Arizona
Arizona Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arizona has a dedicated juvenile sexting law, A.R.S. 8-309, that treats minor-to-minor sexting as a petty offense to Class 2 misdemeanor rather than a felony. Adults who sext with minors face prosecution under the sexual exploitation statute, A.R.S. 13-3553, a Class 2 felony.
Arizona Teen Sexting Law (A.R.S. 8-309)
Arizona enacted A.R.S. 8-309, titled "Unlawful use of an electronic communication device by a minor," to specifically address the issue of teens sharing explicit images. This statute applies only to juveniles (persons under 18) and provides a legal framework separate from the harsh adult child pornography laws. It recognizes that teenagers often lack the maturity to understand the long-term ramifications of their digital actions.

Under this law, it is unlawful for a juvenile to intentionally or knowingly:
- Transmit or Display: Use an electronic device to send or show a visual depiction of a minor that contains explicit sexual material.
- Possess: Have a visual depiction of a minor with explicit sexual material that was sent to them via an electronic device.
Definitions of Prohibited Material
The statute relies on specific definitions to determine what constitutes "explicit sexual material." Under A.R.S. 13-3501 and related statutes, this includes material depicting:
- Human Genitalia: Any exhibition of the genitals or pubic area.
- Nudity: The showing of the human male or female genitals, pubic area, or buttocks with less than a full opaque covering, or the showing of the female breast with less than a fully opaque covering of any portion thereof below the top of the nipple.
- Sexual Activity/Conduct: Acts of masturbation, sexual intercourse, or physical contact with a person's clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast.
- Sexual Excitement: The condition of human male or female genitals when in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal.
This broad definition means that a "nude selfie" showing female breasts or male genitals clearly falls under the statute, regardless of whether the intent was artistic, romantic, or sexual.
Penalties for Teen Sexting
The penalties under A.R.S. 8-309 are tiered based on the nature of the act (sending vs. possessing) and whether it is a repeat offense. Unlike adult felonies, these are generally classified as petty offenses or misdemeanors.
Transmission (Sending)
The law distinguishes between sending an image to a single boyfriend/girlfriend versus sharing it widely.
| Action | Classification | Typical Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Sending/Displaying to ONE person | Petty Offense | Fine, education classes, community service |
| Sending/Displaying to MORE THAN ONE person | Class 3 Misdemeanor | Juvenile court disposition: probation, counseling, community service, fines, and detention in serious cases |
A.R.S. 8-309 sets no detention or fine maximum of its own, and the adult misdemeanor caps in A.R.S. 13-707 and 13-802 do not govern a juvenile case. A juvenile adjudicated delinquent is disposed of under A.R.S. 8-341(A)(1)(b), which lets the court award the juvenile to a probation department "including a period of incarceration in a juvenile detention center of not more than one year." That one-year ceiling is the same whatever the offense class, so the classification drives charging posture and record consequences more than it caps time in custody.
Possession (Receiving)
Mere possession of explicit material received electronically is classified as a petty offense. This is the lowest level of offense in Arizona law. While a petty offense is the least serious classification Arizona uses, it still brings the juvenile under the jurisdiction of the court, which can order mandated counseling, community service, and "consequence" classes.
Repeat Offenses
The law gets significantly stricter for repeat offenders. If a juvenile has a prior adjudication (conviction) for violating this section, or has completed a diversion program for a prior violation, any new violation becomes a Class 2 misdemeanor under A.R.S. 8-309(F). The higher class matters for the record and for how seriously the court treats the case, but it does not set the detention ceiling: as noted above, a juvenile disposition runs under A.R.S. 8-341(A)(1)(b), not under the adult misdemeanor caps.
Defenses and Exceptions
Arizona law encourages responsible behavior. A.R.S. 8-309(C) provides a specific statutory defense for possession charges. A juvenile is not in violation of the possession law if all of the following apply:
-
No Solicitation: The juvenile did not ask for, request, or solicit the visual depiction. Responsible Action: The juvenile took reasonable steps to either:
-
Destroy or eliminate the visual depiction (delete it).
-
Report the visual depiction to a parent, guardian, school official, or law enforcement official.
This defense is crucial. It protects teens who receive unwanted images ("cyberflashing") from being prosecuted, provided they handle the situation correctly. It effectively creates a "safe harbor" for reporting.
Important Note: This defense does not apply if the juvenile keeps the image, shows it to friends, or forwards it to anyone else (even to make fun of it).
Child Pornography Laws (A.R.S. 13-3553)
While A.R.S. 8-309 handles minor cases, the state's primary child pornography statute is A.R.S. 13-3553, "Sexual exploitation of a minor." This is one of the most severe laws in the Arizona criminal code.
A person violates this law if they intentionally or knowingly:
- Produce, publish, or direct a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
- Possess or view such a depiction.
- Distribute, transport, or trade such depictions.
Penalties and the Under-Fifteen Threshold
Every violation of A.R.S. 13-3553 is a Class 2 felony. How it is sentenced then turns on the age of the depicted minor. A.R.S. 13-3553(C) reads: "Sexual exploitation of a minor is a class 2 felony and if the minor is under fifteen years of age it is punishable pursuant to section 13-705."
- Depicted minor under fifteen: Sentencing runs under A.R.S. 13-705, the Dangerous Crimes Against Children statute. That regime carries mandatory prison, consecutive sentences across counts, and no probation, pardon, or early release. Exposure here can reach decades.
- Depicted minor fifteen, sixteen, or seventeen: The offense stays a Class 2 felony, but it is sentenced under the ordinary felony ranges rather than under 13-705, and probation is available to the judge.
Either way it is a felony prosecution carrying sex offender registration and a permanent record. The under-fifteen line is what separates a case with a mandatory-prison floor from one a court can resolve with probation, so it is the first fact a defense attorney will pin down.
Note for Minors: Prosecutors have discretion. While A.R.S. 8-309 is the preferred statute for teen sexting, a prosecutor could theoretically charge a juvenile under A.R.S. 13-3553 in extreme cases (e.g., coercion, blackmail, wide distribution, or profit). This possibility serves as a severe deterrent against malicious behavior.
Adults Sexting With Minors
The "teen sexting" law (A.R.S. 8-309) only applies when the defendant is a juvenile. An adult (18+) who sexts with a minor faces full felony prosecution.
If an adult sends or receives explicit images of a minor, they can be charged with:
- Sexual Exploitation of a Minor (A.R.S. 13-3553): As described above, a Class 2 felony.
- Luring a Minor for Sexual Exploitation (A.R.S. 13-3554): Attempting to persuade a minor to engage in sexual conduct or create explicit images.
No "Romeo and Juliet" Exception for Child Pornography: There is no exception in Arizona law for an adult possessing child pornography, even if the minor was a willing participant or a romantic partner. If an 18-year-old senior dates a 17-year-old junior and receives a nude photo, the 18-year-old is technically committing a Class 2 felony. Because the depicted minor is seventeen, that charge falls outside the 13-705 Dangerous Crimes Against Children regime described above, so it is sentenced under the ordinary Class 2 felony ranges and probation is available. It remains a felony prosecution with registration exposure.
Revenge Porn Laws (A.R.S. 13-1425)
Arizona has a strict law against "revenge porn," codified at A.R.S. 13-1425 and officially titled "Unlawful disclosure of images depicting states of nudity or specific sexual activities; classification; definitions." This law applies to everyone, adults and minors alike, though minors would likely be prosecuted in juvenile court.
It is unlawful to intentionally disclose an explicit image of another person if:
- The depicted person is identifiable.
- The disclosure is made without the depicted person's consent.
- The disclosure is made with the intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce the depicted person.
- The depicted person had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Penalties
- Class 5 Felony: Standard violation.
- Class 4 Felony: If the disclosure is made by electronic means (which covers almost all sexting and internet cases).
- Class 1 Misdemeanor: Under A.R.S. 13-1425(C)(2), if a person threatens to disclose but does not actually disclose an image that would violate the section, or if the image is a "realistic pictorial representation." Threatening to leak a nude photo in order to pressure an ex is charged at this lower level, but it is still a crime.
This is a significant felony charge. It means that sharing a nude photo of an ex-partner to embarrass them is not a prank or "drama." It is a major crime that can lead to prison time and a permanent felony record.
Civil Liability for Parents
Beyond criminal charges, sexting can destroy family finances. Arizona law holds parents financially responsible for their children's malicious acts.
Under A.R.S. 12-661, parents or legal guardians are jointly and severally liable for any malicious or willful misconduct of a minor that results in injury to another person. This liability is capped at $10,000 per tort.
However, this $10,000 cap is just for the statutory liability. If a parent was negligent (e.g., they knew their child was harassing others and did nothing to stop it), they could be sued for unlimited damages under common law negligence theories. Victims of revenge porn or harassment often sue for emotional distress, invasion of privacy, and reputational damage.
School Consequences
Schools play a major role in policing sexting. Even if an incident happens off-campus on a weekend, schools can often take disciplinary action if the conduct causes a "substantial disruption" to the school environment.
School Policies
Most Arizona school districts follow policies from the Arizona School Boards Association (ASBA). These policies typically classify sexting as "Harassment," "Bullying," or "Use of Technology" violations.
Potential Penalties
- Suspension: Short-term (1-10 days) or long-term.
- Expulsion: Permanent removal from the district.
- Sports Bans: Removal from athletic teams or extracurricular activities (which can impact college scholarships).
- Alternative School: Transfer to a disciplinary alternative education program.
Furthermore, school officials are mandatory reporters. If they confiscate a phone and find explicit images of minors, they are legally required to turn the evidence over to law enforcement.
Juvenile Court Process
If a teen is charged under A.R.S. 8-309, the case typically goes through the juvenile justice system, which focuses on rehabilitation.
Diversion
For first-time offenders charged with a petty offense or minor misdemeanor, the county attorney often offers "diversion." This is an agreement where the prosecutor agrees not to file formal charges if the juvenile completes specific requirements, such as:
- Sexting Education: Classes that teach the legal and social risks of sexting.
- Community Service: 10-20 hours of volunteer work.
- Fines: Monetary penalties.
- Apology Letters: Written apologies to victims or parents.
If diversion is successfully completed, the juvenile effectively has no criminal record for the incident. This is the ideal outcome.
Adjudication
If the juvenile is a repeat offender or the crime is serious (e.g., revenge porn), the case goes to court. If found "delinquent" (guilty), the judge has wide discretion. Consequences can include:
- Standard Probation: Regular check-ins with a probation officer, drug testing, curfews, and search clauses.
- Intensive Probation (JIPS): House arrest, strict monitoring, and frequent surveillance.
- Detention: Confinement in a juvenile detention center (juvenile jail).
- Placement: Removal from the home to a group home or treatment facility.
Sex Offender Registration
A major concern for parents is whether their child will be labeled a sex offender. Under Arizona law:
- A.R.S. 8-309 Convictions: Generally do not require sex offender registration. The statute was explicitly designed to avoid this lifelong stigma for teenagers making foolish mistakes.
- A.R.S. 13-3553 (Child Pornography) Convictions: Do require registration. If a juvenile is charged and adjudicated under the adult-level felony statute (which is rare for simple sexting but possible), they could be forced to register.
This difference highlights why it is critical to have a defense attorney ensure charges are filed under the appropriate juvenile statute (8-309) rather than the general felony statute.
Long-Term Consequences
Even without sex offender registration, a juvenile record can have lasting impacts:
- Digital Footprint: Images shared electronically can rarely be completely deleted. They may resurface years later on "revenge porn" sites or social media, affecting future relationships and employment.
- Background Checks: While juvenile records are generally sealed to the public, they are visible to law enforcement, courts, and certain government agencies. They can disqualify a person from military service or security clearances.
- College Admissions: Disciplinary actions by schools (suspensions/expulsions) often must be reported on college applications.
More Arizona Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is sexting a felony in Arizona?
For minors charged under the specific teen sexting law (A.R.S. 8-309), it is typically a petty offense or a misdemeanor. However, for adults,or minors charged under general exploitation laws,it can be a Class 2 felony or Class 4 felony (revenge porn).
Can I get in trouble for receiving a sext I didn't ask for?
Technically, possession is a petty offense under A.R.S. 8-309(B). However, A.R.S. 8-309(C) provides a defense if you did not solicit it AND you either delete it or report it. If you keep it, show it to others, or asked for it, you can be charged.
Do I have to register as a sex offender?
If adjudicated solely under A.R.S. 8-309, you typically do not have to register. If charged with sexual exploitation of a minor (13-3553) or luring, registration is likely required.
What happens if I send a photo to just my boyfriend/girlfriend?
If you are both minors, this is still technically illegal under A.R.S. 8-309(A). It would likely be a petty offense (transmission to one person). Arizona does not have a specific "Romeo and Juliet" exemption that makes the act legal, but the penalties are much lower than for adults.
Can parents be held responsible?
Parents are generally not criminally liable for their child's crimes unless they assisted. However, under A.R.S. 12-661, parents can be civilly liable for up to $10,000 in damages if their child committed a "malicious or willful" act, and potentially more under general negligence claims.
What if the image is fake or AI-generated?
Arizona addresses this directly. A.R.S. 13-1425(D)(5) defines a "realistic pictorial representation" as an image created or modified to reasonably appear to be an actual image of an identifiable person in a state of nudity or engaged in specific sexual activities that did not actually occur, and A.R.S. 13-1425(C)(2) makes disclosing one a class 1 misdemeanor rather than a felony. A.R.S. 13-1425(A)(2) adds that the reasonable-expectation-of-privacy element does not apply to a realistic pictorial representation unless the depicted person created or modified it. Separately, if the image depicts a real minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the child exploitation statutes apply no matter how the file was produced.
Can school officials look through my phone?
School officials generally need "reasonable suspicion" that a school rule or law has been violated to search a student's phone. If they find evidence of sexting, they are often mandatory reporters required to contact law enforcement.
What should you do if you or your child is accused of sexting?
Consult an Attorney: Find a lawyer experienced in Arizona juvenile law immediately. Preserve Evidence: Do not delete everything immediately if an investigation has started, as this can be "tampering with evidence." Ask your lawyer first. Be Honest with Counsel: Tell your lawyer exactly what happened so they can determine if the "unsolicited receipt" defense applies.
Updates
Corrected the Arizona sexting page against the current statutes: fixed the official title and added the missing class 1 misdemeanor tier of A.R.S. 13-1425, clarified that the Dangerous Crimes Against Children sentencing regime under A.R.S. 13-3553 applies only when the depicted minor is under fifteen, updated the deepfake guidance to reflect Arizona's express realistic-pictorial-representation provisions, and replaced adult misdemeanor jail and fine caps with the juvenile disposition rule in A.R.S. 8-341(A)(1)(b).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 8 (Child Safety), Chapter 3 (JUVENILE OFFENDERS), Article 1 (General Procedures for Delinquency and Incorrigibility Proceedings)
§ 8-309Unlawful use of an electronic communication device by a minor; classification; definitionsIn force
A. It is unlawful for a juvenile to intentionally or knowingly use an electronic communication device to transmit or display a visual depiction of a minor that depicts explicit sexual material. B. It is unlawful for a juvenile to intentionally or knowingly possess a visual depiction of a minor that depicts explicit sexual material and that was transmitted to the juvenile through the use of an electronic communication device. C. It is not a violation of subsection B of this section if all of the following apply: 1. The juvenile did not solicit the visual depiction. 2. The juvenile took reasonable steps to destroy or eliminate the visual depiction or report the visual depiction to the juvenile's parent, guardian, school official or law enforcement official. D. A violation of subsection A of this section is a petty offense if the juvenile transmits or displays the visual depiction to one other person. A violation of subsection A of this section is a class 3 misdemeanor if the juvenile transmits or displays the visual depiction to more than one other person. E. A violation of subsection B of this section is a petty offense. F.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 13 (Criminal Code), Chapter 35.1 (SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN)
§ 13-3553Sexual exploitation of a minor; evidence; classification; definitionIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. A person commits sexual exploitation of a minor by knowingly: 1. Recording, filming, photographing, developing or duplicating any visual depiction in which a minor is engaged in exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct. 2. Distributing, transporting, exhibiting, receiving, selling, purchasing, electronically transmitting, possessing or exchanging any visual depiction in which a minor is engaged in exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct. 3. Possessing, manufacturing, distributing, advertising, ordering, offering to sell, selling or purchasing a child sex doll that uses the face, image or likeness of a real infant or minor who is under twelve years of age with the intent to replicate the physical features of that real infant or minor. 4. Observing a nude minor for the purpose of engaging in sexual conduct for the person's sexual gratification. This paragraph does not apply to consensual conduct between minors who are at least fifteen, sixteen or seventeen years of age. B. If any visual depiction of sexual exploitation of a minor is admitted into evidence, the court shall seal that evidence at the conclusion of any grand jury proceeding, hearing or trial. C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 81 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Berger (Arizona Supreme Court 2006, 212 Ariz. 473)“…haracterized as a dangerous crime against children. A.R.S. § 13-3553(C). ¶3 Under this statutory…”
- State v. PAREDES-SOLANO (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2009, 223 Ariz. 284)“…[photographing’ and ‘developing 1 appear in A.R.S. § 13-3553(A)(1) while ‘transporting’ ánd ‘possess…”
- State v. Hazlett (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2003, 205 Ariz. 523)“…ndictments in each of the four appealed cases, finding that A.R.S. § 13-3553 is unconstitutionally overbroad because…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Arizona Pornography Laws (2026): AV Law & Penalties
§ 13-3554Luring a minor for sexual exploitation; classificationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. A person commits luring a minor for sexual exploitation by offering or soliciting sexual conduct with another person knowing or having reason to know that the other person is a minor. B. It is not a defense to a prosecution for a violation of this section that the other person is not a minor. C. Luring a minor for sexual exploitation is a class 3 felony, and if the minor is under fifteen years of age it is punishable pursuant to section 13-705. A person who is convicted of a violation of this section is not eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement on any basis except as specifically authorized by section 31-233, subsection A or B until the sentence imposed by the court has been served or commuted.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 27 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mejak v. Granville (Arizona Supreme Court 2006, 212 Ariz. 555)“…A grand jury indicted Mejak for violating A.R.S. § 13-3554. ¶4 Mejak filed a…”
- Boynton v. Anderson (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2003, 205 Ariz. 45)“…dismiss A.R.S. § 13-604.01 from the indictment arguing that A.R.S. § 13-3554 is not a “dangerous crime against child…”
- State v. Regenold (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2011, 227 Ariz. 224)“…police detective posing as a minor under age 15. We agree; AR.S. § 13-3554 does not trigger the more severe senten…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 13 (Criminal Code), Chapter 14 (SEXUAL OFFENSES)
§ 13-1425Unlawful disclosure of images depicting states of nudity or specific sexual activities; classification; definitionsIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
A. It is unlawful for a person to intentionally disclose an image of another person who is identifiable from the image itself or from information displayed in connection with the image if all of the following apply: 1. The person in the image is depicted in a state of nudity or is engaged in specific sexual activities. 2. The depicted person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Evidence that a person has sent an image to another person using an electronic device does not, on its own, remove the person's reasonable expectation of privacy for that image. Unless the realistic pictorial representation is created or modified by the depicted person, this paragraph does not apply to an image that is a realistic pictorial representation. 3. The image is disclosed with the intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten or coerce the depicted person. B. This section does not apply to any of the following: 1. The reporting of unlawful conduct. 2. Lawful and common practices of law enforcement, criminal reporting, legal proceedings or medical treatment. 3. Images involving voluntary exposure in a public or commercial setting. 4.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Arce v. Honeywell International Incorporated (District Court, D. Arizona 2024)“…f alleges Defendant’s filing of these photos violates A.R.S. § 13-1425, which prohibits the disclosure of imag…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Arizona Surreptitious Recording & Voyeurism Laws: ARS 13-3019 Penalties (2026), Arizona Extortion Laws: Theft by Extortion, Sextortion and Penalties
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 6 (SPECIAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS BY INDIVIDUAL PERSONS), Article 7 (Torts of Minors)
§ 12-661Liabilities of parents or legal guardians for malicious or wilful misconduct of minorsIn force
A. Any act of malicious or wilful misconduct of a minor which results in any injury to the person or property of another, to include theft or shoplifting, shall be imputed to the parents or legal guardian having custody or control of the minor whether or not such parents or guardian could have anticipated the misconduct for all purposes of civil damages, and such parents or guardian having custody or control shall be jointly and severally liable with such minor for any actual damages resulting from such malicious or wilful misconduct. B. The joint and several liability of one or both parents or legal guardian having custody or control of a minor under this section shall not exceed ten thousand dollars for each tort of the minor. The liability imposed by this section is in addition to any liability otherwise imposed by law. C. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, nothing in this section limits the right of an insurer to exclude coverage for the acts of a minor imputed to his parent or legal guardian pursuant to this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Blocher v. Thompson (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1991, 169 Ariz. 182)“…the family purpose doctrine, (2) negligent entrustment, (3) A.R.S. § 12-661, and (4) A.R.S. § 28-417(C). On…”
- Wyatt v. Wehmueller (Arizona Supreme Court 1991, 167 Ariz. 281)“…bility it easily could have done so expressly. See, e.g., A.R.S. § 12-661(A) ("Any act of malicious or wilful mis…”
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. White (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2003, 204 Ariz. 500)“…that this negligence should be imputed to the Wildes under A.R.S. § 12-661 (Supp.2002), and that the Wildes neglig…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 13 (Criminal Code), Chapter 35 (OBSCENITY)
§ 13-3501DefinitionsIn force
In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. "Harmful to minors" means that quality of any description or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual activity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse, when both: (a) To the average adult applying contemporary state standards with respect to what is suitable for minors, it both: (i) Appeals to the prurient interest, when taken as a whole. In order for an item as a whole to be found or intended to have an appeal to the prurient interest, it is not necessary that the item be successful in arousing or exciting any particular form of prurient interest either in the hypothetical average person, in a member of its intended and probable recipient group or in the trier of fact. (ii) Portrays the description or representation in a patently offensive way. (b) Taken as a whole does not have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. 2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Limpus (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1981, 128 Ariz. 371)“…as defined in § 13-3501. The definitional section of A.R.S. § 13-3501 with which we are concerned here is A.R…”
- State v. Hummer (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1995, 184 Ariz. 603)“…standards with respect to what is suitable for minors____” A.R.S. § 13-3501(l)(a). Expert testimony is appropriate…”
- State v. Kamin (Arizona Supreme Court 1986, 151 Ariz. 70)“…any obscene item, or offers to do any such things. Under A.R.S. § 13-3501(2), an item is obscene when (a) The a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 13 (Criminal Code), Chapter 7 (SENTENCING AND IMPRISONMENT)
§ 13-705Dangerous crimes against children; sentences; definitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. A person who is at least eighteen years of age and who is convicted of a dangerous crime against children in the first degree involving commercial sexual exploitation of a minor or child sex trafficking and the person has previously been convicted of a dangerous crime against children in the first degree shall be sentenced to imprisonment in the custody of the state department of corrections for natural life. A person who is sentenced to natural life is not eligible for commutation, parole, work furlough, work release or release from confinement on any basis for the remainder of the person's natural life. B. A person who is at least eighteen years of age and who is convicted of a dangerous crime against children in the first degree involving sexual assault of a minor who is twelve years of age or younger or sexual conduct with a minor who is twelve years of age or younger shall be sentenced to life imprisonment and is not eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement on any basis except as specifically authorized by section 31-233, subsection A or B until the person has served thirty-five years or the sentence is commuted.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 145 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Felix (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2015, 237 Ariz. 280)“…r the age of fifteen is a dangerous crime against children. A.R.S. § 13-705(P)(1)(b). A defendant need not know the…”
- State v. Jones (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2013, 232 Ariz. 448)“…and the Count 2 child abuse conviction, in accordance with A.R.S. § 13-705(M), because the child abuse conviction…”
- State v. Rix (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2023, 104 Arizona Cases Digest 4)“…f which constituted dangerous crimes against children under A.R.S. § 13-705. See…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Age of Consent Laws: Statutes, Penalties and Reporting, Arizona Assault Laws: Simple vs Aggravated Assault and Penalties
§ 13-707Misdemeanors; sentencingIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
A. A sentence of imprisonment for a misdemeanor shall be for a definite term to be served other than a place within custody of the state department of corrections. The court shall fix the term of imprisonment within the following maximum limitations: 1. For a class 1 misdemeanor, six months. 2. For a class 2 misdemeanor, four months. 3. For a class 3 misdemeanor, thirty days. B. A person who is at least eighteen years of age or who has been tried as an adult and who stands convicted of any misdemeanor or petty offense, other than a traffic offense, and who has been convicted of one or more of the same misdemeanors or petty offenses within two years next preceding the date of the present offense shall be sentenced for the next higher class of offense than that for which the person currently is convicted. Time spent incarcerated within the two years next preceding the date of the offense for which a person is currently being sentenced shall not be included in the two years required to be free of convictions. C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 72 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. Dolny (Arizona Supreme Court 1989, 161 Ariz. 297)“…ed of misdemeanor possession of marijuana in Arizona. See A.R.S. §§ 13-707(A)(1), -802(A). In reaching its decis…”
- Benitez v. Dunevant (Arizona Supreme Court 2000, 198 Ariz. 90)“…mum sentence available was six months' incarceration, see A.R.S. § 13-707(A)(1) (1989), and a fine of $2500, see…”
- State v. Ceasar (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2016, 241 Ariz. 66)“…should be remanded for resentencing. We agree. ¶ 5 Under A.R.S. § 13-707(B), an enhanced sentence may be imposed…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Disorderly Conduct and Criminal Trespass Laws (2026), Arizona Felony Classes and Misdemeanor Penalties (2026), Arizona Open Container Law (2026): Possession and Drinking Both Banned
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 8 (Child Safety), Chapter 3 (JUVENILE OFFENDERS), Article 3 (Disposition and Commitment)
§ 8-341Disposition and commitment; definitionsIn force
A. After receiving and considering the evidence on the proper disposition of the case, the court may enter judgment as follows: 1. It may award a delinquent juvenile: (a) To the care of the juvenile's parents, subject to the supervision of a probation department. (b) To a probation department, subject to any conditions the court may impose, including a period of incarceration in a juvenile detention center of not more than one year. (c) To a reputable citizen of good moral character, subject to the supervision of a probation department. (d) To a private agency or institution, subject to the supervision of a probation officer. (e) To the department of juvenile corrections. (f) To maternal or paternal relatives, subject to the supervision of a probation department. (g) To an appropriate official of a foreign country of which the juvenile is a foreign national who is unaccompanied by a parent or guardian in this state to remain on unsupervised probation for at least one year on the condition that the juvenile cooperate with that official. 2. It may award an incorrigible child: (a) To the care of the child's parents, subject to the supervision of a probation department.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 41 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Shane B. (Arizona Supreme Court 2000, 198 Ariz. 85)“…a “first time felony juvenile offender” warning pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-341, 1 a statute which took ef…”
- In Re Stephanie N. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2005, 210 Ariz. 317)“…ent that the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction is based on A.R.S. § 8-341(B) and the opinions in State v.…”
- In Re Kristen C. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1999, 193 Ariz. 562)“…ch the juvenile was adjudicated delinquent____ Under A.R.S. § 8-341(H), if the court finds that the earning…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- Arizona State Legislature(azleg.gov).gov
- State Bar of Arizona(azbar.org)
- Maricopa County Juvenile Probation(maricopa.gov).gov
- NetSmartz(missingkids.org)
- Cyber Civil Rights Initiative(cybercivilrights.org)
- Thorn(thorn.org)
- A.R.S. 8-309, Unlawful use of an electronic communication device by a minor; classification; definitions(azleg.gov)
- A.R.S. 8-341, Disposition and commitment; definitions(azleg.gov)
- A.R.S. 13-3553, Sexual exploitation of a minor; evidence; classification; definition(azleg.gov)
- A.R.S. 13-705, Dangerous crimes against children; sentences; definitions(azleg.gov)
- A.R.S. 13-1425, Unlawful disclosure of images depicting states of nudity or specific sexual activities; classification; definitions(azleg.gov)