Massachusetts
Massachusetts Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 11 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

If a collector is coming after you in Massachusetts, the sequence is the part most people get wrong. A private creditor has to sue you, win a judgment, and use trustee process, Massachusetts's name for garnishment, before any of your paycheck or bank account is legally at risk. The two beliefs that cause the most damage, that garnishment can start the moment you fall behind, and that an unanswered lawsuit just fades away, are both false. Most Massachusetts garnishments start from a default judgment entered because the person being sued never filed an answer, which makes responding to a summons the single highest-value move available.
Massachusetts also builds real consumer protection into its repossession law in a way most states do not, and its bank-account exemption is unusually simple: a fixed dollar amount that protects itself, without you having to ask.
Wage Garnishment in Massachusetts
Massachusetts protects wages through trustee process rather than a garnishment writ, and its formula, at G.L. c.246 Section 28, is more protective than most. A creditor may take no more than the amount left over after reserving the greater of 85 percent of your gross wages, or 50 times the greater of the federal or Massachusetts minimum hourly wage, for each week the wages were earned. The minimum wage that feeds the 50x multiplier is set by statute: G.L. c.151 Section 1 conclusively presumes a wage of less than $15.00 per hour to be oppressive and unreasonable, and the same section provides that the state minimum rate can in no case be less than $0.50 above the effective federal minimum rate. At $15.00 an hour, 50 times the minimum wage is $750 per week, so a creditor may reach only what remains after reserving the greater of $750 or 85 percent of your gross wages for that week.
Section 28 carries a second exemption in the same section that garnishment guides routinely skip past: amounts held by a trustee for a defendant in a pension are also reserved in the trustee's hands and exempt from attachment. The statute defines pension broadly, covering any annuity, pension, profit sharing, or other retirement plan subject to ERISA, a Keogh plan maintained by a self-employed individual, a section 401(a) plan not subject to ERISA, a Simplified Employee Plan, a section 403(b) annuity plan, and an Individual Retirement Account or Annuity. One carve-out limits it: deposits made during the 5-year period before the individual's declaration of bankruptcy or entry of judgment, to the extent they exceed 7 percent of that individual's total income for the period, do not get the protection.
If a creditor attaches wages the formula protects, G.L. c.246 Section 30 makes it an offense to wilfully cause, or aid and abet in causing, exempt wages to be attached by trustee process in order to unlawfully hinder or delay their payment to the person they belong to. It runs on the complaint of the injured person, but be realistic about its size: the penalty is a fine of not more than $50, paid to the person injured. Treat it as a supplement to moving in court to dissolve or reduce an over-reaching attachment, not a substitute for doing so.
There is no separate head-of-household or family-size wage exemption in Massachusetts; the 85 percent and 50x formula applies uniformly. One notable carve-out runs the other direction: the ordinary wage-attachment protection in Section 28 does not apply to a proceeding to attach wages for a divorce, separate maintenance, or child support order. Those cases instead follow the federal support-garnishment percentage limits, which allow a creditor to take up to 50 to 65 percent of disposable earnings depending on your circumstances. Support orders run on that federal scale, and our wage garnishment calculator can estimate those percentages for your own pay period.
No Massachusetts statute was found extending job protection beyond the federal floor. Under 15 U.S.C. Section 1674, an employer cannot discharge an employee over a garnishment for any one debt, punishable by up to $1,000 or a year in prison, but that federal protection stops at the first debt; a second, unrelated garnishment carries no federal firing protection, and no additional Massachusetts statute was confirmed to extend it further.
State tax debt runs on a different track. The Department of Revenue does not need a judgment or trustee process at all: G.L. c.62C Section 53 lets the Commissioner collect an unpaid tax by levy on all property and rights to property belonging to the taxpayer, and a levy on salary or wages is continuous from the date it is first made until the liability is satisfied or becomes unenforceable by lapse of time. Because that is an administrative levy rather than a court attachment, the 85 percent and 50x formula in c.246 Section 28 does not govern it. If DOR levies your pay, take it up with the Department directly through a release or payment agreement, or with a tax professional, rather than assuming a garnishment percentage caps what it can take.
Bank Account Protections
Massachusetts's signature bank protection is simple and automatic. Under G.L. c.246 Section 28A, $2,500 of a natural person's funds in a trust company, savings bank, cooperative bank, credit union, or national bank operating in Massachusetts is exempt from trustee-process attachment, and the exemption is self-executing: the bank, acting as trustee, must answer as subject to attachment only the amount above $2,500, without the debtor asserting anything first. Business, trust, and organizational accounts do not get this exemption, and no individual gets more than $2,500 protected at any one time across accounts. A separate, overlapping protection exists in the general execution-exemptions statute, G.L. c.235 Section 34, which lists its own $2,500 exemption for cash, savings, and deposits alongside a $1,000 general wildcard, plus up to $5,000 of unused dollar amounts. That $5,000 stacking is narrower than it sounds: clause Seventeenth allows it only out of the unused aggregate exemptions under clauses Second, Fifth and Sixteenth, not out of unused exemption amounts generally.

Federal law layers on top of these. Under 31 CFR Part 212, a bank that receives a garnishment order must review the account and protect an amount equal to the last two months of directly deposited Social Security, VA, and certain other federal benefit payments, automatically, without the account holder needing to claim an exemption. That protection covers direct deposit only, not benefits deposited later by paper check.
Statute of Limitations on Debt in Massachusetts
Massachusetts sets a 6-year limitations period for ordinary contract actions, both express and implied, under G.L. c.260 Section 2. That single period covers written contracts, oral obligations, open accounts, and, by elimination, credit card debt, since a credit card agreement is not executed under seal. A longer 20-year period is reserved under G.L. c.260 Section 1 for contracts under seal and for promissory notes signed in the presence of an attesting witness, but only when the action is brought by the original payee or their estate.
Promissory notes follow the same split pattern. An ordinary negotiable note payable at a definite time gets 6 years from the due date, or from an accelerated due date, under Massachusetts's UCC Article 3 (G.L. c.106 Section 3-118); a demand note gets 6 years from demand, or is barred after 10 years of no payment with no demand made. A witnessed note held by the original payee instead falls under the 20-year period.
Massachusetts's revival rule is genuinely more nuanced than a simple writing-only or payment-only rule. Under G.L. c.260 Section 13, an oral acknowledgment or promise is not enough on its own to take a claim out of the limitations bar; it must be contained in a writing signed by the person being charged. But under Section 14, an actual payment of principal or interest is not stripped of its ordinary legal effect by that writing requirement, so a genuine part payment can restart the clock. There is a catch: a written endorsement or memorandum of that payment made by or on behalf of the creditor is not, by itself, sufficient proof that the payment happened. In practice, a real payment can revive Massachusetts's 6-year clock, but proving it requires more than the collector's own account records, and a bare unwritten promise with no payment cannot restart the clock at all without a signed writing.
Two points hold true regardless of how a specific debt is classified. Time-barred debt is not erased debt: a collector can still ask you to pay, and it can remain on your credit report for up to 7 years under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a separate clock entirely. And suing or threatening to sue on a debt after the statute of limitations has run is a flat violation of federal Regulation F (12 CFR 1006.26).
What Debt Collectors Can and Cannot Do
Third-party collectors working Massachusetts accounts answer to the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Regulation F. They cannot call before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. your local time, harass you, misrepresent the amount or legal status of a debt, or threaten to sue on a debt that is already time-barred. Within five days of first contacting you, a collector must send validation information, and once you dispute a debt in writing, the collector must stop reporting it as valid until it verifies the debt. Massachusetts adds its own layer, and the statute matters more than the regulation usually cited alongside it. G.L. c.93 Section 49 bars a creditor, a creditor's attorney, or an assignee of a creditor from collecting a consumer debt in an unfair, deceptive or unreasonable manner, and it spells out what that covers: disclosing the debt to third parties without the debtor's written permission, apart from credit bureau reporting or engaging an attorney; continuing to contact the debtor after an attorney representing them has asked that communications go through counsel; communicating in a harassing or embarrassing way, including at unreasonable hours or frequency, with threats of violence, offensive language, or threats of action the collector does not take; and using forms that simulate judicial process. Note who that reaches: Section 49 binds the original creditor too, not only the third-party collectors the FDCPA targets.
The consequence is what gives the section teeth. Failure to comply with Section 49 is itself an unfair or deceptive act or practice under chapter 93A, which carries a private consumer remedy under G.L. c.93A Section 9: actual damages or $25, whichever is greater, up to three but not less than two times actual damages for a willful or knowing violation or a bad faith refusal to settle, plus reasonable attorney's fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff. That route requires a written demand for relief mailed to the prospective defendant at least 30 days before filing suit. The same chapter 93A demand letter and damages rules apply when a business misleads or defrauds you outside of debt collection, which our guide to Massachusetts scam and fraud laws walks through along with where to file a complaint with the Attorney General. On top of the statute, the Attorney General's debt collection regulation at 940 CMR 7.00 adds state-specific limits on contact frequency and required disclosures.
Car Repossession in Massachusetts
Massachusetts enacted the standard UCC self-help rule at G.L. c.106 Article 9 Section 9-609: a secured party may take possession through judicial process, or without judicial process if it proceeds without a breach of the peace. But Massachusetts layers a significantly more protective structure on top of that baseline for consumer transactions.

Under G.L. c.255 Section 13J, self-help repossession without a prior court hearing is allowed only in a narrow lane: the default has to be material, meaning a missed payment or an event that substantially impairs the collateral's value, and the creditor has to be able to take possession without force, without a breach of the peace, and, absent the debtor's consent, without entering property the debtor owns or rents. Outside that lane, a creditor under a consumer credit transaction may proceed against the collateral only after a prior hearing, with the debtor given 7 or more days' written notice of the hearing date. That is a real, structural check most states do not impose.
Two overlapping cure-and-redemption regimes apply to different collateral, and their timelines are not the same number restated. General consumer collateral falls under G.L. c.255 Section 13I: the creditor sends a notice of default 10 or more days after the default, and the debtor then has 21 days from when the notice is mailed to cure by paying all unpaid sums due, without acceleration, provided the creditor has not already accelerated, sued, or repossessed. If the collateral is repossessed anyway, the debtor gets a separate 20-day window after repossession to redeem by paying the full debt plus reasonable expenses. Motor vehicles under a retail installment contract instead fall under G.L. c.255B Section 20A, which uses the same 10-day notice trigger and a parallel but separately numbered 21-day pre-repossession cure window and 20-day post-repossession redemption window. Do not collapse the two regimes' day counts into a single figure; c.255 Section 13I and c.255B Section 20A set their own deadlines under separate statutes, and which one governs depends on the collateral.
Massachusetts also caps deficiency exposure on small transactions. Under G.L. c.255 Section 13J, for a consumer credit transaction with an unpaid balance of $2,000 or less, secured by a non-possessory interest in consumer goods, a debtor who has the collateral repossessed or voluntarily surrenders it owes no deficiency at all. Above that threshold, the general UCC Article 9 disposition and deficiency rules apply unless displaced by Sections 13I or 13J. A narrow, unrelated overlay exists for hospital equipment: when the debtor is a licensed hospital and the collateral is a medical device, the secured party must give both the hospital and the Department of Public Health 60 days' written notice before taking possession, a rule with no bearing on ordinary consumer repossession.
Servicemembers get one further protection: for a vehicle financed before military service, the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3952) requires a court order before repossession.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Massachusetts
Move in this order. First, if you are served with a lawsuit, file an answer before the deadline, even a bare general denial, because a default judgment forfeits every defense you had, including the statute of limitations. Second, if trustee process is already running against your wages or bank account, check the math against the 85 percent and 50x-minimum-wage formula, and remember that $2,500 in a bank account is automatically protected before a creditor can reach it. Third, if the debt is old, raise the statute of limitations yourself; the court will not raise it for you, and be cautious about making any payment on it. Finally, if a secured loan is behind, use the hearing right or cure window described above before a creditor can lawfully take the collateral, and if the overall debt picture is unmanageable, bankruptcy's automatic stay stops most trustee process and collection lawsuits while the case is pending.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Car Repossession Laws
- Can Social Security Be Garnished?
- Massachusetts Statute of Limitations
- Massachusetts Bankruptcy
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Massachusetts Laws
- Massachusetts Final Paycheck Laws
- Massachusetts Statute of Limitations
- Massachusetts Unclaimed Property
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of my paycheck can be garnished in Massachusetts?
A creditor can take only what is left after reserving the greater of 85 percent of your gross wages or 50 times the higher of the federal or Massachusetts minimum wage, for each week, under G.L. c.246 Section 28.
Is money in my bank account safe from a Massachusetts judgment?
The first $2,500 of a natural person's funds in a bank, savings, or credit union account is automatically exempt from trustee-process attachment under G.L. c.246 Section 28A, and the bank must protect that amount without you having to claim it.
What is the statute of limitations on credit card debt in Massachusetts?
Six years under G.L. c.260 Section 2, the same period that applies to ordinary written and oral contracts, since a credit card agreement is not executed under seal.
Does making a payment restart the clock on old debt in Massachusetts?
It can. A genuine payment of principal or interest keeps its traditional restarting effect under G.L. c.260 Section 14, but the payment has to be proven with evidence beyond the creditor's own records. A bare oral promise with no payment cannot restart the clock without a signed writing, under Section 13.
Can a lender repossess my car without a court hearing in Massachusetts?
Only in a narrow lane: the default has to be a missed payment or an event that impairs the collateral's value, and the lender has to be able to take it without force, breach of the peace, or entering your property without consent. Outside that lane, Massachusetts law requires a court hearing with at least 7 days' notice before a consumer credit collateral can be repossessed, under G.L. c.255 Section 13J.
Can I owe money after my car is repossessed in Massachusetts?
Not if the unpaid balance was $2,000 or less at the time of repossession; Massachusetts bars any deficiency judgment on transactions that small under G.L. c.255 Section 13J. Above that threshold, the general UCC rules on commercially reasonable disposition apply.
Updates
Added Massachusetts's own debt collection statute, G.L. c.93 Section 49, and the chapter 93A damages it triggers; replaced two unresolved research notes with the primary sources that settle them (the $15.00 minimum wage behind the 50x garnishment multiplier and the Department of Revenue's levy authority); added the pension exemption and the penalty for attaching exempt wages from the garnishment statute; and corrected the scope of the $5,000 wildcard stacking.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 93
§ 49Debt collection in an unfair, deceptive or unreasonable mannerIn force
Section 49. No one who is a creditor or an attorney for a creditor, or an assignee of a creditor, of a natural person present or residing in Massachusetts who has incurred a debt primarily for personal, family or household purposes shall collect or attempt to collect such debt in an unfair, deceptive or unreasonable manner. For the purposes of this section, such collection or attempt to collect shall be deemed unfair, deceptive or unreasonable if: (a) The creditor communicates, threatens to communicate, or implies the fact of such debt or alleged debt to a person other than the person who might reasonably be expected to be liable therefor, or to an authorized user after the fact if that status is communicated to the creditor in writing, except with the written permission of the alleged debtor. The provisions of this paragraph shall not prohibit a creditor from notifying a debtor of the fact that the creditor may report a debt or alleged debt to a credit bureau or engage an agent or an attorney for the purpose of collecting the debt or alleged debt.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 246
§ 28Wages and pensions; exemptions; exceptionsIn force
Section 28. If wages for personal labor or personal services of a defendant are attached for a debt or claim, an amount not exceeding the greater of 85 per cent of the debtor's gross wages or 50 times the greater of the federal or the Massachusetts hourly minimum wage for each week or portion thereof out of the wages then due to the defendant for labor performed or services rendered during each week for which such wages were earned but not paid shall be reserved in the hands of the trustee and shall be exempt from such attachment. Except as otherwise permitted by law, amounts held by a trustee for a defendant in a pension shall be reserved in the hands of the trustee and shall be exempt from attachment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kennedy v. Kennedy (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1980, 10 Mass. App. Ct. 113)“…76), subject to the amounts made exempt by the operation of G. L. c. 246, § 28. 3 The Massachuset…”
- Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Gilman (Massachusetts Superior Court 1993, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 2)“…al investment accounts, be dissolved. It appears that under G.L.c. 246, §28 as amended through st. 1992, c.153, §31…”
- Fox & Abrams, P.C. v. Fraioli (Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division 1984, 1984 Mass. App. Div. 64)“…mitations, including those imposed by federal law. See *66 G.L.c. 246, § 28; Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P. Rule 4.2;…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 28AMonies held by banks or similar institutions; exemption; limitationsIn force
Section 28A. Twenty-five hundred dollars of any natural person in an account in a trust company, savings bank, cooperative bank, credit union, national banking association or other banking institution doing business in the commonwealth shall be exempt from attachment by trustee process. A trustee summons served on any such institution shall describe the exemption with reference to this section. Upon service of a trustee summons, the trustee shall answer as subject to attachment only so much money of the defendant that exceeds $2,500. No business, trust or organization shall be entitled to the exemption in this section and no natural person shall be entitled to more than a $2,500 exemption at any one time. In any action, the plaintiff may apply to the court for further attachments upon proof by certified records of a trustee that the defendant has received an exemption not authorized under this section or that the $2,500 exemption of the defendant has been in whole or in part exhausted or exceeded.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bakwin v. Mardirosian (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2014, 467 Mass. 631)“…ed as if each account holder owned one-half of the account. G. L. c. 246, § 28A, as amended by St. 1975, c. 377, § 133.…”
- Astuccio v. R.K. Ahern Co. (Massachusetts Superior Court 1998, 9 Mass. L. Rptr. 97)“…hip presumption and $500.00 one time exclusion set forth in G.L.c. 246, §28A, the Trustee Bank cannot account for th…”
- In re Sutherland (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts 2013, 495 B.R. 134)“…Relying upon Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 235, § 34 (fífteenth) and Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 246, § 28A, Mr. Sutherland claimed as exempt a tot…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 260
§ 2Contract actions; actions upon judgments or decrees of courts of recordIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Section 2. Actions of contract, other than those to recover for personal injuries, founded upon contracts or liabilities, express or implied, except actions limited by section one or actions upon judgments or decrees of courts of record of the United States or of this or of any other state of the United States, shall, except as otherwise provided, be commenced only within six years next after the cause of action accrues.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 308 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Siebe, Inc. v. Louis M. Gerson Co. (Massachusetts Appeals Court 2009, 74 Mass. App. Ct. 544)“…oviding for a six-year limitations period, applies. 25 See G. L. c. 260, § 2. See also John Beaudette, Inc. v. Se…”
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. Crandall Dry Dock Engineers, Inc. (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1986, 396 Mass. 818)“…urther argues that the applicable statute of limitations is G. L. c. 260, § 2, 7 which allows contract a…”
- Carpenter v. Pomerantz (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1994, 36 Mass. App. Ct. 627)“…been made within the six-year limitation period set out in G. L. c. 260, § 2 2 The Superior Court judge…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Massachusetts Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 1Actions requiring commencement within twenty yearsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Section 1. The following actions shall be commenced only within twenty years next after the cause of action accrues: First, Actions upon contracts under seal. Second, Actions upon bills, notes or other evidences of indebtedness issued by a bank. Third, Actions upon promissory notes signed in the presence of an attesting witness, if brought by the original payee or by his executor or administrator. Fourth, Actions upon contracts not limited by the following section or by any other law. Fifth, Actions under section thirty-two of chapter one hundred and twenty-three to recover for the support of inmates in state institutions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 50 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Premier Capital, LLC v. KMZ, Inc. (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2013, 464 Mass. 467)“…e of limitations governing actions on contracts under seal, G. L. c. 260, § 1. Therefore, KMZ’s motion for summary ju…”
- Solomon v. Birger (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1985, 19 Mass. App. Ct. 634)“…instrument, and, as such, the claim is not time-barred. See G. L. c. 260, § 1. The buyers’ claim would be barred only…”
- Kingston Housing Authority v. Sandonato & Bogue, Inc. (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1991, 31 Mass. App. Ct. 270)“…rued because its contract with Sandonato is under seal. See G. L. c. 260, § 1, First. After hearing the case o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 13Acknowledgment or new promise; effectIn force
Section 13. No acknowledgment or promise shall be evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take an action of contract out of the operation of this chapter or to deprive a party of the benefit thereof, unless such acknowledgment or promise has been made by, or is contained in, a writing signed by the party chargeable thereby.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2013
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Equi v. Licari (Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division 1985, 1985 Mass. App. Div. 181)“…knowledgment of the defendants’ continuing debt. Pursant to G.L.c. 260, §13, evidence must be advanced of an acknow…”
- Epstein v. Seigel (Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division 1985, 1985 Mass. App. Div. 113)“…ted a revival of the defendant’s debt within the purview of G.L. c. 260, § 13. 2 It is elementary lawthat in order…”
- Westminster National Bank v. Graustein (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1930, 270 Mass. 565)“…s $7,500. In order to bring a case within the provisions of G. L. c. 260, § 13, “there must be either an express promi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 14Part payment; effectIn force
Section 14. The preceding section shall not alter or impair the effect of a payment of principal or interest made by any person; but no endorsement or memorandum of any such payment, written or made upon a promissory note, bill of exchange or other writing by or on behalf of the party to whom such payment has been or purports to have been made, shall be sufficient proof of the payment to take the case out of the provisions of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1980
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McCarthy v. Simon (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1924, 247 Mass. 514)“…e of them were made by or in the presence of the defendant. G. L. c. 260, § 14. The testimony of the defendant might…”
- Young v. Reed (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1978, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 18)“…issible as bearing on the significance of part payment; see G. L. c. 260, § 14). Since the judgment must be rev…”
- Arlington Trust Co. v. Pappalardo (Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division 1980, 1980 Mass. App. Div. 51)“…ffs cause of action against Flamingo Bay, Inc. by virtue of G. L. c. 260, § 14. McDonald v. Hanahan, 328 Mass. 5…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 255
§ 13JRepossession of collateral under a consumer credit transaction; hearing; redemption; disposition; deficiency; insurance proceeds; determination of valueIn force
Section 13J. (a) Subject to the provisions of this section a secured creditor under a consumer credit transaction may take possession of collateral. In taking possession the secured creditor under a consumer credit transaction may proceed without a prior hearing only if the default is material and consists of the debtor's failure to make one or more payments as required by the agreement or the occurrence of an event which substantially impairs the value of the collateral, and only if possession can be obtained without use of force, without a breach of peace and, unless the debtor consents to an entry, at the time of such entry, without entry upon property owned by, or rented to the debtor. (b) Except as provided in subsection (a), a creditor under a consumer credit transaction may proceed against collateral only after a prior hearing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
§ 13IDefault under consumer credit transactions; enforcement; notice; curing of default; deficiency judgmentIn force
Section 13I. (a) In any consumer credit transaction involving a loan that is secured by a non-possessory security interest in consumer goods a provision relating to default is enforceable only to the extent that the default is material and consists of the debtor's failure to make one or more payments as required by the agreement, or the occurrence of an event which substantially impairs the value of the collateral. (b) After a default under a consumer credit transaction by a debtor the secured creditor may not bring an action against the debtor or proceed against the collateral until he gives the debtor the notice required by this section. Said notice shall be deemed to be delivered when delivered to the debtor or when mailed to the debtor at the debtor's address last known to the creditor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2018
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Williams v. American Honda Finance Corp. (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2018, 479 Mass. 656)“…t also the laws governing loans secured by consumer goods, G. L. c. 255, §§ 13I and 13J, and other retail instalment s…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 255B
§ 20ADefault; enforcement; notice; accelerated payment; curing of defaultIn force
Section 20A. (a) An agreement of the parties in a retail installment contract defining default is enforceable only to the extent that the default is material and consists of the buyer's failure to make one or more installments as required by the agreement; or the occurrence of an event which substantially impairs the value of the collateral. (b) After a default by a buyer under a consumer credit transaction, the secured creditor may not bring an action against the buyer or proceed against the collateral until he gives the buyer the notice described in this section. The notice so required shall be deemed to be delivered when delivered to the debtor or when mailed to the debtor at the debtor's address last known to the creditor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Williams v. American Honda Finance Corp. (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2018, 479 Mass. 656)“…The Legislature enacted the current provisions in G. L. c. 255B, §§ 20A and 20B, in 1973. St. 1973, c. 629.…”
- Lopes v. Fafama Auto Sales (Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division 2011, 2011 Mass. App. Div. 277)“…t also prevented Fafama from repossessing the vehicle under G.Lc. 255B, §§20A and 20B. l.The trial judge did not er…”
- U.S. Trust Co. v. Carreiro (Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division 2000, 2000 Mass. App. Div. 159)“…deficiency after repossession of an automobile pursuant to G.L.c. 255B, Sections 20A and B, and that the plaintiffs complain…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 235
§ 34Property exempt from executionIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Section 34. The following property of the debtor shall be exempt from seizure on execution: First, The necessary wearing apparel, beds and bedding for the debtor and the debtor's family, 1 heating unit used for warming the dwelling house, 1 stove, 1 refrigerator, 1 freezer and 1 hot water heater used primarily for the personal, family or household use of the debtor or a debtor's family and the amount each month, not exceeding $500, reasonably necessary to pay for fuel, heat, refrigeration, water, hot water and light for the debtor and the debtor's family; Second, Other household furniture necessary for the debtor and the debtor's family, not exceeding $15,000 in value; Third, The bibles, schoolbooks and library used by the debtor or the debtor's family, not exceeding $500 in value; Fourth, 2 cows, 12 sheep, 2 swine and 4 tons of hay; Fifth, Tools, implements and fixtures necessary for carrying on the trade or business of the debtor, not exceeding $5,000 in value; Sixth, Materials and stock designed and procured by the debtor which is necessary for carrying on the trade or business of the debtor and intended to be used or wrought therein, not exceeding…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- SLIVE & HANNA, INC. v. MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION & another. (Massachusetts Appeals Court 2021, 100 Mass. App. Ct. 432)“…ss earnings Page 440 are exempt from seizure. G. L. c. 235, § 34, First, Fifteenth. [Note 12] Household…”
- Jessamey v. Norfolk Financial Corp. (Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division 2006, 2006 Mass. App. Div. 82)“…liquidation proceeds.” Id. That construction of the G.L.c. 235, §34, Sixteenth term “value” as market value…”
- Koonce v. Aldo Realty Trust (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1979, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 199)“…ersonal property which were not exempt from execution under G. L. c. 235, § 34, as amended through St. 1975, c. 501, §…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Massachusetts (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Debt Collection Laws by State: Garnishment, SOL, and Repossession Rules, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Alaska Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
United States Code Title 50
§ 3952Protection under installment contracts for purchase or leaseIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
After a servicemember enters military service, a contract by the servicemember for— the purchase of real or personal property (including a motor vehicle); or the lease or bailment of such property, may not be rescinded or terminated for a breach of terms of the contract occurring before or during that person’s military service, nor may the property be repossessed for such breach without a court order. This section applies only to a contract for which a deposit or installment has been paid by the servicemember before the servicemember enters military service. A person who knowingly resumes possession of property in violation of subsection (a), or in violation of section 3918 of this title, or who knowingly attempts to do so, shall be fined as provided in title 18, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ditech Holding Corporation (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 2025)“…d on, or sold during or within a year after active service. 50 U.S.C. §§ 3952, 3953. Claimant states that he re…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Debt Collection Laws: The 10% Garnishment Cap, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Arkansas Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, California Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Sources and References
- G.L. c.246 Section 28, Exemption of Wages from Trustee Process(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.246 Section 28A, Exemption of Deposit Accounts from Trustee Process(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.235 Section 34, Property Exempt from Execution(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.260 Section 2, Actions on Contract(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.260 Section 1, Twenty-Year Limitation for Sealed Contracts and Witnessed Notes(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.260 Section 13, Acknowledgment Must Be in Writing(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.260 Section 14, Effect of Payment Preserved(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.255 Section 13J, Repossession Hearing Requirement and Deficiency Limits(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.255 Section 13I, Notice of Default and Right to Cure(malegislature.gov).gov
- G.L. c.255B Section 20A, Motor Vehicle Retail Installment Default(malegislature.gov).gov
- 12 CFR 1006.26, Collection of Time-Barred Debt (Regulation F)(ecfr.gov).gov
- G.L. c.93 Section 49, Debt Collection in an Unfair, Deceptive or Unreasonable Manner(malegislature.gov)
- G.L. c.93A Section 9, Consumer Action for Unfair or Deceptive Acts, Damages and Attorney Fees(malegislature.gov)
- G.L. c.151 Section 1, Minimum Wage Presumed Oppressive Below $15.00 Per Hour(malegislature.gov)
- G.L. c.246 Section 30, Penalty for Attaching Exempt Wages by Trustee Process(malegislature.gov)
- G.L. c.62C Section 53, Collection of Tax by Levy; Continuous Levy on Salary and Wages(malegislature.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.