Utah
Utah Pornography Laws (2026): Age Verification, Penalties, and FSC v. Anderson
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Private adult possession of pornography is legal in Utah, and Utah passed one of the country’s first modern age-verification laws for adult websites, following Louisiana’s 2022 law. That 2023 law, however, survived its court challenge on a legal technicality rather than winning on the merits, which makes Utah's constitutional footing meaningfully different from Texas's. This page covers Utah's obscenity, CSAM, age-verification, and adult-business law.
Is Pornography Legal in Utah?
Utah's pornography-distribution statute, Utah Code § 76-5c-202, criminalizes knowingly bringing pornographic material into the state, preparing, publishing, or possessing it with intent to distribute, distributing or exhibiting it, soliciting its publication, or presenting an obscene performance in an exposed public location. The statute is built around distribution, exhibition, and promotional conduct, not around private possession itself. An adult who owns or privately views material that meets Utah's legal definition of pornographic material, without distributing or exhibiting it, is not committing a crime under this section.
This provision carried the number § 76-10-1204 for decades. Utah's 2025 criminal code recodification moved it to § 76-5c-202, renumbered and amended by Chapter 173 of the 2025 General Session and effective May 7, 2025, with the same elements and the same penalties. Older court opinions, charging documents, and articles still cite the § 76-10-1204 number.
That distinction follows Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states cannot criminalize an adult's private possession of obscene material in their own home. Utah's penalties for a distribution offense are notably severe for a first-tier felony: an adult convicted under § 76-5c-202 faces a third-degree felony with a mandatory minimum fine of $1,000 plus $10 per article distributed, and a mandatory minimum 30 days in jail that a judge cannot suspend. Minors face lesser tiers: a Class A misdemeanor for ages 16 to 17, and a Class B misdemeanor for anyone younger.
Ordinary, non-obscene, adult-only pornography is legal to produce and distribute in Utah. Federal recordkeeping requirements for producers under 18 U.S.C. § 2257 apply separately from, and are not created by, Utah law.
Utah's Age-Verification Law for Adult Websites
Utah was among the first states, after Louisiana, to enact a modern age-verification requirement for pornography websites, through Senate Bill 287 in the 2023 General Session, effective May 3, 2023 and now codified as Utah Code §§ 78B-3-1001 and 78B-3-1002. The law requires a commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or distributes material harmful to minors on a website where that material makes up more than one-third of total content, its "substantial portion" trigger, to use reasonable age-verification methods before granting access. Verification can be satisfied through a state-issued digital ID, an independent third-party verification service checking against commercially available databases, or another commercially reasonable method using transactional data. A site that performs the verification cannot retain the visitor's identifying information after granting access.
As originally enacted, Utah's law was structured differently from most other states' age-verification statutes, in a way that mattered a great deal for how it fared in court: it gave no state agency and no Attorney General any role in enforcing it. Section 78B-3-1003 instead makes a noncompliant commercial entity civilly liable directly to an individual for damages resulting from a minor's accessing the material, including court costs and reasonable attorney fees, and separately liable for improperly retaining identifying data. For the law's first three years, that private suit was the only enforcement route.
That changed in 2026. Utah Code § 78B-3-1004, "Enforcement powers of the division," enacted by Chapter 220 of the 2026 General Session and effective May 6, 2026, directs the Division of Consumer Protection to administer and enforce the chapter in accordance with Title 13, Chapter 2, and allows the division to coordinate with the Office of the Attorney General and the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force in conducting investigations. The division director may impose an administrative fine of up to $2,500 for each violation, and the division may bring an action in court to enforce the chapter, seeking injunctions, disgorgement, civil penalties, and damages. Violating a division order carries a penalty of up to $5,000. Companion sections give the division rulemaking authority and create a safe harbor for age-verification methods the division approves. A state agency now enforces Utah's age-verification law, on top of the private right of action that has always existed.
That original structure is exactly why Utah's law survived its federal court challenge on a narrower basis than Texas's did. In Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson, adult-industry plaintiffs sued Utah's Attorney General and Commissioner of Public Safety, but the Tenth Circuit affirmed dismissal of the case in October 2024, holding that neither official actually enforced or gave effect to the law as it then stood, so the Ex parte Young exception that normally lets a plaintiff sue a state official for an unconstitutional law did not apply, and the state defendants were protected by sovereign immunity. In the court's words, "because neither defendant enforces or gives effect to the Act, Ex parte Young does not apply, and we affirm dismissal." That is a jurisdictional ruling about who can be sued, not a decision on whether the age-verification requirement itself is constitutional. It is a materially weaker form of legal validation than the U.S. Supreme Court's 2025 merits decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which upheld a similar Texas law after actually reaching the First Amendment question. Because the 2026 amendments put an enforcing state agency in place, the specific jurisdictional obstacle that defeated the 2023 suit would not block a future challenge the same way, and Utah's law still has never been tested on the merits the way Texas's has.
Utah's App Store Accountability Act
Utah separately enacted the nation's first App Store Accountability Act, Senate Bill 142, signed March 26, 2025 and originally set to take effect May 6, 2026. This is a distinct law from the pornography age-verification statute above: it requires app-store operators, primarily Apple and Google, to verify a user's age and, for minors, link their account to a parent's for app downloads and purchases, rather than regulating pornography websites directly.

The law's rollout changed substantially in 2026. House Bill 498, signed March 18, 2026, delayed the Act's broader effective date to May 6, 2027 and removed the Utah Attorney General's enforcement authority entirely, leaving only a private right of action for an injured minor or parent. That private action does not come earlier: Utah Code § 13-76-401 provides that "[b]eginning May 6, 2027," only a minor, or that minor's parent, harmed by a violation may sue an app store provider or a developer, the same date on which the duties in §§ 13-76-201 and 13-76-202 themselves begin. A prevailing parent recovers the greater of actual damages or $1,000 per violation, plus reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs. A trade-group lawsuit challenging the original version of SB 142 was voluntarily dismissed on April 21, 2026 specifically because HB 498's amendments addressed the plaintiffs' objections, a dismissal that followed a legislative fix rather than a court ruling on the law's constitutionality.
Utah's CSAM and Harmful-to-Minors Laws
Utah Code § 76-5b-201, sexual exploitation of a minor, makes it a second-degree felony, carrying an indeterminate one-to-15-year prison term, to knowingly possess, view, access with intent to view, or maintain access with intent to view child sexual abuse material. Each minor depicted, and each separate instance of a depiction, can be charged as a separate offense. A conviction requires lifetime sex offender registration. A narrow affirmative defense exists for a defendant who did not solicit the material from the depicted minor, is not more than two years older than that minor, and promptly destroyed the material when asked.
Separately, Utah Code § 76-5c-205, distributing material harmful to minors, covers distributing or exhibiting such material to someone known or believed to be a minor, or producing or participating in a performance harmful to minors in front of one. This section was renumbered from § 76-10-1206 in the same 2025 recodification and last amended by Chapter 26 of the 2026 General Session. An adult's first offense is a third-degree felony with a mandatory minimum $1,000 fine plus $10 per article and 14 days in jail; a prior conviction raises that to a second-degree felony with a $5,000 minimum fine and a one-year minimum sentence. An adult less than seven years older than a 16- or 17-year-old benefits from a close-in-age exception that reduces the charge to a Class A misdemeanor.
Sexting between minors, and the separate legal exposure it creates, is covered on RecordingLaw's Utah sexting laws page. This page addresses Utah's general pornography, CSAM, and age-verification law; the sexting page addresses the sexting-specific charging framework.
Revenge Porn and Non-Consensual Intimate Images in Utah
Utah Code § 76-5b-203, distribution of an intimate image, criminalizes intentionally or knowingly distributing, duplicating, or copying an intimate image of someone 18 or older without their consent, when the actor knows or should know it would cause emotional distress, the image was created or received under circumstances carrying a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the disclosure actually causes emotional distress or harm. A first offense is a Class A misdemeanor, rising to a third-degree felony on a second or later conviction stemming from a separate incident. The statute exempts lawful law enforcement, court, and medical purposes, along with certain internet and hosting service providers that did not intentionally assist the disclosure.
That state law now sits alongside the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act, effective May 19, 2025, which created a separate federal crime for publishing or threatening to publish non-consensual intimate images, including AI-generated forgeries, and requires covered platforms to remove reported images within 48 hours, enforced by the FTC. RecordingLaw's revenge porn laws by state guide covers both layers of protection in more detail.
Public Indecency in Utah
Utah Code § 76-5-419, lewdness, renumbered from § 76-9-702 by Chapter 173 of the 2025 General Session, makes it an offense to engage in sexual intercourse or sodomy, expose genitals, the female breast below the top of the areola, buttocks, anus, or pubic area, masturbate, or commit another lewd act in a public place, or under circumstances likely to cause affront or alarm to a person 14 or older. A first or second conviction is a Class B misdemeanor. It becomes a third-degree felony if the person is a registered sex offender, has two or more prior lewdness convictions, or the act coincides with other aggravating offenses such as being in a sex-designated privacy space not designated for the actor's sex. The statute provides that a woman's breastfeeding, including breastfeeding in any location where she otherwise may rightfully be, does not under any circumstance constitute a lewd act.

Adult Business Taxation in Utah
Utah imposes a state tax specifically on sexually explicit businesses and escort services under Utah Code § 59-27-103. The tax is a flat 10% on amounts a sexually explicit business charges for admission, user fees, retail sales, food and beverage, and any service it provides, and a separate 10% on transaction fees an escort service charges. This is a state tax obligation administered by the Utah State Tax Commission, not a standalone statewide licensing scheme; any local zoning or business-licensing requirements for these establishments are set separately by city or county ordinance.
Penalties for Pornography-Related Offenses in Utah
| Offense | Utah Code | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Distributing pornographic material (adult) | § 76-5c-202 (formerly § 76-10-1204) | 3rd-degree felony, mandatory minimum 30 days + $1,000 fine plus $10/article |
| Distributing material harmful to minors (1st offense) | § 76-5c-205 (formerly § 76-10-1206) | 3rd-degree felony, mandatory minimum 14 days + $1,000 fine plus $10/article |
| Sexual exploitation of a minor (CSAM) | § 76-5b-201 | 2nd-degree felony (1-15 years) |
| Distribution of an intimate image | § 76-5b-203 | Class A misdemeanor (3rd-degree felony on 2nd+ conviction) |
| Lewdness | § 76-5-419 (formerly § 76-9-702) | Class B misdemeanor (up to 3rd-degree felony with priors/aggravators) |
Practical Considerations
Utah's age-verification law for adult websites is enforceable, and since May 6, 2026 the Division of Consumer Protection has had administrative and civil authority to enforce it, so a site's exposure is no longer limited to being sued by a private plaintiff. What has still never happened is a ruling on the merits: the 2024 federal challenge failed on a jurisdictional technicality, because no state official enforced the law at that time, rather than on a holding that the requirement passes First Amendment scrutiny. That is a meaningfully weaker form of legal validation than Texas's law received from the Supreme Court in 2025, and the two should not be described as equivalently "upheld." The App Store Accountability Act's effective date and enforcement mechanism changed substantially during 2026, so its current posture (duties and private suits alike beginning May 6, 2027, AG authority removed) should be stated precisely rather than assumed. Utah also renumbered its core pornography and lewdness offenses in 2025, so a citation to § 76-10-1204, § 76-10-1206, or § 76-9-702 now points to a former numbering rather than the operative section. Federal recordkeeping requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 2257 apply to producers regardless of Utah law, and an employer's device policy or a platform's own terms of service can restrict access to lawful content even where state law does not.

This article provides general legal information about Utah law and is not a substitute for legal advice. Consult an attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Related Utah Resources
More Utah Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to watch porn in Utah?
Yes. Private adult possession and viewing of pornography is legal in Utah. Utah Code § 76-5c-202, renumbered from § 76-10-1204 in 2025, targets distributing, exhibiting, or possessing material with intent to distribute, not simple private possession.
Does Utah require age verification for porn websites?
Yes. Utah Code §§ 78B-3-1001 to -1002, enacted as SB 287, has required commercial adult websites to verify a visitor's age since May 3, 2023. It was among the first laws of its kind in the country, following Louisiana’s Act 440.
Was Utah's age-verification law upheld by a court?
It survived a federal lawsuit, but only on jurisdictional grounds. In Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson, the Tenth Circuit affirmed dismissal in October 2024 because no state official enforced the law at that time, so there was no proper defendant to sue. That is different from a ruling that the law passes First Amendment scrutiny on the merits, which is what happened to Texas's similar law in 2025.
Who enforces Utah's porn age-verification law?
Both a state agency and private plaintiffs. Since May 6, 2026, Utah Code § 78B-3-1004 has directed the Division of Consumer Protection to administer and enforce the law, with administrative fines of up to $2,500 per violation and court actions seeking injunctions, disgorgement, civil penalties, and damages. Separately, under Utah Code § 78B-3-1003, a noncompliant commercial entity is liable directly to an individual for damages resulting from a minor accessing the material, including court costs and reasonable attorney fees. Before May 2026, the private lawsuit was the only route.
What is the penalty for distributing obscene material as an adult in Utah?
A third-degree felony under Utah Code § 76-5c-202, with a mandatory minimum $1,000 fine plus $10 per article and a mandatory minimum 30 days in jail that a judge cannot suspend.
Is possessing child sexual abuse material a felony in Utah?
Yes. Utah Code § 76-5b-201 makes it a second-degree felony, carrying a one-to-15-year indeterminate prison term and lifetime sex offender registration.
What is Utah's revenge porn law?
Utah Code § 76-5b-203 makes nonconsensual distribution of an intimate image a Class A misdemeanor, rising to a third-degree felony on a second or later conviction from a separate incident.
Is the Utah App Store Accountability Act the same as the porn age-verification law?
No. They are separate statutes. The App Store Accountability Act regulates app stores like Apple's and Google's, not pornography websites, and a 2026 amendment delayed it and removed Attorney General authority, so its duties and its private right of action both begin May 6, 2027.
Updates
Updated Utah’s pornography, harmful-to-minors and lewdness citations to their current section numbers following the 2025 recodification, and corrected two stale points: the Division of Consumer Protection has enforced the adult-site age-verification law since May 6, 2026, and the App Store Accountability Act’s private right of action begins May 6, 2027 rather than December 31, 2026.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Utah Code, Title 76: Criminal Offenses
§ 76-5c-202Distributing pornographic material.In force
(1) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5, 76-5c-101, and 76-5c-201 apply to this section. (2) An actor commits distributing pornographic material if the actor knowingly: (a) sends or brings pornographic material into the state with intent to distribute or exhibit the pornographic material to another individual; (b) prepares, publishes, prints, or possesses pornographic material with intent to distribute or exhibit the pornographic material to another individual; (c) distributes or offers to distribute, or exhibits or offers to exhibit, pornographic material to another individual; (d) writes, creates, or solicits the publication or advertising of pornographic material; (e) promotes the distribution or exhibition of material the actor represents to be pornographic; or (f) presents or directs a pornographic performance in a public place or a place exposed to public view or participates in that portion of the performance which makes the performance pornographic.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-15 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 76-5c-205Distributing material harmful to minors.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5, 76-5c-101, and 76-5c-201 apply to this section. (2) An actor commits distributing material harmful to minors if the actor: (a) (i) intentionally distributes or offers to distribute, or exhibits or offers to exhibit, material harmful to minors to an individual; (ii) intentionally produces, performs, or directs any performance, before an individual that is harmful to minors; or (iii) intentionally participates in a performance before an individual that is harmful to minors; and (b) (i) knows or believes the individual described in Subsection (2)(a) is a minor; or (ii) negligently fails to determine if the individual described in Subsection (2)(a) is a minor and the individual is a minor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Also relied on in: Utah Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, Wyoming Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
§ 76-5b-201Sexual exploitation of a minor -- Offenses.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Terms defined in Section 76-1-101.5 apply to this section. (2) An actor commits sexual exploitation of a minor when the actor knowingly possesses, views, accesses with the intent to view, or maintains access with the intent to view, child sexual abuse material. (3) (a) A violation of Subsection (2) is a second degree felony. (b) It is a separate offense under this section: (i) for each minor depicted in the child sexual abuse material; and (ii) for each time the same minor is depicted in different child sexual abuse material.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 17 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Rasabout (Utah Supreme Court 2015, 2015 UT 72)“…v. Rasabout, 2013 UT App 71, ¶ 33, 299 P.3d 625. 5 UTAH CODE § 76-5b-201(1)(a)(ii). 6 Id. § 76-5b-201(3)…”
- State v. Bagnes (Utah Supreme Court 2014, 322 P.3d 719)“…ions. See UTAH CODE § 76-9-702.5 (lewdness) (amended 2011); UTAH CODE § 76-5b-201 (sexual ex- ploitation of a minor) (ame…”
- State v. Roberts (Utah Supreme Court 2015, 779 Utah Adv. Rep. 139)“…rcement officers and employees of exempt organizations. See UTAH CODE § 76-5b-201(6). It did not, however, include an exe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Age of Consent Laws: Statutes, Penalties and Reporting
§ 76-5b-203Distribution of an intimate image -- Penalty.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) (a) As used in this section: (i) "Intimate image" means any visual depiction, photograph, film, video, recording, picture, or computer or computer-generated image, picture, or video, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, that depicts: (A) exposed human male or female genitals or pubic area, with less than an opaque covering; (B) a female breast with less than an opaque covering, or any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; or (C) the individual engaged in any sexually explicit conduct. (ii) "Sexually explicit conduct" means actual or simulated: (A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between individuals of the same or opposite sex; (B) masturbation; (C) bestiality; (D) sadistic or masochistic activities; (E) exhibition of the genitals, pubic region, buttocks, or female breast of any individual; (F) visual depiction of nudity or partial nudity; (G) fondling or touching of the genitals, pubic region, buttocks, or female breast; or (H) visual depiction of defecation or urination for the purpose of causing sexual arousal of any individual.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kitches (Court of Appeals of Utah 2021, 484 P.3d 415)“…etation is necessary to read subsection (3) in harmony with Utah Code section 76-5b-203—colloquially referred to as Utah’s reve…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 76-5-419Lewdness.In force
(1) (a) As used in this section: (i) "Common area of a privacy space" means any area of a privacy space other than: (A) a toilet stall with a closed door; (B) immediately in front of a urinal during use; or (C) a shower stall with a closed door or other closed covering. (ii) "Privacy space" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-12-309. (iii) "Sex-designated" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-12-309. (b) Terms defined in Section 76-1-101.5 apply to this section. (2) Under circumstances not amounting to an offense listed in Subsection (4), an actor commits lewdness if: (a) the actor performs: (i) an act of sexual intercourse or sodomy; (ii) an act exposing the actor's: (A) genitals; (B) female breast below the top of the areola if the actor is female; (C) buttocks, anus, or pubic area; (iii) masturbates; or (iv) any other act of lewdness; and (b) an action described in Subsection (2)(a) is undertaken: (i) in a public place; or (ii) under circumstances which the actor should know will likely cause affront or alarm to, on, or in the presence of another individual who is 14 years old or older.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Utah Code, Title 78B: Judicial Code
§ 78B-3-1002Age verification requirement -- Retention of data -- Exceptions.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) (a) A commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or distributes material harmful to minors on the internet from a website that contains a substantial portion of material harmful to minors shall perform reasonable age verification methods to verify the age of an individual attempting to access the material. (b) There is a rebuttable presumption that a website contains a substantial portion of material harmful to minors if the commercial entity: (i) markets or brands the website as primarily providing material harmful to minors; (ii) uses a website name, domain name, or subdomain that indicates the website primarily provides material harmful to minors; or (iii) advertises or promotes material harmful to minors as a primary feature of the website. (2) A commercial entity or third party that performs the required age verification shall not retain any identifying information of the individual after access has been granted to the material.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson (District Court, D. Utah 2023)“…1 (Compl., Doc. No. 2); see also Utah Code Ann. § 78B-3-1002. 2 (Pls.’ Mot. for Order G…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Age Verification Law: SB 287, SB 73, and the App Store Act, Age Verification Laws by State (2026): All 27 States and Court Status
§ 78B-3-1003Liability for publishers and distributors -- Liability of a parent or guardian for repeated offenses by a minor on school grounds.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A commercial entity that is found to have violated Section 78B-3-1002 shall be liable to an individual for damages resulting from a minor's accessing the material, including court costs and reasonable attorney fees as ordered by the court. (2) A commercial entity that is found to have knowingly retained identifying information of the individual after access has been granted to the individual shall be liable to the individual for damages resulting from retaining the identifying information, including court costs and reasonable attorney fees as ordered by the court. (3) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(f), if a person suffers damages from a minor committing the same offense repeatedly on school grounds for an offense in Title 76, Criminal Offenses, or Title 80, Utah Juvenile Code, the person may bring a cause of action against a parent or guardian with legal custody of the minor to recover costs and damages caused by the repeated offense. (b) The parent or guardian is not liable for costs or damages under Subsection (3)(a) if the parent or guardian made a reasonable effort to supervise and direct the minor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 78B-3-1001Definitions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in this chapter: (1) "Commercial entity" includes corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, limited partnerships, sole proprietorships, or other legally recognized entities. (2) "Commission" means the State Tax Commission described in Section 59-1-201. (3) "Digitized identification card" means a data file available on any mobile device which has connectivity to the internet through a state-approved application that allows the mobile device to download the data file from a state agency or an authorized agent of a state agency that contains all of the data elements visible on the face and back of a license or identification card and displays the current status of the license or identification card. (4) "Distribute" means to issue, sell, give, provide, deliver, transfer, transmute, circulate, or disseminate by any means. (5) "Division" means the Division of Consumer Protection created in Section 13-2-1. (6) "Internet" means the international computer network of both federal and non-federal interoperable packet switched data networks.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2024, 119 F.4th 732)“…equirements (the Act), 2023 Utah Laws Ch. 262 (codified at Utah Code Ann. §§ 78B-3-1001 to -1002). The Act allows private parti…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 78B-3-1004Enforcement powers of the division.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) The division shall administer and enforce the provisions of this chapter, in accordance with Title 13, Chapter 2, Division of Consumer Protection. (2) The division may coordinate with the Office of the Attorney General and the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force in conducting investigations under this section. (3) (a) In addition to the division's enforcement powers under Title 13, Chapter 2, Division of Consumer Protection: (i) the division director may impose an administrative fine of up to $2,500 for each violation of this chapter; and (ii) the division may bring an action in court to enforce a provision of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Utah Code, Title 59: Revenue and Taxation
§ 59-27-103Tax imposed on a sexually explicit business -- Tax imposed on an escort service.In force
(1) A tax is imposed on a sexually explicit business equal to 10% of amounts paid to or charged by the sexually explicit business for the following transactions: (a) an admission fee; (b) a user fee; (c) a retail sale of tangible personal property made within the state; (d) a sale of: (i) food and food ingredients as defined in Section 59-12-102; or (ii) prepared food as defined in Section 59-12-102; (e) a sale of a beverage; and (f) any service. (2) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (2)(b), a tax is imposed on an escort service equal to 10% of amounts paid or charged by the escort service for any transaction that involves providing an escort to another individual. (b) Notwithstanding Subsection (2)(a), the tax imposed by Subsection (2)(a) does not apply to a transaction that is subject to the tax imposed in Subsection (1). (3) The tax imposed by this section: (a) may not be imposed on any sales and use tax collected or paid under Chapter 12, Sales and Use Tax Act; and (b) is subject to an agreement sales and use tax under Chapter 12, Sales and Use Tax Act. (4) The commission shall administer this chapter in accordance with Chapter 12, Part 1, Tax Collection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2009
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bushco v. Utah State Tax Commission (Utah Supreme Court 2009, 643 Utah Adv. Rep. 23)“…ercent gross receipts tax on sexually explicit businesses. Utah Code Ann. § 59-27-103 (2008). It defines a sexually explicit…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2257Record keeping requirementsIn forcecited in 34 of our articles
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which— contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce; shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 68 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (1998) affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction against section 2257. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012) reviewed it as content neutral under intermediate scrutiny, a standard the Third Circuit later replaced with strict scrutiny.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…rformers with independent penalties for failure to comply. 18 U. S. C. §§ 2257 (a) and (i) (1988 ed. and Supp. V); Am…”
- Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1998, 154 F.3d 281)✓A swingers magazine that ran readers' sexually explicit ads challenged section 2257's age record and labeling duties; the court treated the statute as content neutral, found no substantial likelihood of First Amendment success, and affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction.
- Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2012, 677 F.3d 519)✓Adult film producers, photographers and sex educators challenged section 2257's recordkeeping duties; the court held the statutes content neutral and found they advance protecting children, but vacated dismissal of the First and Fourth Amendment claims for record development.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), West Virginia Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras and Privacy Violations, Illinois Pornography Laws (2026): Legality & No AV Law Yet
Utah Code, Title 13: Commerce and Trade
§ 13-76-201App store provider requirements.In force
(1) Beginning May 6, 2027, an app store provider shall: (a) at the time an individual who is located in the state creates an account with the app store provider, or for an existing account, within 12 months after the day on which the obligations described in this section take effect: (i) request age category information from the individual; and (ii) verify the individual's age category using commercially available methods that are reasonably designed to ensure accuracy, which for a minor shall include affirmative age attestation by a parent together with other age information collected as part of the creation or use of an account; (b) if the age verification method or process described in Subsection (1)(a) determines the individual is a minor: (i) require the account to be affiliated with a parent account; and (ii) obtain verifiable parental consent from the holder of the affiliated parent account before allowing the minor to: (A) download an app; (B) purchase an app; or (C) make an in-app purchase; (c) after receiving notice of a significant change from a developer: (i) notify the account holder of the significant change; and (ii) for a minor account: (A) notify the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 13-76-202Developer requirements.In force
(1) Beginning May 6, 2027, a developer shall: (a) verify through the app store's data sharing methods: (i) the age category data of account holders located in the state; and (ii) for a minor account, whether verifiable parental consent has been obtained; (b) notify app store providers of a significant change to the app; and (c) request age category data or parental consent: (i) at the time an account holder: (A) downloads an app; (B) purchases an app; or (C) launches a pre-installed application for the first time; (ii) when implementing a significant change to the app; or (iii) to comply with applicable laws or regulations. (2) Beginning May 6, 2027, a developer may request age category data: (a) no more than once during each 12-month period to verify: (i) accuracy of age category data associated with an account holder; or (ii) continued account use within the verified age category; (b) when there is reasonable suspicion of: (i) account transfer; or (ii) misuse outside the verified age category; or (c) at the time an account holder creates a new account with the developer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 13-76-401Enforcement.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) (a) Beginning May 6, 2027, only a minor, or the parent of that minor, who has been harmed by a violation of Subsection 13-76-201(2) may bring a civil action against an app store provider. (b) Beginning May 6, 2027, only a minor, or the parent of that minor, who has been harmed by a violation of Subsection 13-76-202(4) may bring a civil action against a developer. (2) In an action described in Subsection (1), the court shall award a prevailing parent: (a) the greater of: (i) actual damages; or (ii) $1,000 for each violation; (b) reasonable attorney fees; and (c) litigation costs.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Also relied on in: App Store Age Verification Laws: All 4 States Compared (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Utah Code § 76-10-1204 (distributing pornographic material)(law.justia.com)
- Utah Code § 76-10-1206 (dealing in material harmful to a minor)(law.justia.com)
- Utah Code § 76-5b-201 (sexual exploitation of a minor)(law.justia.com)
- Utah Code § 76-5b-203 (distribution of an intimate image)(law.justia.com)
- Utah Code § 76-9-702 (lewdness)(law.justia.com)
- Utah Code § 59-27-103 (sexually explicit business and escort service tax)(law.justia.com)
- S.B. 287, Online Pornography Viewing Age Requirements, Enrolled Copy, 2023 General Session (enacting Utah Code §§ 78B-3-1001, -1002)(le.utah.gov).gov
- Free Speech Coalition v. Anderson, No. 23-4104 (10th Cir. Oct. 1, 2024)(law.justia.com)
- Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)(law.cornell.edu)
- Utah Code § 76-5c-202 (distributing pornographic material; renumbered from § 76-10-1204 by Ch. 173, 2025 General Session)(le.utah.gov)
- Utah Code § 76-5c-205 (distributing material harmful to minors; renumbered from § 76-10-1206)(le.utah.gov)
- Utah Code § 76-5-419 (lewdness; renumbered from § 76-9-702 by Ch. 173, 2025 General Session)(le.utah.gov)
- Utah Code § 78B-3-1004 (enforcement powers of the Division of Consumer Protection; enacted by Ch. 220, 2026 General Session, effective May 6, 2026)(le.utah.gov)
- Utah Code § 78B-3-1003 (liability of publishers and distributors for failure to verify age)(le.utah.gov)
- Utah Code § 13-76-401 (App Store Accountability Act enforcement; private civil action beginning May 6, 2027)(le.utah.gov)