Washington
Washington Minimum Wage 2026: $17.13 Statewide and Local Rates
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 30, 2026). · 13 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Washington's statewide minimum wage is $17.13 an hour in 2026, more than double the federal minimum wage of $7.25. The rate is set by the Minimum Wage Act, RCW 49.46.020, and it is adjusted every January 1 for inflation. Washington does not allow employers to count tips toward the minimum wage, so tipped workers receive the full rate before tips.
Many Washington workers are owed more than the state rate. Seattle, unincorporated King County, SeaTac, Tukwila, Renton, Burien, Everett and Bellingham each set a higher local minimum wage, and RCW 49.46.120 leaves those more favorable local standards in place. Seattle and unincorporated King County have already published their 2027 rates. The statewide 2027 rate has not been announced at the time of this writing.
Information last verified on September 30, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers the Washington Minimum Wage Act (RCW chapter 49.46), L&I's published rates, verified local minimum wages, and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overlay. It does not cover overtime calculation, other states, or local paid sick leave and other labor standards.
What is the minimum wage in Washington in 2026?
The statewide minimum wage is $17.13 an hour. L&I's minimum wage page states: "The 2026 minimum wage in the state of Washington is $17.13 per hour." It took effect January 1, 2026.
L&I's page lists no statewide tiers by employer size, region or industry. The state rate is the same everywhere in Washington, but as the table below shows, several cities and one county set higher rates that override it for work performed there. A worker in one of those places should look at the local rate first.
What will Washington's minimum wage be in 2027?
Washington has not announced its statewide 2027 rate as of September 30, 2026. RCW 49.46.020(2)(b) directs L&I to calculate the adjusted rate each September 30, using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the twelve months prior to each September 1, calculated to the nearest cent. The new rate takes effect the following January 1.
L&I's minimum wage page says: "The new minimum wage will be announced on Sept. 30, and take effect Jan. 1." When this page was last verified, that page still displayed the 2026 rate of $17.13 and L&I's homepage carried no 2027 minimum wage item. The section as reviewed states no cap on the increase.
Any figure for the 2027 statewide rate that circulates before L&I publishes it is an estimate. This page will be updated with L&I's number.
Local minimum wages in Washington
RCW 49.46.120 provides that the Minimum Wage Act is in addition to and supplementary to any other federal, state or local law or ordinance, and that standards more favorable to employees are not affected. L&I confirms the practical result: some local jurisdictions have higher minimum wage rates and different labor rules than Washington State. State law does not preempt a higher local rate.

The table below lists 2026 rates from L&I's local minimum wage rates list, with the city's own page used where it was reached. Many local rates depend on the employer's size, so confirm which tier applies to you.
| Locality | 2026 rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Seattle | $21.30 | All employers pay the same rate since January 1, 2025, according to the city. |
| Unincorporated King County | $20.82 (500 or more employees); $19.82 (15 or fewer employees with $2 million or more in revenue, and 16 to 499 employees at any revenue); $18.32 (15 or fewer employees and under $2 million in revenue) | Applies to work in unincorporated areas, not to cities inside the county. |
| SeaTac | $20.74 | Hospitality and transportation industries only. |
| Tukwila | $21.65 | Employers with 15 or more employees worldwide and a Tukwila nexus, or over $2 million in Tukwila gross revenue, or large-network franchisees. Check the city's definitions. |
| Renton | $21.57 for employers with more than 500 employees; $20.57 from January 1 to June 30, 2026, then $21.57 from July 1, 2026, for employers with 15 to 500 | Employers with 14 or fewer employees are not covered. |
| Burien | $21.78 (501 or more employees); $20.78 (16 to 500 employees); $19.28 (15 or fewer employees) | Rates as adjusted by the city on June 4, 2026 under BMC Chapter 5.16; L&I's list still shows older figures, so check the city's page. |
| Everett | $20.77 (more than 500 employees in Washington); for 15 to 499 employees, $18.77 from January 1 to June 30, 2026 and $19.77 from July 1 to December 31, 2026 | Employers with 14 or fewer employees are not affected. |
| Bellingham | $19.13 | The city's page describes its rate as the state rate plus $2.00. |
L&I keeps the complete, current list on its local minimum wage rates page, and cities not shown here may also have local rules. This page makes no claim about a city that is not in the table.
Announced 2027 local rates
Two localities have published 2027 rates on their own official pages.
| Locality | 2027 rate | Effective |
|---|---|---|
| Seattle | $22.14 | January 1, 2027 |
| Unincorporated King County | $21.57 (employers with 15 or fewer employees and under $2 million in revenue: $19.57) | January 1, 2027 |
Seattle's Office of Labor Standards lists the rates for both 2026 and 2027 in one table. King County states: "Starting January 1, 2027, the minimum wage for work done in unincorporated King County will be $21.57 per hour."
For the others, no 2027 rate had been found when this page was last verified. Tukwila's and Everett's pages showed no 2027 figure. Burien's page gives a formula for 2027 (prior year plus CPI, with medium employers at the large-employer rate and small employers $2.00 below it), and the city publishes the figure by October 15. Bellingham's rate is tied to the state rate, so it cannot be set until the state announces. SeaTac and Renton were not confirmed on their own pages.
Tipped workers: no tip credit
Washington does not allow a tip credit. RCW 49.46.020(3) requires an employer to pay its employees all tips and gratuities and all service charges, and says that tips and service charges paid to an employee are in addition to, and may not count towards, the employee's hourly minimum wage. L&I repeats this: businesses may not use tips and service charges paid to an employee as part of an employee's hourly minimum wage.

So a server, bartender or delivery worker in Washington must receive at least $17.13 an hour (or the higher local rate) in wages, and every tip on top of that.
Federal law is different. The FLSA lets an employer pay a tipped employee a cash wage as low as $2.13 an hour if tips bring the total to $7.25 and the employee retains all tips. That option does not help a Washington employer, because the state rate and the ban on counting tips control.
Youth and other lower rates
L&I lists minors 14 to 15 years old as a group that may be paid no less than 85 percent of the minimum wage. RCW 49.46.020(5) directs the director of L&I to set by regulation the minimum wage for employees under 18; the general rate in RCW 49.46.020(2) applies to employees who have reached 18. Under WAC 296-125-081 (effective July 1, 2026), 16- and 17-year-olds must be paid the full adult minimum wage, and workers under 16 no less than 85 percent of it.
L&I also says employers can pay some workers less than the state minimum wage, including workers who meet certain criteria and workers in jobs exempt from the Minimum Wage Act. It adds that most agricultural and non-agricultural jobs qualify for the minimum wage. The specific exemptions were not reviewed for this page, so check L&I before assuming a job is exempt.
How the federal minimum wage fits in
The federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour under 29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)(C). The FLSA does not lower a higher state or local rate. Section 218(a) of Title 29 says that nothing in the FLSA excuses noncompliance with any federal or state law or municipal ordinance establishing a higher minimum wage, and the U.S. Department of Labor states that where state law requires a higher minimum wage, that higher standard applies. For a Washington worker the practical rule is: the highest of the federal, state and local rates applies. For more on federal coverage and exemptions, see the federal minimum wage guide.
Filing a minimum wage complaint in Washington
L&I takes workplace rights complaints from workers owed wages, including minimum wage and overtime, tips and service charges, or paid sick leave, and from workers who were retaliated against. L&I says a wage complaint should be filed within three years of when the violation occurred, and retaliation complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged retaliatory action.
- Private action. RCW 49.46.090(1) makes an employer liable for the full amount due, less any amount actually paid, plus costs and the reasonable attorney's fees the court allows. The director of L&I may take an assignment of the claim under RCW 49.46.090(2).
- Retaliation. RCW 49.46.100(2) forbids discharging or discriminating against an employee for making a wage complaint. Violations are a gross misdemeanor under RCW 49.46.100.
- Double damages. A separate statute, RCW 49.52.070, provides for twice the wages unlawfully withheld, plus costs and attorney fees, for willful withholding under RCW 49.52.050(1) and (2). It is not available to an employee who knowingly submitted to the violation. Whether it applies to a particular minimum wage claim depends on the facts.
The federal remedy is separate. Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b), an employer that violates the federal minimum wage owes the unpaid wages plus an equal amount as liquidated damages, and the court allows a reasonable attorney's fee. Federal claims generally must be brought within two years, or three years for a willful violation. For the wider process of collecting wages you are owed, see unpaid wages. This page does not state the limitations period for a private lawsuit under the Minimum Wage Act.
Common mistakes about Washington pay
Believing tipped workers can be paid a lower cash wage. They cannot. Tips do not count toward the hourly minimum wage.
Assuming the state rate is what everyone in the Seattle area earns. Several localities have higher rates, and those apply to work performed there.
Treating the 2027 statewide rate as known. L&I had not published it when this page was last verified.
Related pages
- Minimum wage by state
- Federal minimum wage rules
- Washington final paycheck laws
- Washington at-will employment laws
- Recovering unpaid wages
- Overtime calculator
- Neighboring states: Oregon minimum wage, Idaho minimum wage
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information, not legal advice. It reflects the Washington Minimum Wage Act (RCW chapter 49.46), Washington Department of Labor & Industries publications, local ordinances as described on official city and county pages, and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act as verified on September 30, 2026. Wage rules change, and your situation may turn on facts not covered here. For advice about a specific situation, consult a lawyer licensed in Washington or contact the Washington Department of Labor & Industries.
Last updated: September 30, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the minimum wage in Washington state in 2026?
It is $17.13 an hour, effective January 1, 2026, according to the Department of Labor & Industries and RCW 49.46.020.
What will Washington's minimum wage be in 2027?
The statewide rate had not been announced when this page was last verified. L&I says it announces the new rate on September 30 and that it takes effect January 1; RCW 49.46.020(2)(b) ties it to CPI-W.
What is the minimum wage in Seattle in 2026 and 2027?
Seattle's rate is $21.30 in 2026 and $22.14 starting January 1, 2027, according to the Seattle Office of Labor Standards.
What is the minimum wage in unincorporated King County in 2027?
King County states it will be $21.57 an hour starting January 1, 2027, or $19.57 for employers with 15 or fewer employees and under $2 million in revenue.
Which Washington cities have their own minimum wage?
L&I's list for 2026 includes Seattle, unincorporated King County, SeaTac (hospitality and transportation), Tukwila, Renton, Burien, Everett and Bellingham. L&I keeps the full current list.
Does Washington have a tipped minimum wage?
No. RCW 49.46.020(3) says tips and service charges may not count toward the hourly minimum wage, so tipped workers receive the full minimum wage before tips.
Can a 14- or 15-year-old be paid less than the Washington minimum wage?
L&I lists minors 14 to 15 years old at no less than 85 percent of the minimum wage. Workers who are 16 or 17 must receive the full adult rate (WAC 296-125-081).
Can a city set a higher minimum wage than Washington state?
Yes. RCW 49.46.120 says the Minimum Wage Act is supplementary to local ordinances and that more favorable standards are not affected, and L&I notes some jurisdictions have higher rates.
Is Washington's minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage?
Yes. The federal rate is $7.25 an hour, and under 29 U.S.C. 218(a) a higher state minimum wage still applies.
How do I file a minimum wage complaint in Washington?
File a workplace rights complaint with L&I. Retaliation complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged retaliatory action. RCW 49.46.090 also allows a worker to sue for the amount due, costs and attorney's fees.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Code of Washington
§ 49.46.020Minimum hourly wage—Paid sick leave.In force
(1)(a) Beginning January 1, 2017, and until January 1, 2018, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees who has reached the age of eighteen years wages at a rate of not less than eleven dollars per hour. (b) Beginning January 1, 2018, and until January 1, 2019, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees who has reached the age of eighteen years wages at a rate of not less than eleven dollars and fifty cents per hour. (c) Beginning January 1, 2019, and until January 1, 2020, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees who has reached the age of eighteen years wages at a rate of not less than twelve dollars per hour. (d) Beginning January 1, 2020, and until January 1, 2021, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees who has reached the age of eighteen years wages at a rate of not less than thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour. (2)(a) Beginning on January 1, 2021, and each following January 1st as set forth under (b) of this subsection, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees who has reached the age of eighteen years wages at a rate of not less than the amount established under (b) of this subsection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 49.46.090Payment of amounts less than chapter requirements—Employer's liability—Assignment of claim.In force
(1) Any employer who pays any employee less than the amounts to which such employee is entitled under or by virtue of this chapter, shall be liable to such employee affected for the full amount due to such employee under this chapter, less any amount actually paid to such employee by the employer, and for costs and such reasonable attorney's fees as may be allowed by the court. Any agreement between such employee and the employer allowing the employee to receive less than what is due under this chapter shall be no defense to such action. (2) At the written request of any employee paid less than the amounts to which he or she is entitled under or by virtue of this chapter, the director may take an assignment under this chapter or as provided in RCW 49.48.040 of such claim in trust for the assigning employee and may bring any legal action necessary to collect such claim, and the employer shall be required to pay the costs and such reasonable attorney's fees as may be allowed by the court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 49.46.010Definitions. (Effective until July 1, 2027.)In forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in this chapter: (1) "Coercion" means a threat to compel or induce a person to engage in conduct which the person has a legal right to abstain from, or to abstain from conduct in which the person has a legal right to engage in; (2) "Director" means the director of labor and industries; (3) "Employ" includes to permit to work; (4) "Employee" includes any individual employed by an employer but shall not include: (a) Any individual (i) employed as a hand harvest laborer and paid on a piece rate basis in an operation which has been, and is generally and customarily recognized as having been, paid on a piece rate basis in the region of employment; (ii) who commutes daily from his or her permanent residence to the farm on which he or she is employed; and (iii) who has been employed in agriculture less than thirteen weeks during the preceding calendar year; (b) Any individual employed in casual labor in or about a private home, unless performed in the course of the employer's trade, business, or profession; (c) Any individual employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity or in the capacity of outside salesperson as those terms are defined and…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 128 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp. (Washington Supreme Court 2004, 151 Wash. 2d 853)“…compensation due to an employee by reason of employment.” RCW 49.46.010(2). To support their opposing positio…”
- Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Washington Supreme Court 2012, 174 Wash. 2d 851)“…(2003)). ¶27 The MWA defines the term “employee.” Under RCW 49.46.010(3), “ ‘[e]mployee’ includes any individ…”
- Berrocal v. Fernandez (Washington Supreme Court 2005, 155 Wash. 2d 585)“…call, and not engaged in the performance of active duties.” RCW 49.46.010(5)(j). Petitioners Western Range Associ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Washington Supreme Court Strikes Down Live-In Caregiver Wage Exemption
§ 49.46.060Exceptions for learners, apprentices, messengers, persons with disabilities.In force
Subject to RCW 49.46.170, the director, to the extent necessary in order to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment, shall by regulations provide for (1) the employment of learners, of apprentices, and of messengers employed primarily in delivering letters and messages, under special certificates issued pursuant to regulations of the director, at such wages lower than the minimum wage applicable under RCW 49.46.020 and subject to such limitations as to time, number, proportion, and length of service as the director shall prescribe, and (2) the employment of individuals whose earning capacity is impaired by a disability, under special certificates issued by the director, at such wages lower than the minimum wage applicable under RCW 49.46.020 and for such period as shall be fixed in such certificates.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 49.46.005Declaration of necessity and police power—Conformity to modern fair labor standards.In force
(1) Whereas the establishment of a minimum wage for employees is a subject of vital and imminent concern to the people of this state and requires appropriate action by the legislature to establish minimum standards of employment within the state of Washington, therefore the legislature declares that in its considered judgment the health, safety and the general welfare of the citizens of this state require the enactment of this measure, and exercising its police power, the legislature endeavors by this chapter to establish a minimum wage for employees of this state to encourage employment opportunities within the state. The provisions of this chapter are enacted in the exercise of the police power of the state for the purpose of protecting the immediate and future health, safety and welfare of the people of this state. (2) Since the enactment of Washington's original minimum wage act, the legislature and the people have repeatedly amended this chapter to establish and enforce modern fair labor standards, including periodically updating the minimum wage and establishing the forty-hour workweek and the right to overtime pay.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 49.46.100Prohibited acts of employer—Penalty.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Any employer who hinders or delays the director or his or her authorized representatives in the performance of his or her duties in the enforcement of this chapter, or refuses to admit the director or his or her authorized representatives to any place of employment, or fails to make, keep, and preserve any records as required under the provisions of this chapter, or falsifies any such record, or refuses to make any record accessible to the director or his or her authorized representatives upon demand, or refuses to furnish a sworn statement of such record or any other information required for the proper enforcement of this chapter to the director or his or her authorized representatives upon demand, or pays or agrees to pay an employee less than the employee is entitled to under this chapter, or otherwise violates any provision of this chapter or of any regulation issued under this chapter shall be deemed in violation of this chapter and shall, upon conviction therefor, be guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hume v. American Disposal Co. (Washington Supreme Court 1994, 124 Wash. 2d 656)“…view this case on certification from Division Two. I RCW 49.46.100 prohibits employer retaliation against…”
- Hayes v. Trulock (Court of Appeals of Washington 1988, 51 Wash. App. 795)“…wrongfully discharged them from their jobs, in violation of RCW 49.46.100(2). 1 The employees furthe…”
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company (Washington Supreme Court 1984, 102 Wash. 2d 219)“…welfare), RCW 49.17.160 (industrial safety and health act), RCW 49.46.100 (minimum wage act), RCW 49.44.090 (viol…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Washington Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
§ 49.46.120Chapter establishes minimum standards and is supplementary to other laws—More favorable standards unaffected.In force
This chapter establishes minimum standards for wages, paid sick leave, and working conditions of all employees in this state, unless exempted herefrom, and is in addition to and supplementary to any other federal, state, or local law or ordinance, or any rule or regulation issued thereunder. Any standards relating to wages, hours, paid sick leave, or other working conditions established by any applicable federal, state, or local law or ordinance, or any rule or regulation issued thereunder, which are more favorable to employees than the minimum standards applicable under this chapter, or any rule or regulation issued hereunder, shall not be affected by this chapter and such other laws, or rules or regulations, shall be in full force and effect and may be enforced as provided by law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Filo Foods, LLC v. City of SeaTac (Washington Supreme Court 2015, 183 Wash. 2d 770)“…pplicable state law that we must consider is RCW 49.46.120, part of the Washington Minimum Wage Ac…”
- Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co. (Washington Supreme Court 2000, 139 Wash. 2d 824)“…s and working conditions of all employees in this state[.]” RCW 49.46.120. By contrast, the statute, which…”
- Weeks v. Chief of Washington State Patrol (Washington Supreme Court 1982, 96 Wash. 2d 893)“…(National League of Cities v. Usery, supra; see RCW 49.46.120), and the 1975 proviso does not apply t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 49.52.050Rebates of wages—False records—Penalty.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Any employer or officer, vice principal or agent of any employer, whether said employer be in private business or an elected public official, who (1) Shall collect or receive from any employee a rebate of any part of wages theretofore paid by such employer to such employee; or (2) Wilfully and with intent to deprive the employee of any part of his or her wages, shall pay any employee a lower wage than the wage such employer is obligated to pay such employee by any statute, ordinance, or contract; or (3) Shall wilfully make or cause another to make any false entry in any employer's books or records purporting to show the payment of more wages to an employee than such employee received; or (4) Being an employer or a person charged with the duty of keeping any employer's books or records shall wilfully fail or cause another to fail to show openly and clearly in due course in such employer's books and records any rebate of or deduction from any employee's wages; or (5) Shall wilfully receive or accept from any employee any false receipt for wages; Shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 243 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc. (Washington Supreme Court 1998, 136 Wash. 2d 152)“…1996) (citing from chapters 49.46 and 49.48 RCW, and noting RCW 49.52.050 in discussing the statutory scheme of s…”
- Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co. (Washington Supreme Court 1994, 124 Wash. 2d 749)“…mages for benefits unlawfully withheld under RCW 49.46.010, RCW 49.52.050 and .070, which together provide that a…”
- Rekhter v. Department of Social & Health Services (Washington Supreme Court 2014, 180 Wash. 2d 102)“…ms that DSHS (1) wrongfully withheld wages, in violation of RCW 49.52.050 and .070 and (2) failed to pay the prov…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Washington Final Paycheck Laws: No Acceleration, Real Penalties
§ 49.52.070Civil liability for double damages.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Any employer and any officer, vice principal or agent of any employer who shall violate any of the provisions of RCW 49.52.050 (1) and (2) shall be liable in a civil action by the aggrieved employee or his or her assignee to judgment for twice the amount of the wages unlawfully rebated or withheld by way of exemplary damages, together with costs of suit and a reasonable sum for attorney's fees: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That the benefits of this section shall not be available to any employee who has knowingly submitted to such violations.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 212 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc. (Washington Supreme Court 2007, 153 P.3d 846)“…orney fees pursuant to RCW 49.46.090(1), RCW 49.48.030, and RCW 49.52.070. The trial court granted summary judgme…”
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc. (Washington Supreme Court 1998, 136 Wash. 2d 152)“…nt to Schilling on her claim for double damages pursuant to RCW 49.52.070, which provides for such damages when a…”
- Chelan County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of Chelan (Washington Supreme Court 1987, 109 Wash. 2d 282)“…court doubled this amount as exemplary damages pursuant to RCW 49.52.070. After adding interest on the amount of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 29
§ 206Minimum wageIn forcecited in 49 of our articles
Every employer shall pay to each of his employees who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, wages at the following rates: except as otherwise provided in this section, not less than— $5.85 an hour, beginning on the 60th day after May 25, 2007; $6.55 an hour, beginning 12 months after that 60th day; and $7.25 an hour, beginning 24 months after that 60th day; if such employee is a home worker in Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands, not less than the minimum piece rate prescribed by regulation or order; or, if no such minimum piece rate is in effect, any piece rate adopted by such employer which shall yield, to the proportion or class of employees prescribed by regulation or order, not less than the applicable minimum hourly wage rate. Such minimum piece rates or employer piece rates shall be commensurate with, and shall be paid in lieu of, the minimum hourly wage rate applicable under the provisions of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 6,250 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j) (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1999, 184 F.3d 236)“…wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206 (a), for the work he was compelled to d…”
- Christensen v. Harris County (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 529 U.S. 576)“…in the private sector of the economy or the public sector. 29 U. S. C. §§ 206 , 207 (1994 ed. and Supp. III). In 1985…”
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1981, 450 U.S. 728)“…a minimum wage under § 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U. S. C. § 206 , may not be waived through a collectiv…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Formula, the 6-Year Consumer Debt Rule, and Repossession, Federal Minimum Wage 2026: $7.25 an Hour Since 2009, Minimum Wage by State 2026: All 50 States and DC
§ 216PenaltiesIn forcecited in 46 of our articles
Any person who willfully violates any of the provisions of section 215 of this title shall upon conviction thereof be subject to a fine of not more than $10,000, or to imprisonment for not more than six months, or both. No person shall be imprisoned under this subsection except for an offense committed after the conviction of such person for a prior offense under this subsection. Any employer who violates the provisions of section 206 or section 207 of this title shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid overtime compensation, as the case may be, and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages. Any employer who violates the provisions of section 215(a)(3) or 218d of this title shall be liable for such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to effectuate the purposes of section 215(a)(3) or 218d of this title, including without limitation employment, reinstatement, promotion, and the payment of wages lost and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 9,526 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):The Supreme Court treats Section 216(b) as the FLSA's private-suit clause. Alden v. Maine (1999) held Article I gives Congress no power to subject nonconsenting states to such private damages suits in their own courts. Christensen v. Harris County (2000) applied Section 216(b)'s requirement that plaintiffs prove a Section 207 violation.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 421 U.S. 240)“…abor Standards Act, § 16 (b), 52 Stat. 1069 , as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 216 (b); Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers…”
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper (Supreme Court of the United States 1980, 447 U.S. 752)“…ther taxable costs. Compare 42 U. S. C. § 2000a-3 (b) with 29 U. S. C. § 216 (b) (1970 ed., Supp. V).” Id., at 6…”
- Hutto v. Finney (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 437 U.S. 678)“…ther taxable costs. Compare 42 U. S. C. § 2000a-3 (b) with 29 U. S. C. § 216 (b) (1970 ed., Supp. V). [29] See…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Federal Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report, Unpaid Wages: How to File a Claim and Recover What You're Owed, Employer Threatening to Call Immigration? Your Rights in the U.S.
§ 218Relation to other lawsIn forcecited in 52 of our articles
No provision of this chapter or of any order thereunder shall excuse noncompliance with any Federal or State law or municipal ordinance establishing a minimum wage higher than the minimum wage established under this chapter or a maximum work week lower than the maximum workweek established under this chapter, and no provision of this chapter relating to the employment of child labor shall justify noncompliance with any Federal or State law or municipal ordinance establishing a higher standard than the standard established under this chapter. No provision of this chapter shall justify any employer in reducing a wage paid by him which is in excess of the applicable minimum wage under this chapter, or justify any employer in increasing hours of employment maintained by him which are shorter than the maximum hours applicable under this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 312 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Philip Williamson Itzik Riefronda Kirlin Thomas Painter,plaintiffs-Appellants v. General Dynamics Corporation,opinion (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2000, 208 F.3d 1144)“…wage, hour, and child labor legislation. See 29 U.S.C. § 218 (a). 1 *1151…”
- United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., Irving Jacobson and Albert Klinghoffer (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 1961, 285 F.2d 487)“…agreement to accept reduced pay is valid, notwithstanding 29 U.S.C. § 218 . White v. Witwer Grocer Co., 8 Cir.,…”
- Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1990, 918 F.2d 1409)“…han the maximum workweek established under this chapter. 29 U.S.C. Section 218 (a). The employees and the United State…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Minimum Wage 2026: $7.25 Federal, No State Rate, Alaska Minimum Wage 2026: $14.00 an Hour, $15.00 in July 2027, Arizona Minimum Wage 2026: $15.15 Per Hour, $15.65 in 2027
§ 255Statute of limitationsIn forcecited in 39 of our articles
Any action commenced on or after May 14, 1947, to enforce any cause of action for unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime compensation, or liquidated damages, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act 1 See References in Text note below. — if the cause of action accrues on or after May 14, 1947 —may be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrued, and every such action shall be forever barred unless commenced within two years after the cause of action accrued, except that a cause of action arising out of a willful violation may be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrued; if the cause of action accrued prior to May 14, 1947 —may be commenced within whichever of the following periods is the shorter: (1) two years after the cause of action accrued, or (2) the period prescribed by the applicable State statute of limitations; and, except as provided in paragraph (c), every such action shall be forever barred unless commenced within the shorter of such two periods; if the cause of action accrued prior to May 14, 1947, the action shall not be barred by paragraph (b)…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,924 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 528 U.S. 62)“…added to the statute of limitations provision of the FLSA, 29 U. S. C. § 255 , a new subsection (d), which suspended…”
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 441 U.S. 750)“…title shall apply to actions under this chapter." Title 29 U. S. C. § 255 provides in relevant part: "Any acti…”
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don Schupak (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1993, 991 F.2d 583)“…o a more generous three-year statute of limitations. See 29 U.S.C. § 255 (a) (1988) (three-year statute of limit…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wage Theft in the U.S.: Your Rights Regardless of Immigration Status, Independent Contractor vs. Employee: The IRS, DOL and ABC Tests, Arkansas Minimum Wage 2026: $11.00 an Hour, Tip Credit Rules
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Washington L&I: Minimum Wage(lni.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 49.46.020 (minimum wage; tips; minors)(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- Washington L&I: Local Minimum Wage Rates(lni.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 49.46.120 (relation to other laws)(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- Seattle Office of Labor Standards: Minimum Wage(seattle.gov).gov
- King County: Unincorporated King County Minimum Wage(kingcounty.gov).gov
- City of Bellingham: City Minimum Wage(cob.org)
- City of Burien: Minimum Wage(burienwa.gov).gov
- Washington L&I: Worker Rights Complaints(lni.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 49.46.090 (civil action)(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. 218 (relation to other laws)(law.cornell.edu)
- U.S. Department of Labor: Minimum Wage FAQ(dol.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. 206 (federal minimum wage)(law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 216 (penalties and civil remedies)(law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 255 (statute of limitations)(law.cornell.edu)
- WAC 296-125-081 (minimum wages for minors)(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 49.46.100 (prohibited acts; penalty)(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 49.52.070 (civil liability for double damages)(app.leg.wa.gov).gov