Massachusetts
Massachusetts Identity Theft Laws: Penalties and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

This page covers identity theft and identity fraud law in Massachusetts under M.G.L. c.266, Section 37E, plus the state's credit-freeze, breach-notification, and consumer-protection statutes that apply once someone has misused your identifying information. It does not cover federal identity theft law in depth; for that layer, see our identity theft laws hub and our guide to reporting identity theft.
Massachusetts's Identity Fraud Statute
M.G.L. c.266, Section 37E, «Use of personal identification of another; identity fraud; penalty; restitution,» defines «personal identifying information» as any name or number usable, alone or with other information, to assume an individual's identity. The statute prohibits three overlapping categories of conduct, and each carries a mens rea element that the prosecution must prove. Subsection (b) reaches a person who, «with intent to defraud,» poses as another without that person's express authorization and uses their identifying information to obtain or attempt to obtain money, credit, goods, services, anything of value, an identification card or other evidence of identity, «or to harass another.» Subsection (c) reaches obtaining another person's identifying information without express authorization, again «with intent to defraud,» either intending to pose as that person or to assist someone else in posing, for those same purposes or to harass. Subsection (c1/2) reaches possessing a tool or instrument adapted, designed, or commonly used for accessing another person's account numbers, codes, passwords, or unique biometric data «under circumstances evincing an intent to use or knowledge that some person intends to use the same in the commission of larceny.»
Two elements matter when reading Section 37E against a real set of facts. Intent to defraud is an element of both (b) and (c), so unauthorized use of someone's information without that intent does not fit either subsection. And «harass» is a defined term rather than an everyday one: subsection (a) limits it to willfully and maliciously engaging in an act directed at a specific person that seriously alarms or annoys them and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress. Because harassment is listed as an alternative prohibited purpose, the statute reaches identity misuse aimed at tormenting someone, not only misuse aimed at financial gain.
Unlike many states, Massachusetts does not tier this penalty by the dollar value obtained or by repeat offense. All three prohibited categories carry the identical maximum penalty: a fine of not more than $5,000 or imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years, or both. Section 37E(e) separately authorizes a warrantless arrest on probable cause of a violation, giving police the ability to act immediately rather than waiting to obtain a warrant.
Your Right to a Police Report Within 24 Hours
Section 37E(f) gives Massachusetts identity fraud victims a specific, enforceable right that many states leave discretionary: a law enforcement officer must accept the victim's incident report and, if the victim requests it, provide a copy within 24 hours. The report can be filed in any of four qualifying counties: where the victim resides, where the identifying information was stored or used, where the responsible business operates, or where the underlying breach occurred. This flexibility matters in practice, since identity fraud frequently crosses county lines between where a victim lives and where the fraud was actually committed.

Restitution and the Consumer Protection Act
Restitution to an identity fraud victim in Massachusetts is mandatory, not left to the sentencing judge's discretion. Section 37E(d) states that a person found guilty «shall, in addition to any other punishment, be ordered to make restitution for financial loss sustained by a victim,» and the statute specifically lists the costs of correcting credit history, the costs of civil or administrative proceedings needed to satisfy wrongly incurred debts, liens, or judgments, lost wages, and attorney's fees.
Separately, Massachusetts's general Consumer Protection Act, c.93A Section 9, gives a private right of action for an «unfair or deceptive act or practice,» with a guaranteed minimum recovery of actual damages or $25, whichever is greater, 2 to 3 times damages for a willful or knowing violation, and mandatory attorney's fees and costs for a prevailing plaintiff. This is a real, verified statute, but its application to a given identity theft case is fact-dependent: c.93A reaches a business's unfair or deceptive data-handling conduct more directly than it reaches the fraudster's own conduct, which Section 37E's criminal and restitution track already addresses. When a business did deceive you directly, our guide to Massachusetts scam and fraud laws covers how a c.93A claim works, including the written demand that generally has to come first. Anyone considering a c.93A claim tied to identity theft should discuss the specific facts with a Massachusetts-licensed attorney rather than assume the statute automatically applies.
No Massachusetts-Specific Minor Credit Freeze Law
Massachusetts's general security-freeze statute, c.93 Section 62A, applies to «a consumer» with no age threshold and no separate provision for minors or other protected consumers. A full review of Chapter 93's table of contents found no adjacent minor or protected-consumer freeze section. That means Massachusetts residents, including parents trying to freeze a child's credit file before it is ever opened, rely entirely on the federal protected-consumer security freeze right created by 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-1(j) in 2018, not on any state-specific mechanism. For the practical steps involved in placing a freeze, see our guide to credit freeze vs. fraud alert.
Reporting Identity Theft in Massachusetts
Under Section 37E(f) above, local police in Massachusetts must accept your report and, on request, provide a copy within 24 hours. This page could not independently confirm current contact details, complaint procedures, or hotline information for the Massachusetts Attorney General's consumer protection resources, because every attempted fetch of mass.gov returned a 403 response during research. Rather than repeat unverified information, this page directs Massachusetts residents to the free federal process at IdentityTheft.gov, which does not depend on any state-specific resource, and recommends checking mass.gov directly for the state office's current identity theft page and contact information. See our guide to how to report identity theft for the full federal reporting process.

The Federal Layer
Regardless of state, identity theft is also a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. Section 1028. The Federal Trade Commission's free recovery site, IdentityTheft.gov, walks victims through reporting what happened, building a personal recovery plan, and, with an account, pre-filling the letters most victims need. Once you have an FTC Identity Theft Report, FCRA Section 605B, codified at 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-2, lets you get fraudulent information blocked from your credit report. Federal law has also required free credit freezes and free fraud alerts at all three credit bureaus since 2018. See our identity theft laws hub for the full federal picture, including the one-year versus seven-year fraud alert distinction.
When Free Breach Monitoring Runs Out
Place a credit freeze at Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion first; it is free. If a data breach disclosed or likely disclosed your Social Security number, Massachusetts law entitles you to free credit monitoring for 18 months, or 42 months if a consumer reporting agency was breached, so enroll in that before paying for anything. Once that period ends, or if you want broader alerts, Aura offers three-bureau credit monitoring, dark-web alerts for your Social Security number, and alerts for unusual spending on the accounts you link.
Explore Aura's FeaturesAffiliate disclosure: if you sign up through this link we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
2025-2026 Legislative Currency
A review of Massachusetts's 2025 Session Laws, covering Acts 1 through 101 as published on the legislature's session-laws page, found no amendment to c.266 Section 37E, c.93 Section 62A or 62B, or c.93H Section 3A. This coverage may not be exhaustive for the full 2025-2026 legislative session, so treat it as the most current information available rather than a guarantee that nothing has changed since.

Information last verified on 2026-08-13, drawn directly from M.G.L. c.266 Section 37E, c.93 Section 62A, c.93H Section 3A, and c.93A Section 9 on malegislature.gov. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
- Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
- How to Report Identity Theft
- Credit Freeze vs. Fraud Alert
Last updated: 2026-08-13.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is identity theft a felony in Massachusetts?
Massachusetts's identity fraud statute, M.G.L. c.266 Section 37E, sets a flat maximum penalty across its main provisions: a fine of not more than $5,000 or imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years, or both. The statute does not tier the penalty by dollar value or by repeat offense.
Does Massachusetts have a minor or child credit freeze law?
No. Massachusetts's general security-freeze statute, c.93 Section 62A, applies uniformly to all consumers with no age threshold or minor-specific provision. Massachusetts minors rely on the federal protected-consumer freeze right under 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-1(j), in effect since 2018.
How quickly must Massachusetts police give me a copy of my identity fraud report?
Within 24 hours of your request, under M.G.L. c.266 Section 37E(f). You can file the report in any county where you live, where the information was stored or used, where the responsible business operates, or where the breach occurred.
Can I get restitution if someone is convicted of identity fraud against me in Massachusetts?
Yes, and it is mandatory. Section 37E(d) requires a court to order a convicted defendant to pay restitution covering the victim's costs of correcting credit history, related legal proceedings, lost wages, and attorney's fees.
Can I sue the person who stole my identity in Massachusetts?
Massachusetts's Consumer Protection Act, c.93A Section 9, provides a private right of action for unfair or deceptive practices, but its application to identity theft is fact-dependent and generally reaches a business's data-handling conduct rather than the thief's own conduct directly. Discuss your specific situation with a Massachusetts-licensed attorney.
What free protection do I get if a company's data breach exposed my Social Security number?
Under M.G.L. c.93H Section 3A, you are entitled to free credit monitoring, 18 months from the breached entity or 42 months if a consumer reporting agency itself was breached, and the offer cannot be conditioned on waiving your legal rights.
Where do I report identity theft in Massachusetts?
Local police must accept your report and, on request, provide a copy within 24 hours under Section 37E(f). The federal site IdentityTheft.gov also provides a free, state-independent reporting and recovery process; check mass.gov directly for the Attorney General's current consumer-protection contact information.
Updates
Corrected the description of the Massachusetts identity fraud statute to include the 'with intent to defraud' element and the 'or to harass another' prohibited purpose that both subsection (b) and subsection (c) of M.G.L. c.266 Section 37E actually contain.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 266
§ 37EUse of personal identification of another; identity fraud; penalty; restitutionIn force
Section 37E. (a) For purposes of this section, the following words shall have the following meanings:— ''Harass'', willfully and maliciously engage in an act directed at a specific person or persons, which act seriously alarms or annoys such person or persons and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress. ''Personal identifying information'', any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to assume the identity of an individual, including any name, address, telephone number, driver's license number, social security number, place of employment, employee identification number, mother's maiden name, demand deposit account number, savings account number, credit card number or computer password identification. ''Pose'', to falsely represent oneself, directly or indirectly, as another person or persons. ''Victim'', any person who has suffered financial loss or any entity that provided money, credit, goods, services or anything of value and has suffered financial loss as a direct result of the commission or attempted commission of a violation of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 93H
§ 3ABreaches of security including social security numbers; offer of credit monitoring services requiredIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Section 3A. (a) If a person knows or has reason to know that said person experienced an incident that requires notice pursuant to section 3 and such breach of security includes a social security number, the person shall contract with a third party to offer to each resident whose social security number was disclosed in the breach of security or is reasonably believed to have been disclosed in the breach of security, credit monitoring services at no cost to said resident for a period of not less than 18 months; provided, however, that if the person that has experienced a breach of security is a consumer reporting agency, then said consumer reporting agency shall contract with a third party to offer each resident whose social security number was disclosed in the breach of security or is reasonably believed to have been disclosed in the breach of security, credit monitoring services at no cost to such resident for a period of not less than 42 months. Said contracts shall not include reciprocal agreements for services in lieu of payment or fees.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Also relied on in: Massachusetts Data Privacy Laws: Security Rules & Consumer Rights (2026), Massachusetts Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026)
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 93
§ 62AConsumer requested security freeze on consumer reportIn force
Section 62A. If a consumer requests a security freeze, the consumer reporting agency shall disclose to the consumer the process of placing, removing and lifting a security freeze. A consumer reporting agency shall require proper identification of the person making a request to place, lift or remove a security freeze. A consumer may request that a security freeze be placed on his consumer report by sending a request to a consumer reporting agency by certified mail, overnight mail or regular stamped mail to an address designated by the consumer reporting agency to receive such requests, or by a method otherwise permitted by regulation. If a security freeze is in place, the information from a consumer report shall not be released to a third party without prior express authorization from the consumer. This section shall not prohibit a consumer reporting agency from advising a third party that a security freeze is in effect with respect to the consumer report. A consumer reporting agency shall place a security freeze on a consumer report not later than 3 business days after receiving a request from the consumer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 93A
§ 9Civil actions and remedies; class action; demand for relief; damages; costs; exhausting administrative remediesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Section 9. (1) Any person, other than a person entitled to bring action under section eleven of this chapter, who has been injured by another person's use or employment of any method, act or practice declared to be unlawful by section two or any rule or regulation issued thereunder or any person whose rights are affected by another person violating the provisions of clause (9) of section three of chapter one hundred and seventy-six D;;;MI;;0000000; may bring an action in the superior court, or in the housing court as provided in section three of chapter one hundred and eighty-five C whether by way of original complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim or third party action, for damages and such equitable relief, including an injunction, as the court deems to be necessary and proper.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 1,043 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co. (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2008, 451 Mass. 623)“…d injury *625 or manifested defect a bar to recovery under G. L. c. 93A, § 9, in this case. Nevertheless, we conclud…”
- Linthicum v. Archambault (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1979, 379 Mass. 381)“…1977. The plaintiff then sent a demand letter pursuant to G. L. c. 93A, § 9 (3), to which the defendant made no wri…”
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc. (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1975, 366 Mass. 688)“…ntiff, through counsel, sent a demand letter complying with G. L. c. 93A, § 9, and that the defendant failed to respo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Massachusetts Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, How to Sue
United States Code Title 18
§ 1028Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and informationIn forcecited in 22 of our articles
Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this section— knowingly and without lawful authority produces an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document; knowingly transfers an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without lawful authority; knowingly possesses with intent to use unlawfully or transfer unlawfully five or more identification documents (other than those issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication features, or false identification documents; knowingly possesses an identification document (other than one issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication feature, or a false identification document, with the intent such document or feature be used to defraud the United States; knowingly produces, transfers, or possesses a document-making implement or authentication feature with the intent such document-making implement or authentication feature will be used in the production of a false identification document or another document-making implement or authentication feature which will…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,360 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Christensen (2016) affirmed Section 1028(a)(7) identity-theft convictions after the CFAA predicates were set aside, holding intent to violate California Penal Code 502 was a valid alternative predicate. United States v. Campa (2008) upheld a 1028(a)(3) conviction on constructive possession of counterfeit documents.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Flores-Figueroa v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2009, 556 U.S. 646)“…tion documents, authentica tion features, and information.” 18 U. S. C. §1028. The title of another provision (the pro…”
- United States v. George Lloyd Pregent (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 1999, 190 F.3d 279)“…zed United States identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1028 (a)(1) (West Supp.1999), knowingly prod…”
- United States v. Lesmarge Valnor (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2006, 451 F.3d 744)✓Valnor charged $400 to $500 a head to have a Florida DMV examiner issue fraudulent driver's licenses; the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a sentence above the advisory range for his Section 1028(f) conspiracy, noting it fell far below Section 1028(b)(1)(A)'s 15-year maximum.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties, Indiana Identity Theft Laws, Phishing, Smishing and Vishing: Spot Them and What to Do If You Clicked
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- M.G.L. c.266, Section 37E, Use of Personal Identification of Another; Identity Fraud(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c.93, Section 62A, Security Freezes on Consumer Reports(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c.93H, Section 3A, Notice of Security Breach; Free Credit Monitoring(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c.93A, Section 9, Consumer Protection Act Private Right of Action(malegislature.gov).gov
- Massachusetts Session Laws, Acts of 2025(malegislature.gov).gov
- IdentityTheft.gov (Federal Trade Commission)(identitytheft.gov).gov
- Know Your Rights (IdentityTheft.gov / FTC)(identitytheft.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. Section 1028, Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Identification Documents (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-2, Block of Information Resulting From Identity Theft (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)