Missouri
Missouri Pornography Laws (2026): HB 1839 Age Verification
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Pornography is legal for adults to privately view and possess in Missouri, and the state's obscenity law targets commercial promotion rather than personal use. What has changed for Missouri in 2026 is age verification: a requirement that has already been enforced for months through an Attorney General rule is about to become a fully codified statute with steep civil penalties.
Is Pornography Legal in Missouri?
Missouri's obscenity statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.030 (promoting obscenity in the second degree), criminalizes promoting obscene material, or possessing it with the purpose to promote it, for pecuniary gain, knowing its content and character. It also reaches producing, presenting, directing, or participating in an obscene performance for pecuniary gain, and separately covers material that is "pornographic for minors." A first offense is a class A misdemeanor; a second or subsequent offense is a class E felony.
Because those subsections require a purpose to promote for pecuniary gain, private adult possession or viewing of obscene material without any commercial purpose is not itself a crime. Pecuniary gain is not an element everywhere in the chapter, though. Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.020 (promoting obscenity in the first degree) reaches wholesale promotion of obscene material, meaning distribution for resale or redistribution, with no pecuniary-gain element, and it is a class E felony outright. Section 573.030.1(5) likewise omits pecuniary gain where a person promotes, produces, presents, directs, or participates in a performance that is pornographic for minors by computer, electronic transfer, or internet and makes it available to a specific individual the defendant knows to be a minor.
18 U.S.C. Section 2257, the federal record-keeping requirement for producers of sexually explicit content, applies regardless of Missouri law and is not a state-created obligation.
Missouri's Age-Verification Law: A Rule That Predates the Statute
Missouri presents an unusual sequence: the substance of the age-verification requirement has already been enforced for months before the law that codifies it takes legal effect.
An Attorney General administrative rule, issued under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, has required covered adult websites to use reasonable age-verification methods since December 1, 2025. In July 2026, the legislature caught up: Governor Mike Kehoe signed HB 1839 (sponsored by Rep. Sherri Gallick, HCS for HBs 1839, 2921 and 3015) on July 9, 2026, amending Chapter 407 of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act to put the requirement into statute. HB 1839 itself does not take legal effect until August 28, 2026, meaning the underlying AV requirement will have been operating in practice for roughly nine months before its own statutory effective date.
The law applies to any commercial website where at least 33.3% of the content is sexual material harmful to minors. Covered sites must verify a user's age before granting access and are barred from retaining the user's identifying information. Enforcement runs through the Missouri Attorney General in civil court, with penalties of up to $10,000 per day of noncompliance, $10,000 for each instance of improperly retained identification data, and up to an additional $250,000 if a minor is shown to have accessed restricted material.
No lawsuit against either the Attorney General's rule or HB 1839 had been filed as of this writing, despite formal objection letters sent by trade groups, including the Computer & Communications Industry Association, the Missouri Chamber of Commerce, the Free Speech Coalition, and NetChoice. Some platforms responded by exiting the market rather than complying: Pornhub blocked access to Missouri users entirely rather than build age verification for the state.
For the full compliance picture and how Missouri compares to neighboring states, see the Missouri age-verification law page.
Child Sexual Abuse Material and Other Offenses Against Minors
Missouri criminalizes possession of child sexual abuse material under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.037, which reaches knowing or reckless possession of material depicting a minor under 18, or obscene material portraying what appears to be a minor. The statute grades severity by the number and type of images. Possessing one still image is a class D felony. It becomes a class B felony if the person possesses more than twenty still images of child sexual abuse material, more than twenty obscene still images, any single motion picture, film, videotape, or other moving image, or has previously been found guilty under the section. A collection of twenty-five still photographs therefore carries the class B grade, not the class D grade that applies to a single image. Punishment applies separately to each item possessed, meaning a defendant found with multiple images or videos can face multiple, stacked counts.

Missouri has a separate legal framework for cases involving minors who create or share images of themselves or other minors. That process is addressed on the Missouri sexting laws page and is not duplicated here.
Nonconsensual Intimate Images (Revenge Porn)
Missouri's nonconsensual-disclosure law, known as Evan's Voice Act, is codified at Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.110 alongside Sections 573.112 and 573.114. It criminalizes intentionally disseminating an identifiable person's sexual image, obtained under circumstances where a reasonable person would know the image should remain private, with intent to harass, threaten, or coerce the depicted person, knowing or having reason to know they did not consent. The standard offense is a class D felony; it becomes a class C felony when the depicted person is a minor or a vulnerable person.
The law also creates a private civil cause of action. A successful plaintiff can recover the greater of $10,000 or actual damages, plus attorney's fees, and the statute specifically provides that humiliation or embarrassment alone is an adequate showing of damages, with no physical manifestation required. The law exempts disclosures made for lawful criminal investigations, reporting unlawful conduct, and other legitimate public purposes.
This state remedy is separate from the federal Take It Down Act, which requires platforms to remove nonconsensual intimate imagery, including AI-generated deepfakes, once notified. For platform-level removal steps and a state comparison, see Revenge Porn Laws by State.
Public Indecency
Missouri addresses public sexual conduct through Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 566.093 (sexual misconduct, first degree), effective since January 1, 2017. The statute covers exposing one's genitals under circumstances the person knows are likely to cause affront or alarm, engaging in sexual contact in the presence of a third person likely to be affronted or alarmed, and having sexual intercourse or deviate sexual intercourse in a public place before a third person. A base offense is a class B misdemeanor; it becomes a class A misdemeanor if the person has a prior conviction under the same chapter, or an equivalent out-of-state conviction.
Adult Businesses in Missouri
Missouri regulates sexually oriented businesses directly at the state level, unlike many neighboring states that leave the subject entirely to local ordinances. Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.531 bars establishing such a business within 1,000 feet, measured in a straight line, of a primary or secondary school, house of worship, state-licensed day care, public library, public park, residence, or another sexually oriented business. The statute also bars anyone under 18 from the premises, prohibits alcohol on site, requires semi-nude employees to keep at least six feet of distance from patrons and eighteen inches from the floor, bars touching between employees and patrons, and requires the business to close between midnight and 6 a.m.

Two related sections add a narrow local-option structure for adult cabarets, and the narrowness matters: each subsection of Section 573.507 and of Section 573.503 applies only to "any city not within a county and any county," which in Missouri means St. Louis City and county governments. An ordinary municipality such as Kansas City, Springfield, or Columbia cannot act under these two sections at all. Where they do apply, Section 573.507 authorizes, but does not itself impose, a minimum age for admission into an adult cabaret, a requirement that security personnel be present, random drug testing of cabaret employees, and a ban on live public nudity within ten feet of an observer; Section 573.503 allows background checks on cabaret employees for certain prostitution, drug, money-laundering, tax-evasion, and gambling convictions. None of these requirements apply unless the city or county has separately adopted them. Separately, Section 573.540 confirms that the sexually-oriented-business provisions do not preempt local regulation, so any political subdivision may enact ordinances that are the same as or stricter than state law as long as they are not inconsistent with it.
Penalties at a Glance
| Offense | Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Promoting obscenity, 2nd degree (1st/subsequent) | Section 573.030 | Class A misdemeanor; class E felony |
| Possession of CSAM (one still image / more than 20 stills, any moving image, or prior offense) | Section 573.037 | Class D felony / class B felony, per item |
| Nonconsensual disclosure of private sexual images (standard / minor or vulnerable victim) | Section 573.110 | Class D felony / class C felony, plus civil claim |
| Sexual misconduct, 1st degree (base / repeat) | Section 566.093 | Class B misdemeanor / class A misdemeanor |
| Age-verification noncompliance | HB 1839 / Ch. 407 | Up to $10,000/day, $10,000/instance of retained data, up to $250,000 if a minor accesses content |
Practical Risks Beyond the Statute
Criminal exposure under Missouri law is not the only consideration. Employer device and internet-use policies can make viewing adult content on a work computer or network grounds for termination, independent of whether any statute was violated. Federal obligations layer on top of state law: 18 U.S.C. Section 2257 imposes record-keeping duties on producers of sexually explicit content regardless of Missouri's rules, and the federal Take It Down Act creates its own platform takedown obligations for nonconsensual intimate imagery. Anyone facing a specific legal question in this area should consult an attorney for advice specific to their situation.
More Missouri Laws
- Missouri Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
- Missouri Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties
- Missouri Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Privacy
- Missouri Court Records: How to Search Case.net, What's Public, and How Expungement Works
- Missouri Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights

Consult an attorney for advice specific to your situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is pornography legal in Missouri?
Yes, for private adult viewing and possession. Missouri's second-degree obscenity statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.030, reaches promoting obscene material, or possessing it with the purpose to promote it, for pecuniary gain, so there is no crime for privately viewing or possessing such material without a commercial purpose. Other offenses in the same chapter do not turn on pecuniary gain at all: Section 573.020 makes wholesale promotion of obscene material a class E felony outright, and Section 573.030.1(5) reaches making a performance pornographic for minors available online to a specific individual the defendant knows is a minor.
Does Missouri require age verification for porn sites?
Yes. An Attorney General rule under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act has required reasonable age verification on qualifying sites since December 1, 2025. HB 1839, signed July 9, 2026, codifies and expands that requirement into statute effective August 28, 2026.
What triggers Missouri's age-verification requirement?
A website is covered when at least one-third (33.3%) of its content is sexual material harmful to minors. Covered sites must verify a user's age before granting access and may not retain the user's identifying information.
What happens if a site does not comply with Missouri's age-verification law?
HB 1839 authorizes the Missouri Attorney General to bring a civil suit seeking up to $10,000 per day of noncompliance, $10,000 for each instance of improperly retained identification data, and an additional penalty of up to $250,000 if a minor is shown to have accessed restricted material.
Has Missouri's age-verification law been challenged in court?
No lawsuit against the Attorney General's rule or against HB 1839 had been filed as of this writing, despite objection letters from trade groups including the Free Speech Coalition and NetChoice. Some sites, including Pornhub, chose to block access to Missouri users rather than comply.
What is the penalty for possessing child sexual abuse material in Missouri?
Under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.037, possessing one still image is a class D felony. The offense is a class B felony if the person possesses more than twenty still images of child sexual abuse material, more than twenty obscene still images, any motion picture, film, videotape, or other moving image, or has previously been found guilty under the section. Punishment applies separately to each item possessed.
Is sharing intimate images without consent a crime in Missouri?
Yes. Missouri's Evan's Voice Act, Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.110, makes it a class D felony to intentionally disseminate an identifiable person's private sexual image without consent and with intent to harass, threaten, or coerce them. The offense is a class C felony when the depicted person is a minor or a vulnerable person, and the victim can also bring a civil claim.
Does Missouri regulate where adult businesses can operate?
Yes. Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.531 requires sexually oriented businesses to be at least 1,000 feet from schools, houses of worship, day cares, libraries, parks, and residences, bars minors and alcohol from the premises, and requires the business to close between midnight and 6 a.m. Local governments may add further restrictions.
Updates
Corrected the child sexual abuse material penalty grades to include the more-than-twenty-still-images class B felony trigger, fixed the description of the local adult cabaret options in Sections 573.507 and 573.503 (a minimum age for admission, available only to St. Louis City and counties), and removed an overbroad statement that Missouri criminalizes obscenity only for pecuniary gain.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Page published covering Missouri's obscenity, age-verification (HB 1839 and the predecessor AG rule), CSAM, Evan's Voice Act, public-indecency, and adult-business statutes.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XXXVIII (CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT; PEACE OFFICERS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS), Chapter 573
§ 573.030Promoting obscenity in the second degree — penalties.In force
1. A person commits the offense of promoting pornography for minors or obscenity in the second degree if, knowing of its content and character, he or she: (1) Promotes or possesses with the purpose to promote any obscene material for pecuniary gain; or (2) Produces, presents, directs or participates in any obscene performance for pecuniary gain; or (3) Promotes or possesses with the purpose to promote any material pornographic for minors for pecuniary gain; or (4) Produces, presents, directs or participates in any performance pornographic for minors for pecuniary gain; or (5) Promotes, possesses with the purpose to promote, produces, presents, directs or participates in any performance that is pornographic for minors via computer, electronic transfer, internet or computer network if the person made the matter available to a specific individual known by the defendant to be a minor. 2. The offense of promoting pornography for minors or obscenity in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor unless the person has been found guilty of an offense pursuant to this section committed at a different time, in which case it is a class E felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1999
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. McKinney (Supreme Court of Missouri 1988, 756 S.W.2d 527)“…promoting pornography in the second degree in violation of section 573.030, RSMo 1978, and was sentenced to 180 days imp…”
- State v. El Dorado Management Corp. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1990, 801 S.W.2d 401)“…A misdemeanor of promoting obscenity in the second degree, RSMo § 573.030 (1988), for which it was fined one thou…”
- State v. Triplett (Missouri Court of Appeals 1986, 722 S.W.2d 633)“…misdemeanor of promoting pornography in the second degree, § 573.030, RSMo 1978, as amended. The incident leadin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 573.037Possession of child pornography — penalty.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
1. A person commits the offense of possession of child pornography if such person knowingly or recklessly possesses any child pornography of a minor less than eighteen years of age or obscene material portraying what appears to be a minor less than eighteen years of age. 2. The offense of possession of child pornography is a class D felony if the person possesses one still image of child pornography or one obscene still image. The offense of possession of child pornography is a class B felony if the person: (1) Possesses: (a) More than twenty still images of child pornography; or (b) More than twenty obscene still images; or (c) Child pornography comprised of one motion picture, film, videotape, videotape production, or other moving image; or (d) Obscene material comprised of one motion picture, film, videotape production, or other moving image; or (2) Has previously been found guilty of an offense under this section. 3. A person who has committed the offense of possession of child pornography is subject to separate punishments for each item of child pornography or obscene material possessed by the person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In State v. Liberty (2012) the Supreme Court of Missouri held an earlier version of section 573.037 ambiguous as to the unit of prosecution, so under the rule of lenity possessing eight images at once supported one conviction. State v. Roggenbuck (2012) allowed separate counts where images were acquired at different times.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Liberty (Supreme Court of Missouri 2012, 370 S.W.3d 537)✓Liberty was convicted on eight counts for eight child-pornography images seized the same day; the court held they did depict sexual conduct, but the version of section 573.037 then in force was ambiguous on the unit of prosecution, so lenity left a single conviction.
- State v. Roggenbuck (Supreme Court of Missouri 2012, 387 S.W.3d 376)✓Five child-pornography photographs were downloaded and saved to Roggenbuck's user account at five different times; the court held each temporally distinct acquisition was a separate act under section 573.037, so his five convictions did not violate double jeopardy.
- F.R. v. St. Charles County Sheriff's Department (Supreme Court of Missouri 2010, 301 S.W.3d 56)“…35, RSMo, promoting child pornography in the second degree; section 573.037, RSMo, possession of child pornography, or se…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Missouri Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, Missouri Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
§ 573.110Nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images, offense of — definitions — elements — exemptions — immunity from liability, when — penalty — private cause of action, when.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
1. As used in this section and section 573.112, the following terms mean: (1) "Computer", a device that accepts, processes, stores, retrieves, or outputs data and includes, but is not limited to, auxiliary storage and telecommunications devices connected to computers; (2) "Computer program", a series of coded instructions or statements in a form acceptable to a computer that causes the computer to process data and supply the results of the data processing; (3) "Data", a representation in any form of information, knowledge, facts, concepts, or instructions including, but not limited to, program documentation, that is prepared or has been prepared in a formalized manner and is stored or processed in or transmitted by a computer or in a system or network. Data is considered property and may be in any form including, but not limited to, printouts, magnetic or optical storage media, punch cards, data stored internally in the memory of the computer, or data stored externally that is accessible by the computer; (4) "Image", a photograph, film, videotape, digital recording, or other depiction or portrayal of an object, including a human body; (5) "Intimate parts", the fully…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Anthony Madison (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2026)“…and nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.110, though the state grand jury later retu…”
- Gray (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2025)“…it knows how to say so in the statute itself. See, e.g., Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.110.7 (“In addition to the criminal penalti…”
- Soule v. Langley Recycling, Inc. (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2020)“…sexual images of her without her consent, in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.110. Now before the Cou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Missouri Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Missouri Video Recording Laws: Public Spaces, Private Property, and Consent Rules, Missouri Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections
§ 573.531Establishment of business, prohibited where — nudity in establishment prohibited — display of sexual activities, requirements — state requirements — hours of operation — minors and alcohol prohibited — definitions.In force
1. No person shall establish a sexually oriented business within one thousand feet of any preexisting primary or secondary school, house of worship, state-licensed day care facility, public library, public park, residence, or other sexually oriented business. This subsection shall not apply to any sexually oriented business lawfully established prior to August 28, 2010. For purposes of this subsection, measurements shall be made in a straight line, without regard to intervening structures or objects, from the closest portion of the parcel containing the sexually oriented business to the closest portion of the parcel containing the preexisting primary or secondary school, house of worship, state-licensed day care facility, public library, public park, residence, or other sexually oriented business.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
§ 573.507Minimum age limit — security personnel — random drug testing — space limitation — prohibition of public displays.In force
1. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may establish a minimum age limit for admission into any adult cabaret within the city or county. 2. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may require security personnel to be present on the premises of any adult cabaret within the city or county. 3. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may require employers of any adult cabaret within the city or county to conduct random testing for the presence of illegal substances within the blood or urine of any or all employees of such adult cabaret. 4. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may prohibit within such city or county any live public nudity within ten feet of any person observing such nudity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1997
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 521 U.S. 844)“…s in poolrooms, billiard halls, or where alcohol is sold); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.507 (1995) (no minors in adult cabarets);…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 573.503Local government may require background checks.In force
Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may, by order or ordinance, require a background check be conducted on all employees of any adult cabaret to ascertain whether any such employees have been convicted of or have pled guilty to any misdemeanor or felony involving prostitution or aiding or abetting prostitution, drug possession or trafficking, money laundering, tax evasion, or illegal gambling activity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
§ 573.020Promoting obscenity in the first degree — penalty.In force
1. A person commits the offense of promoting obscenity in the first degree if, knowing of its content and character, such person: (1) Wholesale promotes or possesses with the purpose to wholesale promote any obscene material; or (2) Wholesale promotes for minors or possesses with the purpose to wholesale promote for minors any material pornographic for minors; or (3) Promotes, wholesale promotes or possesses with the purpose to wholesale promote for minors material that is pornographic for minors via computer, internet or computer network if the person made the matter available to a specific individual known by the defendant to be a minor. 2. The offense of promoting obscenity in the first degree is a class E felony. 3. As used in this section, "wholesale promote" means to manufacture, issue, sell, provide, mail, deliver, transfer, transmute, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, or to offer or agree to do the same for purposes of resale or redistribution.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1986
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Opinion No. (1986) (Missouri Attorney General Reports 1986)“…ch laws shall not be greater than those of this chapter. Section 573.020 , RSMo 1978, provides: 1. A…”
- State v. Schamma (Missouri Court of Appeals 1983, 659 S.W.2d 589)“…IV, V and VI of promoting pornography in the first degree, § 573.020, RSMo.1978. The jury assessed punishment at o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 573.540No state preemption on regulation — consistency with state law required for local law.In force
1. Nothing in sections 573.525 to 573.537 shall be construed as preempting or preventing any political subdivision of this state from maintaining, enacting, or enforcing any local ordinance, rule, regulation, resolution, or similar law concerning the regulation of sexually oriented businesses or similar adult oriented businesses which is stricter than but not inconsistent with the provisions of sections 573.525 to 573.537. 2. Political subdivisions of this state are specifically authorized to maintain, enact, and enforce local ordinances, rules, regulations, resolutions, or other similar laws concerning the regulation of sexually oriented businesses or similar adult-oriented businesses which are the same as or stricter than but not inconsistent with the provisions of sections 573.525 to 573.537.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ocello v. Koster (Supreme Court of Missouri 2011, 354 S.W.3d 187)“…em in their challenge to the validity of sections 573.525 to 573.540, RSMo Supp.2010 1 (“the Act”), which regulat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XXXVIII (CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT; PEACE OFFICERS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS), Chapter 566
§ 566.093Sexual misconduct, first degree, penalties.In force
1. A person commits the offense of sexual misconduct in the first degree if such person: (1) Exposes his or her genitals under circumstances in which he or she knows that his or her conduct is likely to cause affront or alarm; (2) Has sexual contact in the presence of a third person or persons under circumstances in which he or she knows that such conduct is likely to cause affront or alarm; or (3) Has sexual intercourse or deviate sexual intercourse in a public place in the presence of a third person. 2. The offense of sexual misconduct in the first degree is a class B misdemeanor unless the person has previously been found guilty of an offense under this chapter, or has previously been found guilty of an offense in another jurisdiction which would constitute an offense under this chapter, in which case it is a class A misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- J.D.B. v. Juvenile Officer (Missouri Court of Appeals 1999, 2 S.W.3d 150)“…the class B misdemeanor of second degree sexual misconduct. Section 566.093, RSMo 1994. Count II, which was admitted by t…”
- Giaimo v. State (Missouri Court of Appeals 2001, 41 S.W.3d 49)“…SMo 1994, and one count of second-degree sexual misconduct, § 566.093 RSMo 1994. 1 Appellant was sentenced to fiv…”
- State v. Hicks (Missouri Court of Appeals 2017, 526 S.W.3d 273)“…Hicks was charged with first-degree sexual misconduct under § 566.093, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2016. “A person commits the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.030 (Promoting obscenity in the second degree)(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- HCS for HBs 1839, 2921 & 3015 (2026) - Age Verification on Adult Websites(documents.house.mo.gov).gov
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.037 (Possession of child sexual abuse material)(law.justia.com)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.110 (Evan's Voice Act; nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images)(law.justia.com)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 566.093 (Sexual misconduct, first degree)(law.justia.com)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.531 (Establishment of sexually oriented business, prohibited where)(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.507 (Minimum age limit, security personnel, drug testing)(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.037 (Possession of child sexual abuse material, penalty), effective August 28, 2026(revisor.mo.gov)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.020 (Promoting obscenity in the first degree)(revisor.mo.gov)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.503 (Background checks on adult cabaret employees, city not within a county and counties)(revisor.mo.gov)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 573.540 (Local ordinances not preempted)(revisor.mo.gov)