Illinois
Illinois Debt Collection Laws: The 15% Wage Cap, 2026 Exemption Increases, and Debt Deadlines
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

No creditor in Illinois can start taking money out of your paycheck simply because a bill is unpaid. Outside of support orders, tax debts, and federally administered student loan garnishment, a creditor must first sue you, win a judgment, and then obtain a wage deduction order from the court before any garnishment can begin. Most garnishments follow a default judgment entered because the person being sued never answered the lawsuit, which makes answering the summons the single most valuable step available to an Illinois debtor. Illinois is also one of the states that protects more of a paycheck than federal law requires, which is worth knowing before you assume the worst.
How Wage Garnishment Works in Illinois
Illinois's wage-deduction-order cap lives in 735 ILCS 5/12-803, and it is more protective than the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act floor most states rely on. A judgment creditor can take no more than the lesser of 15% of gross weekly wages, or the amount by which disposable earnings for the week exceed 45 times the greater of the federal minimum hourly wage or Illinois's own minimum wage. Our wage garnishment calculator applies that 15%/45x Illinois formula directly to your own pay period and gross wages. Illinois's minimum wage has climbed well above the $7.25 federal rate over the past several years and, under 820 ILCS 105/4, reached $15.00 an hour on and after January 1, 2025, with no further increase scheduled since. At that rate, 45 times the minimum wage works out to $675 a week fully protected, far above the $326.25 floor the federal-minimum-wage version of the formula would produce.
The formula's federal alternative matters because of a drafting quirk that confuses a lot of readers. Section 12-805 requires that every garnishment summons come with a notice to the debtor, and that notice recites both standards: Illinois's 15%/45x rule and the federal 25%/30x rule, so the debtor can see the comparison. The federal language in that notice is informational, not operative. Federal law lets a state set a more protective cap than federal law requires, and that is exactly what Illinois did; the 15%/45x figure is the one that controls an Illinois wage deduction order.
A separate, voluntary instrument runs alongside it. Under the Illinois Wage Assignment Act, 740 ILCS 170/4, an employee can sign a wage assignment rather than being garnished by a judgment. It uses the same 15%/45x cap, but it has its own formalities: the assignment must be a written instrument, signed by the wage earner in person, dated, and it must state the Social Security number, the employer's name, the amount of consideration, any interest rate, and due dates. Pension and retirement benefits cannot be assigned, and the employer may deduct a $12 fee per assignment from what the employee owes.
Illinois Has No Head-of-Household Exemption, and Firing Protection Matches Federal Law
Illinois does not carve out a separate exemption for a head of household the way some states do; the 15%/45x cap plus the general personal-property exemptions described below is the full protection. Firing protection also stays at the federal floor: 735 ILCS 5/12-818 bars an employer from discharging or suspending an employee because of a deduction order for any one indebtedness, a Class A misdemeanor if violated, but it does not extend protection to a second, unrelated garnishment the way Iowa's or Kansas's statutes do.

State tax debt gets no special break in Illinois either. The Illinois Income Tax Act, 35 ILCS 5/1109, does not set its own wage-levy percentage; it expressly incorporates 12-803, so the Illinois Department of Revenue's wage levy is capped at the same 15%/45x formula as any other judgment creditor's. Illinois enacted medical-debt protections aimed at credit reporting in 2024 and appropriated state money toward a medical-debt forgiveness fund, but neither of those changes the garnishment percentage; ordinary medical debt collected through a wage deduction order is subject to the same 12-803 cap as any other consumer judgment.
Bank Accounts and the 2026 Exemption Increases
Illinois protects a debtor's equity in most other property through a $4,000 wildcard exemption under 735 ILCS 5/12-1001(b), of which $1,000 is described in the statute as an automatic exemption. That figure was unchanged by the 2026 reform described below, and it must still be claimed by the debtor in the collection proceeding; it is not self-executing. Importantly, 12-1001 explicitly does not apply to wages, so this wildcard cannot be used to shield paychecks that are already subject to a Part 8 wage-deduction proceeding.
A broader package of increases took effect January 1, 2026 under legislation reported as the most significant change to Illinois's exemption statutes in over a decade: the homestead exemption rose from $15,000 to $50,000 for a single owner and from $30,000 to $100,000 for joint owners under 12-901; the motor vehicle exemption rose from $2,400 to $3,600; and the tools-of-the-trade exemption rose from $1,500 to $2,250. A jewelry exemption of $5,000 is also reflected in the current statute text. None of these figures apply automatically; a debtor asserts them in the collection or bankruptcy proceeding where they are needed.
How Long Creditors Have to Sue: Illinois's Statute of Limitations
Illinois splits its debt deadlines by whether the obligation is written. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-206, actions on bonds, promissory notes, written leases, written contracts, or other written evidences of indebtedness must be brought within 10 years of accrual; a demand note dated on or after January 1, 1998 gets 10 years from the date demand is made, or 10 years of total non-payment and non-demand, whichever comes first. Under 13-205, actions on unwritten contracts and civil actions not otherwise provided for must be brought within 5 years.
Illinois made a deliberate, non-uniform choice for negotiable promissory notes: rather than adopt the Uniform Commercial Code's usual 6-year note limitations period, Illinois left the relevant subsections of 810 ILCS 5/3-118 blank, so ordinary promissory notes stay under the general 10-year written-instrument period in 13-206 instead of a shorter UCC track.
Credit card debt is where the written/unwritten split matters most in practice. In Portfolio Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Feltman (2009), an Illinois appellate court applied the 5-year unwritten-contract period to a card claim because the collector could not show the full terms of the agreement in one writing. Five years is the usual outcome for card debt, but the decision turned on the record in that case, and a collector that proves a complete written contract may be able to claim the 10-year period.
On the written-contract track, 13-206 itself requires that any payment or new promise be made in writing to restart the 10-year clock; each restart opens a fresh 10-year window from the date of that written payment or promise. Separately, Illinois's 2020 Consumer Fairness Act reform, paired with 735 ILCS 5/2-1602, created a narrower revival rule specifically for consumer-debt judgments: a consumer-debt judgment entered from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2025 can be revived only by a petition filed no later than 10 years after entry, a tighter window than the roughly 20-year outer limit that applies to non-consumer judgments under 13-218. A later amendment (P.A. 104-120) goes further for consumer-debt judgments entered on or after January 1, 2026: they cannot be revived at all, but stay enforceable for 15 years. That is a judgment-revival period, a different concept from the statute of limitations on filing suit in the first place, and it is worth not conflating the two. For deadlines on other kinds of Illinois claims, see the Illinois statute of limitations guide.
Rules Debt Collectors Must Follow
Third-party collectors working Illinois debts are bound by the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: no harassment, no false statements about what they can legally do, no contact at unreasonable hours, and validation information on first contact. Under Regulation F, 12 CFR 1006.26, a debt collector must not sue or threaten to sue on a time-barred debt at all, though asking you to pay voluntarily remains legal. That is exactly why a payment made without checking the dates is risky on Illinois's written-contract track, where a signed writing is what restarts the clock.

Car Repossession in Illinois
Illinois enacted the standard UCC self-help rule at 810 ILCS 5/9-609: after default, a secured lender may take possession of the collateral without going to court, as long as it can do so without a breach of the peace, or through the courts if it cannot. What counts as a breach of the peace is left to Illinois case law rather than defined in the statute.
Illinois adds a real cure right for financed vehicles, though it is conditional. Under the Illinois Vehicle Code, 625 ILCS 5/3-114(f-7), if a debtor had paid at least 30% of the deferred payment price, including any down payment or trade-in, at the time of repossession, the holder must send written notice within 3 business days after repossession giving 21 days to redeem or reinstate the contract by paying the overdue amount, late charges, and repossession and storage costs. That right can be used only once per contract. Below the 30% threshold, no statutory cure notice is required. The Motor Vehicle Retail Installment Sales Act, 815 ILCS 375/20, is the related provision that sends a repossessing holder to Article 9 of the UCC and to the Vehicle Code's title-transfer requirements; it does not itself contain the 30%/3-day/21-day mechanic, which lives in the Vehicle Code section above.
Illinois also regulates who is allowed to do the repossessing. The Collateral Recovery Act, 225 ILCS 422, requires the Illinois Commerce Commission to license repossession agencies and the individual agents and branch offices that work for them, with insurance and bonding requirements attached to the agency license. Operating without the required license or permit is a Class A misdemeanor. If a repossession feels aggressive or improperly handled, asking whether the agent and agency are licensed is a reasonable first question.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Illinois
Start with the paperwork. If you were served with a lawsuit, answer it before the deadline even with a simple denial, because a default judgment forfeits every defense, including an expired statute of limitations, and it opens the door to a wage deduction order. If a garnishment has already started, check the math against the 15%/45x formula rather than the federal figures recited in the notice, since Illinois's own standard is more protective. If the debt is old, do not sign anything or make a payment without first checking the dates, because a written acknowledgment can restart the 10-year clock on a written-contract debt. When judgments and garnishments have stacked up faster than a budget can absorb, bankruptcy's automatic stay halts wage deduction orders immediately, and a structured guide to stopping wage garnishment walks through the options in order.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Car Repossession Laws
- Illinois Statute of Limitations
- Illinois Bankruptcy Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Illinois Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of my paycheck can be garnished in Illinois?
The lesser of 15% of your gross weekly wages or the amount by which your disposable earnings exceed 45 times the greater of the federal or Illinois minimum wage, under 735 ILCS 5/12-803. That is tighter than the 25%/30x federal floor, and it is the Illinois figure that controls, not the federal figure also printed on the garnishment notice.
Did Illinois change its exemption amounts in 2026?
Yes. Effective January 1, 2026, the homestead exemption rose to $50,000 for a single owner and $100,000 for joint owners, the motor vehicle exemption rose to $3,600, and the tools-of-the-trade exemption rose to $2,250. The general $4,000 wildcard exemption was not changed, and none of these figures reach wages already in a garnishment proceeding.
How long can a collector sue over a credit card debt in Illinois?
Usually five years. In Portfolio Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Feltman (2009), an Illinois appellate court applied the 5-year unwritten-contract period in 735 ILCS 5/13-205 to a card claim because the collector could not show the full terms in one writing. A collector that proves a complete written contract could claim the 10-year period in 13-206, so do not assume a card debt is time-barred at 5 years.
Does making a payment restart the clock on old debt in Illinois?
On the written-contract track, only a payment or promise made in writing restarts the 10-year period under 13-206. Illinois also has a separate, narrower rule limiting how long a consumer-debt court judgment itself can be revived, which is a different question from the original statute of limitations.
Does Illinois require notice before repossessing a car?
Only if you had paid at least 30% of the total price at the time of repossession. In that case, the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/3-114(f-7)) requires written notice within 3 business days of repossession giving 21 days to redeem or reinstate. Below that threshold, no statutory notice is required, and self-help repossession without breach of the peace is otherwise allowed.
Can I be fired for having my wages garnished in Illinois?
Not for a single debt. Section 12-818 makes it a Class A misdemeanor for an employer to discharge an employee over a deduction order for any one indebtedness, matching the federal one-debt protection. Illinois does not extend that protection to a second, separate garnishment.
Updates
Updated the statute of limitations and debt-revival details to match a primary-source review of every state (October 2026).
Corrected the effective date of Illinois's $15.00 minimum wage from January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2025, and cited 820 ILCS 105/4 directly; the protected-wage math is unchanged.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 735, Act 5 (Code of Civil Procedure)
§ 12-803Wages subject to collectionIn force
The wages, salary, commissions and bonuses subject to collection under a deduction order, for any work week shall be the lesser of (1) 15% of such gross amount paid for that week or (2) the amount by which disposable earnings for a week exceed 45 times the Federal Minimum Hourly Wage prescribed by Section 206(a)(1) of Title 29 of the United States Code, as amended, or, under a wage deduction summons served on or after January 1, 2006, the minimum hourly wage prescribed by Section 4 of the Minimum Wage Law, whichever is greater, in effect at the time the amounts are payable. This provision (and no other) applies irrespective of the place where the compensation was earned or payable and the State where the employee resides. No amounts required by law to be withheld may be taken from the amount collected by the creditor. The term "disposable earnings" means that part of the earnings of any individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of any amounts required by law to be withheld.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Illinois courts have construed section 12-803's 15% cap. California-Peterson Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Friedman (2000) held an independent contractor's compensation for services is wages, leaving 85% exempt; SMS Financial CH, LLC v. Feurer (2025) held the cap reaches wages an employer still owes, not wages already paid out.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- California-Peterson Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Friedman (Appellate Court of Illinois 2000)“…ction pursuant to section 12-803 of the Wage Deduction Act (735 ILCS 5/12-803 (West 1998)). Plaintiff obtained a…”
- People v. Davis (Appellate Court of Illinois 2001)“…ount authorized under the civil wage deduction remedy. See 735 ILCS 5/12-803 (West 1998) (setting the maximum wage s…”
- People v. Smith (Appellate Court of Illinois 2018, 2018 IL App (1st) 151402)“…t under section 12-803 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/12-803 (West 2016)). There is a split of autho…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-805Summons; IssuanceIn force
(a) Upon the filing by a judgment creditor, its attorney or other designee of (1) an affidavit that the affiant believes any person is indebted to the judgment debtor for wages due or to become due, as provided in Part 8 of Article XII of this Act, and includes the last address of the judgment debtor known to the affiant as well as the name of the judgment debtor, and a certification by the judgment creditor or his attorney that, before filing the affidavit, the wage deduction notice has been mailed to the judgment debtor by first class mail at the judgment debtor's last known address, and (2) written interrogatories to be answered by the employer with respect to the indebtedness, the clerk of the court in which the judgment was entered shall issue summons against the person named in the affidavit as employer commanding the employer to appear in the court and answer the interrogatories in writing under oath. The interrogatories shall elicit all the information necessary to determine the proper amount of non-exempt wages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jefferson Capital Sytems, LLC v. Garrett (Appellate Court of Illinois 2021, 2021 IL App (3d) 200011-U)“…for the issuance of a summons against the employer. 735 ILCS 5/12-805 (West 2018). Section 12-805 prescribes…”
- Johnson v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 2015, 114 F. Supp. 3d 596)“…ion of a garnishment proceeding against his employer. See 735 ILCS 5/12-805; Ga. Code. Ann. § 18-4-64; Ohio R.C. §…”
- Jackson v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C. (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2016, 833 F.3d 860)“…er, not the debtor, and must be served upon the employer. 735 ILCS 5/12-805(a). A judgment debtor is only entitled…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-1001Personal property exemptIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
The following personal property, owned by the debtor, is exempt from judgment, attachment, or distress for rent: (a) All household goods, including but not limited to, the debtor's and the debtor's dependents' food, eating and cooking utensils, bedding, furniture, books, refrigerator, stove, microwave oven, kitchen appliances, necessary provisions, washing machine, clothes dryer, vacuum cleaner, yard equipment and household equipment and tools, all personal possessions, including, but not limited to, clothing, pets, personal health aids, medications, computers or similar electronic devices and telephones, except that a creditor may obtain court permission to levy on any item of furniture, appliance, electronic device, yard equipment, precious item, utensils, set of utensils, or any other item exempt under this subsection that has a resale value of more than $5,000 unless that item is exempt under another provision of this Section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 132 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kauffman v. Wrenn (Appellate Court of Illinois 2016, 2015 IL App (2d) 150285)“…tion 12-1001(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/12-1001(g) (West 2014)). ¶2…”
- In re Marriage of Eberhardt (Appellate Court of Illinois 2008)“…ire $3,000 was exempt under section 12-1001(b) of the Code (735 ILCS 5/12-1001(b) (West 2006)) (personal property own…”
- Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc. (Appellate Court of Illinois 2006)“…personal property is exempt from judgment, as support. 735 ILCS 5/12-1001 (West 2002). Conversely, Dowling ar…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Illinois (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 13-206Ten year limitationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Except as provided in Section 2-725 of the "Uniform Commercial Code", actions on bonds, promissory notes, bills of exchange, written leases, written contracts, or other evidences of indebtedness in writing and actions brought under the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act shall be commenced within 10 years next after the cause of action accrued; but if any payment or new promise to pay has been made, in writing, on any bond, note, bill, lease, contract, or other written evidence of indebtedness, within or after the period of 10 years, then an action may be commenced thereon at any time within 10 years after the time of such payment or promise to pay. For purposes of this Section, with regard to promissory notes dated on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act of 1997, a cause of action on a promissory note payable at a definite date accrues on the due date or date stated in the promissory note or the date upon which the promissory note is accelerated.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 167 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Armstrong v. Guigler (Illinois Supreme Court 1996, 174 Ill. 2d 281)“…r statute of limitations for actions on a written contract (735 ILCS 5/13-206 (West 1992)), or the five-year statute…”
- Newell v. Newell (Appellate Court of Illinois 2011)“…years next after the cause of action accrued." 735 ILCS 5/13-206 (West 2006). Section 13-206 is a gener…”
- United General Title Insurance Co. v. Amerititle, Inc. (Appellate Court of Illinois 2006, 365 Ill. App. 3d 142)“…written contracts set forth in Section 13-206 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/13-206 (2004)) apply? 2. In an ac…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 13-205Five year limitationIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
Except as provided in Section 2-725 of the "Uniform Commercial Code", approved July 31, 1961, as amended, and Section 11-13 of "The Illinois Public Aid Code", approved April 11, 1967, as amended, actions on unwritten contracts, expressed or implied, or on awards of arbitration, or to recover damages for an injury done to property, real or personal, or to recover the possession of personal property or damages for the detention or conversion thereof, and all civil actions not otherwise provided for, shall be commenced within 5 years next after the cause of action accrued.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 400 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du Page (Illinois Supreme Court 2001, 195 Ill. 2d 257)“…n period on "all civil actions not otherwise provided for." 735 ILCS 5/13-205 (West 1996). The county argued that the…”
- Richter v. Prairie Farms Dairy (Illinois Supreme Court 2016, 2016 IL 119518)“…vely, that the five-year statute of limitations (see 735 ILCS 5/13-205 (West 2012)) barred plaintiffs’ claims…”
- Armstrong v. Guigler (Illinois Supreme Court 1996, 174 Ill. 2d 281)“…tations for "all civil actions not otherwise provided for" (735 ILCS 5/13-205 (West 1992)), applies to a cause of act…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, BIPA Explained: Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14), BIPA Statute of Limitations: The 5-Year Deadline (2026)
§ 12-818Discharge or suspension of employee prohibitedIn force
No employer may discharge or suspend any employee by reason of the fact that his or her earnings have been subjected to a deduction order for any one indebtedness. Any person violating this Section shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1996
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Carter Coal Co. v. Human Rights Commission (Appellate Court of Illinois 1994, 261 Ill. App. 3d 1)“…eason or another. See, e.g., 740 ILCS 170/10 (West 1992), 735 ILCS 5/12-818 (West 1992) (providing that an employee…”
- Insure One Independent Insurance Agency v. Koestner (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1996, 198 B.R. 709)“…because he was subject to a wage deduction, in violation of 735 ILCS 5/12-818. Judge Thomas held a bench trial on May…”
- Dornik v. Maurice (In Re Maurice) (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois 1994, 167 B.R. 136)“…deduction order for any one indebtedness. See 735 ILCS 5/12-818. Dornik, on the other hand, will…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2-1602Revival of judgmentIn force
(a) Except as provided in subsections (a-5) and (a-10), a judgment may be revived by filing a petition to revive the judgment in the seventh year after its entry, or in the seventh year after its last revival, or in the twentieth year after its entry, or at any other time within 20 years after its entry if the judgment becomes dormant and by serving the petition and entering a court order for revival as provided in the following subsections. The provisions of this amendatory Act of the 96th General Assembly are declarative of existing law. (a-5) As used in this Section: (1) "Consumer debt" means money or property, or the equivalent, due or owing, or alleged to be due or owing, from a natural person by reason of a transaction in which property, services, or money is acquired by that natural person for personal, family, or household purposes. (2) "Consumer debt judgment" means a judgment recovered in any court against one or more natural persons arising out of a consumer debt.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 39 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Panos Trading LLC v. Forrer (Appellate Court of Illinois 2023, 467 Ill. Dec. 170)“…ering a court order for revival as provided in the statute. 735 ILCS 5/2-1602(a) (West 2018). ¶ 34 In the inst…”
- Burman v. Snyder (Appellate Court of Illinois 2014, 2014 IL App (1st) 130772)“…n 2-1602(a) of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2-1602(a) (West 2012)), and that the trial cou…”
- Schindler v. Watson (Appellate Court of Illinois 2017, 2017 IL App (2d) 160126)“…20 years after its entry if the judgment becomes dormant.” 735 ILCS 5/2-1602(a) (West 2014). Finally, section…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 810, Act 5 (Uniform Commercial Code)
§ 9-609Secured party's right to take possession after defaultIn force
(a) Possession; rendering equipment unusable; disposition on debtor's premises. After default, a secured party: (1) may take possession of the collateral; and (2) without removal, may render equipment unusable and dispose of collateral on a debtor's premises under Section 9-610. (b) Judicial and nonjudicial process. A secured party may proceed under subsection (a): (1) pursuant to judicial process; or (2) without judicial process, if it proceeds without breach of the peace. (c) Assembly of collateral. If so agreed, and in any event after default, a secured party may require the debtor to assemble the collateral and make it available to the secured party at a place to be designated by the secured party which is reasonably convenient to both parties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jackson v. City of Chicago (Appellate Court of Illinois 2012, 2012 IL App (1st) 111044)“…14- Transactions (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/9-609(a)(1), (b)(1), (b)(2) (West 2008)), aft…”
- Murray v. Poani (Appellate Court of Illinois 2012, 980 N.E.2d 1275)“…on 9-609(b)(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/9-609(b)(2) (West 2008)) resulted, making the…”
- First American Bank v. Poplar Creek, LLC (Appellate Court of Illinois 2024, 258 N.E.3d 857)“…possession of the collateral.” (Emphasis added.) 810 ILCS 5/9-609(a)(1) (West 2022). Further,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 3-118Statute of limitationsIn force
(a) (Blank). (b) (Blank). (c) Except as provided in subsection (d), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to an unaccepted draft to pay the draft must be commenced within 3 years after dishonor of the draft or 10 years after the date of the draft, whichever period expires first. (d) An action to enforce the obligation of the acceptor of a certified check or the issuer of a teller's check, cashier's check, or traveler's check must be commenced within 3 years after demand for payment is made to the acceptor or issuer, as the case may be. (e) An action to enforce the obligation of a party to a certificate of deposit to pay the instrument must be commenced within 6 years after demand for payment is made to the maker, but if the instrument states a due date and the maker is not required to pay before that date, the 6-year period begins when a demand for payment is in effect and the due date has passed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Newell v. Newell (Appellate Court of Illinois 2011)“…App.3d at 1075 , 222 Ill.Dec. 710 , 678 N.E.2d 322 ; 810 ILCS 5/3-118(g) (West 2006). We decline to follow…”
- BMO Bank N.A. v. Zbroszczyk (Appellate Court of Illinois 2025, 2025 IL App (1st) 241333)“…tute of limitations for negotiable promissory notes. 810 ILCS 5/3-118 (West 1996). The legislature subsequent…”
- Kranzler v. Saltzman (Appellate Court of Illinois 2011)“…red under any of three applicable statutes of limitations (810 ILCS 5/3-118(g) (West 2008), 735 ILCS 5/13-205, 13-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 625, Act 5 (Illinois Vehicle Code)
§ 3-114Transfer by operation of lawIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) If the interest of an owner in a vehicle passes to another other than by voluntary transfer, the transferee shall, except as provided in paragraph (b), promptly mail or deliver within 20 days to the Secretary of State the last certificate of title, if available, proof of the transfer, and his application for a new certificate in the form the Secretary of State prescribes. It shall be unlawful for any person having possession of a certificate of title for a motor vehicle, semi-trailer, or house car by reason of his having a lien or encumbrance on such vehicle, to fail or refuse to deliver such certificate to the owner, upon the satisfaction or discharge of the lien or encumbrance, indicated upon such certificate of title. (b) If the interest of an owner in a vehicle passes to another under the provisions of the Small Estates provisions of the Probate Act of 1975 the transferee shall promptly mail or deliver to the Secretary of State, within 120 days, the last certificate of title, if available, the documentation required under the provisions of the Probate Act of 1975, and an application for certificate of title.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Cartwright (Appellate Court of Illinois 2025, 2025 IL App (5th) 240636-U)“…3-114(f-5)(2) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Vehicle Code) (625 ILCS 5/3-114(f-5)(2) (West 2022)), in that Credit A…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Small Estate Affidavit: $150,000 Limit, Rules and Form
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Debt Collection Laws by State: Garnishment, SOL, and Repossession Rules, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Alaska Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 35, Act 5 (Illinois Income Tax Act)
§ 1109Demand and SeizureIn force
In addition to any other remedy provided for by the laws of this State, if the tax imposed by this Act is not paid within the time required by this Act, the Department, or some person designated by it, may cause a demand to be made on the taxpayer for the payment thereof. If such tax remains unpaid for 10 days after such demand has been made and no proceedings have been taken to review the same, the Department may issue a warrant directed to any sheriff or other person authorized to serve process, commanding the sheriff or other person to levy upon the property and rights to property (whether real or personal, tangible or intangible) of the taxpayer, without exemption, found within his jurisdiction, for the payment of the amount thereof with the added penalties, interest and the cost of executing the warrant. The term "levy" includes the power of distraint and seizure by any means. In any case in which the warrant to levy has been issued, the sheriff or other person to whom the warrant was directed may seize and sell such property or rights to property.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2005
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Clifford (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois 1995, 182 B.R. 229)“…has a statutory hen on a portion of those funds pursuant to 35 ILCS 5/1109, in the amount of $21,399.67.…”
- John C. Bleavins v. Joel H. Bartels, Roger Bay, Vernon McGregor (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2005, 422 F.3d 445)“…gan the process of administrative seizure. See 35 ILCS 5/1109. In preparation, IDOR employee Roger Bay…”
- Illinois Department of Revenue v. Valentino's Restoration & Cleaning Service (In Re Valentino's Restoration & Cleaning Service) (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois 1997, 215 B.R. 153)“…the Illinois Income Tax Act, entitled “Demand and Seizure.” 35 ILCS 5/1109 (1996). It allows for a series of levie…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- 735 ILCS 5/12-803, Maximum Deductions from Wages(ilga.gov).gov
- 735 ILCS 5/12-805, Notice to Debtor(ilga.gov).gov
- 735 ILCS 5/12-1001, Personal Property Exempt from Judgment(ilga.gov).gov
- 735 ILCS 5/13-206, Written Contracts, Bonds, Notes(ilga.gov).gov
- 810 ILCS 5/9-609, Illinois UCC Secured Party's Right to Take Possession After Default(ilga.gov).gov
- 625 ILCS 5/3-114(f-7), Illinois Vehicle Code, 30% Payment / 3-Day Notice / 21-Day Reinstatement Rule(ilga.gov).gov
- 740 ILCS 170/4, Illinois Wage Assignment Act(ilga.gov).gov
- 12 CFR 1006.26, Collection of Time-Barred Debts (Regulation F)(ecfr.gov).gov
- 820 ILCS 105/4, Illinois Minimum Wage Law, Minimum Wage Rate Schedule(ilga.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.