Browse our full library of legal guides, state law breakdowns, and practical legal information.
13741 articles
Browse by Category →
New York's DRL 72 covers both visitation and custody, under different standards. What E.S. v. P.D. and Suarez v. Williams each actually require.
New Mexico requires special factors beyond its 8-factor statute before visitation can override a fit parent. What Williams v. Williams actually requires.
New Jersey's visitation statute reads like a bare best-interest test, but Moriarty v. Bradt requires proof of harm first. What that actually means.
New Hampshire's visitation statute and its custody-intervention doctrine are two different standards. Why confusing them misleads grandparents.
Nevada presumes AGAINST grandparent visitation once a parent denies it. What the clear-and-convincing standard requires, and how modification differs.
Nebraska requires clear and convincing proof of a significant, quality bond, not just frequent contact. What Nelson v. Nelson actually requires.
Montana lets any grandparent petition for contact, but Polasek v. Omura requires courts to weigh a fit parent's wishes first. What that means.
Missouri grandparent visitation law, the 2002 intact-family bar, and why courts have narrowed these cases to occasional, minimal contact.
Mississippi grandparent visitation under Section 93-16-3 really runs on Martin v. Coop and Zeman v. Stanford. Here is how the standard works.
Minnesota grandparent visitation under Section 257C.08 and SooHoo v. Johnson, which left the standard for grandparents genuinely untested.
Michigan grandparenting time under the post-DeRose MCL 722.27b, its presumption and 8-factor test, custody, adoption, and filing.
Massachusetts grandparent visitation under G.L. c.119 Section 39D really means Blixt v. Blixt's significant-harm standard. Here's how it works.