Executive Order 14426: VA and Military Records Overhaul
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 17, 2026). · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

The Federal Register published Executive Order 14426, "Accelerating Access to Veterans' Benefits and Employment Opportunities," on September 11, 2026. The President signed the order on September 8, 2026. It directs the Department of War and the Department of Veterans Affairs to build permanent systems for sharing a service member's military and medical records and to speed up how veterans apply for benefits and find jobs after leaving active duty. It sets three deadlines, at 30, 120, and 180 days from the signing date, and it does not change the law that governs VA disability ratings or claims.
Verified against the official Federal Register text (FR Doc. 2026-18738, Vol. 91, No. 175, pages 58003 to 58005) on September 17, 2026.
Scope: This is a federal executive order. It directs the Department of War (the successor name for the agency long known as the Department of Defense, and the name the order itself uses throughout) and the Department of Veterans Affairs, in coordination with the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Office of Management and Budget. It governs how those federal agencies operate; it does not touch state law, and it does not itself change any individual veteran's disability rating, entitlement, or the outcome of a pending claim.
What the Order Actually Directs
Section 1 of the order states the problem it is meant to fix: "outdated and unwieldy records management and data systems and procedures hinder military personnel file and medical record sharing between the Department of War and the Department of Veterans Affairs," which the order says causes delays in "healthcare coverage, benefits processing and payment, education opportunities, and job training and placement" (Sec. 1).
Section 2 is the operative records directive. It orders the Secretary of War and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to, within 180 days, "establish updated information technology systems and policy guidance and memoranda" for the "permanent, prospective, and ongoing sharing of all Official Military Personnel Files and Service Treatment Records," running from the day a person enters military service until they no longer need VA benefits (Sec. 2(a)(i)). That directive is written to operate "consistent with" four existing statutes the order names directly, and they do different jobs. 38 U.S.C. 7332(e) is a confidentiality provision, protecting certain sensitive medical records. The Privacy Act at 5 U.S.C. 552a governs how federal agencies handle personal records generally. 38 U.S.C. 5103A is VA's duty to assist a claimant in developing a benefits claim. 38 U.S.C. 8111 authorizes the sharing of health care resources between VA and the military department.
The same 180 day clock also covers a second task: creating and deploying "digital tools using artificial intelligence and other emerging capabilities" so veterans can apply for benefits, including Department of Labor job training and opportunities, in a single place (Sec. 2(a)(ii)).
A separate, shorter clock applies to current troops. Within 30 days of the order, and "at all times thereafter," the Department of War must ensure that a currently serving member's personnel file, health records, and Service Treatment Records move to VA "immediately when a service member is discharged or released from the Armed Forces" (Sec. 2(a)(iii)). That is the one deadline in the order that has already started running toward a near-term date: 30 days from September 8, 2026 falls on October 8, 2026.
Section 2(b) adds a contracting requirement. Within 120 days, the Secretaries of War and Veterans Affairs, working with the Department of Health and Human Services (including its Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology) and the Office of Management and Budget (including the Federal Chief Information Officer and the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy), must review existing IT contracts and add interoperability requirements "to the extent consistent with law and Federal procurement policy," and must build that same requirement into every future contract for medical and personnel record systems.
Accelerating Employment Before and After Separation
Section 3 addresses the period around a service member's separation from active duty. Within 180 days, the Secretary of War, consulting with the Secretaries of Labor and Veterans Affairs, must update the Transition Assistance Program and related workforce programs authorized at 10 U.S.C. 1142, 1143, and 1144, and at 38 U.S.C. 4113. The goal, "to the maximum extent practicable and applicable," is that every separating service member is either connected to a specific open job tied to their skills and to goals set out in "America's Talent Strategy" or the Department of War's "Project Patriot Pipeline" before they separate, or enrolled, at their own discretion, in career and technical education, a Department of Labor funded program, or a registered apprenticeship for which they hold priority under 38 U.S.C. 4215 (Sec. 3(a)). The order also directs that separating members be connected with veterans' representatives from federal, state, or local government to help them apply for healthcare, disability, home loan, job placement, or education benefits (Sec. 3(b)).
What This Order Does Not Change
An executive order is a directive to executive branch agencies about how they run their own operations. It is not a statute, and it cannot rewrite one. Section 4(c) of this order says so in plain terms: "This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person" (Sec. 4(c)).
That clause matters for what it rules out. Nothing in Executive Order 14426 changes the disability rating criteria in 38 C.F.R. Part 4, the definition of service connection, the evidentiary standards VA uses to decide a claim, or the appeals process at the Board of Veterans' Appeals and the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Those remain governed by Title 38 of the U.S. Code and its implementing regulations, unchanged by this order. The order is also explicit that it does not touch the underlying legal authority of any agency: Section 4(a) says nothing in it may be read to "impair or otherwise affect" the authority a department already has by law, or the Office of Management and Budget's role in budget and legislative matters. Section 4(b) adds that the whole order is implemented "consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations," meaning none of its deadlines override Congress's funding decisions.
Practically, that means a veteran with a claim in process today is not affected by this order's terms. The order describes new IT systems, new contract requirements, and a revised transition program, all built by the agencies themselves on the schedules above. If a deadline slips, Section 4(c) means there is no new cause of action created by this order for a veteran to point to. The order's stated remedy for processing delays is administrative and technical, not a change to entitlement law.
The Record Sharing Problem the Order Describes
The order frames the record sharing gap as a handoff problem between two departments rather than a gap in the law. Section 1 attributes delays in "healthcare coverage, benefits processing and payment, education opportunities, and job training and placement" to records systems, not to the substantive standards VA applies once it has a complete record. Section 2(a)(i) requires that the new sharing arrangement operate "consistent with" the four statutes the order names, including the Privacy Act at 5 U.S.C. 552a and the confidentiality protections at 38 U.S.C. 7332(e), alongside VA's duty-to-assist statute at 38 U.S.C. 5103A and the VA and military health-resource-sharing authority at 38 U.S.C. 8111. On the order's own terms, the existing legal limits on who may access a veteran's personnel and medical records are not being loosened by this directive. What changes is the technical mechanism for moving those records between the two departments.
Analysis: Why This Matters
The Recording Law Editorial Team notes that Executive Order 14426 is best read as an internal operations directive rather than a change to veterans' substantive rights. Its three deadlines target a specific, named bottleneck, the handoff of personnel and medical records between the Department of War and VA, and a second, related goal of connecting separating service members to jobs or training before they leave active duty. The order is unusually specific about its own limits: Section 4(c)'s no enforceable right clause, standard in executive orders generally, is paired here with an explicit statement that record sharing must remain "consistent with" the existing Privacy Act and Title 38 confidentiality statutes, and with a reminder in Section 4(b) that implementation depends on Congress funding it. Read together, those provisions place the order squarely in the category of a management directive to federal agencies about how they build systems and structure a transition program, not a rewrite of the law that decides whether, or how much, a given veteran is entitled to receive.
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. Veterans with questions about a specific claim, rating, or appeal should consult VA directly or a qualified veterans' benefits attorney or accredited representative.
Related Articles
- Learn how VA disability claims and ratings work at the state and federal level.
- If a rating decision seems wrong, see how to appeal a VA disability rating.
- Delays like the ones this order targets can affect VA disability back pay once a claim is finally approved.
- Veterans unable to work because of a service-connected condition may want to read about TDIU and individual unemployability.
- Faster, more automated claims processing is also a target for scammers; see our guide to spotting VA claim sharks.
Last updated: September 17, 2026. This article will be reviewed as the Department of War and VA report progress on the order's 30, 120, and 180 day deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Executive Order 14426 change how VA calculates a disability rating?
No. The order directs the Department of War and VA to share records faster and build new IT systems and a revised transition program. It does not amend Title 38 of the U.S. Code or 38 C.F.R., which set the rating criteria, evidentiary standards, and claims process VA uses.
What happens if the Department of War or VA misses one of the deadlines in the order?
The order does not create a legal right a veteran or anyone else can enforce against the United States if a deadline is missed. Section 4(c) states explicitly that the order does not create any right or benefit enforceable at law or in equity against the government, its agencies, or its employees.
When do the order's deadlines fall?
All three deadlines run from the September 8, 2026 signing date. The 30 day deadline for immediate record transfer at discharge falls on October 8, 2026. The 120 day deadline for the interagency IT contract review falls in early January 2027. The 180 day deadlines for the permanent record sharing systems, the AI based application tools, and the updated Transition Assistance Program fall in early March 2027.
Does the order apply to state veterans agencies or state benefits?
No. It is a federal executive order directing the Department of War, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Office of Management and Budget. It does not direct state governments and does not alter state veterans benefits programs.
What is the Transition Assistance Program the order updates?
It is the existing program, authorized at 10 U.S.C. 1142, 1143, and 1144, that prepares service members for civilian life before they separate from active duty. Section 3 of the order directs the Department of War, working with the Departments of Labor and Veterans Affairs, to update it within 180 days so more separating members leave with a specific job lined up or are enrolled in training or an apprenticeship.
Does the order affect the confidentiality of a veteran's medical or personnel records?
The order requires the new record sharing systems to operate consistent with the Privacy Act at 5 U.S.C. 552a and with 38 U.S.C. 7332(e), which protects certain sensitive medical records. It directs faster and more complete sharing between the Department of War and VA, not a change to who else may access those records.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
United States Code Title 10
§ 1142Preseparation counseling; transmittal of certain records to Department of Veterans AffairsIn force
Within the time periods specified in paragraph (3), the Secretary concerned shall (except as provided in paragraph (4)) provide for individual preseparation counseling of each member of the armed forces whose discharge (regardless of character of discharge) or release from active duty is anticipated as of a specific date. A notation of the provision of such counseling with respect to each matter specified in subsection (b), signed by the member, shall be placed in the service record of each member receiving such counseling. In carrying out this section, the Secretary concerned shall use the services available under section 1144 of this title. Preseparation counseling may be provided in person to the extent practicable. If the Secretary concerned determines that it is infeasible for a member to attend such counseling in person, such member may receive such counseling remotely, with online access to modules and reading materials. In the case of an anticipated retirement, preseparation counseling shall commence as soon as possible during the 24-month period preceding the anticipated retirement date.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Van Cleave v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2006, 70 Fed. Cl. 674)“…cretary to assist Mr. Van Cleave as required by law. See 10 U.S.C. § 1142 (a) (“[T]he Secretary [of the Navy] ...…”
- Sobczak v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2010, 93 Fed. Cl. 625)“…soon as possible within the remaining period of service. 10 U.S.C. § 1142 (a)(3)(A)-(B) (2006). At the conclusi…”
- Marshall v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2023)“…examination and pre- separation counseling as required by 10 U.S.C. §§ 1142 and 1145. Id. ¶¶ 1, 3, 93–98. He furthe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 38
§ 4113Transition Assistance Program personnelIn force
In accordance with section 1144 of title 10, the Secretary shall enter into a contract with an appropriate private entity or entities to provide the functions described in subsection (b) at all locations where the program described in such section is carried out. Contractors under subsection (a) shall provide to members of the Armed Forces who are being separated from active duty (and the spouses of such members) the services described in section 1144(a)(1) of title 10, including the following: Counseling. Assistance in identifying employment and training opportunities and help in obtaining such employment and training. Assessment of academic preparation for enrollment in an institution of higher learning or occupational training. Other related information and services under such section. Such other services as the Secretary considers appropriate.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Colorado Nurses Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1988, 851 F.2d 1486)“…ees are appointed ( 38 U.S.C. §§ 4101 and 4106), trained ( 38 U.S.C. § 4113 ), paid ( 38 U.S.C. § 4107 ), and disci…”
- Colorado Nurses Association v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Ft. Lyons, Colorado v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Colorado Nurses Association, Intervenor (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1988, 851 F.2d 1486)“…are appointed ( 38 U.S.C. Secs. 4101 and 4106), trained ( 38 U.S.C. Sec. 4113 ), paid ( 38 U.S.C. Sec. 4107 ), and di…”
- Inverness Technologies, Inc. v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2019)“…ce, and other transitional services: Department of Labor”); 38 U.S.C. § 4113 (2012) (titled “Transition Assistance P…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 4215Priority of service for veterans in Department of Labor job training programsIn force
In this section: The term “covered person” means any of the following individuals: A veteran. The spouse of any of the following individuals: Any veteran who died of a service-connected disability. Any member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who, at the time of application for assistance under this section, is listed, pursuant to section 556 of title 37 and regulations issued thereunder, by the Secretary concerned in one or more of the following categories and has been so listed for a total of more than 90 days: (I) missing in action, (II) captured in line of duty by a hostile force, or (III) forcibly detained or interned in line of duty by a foreign government or power. Any veteran who has a total disability resulting from a service-connected disability. Any veteran who died while a disability so evaluated was in existence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Nasatka v. Delaware Technical Community College (District Court, D. Delaware 2021)“…Plaintiff alleges violations of the Jobs for Veterans Act, 38 U.S.C. § 4215, and the Workforce Innovation and Opp…”
- Sean Donahue v. United States Department of La (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2021)“…ould not be affirmed. Rather, relying almost exclusively on 38 U.S.C. § 4215, Donahue argues only that, as a veteran…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5103ADuty to assist claimantsIn force
The Secretary shall make reasonable efforts to assist a claimant in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate the claimant’s claim for a benefit under a law administered by the Secretary. The Secretary is not required to provide assistance to a claimant under this section if no reasonable possibility exists that such assistance would aid in substantiating the claim. The Secretary may defer providing assistance under this section pending the submission by the claimant of essential information missing from the claimant’s application. As part of the assistance provided under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make reasonable efforts to obtain relevant private records that the claimant adequately identifies to the Secretary. Whenever the Secretary, after making such reasonable efforts, is unable to obtain all of the relevant records sought, the Secretary shall notify the claimant that the Secretary is unable to obtain records with respect to the claim.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,348 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- James P. Barr v. R. James Nicholson (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2007, 21 Vet. App. 303)“…failed to discuss adequately evidence in support of claim); 38 U.S.C. § 5103A(d)(2) (Secretary must take into conside…”
- Dingess - Hartman v. Nicholson (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2006, 19 Vet. App. 473)“…The VCAA also requires the Secretary to assist claimants. 38 U.S.C. § 5103A. Section 5103A(a)(1) states that "the Se…”
- Larry A. Pelegrini v. Anthony J. Principi (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2004, 18 Vet. App. 112)“…sions of the VCAA (as codified at 38 U.S.C. § 5103 (a) and 38 U.S.C. § 5103A, respectively), quoted the “Rule With R…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 7332Confidentiality of certain medical recordsIn force
Records of the identity, diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment of any patient or subject which are maintained in connection with the performance of any program or activity (including education, training, treatment, rehabilitation, or research) relating to drug abuse, alcoholism or alcohol abuse, infection with the human immunodeficiency virus, or sickle cell anemia which is carried out by or for the Department under this title shall, except as provided in subsections (e) and (f), be confidential, and (section 5701 of this title to the contrary notwithstanding) such records may be disclosed only for the purposes and under the circumstances expressly authorized under subsection (b). Paragraph (1) prohibits the disclosure to any person or entity other than the patient or subject concerned of the fact that a special written consent is required in order for such records to be disclosed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 32 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2006, 473 F.3d 915)“…ism or alcohol abuse, HIV infection, or sickle cell anemia (38 U.S.C. 7332). Standards for Privacy of Individua…”
- Hezekiah Green, Jr. v. Robert A. McDonald (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2016, 28 Vet. App. 281)“…h the human immunodeficiency virus, or sickle cell anemia. 38 U.S.C. § 7332 . . Notably, § 1.525(a)(1) refers…”
- Yu v. Brown (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 1995, 8 Vet. App. 184)“…nd the Board [of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) ].” Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7332 , disclosure of personally identifying…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 8111Sharing of Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense health care resourcesIn force
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense shall enter into agreements and contracts for the mutually beneficial coordination, use, or exchange of use of the health care resources of the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense with the goal of improving the access to, and quality and cost effectiveness of, the health care provided by the Veterans Health Administration and the Military Health System to the beneficiaries of both Departments. To facilitate the mutually beneficial coordination, use, or exchange of use of the health care resources of the two Departments, the two Secretaries shall carry out the following functions: Develop and publish a joint strategic vision statement and a joint strategic plan to shape, focus, and prioritize the coordination and sharing efforts among appropriate elements of the two Departments and incorporate the goals and requirements of the joint sharing plan into the strategic plan of each Department under section 306 of title 5 and the performance plan of each Department under section 1115 of title 31.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2009
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Vores v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009, 324 F. App'x 883)“…5 116 Stat. 2458 (“Stump Act”), an amendment to 38 U.S.C. § 8111 mandating the creation of a project to…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 5
§ 552aRecords maintained on individualsIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
For purposes of this section— the term “agency” means agency as defined in section 552(e) 1 See References in Text note below. of this title; the term “individual” means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence; the term “maintain” includes maintain, collect, use, or disseminate; the term “record” means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, his education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and that contains his name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph; the term “system of records” means a group of any records under the control of any agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual; the term “statistical record” means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and not used in whole or in part in making any determination about…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,701 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Siegert v. Gilley (Supreme Court of the United States 1991, 500 U.S. 226)“…n that Bartel had violated the federal Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U. S. C. § 552a, during his previous tenure with the FA…”
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (Supreme Court of the United States 1989, 489 U.S. 749)“…terized information is the Privacy Act of 1974, codified at 5 U. S. C. § 552a (1982 ed. and Supp. V). The Privacy Act…”
- Department of the Air Force v. Rose (Supreme Court of the United States 1976, 425 U.S. 352)“…ngress’ recent manifest concern in the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U. S. C. § 552a (1970 ed.; Supp. Y), for “governmental…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Federal Circuit: VA Direct Review Means No Guaranteed 90 Days to Argue, District of Columbia AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), How to Request Your Personal Data: US Privacy Rights by State
Sources and References
- Federal Register, Executive Order 14426, Accelerating Access to Veterans' Benefits and Employment Opportunities(federalregister.gov).gov
- Federal Register full text, FR Doc. 2026-18738 (Vol. 91, No. 175, pages 58003-58005)(federalregister.gov).gov
- GovInfo official PDF of the Federal Register publication of Executive Order 14426(govinfo.gov).gov
- 38 U.S.C. 5103A, Duty to assist claimants, Office of the Law Revision Counsel, United States Code(uscode.house.gov).gov
- 38 U.S.C. 7332, Confidentiality of certain medical records, Office of the Law Revision Counsel, United States Code(uscode.house.gov).gov