New York Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules for Landline, Cell, and VoIP

New York's one-party consent law applies to all types of phone calls. Under Penal Law Section 250.00, you can record any phone call you participate in without informing or getting consent from the other person. The law defines "wiretapping" as the intentional overhearing or recording of a telephonic communication by a person other than the sender or receiver, without the consent of either party. Since you are a party to any call you make or receive, your own knowledge of the recording satisfies the consent requirement.

This guide covers the rules for recording landline, cell phone, and VoIP calls in New York, what happens when you call someone in a different state, business call recording obligations, and the penalties for illegal phone recording.

The Core Rule: One-Party Consent for Phone Calls

What the Statute Says

Penal Law Section 250.00 defines "wiretapping" as the intentional overhearing or recording of a telephonic or telegraphic communication by a person other than the sender or receiver, without the consent of either the sender or receiver, by means of any instrument, device, or equipment.

The critical phrase is "without the consent of either the sender or receiver." As a participant in a phone call, you are either the sender or the receiver. Your decision to record constitutes consent from at least one party, which satisfies the statute.

What This Means in Practice

• You can record any phone call you are on without telling the other person
• You can use a smartphone recording app, dedicated call recorder, or external recording device
• You can record calls on any platform: landline, cell phone, VoIP, satellite phone
• No beep tone, announcement, or warning is legally required in New York
• The recording is legal from the moment the call connects

What Is Illegal

Recording a phone call is illegal in New York when:

• You intercept a call between two other people and you are not a participant
• You use a wiretap device to monitor someone else's phone line
• You access someone's stored voicemail or call recordings without authorization
• You record a phone call without the consent of either the caller or the recipient (i.e., as a third party with no participant's consent)

Types of Phone Calls Covered

Landline Calls

Traditional landline phone calls fall squarely within the "telephonic communication" definition in Penal Law 250.00. You can record any landline call you participate in. This includes:

• Home phone calls
• Office phone calls
• Conference calls routed through a landline system
• Calls through traditional PBX (private branch exchange) systems

Cell Phone Calls

Cell phone calls receive the same treatment as landline calls under New York law. The statute's reference to "telephonic communication" encompasses all voice calls, regardless of the technology used. You can record:

• Standard cellular voice calls
• Wi-Fi calling
• Calls through cellular data connections
• Conference calls on your cell phone

VoIP and Video Calls

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) calls and video calls with audio fall under the "electronic communication" provisions of Penal Law 250.00. The statute defines the interception of electronic communications as the intentional acquiring, receiving, collecting, overhearing, or recording of an electronic communication without the consent of the sender or intended receiver. As a participant, your consent satisfies this requirement. Covered platforms include:

• Zoom meetings and calls
• Microsoft Teams calls
• Google Meet sessions
• Skype calls
• FaceTime calls
• WhatsApp and Signal voice calls
• Discord voice channels
• Any other internet-based voice or video platform

Conference Calls and Group Calls

On a conference call with multiple participants, the one-party consent rule still applies. Your participation and knowledge of the recording is sufficient. You do not need consent from every participant on the call. However, if any participant is located in a two-party consent state, the stricter law may apply to your recording of that person.

Cross-State Phone Call Recording

The Challenge of Interstate Calls

New York borders several states with different recording consent requirements. When you make or receive a call that crosses state lines, the question of which state's law applies becomes critical.

Neighboring States and Their Requirements

State	Consent Type	Key Consideration
Connecticut	Two-party consent	Adjacent to NYC metro area
Massachusetts	Two-party consent	Border state, strict wiretap law
New Jersey	One-party consent	Compatible with NY law
Pennsylvania	Two-party consent	Border state
Vermont	One-party consent	Compatible with NY law

Which Law Applies?

Courts do not have a single universal rule for determining which state's law applies to interstate phone calls. The general principles are:

• The stricter law typically governs. If you are in New York (one-party consent) and call someone in Pennsylvania (two-party consent), the Pennsylvania law may apply to the interaction, exposing you to liability if you record without consent from all parties.
• Where the recording occurs matters. Some courts focus on where the recording device is located. If you are recording in New York, New York law applies to your act of recording.
• Where the parties are located matters. Some courts apply the law of the state where each party is located. A party in Pennsylvania can invoke Pennsylvania's wiretap law even if the recording occurred in New York.
• Intent and knowledge. If you know or should know that the other party is in a two-party consent state, recording without disclosure carries greater legal risk.

Best Practices for Interstate Calls

To minimize legal risk when making calls that may involve parties in other states:

• Determine where the other party is located before recording
• If the other party is in a two-party consent state, inform them that the call is being recorded
• Get verbal consent at the start of the call ("I'm recording this call, is that OK with you?")
• If you record customer service calls, note that many businesses already announce recording, giving you implied consent to record as well
• When in doubt, disclose the recording

Business Phone Call Recording in New York

Employer and Business Obligations

New York businesses can record phone calls with customers, clients, and partners under one-party consent. As long as the business (through its employee on the call) is a party, the recording is legal without notice. However, many businesses choose to provide notice as a best practice because:

• It protects the business when callers are in two-party consent states
• It builds trust and demonstrates transparency
• Industry regulations may require disclosure (financial services, healthcare)
• Federal FCC regulations may impose separate requirements for certain call types

Common Notice Methods

Businesses typically satisfy notice requirements through:

• Pre-call announcement: "This call may be recorded for quality assurance and training purposes." If the caller stays on the line after hearing this message, they have given implied consent.
• Verbal disclosure by the representative: The employee informs the caller that the call is being recorded and asks if they consent.
• Terms of service: Some businesses include call recording disclosures in their terms of service or privacy policies, though this alone may not satisfy two-party consent states.

Call Center Compliance

Businesses operating call centers in New York that handle calls from across the country should implement universal notice procedures. The safest approach is to treat every call as if it is subject to two-party consent by providing a recording announcement at the start of each call. This eliminates the need to determine each caller's location.

Civil Rights Law 52-c

If the business is monitoring employee phone calls (not just customer calls), Civil Rights Law Section 52-c requires the employer to provide written notice to employees upon hiring. This applies to monitoring of telephone conversations as well as email and internet usage.

Recording Customer Service and Business Calls as a Consumer

Your Right to Record

When you call a business and hear "this call may be recorded," the business is exercising its one-party consent right. You have the exact same right. As a participant in the call, you can record:

• Customer service calls
• Insurance company calls
• Bank and financial institution calls
• Utility company calls
• Calls with contractors, vendors, and service providers

Practical Benefits of Recording Business Calls

Recording business calls can protect you by:

• Creating a record of verbal promises or commitments
• Documenting customer service interactions that may be disputed later
• Preserving evidence of billing disputes or service complaints
• Recording insurance claim discussions
• Documenting conversations about warranties, returns, or refunds

Criminal Penalties for Illegal Phone Recording

Eavesdropping: Penal Law 250.05

Penal Law Section 250.05 makes eavesdropping a Class E felony. For phone call recording, eavesdropping occurs when a person who is not a party to the call records it without the consent of either party. Penalties include:

• Up to 4 years in state prison for a first offense
• Fines up to $5,000
• A permanent felony criminal record

Possession of Eavesdropping Devices: Penal Law 250.10

Possessing equipment designed for wiretapping with the intent to use it illegally is a Class A misdemeanor under Penal Law 250.10, carrying up to 1 year in jail.

Civil Liability

Victims of illegal phone recording can file civil lawsuits seeking actual damages, punitive damages, attorney's fees, and injunctive relief. Unlike some states that provide statutory per-violation damages, New York courts assess damages based on the specific facts of each case.

Phone Recordings as Evidence

Admissibility in Court

Phone recordings made legally under one-party consent are admissible in New York courts. To use a phone recording as evidence, you must:

• Authenticate the recording by testifying about when, where, and how you made it
• Identify the speakers on the recording
• Demonstrate the recording is unaltered and complete
• Show that the recording is relevant to the case

CPLR 4506 Exclusionary Rule

CPLR Section 4506 makes illegally obtained phone recordings inadmissible in both criminal and civil proceedings. If a recording was made in violation of the eavesdropping statute, it will be suppressed on motion. The one exception: illegally obtained recordings are admissible against the person who committed the eavesdropping.

Federal Law and Phone Recording

The federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. 2511) follows a one-party consent model, consistent with New York's approach. Under federal law, recording a phone call is legal as long as at least one party consents. The federal Stored Communications Act (18 U.S.C. 2701) separately addresses unauthorized access to stored voicemail and other stored communications.

More New York Recording Laws

Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording

Back to New York Recording Laws