Alaska
How Long Is a Life Sentence in Alaska? (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Alaska, no sentence is formally labeled a life sentence; a person convicted of first-degree murder receives a definite term of 30 to 99 years under AS 12.55.125(a), and certain first-degree murders carry a mandatory 99-year term. Within the 30-to-99-year range, discretionary parole eligibility comes only after serving two-thirds of the court-imposed term: an earliest possible date of roughly 20 years at the 30-year statutory floor, though the board may deny release. A person serving a mandatory 99-year term is not eligible for discretionary parole at all and may apply only once for a sentence modification after serving half the term.
This article was last reviewed and updated on March 17, 2026. All statutes, case law, and sentencing data have been verified against current Alaska government sources.
Alaska takes an unusual approach to life imprisonment. Its sentencing code has no sentence formally labeled "life" or "life without parole"; courts impose definite terms of years instead. That does not mean every long sentence carries a parole date. A person serving a mandatory 99-year term for first-degree murder under AS 12.55.125(a), or a 99-year definite term as a repeat most-serious-felony offender under AS 12.55.125(l), is not eligible for discretionary parole under AS 33.16.090(a)(1)(A). The only relief is a single application for modification or reduction of the sentence after serving half the term, under AS 12.55.125(j).
This distinction reflects a sentencing philosophy rooted in Alaska's territorial history and its consistent emphasis on rehabilitation over permanent incapacitation. Combined with the absence of the death penalty, which Alaska eliminated before it even became a state, the result is one of the most distinctive criminal sentencing frameworks in the country.
For a broader look at how all 50 states handle life sentences, see our complete state-by-state guide to life sentences.
Alaska Life Sentence Statutes
Alaska's criminal code defines murder and its penalties under Title 11 of the Alaska Statutes.

First-Degree Murder (AS 11.41.100): A person commits murder in the first degree if, with intent to cause the death of another person, they cause the death of any person, or if a death results from certain other enumerated conduct, such as a sexual offense against or kidnapping of a child under 16. First-degree murder is an unclassified felony carrying a definite sentence of 30 to 99 years under AS 12.55.125(a), with a mandatory 99-year term for enumerated aggravators (such as a victim who was a peace officer, firefighter, or correctional employee on duty, or a defendant with a prior murder conviction). A person serving that mandatory 99-year term is not eligible for discretionary parole.
Second-Degree Murder (AS 11.41.110): A person commits murder in the second degree if, intending to cause serious physical injury or knowing the conduct is substantially certain to cause death or serious physical injury, they cause a death; if they knowingly engage in conduct that results in death under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life; or if a death results during certain felonies, such as robbery, kidnapping, or first-degree arson. Second-degree murder is also an unclassified felony. Under AS 12.55.125(b) it carries a definite term of 15 to 99 years (not a presumptive range), with a 20-year minimum when the victim was a child under 16 and the defendant was a parent or person in a position of authority, or caused the death by committing a crime against a person.
Manslaughter (AS 11.41.120): A Class A felony carrying a maximum of 20 years under AS 12.55.125(c). For a first felony conviction in which the defendant caused the death, the presumptive range is 7 to 11 years; it is 10 to 14 years for a second felony conviction and 15 to 20 years for a third. A defendant previously convicted of two or more most serious felonies instead must receive a definite 99-year term under AS 12.55.125(l). Our guide to Alaska manslaughter laws covers the offense in depth, along with criminally negligent homicide and how fatal crashes are charged.
Unlike most states, Alaska does not use an "indeterminate life sentence" label. Instead, the court imposes a definite term of years, up to 99 years, which functions as the state's equivalent of a life sentence. Every sentence has a finite number, but a finite number does not guarantee a parole date: a mandatory 99-year term under AS 12.55.125(a) carries no discretionary parole eligibility, and a court may also order a defendant ineligible for discretionary parole under AS 12.55.115.
Aggravating Factors
Under AS 12.55.155, the court may impose a sentence above the presumptive range if aggravating factors are proven. These include:
- The defendant's prior criminal history, including prior felony convictions
- The crime involved multiple victims
- The victim was particularly vulnerable (elderly, disabled, or a child)
- The offense involved domestic violence
- The defendant occupied a position of trust or authority over the victim
- The crime was motivated by the victim's race, sex, religion, or other protected characteristic
Aggravating factors can push a murder sentence to the maximum 99-year term. A 99-year term imposed within the 30-to-99-year range remains parole-eligible after two-thirds is served, but a mandatory 99-year term under AS 12.55.125(a) does not.
Parole Eligibility
For first-degree murder in Alaska, discretionary parole eligibility requires serving two-thirds of the court-imposed sentence (or any minimum term set under AS 12.55.115, whichever is greater) under AS 33.16.090, not one-third. Because the statutory minimum sentence for first-degree murder is 30 years, the earliest possible parole-eligibility date is roughly 20 years, but that floor only applies if a court imposes the 30-year minimum; aggravating factors that lengthen the sentence push the real eligibility date substantially later. A mandatory 99-year term removes discretionary parole eligibility entirely (AS 33.16.090(a)(1)(A)), leaving only one application for sentence modification after serving half the term, without credit for good time (AS 12.55.125(j)). A murder conviction is also categorically ineligible for mandatory parole.
However, parole eligibility does not mean automatic release. It means the person can appear before the parole board to request consideration for release.
Good-time credits: Alaska generally allows a good-time deduction of one-third of the term for following the rules of the correctional facility under AS 33.20.010. However, a person sentenced for first- or second-degree murder under AS 11.41.100 or 11.41.110 is not eligible for any good-time deduction (AS 33.20.010(a)(4)), and neither is a person serving a mandatory 99-year term. Good time therefore cannot shorten the two-thirds parole-eligibility figure for a murder sentence.
Consecutive sentences: When a defendant is convicted of multiple murders or multiple serious felonies, the court can impose consecutive sentences. This effectively extends the minimum time before parole eligibility by stacking the terms end to end.
Alaska Board of Parole
The Alaska Board of Parole is a five-member board appointed by the governor and confirmed by the legislature. The board has authority to grant, deny, or revoke parole for eligible inmates.
When evaluating a life-sentenced inmate for parole, the board considers the nature and severity of the offense, the inmate's behavior and rehabilitation efforts during incarceration, victim impact statements, the inmate's release plan, and public safety risk.
If parole is denied, the board schedules a new hearing, typically one to five years later, depending on the circumstances. Inmates can continue to appear before the board at regular intervals until parole is granted or their sentence expires.
Alaska's parole grant rate for violent offenders has historically been conservative. The board takes a careful approach to releasing people convicted of murder, and many life-sentenced inmates serve well beyond their initial eligibility date before being granted parole.
Why Alaska Has No Formal LWOP Sentence
Alaska's lack of a sentence formally labeled life without parole is not the result of a single dramatic reform. It reflects a consistent philosophical position that stretches back to the territory's pre-statehood era.
The Death Penalty Was Never Part of Statehood
Alaska abolished the death penalty in 1957, two years before it became the 49th state on January 3, 1959. The territorial legislature voted to end capital punishment, and when Alaska drafted its state constitution, it did not include a provision for the death penalty. Alaska has never executed a single person as a state.
This early rejection of the ultimate punishment set the tone for Alaska's approach to sentencing more broadly. If the state was unwilling to impose death, it also showed reluctance to impose a sentence that amounted to dying in prison with no hope of release.
Sentencing Structure and Parole Ineligibility
Alaska's sentencing code has always used definite terms of years rather than indeterminate "life" sentences. Every sentence is expressed as a specific number of years (up to 99), but not every sentence carries a parole eligibility date. Mandatory 99-year terms under AS 12.55.125(a) and 99-year definite terms under AS 12.55.125(l) are not eligible for discretionary parole, and a court may order a defendant ineligible for discretionary parole under AS 12.55.115 (AS 33.16.090(a)(1)).
A Rehabilitation-Centered Philosophy
Alaska's constitutional framers and subsequent legislatures have consistently expressed a preference for rehabilitation as a goal of the criminal justice system. The Alaska Constitution (Article I, Section 12) states that "penal administration shall be based on the principle of reformation and upon the need for protecting the public."
Notable Life Sentence Cases in Alaska
Brian Steven Smith: 235+ Years (2021)
Brian Steven Smith, a South African-born Anchorage resident, was convicted of two murders and sentenced to over 235 years in prison, effectively guaranteeing he will die behind bars despite Alaska's lack of LWOP. Smith killed Kathleen Henry in 2019, and video evidence on his phone led investigators to connect him to the earlier murder of Veronica Abouchuk. The case shocked Alaska and demonstrated how prosecutors use consecutive sentences to achieve de facto life without parole.
State v. Dayton (2022)
This case addressed sentencing challenges under Alaska's presumptive sentencing framework. The Alaska Court of Appeals examined the application of aggravating factors and the limits of judicial discretion in imposing sentences near the 99-year maximum. The ruling clarified how trial courts should weigh multiple aggravating factors when determining sentences for serious violent offenses.
Greenway v. State (2021)
The Alaska Court of Appeals ruled on parole eligibility calculations for inmates serving lengthy sentences for multiple offenses. The case addressed how good-time credits interact with consecutive sentences and clarified the timeline for parole board review.
Sheldon Andy: Life Sentence for Double Murder
Sheldon Andy was sentenced to 198 years for a double murder in rural Alaska. His case highlighted both the severity of sentences Alaska courts can impose and the unique challenges of crime and punishment in remote Alaska communities, where law enforcement response times can be measured in hours rather than minutes.
Recent Legislative Changes
Alaska has enacted several significant changes to its sentencing laws in recent years.
SB 91: Criminal Justice Reform (2016, Modified 2019)
Senate Bill 91 was Alaska's most ambitious criminal justice reform effort in decades. Originally passed in 2016, it reduced penalties for many nonviolent offenses and modified parole eligibility rules. The bill was controversial, and significant portions were rolled back by subsequent legislation in 2019 after public backlash over perceived leniency.
The 2019 modifications restored longer sentences for certain offenses and tightened parole eligibility requirements for violent crimes. However, the core structure of Alaska's definite-term sentencing system remained unchanged.
HB 49: Crimes Against Children (2022)
House Bill 49 increased penalties for crimes committed against children, including longer presumptive sentencing ranges for sexual abuse of a minor, child exploitation, and murder of a child. The bill responded to concerns that Alaska's sentencing framework did not adequately account for the vulnerability of child victims.
Under HB 49, defendants convicted of first-degree murder of a child face sentences at or near the 99-year maximum, with aggravating factors making it nearly certain that the sentence will exceed any realistic lifespan.
Ongoing Legislative Debates
Proposals to introduce LWOP in Alaska surface periodically, particularly after high-profile violent crimes. Advocates argue that some offenders are too dangerous to ever release. Opponents point to Alaska's constitutional commitment to rehabilitation and argue that the consecutive sentencing tools already available to prosecutors, as demonstrated in the Brian Steven Smith case, effectively achieve the same result without formally abandoning the principle that every sentence should include some possibility of redemption.
As of March 2026, no LWOP legislation is actively advancing in the Alaska Legislature.
| Year | Change |
|---|---|
| 2022 | HB 49 increased penalties for crimes against children |
| 2019 | SB 91 modifications restored stricter sentencing for violent crimes |
| 2016 | SB 91 enacted broad criminal justice reforms, including parole changes |
| 1957 | Death penalty abolished (pre-statehood) |
Juvenile Life Sentences
Alaska has no sentence formally labeled juvenile life without parole (JLWOP), but its statutes do not guarantee every long sentence a parole date: a mandatory 99-year term under AS 12.55.125(a) carries no discretionary parole eligibility, and the statute's text contains no age exception.
Separately, the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. Alabama (2012) banned mandatory LWOP for juveniles. Many states have struggled to implement Miller, and some still allow discretionary JLWOP after individualized hearings.
Juveniles convicted of serious offenses in Alaska are sentenced under the same definite-term framework as adults when tried as adults, but with additional protections. Courts must consider the defendant's age, maturity, and capacity for rehabilitation when determining the sentence length.
Alaska law also provides mechanisms for juvenile offenders to be tried in the juvenile justice system rather than adult court for most offenses, keeping the focus on rehabilitation and reintegration rather than long-term incapacitation.
Historical Context
Alaska's sentencing philosophy did not develop in isolation. It reflects the unique circumstances of the state's history, geography, and political culture.
Pre-Statehood Foundations
When Alaska was a U.S. territory, its legal system was shaped by federal oversight and the practical realities of governing a vast, sparsely populated region. The territorial legislature's decision to abolish the death penalty in 1957 was influenced by both moral arguments and practical considerations: maintaining execution infrastructure in such a remote territory was seen as impractical and unnecessary.
This pragmatic progressivism carried into statehood. The 1956 Alaska Constitutional Convention produced a constitution that explicitly prioritized reformation in its criminal justice provisions, reflecting the delegates' belief that the new state should chart a more humane course than the existing states.
No Death Penalty and No Formal LWOP Sentence
Alaska is one of the most lenient states in the country when it comes to maximum punishment. It has no death penalty and no sentence formally labeled life without parole. The only other state that comes close is Hawaii, which also lacks the death penalty but does allow LWOP for certain offenses.
This combination makes Alaska distinctive in the American criminal justice landscape. Even so, a person serving a mandatory 99-year term for first-degree murder is not eligible for discretionary parole and may seek only one sentence modification after serving half the term.
The Practical Reality
Beyond the mandatory 99-year terms that carry no parole eligibility, Alaska prosecutors and judges have tools to ensure that the most dangerous offenders serve extraordinarily long sentences. Consecutive sentencing for multiple counts, aggravating factor enhancements, and the 99-year maximum all work together to produce sentences that exceed any realistic human lifespan.
The Brian Steven Smith case (235+ years) is a clear example. While Smith technically has a parole eligibility date, it falls well beyond any conceivable lifespan. Alaska achieves the practical effect of LWOP without formally having it in the sentencing code.
Alaska Life Sentence at a Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Maximum sentence | 99 years (definite term) |
| Life with parole minimum | ~20 years at the statutory floor (two-thirds of the 30-year minimum term); often much later once aggravating factors apply |
| LWOP available | No formal LWOP sentence, but mandatory 99-year terms (AS 12.55.125(a)) carry no discretionary parole eligibility |
| Death penalty | No (abolished 1957, pre-statehood) |
| Execution methods | N/A |
| JLWOP banned | No statute formally labeled JLWOP; the mandatory 99-year term's text has no age exception |
| Parole board | 5-member board, governor-appointed |
| Key statutes | AS 11.41.100, AS 11.41.110, AS 12.55.125, AS 12.55.155, AS 33.16.090, AS 33.20.010 |
| Sentencing structure | Definite terms of years (no indeterminate "life") |
Related Pages
- How Long Is a Life Sentence? State-by-State Guide
- Murder Sentencing Guidelines for Every State
- What Is Capital Murder?
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is a life sentence in Alaska?
Alaska does not technically impose 'life' sentences. Instead, courts impose definite terms of up to 99 years (at least 30 years for first-degree murder). Discretionary parole eligibility requires serving two-thirds of the court-imposed term, and good time does not reduce a murder sentence, so the earliest possible eligibility date is roughly 20 years, reached only if a court imposes the 30-year statutory minimum. A mandatory 99-year term carries no discretionary parole eligibility at all, only one request for sentence modification after half the term. Aggravating factors or consecutive sentences for multiple counts can push the effective eligibility date, or the sentence itself, well beyond any human lifespan.
Does Alaska have life without parole?
Not by that name. Alaska has no sentence formally labeled life without parole; every sentence is a definite term of years. But a person sentenced to a mandatory 99-year term for first-degree murder under AS 12.55.125(a), or to a 99-year definite term under AS 12.55.125(l), is not eligible for discretionary parole and may apply only once for a sentence modification after serving half the term. Prosecutors also use consecutive sentences to achieve the practical effect of LWOP in extreme cases.
Does Alaska have the death penalty?
No. Alaska abolished the death penalty in 1957, two years before becoming a state. It has never executed anyone as a state. Alaska's constitution emphasizes reformation as a principle of penal administration, and there is no active movement to reinstate capital punishment.
Can a juvenile get life without parole in Alaska?
Alaska has no sentence formally labeled juvenile life without parole. However, its statutes do not guarantee every long sentence a parole date: a mandatory 99-year term under AS 12.55.125(a) carries no discretionary parole eligibility, and the statute's text contains no age exception. Separately, Miller v. Alabama (2012) bars mandatory life without parole for juveniles under the U.S. Constitution.
What is the longest prison sentence ever given in Alaska?
Brian Steven Smith received over 235 years in consecutive sentences for two murders in 2021. While Alaska has no formal LWOP sentence, prosecutors used consecutive sentencing to ensure Smith's parole eligibility date falls far beyond any possible human lifespan, achieving the practical equivalent of a permanent sentence.
Updates
Punctuation restored where an automated edit had produced comma splices.
Corrected the page to explain that Alaska mandatory 99-year murder terms carry no discretionary parole eligibility, fixed the statutory sources and ranges for first- and second-degree murder, and added that murder sentences earn no good time.
Corrected two compounding errors in the first-degree murder figures: Alaska's statutory minimum sentence for first-degree murder is 30 years, not 20, and discretionary parole for a murder conviction requires serving two-thirds of the court-imposed sentence, not one-third — so the real parole-eligibility date is roughly 20 years only at the 30-year statutory floor, and is typically much later once aggravating factors lengthen the sentence.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Alaska Statutes, Title 33. Probation, Prisons, Pardons, and Prisoners, Chapter 16. Parole Administration
§ 33.16.090Eligibility for discretionary parole and minimum terms to be servedIn force
(a) A prisoner sentenced to an active term of imprisonment of at least 181 days may, in the discretion of the board, be released on discretionary parole if the prisoner (1) has served the amount of time specified under (b) of this section, except that (A) a prisoner sentenced to one or more mandatory 99-year terms under AS 12.55.125(a) or one or more definite terms under AS 12.55.125(l) is not eligible for consideration for discretionary parole; (B) a prisoner is not eligible for consideration of discretionary parole if made ineligible by order of a court under AS 12.55.115; (C) a prisoner imprisoned under AS 12.55.086 is not eligible for discretionary parole unless the actual term of imprisonment is more than one year; (D) a prisoner sentenced to a single sentence within or below a presumptive range set out in AS 12.55.125(c), (d)(2) (4), (e)(3) and (4), or (i) who has not been allowed by the three-judge panel under AS 12.55.175 to be considered for discretionary parole release is not eligible for consideration of discretionary parole; (E) a prisoner sentenced to a single sentence, including a consecutive or partially consecutive sentence, that is not eligible for a good time…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Alaska Statutes, Title 12. Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 55. Sentencing and Probation
§ 12.55.115Fixing eligibility for discretionary parole at sentencingIn force
The court may, as part of a sentence of imprisonment, further restrict the eligibility of a prisoner for discretionary parole for a term greater than that required under AS 33.16.090 and 33.16.100.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 31 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Riley v. State (Court of Appeals of Alaska 2002, 60 P.3d 204)“…in prison, Judge Steinkruger exercised her authority under AS 12.55.115 and ordered that Riley not be eligible…”
- Reyes v. State (Court of Appeals of Alaska 1999, 978 P.2d 635)“…12.55.155(a), or any minimum term set [by the judge] under AS 12.55.115 at sentencing, whichever is greater.” R…”
- State v. Malloy (Alaska Supreme Court 2002, 46 P.3d 949)“…2.55.125(a)-is ninety-nine years; 10 and under AS 12.55.115, a court sentencing a defendant for fir…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Alaska Statutes, Title 33. Probation, Prisons, Pardons, and Prisoners, Chapter 20. Remission of Sentences; Executive Pardons and Clemency
§ 33.20.010Computation of good timeIn force
(a) Notwithstanding AS 12.55.125(f)(3) and 12.55.125(g)(3), a prisoner convicted of an offense against the state or a political subdivision of the state and sentenced to a term of imprisonment that exceeds three days is entitled to a deduction of one-third of the term of imprisonment rounded off to the nearest day if the prisoner follows the rules of the correctional facility in which the prisoner is confined. A prisoner is not eligible for a good time deduction if the prisoner has been sentenced (1) to a mandatory 99-year term of imprisonment under AS 12.55.125(a) after June 27, 1996; (2) to a definite term under AS 12.55.125(l); (3) for a sexual felony under AS 12.55.125(i) (A) and has one or more prior sexual felony convictions as determined under AS 12.55.145(a)(4); or (B) that is an unclassified or a class A felony; or (4) for an unclassified felony under AS 11.41.100 or 11.41.110. (b) [Repealed, 15 ch 7 SLA 1996.] (c) A prisoner may not be awarded a good time deduction under (a) of this section for any period spent in a treatment program, in a private residence, or on electronic monitoring.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 59 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Morton v. Hammond (Alaska Supreme Court 1979, 604 P.2d 1)“…ka House of Representatives, in recommending the passage of AS 33.20.010-.060, reported, “The principle of good…”
- Forster v. State (Court of Appeals of Alaska 2010, 236 P.3d 1157)“…eit good time by misbehaving in prison. 61 But AS 33.20.010(a)(1) declares that a first-degree murd…”
- Murphy v. City of Wrangell (Alaska Supreme Court 1988, 763 P.2d 229)“…s entitled to a “good time” reduction in his sentence under AS 33.20.010. 4 He seeks compensatory d…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Alaska Statutes, Title 11. Criminal Law, Chapter 41. Offenses Against the Person
§ 11.41.120ManslaughterIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) A person commits the crime of manslaughter if the person (1) intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes the death of another person under circumstances not amounting to murder in the first or second degree; (2) intentionally aids another person to commit suicide; or (3) knowingly manufactures or delivers a controlled substance in violation of AS 11.71.030 or 11.71.040(a)(1) for schedule IVA controlled substances, and another person dies as a direct result of ingestion of the controlled substance; the death is a result that does not require a culpable mental state. (b) Manslaughter is a class A felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 91 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Dunlop (Alaska Supreme Court 1986, 721 P.2d 604)“…the language of the statutes in question. At issue here are AS 11.41.120, 7 AS 11.41.-220, 8…”
- State v. Blank (Alaska Supreme Court 2004, 90 P.3d 156)“…Blank, 3 P.3d at 362 . . Id. . AS 11.41.120(a). . AS 28.35.060(a). . B…”
- Pears v. State (Court of Appeals of Alaska 1983, 672 P.2d 903)“…ve been charged as manslaughter. Manslaughter is defined in AS 11.41.120(a) and provides: A person commits the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Alaska Manslaughter and Criminally Negligent Homicide Laws (2026)
Sources and References
- AS 11.41.100(akleg.gov).gov
- AS 11.41.110(akleg.gov).gov
- AS 11.41.120(akleg.gov).gov
- AS 12.55.155(akleg.gov).gov
- Alaska Board of Parole(gov.alaska.gov).gov
- Article I, Section 12(ltgov.alaska.gov).gov
- *Miller v. Alabama* (2012)(law.cornell.edu).gov
- AS 12.55.125(akleg.gov).gov
- AS 33.16.090(akleg.gov).gov
- AS 33.20.010, Computation of good time(akleg.gov)