Utah
Wrongful Termination in Utah (2026): Laws, Deadlines, How to File
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 10, 2026). · 28 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Utah is an at-will state, so an employer can usually fire someone for any reason or no reason. A firing is wrongful only when it breaks a specific law, a binding contract term, or a clear and substantial public policy. The main state statute is the Utah Antidiscrimination Act (UADA), Utah Code Title 34A, Chapter 5, which bars an employer with 15 or more employees from discharging or retaliating against a person because of a protected characteristic (Utah Code 34A-5-106(1)(a)(i)).
Utah handles those claims through an administrative process at the Utah Labor Commission, not a state-court lawsuit. To compare other states, see our guide to wrongful termination laws by state.
Information last verified on October 10, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers Utah law on firing employees: the at-will rule and its exceptions as Utah courts apply them, the Utah Antidiscrimination Act (Utah Code 34A-5-101 and following), the public-policy tort, and narrower Utah protections such as jury service (78B-1-116), workers' compensation (34A-2-114) and safety complaints (34A-6-203), with short notes on the federal laws that also apply. The federal rules in full are on our wrongful termination laws by state guide. It does not cover severance agreements; see Utah severance pay laws.
Is Utah an at-will state?
Yes. In Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd., 771 P.2d 1033 (Utah 1989), the Utah Supreme Court surveyed the exceptions to at-will employment, listing public policy first, and described when courts find "an express or implied contract term for employment for a certain period or a covenant for dismissal only with cause." Utah does not treat bad faith alone as an exception (see below). For how the doctrine works day to day, see Utah at-will employment laws.
Discrimination under the Utah Antidiscrimination Act
Utah Code 34A-5-106(1)(a)(i) says: "An employer may not refuse to hire, promote, discharge, demote, or terminate a person, or to retaliate against, harass, or discriminate in matters of compensation or in terms, privileges, and conditions of employment against a person otherwise qualified, because of" a listed characteristic. The list is:
- race, color, sex, and pregnancy, childbirth, or pregnancy-related conditions
- age, "if the individual is 40 years of age or older"
- religion and national origin
- disability
- sexual orientation and gender identity
Who is covered. An employer is "a person employing 15 or more employees within the state for each working day in each of 20 calendar weeks or more in the current or preceding calendar year" (Utah Code 34A-5-102(1)(i)(D)). The state and its political subdivisions are employers regardless of size. Religious organizations and leaders, their affiliates, and the Boy Scouts of America are excluded. The UALD's own page says your employer must have at least 15 employees, with a lower number for certain cases of national origin, citizenship or equal pay discrimination. The Act "supersedes and preempts any ordinance, regulation, standard, or other legal action by a local government entity ... that relates to the prohibition of discrimination in employment" (Utah Code 34A-5-102.5(1)), so a city or county ordinance cannot create a separate employment-discrimination claim; the UALD process described below is the state-law route, including in Salt Lake City.
Retaliation. "Retaliate" covers adverse action because a person "opposes an employment practice prohibited under this chapter" or "files charges, testifies, assists, or participates in any way in a proceeding, investigation, or hearing under this chapter" (34A-5-102(1)(y)). The definition covers any practice the chapter prohibits, so it reaches retaliation tied to age and disability claims as well.
Pregnancy accommodation. Section 34A-5-106(1)(g) addresses accommodation of pregnancy, childbirth and related conditions.
Expression of beliefs. An employer may not discharge an employee for lawful expression outside the workplace of "religious, political, or personal convictions, including convictions about marriage, family, or sexuality," unless the expression is in direct conflict with the employer's essential business-related interests (34A-5-112(3)).
Sexual orientation and gender identity, federally. Federal law covers them too: in Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court held that "An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII," which covers employers with 15 or more employees (42 U.S.C. 2000e(b)).
Sexual harassment allegations: employers of any size
Utah Code 34A-5-114, enacted in 2024 and amended in 2025 and 2026, is the one place the 15-employee floor does not apply. It bars an employer of any size from retaliating against an employee for alleging sexual harassment or sexual assault, or for refusing a confidentiality clause as a condition of employment (34A-5-114(2)(b)). A confidentiality clause about sexual misconduct required as a condition of employment is void (34A-5-114(2)(a)), an employee may withdraw from a settlement agreement that includes a confidentiality clause regarding sexual misconduct within three business days after agreeing to it (34A-5-114(2)(c)), and an employer that tries to enforce a prohibited clause "is liable for all costs, including reasonable attorney fees" (34A-5-114(3)). The section does not say how a retaliation claim under it is enforced, and our research did not confirm the route; ask the UALD or a lawyer.
Filing a charge with the UALD
The 180-day deadline. "A request for agency action made under this section shall be filed within 180 days after the alleged discriminatory or prohibited employment practice occurs" (Utah Code 34A-5-107(1)(c)). The UALD describes it this way: "within 180 days of when you learned of the last alleged discriminatory act. If more than 180 days have passed since the last date of harm, but less than 300 days, your charge will be sent to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for investigation."

How to file. The Utah Antidiscrimination and Labor Division takes an Employment Discrimination Intake Questionnaire through its My-LC portal. The questionnaire is not yet the charge: if it meets the filing requirements, the UALD prepares a charge for you to sign before a notary (the statute requires a request "verified under oath or affirmation," 34A-5-107(1)(b)), and the charge "will be officially opened" once the signed copy is returned, so leave time before the 180-day deadline.
Dual filing with the EEOC. The UALD says a case "will be forwarded to the EEOC for dual filing under applicable federal laws, but UALD will investigate the case." The statute lets the division transfer a request to the EEOC under a work-share agreement in effect on the day of transfer (34A-5-107(1)(d)).
After the determination. A party may request an evidentiary hearing within 30 days after the UALD's determination (34A-5-107(4)(c), (5)(c)). Either party may then ask the commissioner or the Appeals Board to review the presiding officer's order, and the final order is subject to judicial review under Title 63G (34A-5-107(11)-(12)).
The UADA is the only state-law route
Exclusive remedy. "The procedures contained in this section are the exclusive remedy under state law for employment discrimination based upon" race, color, sex, retaliation, pregnancy, age, religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation or gender identity (Utah Code 34A-5-107(15)). There is no state-court damages lawsuit under the Act.
Choosing federal court ends the state case. Starting a federal action "bars the commencement or continuation of an adjudicative proceeding before the commission in connection with the same claim," and transferring a request to the EEOC counts as starting a federal action (34A-5-107(16)). The UALD says a charge may be withdrawn and a Notice of Right to Sue requested from the EEOC; after that notice, a federal suit must be filed within 90 days (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1)). Weigh this choice with a lawyer, because it closes the state proceeding.
Common-law claims are preempted. In Gottling v. P.R. Inc., 2002 UT 95, 61 P.3d 989, the Utah Supreme Court held that "the UADA preempts all common law causes of action for discrimination, retaliation, or harassment by an employer on the basis of sex, race, color, pregnancy, age, religion, national origin, or disability." The result: an employee of an employer too small for the Act cannot sue in tort for a discrimination-based discharge. In Retherford v. AT&T Communications, 844 P.2d 949 (Utah 1992), the court held that at-will and contract employees can bring a tort for discharge in violation of public policy, but that the Act was the exclusive remedy for the sexual-harassment retaliation claim in that case.
What the UALD can award
After a hearing, a final order directs the employer to stop the practice and "provide relief to the complaining party, including: (i) reinstatement; (ii) back pay and benefits; (iii) attorney fees; and (iv) costs" (Utah Code 34A-5-107(8)(b)). For compensation discrimination, the order adds an amount equal to the back pay unless the employer shows good faith and reasonable grounds (34A-5-107(9)). The section contains no compensatory, emotional-distress or punitive damages and no front-pay provision. The presiding officer may also order a complaining party to reimburse a prevailing employer's attorney fees and costs (34A-5-107(7)(b)).
Compensatory and punitive damages require a federal claim. Under Title VII and the ADA they are capped at $50,000 to $300,000 combined, depending on employer size (42 U.S.C. 1981a(b)(3)); the wrongful termination guide has the tiers.
Federal discrimination charges in Utah
The EEOC's Phoenix District Office says an individual "usually has 300 days from the date of alleged harm to file a charge" against an employer with 15 or more employees for race, color, national origin, sex, religion or disability discrimination in Utah, and 300 days for age discrimination against an employer with 20 or more employees. For employers with fewer than 15 employees (fewer than 20 for age), it says charges "must be filed with the appropriate state agency within the time limits prescribed by state law," which it gives as 180 days in Utah, matching 34A-5-107(1)(c). Keep in mind that the UADA itself mostly reaches employers with 15 or more employees.
The public-policy exception
In Peterson v. Browning, 832 P.2d 1280 (Utah 1992), the Utah Supreme Court said "Utah recognizes the public policy exception to the at-will doctrine" and held "that the public policy exception applies in this state when the statutory language expressing the public conscience is clear and when the affected interests of society are substantial." The court described the typical categories as firings for "refusing to commit an illegal or wrongful act, (2) performing a public obligation, or (3) exercising a legal right or privilege."
Workers' compensation. In Touchard v. La-Z-Boy Inc., 2006 UT 71, 148 P.3d 945, the court held that "retaliatory discharge for filing a workers' compensation claim violates the public policy of this state," and that "an employee who has been fired or constructively discharged in retaliation for claiming workers' compensation benefits has a wrongful discharge cause of action." It declined to extend the claim to employees who suffered only harassment or discriminatory treatment. Since 2018, Utah Code 34A-2-114(2) also bars an employer from retaliating "solely because" an employee claims benefits, reports noncompliance or testifies. The Labor Commission may fine the employer up to $5,000 per violation, paid to the Uninsured Employers' Fund rather than the worker, and the section "does not affect the rights or obligations of an employee or employer under common law" (34A-2-114(3), (5)). For benefits, see Utah workers' compensation laws.
Firearms in a parking lot. In Hansen v. America Online, Inc., 2004 UT 62, 96 P.3d 950, the court affirmed summary judgment against employees fired for having firearms in a company parking lot, finding no clear and substantial public policy protecting that conduct on those facts. A later statute now limits parking-lot gun bans: Utah Code 34-45-103 says a person, including an employer, "may not establish, maintain, or enforce any policy or rule" that prohibits an individual from storing a firearm in a motor vehicle in a designated parking area if the individual may legally possess it, it is "locked securely in the motor vehicle" while unoccupied, and it is "not in plain view." An employer may still restrict firearms if it provides, reasonably nearby, alternative parking at no additional cost or "a secured and monitored storage location" (34-45-103(2)). School premises, religious organizations and government entities (which follow separate state firearms laws) are exempt, and a site subject to a federal firearm ban can qualify for an exemption by filing an undue-burden statement with the attorney general (34-45-107). An individual injured by a prohibited policy may sue for declaratory and injunctive relief and actual damages (34-45-105).
Deadline. No Utah statute names a deadline for the public-policy tort, and our research found no Utah case deciding which period applies. One candidate is Utah Code 78B-2-307(4), four years for an action "for relief not otherwise provided for by law." Get legal advice promptly rather than relying on the longer period.
Whistleblowing
Our research did not find a general Utah whistleblower statute for private employees. Private workers rely on the public-policy tort, which Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores (Utah 1998) says includes firings for "reporting to a public authority criminal activity of the employer" as well as for refusing to commit an illegal or wrongful act (Peterson), and on sector statutes: workplace safety (34A-6-203), workers' compensation (34A-2-114), wage complaints (34-28-19) and sexual harassment allegations (34A-5-114). Public employees have the Utah Protection of Public Employees Act, Title 67, Chapter 21. In Ray v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2015 UT 83, the court also recognized a narrow self-defense category, limited "to situations where an employee reasonably believes that force is necessary to defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily harm and the employee has no opportunity to withdraw." For more, see Utah whistleblower laws.
Other Utah firing protections
- Jury duty: an employer may not "deprive an employee of employment, threaten or take any adverse employment action" because of a jury summons or service. If discharged, "the employee within 30 days may bring a civil action for recovery of wages lost ... and for an order requiring the reinstatement" (Utah Code 78B-1-116(1), (4)). Lost wages are capped at six weeks, a prevailing employee recovers attorney fees, and the employer's violation is criminal contempt punishable by up to $500 or six months.
- Workplace safety (Utah OSH): an employee who believes he or she was discharged or discriminated against for exercising rights under Utah's occupational safety and health act must, "within 30 days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the division" (Utah Code 34A-6-203). The division may order the violation to stop, "which may include other appropriate relief, such as reinstatement of the employee to the employee's former position with back pay," and a party may request de novo review by the Division of Adjudication within 30 days.
- Wage complaints: an employer violates the Payment of Wages Act by discharging, demoting or retaliating because an employee files a wage complaint or testifies, is about to, or the employer believes the employee may (Utah Code 34-28-19). The Labor Commission may order the conduct to stop and award compensation that does not exceed lost wages and benefits. The section states no filing deadline.
- Voting: an employer "shall allow any voter to be absent ... for not more than two hours" to vote, if the voter applies for leave before election day, without deduction from usual pay; a violation is a class B misdemeanor (Utah Code 20A-3a-105). The section has no discharge-specific civil remedy.
- Military service: federal USERRA bars denying "retention in employment" because of military service (38 U.S.C. 4311(a)). Utah Code 71A-8-105 adds that a reserve member ordered to active duty, training or state active duty "shall, upon request, be granted a leave of absence from employment, but for no more than five years"; Utah National Guard and State Defense Force members ordered to state service by the governor "have the same rights and protections as provided by federal law for activation to federal military service"; and an employer who "willfully deprives" an absent member of the chapter's benefits is guilty of a class B misdemeanor.
- Emergency services volunteers: an employer with one or more workers "may not terminate the employment of an employee solely for being an emergency services volunteer" (a volunteer firefighter, a licensed emergency medical services volunteer or a posse member), or for being absent or late while "responding to an emergency" in that role (Utah Code 34-55-201(1), 34-55-102). The employee must make a reasonable effort to notify the employer, and the employer may reduce pay for the missed time (34-55-201(2), (4)). A fired employee may sue "within one year after the day on which the employer terminates the employee" for reinstatement or back wages (34-55-202).
- Subpoenaed witnesses: an employer "may not deprive an employee of employment or threaten or otherwise coerce the employee regarding employment because the employee attends a deposition or hearing in response to a subpoena" (Utah Code 78B-1-132(1)). The employee may sue for lost wages, capped at six weeks, and reinstatement, with attorney fees if the employee prevails, and the violation is criminal contempt (78B-1-132(2)-(3)). The section states no filing deadline.
Constructive discharge
Utah recognizes a claim when a worker is forced out. In Touchard, the Utah Supreme Court allowed a workers' compensation retaliation claim by an employee who was "fired or constructively discharged." The court agreed with the Utah Court of Appeals and held "that a resignation under working conditions that a reasonable employee would consider intolerable is equivalent to a termination," so the workers' compensation retaliation claim "extends to constructive discharge."
Contracts, handbooks and bad faith
The at-will presumption can be overcome by an express or implied contract term. In Berube, the court remanded for trial on "a theory of breach of an implied term of the employment contract." A handbook can also cut the other way: in Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores, Inc., 972 P.2d 395 (Utah 1998), the court held that "Ryan's receipt and acknowledgment of the handbook, which notified him of his at-will status, revoked any express or implied contractual conditions contradictory to the handbook."
Bad faith alone is not enough. In Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc., 812 P.2d 49 (Utah 1991), the court held that "The covenant of good faith recognized in Resource Management cannot be construed to change an indefinite-term, at-will employment contract into a contract that requires an employer to have good cause to justify a discharge." An oral contract claim carries a four-year limit (Utah Code 78B-2-307(1)(a)) and a written contract claim six years (78B-2-309(1)(b)).
A written reason or your personnel file
Our research did not locate a Utah statute requiring a private employer to give a written reason for a firing or to let a private employee inspect a personnel file. For timing of the last paycheck, see Utah final paycheck laws.
Wrongful termination deadlines in Utah
| Claim | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|
| UALD charge (UADA) | 180 days after the practice occurs; the UALD sends charges filed on days 181 to 300 to the EEOC | Utah Code 34A-5-107(1)(c); UALD page |
| Request for an evidentiary hearing after a UALD determination | 30 days | 34A-5-107(4)(c), (5)(c) |
| Jury-duty discharge lawsuit | 30 days | 78B-1-116(4) |
| Emergency services volunteer firing lawsuit | 1 year after the termination | 34-55-202(1) |
| Utah OSH safety-retaliation complaint | 30 days after the violation | 34A-6-203 |
| Public-policy tort (incl. workers' compensation retaliation) | No statute names one; 4-year catch-all is a candidate, no case read | 78B-2-307(4) |
| Oral contract | 4 years | 78B-2-307(1)(a) |
| Written contract | 6 years | 78B-2-309(1)(b) |
| EEOC charge, race, color, national origin, sex, religion or disability (employer with 15 or more employees) | Usually 300 days from the date of alleged harm | EEOC Phoenix District Office timeliness page |
| EEOC charge, age (employer with 20 or more employees) | 300 days from the date of alleged harm | EEOC Phoenix District Office timeliness page |
| Title VII lawsuit | 90 days after the EEOC Notice of Right to Sue | 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) |
| NLRB charge (protected concerted activity) | 6 months | 29 U.S.C. 160(b) |
| FMLA lawsuit | 2 years, or 3 years if willful | 29 U.S.C. 2617(c) |

Where to file in Utah
- State discrimination claims: the Utah Antidiscrimination and Labor Division of the Utah Labor Commission, within 180 days.
- Safety retaliation, wage retaliation and workers' compensation retaliation fines: the Utah Labor Commission's divisions under 34A-6-203, 34-28-19 and 34A-2-114.
- Federal discrimination claims: the EEOC, through its Public Portal, or at 1-800-669-4000 when a deadline is near.
- Public-policy tort, jury-duty and contract claims: directly in court.
Practical steps after a firing in Utah
Write down the date you were fired, who told you, the reason given, and any complaint, claim, report or jury summons involved, and keep the termination notice, reviews and the handbook. Watch the shortest clocks first: 30 days for a safety complaint or a jury-duty suit, then 180 days for a UALD charge. Before filing in federal court, ask a lawyer how that choice affects the state case under 34A-5-107(16).
If the employer offers money in exchange for a release, read it before signing, because a release can give up the claims described here. Our Utah severance pay laws page covers those agreements.
Recent changes
- 2026: amendments carried into 34A-5-114 took effect May 6, 2026 (Chapter 341, 2026 General Session), with a further version effective January 1, 2027 (Chapter 445); they change cross-references and definitions in the sexual-misconduct section, not the retaliation ban. H.B. 73 (2026), signed by the governor on March 17, 2026, widens the definition of retaliatory action for public employees under the Protection of Public Employees Act.
- 2025: S.B. 86, Workplace Protection Amendments, amended the definition of sexual harassment used in 34A-5-114 (34A-5-102 version effective May 7, 2025). The 15-employee threshold in 34A-5-102 did not change.
- No change in 2025 or 2026 to the UADA firing ban (34A-5-106), the 180-day deadline or the administrative-only remedy (34A-5-107).
Related
- Wrongful termination laws by state
- Utah at-will employment laws
- Utah whistleblower laws
- Utah workers' compensation laws
- Utah severance pay laws
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about Utah wrongful termination law (the at-will rule, the Utah Antidiscrimination Act, Utah Code 34A-5-101 and following, the public-policy tort, and related statutes such as 78B-1-116, 34A-2-114 and 34A-6-203) and the federal laws that apply in Utah. It is not legal advice. The information was verified on October 10, 2026. For advice about your situation, contact the Utah Antidiscrimination and Labor Division, the EEOC, a legal aid office or a lawyer licensed in Utah.
Last updated: October 10, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Utah an at-will employment state?
Yes. Utah employment is presumed at will, and the Utah Supreme Court held in Brehany v. Nordstrom (1991) that the covenant of good faith cannot turn an at-will job into one that requires good cause for a discharge. Statutes, contracts and the public-policy exception still limit firings.
Can I sue my employer in Utah court under the Antidiscrimination Act?
No. Utah Code 34A-5-107(15) makes the Act's administrative procedure the exclusive state-law remedy for employment discrimination. Court damages come through federal law, such as Title VII, after an EEOC charge.
What is the deadline to file a discrimination charge in Utah?
A request for agency action with the UALD must be filed within 180 days after the alleged discriminatory or prohibited employment practice occurs (Utah Code 34A-5-107(1)(c)). The UALD says charges filed after 180 days but within 300 days are sent to the EEOC.
How many employees does an employer need for the Utah Antidiscrimination Act to apply?
Fifteen or more employees within the state for each working day in each of 20 calendar weeks or more in the current or preceding calendar year (Utah Code 34A-5-102). The state and its political subdivisions are covered regardless of size.
Does Utah protect sexual orientation and gender identity at work?
Yes. Utah Code 34A-5-106 lists sexual orientation and gender identity for employers with 15 or more employees. Federal Title VII, as read in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), also bars firing someone for being gay or transgender at employers with 15 or more employees.
Can I be fired for filing a workers' compensation claim in Utah?
The Utah Supreme Court held in Touchard v. La-Z-Boy (2006) that retaliatory discharge for filing a workers' compensation claim violates Utah public policy. Utah Code 34A-2-114 also bars retaliation and lets the Labor Commission fine the employer up to $5,000 per violation, but the fine goes to a state fund, not the worker.
What is the statute of limitations for wrongful termination in Utah?
It depends on the claim. A UALD charge has 180 days and a jury-duty discharge suit 30 days. No statute names a deadline for the public-policy tort, and our research found no case deciding it; the four-year catch-all in Utah Code 78B-2-307(4) is one candidate, so get legal advice promptly.
Can I be fired for jury duty in Utah?
No. Utah Code 78B-1-116 bars adverse action because of a jury summons or service, and a discharged employee may sue within 30 days for lost wages (capped at six weeks) and reinstatement, with attorney fees to a prevailing employee.
Can a small Utah employer fire me for reporting sexual harassment?
Utah Code 34A-5-114 bars an employer of any size from retaliating against an employee for alleging sexual harassment or sexual assault, or for refusing a confidentiality clause about sexual misconduct as a condition of employment.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Utah Code, Title 34A: Utah Labor Code
§ 34A-5-106Discriminatory or prohibited employment practices -- Permitted practices.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) It is a discriminatory or prohibited employment practice to take an action described in Subsections (1)(a) through (g). (a) (i) An employer may not refuse to hire, promote, discharge, demote, or terminate a person, or to retaliate against, harass, or discriminate in matters of compensation or in terms, privileges, and conditions of employment against a person otherwise qualified, because of: (A) race; (B) color; (C) sex; (D) pregnancy, childbirth, or pregnancy-related conditions; (E) age, if the individual is 40 years of age or older; (F) religion; (G) national origin; (H) disability; (I) sexual orientation; or (J) gender identity. (ii) A person may not be considered "otherwise qualified," unless that person possesses the following required by an employer for any particular job, job classification, or position: (A) education; (B) training; (C) ability, with or without reasonable accommodation; (D) moral character; (E) integrity; (F) disposition to work; (G) adherence to reasonable rules and regulations; and (H) other job related qualifications required by an employer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Carter v. Labor Commission Appeals Board (Court of Appeals of Utah 2006, 566 Utah Adv. Rep. 27)“…n of Utah Code section 84A-5-106(1)(a)()(C) of the Act. See Utah Code Ann. § 34A-5-106(1)(a)()(C) (2005) ("An employer may not…”
- Buckner v. Kennard (Utah Supreme Court 2004, 508 Utah Adv. Rep. 26)“…idiscrimination Act prohibits certain employment practices. Utah Code Ann. § 34A-5-106 (2001). However, the exclusive remedy f…”
- Touchard v. La-Z-Boy Inc. (Utah Supreme Court 2006, 565 Utah Adv. Rep. 15)“…national origin, sex, religion, pregnancy, or disability, Utah Code Ann. § 34A-5-106 (2005) (prohibiting employers from maki…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
§ 34A-5-107Procedure for aggrieved person to file claim -- Investigations -- Adjudicative proceedings -- Settlement -- Reconsideration -- Determination.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) (a) A person claiming to be aggrieved by a discriminatory or prohibited employment practice may, or that person's attorney or agent may, make, sign, and file with the division a request for agency action. (b) A request for agency action shall be verified under oath or affirmation. (c) A request for agency action made under this section shall be filed within 180 days after the alleged discriminatory or prohibited employment practice occurs. (d) The division may transfer a request for agency action filed with the division pursuant to this section to the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in accordance with a work-share agreement that is: (i) between the division and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; and (ii) in effect on the day on which the request for agency action is transferred. (2) An employer, labor organization, joint apprenticeship committee, or vocational school who has an employee or member who refuses or threatens to refuse to comply with this chapter may file with the division a request for agency action asking the division for assistance to obtain the employee's or member's compliance by conciliation or other remedial action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Christensen v. Labor Commission (Court of Appeals of Utah 2023, 536 P.3d 1114)“…emedies ordered by the Board, which require us to interpret Utah Code section 34A-5-107(8), addressing remedies under the UAA.…”
- Buckner v. Kennard (Utah Supreme Court 2004, 508 Utah Adv. Rep. 26)“…r back pay as a remedy that the Labor Division may require. Utah Code Ann. § 34A-5-107(9)(b) (2001). But the CPMA contains no…”
- Gottling v. P.R. Inc. (Utah Supreme Court 2002, 456 Utah Adv. Rep. 14)“…therefore must include discrimination by small firms. See Utah Code Ann. § 34A-5-107(15) (2001). This is incorrect. The stat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 34A-5-102Definitions -- Unincorporated entities -- Joint employers -- Franchisors.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) As used in this chapter: (a) "Affiliate" means the same as that term is defined in Section 16-6a-102. (b) "Apprenticeship" means a program for the training of apprentices including a program providing the training of those persons defined as apprentices by Section 35A-6-102. (c) "Bona fide occupational qualification" means a characteristic applying to an employee that: (i) is necessary to the operation; or (ii) is the essence of the employee's employer's business. (d) "Court" means a court with jurisdiction under Title 78A, Judiciary and Judicial Administration. (e) "Director" means the director of the division. (f) "Disability" means a physical or mental disability as defined and covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12102. (g) "Division" means the Division of Antidiscrimination and Labor. (h) "Employee" means a person applying with or employed by an employer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Christensen v. Labor Commission (Utah Supreme Court 2025, 2025 UT 55)“…ause the employee opposed a prohibited employment practice, UTAH CODE §§ 34A-5-102(1)(y), -106-(1)(a)(i) (emphasis added),…”
- Gottling v. P.R. Inc. (Utah Supreme Court 2002, 456 Utah Adv. Rep. 14)“…loyer of fifteen or more employees (large employers). See Utah Code Ann. §§ 34A-5-102(8)(a)(iv) (defining “employer” for the…”
- Viktron/Lika v. Labor Commission (Court of Appeals of Utah 2001, 436 Utah Adv. Rep. 44)“…ected opposition" for purposes of a retaliation claim under Utah Code Ann. §§ 34A-5-102(17), -106 (Supp.2000), of the Utah Anti…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 34A-5-114Limitations on enforceability of nondisclosure and non-disparagement clauses -- Retaliation prohibited.In force
(1) As used in this section: (a) "Confidentiality clause" means a nondisclosure clause or a non-disparagement clause. (b) "Employee" means a current or a former employee. (c) "Non-compete agreement" means the same as that term is defined in Section 34-51-102. (d) "Nondisclosure clause" means an agreement between an employee and employer that prevents, or has the effect of preventing, an employee from disclosing or discussing: (i) sexual assault; (ii) allegations of sexual assault; (iii) sexual harassment; or (iv) allegations of sexual harassment. (e) "Non-disparagement clause" means an agreement between an employee and employer that prohibits, or has the effect of prohibiting, an employee from making a negative statement that is: (i) about the employer; and (ii) related to: (A) a claim of sexual assault or sexual harassment; (B) a sexual assault dispute; or (C) a sexual harassment dispute. (f) "Proprietary information" means an employer's business plan or customer information.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 34A-2-114Unlawful interference -- Penalties.In force
(1) An employer may not knowingly or intentionally: (a) impede or diminish an employee's efforts to make a claim or receive workers' compensation benefits under this chapter or Chapter 3, Utah Occupational Disease Act; or (b) intimidate, coerce, or harass an employee with the intent of preventing the employee from making a claim or receiving workers' compensation benefits under this chapter or Chapter 3, Utah Occupational Disease Act. (2) An employer may not suspend, discharge, discipline, threaten to discharge or discipline, or otherwise retaliate against an employee solely because the employee: (a) claims or attempts to claim workers' compensation benefits under this chapter or Chapter 3, Utah Occupational Disease Act; (b) reports an employer's noncompliance with a provision of this chapter or Chapter 3, Utah Occupational Disease Act; or (c) testifies or intends to testify in a workers' compensation proceeding. (3) In accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 4, Administrative Procedures Act, the division may impose a fine of up to $5,000 against an employer for each violation of Subsection (1) or (2).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 34A-6-203Discharge or retaliation against employee prohibited.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A person may not discharge or in any way retaliate against an employee because the employee: (a) files a complaint or institutes or causes to be instituted a proceeding under or related to this chapter; (b) testifies or is about to testify in any proceeding under or related to this chapter; or (c) exercises a right granted by this chapter on behalf of the employee or others. (2) (a) An employee who believes that the employee has been discharged or otherwise retaliated against by any person in violation of this section may, within 30 days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the division alleging discharge or retaliation in violation of this section. (b) (i) Upon receipt of the complaint, the division shall cause an investigation to be made. (ii) The division may employ investigators as necessary to carry out the purpose of this Subsection (2).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Graham v. Albertsons (Utah Supreme Court 2020, 2020 UT 15)“…ating against an employee for filing a UOSHA complaint. See UTAH CODE § 34A-6-203. ¶3 The Division found Albertson‘s…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Utah Code, Title 78B: Judicial Code
§ 78B-1-116Jurors -- Employer not to discharge or threaten employee for jury service -- Criminal penalty -- Civil action by employee.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) An employer may not deprive an employee of employment, threaten or take any adverse employment action, or otherwise coerce the employee regarding employment because the employee receives a summons, responds to it, serves as a juror, or a grand juror, or attends court for prospective jury or grand jury service. (2) An employee may not be required or requested to use annual, vacation, or sick leave for time spent responding to a summons for jury duty, time spent participating in the jury selection process, or for time spent actually serving on a jury. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to require an employer to provide annual, vacation, or sick leave to employees under the provisions of this statute who otherwise are not entitled to those benefits under company policies. (3) Any employer who violates this section is guilty of criminal contempt and upon conviction may be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Also relied on in: Jury Duty Laws by State (2026): Exemptions, Pay, Job Protection, Utah Jury Duty Laws: Pay, Excuses and Employer Rules (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Utah Code 34A-5-106, discriminatory or prohibited employment practices(le.utah.gov).gov
- Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd., 771 P.2d 1033 (Utah 1989)(static.case.law)
- Utah Code 34A-5-102, definitions (version effective May 7, 2025)(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Labor Commission, UALD Employment Discrimination(laborcommission.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34A-5-112, religious liberty and expression(le.utah.gov).gov
- Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), slip opinion(www.supremecourt.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e (Title VII definitions, employer threshold)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Utah Code 34A-5-114 (version effective May 6, 2026)(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34A-5-107, procedure and remedies(le.utah.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5 (Title VII enforcement, 90-day suit deadline)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Gottling v. P.R. Inc., 2002 UT 95, 61 P.3d 989(static.case.law)
- Retherford v. AT&T Communications, 844 P.2d 949 (Utah 1992)(static.case.law)
- 42 U.S.C. 1981a (damages caps)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- EEOC Phoenix District Office, Timeliness(www.eeoc.gov).gov
- Peterson v. Browning, 832 P.2d 1280 (Utah 1992)(static.case.law)
- Touchard v. La-Z-Boy Inc., 2006 UT 71, 148 P.3d 945(static.case.law)
- Utah Code 34A-2-114, workers' compensation retaliation(le.utah.gov).gov
- Hansen v. America Online, Inc., 2004 UT 62, 96 P.3d 950(static.case.law)
- Utah Code 78B-2-307, four-year limitations(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34A-6-203, Utah OSH discrimination complaints(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-28-19, Payment of Wages Act retaliation(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 78B-1-116, jury service protections(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 20A-3a-105, time off to vote(le.utah.gov).gov
- 38 U.S.C. 4311 (USERRA)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores, Inc., 972 P.2d 395 (Utah 1998)(static.case.law)
- Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc., 812 P.2d 49 (Utah 1991)(static.case.law)
- 29 U.S.C. 160 (NLRB unfair labor practice charges)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 2617 (FMLA enforcement and limitations)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- EEOC, How to File a Charge of Employment Discrimination(www.eeoc.gov).gov
- Utah S.B. 111 (2026), enrolled copy(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah H.B. 73 (2026), Public Employee Retaliatory Action Amendments, enrolled copy(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah S.B. 86 (2025), Workplace Protection Amendments, enrolled copy(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-45-103, firearms in vehicles in parking areas(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-45-105, cause of action for noncompliance(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-45-107, exemptions(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 71A-8-105, reserve members: leave and employer liability(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-55-201, emergency services volunteers: prohibition on termination(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-55-202, civil action for violation(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-55-102, definitions (Emergency Services Volunteer Employment Protection Act)(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 78B-1-132, employer not to discharge employee for responding to subpoena(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34A-5-102.5, supremacy over local regulations(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Legislature, H.B. 73 (2026) bill status(le.utah.gov).gov
- Ray v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2015 UT 83, 359 P.3d 614(static.case.law)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.