
Alabama Grandparents' Rights: Visitation Law After Ex parte E.R.G.
Alabama grandparent visitation law after the state's top court struck the old statute: the current presumption, standing rules, and how to petition.
Loading...
54 articles

Alabama grandparent visitation law after the state's top court struck the old statute: the current presumption, standing rules, and how to petition.

Alaska requires clear and convincing proof of harm before a court can order grandparent visitation over a fit parent's objection. What the law and case law say.

Arizona's grandparent visitation and custody law in one statute: standing triggers, the special-weight standard, and how the adoption cutoff works.

Arkansas grandparent visitation after Linder v. Linder: the 2019 rebuttable-presumption fix in Act 679, standing triggers, and what courts have not yet tested.

California grandparent visitation law: the filing bar while parents are married, the presumptions against visitation, and how to petition.

Can grandparents get custody of a grandchild? The real standard (unfitness or extraordinary circumstances), when it applies, and kinship-care resources.

Colorado's grandparent 'family time' law was recodified in 2023. What the current Title 14 statute requires, and why the old Title 19 cites no longer apply.

Connecticut requires proof of real harm before a court can order grandparent visitation. What the law and Roth v. Weston require, honestly explained.

DC has no separate grandparent visitation statute. Visitation runs through the Third-Party Custody Act. How standing, the presumption, and procedure work.

Delaware lets any adult petition for visitation, but a fit, objecting parent still gets real protection. How Delaware's two-part standard actually works.

Florida grandparent visitation is only available after a parent's death, disappearance, or incapacity. What the law allows, and what it does not.

Georgia grandparent visitation requires clear and convincing proof of harm to the child. Standing triggers, the legal standard, and how to file.

Grandparent visitation rights explained: what Troxel v. Granville actually requires, the five state approaches, standing rules, and the real odds of winning.

Compare grandparents' rights in all 50 states and DC: which require proof of harm, use a legal presumption, or are governed by court rulings, not statute.

Hawaii has two grandparent visitation routes with different standards. What each requires, and what the law does not say about adoption.

Idaho's grandparent visitation statute was held facially unconstitutional in Nelson v. Evans (2022). What that ruling means for Idaho grandparents now.

Illinois grandparent visitation requires proof of undue harm to the child, not just a best-interest finding. Standing triggers and the real standard.

Indiana grandparent visitation applies the fit-parent presumption at a special weight standard. Standing triggers and the adoption survival rule.

Iowa grandparent visitation applies only after a parent's death, and requires clear and convincing evidence to overcome a presumption favoring the parent.

Kansas rebuilt its grandparent visitation law in 2024. What the new three-part standard requires, and how it differs from the old statute.

How Kentucky grandparent visitation actually works under KRS 405.021 and Walker v. Blair, plus custody, adoption, and filing basics.

Louisiana grandparent visitation under Civil Code Art. 136 and R.S. 9:344, plus its unusual post-adoption continuing-contact remedy.

Maine grandparent visitation under Section 1803, Rideout v. Riendeau, and Pitts v. Moore, which the Law Court called unsettled.

Maryland grandparent visitation is governed by Koshko v. Haining, not the two-sentence statute. Custody, adoption, and filing explained.

Massachusetts grandparent visitation under G.L. c.119 Section 39D really means Blixt v. Blixt's significant-harm standard. Here's how it works.

Michigan grandparenting time under the post-DeRose MCL 722.27b, its presumption and 8-factor test, custody, adoption, and filing.

Minnesota grandparent visitation under Section 257C.08 and SooHoo v. Johnson, which left the standard for grandparents genuinely untested.

Mississippi grandparent visitation under Section 93-16-3 really runs on Martin v. Coop and Zeman v. Stanford. Here is how the standard works.

Missouri grandparent visitation law, the 2002 intact-family bar, and why courts have narrowed these cases to occasional, minimal contact.

Montana lets any grandparent petition for contact, but Polasek v. Omura requires courts to weigh a fit parent's wishes first. What that means.

Nebraska requires clear and convincing proof of a significant, quality bond, not just frequent contact. What Nelson v. Nelson actually requires.

Nevada presumes AGAINST grandparent visitation once a parent denies it. What the clear-and-convincing standard requires, and how modification differs.

New Hampshire's visitation statute and its custody-intervention doctrine are two different standards. Why confusing them misleads grandparents.

New Jersey's visitation statute reads like a bare best-interest test, but Moriarty v. Bradt requires proof of harm first. What that actually means.

New Mexico requires special factors beyond its 8-factor statute before visitation can override a fit parent. What Williams v. Williams actually requires.

New York's DRL 72 covers both visitation and custody, under different standards. What E.S. v. P.D. and Suarez v. Williams each actually require.

North Carolina grandparent visitation and custody law: standing rules, the intact-family bar, and what Owenby v. Young and Alexander v. Alexander control.

North Dakota grandparent visitation law after Hoff v. Berg: the Nonparent Custody and Visitation Act's caretaker and harm standards, explained.

Ohio grandparent visitation law after Harrold v. Collier: the special-weight requirement, standing triggers, and the honest odds of winning a case.

Oklahoma grandparent visitation law: why Neal v. Lee makes this a harm-standard state, not just a rebuttable presumption, and what that means in practice.

Oregon grandparent visitation and custody law under ORS 109.119: the presumption a grandparent must rebut, and why courts declined a harm requirement.

Pennsylvania grandparent custody law after D.P. v. G.J.P. and the 2018 Act 21 fix: the current standing triggers, and why older sources may be wrong.

Rhode Island grandparent visitation law: three overlapping statutes, the clear-and-convincing standard, and why the U.S. Supreme Court cited RI as a model.

South Carolina grandparent visitation law under Section 63-3-530(33): the Camburn v. Smith standard, the de facto custodian track, and the honest odds.

South Dakota's grandparent visitation law reads permissively, but no court has tested it against constitutional fit-parent protections. What that means.

Tennessee requires grandparents to prove danger of substantial harm to win visitation, a rule its own courts set in Hawk v. Hawk before Troxel existed.

Texas grandparents must prove denial of access would significantly impair the child to overcome a presumption favoring a fit parent. Here is how the law works.

Utah requires clear and convincing evidence of a caregiver relationship or parental unfitness before a grandparent can win visitation. How the law works.

Vermont's grandparent visitation statute has no fit-parent presumption and has not visibly changed since 1984. Here is what that unresolved gap means for you.

Virginia has no dedicated grandparent visitation statute. One legitimate-interest law covers custody and visitation, requiring clear and convincing evidence.

Washington's old grandparent visitation law was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in Troxel. Its rebuilt statute now requires proof of harm twice over.

West Virginia does not have one grandparent visitation standard. Which of three statutes applies to your case can decide the outcome. Here is how they differ.

Wisconsin's grandparent visitation statute reads like a bare best-interest law, but a 2019 court decision requires clear and convincing evidence. Here is how.

Wyoming lets a grandparent sue for visitation at any time with no trigger required, but no court has tested that bare text against fit-parent protections.