What Happens After You Get Arrested
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 21, 2026). · 12 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

After an arrest in the United States, the usual sequence is booking at the jail, a decision by a prosecutor about what to charge, a prompt appearance before a judge or magistrate, a decision about release or bail, and then an arraignment where the charges are read and a plea is entered. The U.S. Constitution sets a few fixed points along the way, such as a judge's prompt review of probable cause after a warrantless arrest and the right to counsel. The timing and names of each step come from state law, so they differ from state to state.
Look up a charge code
Enter a code to see which law book it comes from and open the official text.
This page describes the arrest-to-arraignment process in general terms, using the U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court decisions, federal rules (which govern federal cases only) and named state examples, each tied to its statute, rule or official court page. Each state sets its own timelines and terms. To see what a booking code or charge abbreviation means, use the charge code lookup.
The steps at a glance
| Step | What happens | Where the rule comes from |
|---|---|---|
| Arrest | Police take the person into custody, with or without a warrant | Fourth Amendment; state law |
| Booking | Identity, fingerprints, photo, warrant check, charges on the arrest paperwork, property | Jail and sheriff procedures |
| Charging decision | The prosecutor decides whether and what to file | State law; in California, the courts' self-help guide describes it |
| Probable-cause review and first appearance | A judge or magistrate reviews the arrest, gives advice of rights, addresses release | Gerstein, Riverside; Fed. R. Crim. P. 5; state rules |
| Release or bail | Own recognizance, conditions, money bail or detention | State law; 18 U.S.C. 3142 federally |
| Arraignment | Charges read, plea entered | Fed. R. Crim. P. 10; state rules |
| Preliminary hearing or indictment | A check on whether the case can go forward on a felony | Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1; state law |
| Pretrial and trial | Discovery, motions, plea discussions, trial | State and federal rules |
Not every case starts with an arrest. In federal court a judge can issue a summons instead of a warrant at the government's request (Fed. R. Crim. P. 4(a)), and many states let police issue a citation with a promise to appear. If a summons or citation date is missed, a bench warrant can follow.
Booking
Booking is the jail's administrative intake. It is not a court proceeding. Sheriffs' offices describe similar steps. The Greene County, Missouri, Sheriff's Office lists them as:

"Record the arrestee's official information (name, address, DOB, etc.). Fingerprint and photograph the arrestee. Check for outstanding warrants and conduct a criminal background check (completed by Warrants Division). Document the charges and process legal paperwork."
The same office says it will "Confiscate personal property, which is then inventoried and stored." In Santa Cruz County, California, the sheriff describes intake as including "a pat search, property inventory, and completion of medical and mental health questionnaires," then fingerprints and photographs, then booking, "where biographical information is recorded and bail eligibility is determined." Humboldt County, California, transmits fingerprints digitally "to the California Department of Justice for comparison with their database of fingerprints."
These are county examples. Booking steps and the order of them vary by agency.
The booking charge is not the final charge
The charges recorded at booking come from the arrest paperwork. Greene County's booking supervisor checks that the jail has "a legal right to keep the arrestee in our custody, based on charges, and other information provided" once "the Arresting Officer hands their paperwork to the Booking Supervisor." The formal charges come later, from the prosecutor.
California's courts describe that split plainly. The police report "usually says what charges, for what crimes, they recommend the district attorney should file." Under the heading "The prosecutor decides whether to file charges and, if so, what charges to file," the guide says:
"The prosecutor reviews the police report. Then, they decide whether to file charges. They can also ask the police to investigate more. If they file charges, they decide whether to file misdemeanor or felony charges."
So the filed charges can be different from the booking charges: more, fewer, or graded differently, and in some California cases a charge can be filed as either a felony or a misdemeanor (see what a wobbler is). California's courts add a time limit: "In general, someone can only be kept in jail for 48 hours, not including days the court is closed, without being charged with a crime. If they aren't charged by the deadline, they must be released." That is California's rule; other states set their own.
Booking sheets and jail rosters often list a code section or abbreviation rather than a name. The charge code lookup explains what those codes mean and how the state's code is organized, and the felony and misdemeanor classes guide explains the grades.
Questioning and Miranda warnings
The Miranda rule is about questioning, not the arrest itself. In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), the Supreme Court held that the prosecution "may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination." The warnings it described are:
"He must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires."
In federal court the judge at the first appearance repeats part of that: the defendant's "right not to make a statement, and that any statement made may be used against the defendant" (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5(d)(1)(E)).
Probable cause and the first appearance
The constitutional floor
When police arrest someone without a warrant, a judge has not yet looked at whether there was probable cause. In Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975), the Supreme Court held that "the Fourth Amendment requires a judicial determination of probable cause as a prerequisite to extended restraint of liberty following arrest."
County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991), addressed how fast that must happen. The Court said a system that "provides judicial determinations of probable cause within 48 hours of arrest will, as a general matter, comply with the promptness requirement of Gerstein." It added: "This is not to say that the probable cause determination in a particular case passes constitutional muster simply because it is provided within 48 hours." So 48 hours is a general benchmark for the probable-cause review after a warrantless arrest, not a rule that anyone must be released at the 48-hour mark, and not a guarantee that anything under 48 hours is fine. The review is also not necessarily a court appearance: Gerstein said the probable-cause question "can be determined reliably without an adversary hearing."
When the arrest was made on a warrant, a judge already found probable cause before issuing it, which is what the Fourth Amendment's warrant clause requires.
Federal practice: Rule 5
In federal court, "A person making an arrest within the United States must take the defendant without unnecessary delay before a magistrate judge," or, in some cases, before a state or local judicial officer (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5(a)(1)(A)). In a felony case the judge must tell the defendant about the complaint, the right to retain or request appointed counsel, "the circumstances, if any, under which the defendant may secure pretrial release," any right to a preliminary hearing, and the right not to make a statement (Rule 5(d)(1)). These are federal rules for federal arrests.
State deadlines
Each state sets its own deadline and calls the hearing by its own name (first appearance, initial appearance, preliminary arraignment, arraignment). Some examples, each from the state's statute or court rule:
| State | Rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska | Without unnecessary delay and within 24 hours, absent compelling circumstances, including Sundays and holidays; never more than 48 hours after arrest | AS 12.25.150(a) |
| Florida | Within 24 hours of arrest, unless already lawfully released | Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.130(a) |
| Minnesota | For a person arrested without a warrant and not released: without unnecessary delay and within 36 hours, not counting the day of arrest, Sundays and legal holidays, or as soon as a judge is available | Minn. R. Crim. P. 4.02, subd. 5(1) |
| Oregon | Arraignment of a person in custody during the first 36 hours of custody, excluding holidays, Saturdays and Sundays, except for good cause or at the defendant's request | ORS 135.010 |
| California | Without unnecessary delay and within 48 hours after arrest, excluding Sundays and holidays | Cal. Penal Code § 825(a)(1) |
| Texas | Without unnecessary delay, and not later than 48 hours after arrest, before a magistrate | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 15.17(a) |
| Maine | Without unnecessary delay and within 48 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, legal holidays and court holidays | M.R.U. Crim. P. 5(a) |
| Louisiana | Promptly, and within 72 hours, before a judge for appointment of counsel, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays | La. C.Cr.P. art. 230.1(A) |
Many states' rules use "without unnecessary delay" with no hour count, and some apply only to certain arrests (for example, warrantless arrests or people not already released). Read the exact rule for the state where the arrest happened, or ask the public defender.
The right to a lawyer
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the accused "the assistance of counsel for his defense," and Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), applied that to state prosecutions: "The right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours."
When the right begins matters. In Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008), the Court said "we have twice held that the right to counsel attaches at the initial appearance before a judicial officer." Attachment means the right is in force from that point; it does not mean a lawyer is necessarily appointed at that same hearing. Practice varies. Louisiana's rule, for example, brings an arrested person before a judge within 72 hours "for the purpose of appointment of counsel" (La. C.Cr.P. art. 230.1(A)), and in California the judge at arraignment can appoint a lawyer for a defendant who cannot afford one.
The practical point: anyone who cannot afford a lawyer should say so at the first court appearance and ask about the public defender.
Release, bail or detention
At or soon after the first appearance, a judge decides whether the person goes home and on what terms. California's courts list the options a judge has at arraignment: release on a promise to return ("released on their own recognizance"), release under supervision such as home detention or an ankle monitor, setting bail, or not setting bail, in which case the defendant stays in jail until the case is finished.
In federal court, 18 U.S.C. 3142(a) gives four choices: release on personal recognizance or an unsecured appearance bond, release on conditions, temporary detention, or detention. The starting point is release on recognizance or an unsecured bond unless that will not reasonably assure appearance or will endanger others (18 U.S.C. 3142(b)).
Some jails let a person arrange bail during booking, as the Santa Cruz County Sheriff describes. How money bail works, what a bail bond agent charges and what comes back after the case are covered in the bail guide. Release without money is covered in released on own recognizance. Missing a court date after release can lead to a bench warrant and, in many states, a separate failure to appear charge.
Arraignment and the plea
The arraignment is where the defendant is formally told the charges and asked to plead. In federal court it comes after the Rule 5 first appearance and must include "ensuring that the defendant has a copy of the indictment or information," reading it or stating the substance of the charge, and then "asking the defendant to plead" (Fed. R. Crim. P. 10(a)). In California, by contrast, the arraignment "is usually the first court date in a criminal case." The word does not name the same moment in every court system.
Federal defendants "may plead not guilty, guilty, or (with the court's consent) nolo contendere" (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(1)). California's courts list guilty, not guilty and no contest as the most common pleas and advise talking to a lawyer before pleading guilty or no contest, because a conviction "can have immigration consequences for noncitizens." For more, see what an arraignment is and what happens there.
Preliminary hearing or indictment
Before trial, many systems include a check on whether there is probable cause for the case to go forward, especially on felony charges. In federal court, a magistrate judge must hold a preliminary hearing for any offense other than a petty offense unless, among other exceptions, the defendant waives it or is indicted (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(a)). It must be held "no later than 14 days after the initial appearance if the defendant is in custody and no later than 21 days if not in custody" (Rule 5.1(c)). At the hearing "the defendant may cross-examine adverse witnesses and may introduce evidence," and if the judge finds probable cause the defendant must appear for further proceedings (Rule 5.1(e)).

These are federal deadlines. In California, after a not-guilty plea, a felony case usually goes next to a preliminary hearing and a misdemeanor case to a pretrial conference, according to the state's courts.
What comes next
After the arraignment, the case moves into pretrial proceedings. In general terms:
- Discovery and motions. Federal Rule 12(b)(3) lists issues that must be raised by pretrial motion, including defects in the charging document, "suppression of evidence," and discovery requests. States have their own motion rules.
- Plea discussions. A case can be resolved by a plea. In federal court the judge must address the defendant personally in open court before accepting a guilty or no-contest plea, and must find a factual basis before entering judgment on a guilty plea (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)).
- Trial deadlines. Speedy-trial rules set outer time limits. In federal court, after a not-guilty plea, trial generally must begin within 70 days of the filing of the indictment or information or the defendant's appearance before the court where the charge is pending, whichever is later, with many excluded periods (18 U.S.C. 3161(c)(1), (h)). State deadlines differ.
- After the case. An arrest or charge can leave a record even if the case is dismissed. Whether it can be sealed or expunged is state law; see the expungement guide.
If someone you know was just arrested
- Find out where they are held by calling the local jail or checking its online roster, and ask for the booking number and listed charges.
- Look up the charge codes with the charge code lookup, remembering the prosecutor may file something different.
- Ask about bail and the first court date. The jail or court clerk can say whether bail has been set and when the person will see a judge. The bail guide explains the payment routes.
- Ask about the public defender for the court that will hear the case. The right to counsel attaches at the first appearance.
- Write down every court date. A missed date can lead to a bench warrant and a new charge.
Disclaimer
This page is general legal information about what happens after an arrest in the United States, based on the U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court decisions, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and federal statutes (which govern federal cases only), and the named state statutes, court rules and official pages, checked on October 20, 2026. Procedures and deadlines differ by state and change over time, and this page is not legal advice. For advice about a specific arrest, contact the public defender's office or a criminal defense lawyer licensed in the state where the case is pending.
Last updated: October 20, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens after you get arrested?
Usually booking at the jail, then a prosecutor's decision about what to charge, a prompt appearance before a judge or magistrate where release or bail is addressed, and an arraignment where the charges are read and a plea is entered. Felony cases often also have a preliminary hearing or a grand jury indictment. Timing and names vary by state.
How long can police hold you without seeing a judge?
It depends on the state. After a warrantless arrest, the Constitution requires a judge to review probable cause promptly. In County of Riverside v. McLaughlin the Supreme Court said a review within 48 hours will generally be prompt enough, though not automatically, and under Gerstein v. Pugh that review does not have to be a hearing. State rules set the deadline for bringing the person before a judge, such as 24 hours in Alaska and Florida and 48 hours excluding Sundays and holidays in California.
What is booking?
Booking is the jail's administrative intake after an arrest: recording the person's identity, taking fingerprints and a photo, checking for warrants, documenting the charges on the arrest paperwork, and inventorying personal property. Some jails also do medical screening and determine bail eligibility. Steps vary by agency.
Are booking charges the same as the charges filed?
Not necessarily. Booking charges come from the arrest paperwork. California's courts explain that the prosecutor reviews the police report and decides whether to file charges and which ones, including whether to file them as misdemeanors or felonies.
When do you get a lawyer after an arrest?
The Supreme Court held in Rothgery v. Gillespie County that the right to counsel attaches at the initial appearance before a judicial officer. That does not always mean a lawyer is appointed at that same hearing. Anyone who cannot afford a lawyer should ask about the public defender at the first appearance.
Do police have to read you your rights when they arrest you?
Miranda warnings are tied to custodial interrogation. Under Miranda v. Arizona, statements from custodial questioning cannot be used by the prosecution unless the safeguards, including the warnings, were used. The rule is about questioning, not the arrest itself.
What is the difference between a first appearance and an arraignment?
In federal court the first appearance under Rule 5 comes first, and the arraignment under Rule 10, where the defendant pleads to the indictment or information, comes later. Some states, such as California, call the first court date the arraignment. The terms are not used the same way everywhere.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Sources and References
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 4 (arrest warrant or summons on a complaint)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- U.S. Constitution, Fourth Amendment (LII)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 5 (initial appearance)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (federal pretrial release)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 10 (arraignment)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1 (preliminary hearing)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Greene County (MO) Sheriff's Office, Intake, Warrants and Booking Operations(greenecountymo.gov).gov
- Santa Cruz County (CA) Sheriff's Office, Corrections FAQ(shf.santacruzcountyca.gov).gov
- Humboldt County (CA) Sheriff's Office, Booking(humalertca.gov).gov
- California Courts Self-Help Guide: Criminal charges are filed(selfhelp.courts.ca.gov).gov
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- AS 12.25.150 (Alaska, time to appear before a judge)(www.akleg.gov).gov
- Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.130 (first appearance)(www-media.floridabar.org)
- Minn. R. Crim. P. 4.02 (appearance after arrest)(www.revisor.mn.gov).gov
- ORS 135.010 (time of arraignment)(www.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- Cal. Penal Code § 825 (time to appear before a magistrate)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 15.17 (duties of arresting officer and magistrate)(tcss.legis.texas.gov).gov
- Maine Rules of Unified Criminal Procedure, Rule 5(www.courts.maine.gov).gov
- La. C.Cr.P. art. 230.1 (appearance for appointment of counsel)(www.legis.la.gov).gov
- U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment (LII)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- California Courts Self-Help Guide: Arraignment(selfhelp.courts.ca.gov).gov
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 (pleas)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 12 (pleadings and pretrial motions)(www.law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (Speedy Trial Act time limits)(www.law.cornell.edu)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.