New Jersey
Wrongful Termination in New Jersey (2026): Laws and Deadlines
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 10, 2026). · 27 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New Jersey is an employment-at-will state, so a firing is wrongful only when it breaks a specific law, a contract or handbook promise, or a clear mandate of public policy. The main statute is the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 et seq., which makes it an unlawful employment practice under N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(a) for an employer "to bar or to discharge" someone because of a protected trait.
The LAD covers employers of every size, and you can sue in Superior Court without filing with the Division on Civil Rights first; filing with the Division first can close the court route (N.J.S.A. 10:5-27). To compare other states, see our guide to wrongful termination laws by state.
Information last verified on October 10, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers New Jersey law on firing employees: the Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5), the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (N.J.S.A. 34:19), the Pierce and Woolley decisions, and the state statutes on workers' compensation, jury service, sick leave, family leave and wage complaints, with short notes on the federal laws that also apply. The federal rules in full are on our wrongful termination laws by state guide. It does not cover severance agreements; see New Jersey severance pay laws.
Source note: The New Jersey Legislature's statute server could not be reached during our October 2026 research. The Law Against Discrimination text quoted here matches the Division on Civil Rights' published copy of the statute (current through October 18, 2024) and the Legislature's compiled text retrieved August 1, 2026. N.J.S.A. 43:21-55.2 and 34:11B-3 were checked in the 2025 chapter law (P.L.2025, c.279). CEPA and the other statutes quoted (including N.J.S.A. 34:15-39.1, 2B:20-17, 34:11D-4 and 34:11B-9) come from the compiled text retrieved August 1, 2026. We could not confirm that no other change took effect after those dates; check the current text before relying on it.
Is New Jersey an at-will state?
Yes, but with major limits. In Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 84 N.J. 58 (1980), the New Jersey Supreme Court held "that an employee has a cause of action for wrongful discharge when the discharge is contrary to a clear mandate of public policy." In Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 99 N.J. 284 (1985), it held that a handbook promise of for-cause firing can be enforced.
Our research found no New Jersey statute requiring just cause for private-sector firings; civil-service and union protections were outside its scope. For how the doctrine works day to day, see New Jersey at-will employment laws.
Grounds for a wrongful termination claim in New Jersey
Discrimination under the Law Against Discrimination
N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(a) makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to "refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge or require to retire" an individual because of any of these traits:
- race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry or nationality;
- age;
- marital status, civil union status or domestic partnership status;
- affectional or sexual orientation, sex, and gender identity or expression;
- pregnancy or breastfeeding;
- disability, genetic information, or atypical hereditary cellular or blood trait, and refusing to submit to a genetic test or share its results;
- service in the Armed Forces of the United States or liability for service.
Because the LAD names sexual orientation and gender identity or expression, it reaches farther than federal law. Federal Title VII also bars these firings at employers with 15 or more employees: in Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court held that "An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII."
Who is covered. The LAD has no minimum headcount. Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(e), "employer" includes all persons as defined in 10:5-5(a) (individuals, partnerships, associations, corporations and others), "hiring entities" as defined in the misclassification law enacted by P.L.2023, c.262 (C.34:11-70), and the State, its political subdivisions and public agencies.
Retaliation. N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(d) bars reprisals against anyone who opposed a practice the LAD forbids, sought legal advice, shared information with counsel or a governmental entity, or filed a complaint, testified or assisted in a proceeding.
Pay discussions. N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(r) bars reprisals for discussing or disclosing pay information. For violations of subsection r. or t., N.J.S.A. 10:5-13(a)(2)(d) provides treble monetary damages.
Disparate impact rules. The Division on Civil Rights adopted N.J.A.C. 13:16, Disparate Impact Discrimination, as new rules under the LAD "effective December 15, 2025."
Wrongful discharge in violation of public policy (Pierce)
Pierce also set out where public policy comes from: "The sources of public policy include legislation; administrative rules, regulations or decisions; and judicial decisions. In certain instances, a professional code of ethics may contain an expression of public policy."
No statute sets a specific deadline for a Pierce claim, and our research did not find a decision fixing one. Courts decide which general limitations period applies, so get legal advice promptly. CEPA's waiver rule, described below, can also affect whether a Pierce claim survives alongside a CEPA suit.
Handbooks and implied contracts (Woolley)
Woolley held: "absent a clear and prominent disclaimer, an implied promise contained in an employment manual that an employee will be fired only for cause may be enforceable against an employer even when the employment is for an indefinite term and would otherwise be terminable at will." Whether a particular handbook makes such a promise, and whether its disclaimer is clear and prominent, depends on the document.
Our research did not cover whether New Jersey implies a covenant of good faith and fair dealing into at-will employment, so this page states no rule on it.
Whistleblowing (CEPA)
The Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. 34:19-3, bars retaliatory action because an employee:
- discloses or threatens to disclose to a supervisor or a public body an activity, policy or practice the employee "reasonably believes" violates a law or rule, or is fraudulent or criminal;
- provides information to, or testifies before, a public body investigating such a violation; or
- objects to or refuses to take part in such an activity, including one "incompatible with a clear mandate of public policy concerning the public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment."
Under N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, a disclosure to a public body generally requires prior written notice to a supervisor, with exceptions. Under N.J.S.A. 34:19-5, "an aggrieved employee or former employee may, within one year, institute a civil action." A jury trial is available, along with all remedies available in common-law tort actions, reinstatement, benefits, lost wages, costs and attorney's fees, punitive damages, and a civil fine of up to $10,000 for a first violation and $20,000 for each later one.
The waiver trap. N.J.S.A. 34:19-8 provides that "the institution of an action in accordance with this act shall be deemed a waiver of the rights and remedies available under any other contract, collective bargaining agreement, State law, rule or regulation or under the common law." Choosing between CEPA, the LAD and a Pierce claim on the same facts is a decision to make with a lawyer. More detail is on our New Jersey whistleblower laws page.
Other firing bans in New Jersey law
| Protected activity | Rule | Deadline and remedy | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workers' compensation | Unlawful to discharge or discriminate because an employee "has claimed or attempted to claim workmen's compensation benefits" or testified | Fine of $100 to $1,000, up to 60 days in jail, or both; the employee is to be restored to employment and compensated for lost wages unless no longer qualified; no deadline stated in the section | N.J.S.A. 34:15-39.1 |
| Jury service | Retaliation for jury service is barred; an employer violation is a disorderly persons offense | Action "within 90 days from the date of the violation or the completion of jury service, whichever is later"; economic damages, reinstatement and a reasonable attorney's fee to a prevailing employee | N.J.S.A. 2B:20-17 |
| Earned sick leave | No retaliation for requesting or using earned sick leave | Rebuttable presumption of retaliation if adverse action comes within 90 days of protected activity; remedies borrowed from the State Wage and Hour Law | N.J.S.A. 34:11D-4 |
| Family leave (NJFLA; employers with 15 or more employees since July 17, 2026, 30 before) | Unlawful to interfere with leave rights or to discharge for opposing an unlawful practice or filing or testifying | Superior Court suit or Division complaint (a Division complaint within 180 days); LAD remedies plus punitive damages up to $10,000; no court deadline stated in the act | N.J.S.A. 34:11B-9, 34:11B-11 |
| Temporary disability and family leave insurance benefits | No discharge or retaliation for requesting or taking benefits | Superior Court action with all common-law tort remedies, reinstatement, lost wages, costs and attorney's fees; fine of $1,000 to $2,000 for a first violation; no deadline stated | N.J.S.A. 43:21-55.2 (P.L.2019, c.37, as amended by P.L.2025, c.279) |
| Wage complaints | No retaliation for complaining about wages or telling coworkers about their wage rights; adverse action within 90 days of a complaint to the commissioner or a wage lawsuit is presumed retaliatory | Civil action for lost wages plus up to 200 percent liquidated damages, costs and fees, within 6 years; also a disorderly persons offense with fines of $500 to $1,000 for a first violation and an order to offer reinstatement | N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a24, 34:11-56a25, 34:11-56a25.1; 34:11-4.10 |
| Domestic or sexual violence leave (NJ SAFE Act; employers with 25 or more employees; employees with 12 months and 1,000 hours of work) | No discharge or retaliation for taking or requesting up to 20 days of unpaid leave in a 12-month period related to domestic violence or a sexually violent offense against the employee or a family member | Superior Court action within 1 year; common-law tort remedies, reinstatement, lost wages, costs and fees, and civil fines of $1,000 to $2,000 for a first violation and up to $5,000 for later ones; the suit is the sole remedy | N.J.S.A. 34:11C-2 to 34:11C-5 |
| Off-duty cannabis use | No discharge because a person does or does not use cannabis items, or solely for cannabinoid metabolites from lawful use; employers may still test on reasonable suspicion of use at work, after a work accident, randomly or pre-employment, with a physical evaluation of impairment | No deadline stated | N.J.S.A. 24:6I-52 |
| Off-duty tobacco use | No discharge for smoking or not smoking, unless the employer has a rational basis reasonably related to the employment | No deadline stated | N.J.S.A. 34:6B-1 |
| Military service (state reemployment law) | A private employer must restore a returning service member who applies within 90 days of release (10 days after training of up to three months), unless circumstances make it impossible or unreasonable | Superior Court complaint; lost wages and benefits; federal USERRA also applies | N.J.S.A. 38:23C-20 |
| Hazardous-substance right-to-know rights | No discharge for exercising rights under the Worker and Community Right to Know Act | Complaint to the Commissioner of Labor within 30 days of the violation or of learning of it | N.J.S.A. 34:5A-17 |
| Public-employee safety complaints (PEOSH) | No discharge for filing safety complaints or taking part in proceedings | Complaint to the commissioner within 180 days of learning of the violation; reinstatement and back pay | N.J.S.A. 34:6A-45 |
Our research found no New Jersey statute giving time off to vote.
Deadlines for New Jersey wrongful termination claims
| Claim | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Division on Civil Rights (or municipal office) complaint | 180 days after the alleged act of discrimination | N.J.S.A. 10:5-18 |
| LAD lawsuit in Superior Court | 2 years; no agency filing or right-to-sue letter needed | N.J.S.A. 10:5-13(a)(2); N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2; Montells v. Haynes |
| EEOC charge (15 or more employees; 20 or more for age) | 300 days from the date of alleged harm | EEOC Newark, New York and Philadelphia office pages |
| Federal lawsuit after an EEOC Notice of Right to Sue | 90 days | 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) |
| CEPA whistleblower suit | 1 year | N.J.S.A. 34:19-5 |
| Jury-service retaliation | 90 days from the violation or the end of jury service, whichever is later | N.J.S.A. 2B:20-17 |
| NJ SAFE Act (domestic or sexual violence leave) suit | 1 year from the violation | N.J.S.A. 34:11C-5 |
| Pierce public-policy claim | No statute sets a specific deadline; see a lawyer promptly | No source fixes it |
| OSHA safety retaliation complaint | 30 days | 29 U.S.C. 660(c)(2) |
| NLRB charge (protected concerted activity) | 6 months | 29 U.S.C. 160(b) |
| Federal FMLA lawsuit | 2 years (3 years if willful) | 29 U.S.C. 2617(c) |

On the LAD court deadline: Montells v. Haynes, 133 N.J. 282 (1993), framed the question this way: "Because LAD does not contain its own statute of limitations for Superior Court actions, the issue is whether the six-year general statute of limitations ... or the two-year personal-injury statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, should apply." The Court applied the two-year statute, which requires an action "within two years next after the cause of any such action shall have accrued." A proposal to lengthen that period was reported, but our research found no enacted change.
The EEOC says "the deadline usually applies to each event," so a demotion and a later firing can carry separate deadlines.
Where to file in New Jersey
The Division on Civil Rights. The New Jersey Division on Civil Rights, in the Office of the Attorney General, enforces the LAD. Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-18, "Any complaint filed in the division or in any municipal office pursuant to this act must be so filed within 180 days after the alleged act of discrimination." The Division starts complaints through an intake form on its NJ Bias Investigation Access System (NJBIAS) or by phone at 1-833-NJDCR4U.

The EEOC. Three EEOC offices list New Jersey: Newark, New York and Philadelphia. Each says an individual has 300 days from the date of alleged harm to file a charge against an employer with 15 or more employees (race, color, national origin, sex, religion or disability), or 20 or more for age. For smaller employers, they say charges go to the state agency within 180 days in New Jersey, which matches N.J.S.A. 10:5-18. Charges start through the EEOC Public Portal.
The EEOC says a charge filed with either the EEOC or a state fair employment practices agency "also will be automatically filed with the other agency." Our research did not confirm the Division's work-sharing arrangement, so ask both agencies how a filing with one is treated by the other.
Division on Civil Rights or Superior Court?
New Jersey lets you choose. Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-13(a)(2), a complainant "may initiate suit in Superior Court ... without first filing a complaint with the division or any municipal office," and "a jury trial shall be directed" on any party's application. There is no right-to-sue letter for the state claim.
The routes interact:
- A court suit pauses the agency route. "Prosecution of such suit in Superior Court ... shall bar the filing of a complaint with the division" while the suit is pending.
- A Division complaint is exclusive while it is pending. Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-27, the Division's procedure, "while pending, be exclusive; and the final determination therein shall exclude any other action, civil or criminal, based on the same grievance." The Division says you may withdraw a complaint to file in Superior Court within the 2-year limitations period, so long as it has not issued a finding of no probable cause; after such a finding, the only route is an appeal to the Appellate Division within 45 days of being served with it.
- An agency case can move to a hearing. Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-13(b), at any time after 180 days from filing with the Division, a complainant may ask the Division to transfer the matter to the Office of Administrative Law, unless the Division found no probable cause or dismissed it.
- A CEPA suit waives other claims. Filing under CEPA waives state-law and common-law rights on the same matter (N.J.S.A. 34:19-8).
- Federal claims need a charge. A federal Title VII or ADA suit requires an EEOC charge first and a lawsuit within 90 days of the Notice of Right to Sue (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1)).
What a court can award under the LAD
N.J.S.A. 10:5-13(a)(2)(b) provides that "All remedies available in common law tort actions shall be available to prevailing plaintiffs," plus injunctive relief under N.J.S.A. 10:5-17. The legislative findings in N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 state that these harms have "given rise to legal remedies, including compensatory and punitive damages. The Legislature intends that such damages be available to all persons protected by this act."
On fees, N.J.S.A. 10:5-27.1 provides that "the prevailing party may be awarded a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the cost, provided however, that no attorney's fee shall be awarded to the respondent unless there is a determination that the complainant brought the charge in bad faith." Separately, the Division's director may set civil penalties of up to $10,000, $25,000 or $50,000 depending on prior violations (N.J.S.A. 10:5-14.1a).
The LAD sections our research reviewed state no damages cap. Our research did not cover how New Jersey's general punitive-damages statute interacts with LAD awards. Federal Title VII and ADA claims carry combined compensatory and punitive caps of $50,000 to $300,000 by employer size (42 U.S.C. 1981a(b)(3)); the hub explains them.
Constructive discharge
Quitting can count as a firing. In Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center, 174 N.J. 1 (2002), the Supreme Court wrote: "Generally, a constructive discharge under the LAD occurs when an employer knowingly permit[s] conditions of discrimination in employment so intolerable that a reasonable person subject to them would resign." It requires "more egregious conduct than that sufficient for a hostile work environment claim," and the employee must do what is necessary and reasonable to remain employed.
Personnel files and reasons for firing
Our research found no New Jersey private-sector statute requiring an employer to state the reason for a firing, and it did not research a personnel-file access rule, so this page states none. For pay owed at separation, see New Jersey final paycheck laws.
Recent and pending changes in New Jersey
- Family leave threshold (P.L.2025, c.279). Approved January 17, 2026 and in effect since July 17, 2026 (six months after enactment), the act lowers the New Jersey Family Leave Act's employer threshold from 30 to 15 employees and amends N.J.S.A. 43:21-55.2, the 2019 provision that bars retaliation for requesting or taking temporary disability or family leave insurance benefits and requires reinstatement after that leave. Earlier drafts that would have stepped the threshold down to 10 and then 5 employees were not in the enacted version.
- Disparate impact rules (effective December 15, 2025). The Division adopted N.J.A.C. 13:16 under the LAD.
- A605 (2026-2027 session), pending, not law. The bill would codify LAD protection against disparate impact. Its status on the Legislature's site: "1/13/2026 Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary Committee."
Practical steps after a firing in New Jersey
Write down the dates, who said what, and the reason you were given, and keep copies of reviews, messages and pay records. Note the shortest state clocks that may apply: 90 days for jury-service retaliation, 180 days for a Division complaint and one year for CEPA.
If the employer offers money for a release, read it before signing: a release can give up the claims described here. N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.8 makes non-disclosure provisions that conceal the details of discrimination, retaliation or harassment claims "against public policy and unenforceable against a current or former employee." Our New Jersey severance pay laws page covers those agreements, and the wrongful termination guide has more on preparing a claim.
If you lost your job in a mass layoff or a transfer or termination of operations affecting 50 or more employees, and the employer has 100 or more employees, New Jersey's WARN law (N.J.S.A. 34:21-2) requires 90 days' notice and mandatory severance of one week of pay per full year of employment, plus four extra weeks if notice was short. A waiver of that severance is not effective unless the commissioner or a court approves it.
Related
- Wrongful termination laws by state
- New Jersey at-will employment laws
- New Jersey whistleblower laws
- New Jersey final paycheck laws
- New Jersey severance pay laws
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about New Jersey wrongful termination law (the Law Against Discrimination, the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, the Pierce, Woolley, Montells and Shepherd decisions, and N.J.S.A. 34:15-39.1, 2B:20-17, 34:11D-4, 34:11B-9 and 43:21-55.2) and the federal laws that apply in New Jersey. It is not legal advice. The information was verified on October 10, 2026, with statute text as compiled on August 1, 2026. For advice about your situation, contact the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights, the EEOC, a legal aid office or a lawyer licensed in New Jersey.
Last updated: October 10, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue for wrongful termination in New Jersey?
Only when the firing broke a specific law, a contract or handbook promise, or a clear mandate of public policy. The main routes are the LAD (N.J.S.A. 10:5-12), CEPA (N.J.S.A. 34:19-3), the Pierce public-policy claim and the Woolley implied-contract claim.
Do I have to file with the Division on Civil Rights before suing in New Jersey?
No. N.J.S.A. 10:5-13(a)(2) lets a complainant start a suit in Superior Court without first filing with the Division or a municipal office, and a jury trial is available on request. While that suit is pending, you cannot file a Division complaint on the same matter. The reverse also holds: a Division complaint is exclusive while it is pending, and the Division's final determination bars a later court action on the same grievance (N.J.S.A. 10:5-27).
How long do I have to file a discrimination claim in New Jersey?
A Division on Civil Rights complaint must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act (N.J.S.A. 10:5-18). A Superior Court suit under the LAD carries the two-year period of N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, as the Supreme Court applied it in Montells v. Haynes (1993).
What is the deadline for a CEPA whistleblower lawsuit?
One year. Under N.J.S.A. 34:19-5, an aggrieved employee or former employee may institute a civil action within one year.
Does the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination apply to small employers?
Yes. The LAD sets no minimum headcount; employer includes all persons as defined in the Act, plus the State and its political subdivisions (N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(e)). Federal Title VII starts at 15 employees and federal age law at 20.
Is there a cap on damages under the New Jersey LAD?
The LAD sections our research reviewed state no cap. N.J.S.A. 10:5-13(a)(2)(b) makes all common-law tort remedies available, N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 refers to compensatory and punitive damages, and N.J.S.A. 10:5-27.1 allows a reasonable attorney's fee to the prevailing party.
Can I be fired for discussing my pay in New Jersey?
N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(r) bars reprisals for discussing or disclosing pay information, and N.J.S.A. 10:5-13(a)(2)(d) provides treble monetary damages for violations of that subsection.
What is constructive discharge under New Jersey law?
In Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center (2002), the Supreme Court said it generally occurs when an employer knowingly permits conditions of discrimination so intolerable that a reasonable person would resign, which requires more egregious conduct than a hostile work environment claim.
Can a severance agreement keep me quiet about discrimination in New Jersey?
N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.8 makes non-disclosure provisions that conceal the details of discrimination, retaliation or harassment claims against public policy and unenforceable against a current or former employee.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New Jersey Statutes (Unannotated)
§ 10:5-12Unlawful employment practices, discrimination.In force
11. It shall be an unlawful employment practice, or, as the case may be, an unlawful discrimination: a. For an employer, because of the race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, civil union status, domestic partnership status, affectional or sexual orientation, genetic information, pregnancy or breastfeeding, sex, gender identity or expression, disability, or atypical hereditary cellular or blood trait of any individual, or because of an individual’s service in the Armed Forces of the United States or liability for service in the Armed Forces of the United States or the nationality of any individual, or because of the refusal to submit to a genetic test or make available the results of a genetic test to an employer, to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge or require to retire, unless justified by lawful considerations other than age, from employment such individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment; provided, however, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice to refuse to accept for employment an applicant who has received a notice of induction or orders…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at lis.njleg.state.nj.us
§ 10:5-13Filing complaints, prosecution; jury trial; remedies; damages.In force
12. a. (1) Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful employment practice or an unlawful discrimination may, personally or by an attorney-at-law, make, sign, and file with the division a verified complaint in writing which shall state the name and address of the person, employer, labor organization, employment agency, owner, lessee, proprietor, manager, superintendent, or agent alleged to have committed the unlawful employment practice or unlawful discrimination complained of and which shall set forth the particulars thereof and shall contain such other information as may be required by the division. Upon receipt of the complaint, the division shall notify the complainant on a form promulgated by the director of the division and approved by the Attorney General of the complainant's rights under P.L.1945, c.169 (C.10:5-1 et seq.), including the right to file a complaint in the Superior Court to be heard before a jury; of the jurisdictional limitations of the division; and any other provisions of P.L.1945, c.169 (C.10:5-1 et seq.), without interpretation, that may apply to the complaint.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at lis.njleg.state.nj.us
§ 10:5-18Rules of practice; limitationsIn force
The Attorney General shall establish rules of practice to govern, expedite and effectuate the foregoing procedure and his own actions thereunder. Any complaint filed in the division or in any municipal office pursuant to this act must be so filed within 180 days after the alleged act of discrimination.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at lis.njleg.state.nj.us
§ 34:19-5Civil action, jury trial; remedies.In force
5. Upon a violation of any of the provisions of this act, an aggrieved employee or former employee may, within one year, institute a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction. Upon the application of any party, a jury trial shall be directed to try the validity of any claim under this act specified in the suit. All remedies available in common law tort actions shall be available to prevailing plaintiffs. These remedies are in addition to any legal or equitable relief provided by this act or any other statute. The court shall also order, where appropriate and to the fullest extent possible: a. An injunction to restrain any violation of this act which is continuing at the time that the court issues its order; b. The reinstatement of the employee to the same position held before the retaliatory action, or to an equivalent position; c. The reinstatement of full fringe benefits and seniority rights; d. The compensation for all lost wages, benefits and other remuneration; and e. The payment by the employer of reasonable costs, and attorney's fees.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at lis.njleg.state.nj.us
§ 34:19-3Retaliatory action prohibited.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
3. An employer shall not take any retaliatory action against an employee because the employee does any of the following: a. Discloses, or threatens to disclose to a supervisor or to a public body an activity, policy or practice of the employer, or another employer, with whom there is a business relationship, that the employee reasonably believes: (1) is in violation of a law, or a rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to law, including any violation involving deception of, or misrepresentation to, any shareholder, investor, client, patient, customer, employee, former employee, retiree or pensioner of the employer or any governmental entity, or, in the case of an employee who is a licensed or certified health care professional, reasonably believes constitutes improper quality of patient care; or (2) is fraudulent or criminal, including any activity, policy or practice of deception or misrepresentation which the employee reasonably believes may defraud any shareholder, investor, client, patient, customer, employee, former employee, retiree or pensioner of the employer or any governmental entity; b. Provides information to, or testifies before, any public body…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at lis.njleg.state.nj.us
Cited in 259 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dzwonar v. McDevitt (Supreme Court of New Jersey 2003, 177 N.J. 451)“…ety or welfare or protection of the environment. [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.] A plaintiff who brings a cause…”
- Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of Education (Supreme Court of New Jersey 1994, 138 N.J. 405)“…pervisor within the meaning of the statute" as required by N.J.S.A. 34:19-3a. The Appellate Division unanimously…”
- Young v. Schering Corp. (Supreme Court of New Jersey 1995, 141 N.J. 16)“…e averments do not set forth a cause of action under N.J.S.A. 34:19-3a [and] c(l) or c(3) of CEPA. What Young…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Jersey Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report, New Jersey At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights
§ 10:5-27.1Attorney fees.In force
6. In any action or proceeding brought under P.L.1945, c.169 (C.10:5-1 et seq.), the prevailing party may be awarded a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the cost, provided however, that no attorney's fee shall be awarded to the respondent unless there is a determination that the complainant brought the charge in bad faith. If the complainant's case was initiated by a housing authority on behalf of a tenant for a violation of paragraph (4) of subsection g. or paragraph (4) of subsection h. of section 11 of P.L.1945, c.169 (C.10:5-12) and the complainant prevailed, reasonable costs, including attorney fees, of the housing authority may be assessed against a nonprevailing respondent. If the complainant's case was presented by the attorney for the division and the complainant prevailed, the reasonable costs, including attorney fees, of such representation may be assessed against a nonprevailing respondent. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, an award of an attorney's fee in accordance with this section shall not be available as a remedy to violations of section 2 of P.L.2019, c.199 (C.10:4-12.12).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at lis.njleg.state.nj.us
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 84 N.J. 58 (1980)(static.case.law)
- Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 99 N.J. 284 (1985)(static.case.law)
- Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020)(www.supremecourt.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e (Title VII definitions)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- N.J.A.C. 13:16, Disparate Impact Discrimination (Division on Civil Rights)(www.njoag.gov).gov
- Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 et seq. (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:15-39.1 (workers' compensation retaliation) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 2B:20-17 (jury service) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:11D-4 (Earned Sick Leave Law retaliation) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:11B-9 (New Jersey Family Leave Act) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- P.L.2025, c.279 (NJFLA threshold; N.J.S.A. 43:21-55.2)(pub.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a24 (State Wage and Hour Law retaliation) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- Montells v. Haynes, 133 N.J. 282 (1993)(static.case.law)
- 29 U.S.C. 660 (OSH Act section 11(c))(www.law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 160 (NLRA unfair labor practice charges)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- 29 U.S.C. 2617 (FMLA enforcement)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5 (Title VII enforcement)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- EEOC, Time Limits for Filing a Charge(www.eeoc.gov).gov
- EEOC Newark Area Office, Timeliness(www.eeoc.gov).gov
- EEOC New York District Office, Timeliness(www.eeoc.gov).gov
- EEOC Philadelphia District Office, Timeliness(www.eeoc.gov).gov
- EEOC Public Portal(publicportal.eeoc.gov).gov
- EEOC, How to File a Charge of Employment Discrimination(www.eeoc.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. 1981a (damages caps)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center, 174 N.J. 1 (2002)(static.case.law)
- New Jersey Legislature, A605 (2026-2027 session)(www.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- 29 U.S.C. 630 (ADEA definitions)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- New Jersey Division on Civil Rights, Learn How to File a Complaint(www.njoag.gov).gov
- New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, Division on Civil Rights published copy (current through 10/18/2024), incl. N.J.S.A. 10:5-27(www.njoag.gov).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:11B-11 (NJFLA remedies) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:11C-2 to 34:11C-5 (NJ SAFE Act) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 24:6I-52 (cannabis use and employment) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:6B-1 (tobacco use and employment) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 38:23C-20 (military reemployment) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a25 and 34:11-56a25.1 (wage retaliation civil action; 6-year limit) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:5A-17 (Worker and Community Right to Know Act retaliation) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:6A-45 (PEOSH retaliation) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
- N.J.S.A. 34:21-2 (WARN notice and severance) (compiled text retrieved 2026-08-01)(lis.njleg.state.nj.us).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.