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever period expires earlier, the manufacturer, or its agent, shall make such repairs as are necessary to conform the new vehicle to such express warranties, notwithstanding the fact that such repairs are made after the expiration of such term or such one-year period.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
§ 407.567Replacement of motor vehicle or refund of purchase price, when — allowance deducted for consumer's use — reimbursement, when, application for.In force
1. If the manufacturer, through its authorized dealer or its agent, cannot conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any default or condition which impairs the use, market value, or safety of the new motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer shall, at its option, either replace the new motor vehicle with a comparable new vehicle acceptable to the consumer, or take title of the vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the full purchase price, including all reasonably incurred collateral charges, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle. The subtraction of a reasonable allowance for use shall apply when either a replacement or refund of the new motor vehicle occurs. 2. Refunds shall be made to the consumer and lienholder of record, if any, as their interests may appear.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
§ 407.569Affirmative defenses.In force
It shall be an affirmative defense to any claim under sections 407.560 to 407.579 that: (1) An alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle; (2) A nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle; (3) A claim by a consumer was not filed in good faith; or (4) Any other affirmative defense allowed by law.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
§ 407.571Presumptions of nonconformity — exception.In force
It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties if within the terms, conditions, or limitations of the express warranty, or during the period of one year following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever expires earlier, either: (1) The same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer, or its agents, and such nonconformity continues to exist; or (2) The new vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of the nonconformity by the manufacturer, through its authorized dealer or its agents, for a cumulative total of thirty or more working days, exclusive of down time for routine maintenance as prescribed by the manufacturer, since delivery of the new vehicle to the consumer. The thirty-day period may be extended by a period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of conditions beyond the control of the manufacturer or its agents.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
§ 407.573Warranty extension, when — complaint remedies information to be furnished — notice to manufacturer required — manufacturer's duties, time limitation.In force
1. The terms, conditions, or limitations of the express warranty, or* the period of one year following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever expires earlier, may be extended if the new motor vehicle warranty problem has been reported but has not been repaired by the manufacturer, or its agent, by the expiration of the applicable time period. 2. The manufacturer shall provide information for consumer complaint remedies with each new motor vehicle. It shall be the responsibility of the consumer, or his representative, prior to availing himself of the provisions of sections 407.560 to 407.579, to give written notification to the manufacturer of the need for the repair of the nonconformity, in order to allow the manufacturer an opportunity to cure the alleged defect. The manufacturer shall immediately notify the consumer of a reasonably accessible repair facility of a franchised new vehicle dealer to conform the new vehicle to the express warranty. After delivery of the new vehicle to an authorized repair facility by the consumer, the manufacturer shall have ten calendar days to conform the new motor vehicle to the express…
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2013
Leading cases: Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. JF Enterprises, LLC (Supreme Court of Missouri 2013, 400 S.W.3d 763)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 407.575Manufacturer with approved settlement procedure, consumer's duty.In force
If a manufacturer has established an informal dispute settlement procedure which complies in all respects with the provisions of the code of Federal Regulations, 16 CFR 703, provisions of sections 407.560 to 407.579 concerning refunds or replacements shall not apply to any consumer who has not first resorted to such procedure.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 1989
Leading cases: Stewart v. Sieben, Inc. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1989, 783 S.W.2d 432)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 407.577Court action by consumer, costs, expenses, attorney's fees, how paid.In force
1. If a consumer undertakes a court action after complying with the provisions of sections 407.560 to 407.579 and finally prevails in that action, he shall be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of costs and expenses, including attorney's fees based on actual time expended, determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the plaintiff for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action. 2. If any claim by a consumer under sections 407.560 to 407.579 is found by a court to have been filed in bad faith, or solely for the purpose of harassment, or in the absence of a substantial justifiable issue of either law or fact raised by the consumer, or for which the final recovery is not at least ten percent greater than any settlement offer made by the manufacturer prior to the commencement of the court action, then the consumer shall be liable for all costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the manufacturer, or its agent, as a direct result of the bad faith claim.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
§ 407.579Consumer's right to other remedies — law to apply, when.In force
1. Except as provided in subdivision (1) of section 407.560, nothing in sections 407.560 to 407.579 shall in any way limit the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer at law or in equity. 2. Sections 407.560 to 407.579 shall apply to any new motor vehicle sold after January 1, 1985.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-31 · Read the full section at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 2 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2005
Leading cases: Edwards v. Hyundai Motor America (Missouri Court of Appeals 2005, 163 S.W.3d 494) · Stewart v. Sieben, Inc. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1989, 783 S.W.2d 432)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Missouri Lemon Law Statutes (RSMo 407.560-407.579)(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- RSMo 407.560: New Motor Vehicle Warranties - Definitions(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- RSMo 407.567: Replacement or Refund of Purchase Price(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- RSMo 407.571: Presumption of Reasonable Repair Attempts(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- RSMo 407.573: Written Notification and Manufacturer Duties(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- RSMo 407.577: Court Action, Costs, and Attorney Fees(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- Missouri Attorney General: Consumer Protection Division(ago.mo.gov).gov
- Missouri Department of Revenue: Motor Vehicle Division(dor.mo.gov).gov
- Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. Chapter 50)(law.cornell.edu)
- RSMo § 407.575: Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures(revisor.mo.gov).gov