Delaware
Delaware Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Delaware's Automobile Warranties Act, codified at 6 Del. C. §§ 5001-5009, protects buyers and lessees of new automobiles registered in Delaware whose vehicles fail to conform to the manufacturer's express warranty after four or more repair attempts, or more than 30 cumulative days out of service, within the warranty term or one year of delivery. The consumer chooses between a full refund or a replacement vehicle.
What Is Delaware's Lemon Law?
Delaware's lemon law is officially known as the Delaware Automobile Warranties Act, codified at 6 Del. C. §§ 5001-5009. The law protects consumers who purchase or lease new vehicles that turn out to have serious, unrepairable defects.

When a new vehicle fails to meet the manufacturer's express warranty after a reasonable number of repair attempts, Delaware law entitles the consumer to a replacement vehicle or a full refund. The Delaware Attorney General's Consumer Protection Unit enforces this law and certifies manufacturer dispute settlement programs.
What Vehicles Are Covered
Under 6 Del. C. § 5001, Delaware's lemon law defines the vehicles and consumers that qualify for protection. The statute uses the term "automobile" rather than "vehicle," and understanding this definition is essential before pursuing a claim.
Covered Vehicle Types
- New passenger motor vehicles: Sedans, coupes, and similar vehicles purchased or leased new
- New trucks: Pickup trucks purchased for personal use
- New SUVs and crossovers: Sport utility vehicles and similar passenger vehicles
- New vans: Passenger vans and minivans
- Vehicles registered in Delaware: Must be registered through the Delaware Division of Motor Vehicles
Vehicles Not Covered
- Living facilities of motor homes, the only exception written into the statutory definition of "automobile" (the chassis and drivetrain may still be covered)
- Automobiles bought for purposes of resale, which fall outside the statute's definition of "consumer"
- Used vehicles bought after the manufacturer's original express warranty has expired
- Motorcycles, which are not passenger motor vehicles
- Off-road vehicles not designed for highway use, for the same reason
The definition of "automobile" contains no commercial-use or business-use exclusion. The only purchase-purpose limit anywhere in the statute is the one on vehicles bought for resale.
Who Qualifies as a "Consumer"?
Under Delaware law, a consumer includes:
- The original purchaser of a new automobile (not purchased for resale)
- A person to whom the automobile is transferred during the warranty period
- Any other person entitled by the warranty terms to enforce warranty obligations
This means that if you buy a nearly new car from a private seller while the manufacturer's warranty is still active, you may still qualify for lemon law protection.
The Lemon Law Presumption
Delaware law establishes a rebuttable presumption under 6 Del. C. § 5004 that helps consumers prove their case. When certain conditions are met within the warranty term or during the first year following original delivery (whichever is earlier), the law presumes that a reasonable number of repair attempts have been made.
When the Presumption Applies
| Condition | Requirement | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Repair Attempts (Same Problem) | 4 or more attempts | The same or substantially similar nonconformity continues to exist |
| Days Out of Service | More than 30 calendar days | Cumulative total for repair of one or more nonconformities |
| Timeframe | Warranty term or 1 year | Whichever is earlier from date of original delivery |
Important Notice Requirement: The presumption does not apply unless the manufacturer has received prior direct written notification from the consumer and has had an opportunity to repair or correct the nonconformity. If the manufacturer fails to directly attempt or arrange repairs after receiving this notice, they cannot later claim that the dealer's repairs were improper or contributed to the problem.
What Qualifies as a "Nonconformity"?
A nonconformity is a defect or condition that substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of the automobile. Common examples include:
- Engine failures or persistent engine problems
- Transmission malfunctions affecting vehicle operation
- Brake system defects that create safety hazards
- Steering problems that impair vehicle control
- Electrical system failures affecting critical components
- Fuel system leaks or persistent fuel system issues
- Airbag or safety restraint system malfunctions
- Persistent warning lights indicating unresolved mechanical issues
Minor cosmetic defects or issues that do not substantially affect the vehicle's use, value, or safety generally do not qualify.
Extension of the 30-Day Period
The 30-day out-of-service clock starts when the consumer first presents the automobile for repair and a written document describing the nonconformity is prepared. This period may be extended only if repairs cannot be performed due to conditions beyond the control of the manufacturer, its agents, or dealers. Examples include war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or other natural disaster.
Consumer Remedies: Refund vs. Replacement
When a vehicle qualifies as a lemon under Delaware law, the consumer has the unqualified right to choose between two remedies under 6 Del. C. § 5003. The choice belongs entirely to the consumer, and the manufacturer cannot override it.
Option 1: Replacement Vehicle
The manufacturer must replace the lemon vehicle with a comparable new automobile acceptable to the consumer. When providing a replacement:
- The manufacturer must accept return of the defective automobile
- The manufacturer must reimburse the consumer for all incidental costs
- Incidental costs include dealer preparation fees, registration transfer fees, sales taxes, and other charges incurred due to the replacement
- If the vehicle was financed by the manufacturer or its subsidiary, the consumer cannot be required to enter any refinancing agreement that creates financial obligations beyond those in the original financing agreement
Option 2: Refund (Repurchase)
If the consumer declines a replacement, the manufacturer must repurchase the vehicle. The refund includes:
- Full purchase price: Including all credits and allowances for any trade-in vehicle
- Related costs: Sales taxes, registration fees, and dealer preparation fees
Deductions from the Refund:
- Reasonable use allowance: Calculated as the full purchase price multiplied by the number of miles driven before the consumer first reported the nonconformity, divided by 100,000 miles
- Damage allowance: A reasonable allowance for damage not attributable to normal wear and tear (excluding damage resulting from a nonconformity)
Refund Calculation Example
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Vehicle purchase price | $35,000 |
| Sales tax and fees | $2,800 |
| Total eligible amount | $37,800 |
| Miles driven before first report | 4,000 |
| Use allowance ($35,000 x 4,000 / 100,000) | -$1,400 |
| Net refund | $36,400 |
Refunds are made to the consumer and any lienholder (such as a bank or credit union), as their interests may appear.
How to File a Lemon Law Claim in Delaware
Successfully pursuing a Delaware lemon law claim requires careful documentation and following proper procedures.
Step 1: Document All Problems and Repairs
- Keep all repair orders and work orders from every dealership visit
- Document the specific date each repair attempt began and ended
- Record the symptoms you experienced in writing each time
- Maintain copies of all correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer
- Take photographs or videos of defects when possible
- Save any diagnostic reports or error code printouts
Step 2: Report Problems Within the Coverage Period
Make sure you report the nonconformity to the manufacturer or its authorized dealer within the warranty term or within one year following original delivery, whichever is earlier. Late reporting can forfeit your rights under the lemon law.
Step 3: Provide Written Notice to the Manufacturer
Before the lemon law presumption applies, you must provide direct written notification to the manufacturer. This notice should:
- Describe the nonconformity in detail
- Include the vehicle identification number (VIN)
- Document your complete repair history with dates
- Request that the manufacturer repair or correct the problem
- Be sent via certified mail so you have proof of delivery
Step 4: Allow a Final Repair Opportunity
After providing written notice, give the manufacturer a reasonable opportunity to repair the vehicle. The manufacturer must attempt to arrange repairs through its dealer or directly.
Step 5: Pursue Resolution
If the manufacturer fails to repair the vehicle after a reasonable number of attempts, you may:
- Use the manufacturer's certified informal dispute settlement procedure (if one exists)
- File a complaint with the Delaware Consumer Protection Unit
- File a lawsuit in Delaware courts
Delaware Consumer Protection Unit Contact Information
| Method | Details |
|---|---|
| Phone (toll-free) | (800) 220-5424 |
| Phone (local) | (302) 577-8600 |
| consumer.protection@delaware.gov | |
| Online complaint form | attorneygeneral.delaware.gov/fraud/cmu/complaint |
Dispute Settlement Procedures
Under 6 Del. C. § 5007, Delaware law addresses manufacturer informal dispute settlement procedures and their certification requirements.
When Arbitration Is Required
If a manufacturer has established an informal dispute settlement procedure that has received a certificate of approval from the Delaware Division of Consumer Protection, consumers must first use that procedure before accessing lemon law remedies. If the manufacturer's procedure is not certified, consumers may immediately and directly seek lemon law remedies without arbitration. As of 2026, American Honda Motor Company is the only manufacturer with a currently registered and approved procedure in Delaware.
Standards for Certified Programs
To receive certification, a manufacturer's dispute settlement procedure must:
- Comply with 16 C.F.R. Part 703 (FTC regulations for informal dispute settlement procedures)
- Not convene hearings or meetings outside the State of Delaware
- Issue decisions within 65 days after the consumer initiates the dispute
- Perform awarded remedies within 30 days after the consumer accepts the decision
- Not require the consumer to make the automobile available more than once for inspection or more than once for repair of the same nonconformity
- Consider all remedies provided by Delaware's lemon law, including repair, replacement, and refund
Annual Evaluation
The Division of Consumer Protection annually evaluates the operation of manufacturer dispute settlement procedures and issues certificates of approval to those that comply with the requirements. The Division may suspend or decertify any procedure that falls out of compliance.
Manufacturer Defenses
Under 6 Del. C. § 5006, manufacturers may raise certain affirmative defenses to lemon law claims.
Valid Affirmative Defenses
| Defense | Manufacturer's Argument | Consumer's Counter |
|---|---|---|
| Defect not substantial | Nonconformity does not substantially impair use, value, or safety | Document how the defect affects daily driving, resale value, or safety |
| Consumer abuse or neglect | Nonconformity resulted from consumer abuse or neglect | Provide maintenance records showing proper care |
| Unauthorized modifications | Nonconformity resulted from unauthorized modifications or alterations | Show defect existed before modifications or is unrelated |
The burden of proving these defenses falls on the manufacturer. The consumer does not need to prove that they did not abuse or modify the vehicle.
Dealer Liability Protections
Delaware law specifically addresses dealer liability in lemon law cases. Under 6 Del. C. § 5003(e), no authorized dealer may be held liable by the manufacturer for any refunds or automobile replacements unless there is evidence that the dealership carried out repairs in a manner inconsistent with the manufacturer's instructions.
This provision protects dealers who follow manufacturer repair procedures. At the same time, it prevents manufacturers from escaping liability by blaming dealer repair work.
Attorney Fees and Legal Costs
Under 6 Del. C. § 5005, the court may award reasonable attorney fees and costs to a consumer who prevails in a lemon law action against a manufacturer, the manufacturer's agent, or an authorized dealer.
However, this provision works both ways. If the court determines that the consumer's lawsuit was brought in bad faith or was frivolous, the court may award attorney fees to the manufacturer instead.
Federal Protection: Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Delaware's lemon law operates alongside a federal backstop: the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301. This federal law governs written warranties on consumer products, including motor vehicles. If a manufacturer's warranty fails of its essential purpose, Magnuson-Moss allows consumers to sue in federal court for damages, including attorney fees.
For Delaware consumers, Magnuson-Moss is especially useful in two situations: when the state lemon law's one-year reporting window has closed, but the manufacturer's express warranty is still in effect; or when a used vehicle is covered only by a warranty other than the original manufacturer's express warranty (Delaware's lemon law itself already covers a used vehicle transferred to you while the manufacturer's original express warranty is still running, see "Who Qualifies as a 'Consumer'" above). Federal courts have found Magnuson-Moss claims viable even after state lemon law windows expire, so preserving your repair records is important regardless of which path you pursue.
Connection to Delaware Consumer Fraud Act
Delaware's lemon law has two provisions that strengthen consumer protections beyond the specific remedies in the Automobile Warranties Act.
Unlawful Practice (Section 5009)
A violation of the lemon law is also an unlawful practice under 6 Del. C. § 2513. This means consumers may have access to additional remedies and enforcement tools available under Delaware's broader Consumer Fraud Act.
Cumulative Remedies (Section 5008)
The lemon law does not limit any rights or remedies a consumer may have at law or in equity under Subtitle I of Title 6. Consumers can pursue lemon law claims alongside other legal theories, such as breach of warranty under the Uniform Commercial Code or claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.
Branded Titles and Dealer Disclosure
Delaware does not brand the title of a lemon law buyback. Chapter 50 contains no title-branding provision, and the brand-disclosure statute in the motor vehicle code, 21 Del. C. § 6309(d), reaches only four designations: a title branded "reconstructed", "flood damaged", "salvage", or a vehicle that "was a 'taxi'". A vehicle the manufacturer repurchased under the lemon law carries no brand of its own under Delaware law, so a vehicle history report and the service records are the practical way to spot one.
Where one of those four brands does apply, the disclosure duty is strict. A dealer or agent must disclose the brand to the buyer, and the buyer signs a disclosure statement approved by the Division of Motor Vehicles and supplied by the dealership, a copy of which goes to the DMV with the title application. In the absence of any disclosure statement, § 6309(d) provides that the contract may be rescinded at any time by the buyer and the dealer must give a full and complete refund of all purchase moneys, including interest paid, plus all fees paid.
Electric Vehicle Considerations
Electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrids are covered under Delaware's lemon law to the same extent as conventional vehicles. However, EV owners should be aware of unique considerations.
Common EV Defects That May Qualify
- Battery capacity degradation beyond manufacturer specifications
- Charging system malfunctions preventing normal charging
- Range significantly below manufacturer representations
- Electric motor failures affecting vehicle operation
- Software defects affecting vehicle performance or safety
- Thermal management system failures
- Regenerative braking malfunctions
EV-Specific Documentation Tips
When pursuing a lemon law claim for an EV, document:
- Charging records showing system failures or abnormal behavior
- Range data demonstrating performance below specifications
- Software version history and update records
- Error codes and diagnostic reports from each service visit
Statute of Limitations and Key Deadlines
Timing is critical for Delaware lemon law claims. Missing a deadline can forfeit your rights.
Key Deadlines
| Deadline | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Reporting period | Report the nonconformity within the warranty term or 1 year of delivery, whichever is earlier |
| Written notice | Must be sent to the manufacturer before the presumption applies |
| Arbitration decision | Must be issued within 65 days of consumer initiating dispute |
| Arbitration remedy | Must be performed within 30 days of consumer accepting the decision |
| Court action | 4 years for breach of a contract for sale (6 Del. C. § 2-725); 3 years for a claim based on a statute, including the Consumer Fraud Act (10 Del. C. § 8106) |
Routing a claim through the Consumer Fraud Act does not buy a consumer more time. An action based on a statute must be brought within 3 years under 10 Del. C. § 8106, while a breach-of-warranty claim on a contract for sale runs 4 years under 6 Del. C. § 2-725. The Consumer Fraud Act adds remedies, not runway.
Alternatives for Used Vehicle Buyers
Delaware's lemon law applies to new automobiles, and to a used vehicle only if you received it by transfer while the manufacturer's original express warranty was still active (see "Who Qualifies as a 'Consumer'" above). If you bought a used vehicle after that warranty had already expired and it has serious defects, you may still have legal options:
- Delaware Consumer Fraud Act: If the seller engaged in deceptive practices or failed to disclose known defects, you may have a claim under 6 Del. C. § 2513
- Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act: This federal law protects consumers who purchase products with written warranties, including used vehicles still under factory warranty
- Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): Delaware's UCC provisions on implied warranties of merchantability may apply to used vehicle sales
- Branded-title disclosure: If a dealer sold you a vehicle whose title was branded "reconstructed", "flood damaged", "salvage" or a former "taxi" without the signed disclosure statement, 21 Del. C. § 6309(d) lets you rescind the contract at any time and recover all purchase moneys, interest and fees
Contact the Delaware Consumer Mediation Unit at (800) 220-5424 or file a complaint at attorneygeneral.delaware.gov/fraud/cmu/complaint if you believe you were sold a defective used vehicle through deceptive practices.
More Delaware Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How many repair attempts are required before my vehicle qualifies as a lemon in Delaware?
Under Delaware law, a vehicle may qualify as a lemon after four or more repair attempts for substantially the same nonconformity, or if the vehicle has been out of service for more than 30 cumulative calendar days for repairs. These conditions must occur within the warranty term or during the first year following original delivery, whichever is earlier. You must also provide written notice directly to the manufacturer before the presumption applies.
Does Delaware's lemon law cover used vehicles?
It depends. Delaware's lemon law generally covers new automobiles, but its definition of consumer also includes someone who received the vehicle by transfer while the manufacturer's original express warranty was still active, so a used vehicle transferred to you during that warranty period can still qualify. A used vehicle bought after the original warranty already expired is not covered, though you may have other remedies under Delaware's Consumer Fraud Act, the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, or the Uniform Commercial Code's implied warranty provisions.
Can I choose between a refund and a replacement vehicle?
Yes. Delaware law gives consumers the unqualified right to choose between a replacement vehicle and a full refund. This means the manufacturer cannot force you to accept a replacement if you prefer a refund, and vice versa. The choice belongs entirely to the consumer.
How is the usage deduction calculated in a Delaware lemon law refund?
The usage deduction is calculated by multiplying the full purchase price by the number of miles driven before you first reported the nonconformity, then dividing by 100,000. For example, if you paid $35,000 for your vehicle and drove 4,000 miles before reporting the defect, the usage deduction would be $1,400 ($35,000 x 4,000 / 100,000).
Do I have to use the manufacturer's arbitration program before filing a lawsuit?
Only if the manufacturer has an informal dispute settlement procedure that has been certified by Delaware's Division of Consumer Protection. If the manufacturer's program is not certified, you may immediately pursue legal remedies without first going through arbitration. The certified program must issue a decision within 65 days and perform any awarded remedy within 30 days.
Updates
Corrected the citation to the Automobile Warranties Act, removed a commercial-use coverage exclusion the statute does not contain, replaced the title-branding section after confirming Delaware brands no lemon law buyback, and corrected the statute of limitations comparison between Consumer Fraud Act and warranty claims.
Corrected the page so it consistently reflects that Delaware's lemon law covers a used vehicle if it was transferred to you while the manufacturer's original warranty was still active, matching the statute's own definition of 'consumer' (6 Del. C. section 5001), instead of contradicting itself about used-vehicle coverage in four different places.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Delaware Code, Title 6 (Commerce and Trade), Chapter 050 (AUTOMOBILE WARRANTIES)
§ 5003Remedies upon failure to repair.In force
(a) If the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer does not conform the automobile to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any nonconformity after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer shall either replace the automobile with a comparable new automobile acceptable to the consumer or repurchase the automobile from the consumer and refund to the consumer the full purchase, including all credits and allowances for any trade-in vehicle; provided, however, that the consumer shall have the unqualified right to decline a replacement automobile and to demand instead a repurchase. (b) In instances in which an automobile is replaced by a manufacturer under this section, said manufacturer shall accept return of the automobile and reimburse the consumer for any incidental costs, including dealer preparation fees, fees for transfer of registration, sales taxes or other charges or fees incurred by the consumer as a result of such replacement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
§ 5004Presumptions.In force
(a) It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a new automobile to the manufacturer’s express warranty if, within the warranty term or during the period of 1 year following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date: (1) Substantially the same nonconformity has been subject to repair or correction 4 or more times by the manufacturer, its agents or its dealers and the nonconformity continues to exist; or (2) The automobile is out of service by reason of repair or correction of a nonconformity by the manufacturer, its agents or its dealers for a cumulative total of more than 30 calendar days since the original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer. This 30-day limit shall commence with the first day on which the consumer presents the automobile to the manufacturer, its agent or dealer for service of the nonconformity and a written document describing the nonconformity is prepared by the manufacturer, its agent or dealer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1991
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Harmon v. Concord Volkswagen, Inc. (Superior Court of Delaware 1991, 598 A.2d 696)“…aware law. Cf. 73 Purdon, § 1956; 6 Del.C. § 5004. Both statutes give the purchaser the o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5001Definitions.In force
As used in this chapter: (1) “Automobile” means any passenger motor vehicle which is leased or bought in Delaware or registered by the Division of Motor Vehicles in the Department of Transportation except the living facilities of motor homes. (2) “Consumer” means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of an automobile; a person to whom an automobile is transferred during the duration of an express warranty applicable to the automobile; or any other person entitled by the terms of the warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty. (3) “Dealer” means a person actively engaged in the business of buying, selling or exchanging automobiles at retail and who has an established place of business. (4) “Lien” means a security interest in an automobile. (5) “Lienholder” means a person with a security interest in an automobile pursuant to a lien. (6) “Manufacturer” means a person engaged in the business of manufacturing, assembling or distributing automobiles, who will, under normal business conditions during the year, manufacture, assemble or distribute to dealers at least 10 new automobiles.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Harmon v. Concord Volkswagen, Inc. (Superior Court of Delaware 1991, 598 A.2d 696)“…ent of Safety except the living facilities of motor homes.” 6 Del.C. § 5001(5). Accepting the affidavit of J. Harmo…”
- Mercedes-Benz of North America Inc. v. Norman Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc. (Supreme Court of Delaware 1991, 596 A.2d 1358)“…claim against MBNA for violation of the Delaware Lemon Law, 6 Del.C. § 5001, et seq. The jury, by special in…”
- Wolfe v. Intermeccanica International, Inc. (District Court, D. Delaware 2024)“…iff accuses Defendants of violating the Delaware Lemon Law, 6 Del. C. § 5001 et seq., related consumer protection s…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5006Affirmative defense to claim.In force
It shall be an affirmative defense to a claim under this chapter that the alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, value or safety of the new automobile or that the nonconformity is the result of abuse or neglect or of unauthorized modifications or alterations of the new automobile by anyone other than the manufacturer, its agent or dealer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
§ 5007Informal dispute settlement procedure.In force
(a) If a manufacturer has established an informal settlement procedure that has a certificate of approval by the Division of Consumer Protection, the remedies provided by this chapter shall not be available to any consumer who has not first resorted to such procedure. In the event a manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure does not have a certificate of approval from the Division of Consumer Protection, a consumer may immediately and directly seek the remedies provided by this chapter. (b) The Division of Consumer Protection shall annually evaluate the operation of informal dispute settlement procedures established by manufacturers and shall issue an annual certificate of approval to those manufacturers whose procedures comply with Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 703 and with subsections (c), (d) and (e) of this section. The Division of Consumer Protection shall suspend the certification of, or decertify, any informal dispute settlement which no longer complies with said provisions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1991
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Harmon v. Concord Volkswagen, Inc. (Superior Court of Delaware 1991, 598 A.2d 696)“…r repairs. This happened on at least three occasions. While 6 Del. C. § 5007 does permit an informal settlement proc…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5005Costs and attorneys’ fees in breach of warranty actions.In force
In any court action brought under this chapter by a consumer against the manufacturer of an automobile, or the manufacturer’s agent or authorized dealer, based upon the alleged breach of an express warranty made in connection with the sale of such automobile, the court, in its discretion, may award the plaintiff’s costs and reasonable attorney’s fees or, if the court determines that the action is brought in bad faith or is frivolous in nature, may award reasonable attorney’s fees to the defendant.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1991
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mercedes-Benz of North America Inc. v. Norman Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc. (Supreme Court of Delaware 1991, 596 A.2d 1358)“…arranties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2310 (d)(2); (2) the Lemon Law, 6 Del. C. § 5005; and (3) the Deceptive Trade Practices…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5008Remedies cumulative.In force
Nothing in this chapter shall in any way limit the rights or remedies available to a consumer under Subtitle I of this title.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1991
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Harmon v. Concord Volkswagen, Inc. (Superior Court of Delaware 1991, 598 A.2d 696)“…e additional protection and remedies for the buying public. 6 Del. C. §§ 5008, 5009. Therefore, the remedies should b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5009Enforcement.In force
In addition to any remedies the consumer may have at law or in equity, a violation of this chapter shall be an unlawful practice as defined in § 2513 of this title. The Division of Consumer Protection shall promulgate rules and regulations in order to implement the purposes of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Delaware Code, Title 6 (Commerce and Trade), Chapter 025 (PROHIBITED TRADE PRACTICES)
§ 2513Unlawful practice.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) The act, use, or employment by any person of any deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, unfair practice, or the concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact with intent that others rely upon such concealment, suppression, or omission, in connection with the sale, lease, receipt, or advertisement of any merchandise, whether or not any person has in fact been misled, deceived, or damaged thereby, is an unlawful practice. It shall also be an unlawful practice to misrepresent the geographic location of a business or supplier which raises or sells flowers and/or ornamental plants by any of the following: (1) Listing a local telephone number in a local telephone directory if: a. Calls to the telephone number are routinely forwarded or otherwise transferred to a business location that is outside the calling area covered by the local telephone directory other than to counties contiguous to this State; and b. The listing fails to identify the locality and state of the supplier’s business; or (2) Listing a fictitious business name or an assumed business name in a local telephone directory if: a.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 85 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pack & Process, Inc. v. Celotex Corp. (Superior Court of Delaware 1985, 503 A.2d 646)“…of false representation in violation of the common law and 6 Del.C. § 2513. 1 The plaintiff claims th…”
- Young v. Joyce (Supreme Court of Delaware 1975, 351 A.2d 857)“…action may not be maintained for statutory consumer fraud, -6 Del.C. § 2513(a), 1 that cost of repairs…”
- In Re Brandywine Volkswagen, Ltd. (Superior Court of Delaware 1973, 306 A.2d 24)“…the Order.” This case turns on the interpretation of 6 Del.C. § 2513. Sections 2511 through 2527 were enacte…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
United States Code Title 15
§ 2301DefinitionsIn forcecited in 41 of our articles
For the purposes of this chapter: The term “consumer product” means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. The term “consumer” means a buyer (other than for purposes of resale) of any consumer product, any person to whom such product is transferred during the duration of an implied or written warranty (or service contract) applicable to the product, and any other person who is entitled by the terms of such warranty (or service contract) or under applicable State law to enforce against the warrantor (or service contractor) the obligations of the warranty (or service contract). The term “supplier” means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers. The term “warrantor” means any supplier or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty or who is or may be obligated under an implied warranty.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,671 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (1986) held that except where Magnuson-Moss expressly prescribes a rule, the Act applies state written and implied warranty law, citing Section 2301(7)'s definition of implied warranty as one arising under state law. Birdsong v. Apple (2009) dismissed Act claims once the state warranty claims failed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1986, 807 F.2d 1000)✓Ford owners sought nationwide classes over transmissions that slipped from park into reverse; reading Section 2301(7) and (6), the D.C. Circuit held Magnuson-Moss applies state warranty law except where the Act expressly prescribes a rule, and vacated class certification.
- Birdsong v. Apple, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2009, 590 F.3d 955)✓iPod buyers alleged the player risked hearing loss; because Section 2301(7) ties implied warranty to state law, the Ninth Circuit treated the Magnuson-Moss claim as standing or falling with the California warranty claims and affirmed dismissal once those failed.
- Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2004, 377 F.3d 1034)“…gnizable under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. This consumer dis…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: US Lemon Laws (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Alabama Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify and Get a Refund, Arkansas Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
Delaware Code, Title 10 (Courts and Judicial Procedure), Chapter 081 (PERSONAL ACTIONS)
§ 8106Actions subject to 3-year limitation.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) No action to recover damages for trespass, no action to regain possession of personal chattels, no action to recover damages for the detention of personal chattels, no action to recover a debt not evidenced by a record or by an instrument under seal, no action based on a detailed statement of the mutual demands in the nature of debit and credit between parties arising out of contractual or fiduciary relations, no action based on a promise, no action based on a statute, and no action to recover damages caused by an injury unaccompanied with force or resulting indirectly from the act of the defendant shall be brought after the expiration of 3 years from the accruing of the cause of such action; subject, however, to the provisions of §§ 8108-8110, 8119 and 8127 of this title. (b) Contractual limitations.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 536 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Harold Kraft v. Wisdomtree Investments, Inc. (Court of Chancery of Delaware 2016, 145 A.3d 969)“…ute of limitations governing actions “based on a statute” (10 Del. C. § 8106) or, in the alternative, based on the d…”
- Stifel Financial Corp. v. Cochran (Supreme Court of Delaware 2002, 809 A.2d 555)“…ims were governed by the three year limitation contained in 10 Del.C. § 8106. Because Cochran’s claims were clearly…”
- State Ex Rel. Brady v. Pettinaro Enterprises (Court of Chancery of Delaware 2005, 870 A.2d 513)“…ign capacity- — from the three-year limitation period under 10 Del. C. § 8106 that generally applies to actions arisi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Delaware Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
Delaware Code, Title 21 (Motor Vehicles), Chapter 063 (SALE OF MOTOR VEHICLES)
§ 6309Prohibited acts.In force
(a) A dealer, its agent or an employee of a dealer may not permit any individual to road test a motor vehicle if they know the individual does not have a valid driver’s license. (b) A dealer or an agent or employee of a dealer may not commit any fraud in the execution of, or any material alteration of, a contract, power of attorney or other document incident to a sale or exchange of a vehicle. (c) A dealer or an agent or employee of a dealer may not wilfully fail to comply with the terms of a warranty or guarantee. A Federal Trade Commission Buyers Guide will be properly completed and displayed on all used vehicles. Buyer(s) will be provided a copy of the Guide prior to completion of the sale. (d) A dealer or agent of a dealer must disclose to a buyer if the vehicle title has been branded “reconstructed”, “flood damaged”, “salvage” or was a “taxi”. The buyer(s) shall acknowledge the disclosure as described in this subsection by signing a disclosure statement which has been approved by the Division of Motor Vehicles and is provided by the dealership. A copy of the disclosure statement shall be provided to the Delaware Division of Motor Vehicles with the title application.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Roland Anderson v. Wolf's Elite Auto II (Delaware Court of Common Pleas 2025)“…according to Mr. Anderson, ultimately came to fruition. 16 21 Del. C. § 6309(d). 17 Smith v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- Delaware Code Title 6, Chapter 50: Automobile Warranties(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- Delaware Attorney General: Lemon Law Information(attorneygeneral.delaware.gov).gov
- Delaware Department of Justice: Consumer Protection Unit(attorneygeneral.delaware.gov).gov
- Delaware DMV: Lemon Law and Title Branding(dmv.de.gov).gov
- Delaware Consumer Mediation Unit: File a Complaint(attorneygeneral.delaware.gov).gov
- Delaware Code Title 6, Chapter 25: Consumer Fraud Act(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- Federal Trade Commission: Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act(ftc.gov).gov
- 16 C.F.R. Part 703: Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures(ecfr.gov).gov
- 21 Del. C. § 6309: Prohibited Acts (branded-title disclosure)(delcode.delaware.gov)
- 10 Del. C. § 8106: Three-Year Limitation on Actions Based on a Statute(delcode.delaware.gov)
- 6 Del. C. § 2-725: Four-Year Limitation for Breach of a Contract for Sale(delcode.delaware.gov)