Indiana Camera Ticket Laws: Work-Zone Speed Camera Pilot
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Indiana's only camera-enforcement program is a narrow, INDOT-run pilot that photographs speeders in active highway work zones. There is no red light camera authorization anywhere in Indiana law, and the speed-camera pilot itself is capped at just four systems statewide. If you got a notice from an Indiana work zone, that is almost certainly what generated it.
Are Red Light Cameras Legal in Indiana?
No. There is no Indiana statute authorizing red light camera ticketing anywhere in the state. This is an absence of authorization, not a ban; Indiana has never passed a law either allowing or prohibiting red light cameras specifically. If you see Indiana listed as «prohibited» for red light cameras in a national tracker, that typically reflects this same absence of any enabling law, not a dedicated ban statute.
The Work-Zone Speed Camera Pilot
Indiana's only camera-enforcement program targets speeding in active highway work zones. It was created by 2023 HEA 1015, codified at IC 8-23-32, and effective July 1, 2023. The Indiana Department of Transportation runs it under the name «Safe Zones,» and INDOT's own program description explains the mechanics: «Camera technology will document vehicles traveling 11 mph or more over the posted speed limit using images of rear license plates,» and critically, «workers must be present for violations to be valid.» That worker-presence requirement means the cameras are not simply always-on; they are tied to actual construction activity.

The program is also geographically narrow, which matters if you are holding a notice from somewhere other than an interstate. IC 8-23-32-1 applies the entire chapter only to «a part of a road or bridge on the interstate system (as defined in IC 8-23-1.1-24) or a U.S. route.» A work zone on a state road or a local street falls outside chapter 32, so chapter 32 could not have produced a notice from one.
IC 8-23-32-11 sets two separate numerical limits rather than one. Under subsection (b), the department «may purchase not more than four (4) worksite speed control systems under the pilot program,» and under subsection (c) it «may operate and monitor not more than four (4) worksites in a single calendar year.» INDOT's description of the program running at «up to four sites at any given time» is the agency's own paraphrase of those limits, not the statute's wording.
Subsection (a) of that same section allows a system to operate only when highway construction or maintenance is occurring and workers are present at the worksite. IC 8-23-32-13 further restricts who may operate a system to an employee of the Department of Transportation or a police officer employed by the Indiana State Police. INDOT continued to describe it as a pilot program as of 2026, rather than a permanent, fully rolled-out system, but that is INDOT's own program framing; the statute itself sets no expiration date (see below).
Fines and Points
IC 8-23-32-18 sets out the tiered penalty structure directly: a written warning for the first violation, a $75 civil penalty for the second violation, and a $150 penalty for the third and each subsequent violation, with the money deposited into the state general fund. The statute ties those tiers to the number of violations a person has under the chapter and does not limit the warning to a first violation at a particular camera or worksite. The section does not apply to a person who is separately charged for the same conduct under Indiana's ordinary speeding statute, IC 9-21-5-11.
The statute itself sets no payment deadline. IC 8-23-32-19 applies Indiana's administrative procedure law, IC 4-21.5, to determinations, notices, hearings, and appeals under the chapter, and IC 8-23-32-21 lets INDOT adopt rules covering those procedures. INDOT's program materials supply the due date: the Safe Zones program site states that «Payment is due within 30 days of a violation being mailed,» and that «violations may be paid online, by phone, or by mail.» Check the due date printed on your own notice against that 30-day window.
On license points, the statute is firmer ground than the program FAQ. IC 8-23-32-18 makes a Safe Zones violation a civil penalty assessed by INDOT rather than an infraction judgment, and subsection (e) provides that a person assessed that civil penalty is not liable for an infraction under IC 9-21-5-11. No section of the chapter provides for license points or for reporting a violation to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. INDOT's program FAQ does carry a question about license points, but its answer is loaded by the page's script and could not be retrieved at the source for this article, so nothing from it is quoted here. Whether the violation affects insurance rates is not addressed anywhere in the statute or the program materials reviewed for this article, and no assumption is made here either way.
No Statutory Sunset Date
IC 8-23-32 has been read in full for this article, all 21 sections, including the administrative-procedure, reporting, and rulemaking sections near the end of the chapter. No sunset or expiration clause appears anywhere in the chapter as currently written. INDOT continuing to call this a «pilot» is the agency's own program framing, not a statutory time limit; nothing in the law itself requires the program to end or be re-authorized by a specific date. If that changes in a future legislative session, this page will be updated.

Owner Liability
IC 8-23-32-17 creates a rebuttable presumption that the vehicle's registered owner is liable for a captured violation. That presumption has one explicit carve-out: it does not apply to a motor vehicle rental company. The statute lists four specific defenses an owner can raise to rebut the presumption: (1) the recipient was not the vehicle's owner or was not driving it at the time, (2) the vehicle was reported stolen before the violation, (3) the speed control system was not properly tested or calibrated, or (4) workers were not actually present in the work zone when the violation was recorded. A driver cited in person at the scene, rather than by mailed notice, is handled outside this owner-liability process entirely.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Traffic Camera Ticket Laws by State
- Do You Have to Pay a Camera Ticket?
- How to Fight a Camera Ticket
- Automated License Plate Reader Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Indiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Are speed cameras legal in Indiana?
Only in a narrow context: active highway work zones under INDOT's «Safe Zones» pilot, authorized by IC 8-23-32. IC 8-23-32-1 confines that chapter to the interstate system and U.S. routes, so a work zone on a state road or a local street is outside it. There is no general highway or neighborhood speed-camera program in Indiana.
Are red light cameras legal in Indiana?
No. Indiana has no statute authorizing red light camera enforcement anywhere in the state. This reflects an absence of any enabling law, not a specific ban.
How much is an Indiana work-zone camera ticket?
The first violation is a zero-fine warning. The second is a $75 civil penalty, and every violation after that is $150, under IC 8-23-32-18 and INDOT's official program materials.
Does an Indiana work-zone camera ticket go on my driving record?
IC 8-23-32-18 treats it as a civil penalty assessed by INDOT rather than an infraction judgment, and subsection (e) says a person assessed that civil penalty is not liable for an infraction under the ordinary speeding statute. No section of the chapter provides for license points or for reporting the violation to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Whether it affects insurance rates is not addressed in the materials reviewed for this article.
Do I get a warning before I'm fined in an Indiana work zone?
Yes. IC 8-23-32-18(c) makes the first violation a written warning with no fine, before any monetary penalty applies on a second or later violation. The statute does not tie that warning to a particular camera or worksite.
What happens if I don't pay an Indiana work-zone camera ticket?
INDOT's program materials state that payment is due within 30 days of a violation being mailed. Neither IC 8-23-32 nor the program materials reviewed for this article state a specific collection consequence for nonpayment; IC 8-23-32-19 applies Indiana's administrative procedure law, IC 4-21.5, to determinations, notices, hearings, and appeals under the chapter.
How many work-zone cameras does Indiana actually use?
IC 8-23-32-11 sets two limits: the department may purchase not more than four systems under the pilot program, and may operate and monitor not more than four worksites in a single calendar year. A system can only be used where highway construction or maintenance is occurring and workers are actually present in the zone.
Can I get out of an Indiana work-zone camera ticket by showing I wasn't driving?
Yes. IC 8-23-32-17 lets the registered owner rebut the presumption of liability by showing they weren't the owner or driver at the time, that the vehicle was reported stolen, that the camera system wasn't properly tested or calibrated, or that workers weren't actually present. That presumption does not apply to a rental car company at all.
Does Indiana's work-zone camera pilot have an end date?
No. IC 8-23-32 has no sunset or expiration clause anywhere in its text. INDOT's continued use of the word «pilot» reflects the agency's own program framing, not a statutory deadline.
Updates
Corrected the payment window (INDOT states payment is due within 30 days of a violation being mailed), removed the unsupported claim that the first-violation warning applies per camera, restated the IC 8-23-32-11 limits as the statute writes them (four systems purchased, four worksites monitored per calendar year), added the chapter limit to interstate highways and U.S. routes, and replaced an unverifiable quoted FAQ line about license points with the statutory basis.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Indiana Code, TITLE 8. UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION
§ 8-23-32-18Infractions; civil penaltiesIn force
Sec. 18. (a) This section does not apply to a person who has been charged with an infraction for a violation of IC 9-21-5-11. (b) The department shall assess a civil penalty against a person who exceeds a worksite speed limit if the worksite speed control system indicates that the operator of a motor vehicle has exceeded the worksite speed limit by at least eleven (11) miles per hour. (c) A person who exceeds a worksite speed limit that is detected under this chapter is subject to the following civil penalties: (1) A written warning for the first violation. (2) A civil penalty of seventy-five dollars ($75) for the second violation. (3) A civil penalty of one hundred fifty dollars ($150) for the third and each subsequent violation. (d) A civil penalty collected under this section shall be deposited in the state general fund. (e) A person assessed a civil penalty under this section is not liable for an infraction for a violation of IC 9-21-5-11.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 8-23-32-17Owner liability; rebuttable presumption; defensesIn force
Sec. 17. (a) Except as provided in subsection (d), the owner of a motor vehicle identified through a worksite speed control system is liable for the civil penalty described in section 18 of this chapter for exceeding a worksite speed limit. (b) There is a rebuttable presumption that the owner of a motor vehicle that is the subject of a photograph or recorded image was operating the motor vehicle when the photograph or recorded image was obtained through a worksite speed control system. (c) The presumption under subsection (b) does not apply to an owner of a motor vehicle that is a motor vehicle rental company. (d) The owner of a motor vehicle may submit information as determined by the department to rebut the presumption created by subsection (b). (e) It is a defense under this section if any of the following apply: (1) The person receiving a notice of violation issued pursuant to this chapter: (A) was not the owner of the motor vehicle; or (B) was not driving the motor vehicle; at the time that the worksite speed limit was exceeded.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 8-23-32-11Operation of worksite speed control systemsIn force
Sec. 11. (a) The department shall operate a worksite speed control system installed under this chapter only when: (1) highway construction or maintenance is occurring; and (2) workers are present; at a worksite. (b) The department may purchase not more than four (4) worksite speed control systems under the pilot program. (c) The department may operate and monitor not more than four (4) worksites in a single calendar year. (d) Before installing a worksite speed control system, the department shall do the following: (1) Conduct a public information campaign to inform drivers about the use of a worksite speed control system to detect speeds in excess of a worksite speed limit. (2) Post signs indicating that worksite speed limits are monitored by a worksite speed control system before the entrance to a worksite in which a worksite speed control system is in use.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 8-23-32-13Worksite speed control system operators; qualifications; trainingIn force
Sec. 13. (a) The department shall employ worksite speed control system operators to operate a worksite speed control system at a worksite. (b) A worksite speed control system operator must be: (1) an employee of the department or a police officer employed by the state police department; and (2) trained and certified to operate a worksite speed control system under subsection (c). (c) A worksite speed control system operator must complete training by the manufacturer of the worksite speed control system in the procedures for: (1) deploying; (2) testing; and (3) operating; a worksite speed control system. (d) The manufacturer of the worksite speed control system shall issue a certificate of training to a worksite speed control system operator upon the successful completion of the training required under subsection (c).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- IC 8-23-32, Worksite speed control systems (penalty tiers at -18, system cap and worker-presence rule at -11, operator qualification at -13, owner-liability presumption and defenses at -17)(iga.in.gov).gov
- INDOT Safe Zones work-zone speed enforcement pilot, official program page(in.gov).gov
- safezonesin.com, INDOT-directed program FAQ (fines, warnings, civil-penalty status)(safezonesin.com).gov
- INDOT Safe Zones program announcement, payment terms (payment due within 30 days of a violation being mailed; pay online, by phone, or by mail)(safezonesin.com)
- INDOT Safe Zones violations page, penalty tiers (zero-fine warning for a first violation, $75 second, $150 third and subsequent) and payment channels(safezonesin.com)
- INDOT Safe Zones program page, pilot overview (four automated systems, 11 mph threshold, worker-presence requirement, HEA 1015 background)(in.gov)