Maryland
Maryland Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 8, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Maryland protects whistleblowers through several statutory and common law exceptions to the at-will employment doctrine. State employees who disclose gross mismanagement, waste of money, or law violations are shielded from retaliation under Md. Code Ann., State Personnel and Pensions § 5-305, and licensed health care workers receive parallel protections under Md. Code Ann., Health Occupations § 1-502.
A Summary of Maryland Whistleblower Law
Maryland follows the employment-at-will doctrine. This means employees can be fired for any reason or no reason. However, the state of Maryland has several statutory protections and common law protections that are used as an exception to this doctrine. Statutory protections are laws that are enacted by the state's legislature to cover specific subject areas, e.g., discrimination, while common law protections are laws that are created by courts to address areas not covered by enacted laws.

This is a summary of Maryland Whistleblower Laws, make sure to check out the Federal Whistleblower Laws as well.
Whistleblower Rights in Maryland
Common Law Protections
Maryland recognizes a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. This means it is illegal for employers to discharge employees for reasons that violate Maryland's public policy. To determine what constitutes public policy, the courts usually look at prior judicial opinions, administrative regulations, or laws enacted by the legislature. Some of the activities that are protected under the public policy include:
- Testifying at a proceeding or hearing.
- Exercising a right endorsed by a statute or any other law.
- Reporting a violation of a law to the relevant authority.
To ensure guaranteed protection, whistleblowers should make disclosures concerning law violations by their employers or co-workers to the appropriate law enforcement agency. Simply discussing the violation with a supervisor or employer may reduce a whistleblower's likelihood of being protected under Maryland's public policy.
Statutory Protections for Whistleblowers in Maryland
Public Employees
No supervisor, appointing authority, or head of a principal unit is allowed to take or fail to take a personnel action against an employee as a reprisal for:
- Disclosing an abuse of authority, gross mismanagement, or a waste of money.
- Disclosing a violation of a law.
- Disclosing the existence of substantial danger to the safety and health of the public.
Md. Code Ann., State Personnel, and Pensions § 5-305.
Discrimination in Employment
It is illegal for an employer to discharge or in any way discriminate against an employee in retaliation for:
- Opposing discriminatory practices opposed by this statute.
- Making a charge, testifying, or participating in an investigation, hearing, or proceeding under this statute.
Under this statute, it is illegal for employers to discharge, alter terms of employment, refuse to hire, or in any way discriminate against an employee because of the employee's race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, genetic information, or a disability which does not negatively impact the individual's job performance.
Md. Code Ann., State Gov't § 20-606.
Occupational Safety and Health
No individual or employer is allowed to discharge or in any way discriminate against an employee in retaliation for:
- Filing a complaint under this statute.
- Instituting a proceeding or an action under this statute.
- Testifying or intending to testify in an action or proceeding related to this statute.
- Exercising a right endorsed by this statute on behalf of himself, herself, or others.
Also, employers are not allowed to in any way retaliate against an employee because the employee gained knowledge through participating in a group medical coverage.
Md. Code. Ann., Lab. & Empl. § 5-604.
State Contractors
It is against the law for employers to discharge or in any way discriminate against an employee in retaliation for:
- Disclosing information concerning abuse of authority, gross mismanagement, or a waste of money.
- Disclosing the existence of substantial danger to public health and safety.
- Disclosing a violation of a law.
- Refusing to participate in an activity or practice that would result in a violation of a law.
Md. Code Ann., State Finance, and Procurement § 11-303.
Wage Discrimination
Employers are not allowed to take an adverse employment action against an employee in retaliation for:
- Inquiring about the employee's own wages or another employee's wages.
- Disclosing the employee's own wages, or discussing another employee's wages that were voluntarily disclosed.
- Asking the employer to provide a reason for the employee's wages.
- Aiding or encouraging another employee's exercise of rights under this section.
Md. Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. § 3-304.1(a).
Public School Employees
Public school employers are not allowed to discharge, alter terms of employment, or in any way discriminate against a public school employee in retaliation for:
- Disclosing or threatening to disclose to a supervisor a violation of a rule, law, or regulation by the employer.
- Providing information or testifying before a public body conducting an investigation, inquiry, or hearing concerning a violation of a rule, law, or regulation by the employer.
- Refusing to participate in an activity that would result in a violation of a law, rule, or regulation.
Also, the employee has to notify the supervisor or a representative of the employer about the violation and give the employer a reasonable amount of time to correct the violation.
Md. Code Ann., Education § 6-902.
Health Care Workers
Employers are not allowed to discharge, alter terms of employment, or in any way discriminate against a licensed or board-certified health care worker in retaliation for:
- Disclosing or threatening to disclose to a supervisor a violation of a rule, law, or regulation by the employer.
- Providing information or testifying before a public body conducting an investigation, inquiry, or hearing concerning a violation of a rule, law, or regulation by the employer.
- Refusing to participate in an activity that would result in a violation of a law, rule, or regulation.
For the protection to be valid, the whistleblower has to have a reasonable and good faith belief that the employer has or is still engaging in the violation of a law. Also, the whistleblower has to notify the supervisor or a representative of the employer about the violation and give the employer a reasonable amount of time to correct the violation.
Md. Code Ann., Health Occupations § 1-502.
Workers' Compensation
Employers are not allowed to discharge covered employees in retaliation for filing a workers' compensation claim. Md. Code. Ann., Lab. & Empl. § 9-1105.
Whistleblower Hotlines in Maryland
Complaints under the public employees statute are filed with the Secretary of Budget and Management, who heads the Department of Budget and Management. Md. Code Ann., State Pers. & Pens. § 5-309(a).
To file complaints under the occupational safety and health statute and wage discrimination statute, call the Commissioner of Labor and Industry at 410-767-2992.
To file complaints under the discrimination statute, call the Maryland Commission on Civil Rights (MCCR) at 410-767-8600.
Whistleblower Retaliation Claims in Maryland
Unless stated otherwise by a statute, whistleblowers who suffer unlawful retaliation should file a lawsuit with the appropriate court within 3 years of the retaliation. The statute-specific deadlines below run from 15 days to 2 years, so ask a Maryland employment lawyer in a free case evaluation which one governs your claim (attorney advertising).
Public Employees
Complaints under this statute should be filed with the Secretary of Budget and Management within 6 months after the complainant first knew of or reasonably should have known of the violation. Md. Code Ann., State Pers. & Pens. § 5-309(a).
State Contractors
Lawsuits under this statute should be filed within 1 year of the retaliation.
Health Care Workers
Claims under this act should be filed with the appropriate court within 1 year of the retaliation or after learning of the retaliation.
Public School Employees
Claims under this act should be filed with the appropriate court within 6 months of the retaliation or after learning of the retaliation. However, whistleblowers are required to exhaust administrative remedies before proceeding with the lawsuit. The deadline for filing administrative complaints is 15 days.
Occupational Safety and Health
Complaints under this statute should be filed in writing with the Commissioner of Labor and Industry within 30 days of the retaliation.
Discrimination
Complaints under this statute should be filed with the Maryland Commission on Civil Rights (MCCR) within 300 days of the alleged act for an unlawful employment practice other than harassment, and within 2 years for a harassment complaint against an employer. Md. Code Ann., State Gov't § 20-1004(c). The employment provisions reach employers with 15 or more employees, except that a harassment complaint reaches an employer with one or more employees. Md. Code Ann., State Gov't § 20-601(d).
Whistleblower Retaliation and Violation Penalties in Maryland
Unless stated otherwise by a statute, employers who carry out unlawful retaliation against an employee may be liable to the aggrieved employee for a combination or any of the following:
- Reinstatement of the employee to the previous job position.
- Reinstatement of full fringe benefits and seniority rights.
- Lost wages.
- Litigation costs, including attorney fees.
- Injunctive relief.
- Removal of adverse personnel record entries related to the violation.
- Plus, any other relief deemed appropriate by the court.
Discrimination
Employers who carry out unlawful retaliation against an employee may be liable to the aggrieved employee for a combination or any of the following:
- Reinstatement of the employee to the previous job position.
- Reinstatement of full fringe benefits and seniority rights.
- Lost wages.
- Litigation costs, including attorney fees.
- Injunctive relief.
- Plus, any other relief deemed appropriate by the court.
Compensatory damages for future pecuniary losses and nonpecuniary harm are capped by employer size: $50,000 for 15 to 100 employees, $100,000 for 101 to 200, $200,000 for 201 to 500, and $300,000 for more than 500. Back pay in a discriminatory compensation case reaches no further than the 2 years before the complaint was filed. Md. Code Ann., State Gov't § 20-1009(b).
Workers' Compensation
Employers who carry out unlawful retaliation against an employee may be found guilty of a misdemeanor. Upon conviction, they may be liable for a fine not exceeding $500 or a jail term not exceeding 1 year, or both.
Wage Discrimination
The Commissioner may bring an action for injunctive relief and damages against a person who willfully violates the equal pay subtitle. Md. Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. § 3-308(b).
More Maryland Laws
Updates
Corrected the statutory citations for Maryland's health care worker and public school employee whistleblower acts, fixed the office that receives state employee whistleblower complaints, replaced an unsupported 36-month compensation limit with the statutory damages caps, and re-cited the equal pay retaliation section to the provision that actually contains it.
Updated the Maryland discrimination-complaint filing deadline from the outdated 6-month figure to the current 300-day deadline (2 years for harassment complaints), renamed the agency from its former name (Human Relations Commission) to its current name (Maryland Commission on Civil Rights), and corrected a citation that named a repealed code article to the current State Government Article section it actually links to.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maryland Code, State Personnel and Pensions Article
§ 5-305In forcecited in 2 of our articles
§5–305. Subject to the limitations of § 5–306 of this subtitle, a supervisor, appointing authority, or the head of a principal unit may not take or refuse to take any personnel action as a reprisal against: (1) an employee who discloses information that the employee reasonably believes evidences: (i) an abuse of authority, gross mismanagement, or gross waste of money; (ii) a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or (iii) a violation of law; (2) an employee of the Department of Juvenile Services who discloses information to the Director of Juvenile Justice Monitoring or staff of the Office of the Correctional Ombudsman, including the Juvenile Justice Monitoring Unit relating to the Unit’s duties under § 9–4014 of the State Government Article; (3) an employee of the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services who discloses information to the Correctional Ombudsman or staff of the Office of the Correctional Ombudsman relating to the Office’s duties under § 9–4004 of the State Government Article; or (4) an employee who, following a disclosure under item (1), (2), or (3) of this section, seeks a remedy provided under this subtitle or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Also relied on in: Maryland Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rules (2026)
§ 5-309In force
§5–309. (a) (1) An employee subject to this subtitle may file with the Secretary a complaint that alleges a violation of § 5-305 of this subtitle. (2) A complaint under this subtitle must be filed within 6 months after the complainant first knew of or reasonably should have known of the violation. (b) When a complaint is received, the Secretary or designee promptly shall: (1) send a copy of the complaint to the head of the principal unit named in the complaint; and (2) advise the head of the principal unit to respond in writing to the complaint within 20 days after receiving the copy. (c) Within 60 days after a complaint is received: (1) the complaint shall be investigated to determine whether a violation of § 5-305 of this subtitle has occurred: (i) by the Secretary or designee of the Secretary; or (ii) if the Department is charged in the complaint, by a designee of the Governor; and (2) the Secretary or designee or the Governor's designee shall: (i) take the action described in subsection (d)(1) or (2) of this section; and (ii) issue to the complainant and head of the principal unit a written decision that includes any remedial action taken.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Maryland Code, Health Occupations Article
§ 1-502In force
§1–502. Subject to § 1-503 of this subtitle, an employer may not take or refuse to take any personnel action as reprisal against an employee because the employee: (1) Discloses or threatens to disclose to a supervisor or board an activity, policy, or practice of the employer that is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation; (2) Provides information to or testifies before any public body conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry into any violation of a law, rule, or regulation by the employer; or (3) Objects to or refuses to participate in any activity, policy, or practice in violation of a law, rule, or regulation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Maryland Code, State Finance and Procurement Article
§ 11-303In force
§11–303. An employer may not take or refuse to take any personnel action as a reprisal against an employee because the employee: (1) discloses information that the employee reasonably believes evidences: (i) an abuse of authority, gross mismanagement, or gross waste of money; (ii) a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or (iii) a violation of law; (2) objects to or refuses to participate in any activity, policy, or practice in violation of law; or (3) following a disclosure under item (1) of this section, seeks a remedy provided under this subtitle.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Maryland Code, Education Article
§ 6-902In force
§6–902. Subject to § 6–903 of this subtitle, a public school employer may not take or refuse to take any personnel action as reprisal against a public school employee because the employee: (1) Discloses or threatens to disclose to a supervisor an activity, a policy, or a practice of the employer that is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation; (2) Provides information to or testifies before any public body conducting an investigation, a hearing, or an inquiry into any violation of a law, rule, or regulation by the employer; or (3) Objects to or refuses to participate in any activity, policy, or practice in violation of a law, rule, or regulation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Maryland Code, Labor and Employment Article
§ 3-304.1In force
§3–304.1. (a) An employer may not: (1) prohibit an employee from: (i) inquiring about, discussing, or disclosing the wages of the employee or another employee; or (ii) requesting that the employer provide a reason for why the employee’s wages are a condition of employment; (2) require an employee to sign a waiver or any other document that purports to deny the employee the right to disclose or discuss the employee’s wages; or (3) take any adverse employment action against an employee for: (i) inquiring about the employee’s wages or another employee’s wages; (ii) disclosing the employee’s own wages; (iii) discussing another employee’s wages if those wages have been disclosed voluntarily; (iv) asking the employer to provide a reason for the employee’s wages; or (v) aiding or encouraging another employee’s exercise of rights under this section. (b) (1) Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, an employer may, in a written policy provided to each employee, establish reasonable workday limitations on the time, place, and manner for inquiries about or the discussion or disclosure of employee wages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Maryland Code, State Government Article
§ 20-1004In forcecited in 3 of our articles
§20–1004. (a) Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged discriminatory act may file a complaint with the Commission. (b) The complaint shall: (1) be in writing; (2) state: (i) the name and address of the person or State or local unit alleged to have committed the discriminatory act; and (ii) the particulars of the alleged discriminatory act; (3) contain any other information required by the Commission; and (4) be signed by the complainant under oath. (c) (1) (i) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection, a complaint shall be filed within 6 months after the date on which the alleged discriminatory act occurred. (ii) A complaint filed with a federal or local human relations commission within 6 months after the date on which the alleged discriminatory act occurred shall be deemed to have complied with subparagraph (i) of this paragraph. (2) (i) A complaint alleging an unlawful employment practice other than harassment shall be filed within 300 days after the date on which the alleged discriminatory act occurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Also relied on in: Maryland Workplace Harassment Laws: 2-Year Complaint Deadline (2026), Wrongful Termination in Maryland (2026): Laws, Deadlines, How to File
§ 20-1009In forcecited in 2 of our articles
§20–1009. (a) If, after reviewing all of the evidence, the administrative law judge finds that the respondent has engaged in a discriminatory act, the administrative law judge shall: (1) issue a decision and order stating the judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (2) issue and cause to be served on the respondent an order requiring the respondent to: (i) cease and desist from engaging in the discriminatory acts; and (ii) take affirmative action to effectuate the purposes of the applicable subtitle of this title. (b) (1) If the respondent is found to have engaged in or to be engaging in an unlawful employment practice charged in the complaint, the remedy may include: (i) enjoining the respondent from engaging in the discriminatory act; (ii) ordering appropriate affirmative relief, including the reinstatement or hiring of employees, with or without back pay; (iii) awarding compensatory damages; or (iv) ordering any other equitable relief that the administrative law judge considers appropriate.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Sources and References
- Md. Code, State Personnel & Pensions § 5-305: whistleblower protection for state employees(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Md. Code Ann., Health Occupations § 1-502: Health Care Worker Whistleblower Protection Act, prohibited reprisals(mgaleg.maryland.gov)
- Md. Code Ann., Education § 6-902: Public School Employee Whistleblower Protection Act, prohibited reprisals(mgaleg.maryland.gov)
- Md. Code Ann., State Personnel & Pensions § 5-309: complaint filed with the Secretary of Budget and Management within 6 months(mgaleg.maryland.gov)
- Md. Code Ann., Labor & Employment § 3-304.1: adverse action barred for inquiring about, discussing or disclosing wages(mgaleg.maryland.gov)
- Md. Code Ann., State Gov't § 20-1004: deadlines for filing a complaint with the Maryland Commission on Civil Rights(mgaleg.maryland.gov)
- Md. Code Ann., State Gov't § 20-1009: remedies and the tiered caps on compensatory damages(mgaleg.maryland.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.