Kansas
Kansas Identity Theft Laws
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Kansas treats identity theft as a severity level 8, nonperson felony under K.S.A. § 21-6107, escalating to a severity level 5 felony once the victim's loss exceeds $100,000. Kansas also gives its Attorney General an unusual statutory authority: to directly assist identity theft victims, within available resources, with tasks most other states leave entirely to the victim, from getting fraudulent charges refunded to completing identity-theft affidavits.
This page covers Kansas's identity theft and identity fraud statute and its penalty structure, the state's minor and protected-consumer credit freeze law, the Attorney General's statutory assistance role, and Kansas's general restitution rule. For the federal rights that apply everywhere, see our identity theft laws hub.
Kansas's Identity Theft and Identity Fraud Statute
K.S.A. § 21-6107 defines two distinct offenses. Identity theft is obtaining, possessing, transferring, using, selling, or purchasing any personal identifying information belonging to or issued to another person, with the intent to defraud that person or anyone else, or to receive any benefit. Identity fraud is using or supplying information the person knows to be false to obtain identifying documents, or altering or counterfeiting identifying documents, with intent to deceive. The statute defines «personal identifying information» broadly, covering names, dates of birth, addresses, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, financial account information, and passwords or login credentials that can access a person's personal electronic content. Notably, knowledge of whether the identifying information belongs to a living or a deceased person is not a defense to either offense.
Identity theft is a severity level 8, nonperson felony as a base offense. That classification rises to a severity level 5, nonperson felony, a substantially more serious tier, once the monetary loss to the victim or victims exceeds $100,000. Identity fraud carries a severity level 8, nonperson felony classification in all cases, with no value-based enhancement found in the statute.
Kansas's Minor and Protected-Consumer Credit Freeze Law
Kansas has its own security freeze statute as part of the Kansas Fair Credit Reporting Act, K.S.A. § 50-701 et seq. K.S.A. § 50-725 requires a consumer reporting agency to place a freeze for a protected consumer within 30 days of a request from the protected consumer's authorized representative, with proper identification and proof of authority, bars release of the protected consumer's report while frozen, and bars any fee for the service.

The Kansas Attorney General's own consumer page states that minors under age 16 have been eligible for a security freeze since January 1, 2017, ahead of the 2018 federal baseline (15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1(j)), and that general adult security freezes became free statewide as of July 1, 2018. The precise statutory section defining the «protected consumer» age threshold was not independently located during this page's research, so the under-16 figure here reflects the Attorney General's official guidance rather than a directly quoted definitions statute.
The Kansas Attorney General's Authority to Assist Victims
Kansas gives its Attorney General a specific statutory role that goes beyond simply taking complaints. K.S.A. § 50-6,139a authorizes the Attorney General's office, within available resources, to directly assist identity theft victims with obtaining refunds for fraudulent or unauthorized charges, canceling fraudulent accounts, correcting false information in consumer reports and in personnel or court records, obtaining security freezes, completing identity-theft affidavits, and filing related complaints.
The Attorney General's consumer protection page instructs victims to first contact local law enforcement to file a police report, then report the theft to the Attorney General's office. The page also directs victims to ReportFraud.ftc.gov or 1-877-IDTHEFT, lists contact information for the three major credit bureaus, points to AnnualCreditReport.com, and links the FTC's «Taking Charge» recovery publication.
Restitution and Civil Remedies
Kansas's general restitution statute, K.S.A. § 21-6604, applies broadly to sentencing in criminal cases. Subsection (b)(1) directs that the court shall order the defendant to pay restitution, which includes but is not limited to damage or loss caused by the defendant's crime. The unworkability exception sits separately, at subsections (b)(4) and (b)(5): restitution is due immediately unless the court allows a specified time or installment schedule, or finds compelling circumstances that would render restitution unworkable in whole or in part, and a court making that finding must state its reasons on the record in detail. For an identity theft or identity fraud conviction under § 21-6107 specifically, subsection (b)(2)(A) goes further: it expressly expands what counts as recoverable damage or loss to include attorney fees and costs incurred to repair the victim's credit history or rating, and to satisfy a debt, lien, or other obligation incurred because the victim's personal identification documents were obtained and used in the offense. That identity-theft-specific expansion is on top of, not instead of, the general restitution rule.

Kansas also gives identity theft victims a dedicated civil hook. K.S.A. § 50-6,139, part of what the statute itself names the «Wayne Owen act» alongside the Attorney General assistance section above, declares that the conduct prohibited by § 21-6107 constitutes an unconscionable act or practice in violation of K.S.A. § 50-627, the Kansas Consumer Protection Act. For purposes of applying KCPA remedies and penalties, subsection (b) deems the person who committed the conduct the «supplier» and the victim the «consumer», and provides that proof of a consumer transaction is not required, which removes the usual obstacle for a victim who never dealt with the perpetrator commercially. That shortcut is written for identity theft; for a scam that did not involve your identity, the KCPA question works differently, and our guide to Kansas scam and fraud laws explains how. The KCPA's private remedies section, K.S.A. § 50-634, lets a consumer aggrieved by a violation of the act bring a civil action. How these provisions apply to a specific case is a question for a Kansas-licensed attorney.
Free Help First, Optional Alerts After
A credit freeze at Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion is free in Kansas for adults and protected minors, and the Attorney General's office can, within available resources, help victims with freezes, refunds, and affidavits. If you also want ongoing alerts for your own identity, Aura offers three-bureau credit monitoring, alerts if your Social Security number is found on the dark web, and identity theft insurance.
Explore Aura's FeaturesAffiliate disclosure: if you sign up through this link we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
The Federal Layer
Kansas's own protections sit alongside the federal baseline available to every state. Since 2018, federal law has required free credit freezes and free freeze removals nationwide. A fraud alert placed with one credit bureau is shared with the other two, lasts one year by default, and extends to seven years once you have filed an FTC Identity Theft Report. Under FCRA § 605B (15 U.S.C. § 1681c-2), a victim with an identity theft report can get specific fraudulent information blocked from a credit report. IdentityTheft.gov, the FTC's free recovery site, builds a personalized recovery plan and, for account holders, pre-fills the letters and forms most victims need. See our guide to reporting identity theft and our comparison of credit freezes versus fraud alerts for more.
If You Are a Victim of Identity Theft in Kansas
File a police report with local law enforcement first, then report the theft to the Kansas Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division, which can directly help with refunds, canceling accounts, correcting records, and freezes under its statutory authority. Report to the FTC through IdentityTheft.gov as well, and place a freeze with all three major credit bureaus, which is free for both adults and protected minors under Kansas and federal law alike.

Information last verified on 2026-08-13, drawn directly from K.S.A. §§ 21-6107, 50-725, 50-6,139, 50-6,139a, and 21-6604, and the Kansas Attorney General's consumer protection page. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
- Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
- How to Report Identity Theft
- Credit Freeze vs. Fraud Alert
- Child Identity Theft: Warning Signs, Credit Checks, and the Minor Freeze Right
Last updated: 2026-08-13.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is identity theft a felony in Kansas?
Yes. K.S.A. 21-6107 makes identity theft a severity level 8, nonperson felony as a base offense, rising to a severity level 5, nonperson felony once the victim's loss exceeds $100,000. Identity fraud is a severity level 8, nonperson felony in all cases.
What is the difference between identity theft and identity fraud in Kansas?
Identity theft is obtaining, possessing, transferring, using, selling, or purchasing another person's personal identifying information to defraud them or receive a benefit. Identity fraud is using false information to obtain identifying documents, or altering or counterfeiting identifying documents, with intent to deceive.
Can the Kansas Attorney General help me get fraudulent charges refunded?
Yes. K.S.A. 50-6,139a authorizes the Attorney General, within available resources, to directly assist victims with obtaining refunds, canceling fraudulent accounts, correcting false information in consumer reports, obtaining security freezes, and completing identity-theft affidavits.
Since when has Kansas offered a free minor credit freeze?
The Kansas Attorney General's office states that minors under 16 have been eligible for a security freeze since January 1, 2017, ahead of the 2018 federal baseline, and that general adult freezes became free statewide on July 1, 2018.
Is restitution mandatory in a Kansas identity theft case?
Kansas's general restitution statute, K.S.A. 21-6604, directs at subsection (b)(1) that the court shall order the defendant to pay restitution for damage or loss caused by the crime. Restitution is due immediately unless the court allows a specified time or installment schedule, or finds compelling circumstances that would render it unworkable in whole or in part, a finding the court must state on the record in detail. For an identity theft conviction specifically, subsection (b)(2)(A) expands recoverable restitution to include attorney fees and costs to repair the victim's credit history or rating and to satisfy a debt, lien, or other obligation incurred through the identity theft.
Where do I report identity theft in Kansas?
File a police report with local law enforcement, then report to the Kansas Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division and to the FTC through IdentityTheft.gov.
Updates
Corrected the civil remedies section: Kansas does have an identity-theft-specific civil hook, K.S.A. 50-6,139 (the Wayne Owen act), which makes conduct prohibited by the identity theft statute an unconscionable act under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, and clarified how the unworkability exception in the restitution statute actually operates.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 21: CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
§ 21-6107Identity theft; identity fraud.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Identity theft is obtaining, possessing, transferring, using, selling or purchasing any personal identifying information, or document containing the same, belonging to or issued to another person, with the intent to: (1) Defraud that person, or anyone else, in order to receive any benefit; or (2) misrepresent that person in order to subject that person to economic or bodily harm. (b) Identity fraud is: (1) Using or supplying information the person knows to be false in order to obtain a document containing any personal identifying information; or (2) altering, amending, counterfeiting, making, manufacturing or otherwise replicating any document containing personal identifying information with the intent to deceive; (c) (1) Identity theft is a: (A) Severity level 8, nonperson felony, except as provided in subsection (c)(1)(B); and (B) severity level 5, nonperson felony if the monetary loss to the victim or victims is more than $100,000. (2) Identity fraud is a severity level 8, nonperson felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Valdiviezo-Martinez (2021) held an employee can commit identity theft under K.S.A. 21-6107 by deceiving an employer with another’s Social Security number to obtain employment and its benefits, that the offense is continuing, and that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague. Warsame (2025) applied those elements.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Valdiviezo-Martinez (Supreme Court of Kansas 2021, 486 P.3d 1256)✓A restaurant worker used another man's Social Security number on his W-4 and drew paychecks for years; the court held he obtained a benefit by deceiving his employer even though he earned the wages, called 21-6107 a continuing offense, and affirmed.
- In re Wrongful Conviction of Warsame (Supreme Court of Kansas 2025, 563 P.3d 1281)✓Warsame used stolen credit cards to buy gift cards, and his identity theft convictions were vacated for naming the wrong victim; the court held wrongful conviction compensation turns on the statutory elements of 21-6107, which he admitted meeting, so his claim failed.
- State v. Garcia (Supreme Court of Kansas 2017)✓Garcia used another person's Social Security number on tax forms when hired at a restaurant; the Kansas Supreme Court reversed his 21-6107 conviction as expressly preempted because that number also appeared on his federal I-9, a holding the U.S. Supreme Court reversed in 2020.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026), Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
§ 21-6604Authorized dispositions; crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993.In force
(a) Whenever any person has been found guilty of a crime, the court may adjudge any of the following: (1) Commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary of corrections if the current crime of conviction is a felony and the sentence presumes imprisonment, or the sentence imposed is a dispositional departure to imprisonment; or, if confinement is for a misdemeanor, to jail for the term provided by law; (2) impose the fine applicable to the offense and may impose the provisions of subsection (q); (3) release the defendant on probation if the current crime of conviction and criminal history fall within a presumptive nonprison category or through a departure for substantial and compelling reasons subject to such conditions as the court may deem appropriate. In felony cases, the court may include confinement in a county jail not to exceed 60 days, which need not be served consecutively, as a condition of an original probation sentence; (4) assign the defendant to a community correctional services program as provided in K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 52 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Younger (Supreme Court of Kansas 2025, 564 P.3d 744)“…51 Restitution K.S.A. 21-6604(b)(1) states that, in addition to other…”
- State v. Wilson (Supreme Court of Kansas 2024, 552 P.3d 1228)“…ion for as long as restitution remains unpaid. 2. K.S.A. 21-6604(b)(1)'s provision that "the court shall…”
- State v. Vaughn (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2020, 58 Kan. App. 2d 585)“…hority for the court to impose a consecutive sentence under K.S.A. 21-6604(f)(4)." As…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 50: UNFAIR TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
§ 50-6,139aAttorney general assistance for victims of identity-related crimes.In force
(a) Within the limits of available resources, the attorney general may assist victims of identity theft, identity fraud and related crimes and violations in obtaining refunds in relation to fraudulent or unauthorized charges or debits, canceling fraudulent accounts, correcting false information in consumer reports caused by identity theft or identity fraud, correcting false information in personnel files and court records, obtaining security freezes, completing identity theft affidavits, filing complaints and related matters. (b) This section shall be part of and supplemental to the Kansas consumer protection act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
§ 50-6,139Identity theft; identity fraud; unconscionable act or practice; citation of act.In force
(a) The conduct prohibited by K.S.A. 21-6107, and amendments thereto, constitutes an unconscionable act or practice in violation of K.S.A. 50-627, and amendments thereto, and any person who engages in such conduct shall be subject to the remedies and penalties provided by the Kansas consumer protection act. (b) For the purposes of the remedies and penalties provided by the Kansas consumer protection act: (1) The person committing the conduct prohibited by K.S.A. 21-6107, and amendments thereto, shall be deemed the supplier, and the person who is the victim of such conduct shall be deemed the consumer; and (2) proof of a consumer transaction shall not be required. (c) This section shall be part of and supplemental to the Kansas consumer protection act. (d) The provisions of this section and K.S.A. 50-6,139a and 50-6,139b, and amendments thereto, shall be known and may be cited as the Wayne Owen act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
§ 50-725Security freeze for protected consumers; requirements; procedure.In force
(a) A consumer reporting agency shall place a security freeze for a protected consumer if the consumer reporting agency receives a request from the protected consumer's representative for the placement of the security freeze and the protected consumer's representative: (1) Submits the request to the consumer reporting agency at the address or other point of contact and in the manner specified by the consumer reporting agency; (2) provides to the consumer reporting agency sufficient proof of identification of the protected consumer and the representative; and (3) provides to the consumer reporting agency sufficient proof of authority to act on behalf of the protected consumer. (b) If a consumer reporting agency does not have a record pertaining to a protected consumer when the consumer reporting agency receives a request under subsection (a), the consumer reporting agency shall create a record for the protected consumer. (c) Within 30 days after receiving a request that meets the requirements of subsection (a), a consumer reporting agency shall place a security freeze for the protected consumer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
§ 50-627Unconscionable acts and practices.In force
(a) No supplier shall engage in any unconscionable act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction. An unconscionable act or practice violates this act whether it occurs before, during or after the transaction. (b) The unconscionability of an act or practice is a question for the court. In determining whether an act or practice is unconscionable, the court shall consider circumstances of which the supplier knew or had reason to know, such as, but not limited to the following that: (1) The supplier took advantage of the inability of the consumer reasonably to protect the consumer's interests because of the consumer's physical infirmity, ignorance, illiteracy, inability to understand the language of an agreement or similar factor; (2) when the consumer transaction was entered into, the price grossly exceeded the price at which similar property or services were readily obtainable in similar transactions by similar consumers; (3) the consumer was unable to receive a material benefit from the subject of the transaction; (4) when the consumer transaction was entered into, there was no reasonable probability of payment of the obligation in full by the consumer; (5) the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 105 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kelly v. Vinzant (Supreme Court of Kansas 2008, 287 Kan. 509)“…0-626 and unconscionable acts and practices in violation of K.S.A. 50-627.” Nevertheless, the Court of App…”
- Corral v. Rollins Protective Services Co. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1987, 240 Kan. 678)“…der K.S.A. 50-639, Corral also asserts he is claiming under K.S.A. 50-627 in that the agreement constituted an un…”
- Golden v. Den-Mat Corp. (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2012, 47 Kan. App. 2d 450)“…ranties amounted to an unconscionable act or practice under K.S.A. 50-627 in violation of the KCPA. That’s only b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 50-634Private remedies.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Whether a consumer seeks or is entitled to damages or otherwise has an adequate remedy at law or in equity, a consumer aggrieved by an alleged violation of this act may bring an action to: (1) Obtain a declaratory judgment that an act or practice violates this act; or (2) enjoin or obtain a restraining order against a supplier who has violated, is violating or is likely to violate this act. (b) A consumer who is aggrieved by a violation of this act may recover, but not in a class action, damages or a civil penalty as provided in subsection (a) of K.S.A. 50-636 and amendments thereto, whichever is greater. (c) Whether a consumer seeks or is entitled to recover damages or has an adequate remedy at law, a consumer may bring a class action for declaratory judgment, an injunction and appropriate ancillary relief, except damages, against an act or practice that violates this act. (d) A consumer who suffers loss as a result of a violation of this act may bring a class action for the damages caused by an act or practice: (1) Violating any of the acts or practices specifically proscribed in K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 92 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLC (Supreme Court of Kansas 2009, 289 Kan. 1185)“…xists under the plaintiffs’ common-law theory of damages. K.S.A. 50-634(e) provides: “(e) Except for services…”
- York v. InTrust Bank, N.A. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1998, 265 Kan. 271)“…ulings are sufficient to justify the award of damages under K.S.A. 50-634(b) and attorney fees pursuant to K.S.A.…”
- Finstad v. Washburn University (Supreme Court of Kansas 1993, 252 Kan. 465)“…s to show a causal link because the recovery provided under K.S.A. 50-634(b) is for consumers “aggrieved b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Age Verification Law: SB 394 Requirements Explained, Kansas Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
§ 50-701Findings and purpose.In force
(a) The legislature of the state of Kansas hereby finds and determines that: (1) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system. (2) An elaborate mechanism has been developed for investigating and evaluating the credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, and general reputation of consumers. (3) Consumer reporting agencies have assumed a vital role in assembling and evaluating consumer credit and other information on consumers. (4) There is a need to insure that consumer reporting agencies exercise their grave responsibilities with fairness, impartiality, and a respect for the consumer's right to privacy. (b) It is the purpose of K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2004
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Peasley v. Telecheck of Kansas, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Kansas 1981, 6 Kan. App. 2d 990)“…irst claim was brought under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, K.S.A. 50-701 et seq., the second was un…”
- Burdett v. Harrah's Kansas Casino Corp. (District Court, D. Kansas 2003, 294 F. Supp. 2d 1215)“…gambling debt. The Kansas Fair Credit Reporting Act, K.S.A. §§ 50-701 et seq., is virtually iden…”
- Lowe v. Experian (District Court, D. Kansas 2004, 328 F. Supp. 2d 1122)“…S.C. §§ 1681 , et seq. 2 . K.S.A. 50-701, et seq. 3…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- K.S.A. § 21-6107, Identity theft; identity fraud(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. § 50-725, Security freeze for protected consumer report(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. § 50-6,139a, Attorney general; assistance to identity theft victims(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. § 21-6604, Restitution (subsection (b)(2)(A) identity-theft-specific expansion)(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- Office of Kansas Attorney General, Your Identity (Consumer Protection Division)(ag.ks.gov).gov
- Kansas Legislature, 2025-2026 Session Measures(kslegislature.gov).gov
- IdentityTheft.gov (Federal Trade Commission)(identitytheft.gov).gov
- K.S.A. § 50-6,139, Identity theft; identity fraud; unconscionable act or practice (Wayne Owen act)(ksrevisor.gov)
- K.S.A. § 50-634, Kansas Consumer Protection Act; private remedies(ksrevisor.gov)