Mississippi Traffic Camera Ticket Laws: Banned at Home, Recognized From Other States

Mississippi is a genuinely two-sided story. State law bans local governments from running red light or speed camera programs, full stop. But the same body of Mississippi law contains a separate statute that lets the state recognize, and act on, an unpaid camera-based fine issued by a different state. If you live in Mississippi and think «cameras are banned here» settles the question of whether a camera ticket can ever touch your license, this page is the correction.

The Home Ban: No Local Camera Ordinances

Mississippi's ban lives at Miss. Code sec. 17-25-19, enacted as 2009 HB 1568. Its text is direct: «Neither the board of supervisors of any county nor the governing authority of any municipality shall adopt, enact or enforce any ordinance authorizing the use of automated recording equipment or system to enforce compliance with traffic signals, traffic speeds or other traffic laws, rules or regulations on any public street, road or highway within this state or to impose or collect any civil or criminal fine, fee or penalty for any such violation.» The same bill required that «any county or municipality using automated recording equipment or system shall remove the equipment or system before October 1, 2009.»

Notice the specific reach of that language: it is a bar on county and municipal ordinances. It does not, by its own text, address a state agency running a camera program directly, which is worth flagging because of 2025 reporting describing Mississippi's Department of Public Safety deploying AI-equipped mobile camera units for real-time violation monitoring. Whether, and how, that kind of state-level activity interacts with sec. 17-25-19 was not confirmed from a DPS primary source this session, so this page notes the reporting exists without confirming what those units actually do or whether any citation has issued from one.

Recent Attempts to Tighten the Ban All Failed

The Mississippi Legislature has tried, three times, to close a perceived loophole in the 2009 ban, and all three attempts failed in 2025. Senate Bill 2201 would have extended the ban's definition to cover manually operated automated equipment, a response to reports of handheld devices being used for camera-style enforcement in some cities. It passed the Senate on February 12, 2025, but died in a House committee on March 4, 2025. House Bill 528, which would have extended the ban to automated license plate reader systems, was not enacted either. A third bill, House Bill 1090, introduced January 20, 2025 and defining «manually operated automated recording equipment» in nearly identical terms to SB 2201, would have required positive driver verification before a handheld-camera citation could issue; it died in committee on February 4, 2025. That means the ban, as written, still tracks its original 2009 language, and the handheld-device question the Legislature declined to resolve three separate times remains genuinely open. An April 2026 complaint to the Mississippi Office of the State Auditor requesting investigation of camera-assisted radar-gun programs named at least eight cities: Moss Point, Biloxi, Hattiesburg, Pearl, Senatobia, Batesville, Saltillo, and New Albany. No appellate ruling on any of these disputes had been found as of this session's research, so treat them as pending rather than resolved.

The Interstate Twist: Mississippi Can Recognize Another State's Camera Fine

Here is the statute that makes Mississippi's story genuinely unusual. Miss. Code sec. 63-9-37, enacted as 2013 HB 91, governs how Mississippi's Department of Public Safety treats camera-based fines from other states. Its text: DPS «shall only recognize» another state's camera-based fine «if that state is a member of the Driver License Compact,» and DPS «shall not suspend the driver's license of a person for failure to pay any civil or criminal fine, fee, citation or penalty for such a violation unless the state that is due the fine... is a member of the Driver License Compact.»

Read that carefully and the contradiction becomes clear. Mississippi will not let its own counties or cities run a camera program. But its own statute contemplates DPS suspending a Mississippi driver's license because that driver did not pay a camera-based fine issued by a different state, as long as that state belongs to the Driver License Compact. A Mississippi resident who gets a camera ticket while driving through, say, a Compact-member state with an active red light camera program cannot assume that Mississippi's local ban protects them from consequences back home.

This is worth pairing against South Dakota, a fellow ban state whose law runs the opposite direction: South Dakota affirmatively blocks the kind of data-sharing that would let another state's camera fine reach a South Dakota license. Mississippi and South Dakota reach the same in-state result (no lawful local cameras) through very different interstate rules.

What This Means If You're a Mississippi Driver

If you were ticketed by a camera somewhere in Mississippi, the statute above says that ticket has no lawful basis unless it came from a state agency rather than a county or municipal ordinance, a distinction worth raising if you contest it. If you were ticketed by a camera in another state and you are a Mississippi license holder, the interstate statute means nonpayment can carry real consequences at home, specifically if the issuing state is a Driver License Compact member, so do not assume distance protects you from that particular fine.

Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources

• Traffic Camera Ticket Laws by State
• Do You Have to Pay a Camera Ticket?
• How to Fight a Camera Ticket
• Louisiana Traffic Camera Ticket Laws
• DUI Laws by State
• Can You Get a Speeding Ticket Without Being Pulled Over?

---

Last updated: 2026-08-12.