Oregon
Oregon Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 3, 2026). · 17 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Oregon has two state laws a scam victim can use to sue, and they work very differently. The Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA) lets a person who lost money or property because of a business's willful unlawful practice recover actual damages or $200, whichever is greater, but there is no automatic multiplier, attorney's fees are up to the court, and the suit must start within one year after you discover the practice. A separate law for older and vulnerable adults, ORS 124.100, is far stronger: a person 65 or older who is financially abused can recover three times their economic damages plus mandatory attorney's fees, against anyone who wrongfully took the money, with seven years from discovery to sue.
Oregon banks may also refuse a suspicious transaction from a vulnerable person's account for up to 15 business days, and the Oregon Department of Justice takes scam complaints online and through a consumer hotline. A complaint is not a lawsuit, though, and it does not stop your deadlines from running.
Information last verified on October 2, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This guide covers Oregon state law: the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (ORS 646.605 to 646.656), Oregon complaint offices, the civil and criminal protections for older and vulnerable adults, other Oregon laws that apply to common scams, and Oregon deadlines for suing. Federal refund and reporting rights are summarized briefly and covered in depth on our national guides. Out of scope: criminal defense, and the law of other states (if the scammer or business is elsewhere, that state's law may also matter).
First steps if you were scammed in Oregon
Call the bank, card issuer, payment app, wire company or crypto exchange that moved your money first. That company is usually the only one that can stop or reverse a payment, and your federal rights depend on how you paid. Our guide on how to get money back after a scam covers each payment method, and the Zelle and payment app guide covers app transfers. If your bank said no, see what to do when a bank refuses a scam refund.
Then report it. Most scams go to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and online crime to the FBI's IC3; our where to report a scam guide lists every federal channel. The Oregon offices below are in addition to those. If the scammer has your Social Security number, bank login or other personal details, see what to do when a scammer has your information and our Oregon identity theft guide.
Where to report a scam in Oregon
| What happened | Oregon office | What it does with your report |
|---|---|---|
| A business or person scammed or misled you, or you did not get what you paid for | Oregon Department of Justice, consumer complaints (online), or the Consumer Hotline at 1-877-877-9392 | Offers voluntary mediation with a business, which it cannot force to take part or to take any action. It cannot act as your lawyer or give legal advice. |
| A problem with a bank, credit union, mortgage company, investment or collection company | Division of Financial Regulation (DFR), toll free 888-877-4894 | Looks into complaints about companies and individuals in the finance and insurance industries. Its financial-services complaint form is also offered in Spanish. |
| An older or vulnerable adult is being taken advantage of financially | Oregon Department of Human Services abuse reporting, 855-503-SAFE (7233) | Takes reports when an older person or vulnerable adult is being abused, neglected or "taken advantage of financially." If someone is in danger right now, call 911. |
The Department of Justice complaint system gives you options, and it is candid about their limits. On mediation, it says: "This process is voluntary mediation, and the Program cannot require a business to engage nor compel the business to take a specific action." If you file to support an investigation instead, it says it "cannot confirm or deny the existence of an investigation." The form lets you mark that you are over 65 and that English is not your first language, and it reminds you that if you paid by credit card, "the card issuer may offer relief (or protection)."
Two warnings from the office itself matter for your money. First, "Oregon law has short deadlines for starting a lawsuit," and "Filing a complaint with the Oregon Department of Justice does not extend your legal deadlines." Second, it says that if you want to take legal action, "please contact a private attorney or file suit in local small claims court." The UTPA's one-year clock (below) keeps running while your complaint is open.
The Division of Financial Regulation says it is not a law firm either: "We are not attorneys and cannot act as your legal representative." It adds that "Most complaints are resolved within 60 days, but it depends on the type of complaint."
Oregon's consumer protection law: can you sue?
Sometimes. The UTPA's private lawsuit is in ORS 646.638(1):
"a person that suffers an ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal, as a result of another person's willful use or employment of a method, act or practice declared unlawful under ORS 646.608, may bring an individual action in an appropriate court to recover actual damages or statutory damages of $200, whichever is greater. The court or the jury may award punitive damages and the court may provide any equitable relief the court considers necessary or proper."
Each part of that sentence is a condition you must meet:
- You lost money or property. The statute calls this an "ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal."
- The loss came from a practice the UTPA makes unlawful. ORS 646.608(1) lists the unlawful practices. One is a catch-all: "Engages in any other unfair or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce." Another covers someone who falsely claims "a sponsorship, approval, status, qualification, affiliation, or connection" they do not have.
- The defendant acted in business. ORS 646.608(1) applies only to a person acting "in the course of the person's business, vocation or occupation." Many scams are run as a business, but whether a particular scammer meets that test is a question about the facts, not a given.
- The violation was willful. Under ORS 646.605(10), "A willful violation occurs when the person committing the violation knew or should have known that the conduct of the person was a violation." Proof that the defendant should have known is enough.
The Oregon text does not limit the lawsuit to a "consumer." Any "person" who meets the conditions above may sue. The act does define the goods and services it covers as those obtained "primarily for personal, family or household purposes," or for any purpose as a result of a telephone solicitation, and it does not cover insurance. Whether your scam fits these terms depends on what happened, and an Oregon lawyer can tell you.
What you can recover
The base recovery is your actual damages or $200, whichever is greater. There is no automatic doubling or tripling. The court or jury "may" add punitive damages, and the court may order equitable relief, such as an order to stop the practice.
Attorney fees are up to the judge. Under ORS 646.638(3), "The court may award reasonable attorney fees and costs at trial and on appeal to a prevailing plaintiff." A winning defendant can recover its fees only if the court finds "an objectively reasonable basis for bringing the action or asserting the ground for appeal did not exist." Class actions are also allowed under the UTPA.
No demand letter, but the Attorney General gets a copy
Oregon does not require you to send the business a demand letter before suing. It does require you to mail a copy of your complaint to the Attorney General "at the time the action commences," and a court "may not enter judgment for the plaintiff until proof of mailing is filed."
The one-year deadline
This is the rule most likely to cost a scam victim their claim. ORS 646.638(6) says: "Actions brought under this section must be commenced within one year after the discovery of the unlawful method, act or practice." One year goes quickly when you are dealing with a bank dispute or waiting on a complaint, so if a UTPA suit is possible, act early.
The honest limit
A UTPA case needs a defendant you can identify, serve and collect from, and it needs that defendant to have been acting in business. That can work against an Oregon business, contractor or seller with a real address. It usually does not work against an anonymous scammer behind a spoofed number or an overseas account, and a judgment does not help if no one can be found to pay it.
Protections for older adults in Oregon
A stronger lawsuit: ORS 124.100

Oregon gives older and vulnerable adults their own civil remedy for financial abuse, and it is much stronger than the UTPA. "Vulnerable person" includes an "elderly person," meaning "a person 65 years of age or older," as well as a person who is financially incapable, incapacitated, or has a disability and is susceptible to "force, threat, duress, coercion, persuasion or physical or emotional injury."
Under ORS 124.100(2), a vulnerable person who suffers financial abuse "may bring an action against any person who has caused the physical or financial abuse or who has permitted another person to engage in physical or financial abuse." The court "shall award" a plaintiff who wins:
- three times all economic damages, or $500, whichever is greater;
- three times all noneconomic damages;
- reasonable attorney fees; and
- reasonable fees for a conservator or guardian ad litem.
Financial abuse includes when a person "wrongfully takes or appropriates money or property of a vulnerable person, without regard to whether the person taking or appropriating the money or property has a fiduciary relationship with the vulnerable person" (ORS 124.110(1)(a)). That means the law can reach a stranger who scammed an older person, not only a relative, caregiver or financial agent. It can also reach someone who knowingly let the abuse happen.
The case can be brought by the vulnerable person, or by their guardian, conservator or attorney-in-fact, the personal representative of their estate, or a trustee. Under ORS 124.130, it "must be commenced within seven years after discovery of the conduct." As with the UTPA, a copy of the complaint must be mailed to the Attorney General.
The bank exception
You cannot use ORS 124.100 against your own bank for letting a scam payment through, in most cases. ORS 124.115(1) says the action "may not be brought against" financial institutions, health care facilities, facilities licensed or registered under ORS chapter 443, or licensed broker-dealers. The exception is if that institution is convicted of one of the crimes listed in ORS 124.105(1), or engages in financial abuse and is convicted of a crime because of that conduct.
Bank holds when exploitation is suspected
Under ORS 708A.675, when a bank or credit union "reasonably believes" that "financial exploitation of a vulnerable person may have occurred, may have been attempted or is being attempted," it "may but is not required to" refuse a transaction or refuse a withdrawal or disbursement of funds, among other steps. So a bank can stop a payment you are worried about, but Oregon law does not make it.
The bank must make "a reasonable effort to notify, orally or in writing, all parties currently authorized to transact business on the account," unless notice could compromise an investigation. The hold ends no later than "Fifteen business days after the date on which the financial institution first acted," or sooner if the bank is satisfied or a court ends it, but the bank may extend it if it reasonably believes the exploitation may continue. If you are worried about a parent's account, tell the bank directly that you suspect a scam.
Investment firms have a parallel rule. Under ORS 59.485, a securities salesperson, investment adviser representative or supervisory or compliance staff member who has reasonable cause to believe a vulnerable person is being financially exploited "shall, as soon as is practicable, notify the Department of Consumer and Business Services." A broker-dealer may delay a disbursement for up to 15 business days, or up to 25 business days if the department asks (ORS 59.495).
Bank and credit union employees are not on Oregon's list of mandatory reporters of elder abuse in ORS 124.050. Anyone can still report to 855-503-SAFE (7233).
Criminal penalties
Prosecutors, not victims, bring these cases, and a criminal sentence is not money paid to you.
- Theft in the first degree (ORS 164.055), a Class C felony, covers theft by means other than extortion of property worth $1,000 or more. A 2026 law (Oregon Laws 2026, chapter 14) raises that line to $1,500; it takes effect on January 1, 2027, for conduct on or after that date.
- Aggravated theft in the first degree (ORS 164.057), a Class B felony, applies when the property is worth $10,000 or more. Under ORS 164.061, if the victim was 65 or older and the value was $10,000 or more, the court "shall sentence the person to a term of incarceration ranging from 16 months to 45 months, depending on the person's criminal history."
- Criminal mistreatment in the first degree (ORS 163.205) reaches only someone with a legal duty to care for an elderly or dependent person, or who took on their care, such as a person who takes their money outside their lawful responsibilities. It does not reach a stranger who scammed them.
For fraud against anyone 60 or older, the federal DOJ National Elder Fraud Hotline (833-372-8311) can also help you report. Our elder fraud guide covers federal protections and family steps.
Oregon scam laws on the books
Immigration consultants (notario fraud)

Under ORS 9.280(1), acting as an immigration consultant in Oregon for pay is a violation "unless the person is an active licensee of the Oregon State Bar," with an exception for people federal law authorizes to represent others before the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Justice. ORS 646.608(1)(uuu) also makes it an unlawful trade practice, so a person who lost money to an unauthorized consultant can use the UTPA lawsuit described above, subject to the same conditions and one-year deadline. See our guide to notario fraud.
Telemarketers and do-not-call
Under ORS 646.553(1), "A telephonic seller shall not conduct business in this state without having registered with the Department of Justice at least 10 days prior to the conduct of such business." A violation of Oregon's do-not-call statute (ORS 646.569), or of ORS 646A.374, which bars robocallers from misrepresenting or falsifying their identity, number, location or purpose, is an unlawful trade practice under ORS 646.608(1)(ff). Since January 1, 2026, Oregon Laws 2025, chapter 580 has applied ORS 646A.374 and Oregon's telephone-solicitation rules in ORS 646.561 to 646.565 to text messages as well as calls. For scam calls and texts, see our phishing, smishing and vishing guide.
Door-to-door sales: three business days to cancel
Under ORS 83.720, "the buyer has the right to cancel a home solicitation sale until 12 midnight of the third business day after the day on which the buyer signs an agreement or offer to purchase" or pays by cash or check. A home solicitation sale is one where the seller personally solicits it and the agreement is made somewhere other than the seller's place of business, even if you invited the seller. You lose the right only if you started the contact; in a separate signed writing not supplied by the seller you asked for the work without delay because of an emergency, described the emergency and waived the right to cancel; the seller in good faith made a substantial beginning before you cancelled; and, for goods, they cannot be returned in substantially as good condition.
Crypto ATMs (virtual currency kiosks)
As of October 2026, we found no Oregon law aimed specifically at crypto ATMs (virtual currency kiosks). The Oregon Legislature's bill records show no crypto ATM or kiosk bill in the 2025 or 2026 sessions, and Oregon's money transmitter law (ORS chapter 717) contains no kiosk-specific daily limits, fee caps or refund rules. If a scammer told you to deposit cash into a crypto ATM, report it to the FBI's IC3 and the FTC right away, and see our crypto and investment scams guide.
Suing a scammer or a business in Oregon
Small claims. Under ORS 46.405(3), a claim "may be commenced and prosecuted in the small claims department if the amount or value claimed in the action does not exceed $10,000." That is the usual place for a modest claim against a business or person you can identify and serve.
Deadlines. A UTPA claim has the one-year limit above, and an ORS 124.100 claim has seven years. A fraud claim falls under ORS 12.110(1), which sets two years for injury "not arising on contract" and provides that "in an action at law based upon fraud or deceit, the limitation shall be deemed to commence only from the discovery of the fraud or deceit." Our Oregon statute of limitations guide covers other civil deadlines.
Who you can actually reach. Lawsuits work against people and businesses with a name, an address and assets. A scammer who hid behind a fake identity, a spoofed caller ID or an overseas account is usually not reachable through an Oregon court. In those cases your payment company, a fast report to law enforcement, and protecting your identity are where your effort pays off. Our guide on when a lawyer helps after a scam explains when legal help is worth it. If a debt collector is chasing you for a debt a scammer created, see Oregon debt collection laws.
Related guides
- Scams and fraud: your rights and where to start
- How to get money back after a scam
- Where to report a scam
- Elder fraud
- Crypto and investment scams
- Oregon identity theft laws
- Oregon debt collection laws
- Oregon statute of limitations
Last updated: October 2, 2026.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, contact your payment company, the Oregon office named above, or a lawyer licensed in Oregon.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue a scammer in Oregon?
Possibly, if you can identify and serve them. Under ORS 646.638 you can sue if you lost money or property because of a willful unlawful practice by someone acting in the course of their business, you can recover actual damages or $200, whichever is greater, and you must file within one year of discovering it. An anonymous or overseas scammer is usually not reachable through an Oregon court.
Does the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act award triple damages?
No. ORS 646.638 allows actual damages or $200, whichever is greater, and a court or jury may add punitive damages. Triple damages are available under a different law, ORS 124.100, for financial abuse of a person 65 or older or another vulnerable person.
How long do I have to sue under the Oregon UTPA?
One year after discovering the unlawful practice, under ORS 646.638(6). Filing a complaint with the Oregon Department of Justice does not extend that deadline.
Will the UTPA pay my attorney fees?
Maybe. Under ORS 646.638(3) the court may award reasonable attorney fees and costs to a winning plaintiff, but it is not required to. In an ORS 124.100 elder financial abuse case, the court must award reasonable attorney fees to a winning plaintiff.
Can an older person in Oregon get triple damages after a scam?
Yes, if they win under ORS 124.100. A person 65 or older, or another vulnerable person, who proves someone wrongfully took their money can recover three times economic damages (or $500, whichever is greater) plus attorney fees, within seven years after discovery. The suit cannot be brought against a bank or broker-dealer unless it is convicted.
Can an Oregon bank freeze a transaction if it suspects elder fraud?
It may, but it does not have to. Under ORS 708A.675 a bank that reasonably believes a vulnerable person is being financially exploited may refuse a transaction or withdrawal for up to 15 business days, and may extend that if it believes exploitation may continue.
Who do I call if an elderly person in Oregon is being scammed?
Call 855-503-SAFE (7233) to report that an older or vulnerable adult is being taken advantage of financially, or 911 if someone is in danger now. The federal DOJ Elder Fraud Hotline (833-372-8311) helps with fraud against anyone 60 or older.
Will the Oregon Department of Justice get my money back?
Do not count on it. The office offers voluntary mediation but says it cannot require a business to take part or take a specific action, and it cannot act as your lawyer. Contact your payment company for a reversal and keep your lawsuit deadlines in mind.
Does Oregon have a law on crypto ATMs?
Not that we found. As of October 2026, we found no Oregon law aimed specifically at crypto ATMs, and the Legislature's bill records show no crypto ATM or kiosk bill in the 2025 or 2026 sessions. If you were told to deposit cash into a crypto ATM, report it to the FBI's IC3 and the FTC right away.
What is the small claims limit in Oregon?
Under ORS 46.405(3), a claim of up to $10,000 may be filed in the small claims department.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 646: Trade Practices and Antitrust Regulation
§ 646.608Additional unlawful business, trade practices; proof; rulesIn force
(1) A person engages in an unlawful practice if in the course of the person’s business, vocation or occupation the person does any of the following: (a) Passes off real estate, goods or services as the real estate, goods or services of another. (b) Causes likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of real estate, goods or services. (c) Causes likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to affiliation, connection, or association with, or certification by, another. (d) Uses deceptive representations or designations of geographic origin in connection with real estate, goods or services. (e) Represents that real estate, goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, quantities or qualities that the real estate, goods or services do not have or that a person has a sponsorship, approval, status, qualification, affiliation, or connection that the person does not have. (f) Represents that real estate or goods are original or new if the real estate or goods are deteriorated, altered, reconditioned, reclaimed, used or secondhand.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
§ 646.605Definitions for ORS 336.184 and 646.605 to 646.652In forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in ORS 336.184 and 646.605 to 646.652: (1) “Appropriate court” means the circuit court of a county: (a) Where one or more of the defendants reside; (b) Where one or more of the defendants maintain a principal place of business; (c) Where one or more of the defendants are alleged to have committed an act prohibited by ORS 336.184 and 646.605 to 646.652; or (d) With the defendant’s consent, where the prosecuting attorney maintains an office. (2) “Documentary material” means the original or a copy of any book, record, report, memorandum, paper, communication, tabulation, map, chart, photograph, mechanical transcription, or other tangible document or recording, wherever situated. (3) “Examination” of documentary material includes inspection, study or copying of any documentary material, and taking testimony under oath or acknowledgment regarding any documentary material or copy thereof. (4) “Person” means natural persons, corporations, trusts, partnerships, incorporated or unincorporated associations and any other legal entity except bodies or officers acting under statutory authority of this state or the United States.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 160 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State Ex Rel. Redden v. Discount Fabrics, Inc. (Oregon Supreme Court 1980, 289 Or. 375)“…violations of Oregon's Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.605 et seq. The suit was tried in circuit c…”
- Chamberlain v. Jim Fisher Motors, Inc. (Oregon Supreme Court 1978, 282 Or. 229)“…improper because plaintiff's complaint seeks recovery under ORS 646.605 et seq., the Unlawful Trade Practices A…”
- State ex rel Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLC (Oregon Supreme Court 2023, 371 Or. 23)“…case arises under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.605 to 646.656.1 The UTPA sets out an exten…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify and Get a Refund
§ 646.553Registration of telephonic sellers; fee; Attorney General as attorney for service of process; rulesIn force
(1) A telephonic seller shall not conduct business in this state without having registered with the Department of Justice at least 10 days prior to the conduct of such business. A telephonic seller is required to register in the name under which the telephonic seller conducts business. Individual employees of the telephonic seller are not required to register. A telephonic seller is conducting business in this state if telephone solicitations of prospective purchasers are made from locations in this state or solicitation is made of prospective purchasers located in this state. (2) A registration shall be effective for one year from the date of filing with the Department of Justice. Each application for registration, or renewal thereof, shall be accompanied by a fee of $400. (3) The Department of Justice shall send to each registrant a certificate or other appropriate document demonstrating registration compliance, which shall be posted at the telephonic seller’s principal business location.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 124: Abuse Prevention and Reporting; Civil Action for Abuse
§ 124.100Definitions for ORS 124.100 to 124.140; action authorized; relief; qualifications for bringing action; notice to Attorney GeneralIn force
(1) As used in ORS 124.100 to 124.140: (a) “Elderly person” means a person 65 years of age or older. (b) “Financially incapable” has the meaning given that term in ORS 125.005. (c) “Incapacitated” has the meaning given that term in ORS 125.005. (d) “Person with a disability” means a person with a physical or mental impairment that: (A) Is likely to continue without substantial improvement for no fewer than 12 months or to result in death; and (B) Prevents performance of substantially all the ordinary duties of occupations in which an individual not having the physical or mental impairment is capable of engaging, having due regard to the training, experience and circumstances of the person with the physical or mental impairment. (e) “Vulnerable person” means: (A) An elderly person; (B) A financially incapable person; (C) An incapacitated person; or (D) A person with a disability who is susceptible to force, threat, duress, coercion, persuasion or physical or emotional injury because of the person’s physical or mental impairment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
§ 124.110Financial abuse subject to actionIn force
(1) An action may be brought under ORS 124.100 for financial abuse in the following circumstances: (a) When a person wrongfully takes or appropriates money or property of a vulnerable person, without regard to whether the person taking or appropriating the money or property has a fiduciary relationship with the vulnerable person. (b) When a vulnerable person requests that another person transfer to the vulnerable person any money or property that the other person holds or controls and that belongs to or is held in express trust, constructive trust or resulting trust for the vulnerable person, and the other person, without good cause, either continues to hold the money or property or fails to take reasonable steps to make the money or property readily available to the vulnerable person when: (A) The ownership or control of the money or property was acquired in whole or in part by the other person or someone acting in concert with the other person from the vulnerable person; and (B) The other person acts in bad faith, or knew or should have known of the right of the vulnerable person to have the money or property transferred as requested or otherwise made…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
§ 124.130Statute of limitationIn force
An action under ORS 124.100 to 124.140 must be commenced within seven years after discovery of the conduct described in ORS 124.105 and 124.110 that gives rise to a cause of action under ORS 124.100 to 124.140.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
§ 124.050Definitions for ORS 124.050 to 124.095In force
As used in ORS 124.050 to 124.095: (1) “Abuse” means one or more of the following: (a) Any physical injury to an elderly person caused by other than accidental means, or which appears to be at variance with the explanation given of the injury. (b) Neglect. (c) Abandonment, including desertion or willful forsaking of an elderly person or the withdrawal or neglect of duties and obligations owed an elderly person by a caretaker or other person. (d) Willful infliction of physical pain or injury upon an elderly person. (e) An act that constitutes a crime under ORS 163.375, 163.405, 163.411, 163.415, 163.425, 163.427, 163.465, 163.467 or 163.525. (f) Verbal abuse. (g) Financial exploitation. (h) Sexual abuse. (i) Involuntary seclusion of an elderly person for the convenience of a caregiver or to discipline the person. (j) A wrongful use of a physical or chemical restraint of an elderly person, excluding an act of restraint prescribed by a physician licensed under ORS chapter 677 and any treatment activities that are consistent with an approved treatment plan or in connection with a court order.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 708A: Regulation of Institutions Generally
§ 708A.675Authority of financial institutions in cases of suspected financial exploitation; notifications; limitation on liabilityIn force
(1) When a financial institution reasonably believes, or has received information from the Department of Human Services, a law enforcement agency, or a district attorney’s office demonstrating that it is reasonable to believe, that financial exploitation of a vulnerable person may have occurred, may have been attempted or is being attempted, and pending an investigation by the financial institution, the department, the law enforcement agency or the district attorney’s office, the financial institution may but is not required to: (a) Refuse a transaction with or involving the vulnerable person; (b) Refuse to permit the withdrawal or disbursement of funds contained in a vulnerable person’s account; (c) Prevent a change in ownership of a vulnerable person’s account; (d) Prevent a transfer of funds from a vulnerable person’s account to an account owned wholly or partially by another person; or (e) Refuse to comply with instructions given to the financial institution by an agent or attorney-in-fact under a power of attorney signed or purported to have been signed by the vulnerable person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 164: Offenses Against Property
§ 164.057Aggravated theft in the first degreeIn force
(1) A person commits the crime of aggravated theft in the first degree, if: (a) The person violates ORS 164.055 with respect to property, other than a motor vehicle used primarily for personal rather than commercial transportation; and (b) The value of the property in a single or aggregate transaction is $10,000 or more. (2) Aggravated theft in the first degree is a Class B felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
§ 164.061Sentence for aggravated theft in the first degree when victim 65 years of age or olderIn force
When a person is convicted of aggravated theft in the first degree under ORS 164.057, the court shall sentence the person to a term of incarceration ranging from 16 months to 45 months, depending on the person’s criminal history, if: (1) The victim of the theft was 65 years of age or older at the time of the commission of the offense; and (2) The value of the property stolen from the victim described in subsection (1) of this section, in a single or aggregate transaction, is $10,000 or more. [2008 c.14 §4] Note: 164.061 was enacted into law but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 164 or any series therein by law. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 163: Offenses Against Persons
§ 163.205Criminal mistreatment in the first degreeIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A person commits the crime of criminal mistreatment in the first degree if: (a) The person, in violation of a legal duty to provide care for another person, or having assumed the permanent or temporary care, custody or responsibility for the supervision of another person, intentionally or knowingly withholds necessary and adequate food, physical care or medical attention from that other person; or (b) The person, in violation of a legal duty to provide care for a dependent person or elderly person, or having assumed the permanent or temporary care, custody or responsibility for the supervision of a dependent person or elderly person, intentionally or knowingly: (A) Causes physical injury or injuries to the dependent person or elderly person; (B) Deserts the dependent person or elderly person in a place with the intent to abandon that person; (C) Leaves the dependent person or elderly person unattended at a place for such a period of time as may be likely to endanger the health or welfare of that person; (D) Hides the dependent person’s or elderly person’s money or property or takes the money or property for, or appropriates the money or property to, any…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 146 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Rodvelt (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2003, 187 Or. App. 128)“…ith the majority’s rejection of defendant’s arguments under ORS 163.205 and with its conclusion that the trial…”
- State v. Baker-Krofft (Oregon Supreme Court 2010, 348 Or. 655)“…ary and adequate * * * physical care” within the meaning of ORS 163.205 and ORS 163.200, two statutes that proh…”
- State v. Crosby (Oregon Supreme Court 2007, 342 Or. 419)“…causes the death of * * * a dependent person, as defined in ORS 163.205,[ 9 ] and: “(A) The…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon Expungement Laws: How to Set Aside a Conviction Under ORS 137.225
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- ORS 646.638, Civil action by private party (Unlawful Trade Practices Act)(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 124.100 to 124.130, Civil action for abuse of vulnerable persons(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 708A.675, Financial institution actions on suspected financial exploitation(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- Oregon Department of Justice, Consumer complaints(justice.oregon.gov).gov
- Oregon Department of Justice, Report scams and fraud (Consumer Hotline)(www.doj.state.or.us).gov
- Oregon Division of Financial Regulation, File a complaint(dfr.oregon.gov).gov
- Oregon Department of Human Services, Report abuse(www.oregon.gov).gov
- ORS 59.485 and 59.495, Securities professionals and suspected financial exploitation(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- Oregon Division of Financial Regulation, Suspected financial exploitation(dfr.oregon.gov).gov
- ORS 164.055, 164.057 and 164.061, Theft and aggravated theft(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- Oregon Laws 2026, chapter 14 (HB 4041), theft thresholds operative January 1, 2027(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 163.205, Criminal mistreatment in the first degree(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 9.280, Immigration consultants(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- Oregon Laws 2025, chapter 580 (HB 3865), calls and text messages(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 83.720, Home solicitation sales: right to cancel(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 46.405, Small claims department(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 12.110, Limitations: fraud or deceit(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov